Distillation Column Report PDF
Distillation Column Report PDF
Distillation Column Report PDF
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The main objective of this project was to carry out a design on the Propane distillation column for a
process that produces 1,3 Butadiene. The raw materials used are Butane, Oxygen and Water and
the process capacity is 100 000 tonnes per annum nominal. In the previous work it was stated that
the plant is located in China. The main location of the plant is in the capital city of the Gansu
Provence, Lanzhou. This was decided as the location over other provinces due to the excellent
transport links and the availability of raw materials and cheap labour. The close proximity to
suppliers, customers and skilled labour all make Lanzhou the ideal location for the plant to be
located.
The design of the distillation column consists of the packed type. The distillation is a multi-
component distillation involving separation of Propane from the other components at very high
pressure. The number of theoretical stages chosen was 16 stages based on a reflux ratio of 0.608.
The column diameter calculated was 0.61 at maximum pressure gradient possible for distillation
columns and 0.66m for minimum pressure gradient, which was then scaled up to 0.65m. This was a
reasonable decision as it may be helpful when the plant capacity increases. The column has a height
of 8m. Feed location for the arrangement of packing is at stage 3 from the top of the column. Pall
rings constructed out of stainless steel with a size of 25mm is used for packing. The vessel thickness
of the column is around 5mm, constructed out of stainless steel also to avoid corrosion.
A preliminary design on the condenser for this distillation column was also carried out. The type of
condenser is a fixed plate with a 1 shell and 1 tube pass. The tubes are stainless steel, 119 in
number, 2.44m in length, and with a square pitch arrangement. The overall heat transfer coefficient
was also calculated as 486.026W/m2C. The pressure drop on the tube side was 7.306 N/m2 (almost
negligible) as only one tube pass is used with a very short length. The pressure drop on the shell
side was 46.64 N/m2
The next section details on the Piping and Instrumentation over the column. The control system
used for better efficiency of the units is also featured in the same P and ID.. The control mainly used
for this, is the cascade control for the temperature and product composition, also in the varying of
the bottom product flow rate to control the level at the bottom of the column. The variables
controlled are the top and bottom temperatures including product composition and the reflux drum
and also the level at the base of the column.
There were two group tasks performed in this term along with the individual design. The first group
task performed was the HAZOP on the feed line of the propane distillation column. The aim of the
HAZOP was to evaluate the selected process line and identify the possible deviations which could
result into a hazard; the possible causes to the deviations, consequences and actions needed to
avoid the consequences were also discussed. An improvised P and ID was then produced after
Hazop was done. The Hazop was done with Dr. Titiloye as the Study Leader. The deviations
discussed include no flow, less flow, less temperature due to weather conditions, more
temperature likely to occur as a result of external fire and extra phase in an event of poor
separation, presence of heat transfer fluids, presence of off gases, corrosion inside the pipe catalyst
pellets in the pipe and excess residue due which leads ultimately to contamination.
The second group work is the economic appraisal, which was useful in concluding that if this project
were to be operational; the payback period would be two years which would leave 13 years of net
profit. So, from a financial aspect, the project was found to be very viable and attractive.
Both the group works are attached in the Appendix VI and VII
Contents
1.0 Project Brief: ..................................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Introduction to the product: ........................................................................................................ 5
1.2 Production: ................................................................................................................................... 6
1.3 Location [4] .................................................................................................................................... 7
2.0 Project Plan and Objectives:........................................................................................................... 10
2.1Technical Objectives:................................................................................................................... 10
2.2 Personal Objectives: ................................................................................................................... 12
2.3 Schedule ..................................................................................................................................... 13
2.3.1Project Schedule ................................................................................................................... 13
3 The Revised Process: ......................................................................................................................... 15
4 The Chemical Design: ........................................................................................................................ 17
4.1 Calculations: ............................................................................................................................... 20
4.1.1 Reflux ratio and the number of Theoretical Stages ............................................................ 21
4.1.2 Determination of the Diameter of the Column: ................................................................. 28
4.1.3Feed Location: ...................................................................................................................... 31
4.2 Choice of Plates and Packing: ..................................................................................................... 33
4.2.1 Types of Packing: ................................................................................................................. 34
4.3 Column Internals [21][22]: .............................................................................................................. 43
5.0 CONDENSER:................................................................................................................................... 48
5.1 Energy Balance Over the condenser: ......................................................................................... 49
5.2 Shell Side Coefficient: ................................................................................................................. 54
5.3 Tube Side Coefficient: ................................................................................................................ 55
5.4 Overall Heat transfer Coefficient U; ........................................................................................... 56
5.5 Shell side Pressure Drop: ............................................................................................................ 59
5.6Tube Side Pressure Drop: ............................................................................................................ 63
6.0 REBOILER: ....................................................................................................................................... 65
6.1 Heat Duty over the Reboiler:...................................................................................................... 66
6.2 Choice of type of reboiler used with the Propane Distillation: [28] ............................................. 67
7.0 Overall Energy Balance over the Distillation Column: ................................................................... 68
8.0 Piping and Instrumentation Diagram ............................................................................................. 69
In 1863, a French chemist isolated a previously unknown hydrocarbon from the pyrolysis of amyl
alcohol.[1] This hydrocarbon was identified as butadiene in 1886, after Henry Edward
Armstrong isolated it from amongst the pyrolysis products of petroleum.[1] In 1910,
the Russian chemist Sergei Lebedev polymerized butadiene, and obtained a material with rubber-
like properties. This polymer discovered was too soft to replace the natural rubber in many of its
uses, especially automobile tires.
The butadiene industry originated during the World War II. Many of the belligerent nations realized
that in the event of war, they could be cut off from rubber plantations controlled by the British
Empire, and sought to remove their dependence on natural rubber.
