The Manteno-Huancavilca Merchant Lords
The Manteno-Huancavilca Merchant Lords
The Manteno-Huancavilca Merchant Lords
Ancient Ecuador
Brazil, yet it shares with the South American giant 85% of plant
and animal species, and those which are not shared are
1
ecological niches found in Ecuador. When he set himself in the
below 900 meters above sea level, east and west of the Andes, in
flanks of the Andes, between 900 and 2000 meters. The upper
between 2000 and 3500 have been deforested and are dedicated
2000 meters above sea level. This is caused by the cold air
2
not rain it is because the cold Peruvian current has not given way
aquifers and greening the remnants of dry tropical forest and dry
of the estuary of the Guayas River, the Gulf of Guayaquil and the
environment.
3
wished for water through rites involving an spectacular seashell
3500 B.C.
and trade the produce of their activity for other goods not ready
estuarine fishes, land fauna from savanna and tropical bush, and
shells form the deep sub littoral as well as intertidal species are
snaring in the savanna and in the forest. This suggests that more
found in Archaic sites must have been also exchanged from close
4
The people that exploit the mangrove environment today, use
out crabs and Anadara tuberculosa from the mud between the
dye.3
5
3 At the very bottom of the excavation of trench “C”,
of woven textiles.
the rim, to pass a string through them for hanging. There was
evidence of lime inside these vessels, and some were quite full.
6
Structure 7 in Mound B, named by D. W. Lathrap as the Charnel
populations7.
lasted much longer. It has been pointed our that Formative, like
7
extensively need material might be unavailable because of a lack
economy11
name and the nature of the overland traders that moved goods in
late pre-Columbian and early Colonial times from the coast to the
the name of those who connected the coast and the Southern
their existence.
areas.
made from the thorny oyster shell appear. And at the Oriente, in
8
Porras in Machalilla-like association (c. 1400–1000 B.C.). In the
9
sometime were made of the local chert. Laurel leaf points do not
the Coast and the Southern Sierra the armed trading merchants
10
Balsa-raft Trading Sailors
abstracted the news that reached the Court about the Pizarro's
shiplog.
explore south of the river San Juan, while he remained there with
most important finds Ruiz and his crew made was that of an
and must have spoken Quechua, for the three of them baptized
11
understand them, most likely through an interpreter from
coastal valleys, and the Sea. While maritime trade carried them
12
Maritime trade was made possible by the development of
13
they precipitate and the concentration is reduced drastically.
made since the Engoroy period around 800 B.C., and continued to
be made until the arrival of the Pizarro and his men to the Coast
14
Mexico, as well as South American "Harinoso de ocho" maize. It
15
1
Peter Stahl (1995)
2
Stothert (1988)
3
Thais (Vasula) melones (2.6%), Thais (Stramonita) chocolata (1.3%) and Purpura
pansa (1.1%) were used the same way that other species of murices were used in the
Mediterranean sea. At the type-site (G-31) increasing numbers of Thais crassa ,
another murice, appear at the end of Valdivia A, augmenting during Valdivia B, and
being most popular during Valdivia C, where it reached a 2.6% level of popularity.
Other colors, from deep-brown to tan, were obtained from several varieties of native
cotton (Gossipiun barbadense) that still grow in the area.
4
It is important to point out here that, at the Archaic Period Vegas site (G-80)
Stothert (1988:192) identified the purple dyeing murices conch Thais kioskiformis, ,
suggesting that this practice might have begun in the Late Archaic between 8000 and
6000 years ago.
5
Lenz-Volland and Volland, (1986), Marcos, (1995b).
6
Lathrap, Marcos and Zeidler (1977)
7
Kleppinger, Khun and Thomas (1977)
8
This thin, yellowish-red ware, originally called Protomachalilla by Lathrap and by
Zeilder, noted Zeidler, is somewhat similar to the Machalilla Incised and Punctated
type defined by Meggers, Evans and Estrada (1965: plate 144 w-z; plate 147 e-f) and
to Porras (1977) type “M” Alausí Zone Punctated. However, these vessel shapes are
quite different from the Real Alto sample (Zeidler, op. cit.) and both Lippi and Bischof
have not found them in the Machalilla sequence.
