TECHOP

TECHOP
TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE

(TECHOP)
TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)
COMPETENCY ELEMENTS FOR
DP PROFESSIONALS - DP SMEs / DP FMEA
PRACTITIONERS
APPENDIX 1
PART 2
(COMPETENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR DP SMEs)
MARCH 2019
(INTERIM)
TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 1

TECHOP
DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

The information presented in this publication of the Dynamic Positioning Committee of the Marine
Technology Society (‘DP Committee’) is made available for general information purposes without
charge. The DP Committee does not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of this
information. Any reliance you place on this publication is strictly at your own risk. We disclaim all liability
and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on this publication by you or anyone who may be
informed of its contents.
Nothing in this TECHOP precludes companies from developing their own competency schemes which:
1. Meet their own needs and / or their client’s expectations.
2. Meets or exceeds the intent of this TECHOP.
IN NO EVENT WILL THE DP COMMITTEE AND/OR THE MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY, THEIR
AFFILIATES, LICENSORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, EMPLOYEES, VOLUNTEERS, AGENTS,
OFFICERS, OR DIRECTORS BE LIABLE FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND UNDER ANY LEGAL
THEORY, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION IN
THIS PUBLICATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERSONAL INJURY, PAIN AND
SUFFERING, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF
BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED SAVINGS, LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF GOODWILL, LOSS OF DATA,
AND WHETHER CAUSED BY TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), BREACH OF CONTRACT OR
OTHERWISE, EVEN IF FORESEEABLE.
THE FOREGOING DOES NOT AFFECT ANY LIABILITY WHICH CANNOT BE EXCLUDED OR
LIMITED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW.
2 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP
SUMMARY
This MTS TECHOP provides general guidance on subjects with which prospective DP SMEs should
become proficient in order to be effective in contributing to the delivery of incident free DP operations
with predictable outcomes.

TECHOP
CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1 DP SME COMPETENCE OVERVIEW 6
1.1 COMPETENCE 6
1.2 PROFICIENCY SCALE 6
1.3 DISTRIBUTION OF PROFICIENCY LEVELS 6
1.4 PROOF POINTS 6
2 CORE DP COMPETENCIES 8
2.1 DEFINITIONS 8
2.2 ELEMENTS OF COMPETENCE 8
2.3 ASSESSMENT OF COMPETENCE 8
2.4 PREPARATION 8
3 DEFINITIONS 9
3.1 COMP 1. DELIVERABLES AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS 9
3.2 COMP 2. BARRIER PHILOSOPHY – DEFENSE IN DEPTH 9
3.3 COMP 3. DP CONCEPTS 10
3.4 COMP 4. DP GUIDANCE 11
3.5 COMP 5. VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION 12
3.6 COMP 6. IN EXECUTION SUPPORT 13
3.7 COMP 7. IMPACTS OF INDUSTRIAL MISSION ON STATION KEEPING 13
3.8 COMP 8. IMPACTS OF STATION KEEPING ON INDUSTRIAL MISSION 14
3.9 COMP 9. INTERFACE MANAGEMENT 14
4 MISCELLANEOUS 16
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A EXAMPLE ASSESSMENT PROCESS
A.1 EXAMPLE ASSESSMENT INTERVIEW
A.2 EXAMPLE ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW
A.3 SUGGESTED ASSESSOR INSTRUCTIONS
A.4 OPENING THE EXERCISE
A.5 ASKING QUESTIONS
A.6 CLOSING THE EXERCISE
A.7 AFTER THE EXERCISE
A.8 EVALUATING EVIDENCE
A.9 QUESTION, RESPONSE AND SCORING
APPENDIX B PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DP SMES
B.1 THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DP PERSONNEL
TABLES
Table 1 Detailed Proof Points 7

TECHOP
ABBREVIATIONS
ASOG Activity Specific Operating Guidelines
CAM Critical Activity Mode
IJS Independent Joy Stick
IRM Inspection Repair and Maintenance
MDAT Mapping Delivery Ability Tool (now known as PDDP2)
OCIMF Oil Companies International Marine Forum
PDDP2 Professional Development of DP Personnel (formally MDAT)
PMOE Principal Marine Operations Engineer
PRS Position Reference Systems
SIMOPS Simultaneous Operations
SMEs Subject Matter Experts
TAGOS Thruster and Generator Operating Strategy
TAM Task Appropriate Mode
TECHOP Technical and Operational Guidance
WSOG Well Specific Operating Guidelines

TECHOP
1 DP SME COMPETENCE OVERVIEW

1.1 COMPETENCE
1.1.1 Competence can be described as the appropriate combination of skill, knowledge,
experience and behaviors. This guide describes technical competence requirements for
those undertaking the role of Subject Matter Expert (SME) for Dynamic Positioning (DP) or
aspiring to be a SME for DP.
1.2 PROFICIENCY SCALE