In 1929,Eduard Tschunker and Walter Bock, working for IG Farben in Germany, made a copolymer
of styrene and butadiene that could be used in automobile tires. Worldwide production quickly
ensued, with butadiene being produced from grain alcohol in the Soviet Union and the United
States and from coal-derived acetylene in Germany.[1]
Butadiene is the raw material used [2] in the making of various synthetic rubbers and polymer resins
as well as a few chemical intermediates.
It is mainly used to make styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) which is used to make automobile tyres. It
is also used in adhesives, sealants, coatings and rubber article such as shoe soles. SBR is has a high
molecular weight, as it has excellent resistance to abrasion, it is widely used in the automobile tyre
industry.
Various other uses of butadiene are detailed in the table attached in Appendix I Section (b).
1.2 Production:
Butadiene is produced commercially by three main processes:[3]
Steam Cracking of Paraffinic Hydrocarbons: In this process, butadiene is a co-product in the
manufacture of ethylene (the ethylene co-product process).
Catalytic Dehydrogenation of n-Butane and n-Butene (the Houdry process).
Oxidative Dehydrogenation of n-Butene (the Oxo-D or O-X-D process).
Each of these processes produces a stream commonly referred to as crude butadiene that is rich in
1,3-butadiene.
In the United States, western Europe, and Japan, butadiene is produced as a by-product of
the steam cracking process which is used to produce ethylene and other olefins. The quantity of
butadiene produced depends on the hydrocarbons used as feed. Light feeds, such as ethane, give
primarily ethylene when cracked, but heavier hydrocarbons favour the formation of heavier olefins,
butadiene, and aromatic hydrocarbons.
Butadiene can also be produced by the catalytic dehydrogenation of normal butane. The first
commercial plant, producing 65,000 tons per year of butadiene, began operations in 1957
in Houston, Texas.
In the previous project it was decided that Oxydehydrogenation Process would be employed to
produce butadiene for the plant to be built in China, which uses Butene as the main raw material.
Due to the easy availability of Butane from the nearby industries, it was decided to integrate the
process, where butane was first decided to be catalytically dehydrogenated to Butnene and the O-
X-O D Process follows after that. The specification was not clearly illustrated in the project earlier,
and hence it’s now detailed further in this project.
Figure 3 : graph to show Production Capacity and Output of Butadiene in China, 2001-2008 (Unit:
10,000 tons)http://www.researchinchina.com/UpLoads/Article/2008112601.gif
It was decided that the best place locate the butadiene plant in China which can satisfy the
demands of its market in near future is in Lanzhou, the capital of the Gansu province which is in
north western china.
While deciding the plant location several factors were taken into consideration:
Productivity - Since 1949 Lanzhou has been transformed from the capital of a poverty-stricken
province into the centre of a major industrial area. The GDP per capita of Lanzhou was 25,566 Yuan
(RMB) (US$3,681) in 2008, ranked no. 134 among 659 Chinese cities.
River - Lanzhou is situated at the upper course of the Yellow River. The river can provide water to
the plant as the process requires large quantities of water for scrubbing and cooling. Also the river
provides hydropower to the industries and cities in Gansu. A large multipurpose dam has been built
in the Liujia Gorge on the Yellow River above Lanzhou. The river also helps in transportation.
Natural Resources - Lanzhou has many natural resources which include coal, gold, silver, nickel,
manganese, clay and dolomite. The Coal is obtained from Qinghai which provides thermal power.
The catalyst for our process is nickel which will be cheaper to buy and will be available in large
quantities.
Cheap Labour - Due to the presence of the Yellow river the site is a residential area for more than
3.3 million people. Cheap labour is available for the plant. There are many top ranked universities in
this province which means qualified staff will be available at the site.
Industrial area - Gansu has one of the largest oil refineries in the country and Lanzhou itself is the
centre of the province's petrochemical industry. The main industries include rubber, petrochemical,
oil refinery and machinery industry. Butane which is the raw material for our process is readily
available and also Butadiene (product) can be sold to the neighbouring industries. Also, the
machinery parts will be available from the neighbouring industries which will reduce the cost of
transportation and energy and time.
Transportation - Lanzhou is very well interconnected to various cities and provinces through
highways, railways and airlines. There are 3 major national highways namely China National
Highways 212,213 and312, connecting Lanzhou to different provinces of the country.
Transportation is cheap and easy. The Lanzhou Sustainable Urban Transport Project in China aims at
improving the transport infrastructure and urban road networks. The total Asian Development Bank
contribution is estimated at US$150 million. This project is under planning and is expected to get its
approval by 11th Dec; 2010.This will greatly enhance the transportation of our product to different
provinces when our plant is ready for production.
2.1Technical Objectives:
Description of a control system for the distillation column for best possible results is to be
done
To study concepts of process control including principles of feedback and feed forward,
apply these concepts to the design of instrumentation and control system for a
distillation column.
Propose a control system which will execute the desires of the process functionality
Piping and Instrumentation Diagram for the distillation column is obligatory
Exhibit an understanding of engineering codes, standards and regulations
Develop skills through use of computer software such as Microsoft Visio
Carry out a group study on the HAZOP for any one of the individual selected processes to
achieve the following outcomes
To be able to investigate how the chemical plant might deviate from the design intent
To be able to identify scenarios that would lead to the release of hazardous and
flammable materials to the environment and also to determine whether a particular
deviation would result into an hazard
Work effectively in a team to achieve the project goal
Economic appraisal (group work) for the full process on production of 1,3 Butadiene in order
to gain the following outcomes
Work effectively in the group to enhance team work skills
To estimate the costs and benefits of production of products using the desired process
route
To study the economic feasibility of the production of products
Written report preparation based on the selected design to achieve the following
Assemble and use relevant background information
Provide Complete Referencing
Appendices containing lengthy derivations, calculations, large drawing, computer
printouts etc.
Enhance organisational skills and keeping to deadlines: The tasks would be scheduled at
regular meeting with the supervisor where the deadlines will be decided which have to be
met for a successful project.
To utilize our initiative: Many decision making processes will be used in the undertaking a
couple sections of this project. Each member will need to use their initiative to come to a
sensible and reasonable conclusion, which will benefit the entire group.
