BLDG3012 - Week 1 PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 32
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that risk management is an important part of project management to avoid cost overruns and schedule delays. Unmanaged risks can lead to projects going over budget and being delayed.

The weekly course schedule covers topics such as risk management process, contingency determination, risk assessment techniques, risk treatment and risk-based decision making over a period of 10 weeks.

Some of the top causes of project failure mentioned are unclear or changing requirements, lack of resources, resource conflicts and turnover of key resources.

Built Environment

BLDG3012 - Construction Commercial Risk,


Health and Safety
Welcome

Week 1
Introduction

The views expressed in this presentation are


those of Pedram Danesh-Mand and do not
reflect or represent the official policy, position
or recommendation of the KPMG Australia,
Pedram Danesh-Mand Engineers Australia (EA) or Risk Engineering
Society (RES). Any written or verbal
Director, KPMG recommendation has a general nature and
should not be used for any decision making
[email protected]
without further assessment for specific
[email protected] project and organisation requirements.
Course Learning Outcomes
At the successful completion of this course, you will be able to:

• Explain risks and uncertainties in relation to stakeholders’ objectives within the process
of risk management.
• Develop and apply tools to assess risks and contingencies for construction projects.
• Analyse and evaluate risks and contingencies applicable in commercial construction
projects.
• Explain risk and contingency plan development and implementation.
• Present a project Risk Management Plan.
Weekly Course Schedule
Construction Commercial Risk, Health and Safety

• Week 1: Introduction to Project Risk Management (Assignment 1)


• Week 2: Risk Management Process (ISO 31000)
• Week 3: Contingency Determination
• Week 4: Contingency Management (RES Contingency Guideline) (Assignment 1)
• Week 5: Risk Management Plan (RMP) (Assignment 2)
• Week 6: Risk Assessment Techniques (ISO 31010)
• Week 7: Risk Assessment Techniques (ISO 31010)
• Week 8: Risk Treatment
• Week 9: Risk-based Decision Making (RBDM)
• Week 10: Assignment 2 Presentations (Assignment 2)
Week 1 – Agenda
• Course Introduction
• Project risk management as part of project management
• Introduction to Risk Management
• What may happen if projects risks are not appropriately managed?
• Risk management approaches and methodologies
• Assignment 1 hand out and introductions / Q&A
Our Actual Performance
Engineering Projects Oil and Gas Projects
42% behind schedule 81% behind schedule

Ref: CIOB, 2007


Our Actual Performance
High-rise Building Projects Power Generation Projects
67% behind schedule 66% behind schedule

Ref: CIOB, 2007


We are fine in Australia?!
• Cost overrun in our transport infrastructure projects since 2001 is about $28B – about a
quarter of the projects’ total value!!
• 2 out of 7 recommendations:
Improve your risk and contingency management

Ref: The Grattan Institute, 2016


Top Causes of Project Failure
• Requirements: Unclear, lack of agreement, lack of priority, contradictory, ambiguous,
imprecise
• Resources: Lack of resources, resource conflicts, turnover of key resources, poor
planning
• Schedules: Too tight, unrealistic, overly optimistic
• Planning: Based on insufficient data, missing items, insufficient details, poor estimate
• Risks & Opportunities: Unidentified or assumed, not managed

Ref: Strategies for Project Recovery, A PM Solutions Research Report, pmsolutions survey, 2011
Risk or Uncertainty?
Risk Definition
Effect of uncertainty on objectives, ISO 31000
An effect is a deviation from the expected – positive or negative
Risk vs. Issue
• RISK might happen, so it’s a function of consequence and likelihood
• ISSUE has already happened, so it’s only consequence/s.
Types of Uncertainty
• Objective Uncertainty
• Subjective Uncertainty
Objective Uncertainty
• Objective Uncertainty associated with cost and schedule model parameters is a
measure of source data variability. If the cost estimating or its input(s) are derived from
statistical analysis of relevant historical data, the uncertainty associated with the cost
estimate or schedule can often be characterized “objective”, meaning derived using a
repeatable, proven process.