1.2.1 The purpose of the proficiency scale is to provide a consistent framework that enables those
responsible for ensuring competence to, assess and provide feedback to those undertaking
the role of DP SME.
1.2.2 There are three levels of proficiency described as:
• Knowledgeable
• Skilled
• Mastery
1.2.3 Knowledgeable: This level allows questions to be asked of specialists. Work can be
undertaken with assistance.
1.2.4 Skilled: At this level, skill allows assigned tasks to be undertaken with a minimum of
assistance.
1.2.5 Mastery: This level permits diagnosis, troubleshooting and complex problem solving.
Development and implementation of best practice, standards and guides. Ability to
objectively evaluate alternate proposals with a strong emphasis on predictable outcomes.
1.2.6 There are two further levels which may be assigned during the assessment which are Aware
and Not Aware. Neither of these levels is considered to contribute to the competency
required to be a DP SME.
1.3 DISTRIBUTION OF PROFICIENCY LEVELS

1.3.1 DP SMEs must have 9 core competencies at the following levels or higher:
• 4 Mastery
• 3 Skill
• 2 Knowledgeable
1.3.2 Of the four competencies required at the level of Mastery, the following three are mandatory:
• Deliverables / decision support tools
• DP guidance
• Barrier philosophy
1.4 PROOF POINTS

1.4.1 Table 1 provides a more detailed guide to the expectations at each proficiency level.

TECHOP
Table 1 Detailed Proof Points
What can be expected from a DP SME at each skill level:
Level Proof Points

Knowledge • Able to interpret and evaluate information and advice from experts in an area of expertise.
• Able to use the correct terminology (vocabulary) of the area of expertise.
• Able to hold an informed debate with experts in the area of expertise.
• Able to ask questions that test the viability of proposals in an area of expertise.
• Able to carry out some of the activities with help.
Skill • Able to perform consistently and satisfactorily the majority of activities of an area of expertise.
• Able to translate guidelines and standards for the area of expertise into practical actions.
• Able to solve imaginatively, common technical/operational problems in the area of expertise.
• Able to guide and advise others in technical/operational aspects of the areas of expertise.
Mastery • Troubleshoot / adapt / evaluate alternate and / or novel solutions objectively.
• Be able to diagnose and resolve significant complex, non-routine problems in the area of expertise.
• Able to creatively solve significant, complex, non-routine problems in the area of expertise.
• Able to adapt practices from other markets or countries for use in the area of expertise.
• Able to generate substantial improvements to local practices and procedures for the areas of
expertise.
• Demonstrate experience in applying technical and operational expertise to achieve business
objectives safely and predictably.
• The ability to objectively evaluate proposals (including alternate solutions) or offer alternative
solutions and risk mitigations to resolve DP-related issues.
NOTE: It is acknowledged that all the required competencies would be difficult for one individual to
demonstrate proficiency at a Mastery level. It is expected that gaps in proficiency levels if identified could
be closed through access to competent personnel in possession of documented competencies at the
appropriate level of proficiency. It is anticipated that the above would be applicable to practitioners
tasked with management of DP activities. As such a conclusion of competence can only exist while
access to competent resources remains. (It is expected that personnel delivering in-depth technical
support would possess the identified competencies commensurate with the stipulated proficiency level).

TECHOP
2 CORE DP COMPETENCIES
2.1 DEFINITIONS
2.1.1 There are 9 core DP competencies. These are:
1. Deliverables and decision support tools
2. Barrier philosophy & defense in depth
3. DP concepts
4. DP guidance & basis of requirements
5. Verification and validation
6. In execution support
7. Impacts on station keeping on the industrial mission
8. Impacts of the industrial mission on station keeping
9. Defining, identifying and managing interfaces relevant to DP station keeping
Note 1: Items in RED font above are competencies that require a mandatory level of Mastery for a
DP SME. One other must be obtained at level Mastery.
Note 2: Competence on scale level of Mastery includes the ability to objectively evaluate alternate
proposals with a strong emphasis on predictable outcomes (applicable to all 9
competencies).
2.2 ELEMENTS OF COMPETENCE

2.2.1 Within each competence there are three elements which indicate the ability to:
• Assess / Evaluate
• Define / Specify
• Execute
Detailed definitions for the 9 core DP competencies are given in Appendix A.
2.3 ASSESSMENT OF COMPETENCE