Develop Communication Skills: Communication skills are enhanced both by meetings with
the supervisor and the group meetings. This would provide and individual a platform to build
his confidence and propose his ideas.
Enhance Team-working Skills: HAZOP and Economic Appraisal have to be carried out as a
group. The group members are required to co-operate with each other, share and listen to
ideas and take constructive criticism from group members. This will encourage each
member to provide advice and feedback.
Professional report writing: At the end of our project I wish to able to deliver a professionally
laid out report.
2.3 Schedule
To support me in achieving these objectives a schedule has been devised to plan the project and
ensure that all required tasks are undertaken, within the time period set for the study to be
completed. This can be seen below. A Gantt chart is also attached for assistance in the Section 3(b)
in the Appendix II. This is the revised Gantt Chat according to with the schedule has actually been
carried out. A Gantt chart which was made earlier to aid in maintain time is attached in Section 3(a)
in the Appendix II
2.3.1Project Schedule
Serial
No. Objective Start Date End Date
To complete the objectives of the project various sources would be utilised for research work. The
main source of information used will be university library, Birmingham city library, Aston
University’s access to online journals, internet and contacting companies in relation to scope of the
project. Discussions would be carried out with Dr. Titiloye to check the track of the work and to
ensure correct research is carried out.
Magnesium ferrite
C4H8 + ½ O2 C4H6 + H2O..................................(1)
1 bar / 590-650°C
It is a one step process, where Butene gets oxidised straight away, without the need of butane
dehydrogenation. Since our plant is close to an oil refinery plant, where butane can be obtained at a
cheaper price in abundance, a decision to integrate the conversion of Butane to Butene in our
process was made. This reaction would take place in the first reactor and then the produced butene
is fed into the second reactor for further processing. The catalytic dehydrogenation of Butane to
Butene is not a part of our OXO process which we had considered in the previous report.[3] The
same method was carried out in the first project, but it was not stated clearly stated in literature.
Tubular Rector
C4H10 + O2 0 C4H8 + H2O.................................(2)
1Atms/590 C
Cromina-Alumina
Equation (1) gives 100% completion; higher conversions at lower temperatures are possible with
fewer side reactions and improved yields. It is also easier to remove the hydrogen as it is now
present as water vapor and can be condensed out. It is an exothermic reaction; heat input to the
reactor is thus eliminated as heat is recovered to generate high pressure steam. By feeding stream
and air to the reactor it is possible to carry out continuous in-situ catalyst regeneration. The steam
also absorbs some heat released by a small amount of hydrocarbon oxidation and has a beneficial
effect on butene selectivity to butadiene. In general, the equipment used is smaller and utilities
usage is reduced for a given throughout compared with the conventional dehydrogenation process.
A typical flow goes from the feed stream, with a composition of butene feedstock, 90% n-butene,
5% butane, 2% of small amounts of Hydrocarbon and 1% Butadiene. Air is compressed and mixed
with steam before heating in a furnace at 480-590◦C. This mixture is then blended with butenes and
passed over the oxidative dehydrogenation catalyst bed in the reactor. Three reactors are used in
parallel (multitubular reactor) with a fixed bed of mixed oxide catalysts, feeding into a single stream
recovery and purification train. The products from the reactor are cooled. Heat is recovered from
reactor effluent with water sprays and can be used to generate process stream. After quenching,
Stream is cooled to about 400◦C, by direct contact with cold water. Cooling the stream causes
condensation, the condensate being removed by a simple phase separation. Washing and scrubbing
occurs in order to remove all water-soluble impurities, the C4 fraction is recovered in an oil
absorption section. The mineral oil absorber has the ability to absorb the hydrocarbon components
of the stream, in this case the butadiene whilst rejecting gases such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide. The
fat oil is stripped and crude butadiene is transferred to the final purification step. The product is
then obtained from the tailing column which is then fed into the recovery unit. Small amounts of
oxygenated compounds are also produced and these are separated and taken to a waste disposal
unit. Water sprays are used to reduce fouling in the plant.
The advantages for this process are that the catalyst life is long which lasts for around 1000 hours.
The capital costs compared to the other oxidative dehydrogenation process routes are more
favorable because of the low steam requirements for the mixture and the relatively high
concentration of butadiene leaving the reactor. Reactors are set up to de-coke the catalyst and
restore its activity, and to allow more effluent output of butadiene. At high temperatures (up to
6000C), oxygen acts to oxidatively regenerate the catalyst. Also there are a class of metal Vanadate
catalysts that are newly being used, which has highly selectivity and high conversions and the
formation of oxygenated by-products is suppressed. The feedstock raw materials are inexpensive in
the United States; a major factor causing this is the trend towards greater usage of feedstock such
as natural gas liquids (ethane, propane). However, there is a growing shortage of these raw
materials, encouraging the use of heavy feedstock such as ethylene. During this process, various by
products are produced. These by-products must be removed to produce butadiene, so it can be
polymerised. One major by product is vinyl acetylene, which is a highly unsaturated compound, a
poison for the catalysts that polymerise butadiene. Therefore there is a need to produce a
purification process by providing a stream with distillation steps. This allows the process to be
energy-conserving and simple.
A revised Flow Sheet is attached in Appendix III. A compressor is added after the extractive
distillation column, in the new flow sheet that increases the pressure of the process before it can be
sent to the Propane Distillation Column for further purification.
I assume the mass balance to be correct as it was based on many assumptions which were
acceptable. A Copy of the Mass Balance done in the previous project is attached in Appendix IV.