• Two objective methods for estimating uncertainty:


– Developing parametric equations through regression analysis
– Fitting distributions to normalized historical data or estimate
Objective Uncertainty – example
Rain Data

Figure 1: Average Rainfall Annual 1961 – Figure 2: Average Number of Rain Day
1990 Bureau of Meteorology exceeding 5 mm Bureau of Meteorology
Subjective Uncertainty
• In the context of cost and schedule estimating, many decisions that heavily influence the
risk analysis will be subjective in nature, meaning they are based more on “subject
matter expert (SME) opinion” than rigorous statistical analysis. Uncertainty is
characterized as “subjective” when there is a lack of actual data and information to
characterize it objectively.
Project Overruns & Uncertainty
• Key factors contributing to project cost overrun and/or schedule delays:
– Hard Factors
» Scope Variations
» Technical

• Soft Factors
– Cognitive Biases
– Strategic Misrepresentation
– Organisational Culture

Ref: Contingency Guideline, 2nd Edition, Risk Engineering Society (RES)


Group Activity 1
Prepare a lump sum price for digging an underground hole.
• 10m x 10m x 5m – Concept Design
• No geotechnical data, assume 80% soil, 20% rock
• Productivity rate in soil: 20m3/d
• Productivity rate in rock: 10m3/d 10m
• Excavator: $2000/d 10m
• Labor: $500/d
• Overhead including profit: $200/d
5m
Q&A and Break
Inherent & Contingent Risks
• Project cost drivers may be grouped into:
– uncertainty (i.e. inherent risk or planned risk) around time-independent costs;
– uncertainty (i.e. inherent risk or planned risk) around time-dependent costs;
– risk event (i.e. contingent risk or un-planned risk) with cost impacts; and
– risk event (i.e. contingent risk or un-planned risk) with time impacts that drive costs.
Inherent Risks
• Inherent Risks represent:
– uncertainty in the scope of work and its quantities or unit rates for the items in the
Base Estimate

• Likelihood of occurrence: 100%

• Examples:
– Quantity: volume of earthworks
– Productivity rate: rate of excavation
Inherent Risks

When project Base Estimate is


being estimated, the costs are
an uncertain quantity and the
Base Estimate is not the only
possible estimate.

“most likely” (mode), “50th


percentile” (median), or
“expected value” (mean).
When the number of cost
items increases, the
distribution of the total cost of
the cost items approximates
the normal distribution. This is
known mathematically as the
Central Limit Theorem
(CLT).

The theorem states that the


average of the sum of a large
number of independent,
random variables with finite
means and variances
converges to a normal
Central Limit Theorem (CLT) random variable.
3-Point Estimate

Ref: Contingency Guideline, RES, 2019


Contingent Risks
• Contingent Risks represent:
– unmeasured items outside the Base Estimate (usually related to the estimation of the
contingency allowance)

• Likelihood of occurrence: usually < 100%

• Examples:
– Extreme wet weather
– Industrial issues
Group Activity 1 – let’s discuss again!
Prepare a lump sum price for digging an underground hole.
• 10m x 10m x 5m – Concept Design
• No geotechnical data, assume 80% soil, 20% rock
• Productivity rate in soil: 20m3/d
• Productivity rate in rock: 10m3/d 10m
• Excavator: $2000/d 10m
• Labor: $500/d
• Overhead including profit: $200/d
5m
Base Estimate & Base Schedule
• Validation of
– Quantities (most likely)
– Productivity Rates (most likely)
– Durations (most likely)
– Resource Cost Rates (most likely)

• Constraints (Contractual or Management)


• Logic network and Work Statements, and
• Reasonable Critical Path
Group Activity
• As a head contractor, W2F, is preparing its response submission for a lump sum
building tender. All packages will be delivered by using external sub-contractors. In
addition to obtaining a number of market quotes, W2F is also using its own internal
benchmark data from previous similar projects.

• As part of the estimate development, you should help W2F to assess and quantify the
inherent and contingent risks as per table below.
Assignment 1, due Wk4, 25%
• Refer to Course Outline
Additional Readings
• ISO 31000:2018
• ISO 31010:2019
• Project Management Institute (PMI) Risk Management Standard
• Risk Engineering Society (RES) Contingency Guideline, 2nd Edition, 2019
• AACEi, Recommended Practices
• Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis, Gilberto Montibeller
and Detlof von Winterfeldt, Risk Analysis, Vol. 35, No 7, 2015
• Edwards, P J and Bowen, P A (2005) Risk management in project organisations, UNSW
• Uher, T and Loosemore, M (2004) Essentials of project management, UNSW Press.
• Boothroyd, C and Emmett, J (1996) Risk management – a practical guide for
construction professionals, Witherby and Co, London.
• Wideman, R M (ed) (1992) Project and program risk management, PMI, London.
• ICE (2000) Risk analysis and management for projects, ICE, London.
• Edwards, L (1995) Practical risk management in the construction industry, Thomas
Telford, London
Q&A & Conclusion

You might also like