2.3.1 Competence will be assessed through a combination of:
• Interview – this document
• Observation
• Formal written assessment (for SMEs desiring to be assessed on technical
competence) – Separate Exercise on Review of DP Redundancy Concept. Available
from the PMOE.
2.3.2 Details of the interview process are given in Appendix A.
2.3.3 Note: This competence assessment is heavily weighted towards technical competence and
not limited to behavioral competence. One of the two assessors is expected to have the
necessary depth and breadth of technical and operational knowledge to undertake an
effective assessment.
2.4 PREPARATION
2.4.1 Candidates are expected to receive coaching and mentoring during their day to day work
and undertake self-study using the Professional Development of DP Personnel (PDDP2)
Tool provided in Appendix B and relevant MTS TECHOPs where applicable.
2.4.2 NOTE: Topics listed in the tables as Coaching and Mentoring will be facilitated through a
TECHOP (to be generated and published through MTS DP G&S subcommittee).

TECHOP
3 DEFINITIONS
3.1 COMP 1. DELIVERABLES AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS
3.1.1 Definition
3.1.1.1 Deliver as a subject matter expert and provide guidance on the following decision support
tools and elements of such tools:
• Activity Specific Operating Guidelines (ASOG)
• Critical Activity Mode (CAM)
• Task Appropriate Mode (TAM)
• Criteria (Post failure capabilities, rationalization of yellows etc.)
• Configuration (Permissible configurations of DP system - Power generation,
distribution, propulsion, position reference sensors, external interfaces, external
influences etc.)
• Modes and features required for industrial mission.
• Thruster and Generator Operating Strategy (TAGOS)
3.1.2 Assess / Evaluate
3.1.2.1 Ability to review and identify issues associated with the scope and depth of ASOGs
3.1.3 Define / Specify
3.1.3.1 Identify the level of detail required to be embedded in decision support tools
3.1.4 Execute
3.1.4.1 Be able to create an ASOG for any type of DP vessel and activity.
3.1.4.2 Evaluate contractor provided ASOGs for completeness and identify the remedial work
required if necessary.
NOTE: The ability to create an ASOG could be supplemented by access to competent
personnel. (Demonstrated to be competent by this process)
3.2 COMP 2. BARRIER PHILOSOPHY – DEFENSE IN DEPTH

3.2.1 Definition
3.2.1.1 Knowledge and application of ‘Barrier Philosophies’ for risk management evaluation of
effective training, contingency plans and defense-in-depth of barriers (pertinent to DP station
keeping)
3.2.2 Assess/ Evaluate
3.2.2.1 Evaluate the suitability of barriers already in place such as:
• Barriers to prevent loss of position
• CAM
• Operate within Post Worst Case Failure Capability
• Use of IJS
• Barriers to prevent IRM on DP equipment.
• Operational restrictions as a barrier.
• Provisions for positioning standby.
• The need for and imposition of project specific simulator requirements.
NOTE: Principles of CAM and operating within post failure capability are considered to be
hard barriers to loss of position where as operational restrictions are considered as a soft
barrier. Additional management is required for soft barriers to be effective.

TECHOP

• Specify the type of barriers required for a particular activity
• Specify when project specific simulators are required for intended activities.
• Evaluate project specific simulator proposals for meeting intent and objective
• Engage with relevant SMEs for input into project specific simulator training
3.2.4 Execute
3.2.4.1 Create robust activity / mission specific barriers.
3.3 COMP 3. DP CONCEPTS

3.3.1 Definition
3.3.1.1 Knowledge and application of DP Concepts - Deliver as a subject matter expert and
knowledge resource on essential concepts associated with dynamic positioning:
• Dynamic Positioning Theory and Practice
• Basis of Confidence
• DP Redundancy
• Seven Pillars
• Post failure capability
3.3.2.1 Be able to articulate the concepts listed above and below and their importance to DP.
Evaluate the extent to which others are able to understand these concepts and the
significance of their ability or inability to do so.
• Basic principles of dynamic positioning
• Drift off
• Drive off
• Force off
• Fault Tolerance
• Redundancy
• Reliability
• Resilience
• Predictability
• Fail safe
• Performance
• Protection
• Detection
• Cross connections
• External interfaces
• External influences
• Independent performance validation
3.3.3.1 Define and specify which of these concepts are required to be emphasized for specific
industrial missions.