The table below shows the preliminary Mass Balance over the Distillation Column
Table 1 (a): FEED:
Components Flow rate (kg/h) Kmols/hr Kmols fraction
Propane 424.23 9.64 0.04
1,3 butadiene 11904.76 220.46 0.91
1,2 butadiene 500.00 9.26 0.038
Pentane 138.84 1.93 0.008
Total 12967.83 241.29 1
The boiling points of the feed components at 1 atmospheric pressure are as below:
Propane: −42.09 °C
1,3 Butadiene: -4.4 °C
1,2 Butadiene: 10.8 °C
Pentane: 36.1 °C
Looking at the temperature differences it can be said that the components can be separated easily
by reducing the temperatures but since in tangible situations, it is very expensive to reduce down
the temperatures in the plant for continuous process we have to increase the pressure inside the
unit to separate it at reasonable costs. This is done by using compressors or pumps before the feed
is fed into the unit.
It is assumed that the distillate is at a temperature of 400C which is a reasonable assumption as
chilled water can be used to cool down the components in the distillate. Taking this as our basis we
can calculate the pressure and temperature for rest of our unit using Antoine’s Equation. Detailed
calculations are attached in Appendix V; Section (a)
4.1 Calculations:
Basis: 1hr
Units: 1 Kg
Propane boiling point: 40°C/313K @ 13.5 bars
Specifications
Feed condition: Cold Liquid under pressure
Feed inlet temperature @35°C/308K
Temperature of Top of distillation column @ 45°C/318K
Temperature of Bottom of distillation column @ 95°C/368K
Therefore column Temperature will be taken as the average @ 70°C/343K
The detail distillation design was performed by using the main steps below
- Determination of reflux ratio and number of stages required for the distillation
- Calculation of the column diameter and determining the type of column to be used, Packed
or trays
- Column design in detail
Figure 6: Generalised graph between number of theoretical stages V/S Reflux Ratio
http://www.separationprocesses.com/Distillation/DT_Chp04n.htm
Calculations:
The minimum reflux ratio is calculated by using Underwood method. [8]
Since the minimum reflux is calculated for a distillation column which consists of four components,
four variables are used in the above equation. For a multi-component mixture to be split into two
streams (distillate and bottoms) by distillation, it is common to specify the separation in terms of
two ‘’key components’’ of the mixture. Hence in this way multi components can be reduced to
equivalent binary systems.
Therefore,
Latent Heat = (10116.92* 0.04) + (18119.7* 0.91) + (20918.52* 0.038) + (23993.28* 0.008)
Latent Heat = 17880.454 J/mol or KJ/Kmol
q = 1.267
Using the above value of “q” in the Underwood Equation (1), θ is obtained;
θ θ θ θ
Therefore,
N= 20 theoretical stages
Table 6: Number of theoretical stages at different Reflux Ratios
R R/R+1 Nm/N N
1.1*0.468 = 0.515 0.34 0.4 20
1.2*0.468 = 0.562 0.36 0.42 19
1.3*0.468 = 0.608 0.39 0.49 16
1.4*0.468 = 0.655 0.4 0.53 15
1.5*0.468 = 0.702 0.41 0.55 15
1.6*0.468 = 0.749 0.43 0.58 14
From the above observations it is clear that increasing the reflux ratio reduces the number of
stages. But it is seen that increasing the minimum reflux ratios by 1.4 to 1.5 does not changes the
number of theoretical stages.
There are two options available to decide which reflux ratios could be used in our design. Either a
line can be drwan from the origin of the graph as shown below which means that the best available
technique is a mid way between the number of stages and the reflux ratio or this can be debated on
the basis of economic costs.
The increase in the reflux ratio reduces the number of stages in a distillation column. But energy
costs shoot up which has to be considered as well. Since the Distillation column is almost running
for (350 days* 15 years) approximately, it is not a good option to run the column at high reflux
ratios. But if very low reflux ratios are opted, the metal costs to build the column go up. The reflux
ratio chosen for the process is 1.3 × Rmin. I have decided to use a reflux ratio of 0.608 which requires
reasonable costs and the number of stages are also acceptable. [8]
If the Feed is assumed to enter the column at its boiling point there is a huge difference in the reflux
ratios
FAIR CORELLATION (1961)[10] is used to calculate the diameter of the column. To find the diameter,
velocity of the fluids has to be calculated. The calculations are detailed below:
Using the CHART –flooding velocity, sieve plates, in Graph 2 and taking a generalized plate spacing
of 0.6m:
K1 (top) = 0.1
The velocity can now be calculated by;
Hence,
Taking percentage flood @ 80% based on good design considerations, therefore velocity @
flooding:
uf (top) = 0.8*0.4333 => 0.34664 m/sec
Allowing 10% for down comer and 10% for support rings;
There total area = 0.028*1.1*1.1 = 0.034 m2
Hence column diameter above the feed point;
√ √
Using the CHART –flooding velocity, sieve plates in Graph 2; taking a generalized plate spacing of
0.6m:
K1 (bottom) = 5*10-2
The velocity can now be calculated by;
Taking percentage flood @ 80% based on good design considerations, therefore velocity @
flooding:
uf (bottom) = 0.8*0.21665 => 0.17332 m/sec
Allowing 10% for down comer and 10% for support rings;
There total area = 0.237*1.1*1.1 = 0.288 m2
√ √
4.1.3Feed Location:
The number of stages is greatly affected by the subsequent position of the feed into the column.
The feed should enter the column at a point that matches best with the composition of the feed. It
is always a wise decision to provide two or three feed point nozzles around the predicted feed point
which will account for the changes in the feed compositions after the start up.
The propane Distillation column is operating under high pressure. Hence, the feed is either
compressed or pumped into the column. It can be made to compress to a slightly higher pressure
into the feed pipe, approximately 14 bars, so that when it enters the column which is slightly at a
lower pressure than the pipe, some of the propane from the components will immediately expand
and undergo a partial flash vaporisation resulting in vapour liquid separation as it enters the
distillation column.
