19th-Century West Africa Jihad Reform Go
19th-Century West Africa Jihad Reform Go
19th-Century West Africa Jihad Reform Go
Kate Penniall
HST2039S
Tutorial 5 – West African Jihads
known as the jihad reforms, fostered a seperation, expansion and creation of new Islamic
caliphates that helped to transform West Africa into a part of the dar al-Islam. This essay will
discuss the goals of the jihad reform movements as well as to what extent the jihads of the
In many historical depictions of the jihad movements written in modern times, the
term jihad is exclusively used to described the warfare Islamic tribes used to establish their
new Muslim states. Murray Last, however, makes a clear distinction in saying that the jihad
should not be considered a warfare “against, but as a struggle for.”1 Prior to the nineteenth
freedoms were repressed by kings. The governmental structure by Muslim judgement, lacked
an authentic Islamic authority.2 The extent of the oppression of the Muslim people and their
religion is not known, but it must have been enough to create “bitter resentment” among
Muslims, so much so that Muslim scholars saw no alternative but a complete social reform
inorder to restore Islamic justice.3 Their goal at the start of the nineteenth century, in the
creation of the Sokoto and Masina caliphates, was to build “a new society in which religion
It was the Sokoto and Masina caliphates that, to a great extent, succeeded in creating
these new societies but later movements by other jihad leaders largely failed to achieve a
successful “new society.” The success of Shaikh ‘Uthman b. Fudi in creating the Sokoto
1
Last, Murray. 1967. Reform in West Afirca: the Jihad movements of the
nineteenth century. 1.
2
Robinson, David. Revolutions in the Western Sudan. 132.
3
Last, Murray. 1967. Reform in West Afirca: the Jihad movements of the
nineteenth century. 4.
4
Ibid, 3.
caliphate and Ahmad Lobbo in Masina, was largely due to the respect they held as teachers
and scholars of Islam, a rise in the Muslim population, an increased awareness of the
corruption against Islamic law and a widespread belief in the coming of the Mahdi, which in
Islam marked the end of the world.5 The jihad reform that took place in both Sokoto and
Masina were violent, but the Muslim armies created under Shaikh and Lobbo had no
weaponry and lacked sufficient supply of food which made their plights at overthrowing
corrupt government bodies increasingly difficult. With early defeats, the new Muslim
regimes had to broaden their definition of Muslim to include amana or “proctected people.”
These peoples were well-disposed to the Muslims and not strictly against the Shaikh or
regarded as non-Muslims.6 After several hard fought battles, the increase in Muslim followers
who aided in the fight for their relgious freedom helped the jihad regimes finally take over
Gobir and Bambara to create the new Sokoto and Masina caliphates respectively.
Once Muslims had attained their new society, it was the “reorganisation of the
administration and the creation of Muslim types of government” that formed the final phases
of the jihad reform movements. In the Sokoto caliphate it was the Shaikh’s model of
administration that became the dominant form of Islamic authority. Under his administration,
Shaikh agents became the emirs of provinces, judges were appointed to advise and administer
full Islamic Law, tax-collectors became responsible for specific taxes, inspectors made sure
public welfare was not infringed upon and imams lead public prayers and taught Islam to the
people of the Caliphate.7 Although Shaikh identified his emirs from all different clans and
classes, they “tended to form an interregional elite.” Eqaulity amongst the caliphate was
retained through the equality of equipment. With a lack of weaponry to demonstrate power,
emirs and other political officials “relied on the cooperation of their subordinates for the
5
Ibid, 6.
6
Ibid, 9.
7
Ibid, 11.
application of their authority.”8 This system of checks and balances between the
administrative bodies and their subordinates helped to create a successful new Islamic society
that fostered Islamic Law as the highest authority and afforded the Muslim people a freedom
The creation of the Masina caliphate differed from Sokoto in that the “extent and
diversity of people and the duration and intensity of the war were less great.” This created a
greater priority in the creation of a “centrally organised Muslim state out of a diffuse pastoral
society.”9 The administrative structure of the Masina caliphate, headed by a Council of Forty,
was similar to the structure of the Sokoto, with appointed judges, tax-collectors, inspectors
and army officers reaching down to the local village levels. In order to ensure the honesty of
these officials and private citizens, a state spy system was created. In addition, a heightened
emphasis on armed services and state granaries helped to unite and provide for inhabitants of
the caliphate. With an efficient security system, the Masina caliphate was successfully able to
supply it’s inhabitants with both “the worldly and spiritual needs of its people.”10
In the later part of the nineteenth century, Al-haff Umar arose as a respected Islamic
scholar and teacher. After his pilgrimage to Mecca, Umar returned to west Africa forming a
new Tijaniyya brotherhood along the way. Under his regime, Umar attracted wide support for
his new brotherhood in the wake of the success of the Sokoto and Masina caliphates by way
of an increased excitement for the imminent end of the world. Umar’s regimes however, were
comparatively small so to make his regimes more effective, Umar imported guns and powder
which marked the first use of weaponry by a jihad reform army.11 Their goal as a jihad reform
Umar’s armies were able to overtake the traditional armies of the Masina caliphate and settle
8
Ibid, 13.
9
Ibid, 13.
10
Ibid, 16-17.
11
Ibid, 19.
12
Ibid, 21.
as “the permanent rulers of the new caliphate.”13 Unfortunately however, in 1863 after just
one year of Umarian rule, the Masinanke organized a revolt to take back their empire,
defeating and killing Umar in 1864. The revolt took a tole on the caliphate, resulting in many
casualties on both sides and a destruction in the prosperity of the caliphate. This catastrophe
resulted in the “damage (of) the unity and practice of Islam.”14 After Umar’s death and the
resulting revolts fought between opposing jihads, the administration in the caliphate “did not
have the time to develop policies of social and political reform for the societies it
governed.”15
The rsie and revolt of jihads during the nineteenth century in west Africa marked a
transformative period that ultimately identified this area as part of the dar-al Islam. The goals
of the jihad were largely a reaction to the oppression of the Muslim people and their religion
during the eighteenth and nineteenth century. Jihad movements set out to establish new
societies that ran under Islamic Law authority and fostered religious freedom for Muslims.
The jihad efforts in forming the Sokoto and Masina caliphate were largely successful, but the
jihad movements of Umar and his regime, with superior weaponry and a division between
jihads, resulted in the downfall of the overall jihad movement. While the efforts to create new
societies was only relatively successful, the jihad reform movements were not all together
unsuccessful. They established an Islamic identity and fostered the expansion of Islamic
education across western Africa to create a heightened sense of belonging to the dar-al Islam
in this area.
13
Ibid, 21.
14
Robinson, David. Revolutions in the Western Sudan. 143.
15
Last, Murray. 1967. Reform in West Afirca: the Jihad movements of the
nineteenth century. 4.