TECHOP
3.3.4 Execute
3.3.4.1 Be able to determine who should have an adequate understanding of these concepts within
vessel crews and owner’s organization.
3.3.4.2 Be able to use the following MTS gap analysis tools:
• DP System FMEA
• DP FMEA proving trials
• DP Operations Manual
• Annual DP trials
• RP D102 System FMEA gap analysis tool.
3.3.4.3 Be able to mine and extract relevant DP related information from diverse sources (Example:
MTS DP committee, IMCA, Marine Forums, Recommended Practices, OCIMF etc.)
3.4 COMP 4. DP GUIDANCE

3.4.1 Definition
3.4.1.1 Knowledge of:
• Company DP standards / requirements (when available)
• OCIMF DP Assurance Framework
• Industry guidance - IMO, MTS & IMCA Guidance.
3.4.2.1 Be able to use industry guidance documents to assess levels of implementation, application
or adherence to guidance and good practice contained therein. In particular, the SME should
be fully familiar with the concepts described in:
• Company DP standards / requirements (when available)
• OCIMF DP Assurance Framework
• IMO MSC 645 & 1580
• DNVGL RP E307
• DNVGL RP E306
• PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DP PERSONNEL (PDDP2) TOOL
• DNVGL RP D102
• IMCA M190 (When specifically referenced IMCA M190 revision June 2011)
• IMCA M191 (Now incorporated into M190, (When specifically referenced IMCA M191
revision Feb 2008)
• IMCA M220
• IMCA M225
• IMCA M182
• IMCA M166
• IMCA M117
• ALL TECHOPs (DP Incident Investigation TECHOP Specifically Emphasized)
Note: The written examination (SMEs - Technical Focus) covers relevant principles
contained within the above documents.

TECHOP

3.4.3.1 Be able to specify requirements pertinent to the industrial mission and consequences of a
loss of position.
3.4.4 Execute
3.4.4.1 Be able to evaluate the extent and efficacy of the implementation of the relevant guidance
as stipulated in the requirements.
3.5 COMP 5. VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

3.5.1 Definition
3.5.1.1 Be fully familiar with the purpose, objectives and practice of the verification and validation
activities applied in the management of DP vessels including:
• Annual DP Trials.
• FMEA Proving Trials.
• Post Event Verification Trials.
3.5.1.2 In particular, proficiency in the objective evaluation of:
• DP system FMEA.
• DP system FMEA gap analysis.
3.5.1.3 Understand:
• Purpose of FMEA proving trials.
• Purpose of annual DP trials.
• Findings categorizes and significance.
• Differences between and requirements for ‘Soak test’ & ‘Stress Test’.
3.5.1.4 Be proficient in:
• Effective onboard vessel engagements.
• Validation of efficacy of implemented processes.
• Evaluation of critical sparing philosophy of DP equipment.
3.5.2.1 Be able to assess the degree of completeness with which Annual DP trials, FMEA proving
trials and post event trials have been performed. In particular, whether or not they achieved
their objectives.
3.5.3.1 Requirements for effective review of DP FMEAs, DP FMEA proving trials and post event /
return to work authorization process.
3.5.3.2 Requirements for review and acceptance of effective gap closure proposals.
3.5.4 Execute
• Perform effective engagements with DP vessel crew and owner’s organization.
• Evaluate results of DP FMEA reviews, DP FMEA proving trials and post event / return
to work authorization process.
• Evaluate results of post event / return to work authorization process.

TECHOP
3.6 COMP 6. IN EXECUTION SUPPORT

3.6.1 Definition
3.6.1.1 Deliver as a subject matter expert and knowledge resource in response to requests for
assistance related to:
• Marine Operations involving DP station keeping.
• Incident investigations involving DP station keeping.
3.6.1.2 In particular:
• Response to ‘yellows’ and ‘reds’ as triggered by the ASOG/WSOG.
• Specifying analytical / engineering work relevant to impacts on station keeping.
• Return to work authorization.
• Responding to and resolving dilemmas.
3.6.2.1 Evaluate the relevance and applicability of the advice provided by other subject matter
experts.
3.6.3.1 Define engagements with other subject matter experts. Develop questions that need to be
asked and answered.
3.6.4 Execute:
3.6.4.1 Provide in-execution support when requested. Engage with other relevant subject matter
experts, vessel crew, project teams and owner’s organization in order to resolve issues and
progress the execution of marine operations and the industrial mission.
3.6.4.2 Perform DP incident investigations.
3.7 COMP 7. IMPACTS OF INDUSTRIAL MISSION ON STATION KEEPING

3.7.1 Definition
3.7.1.1 Identify, understand and communicate those elements of the industrial mission being
undertaken which impact upon DP station keeping.
3.7.2.1 Evaluate the suitability of the DP system functions and features for the specific activity to be
undertaken.
3.7.2.2 Determine whether aspects of the activity to be undertaken will impact the performance of
the DP system.
• Heavy lifting operations
• Riser pull-in
• Hold back vessels
• SIMOPS
• Shadowing of PRS
• Relative PRS and target vessel motions
• Gangway connected operations
• Impact of external forces on DP station keeping (Example: Moorings and Automatic
Thruster assist, hydrodynamics of leg length, forces imparted through legs on touching
bottom etc.)
3.7.2.3 Evaluate the need for particular types and combinations of position reference systems.