[ ]
Where,
Nr = number of stages above the feed, including any partial condenser
Ns = number of stages below the feed, including the reboiler
B = Molar Flow Bottom Product
D = Molar Flow Top Product
XfHK = concentration of the heavy key in the feed
XfLK = concentration of the light key in the feed
XbLK = concentration of the light key in the bottom product
XdHK = concentration of the heavy key in the Distillate
[ ]
The calculated value for the distillation column is approximately 0.6 m. The choice between packing
and trays was made on the basis of advantages and disadvantages of each type, and it is concluded
that a PACKING would be best for such small diameters. This decision was made because: [14]
Plate columns are generally designed to handle wider range of vapour and liquid flow rates
than packed columns. Since the gas flow rates in the top of the column is minor, plate
installation would not be a good idea.
Packed columns are not suitable for very low liquid flow rates.
The pressure drop per equilibrium stage (HETP) is lower for packing than plates. Since, the
column is operated at high pressures; it would be a better option to choose packed column
rather than plates to avoid complications.
Packing should always be considered for smaller diameters, generally for column diameters
>0.9m as it is very expensive and difficult to install plates in such columns.
After the decision is made, the design over the packed column has to be done. This includes the
following procedures: [14]
The type and packing size has to selected corresponding to the diameter of the column
Determining the height of the column required for the desired separation
Calculation of the column diameter (capacity), to handle the liquid and vapour flow rates.
Selection of column internal features like; packing support, liquid distributor, redistributors.
Hence, keeping the above requirements into consideration, the packing is broadly classified as
Structured Packing: These are packing with standard geometry made of wire mesh or
perforated metal sheets which are folded and arranged together. Some metal structured
packing commonly used in distillation columns are shown in the figure 10. They have low
height of equivalent theoretical plates (HETP) and low pressure drops. They are generally
used in difficult separations which require many stages, like separating isotopes or in high
vacuumed distillation columns. Using structured packing can also used to increase the
capacity and reduce the reflux ratio requirements.
Random Packing: These are variously shaped in rings, saddles etc, and are dumped into the
distillation column to take up a random shape. These structures can be made up of plastics,
ceramics and metals. The various types of random packing are shown in figure 11 below. The
packing manufacturers should be consulted for details for many special types of packing that
are available for special applications.
Raschig rings are the oldest types of random packing whose length is equal to the diameter. These
are cheaper compared to any of the random packing structures but not as efficient as others.
These were then modified to Pall rings which have openings made by folding strips of the surface
into the ring. This increases the liquid distribution by increasing the surface area.
Other types of random packing are, Berl Saddle Ceramic, Intalox Saddle Ceramic, Metal Hypac and
Super Intalox Ceramics.
Selection of Packing:
Hence, for the Propane distillation column Metallic Pall rings with a size of 25mm is used.
Pressure gradient over the enriching section using column diameter as 0.61m
Values for “x” and “y” axis can be calculated and the flooding line can be plotted in the figure above.
Where,
L = Liquid Rate per Area
G= Gas Rate per Area
Since the area remains same; the ratio can just be taken as the normal flow rates of vapours and
liquids.
Hence;
Now,
Where,
Fp = Wet Packing Factor; Appendix V; section (d)
Ψ = Ratio; (density of water/Density of Liquid inside the column)
μL = Liquid Viscosity of 1,3 butadiene is considered in the calculations, as major fraction of the liquid
comprises of 1,3 Butadiene
g = Gravitational constant
Hence;
From the Graph 3; the flooding line is calculated at 6, which is 81 mm Hg/meter. This result is
acceptable since the pressure gradient calculated above, 6mm Hg, it is concluded that the system is
expected to run at very extreme pressure gradients.
The values of pressure gradients for the lower range over the distillation column can be used to
calculate a new diameter. Any of the values between the two ranges can be used for the design.
From the same graph above a new value of “ ” is plotted at 40mmHg/m is now calculated.
Hence the Flooding line would be,
Since,
Therefore,
Since the gas flow rate per area in decreased; the diameter has to be increased.
Hence,
√ √
Since, the change in diameter is not drastic the packing used can still be suitable for this diameter.
The capacity of the column can be anything between 0.61m – 0.66m depending on the flooding line.
Hence, it has been concluded that the capacity will be 0.65m; which can also be helpful when the
production capacity of the plant increases. The flooding like can be changed accordingly.
Hence, HETP for the propane distillation column is 0.5m as the size for pall rings used is 25mm.
This means, one stage is 0.5m since there are 16 stages calculated earlier, total height of the column
= 0.5*16 = 8m
Flooding is prevented due to the tall height of the column.
Since the feed stream is put after 3 stages; the position of the feed stream is (0.5m*3 stages) 1.5 m
at the top and the length below it is 6.5 m.
The thickness of the cylindrical section of the column can be calculated by a formula from British
standards PD 5500:
Where,
Pi = Internal pressure
σs = Design Stress for stainless steel @ 1000C; Appendix V; section (e)
e = minimum thickness of the material
Hence,
The thickness of the Domed Section of the column can be calculated by:
( √ ) ( √ )
A tank diameter of less than 15m should have a minimum allowable thickness of 5mm [16]. The
thickness obtained from calculation would hold the weight of content in the vessel, but would not
stand depression or dent. Therefore, a 5mm minimum allowable thickness was given for any vessel
less than 1m because this can withstand depression. Hence, the results obtained are acceptable.
And;
And,
And,
Liquid Distributors:
In the Weir types the liquid flows over the notched weirs in the gas stand-pipes. These stand an
upper grade over the orifice type in handling wider range of liquid flow rates. The column designed
uses Orifice type of distributor. A pipe manifold distributor shown in figure 17 is used when the
liquid is fed to the column under pressure and the flow rate is reasonably constant. The distribution
pipes and orifices are accurately sized for equal uniform distribution.
Orifice
type is exploited in the propane distillation column.
Liquid Redistributors:
A full distributor shown in figure 18 combines the function of packing support and liquid distributor.
The maximum bed height that should be used without liquid redistribution lies solely on the type of
packing and the process. The wall-wiper type is mainly used in small columns of less than 0.6m in
diameter. This operates in a mechanism were a ring collects liquid from the column wall and
redirects it into the centre packing.
