Vol 4-Instructional Plan
Vol 4-Instructional Plan
Vol 4-Instructional Plan
YEAR/ MONTH
DAY
2014/MARCH 2014/APRIL 2014/MAY 2014/JUNE
SUNDAY 2 9 16 23 30 SD 6 13 20 27 SD 4 11 18 25 SD 1 8 15 22 29
MONDAY 3 10 17 24 31 MD 7 14 21 28 MD 5 12 19 26 MD 2 9 16 23 30
TUESDAY 4 11 18 25 TD 1 8 15 22 29 TD 6 13 20 27 TD 3 10 17 24
WEDNESDAY 5 12 19 26 WD 2 9 16 23 30 WD 7 14 21 28 WD 4 11 18 25
THURSDAY 6 13 20 27 TRD 3 10 17 24 TRD 1 8 15 22 29 TRD 5 12 19 26
FRIDAY 7 14 21 28 FD 4 11 18 25 FD 2 9 16 23 30 FD 6 13 20 27
SATURDAY 1 8 15 22 29 STD 5 12 19 26 STD 3 10 17 24 31 STD 7 14 21 28
YEAR/ MONTH
DAY
2014/JULY 2014/AUGUST 2014/SEPTEMBER 2014/OCTOBER
SUNDAY 6 13 20 27 SD 3 10 17 24 31 SD 7 14 21 28 SD 5 12 19 26
MONDAY 7 14 21 28 MD 4 11 18 25 MD 1 8 15 22 29 MD 6 13 20 27
TUESDAY 1 8 15 22 29 TD 5 12 19 26 TD 2 9 16 23 30 TD 7 14 21 28
WEDNESDAY 2 9 16 23 30 WD 6 13 20 27 WD 3 10 17 24 WD 1 8 15 22 29
THURSDAY 3 10 17 24 31 TRD 7 14 21 28 TRD 4 11 18 25 TRD 2 9 16 23 30
FRIDAY 4 11 18 25 FD 1 8 15 22 29 FD 5 12 19 26 FD 3 10 17 24 31
SATURDAY 5 12 19 26 STD 2 9 16 23 30 STD 6 13 20 27 STD 4 11 18 25
Note:
Effective Days: 151Days
Page |2
II. LEGEND
NO SYMBOL INFORMATION
1. Thesis proposal examination
2. Revision
4. Experts’ validation
5. Preliminary testing
10 Easter Hoilday
III.
Page |3
ALLOCATED WEEKS
I. WEEKS OF THE STUDY
Even Semester
TOTAL OF
NO MONTH
WEEK
1 2 3
1 MARCH -
2 APRIL 3 WEEKS
3 MAY 4 WEEKS
4 JUNE 4 WEEKS
TOTAL 11 WEEKS
NO ACTIVITIES TOTAL
1 2 3
1 Preliminary testing. 2 WEEKS
2 Doing first revision 2 WEEKS
3 Main Field testing 4 WEEKS
TOTAL 8 WEEKS
Total of the effective week– Total of ineffective week = 8 weeks - 1 week (Easter Holiday) = 7
effective weeks.
Total of the effective week multiplies time allotment in a class meeting = 7 weeks x 2 hours=
14 hours.
Legend: One class meeting per week. Time allotment of a class meeting is 2 hours (120
minutes)
Page |5
Purpose
Writing III offers the students knowledge on “Descriptive Text”, one among the text types.
Having gained learning, it is expected that they will pass on the subject with the following
abilities, namely:
First, being critical thinkers in researching descriptive text.
Second, having knowledge and skills in descriptive text writing.
Student Profile
Viewed through socio-cultural background, the fourth semester students come from
different ethnic groups with their language, belief, custom, and specific cultural item.
Next, on academic background, some students are good in grammar, yet weak in
expressing things into well-organized texts. Conceerning this fact, what they need to know
is how language works through the body of descriptive to make meaning. Having this
ability in mind, students would be enabled to write descriptive text which might meet to
readers’ expectation.
Page |7
Text, they would have had prior knowledge on how language features are there for
making meanings through the flow of text organization. The last material is Steps of
writing process. Students would be boosted to write due to the processes.
The last developed document is students’ worksheets. These are guidelines for
students to get things done in the classroom, concerning the goals of applying formative
tests as well as home works. Through this document, students would internalize and
having such an objective appropriation upon each piece of materials. Additionally, there
are evaluating instruments, attached to each worksheet. The instruments provide rubrics
and procedures for gaining and deciding the students’ learning achievement.
Page |9
Polishing
Writing
Prewriting
SYLLABUS
NAME OF DEPARTMENT : BAHASA INGGRIS-UKAW KUPANG
COURSE : WRITING III
CLASS/SEMESTER : ….. / IV
CORE COMPETENCY : By the end of the course, students would have a critical thinking and practical skills in differing various text types.