TECHOP

3.7.3.1 Define and specify industrial mission specific modes and features and any other
requirements. Develop questions (pertinent to impacts of industrial mission on station
keeping) that need to be asked and answered.
3.7.3.2 Be able to specify remedial actions.
3.7.4 Execute
3.7.4.1 Supervise activities requiring special DP station keeping modes functions and features and
advise on the conduct of the operations with reference to the stability of the DP system and
the security of the industrial mission.
3.8 COMP 8. IMPACTS OF STATION KEEPING ON INDUSTRIAL MISSION

3.8.1 Definition
3.8.1.1 Identify, understand and communicate the impacts of DP station keeping requirements on
the execution of the industrial mission.
3.8.2.1 Assess whether the activity is suitable for execution using DP station keeping,
consequences of loss of position, thruster wash, gangways, walk to work, shallow water
operations, automatic thruster assisted moorings.
3.8.2.2 Identify other options for carrying out the activity that might be more suitable.
3.8.3.1 Specify, modes functions and features for the activity to be undertaken using DP station
keeping, e.g. external force compensation, heavy lift mode, automatic thruster assisted
moorings, additional barriers if applicable.
3.8.4 Execute
3.8.4.1 Advise on the suitability of DP station keeping as a means of carrying out the specified
activity.
3.8.4.2 Advise on additional measures/ mitigations needed if DP station keeping is essential.
3.9 COMP 9. INTERFACE MANAGEMENT

3.9.1 Definition
3.9.1.1 Delivery of incident free DP operations is dependent on effective interface management
across a diverse group of stakeholders including non-DP domain stakeholders. Thus,
interface management has been identified as a key competence as it effects two other
competencies impacts of station keeping on industrial mission and impacts of industrial
mission on station keeping.
3.9.2.1 Identify interfaces that need to be managed.
3.9.2.2 Evaluate impacts to the delivery of DP operations.
3.9.2.3 Evaluate, develop and implement engagement plan (plan to identify extent and time of
engagement)
3.9.2.4 Evaluate the need to engage specialist resources and other subject matter experts:
• Vendor engagement.
• Requesting and managing specialist vendor support.
• Identifying need for and requesting/managing other subject matter experts (Not only
those with direct interfaces but also those that could influence outcomes).

TECHOP

3.9.3.1 Identify, define, specify impacts to or from station keeping from industrial mission in
consultation with relevant non-DP domain SMEs (Example Logistics-Aviation, Offshore
coordination team lead, OIM, Completions & Intervention Superintendents, Drilling
superintendents, Construction superintendents, Project Engineers, Business Opportunity
Managers, etc.)
3.9.4 Execute
• Engage with and oversee the activities of specialist vendors and subject matter
experts.
• Communicate pertinent information to relevant stakeholders.
• Minimize escalation of unforeseen events.
• Rationalize DP specific requirements against an integrated risk management strategy
based on system’s thinking - Professional Development of DP Personnel Tool
(PDDP2).
• Manage station keeping risk by balancing against overarching business / venture risk
in consultation with diverse and pertinent stakeholders.

TECHOP
4 MISCELLANEOUS
Stakeholders Impacted Remarks
MTS DP Committee To track and incorporate in next rev of MTS DP
 Guidance Documents
USCG MTS to communicate

ABS MTS to communicate

DNV GL MTS to communicate

Equipment vendor community
X MTS to engage with suppliers.
Consultant community MTS members to cascade/ promulgate.


Training institutions MTS members to cascade/ promulgate.

Vessel Owners/Operators Establish effective means to disseminate
 information to Vessel Management and Vessel
Operational Teams.
Vessel Establish effective means to disseminate
Management/Operational
teams
 information to Vessel Operational Teams.

TECHOP
APPENDICES
TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 Appendices

TECHOP
APPENDIX A EXAMPLE ASSESSMENT PROCESS
Appendix A TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP
A.1 Example Assessment Interview

Note: This Appendix A contains an example assessment process. It is envisaged that
companies will develop their own assessment processes that meet their needs and client’s
expectations.
• The DP SME Competence Assessment is designed to assess whether the nominated
candidate will be able to discharge the functions of a DP SME effectively in support of
the businesses objective of managing DP Station keeping risk. It is an assessment to
be conducted before a nominated individual is placed in the role of a DP SME. It is
not meant to replace the due diligence performed in selecting an individual for
nomination.
• After all scoring, has been completed; please indicate the final result here for data
entry purposes:
Overall Result (Tick One)
Competence gaps identified ☐ Competent ☐