Installing Packing:
The column is filled with water and the packing is dumped into the water ensuring the level of
water always being above the packing at all times. Metal and Ceramic packing are generally
deserted into the column “WET”. This ensures random distribution and prevents any damage to the
packing.
In case of “DR ” packing the packing should be lowered into the columns in buckets or other
containers.
Concept Drawing:
The Concept Drawing Details the application of column internals more in detail. Bit-Map is used to
create the column showing every possible detail and dimension. The non calculated values are
assumed to British standards.
5.0 CONDENSER:
Condensers are units similar to heat exchangers, which are used to condense the vapours to their
liquid state. Condensers vary in size ranging from hand handled units to large industrial scale units.
For condensers used in distillation columns, the process fluid generally flows through the shell side
and the cooling fluid is made to flow through the tube side. The two fluids never come in contact
with each other. The diagram below shoes a one tube pass condenser.
Horizontal shell side and vertical tube side is widely used as condensers. The other two are usually
used in arrangements for heaters and vaporisers using steam as the heating medium.
Assumptions:
It is assumed that a horizontal shell side condenser is used to cool the propane vapours.
It is a complete condenser. Hence all the vapours are cooled down.
There is one shell and one tube pass inside the condenser and the flow is counter current.
Since the top product mainly comprises of the propane, the physical properties of propane
are used for all the calculations.
The cooling fluid chosen is chilled water that enters the tube side at 15 0C and leaves at 450C.
The tube layout for this particular design is arranged in a squared pitch.
Basis: 1 hour
Flow rate entering the condenser; V
V = L+D; 402.39 + 661.83 = 1063.22 kg/hr
“mL” due to phase change, since it is a complete condenser where phase change occurs; and
“mCp∆T” due to increase in the energy per degree rise in temperature.
Latent heat of Vaporisation of Propane (1,3 Butadiene is ignored as it would not bring a vast
difference)= L = 322.76 kJ/Kg
Therefore,
Since the Heat lost by the condenser is calculated the flow rate of water required can also be
calculated as relevant from the following formula;
It is assumed earlier that the chilled water enters the condenser @ 150C and leaves @ 450C. Hence
∆T = 300C
Hence,
From the diagram above it now becomes easier to ∆TLM. The Log mean temperature difference is
given by:
Where,
∆TLM = log mean temperature
TIN = inlet temperature of process fluid
To begin with the design, we assume an approximate overall coefficient. This is done in aid with
Graph 4; where the fluid in the process side are classified as Paraffin and the fluid in the service side
is taken as River, Well or Sea Water.
Hence, the assumed overall coefficient = 600 W/m2 0C
Graph 4: Overall Coefficients (join process side to the service side and read U values from the
centre line)
Trial Area:
Where,
Q= Heat Transfer per unit Time
U= Heat Transfer Coefficient
A= Area
∆TLM = Log Mean Temperature difference
Hence, the surface area can now be calculated from the above data specified.
Therefore,
Since there is slight condensation occurring, hence the number of tubes calculated is so less.
Where,
Nt = number of tubes
K1 and n = constants obtained from table 9[25]
Do = Outer diameter
Table 9: K and n constants for square arrangements:
Square pitch, Pt = 1.25 do
Number of Passes 1 2 4 6
K1 0.215 0.156 0.158 0.0402
n1 2.207 2.291 2.263 2.617
Hence,
We take it as 12 tubes as the number of tubes should be even and divisible by 4 as the arrangement
is a square pitch.
Mean temperature:
Hence,
( )
( )
[ ]
The value obtained is close enough to the value assumed (1500W/m 2K), hence the estimated Tw is
acceptable.
Eagle and Ferguson (1930) adapted a much reliable formula for the heat transfer coefficient for
water used in the tube side. This is stated as below:
Where,
hi = inside coefficient for water
t = mean water temperature
ut = water velocity
di = tube inside diameter
Density of water at 27.50C (mean water temperature in the tubes) = 995.65 Kg/m3
Hence, substituting the values of velocity, the heat transfer coefficient of water inside the tube is;
Where,
U = the overall coefficient based on the outside area of the tube, W/m 2 0C
ho = outside fluid film coefficient, W/m 2 0C
hi = inside fluid film coefficient, W/m 2 0C
hod = outside dirt coefficient; fouling factor, W/m 2 0C
hid = inside dirt coefficient; fouling factor, W/m 2 0C
kw = thermal conductivity of the tube wall material, W/m0C
di = tube inside diameter, m
do = tube outside diameter, m
Fouling Factors: As neither of the fluid is heavily fouling, the dirt coefficient at both the sides has
been assumed to be 6000 W/m 2 0C and kw is assumed to be 50 W/m0C
The value obtained is significantly lower than the assumed value of 600 W/m2 0C
The calculation has to be repeated using different values of Overall heat transfer coefficient by trial
and error method; and the closest possible answer firms up the final design.
Where,
And
Again using Eagle and Ferguson’s (1930) formula tube side coefficient is calculated. But the velocity
of the water in the tubes changes;
Hence, the new calculated value for the Tube Side Coefficient;
The results are satisfactory. The values obtained are close enough to the values assumed hence, the
design is confirmed.
Specifications:
Where,
Jf = Friction factor
L = Length of the tubes
Lb = baffle Spacing
All the unknowns are calculated below.
Cross Sectional Area As for the hypothetical row of tubes at the Shell Equator
Where,
Pt = Tube Pitch
Ds = shell inside diameter
LB = baffle spacing
Where,
Ws = Fluid Flow Rate on the shell side in kg/sec
Linear Velocity us
( )
Friction Factor; jf
Friction factor is estimated from a graph in FIG; which is a correlation between Reynolds’s number
and baffle cut.
Hence,
Substituting all the above calculated values in the pressure drop equation;
The Pressure drop is negligible; hence more sophistication calculation is not justified.