TIME ALLOTMENT : 12 HOURS (6 CLASS MEETINGS)
BASIC TIME
INDICATORS MATERIALS LEARNING EXPERIENCE ASSESSMENT ALLOTMENT REFERENCES
COMPETENCES
Building Knowledge of
(Descriptive) Text (BKOF)
2.1. Stud 2.1.1. Students are 1. Cohesion and Lecturing Cognitive: 1 class 1, 4-6
ents would able to classify Coherence of Reading: Find a local culture- meeting
be able to to others, Descriptive Text based descriptive text,
Investigating the features
identify the features of 1.1. Features of then, identify features
of cohesion in
cohesion and cohesion of of cohesion and
features of ““Cultural Heritage of
coherence in the descriptive text: coherence accurately.
cohesion descriptive texts. Sumba Island”, a local
and o Lexical culture-based descriptive
coherence cohesion text from Sumba – NTT. Affective:
in each type o Grammatical Observation on the
of texts. cohesion features of cohesion
o Rhetorical and coherence in
cohesion ““Cultural Heritage
Investigating the features of Sumba Island”, the
of coherence in local culture-based
1.2. Features of “Cultural Heritage of descriptive text, using
coherence of Sumba Island”. rating scale.
descriptive text:
o Micro level Motor Skill:
coherence
Performance in
o Macro level presenting the
coherence investigation above.
P a g e | 11
References: Books:
1. Azar, B. S. (1993). Understanding and using English grammar. 2nd Ed. Jakarta: Bina Rupa Aksara.
2. Derewianka, B. 2011. A New Grammar Companion: For Teachers. 2nd Ed. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association, e: lit.
3. Droga, L., & Humphrey, S. 2003. Grammar and Meaning: an introduction for primary teachers. New South Wales: Southwood
Press Pty. Ltd.
4. Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. 2007. Introduction to Academic Writing. 3rd Ed. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
5. Published and unpublished references containing local culture-based descriptive texts (folkltales, legends, myths, heritage spots,
ceremonies, music, dances, and storybooks2, etc).
6. Thornbury, S. 2007. Beyond the sentence: Introducing Discourse Analysis.Oxford: Macmillan Books for Teachers.
Yakob Metboki
2003512039
2
Storybooks are available at the library of English Study Program of UKAW, Jl. Adi Soecipto, PO BOX. 147, Kupang – NTT.
P a g e | 12
Yakob Metboki
2003512039
3
The operational behaviours are taken from Miller, Linn, & Gronlund (2009: 527-532).
P a g e | 13
BASIC TIME
SMTR CODE SUB COMPETENCES
COMPETENCES
Even 45
Pretest
minutes
01 Cohesion and Coherence of Descriptive 90 minutes
Text (1 CM4)
Features of Cohesion
Accurate investigation of features of
lexical cohesion in local culture-based
descriptive text.
Students would Accurate investigation of features of
be able to grammatical cohesion in local culture-
identify the based descriptive text.
features of Accurate investigation of features of
Rhetorical cohesion in local culture-
cohesion and
based descriptive text.
coherence in each
type of texts. Features of Coherence
Accurate investigation of features of
micro level coherence in local culture-
based descriptive text.
Accurate investigation of features of
macro level coherence in local culture-
based descriptive text.
02 Features of Descriptive Text 90 minutes
Students would be Explaining the social purpose of local (1 CM)
able to examine culture –based descriptive text.
each type of texts Illustrating the generic structure of
due to their local culture –based descriptive text.
purposes, generic Classifying the language features of
structures, and local culture –based descriptive text.
lexicogrammatical
features. 03 What makes it a descriptive text?
Crictically, assessing non-descriptive.
4
CM stands for class meeting.
P a g e | 14
Writing
Posttest 45
minutes
Total 3 Hours,
30
Minutes
(4 CMs),
1 hour
and 10
minutes
tests.
Yakob Metboki
2003512039
P a g e | 15
SEMESTRAL PROGRAM
Features of Coherence
Accurate investigation of features of micro level 100%
coherence in local culture-based descriptive text.
Accurate investigation of features of macro level
coherence in local culture-based descriptive text.
Pretest-Posttest
Easter Holiday
Semarang, March 2014
Researcher
P a g e | 18
Yakob Metboki
2003512039
(MEETING 1)
I. LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students would work out the following points:
- Accurate investigation of features of lexical cohesion in local culture-based descriptive text.
- Accurate investigation of features of grammatical cohesion in local culture-based descriptive text.
- Accurate investigation of features of rhetorical cohesion in local culture-based descriptive text.
- Accurate investigation of features of micro level coherence in local culture-based descriptive text.
- Accurate investigation of features of macro level coherence in local culture-based descriptive text.