• This assessment template includes a comprehensive assessment over a broad range
of identified DP competencies and each may include several possible questions. The
assessment questionnaire is designed to be flexible and allows the assessor to use
the questions judiciously to evaluate the skill level on the described scale. Assessors
may also add questions to the template in order to explore the candidate’s depth of
understanding of the subject matter.
• It is emphasized that the assessment is not designed to test what the candidate does
not know. On the contrary, it is designed to surface and build on what the candidate
does know.
• The subject matter contained in the assessment provides a road map for developing
required competencies for candidates aspiring to be DP SMEs.
• The topics addressed in the assessment template include the nine identified
competencies required of a DP SME.
A.2 Example Assessment Overview
• Candidates are asked to prepare for this assessment in advance using the
Professional Development of DP Personnel Tool in Appendix 2. The Candidate will be
asked to come prepared to discuss their competence and skill set as it relates to
managing DP Station Keeping risks, including the various Industry guidance
documents and company requirements on the subject matter.
• Through appropriate answers to the structured questions, the Candidate should be
able to demonstrate the necessary competence and skill per the described scale to
demonstrate ability to function as a DP SME.
• The aim is to assess the individual in the nine identified areas and to ensure skill level
can be consistently applied in the management of DP station keeping risk.
TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 Appendx A - 1

TECHOP
A.3 Suggested Assessor Instructions

• Two assessors should conduct the assessment. Assessors should be required to
complete Company Assessor Training prior to use of this assessment.
Before Interview Preparation
• Familiarize yourself with the structure of the assessment
process
• Review the questions and rating scales
• Determine whether additional assessors are needed
• Agree to assessor roles
During the Interview Collect Relevant Evidence from Candidate
• Welcome the Candidate – develop rapport
• Introduce yourself and describe the assessment structure
and process
• Ask clear, precise, and relevant questions, using follow-ups
to get full responses
• Take notes – be an active assessor
After the Interview Evaluate Candidate on Relevant Elements
• Review your notes – classify your evidence to the evaluation
dimensions
• Rate the Candidate
A.4 Opening the Exercise

• Spend 5 minutes setting up the interview and ensuring the Candidate is clear on the
process.
• Greet the Candidate, stating your name and role in the DP community.
• Ask the Candidate to do the same (name and role).
• Give an overview of the exercise plan, duration and process.
• State that you will be taking notes. Explain these notes will be used to ensure the
ratings are accurate and will not be retained for other purposes.
• Ensure that the Candidate is clear on the process.
• Ask if they have any initial questions.
• Remind the Candidate of the following points:
• they will try to discuss previous specific experience that they have been in, trying
wherever possible to keep to one situation per question.
• you may ask situational questions to explore DP SME competence: if the
Candidate has not encountered such experiences, they should advise the
assessor.
• Ask if the Candidate has any final questions before beginning.
A.5 Asking Questions
• Ensure you dedicate sufficient time to obtain evidence on the technical and operational
depth possessed by the candidate.
• Remember, you may need to ask follow-up questions to fully explore an issue. Some
questions may have already been answered in the initial presentation from the
Candidate, so be careful not to repeat them unnecessarily.
Appendx A - 2 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP
• Politely interrupt and re-direct the Candidate if the information they are providing is not
relevant to the assessment.
• Remember, you need to ensure they provide the information relevant to the scoring.
• Spend as much time as is necessary to build confidence in the competence of the
Candidate.
• At the end, thank the Candidate.
A.6 Closing the Exercise
• Allow 5-10 minutes to close the interview.
• Indicate that you’ve reached the end of your questions.
• Ask the Candidate to take a moment to consider whether they would like to add any
further information.
• Advise the Candidate that you will advise them of the outcome of the interview within
the next five working days. The interviewers will require time to review notes and
ensure agreement is reached on the outcome.
• Please evaluate the interview as soon after completion as possible following the
guidance on the following page.
A.7 After the Exercise
• After the exercise, review the evidence and complete the Evaluation Forms.
A.8 Evaluating Evidence
1. Look through the scale as listed on the rating matrix and tick the appropriate position
on the scale. Skill is rated in terms of five bands of performance.
2. To determine the overall score for a dimension, look at the position of the majority of
the ticks.
As a rough guide:
Not aware Most of the ticked responses are in the 1st column
Aware Most of the ticked responses are in the 2nd column
Knowledgeable Most of the ticked responses are in the 3rd column
Skilled(>K,<M) Most of the ticked responses are in the 4th column
Mastery Most of the ticked responses are in the 5th column
Avoid errors associated with halo/horns effect, central tendency, recency and stereotyping.
In addition, when evaluating evidence gained during an interview do not be influenced
disproportionately by the Candidate's ability or inability to talk persuasively and articulately
though the ability to communicate effectively is an essential skill for a DP SME.
See also Guide to Assigning Skill Levels on the Basis of Answers in the following
section.
TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 Appendx A - 3