[ ( ) ]
Hence,
6.0 REBOILER:
Reboilers are used with the distillation column to vaporise a fraction of the bottom product.
There are three different kind of reboilers used: [28]
Forced Circulation; where the fluid is pumped through the exchanger. The vapour formed is
separated and sent back to the bottom of the distillation column and rest is removed.
Kettle Reboilers, also called submerged bundle reboilers; where boiling takes place on the
tubes immersed in a pool of liquid. The liquid does not circulate through the heat exchanger.
These are the most expensive kind of Reboilers.
In the above equation, the ∆H® (Heat of Vaporisation) is considered only for 1, 3 Butadiene as major
fraction of the component entering the Reboiler comprises of 1, 3 Butadiene. Minor fractions of
propane, pentane and 1, 2 Butadiene is ignored. This would not affect the result drastically as the
Heat of vaporisation of the other components somewhere lies in the same range.
Hence,
Assuming; that the bottom product is liquid at boiling point which enters the Reboiler at 368K.
Heat obtained by the process fluid is the heat lost by the steam entering the Reboiler.
Hence the “Q” remains same. Assuming steam entering the Reboiler at 2.6 bars,
Hence, ∆H® for steam at 2.6 bars = 2177.42 KJ/Kg
The choice of the kind of reboiler used with a distillation column solely depends on the following:
The viscosity and the propensity to fouling of the process fluid
The operating pressure
The headroom available to layout the equipment.
After careful judgement, it is concluded that a Horizontal Thermosyphon Reboiler would be used
with this distillation column, since the horizontal reboilers require less headroom. These are most
economical type of reboilers for most application and are not suitable for high viscous fluids. The
fluids in the column have very low viscosity.
Also these reboilers are suitable for high temperatures and high pressure which fulfil the demands
for this unit.
The only disadvantage with this kind of reboiler is that a hydrostatic head is required for the
thermosyphon effect which requires elevation of the column base. This problem can be overcome
by using supporters at the distillation column is not huge.
The Energy Balance over the column could not be calculated in the first part of the assignment as
the Reflux Ratios were unknown.
The Heat Duty over the Condenser and the Reboiler is calculated. It is summarised in the table
below.
Units Energy Required Energy Released
Condenser - 98.434 KW
Reboiler - 421.826KW -
Total -323.392 KW
The Negative Sign shows that the Energy is required to run the unit.
Since the Process of Butadiene production is very complex which includes many units, the P
and ID is only done over the Propane Distillation Column which is attached in Appendix, 6
(issue number 002) The basic units and symbols used in the P and ID are briefly described
below:
Control Valves [31]: The parameters such as temperature, pressure, flow and level are
controlled by the control valve. Control Valves can be manual or automatic which are
partially or fully open or closed. The action of the control valves are in response to the
signals received from their respective controllers that compare the set-point to the
process variables.
CE 3003 Advanced Process Design – Individual Project
Gate Valve [32]: These valves are opens by lifting a round or rectangular wedge out of
the path of the fluid. Gate valves are used when a straight-line flow of fluid and
minimum restriction is desired. These valves should never be used as control valves
unless those are specifically designed for it. Typical gate valves are designed to be
fully opened or closed. There is very low frictional loss when the valve is fully open
due to negligible obstruction. Gate valves are present before and after every control
valve and pump which offers effortless maintenance during equipment failure.
Drain Valve: As the name suggests, these valves are used to drain the components
from the unit or pipelines. These are generally closed and are in operation usually
during site or unit maintenance.
Relief Valve: The relief valve is a type of valve used to control or limit the pressure in a
system or vessel which can build up by a process upset, instrument or equipment
failure, or fire. The pressure is relieved by allowing the pressurised fluid to flow from
an auxiliary passage out of the system. Since the distillation Column taken into
consideration is operating under high pressures, a relief valve can act as a
precautionary measure which would help to get rid out the extra pressure built up
into the unit. It is built on the reflux drum, as building it over the column can lose its
components in the vapour phase that is released. As it is the last stage the purified
butadiene cannot be afforded to be wasted.
RV-1
Pneumatic Lines: The signals transmitted from a controller to the valve are generally
shown by pneumatic lines on a P and ID.
Electric Lines: The dotted lines show the transmission of electric signal in the P and ID.
The electric signal is send by the transmitter to the controller.
High and Low Level Alarms: Alarms alert the operators of serious and potentially
hazardous deviations in the process conditions. Key instruments are fitted with
switches. If there is a delay or lack of response by the operator a hazardous situation
can occur in a short span of time. Often drills are practiced to overcome such
catastrophic situations. When this system turns on, a trip system automatically comes
into action which includes, shutting down of pumps, closing valves, operating
emergency systems etc.
Economics [33]
Plant operating conditions need to be controlled to ensure that the plant is operating at its
optimum, thus ensuring maximum profitability.
Although control is essential, it is known in industry that trying to tightly control absolutely
every stream in the process is very costly and unrealistic and can result in total inflexibility
and even destabilisation of the plant, (control loops may start to interfere with each other’s
actions). Similarly measurement sensors and control valves are expensive, so unnecessary
measurement is a loss of money. Therefore these factors will need to be taken into account
when deciding upon the control.
Various control measures have been taken into account to meet the objectives of the plant
such as safety, operation, environmental constraints and economics. Sensors have been
installed at various process lines and equipments to make the operator aware of the
situation with the equipment and the process. The sensors transfer signals to the controller
which then send back commands to the respective valves to carry out the action.
Control system of the process will be explained as we go along the PID from left to
right.[34][35]
FC 1: the feed pipe is installed with a flow controller, which helps to control the flow
throughout the pipe. The flow rate is received as input to the FT-1, which then sends output
signals to the flow controller FC, which then sends on information to the automated control
valve CV-1. This ensures a steady state and control flow rate of feed to the distillation
column.