Because there is no close similarity between this thin yellowish-red ware with any
actual Machalilla ceramic complex, it is felt that the use of Protomachalilla to identify
this unique Real Alto ware should be dropped in favor of another label. I have
proposed elsewhere (Marcos and Michzynski, 1996) to identify this ware by the
geographic name for the bluff where Real Alto is located, Loma del Mogote. Refering
to it as Mogote ware; calling the undecorated samples Mogote thin yellowish-red
ware, and the decorated ones Early Cotocollao ceramics corresponding to
Formal Class I Curvilineal Incised Punctate (Villalba, 1988:fig 87, plate 2 k, l) and
Formal Class II Incised Zoned Punctate (ibid:fig 92, plate 8 a-e, j, ñ), are other
similarity worthy of note.
9
Marcos (1992)
10
The mineral fraction in ceramic on the Santa Elena Peninsula and the western Guayas
is quite distinct from those found in Mogote ceramics. X-ray diffraction and polarized
light petrographic analysis showed that the non-plastic fraction in the Mogote
samples was made up of volcanic materials - zoned plagioclase, clean-transparent
quartz, abundant basaltic hornblende and, sporadically, olivine and garnet. The size of
the non-plastic component is also different in Mogote shards, being larger than in the
Valdivia, Machalilla and Chorrera samples from the Santa Elena Peninsula. In this,
Mogote ceramics resemble the Sierra Formative ceramics, like Cotocollao and La
Mena, in the valley of Quito, or the Cerro Narrio, Chaullabamba or Pirinkay complexes
of the southern Sierra. This is due to the erosive process, which is different in the
Sierra because the shorter distance geological materials are transported, while in the
Coast, minerals travel through white-water rivers and waterfalls, down the Andes and
along the coastal plain throughout the Guayas riverine system. Further microscopic
comparison between Mogote and Sierra ceramics showed a clear affinity in fabric with
those from the valley of Quito, being quite distinct from those of the southern Sierra,
which fabric is made up of kaolin mixed with small quantities of montmorillonite .
Surface treatment and decoration of the thin (2.5-3 mm.), yellowish-red, incised and
punctated, Mogote ware (c.2000-1800 BC) resemble the later (1500-800 BC), thicker,
brownish-red, linear incised and punctated component of the Early Cotocollao style,
suggesting that an earlier antecedent may have been manufactured 500 years before,
somewhere in the Valley of Quito.
The associated obsidian blades also were from the Quito valley, G. Bigazzi of The
Institute of Geochronology and Isotopic Chemistry, National Research Council, Pisa,
Italy, studied seven samples of obsidian, five were collected in the Chanduy area and
two came from the Valdivia 8 levels at San Isidro, Manabí. The provenience of the two
samples associated with Valdivia 7 and Mogote ceramics from Real Alto according to
Biggazzi is the Loma Quiscatola flow in the Cordillera Real.
Ceramic source area analysis was carried out at the Archaeological Materials Service,
Geology Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. While, obsidian blades
were treated by G. Bigazzi at the Geochemical Isotope Laboratory, Pisa, Italy.
11
Sherrat, (1976:558-560).
12
McEwan (1982, 1992); Currie (1995a, 1995b, 1997).
13
Guinea (1982, 1994), Marcos (1995).
14
Mudd (n.d.), Tobar (1988).
15
Marcos (1995), Zevallos (1992)
16
Jorge Juan( [1711], In Ulloa, 1760: 190-193).
17
Hosler, (1994); Wellhousen, et. al. (1957); Coe (1960); Bischof (1982); Zuidema
(1977/78).
18
Beltrán (1997).