TECHOP
A.9 Question, Response and Scoring
Guide to assigning skill levels on the basis of answers:
Always start by asking the main question which is generally broad in scope. No more
than nine questions should be required in each competency to arrive at a conclusion
regarding competence levels.
MASTERY - A candidate with mastery in the subject competency will speak fluently and be
able articulate all the main concepts associated with a particular subject without prompting
or recourse to asking follow-on questions. (that is to say they will mention many of the issues
which are the subject of the follow-on questions). The candidate will demonstrate that they
understand all or most of the issues at a conceptual, philosophical and practical level –
Mastery may be awarded on the basis of such a performance alone but further confidence
in the appropriateness of the categorization may be gained from the answers to follow on
questions.
SKILLED - A candidate who is skilled in the subject competence is likely to demonstrate a

sound understanding of the practical issues in the main question but may be less able
to articulate the philosophical and conceptual issues in the main question and may need to
be prompted to expand their answer to allow their understanding of the conceptual and
theoretical issues to be assessed. The score awarded to such a candidate is likely to be
influenced by their performance in the follow-on questions.
KNOWLEDGEABLE – A candidate who is knowledgeable in a particular competence may

give a fairly limited response in reply to the main questions but will be able to
demonstrate the scope of their knowledge by correctly answering most of the follow-on
questions in a manner that gives confidence they understand the practical importance of the
issues raised by the questions.
AWARE – A candidate who is only aware of issues within the subject competence is likely
to need significant prompting and use of follow-on questions to gain an understanding
of their knowledge. Their answers may be at a superficial level. They may struggle to answer
the main question. They may not be able to answer all the follow-on questions.
NOT AWARE – A candidate who is not aware will likely ask for the main question to be
repeated in a different way or be expanded or may state they have no knowledge of a
particular subject.
NOTE – FAILURE TO ACHIEVE MASTERY – When it becomes clear during the oral exam
that a candidate is not going to achieve Mastery in the four competencies required to be a
DP SME, the examiners should use the follow-on question to help develop a study plan to
address the gaps and assist the candidate in achieving the required competencies at the
next opportunity.
SUMMARY – The nature of the answer provided to the Main Question is likely to
influence the assignment of a particular skill level most strongly – The follow-on
questions will typically reinforce that assessment or improve the score of a candidate who
did poorly in the main question.
Appendx A - 4 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP
APPENDIX B PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DP SMES
Appendix B TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP
B.1 The Professional Development of DP Personnel
Information on the use of the professional development of DP personnel tool can be found in the
publication of the DP committee of the Marine Technology Society titled, ‘Guidance For Professional
Development of Personnel Engaged In DP Operations using the Professional Development of DP
Personnel Tool (PDDP2)’ - (PDDP2 was formerly known as MDAT).
The sections that follow provide tables for each of the nine core competencies that enable self-study.
Each table provides study guidelines in the form of lists of DP related subjects, associated industry
guidance and important terms and concepts with which the prospective DP SME should become familiar
and proficient.
Each table contains the following columns:
Themes Broad concept or subject.

Description A brief overview of the concept or subject to be studied. The information
is sufficient to allow the prospective DP SME to seek out more information
on the subject or start a conversation with colleagues.
Key Subject Matter Important terms, concepts and vocabulary.
Reference Where more information can be found. Typically, industry guidance or
other publications.
Competence Scale Prospective DP SMEs are encouraged to assess their own competence
levels. Two columns are provided. In the first column, the DP SME may
assign their own estimate. The second column may be used to record the
estimate based on conversations with mentors or from feedback given in
the assessment process.
Evidence The evidence column is used to collect evidence of competence. This
may be experiential, or a record of study undertaken to gain familiarity
and competency in a particular subject.
Appendx B - 1
TECHOP
Competence 1 - Deliverables and Decision Support Tools

Competence Scale Evidence
Themes Description Key Themes / Subject Matter Reference From