PC 1: The distillation column is operating under high pressures. The pressure is a very crucial
variable and has to be controlled to avoid flooding. The pressure is read by a pressure gauge
and this input is received by a PT1 which sends signal to the PC 1 which then forwards the
information to the control valve on the condenser. The condenser would reduce the flow
rate of water if the pressure drops; this intern increases the temperature of the distillate
entering the reflux drum as desired heat exchange was not possible; which increases the
pressure back into the column. The reverse action is carried out if the pressure inside the
column increases. There is a relief valve on the reflux drum which also operates when the
pressure inside the column increases drastically.
LC 1: For desired separation to take place, it is important to maintain the ratio of the
distillate to the reflux Liquid. Hence it is vital to maintain the level in the reflux drum. The
level is read by a level indicator which sends the information to the LT 1 which further
forwards the signal to the control valve on the pipe back to the condenser. If the level in the
drum falls, the controller sends signal to close the valve which results in maintaining the level
in the drum.
TC 1 and FC 2: The temperature should be well maintained inside the column to provide
vaporisation of the volatile fluids for desired separation. Heat is provided by the steam flow
in the reboiler. Hence a controller valve is installed on the pipe which carries steam to the
reboiler. This controller receives signal from the flow transmitter (FT2) or the temperature
transmitter (TT1). If the temperature inside the column reduces, the controller sends signal
to the control valve to open slightly. This increases the flow rate of steam into the reboiler
increasing the temperature of the column.
Indicators:
There are three main indicators used in the P and ID. These are mainly to provide
information of the operating conditions. There are two sample indicators SI (1-1) and SI (1-2),
which provide information about the purity of the fluids entering and leaving the column.
Since, the column’s top temperature is different from the bottom one, two temperature
indicators are required.
A combination of automated valves, flow and temperature indicators along with controllers
are used to control the process. Investment in these instruments and the control system is
required and is necessary. The control system along with the PID is then checked by senior
manager and engineers over a HAZOP meeting. Changes are made to the control and the PID
before the system is installed, in such a way money is saved and at the same time safety of
the operator is ensured.
Since Hazop was carried out on this section of the process, there were certain changes made
from the previously designed control loop system. Issue 001 in Appendix VI shows the draft
copy of the previously designed P and ID which was then improvised to Issue 002
10.0 Conclusion:
The design project has been successful in its aims of providing a detailed knowledge a
chemical process unit. This project was a learning process where different challenges were
faced. At this stage, such a project is aimed to increase general design knowledge of a given
operating unit in this case; a packed bed distillation column. As this was just a preliminary
design, the amount of detail of the design and the accuracy of the final calculations might be
questionable. However, it remains a fact that this project targets more than just design but
also gives an idea of how to make reasonable assumptions and where data is not available,
the use of values which can be used to make reasonable estimates. Overall the project
enhances one’s ability to play around with available data in order reach a reasonable
estimate.
After calculating all the values over my distillation column I conclude that one distillation
column can be used to separate propane and recover 1,3 butadiene. A stepped column can
be used as the diameter for the pentane distillation column, (the unit where the 1,3
butadiene is pumped to for further purification.) is 2 m as suggested my group mate. Since
the diameter for the propane distillation column is 0.65m the top part of the column can
have this diameter and the lower part of the column should have a diameter of 2m. This can
reduce the operating costs and also a significant amount of raw material to build the column
would be reduced.
Also a separator can be used instead of a distillation column, but the temperature has to be
reduced too low, to obtain such separation. This can be more expensive than providing high
pressure inside the column.
11.0 References:
[1]: http://www.wakefield.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/F456AD74-5BC2-4697-9414-
55C32FCBE9E2/0/s1_13Butadiene.pdf,( (Part 1: Group Project on1,3 Butadiene Production)
accessed date 28/11/09
[8]: Dr. Bruce, 3rd year Chemical Engineering Advanced Separation Class Notes, Aston
University, 2010; Lecture 1
[10]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 567-569,
[11]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 579
[12]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 569
*13+: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 526
*14+ : Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 588-593
*15+: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 592
[16]: Dr. Bruce, 3rd year Chemical Engineering Advanced Separation Class Notes, Aston
University, 2010; Lecture 3
[18]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 593
*19+: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 812
*20+: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 216 and 221
[21]: http://www.zehua-chem.com/
[22]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 609-616
*23+: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 709
[25]: Dr. John Brammer, 2nd Year Chemical Engineering Heat transfers Notes, Aston
University.
[26] : http://www.processglobe.com/Liquid_Specific_Heat.aspx
[27]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 711
[28]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 729
*29+: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 195-199
[31]:
http://www.documentation.emersonprocess.com/groups/public/documents/book/cvh99.pd
f ; accessed date 14/03/10
[32]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon,
Oxford, 2005 page 197 -198
[33]: Dr. Fletcher, 2nd Year Chemical Engineering Control Process Notes, Aston University
*34+:Page S. Buckley, William L. Luyben and Joseph P. Shunta ‘’Design of Distillation Column
Control Systems’’
[35]
:http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~jwp/control06/controlcourse/restricted/course/fourth/course/m
odule3-1.html
[36]: Dr. Drahun, 2nd Year Chemical Engineering Advanced Design Process, Aston University.
[37]: Dr Brammer’s, 3rd Year Chemical Engineering Process Economics lecture notes, Section
C,
*38+: Dr Brammer’s, 3rd Year Chemical Engineering Process Economics lecture notes
[40]: Dr Brammer’s, 3rd Year Chemical Engineering Process Economics lecture notes, Section
4(a)
[41]: Dr Brammer’s, 3rd Year Chemical Engineering Process Economics lecture notes, Section
4(b)
Graphs and Correlations:
Graph 1 : Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6,
Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 524
Grapgh 2: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6,
Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 568
Graph 3: Dr, Bruce Davies; 3 year Chemical Engineering advanced Separation notes; Lecture 3
Graph 4: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6,
Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 639
Graph 5: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6,
Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 646
Graph 6: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6,
Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 574
Graph 7: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F ‘’Chemical Engineering Design’’, 4th ed., vol. 6,
Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 668