BLDG3012 - Week 1 PDF
BLDG3012 - Week 1 PDF
BLDG3012 - Week 1 PDF
Week 1
Introduction
• Explain risks and uncertainties in relation to stakeholders’ objectives within the process
of risk management.
• Develop and apply tools to assess risks and contingencies for construction projects.
• Analyse and evaluate risks and contingencies applicable in commercial construction
projects.
• Explain risk and contingency plan development and implementation.
• Present a project Risk Management Plan.
Weekly Course Schedule
Construction Commercial Risk, Health and Safety
Ref: Strategies for Project Recovery, A PM Solutions Research Report, pmsolutions survey, 2011
Risk or Uncertainty?
Risk Definition
Effect of uncertainty on objectives, ISO 31000
An effect is a deviation from the expected – positive or negative
Risk vs. Issue
• RISK might happen, so it’s a function of consequence and likelihood
• ISSUE has already happened, so it’s only consequence/s.
Types of Uncertainty
• Objective Uncertainty
• Subjective Uncertainty
Objective Uncertainty
• Objective Uncertainty associated with cost and schedule model parameters is a
measure of source data variability. If the cost estimating or its input(s) are derived from
statistical analysis of relevant historical data, the uncertainty associated with the cost
estimate or schedule can often be characterized “objective”, meaning derived using a
repeatable, proven process.
Figure 1: Average Rainfall Annual 1961 – Figure 2: Average Number of Rain Day
1990 Bureau of Meteorology exceeding 5 mm Bureau of Meteorology
Subjective Uncertainty
• In the context of cost and schedule estimating, many decisions that heavily influence the
risk analysis will be subjective in nature, meaning they are based more on “subject
matter expert (SME) opinion” than rigorous statistical analysis. Uncertainty is
characterized as “subjective” when there is a lack of actual data and information to
characterize it objectively.
Project Overruns & Uncertainty
• Key factors contributing to project cost overrun and/or schedule delays:
– Hard Factors
» Scope Variations
» Technical
• Soft Factors
– Cognitive Biases
– Strategic Misrepresentation
– Organisational Culture
• Examples:
– Quantity: volume of earthworks
– Productivity rate: rate of excavation
Inherent Risks
• Examples:
– Extreme wet weather
– Industrial issues
Group Activity 1 – let’s discuss again!
Prepare a lump sum price for digging an underground hole.
• 10m x 10m x 5m – Concept Design
• No geotechnical data, assume 80% soil, 20% rock
• Productivity rate in soil: 20m3/d
• Productivity rate in rock: 10m3/d 10m
• Excavator: $2000/d 10m
• Labor: $500/d
• Overhead including profit: $200/d
5m
Base Estimate & Base Schedule
• Validation of
– Quantities (most likely)
– Productivity Rates (most likely)
– Durations (most likely)
– Resource Cost Rates (most likely)
• As part of the estimate development, you should help W2F to assess and quantify the
inherent and contingent risks as per table below.
Assignment 1, due Wk4, 25%
• Refer to Course Outline
Additional Readings
• ISO 31000:2018
• ISO 31010:2019
• Project Management Institute (PMI) Risk Management Standard
• Risk Engineering Society (RES) Contingency Guideline, 2nd Edition, 2019
• AACEi, Recommended Practices
• Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis, Gilberto Montibeller
and Detlof von Winterfeldt, Risk Analysis, Vol. 35, No 7, 2015
• Edwards, P J and Bowen, P A (2005) Risk management in project organisations, UNSW
• Uher, T and Loosemore, M (2004) Essentials of project management, UNSW Press.
• Boothroyd, C and Emmett, J (1996) Risk management – a practical guide for
construction professionals, Witherby and Co, London.
• Wideman, R M (ed) (1992) Project and program risk management, PMI, London.
• ICE (2000) Risk analysis and management for projects, ICE, London.
• Edwards, L (1995) Practical risk management in the construction industry, Thomas
Telford, London
Q&A & Conclusion