Self- Theory /
Competence Actions
Assessment Principles
Assessment
ASOG / WSOG 1. Activity Specific Operating ASOG / WSOG MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
Guidelines (ASOG) are a form of
decision support tool designed Watch circles MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
to assist crew in safely Riser analysis API RP16Q & Company Riser Analysis doc
managing the conduct of the DP
operation. The same tool is titled What-breaks-first? API RP 16Q & Company Riser Analysis doc
Well Specific Operating SIMOPS MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
Guidelines (WSOG) for use on
MODUs. Worst Case Failure Design Intent MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.13
2. Information is presented in a two Worst Case Failure MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.13
or four column format where
each column is associated with Post failure DP Capability (key ASOG element) MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.13
‘traffic light’ colors indicating DP
Capability plots MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 4,2
system status.
3. The four-column ‘Criteria’ Footprints MTS DP Ops Sec 1.2.12
section supports decision ASOG Development Process MTS DP Ops guidance document
making in response to events,
observation and environmental Statement of Verification If required / stipulated by Company
limits. The user is guided to
advise stakeholders, continuing Process for ASOG implementation Coaching and Mentoring as per Company standards
or suspend operations and Title Block – Background & Why Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
implement contingency plans.
Triggers for Yellow and Red MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
4. Green – Normal operations.
5. Blue – Abnormalities exist or Position References Sensors (key ASOG TECHOP_ODP_14_(D)_PRS & DPCS handling of PRS
limited are being approached element)
6. Yellow – Redundancy has been Modes and features (key ASOG element) MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 14.7
lost or is at defined operational
limits. Offset from wellhead MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.7
7. Red – Position is being lost or Drive off to drift off conversion DP Training Course / Company Requirement
contingency plan is in operation.
DP Alert / Traffic Lights – Colours (For ASOG) MTS DP Ops Appendix C
8. The two-column ‘configuration’
section is a go-no-go for being in Fault tolerance MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 2
Critical Activity Mode
configuration. Station keeping integrity MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.3
9. Green – Normal operations. Loss of position & position excursion MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 4.2
10. Blue – Risk assess and inform. Industrial mission MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 4.0
11. An ASOG requires the following
Contingency plans and recovery measures Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
five elements:
i. CAM and TAM Positioning standby MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
configuration
Proactive yellows Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
ii. Yellow status
rationalization Legacy blues Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
iii. Suitable modes and
ASOG refresh Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
features
iv. Position reference systems Question Tracking Sheet (QTS) Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
v. Manage the vessel’s worst-
Vessel Overview Document Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
case failure capability
Back to work (Return to work authorization / As required / stipulated by Company
Reinstatement of failed / serviced equipment)
Escape routes MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
Manning MTS DP Ops Pt2 Sec 4.14
Cross Connections TECHOP_ODP_11_(D)_(CROSS CONNECTIONS)
External Interfaces and influences TECHOP
Appendx B - 2 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP
Competence 1 - Deliverables and Decision Support Tools


Self- Theory /
Competence Actions
Assessment
CAM CAM - The configuration of the DP CAM & CAMO (Legacy SMO) TECHOP_ODP_12_(O) (Defining Critical Activities Requiring
systems required to conduct Selection of Critical Activity Mode)
operating in Critical Activity Mode. CAM is default for any operation
This is the configuration that Activities requiring CAM
provides the highest level of station
keeping integrity. Post failure capability and criteria to establish
same. (Example Based on WCF)
Default open busties
Requirements for Closed Bus CAM in MODUs
TAM TAM – Task Appropriate Mode is a TAM TECHOP_ODP_12_(O) (Defining Critical Activities Requiring
risk based DP system configuration Selection of Critical Activity Mode)
that provides acceptable levels of Post failure capability based on one generator
station keeping integrity appropriate and/or one thruster
to the risk of a loss of position. TAM Risk based mode – Consequences of LOP
may offer other advantages such as
higher post failure DP capability. Risk Assessment – HEMP used to justify TAM
Criteria Trigger points for change of DP Weather MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
system status including thrust and
power levels, the existence of Sea state & tidal current
abnormality or following loss of Equipment failures
redundancy or equipment in defined
DP related subsystems Anomalous behavior
Power and thrust levels
Configuration The configuration of the DP system Valves in marine auxiliary systems MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
including marine auxiliary systems
and power distribution. The setup of Circuit breakers & tie lines
the DP control systems. The Diodes and DC to DC convertors
condition of PRS and vessel
sensors and associated targets Modes and features
types etc. DP control system settings
TAGOS Thruster and Generator Operating Transferable thrusters and generators MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
Strategy – For vessel with complex
or highly configurable power Thrust allocation
distributions systems – Thrust against power curves
recommended combination of
thrusters and generators to achieve Thruster types
redundancy Rudders in DP
TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 Appendx B - 3

TECHOP
Competence 2 - Barrier Philosophy – Defense in Depth

Competence Scale Competence Scale
Themes Description Keywords Reference Self- Self- Theory /
Actions
Assessment Assessment Principles
Barrier Philosophy ‘Barriers’ is the term used to Principles of CAM and TAM and operating TECHOP 12
describe the means by which the within post failure capability.
risk of loss of position or another
Hard and soft barriers Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
defined hazard occurring is
reduced. Barriers may be HEMP Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
physical or procedural.
Bow tie analysis Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Swiss cheese model Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Redundancy MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 1.5
Predictability MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 12.9.4
Seven pillars MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3
Performance, Protection and Detection MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.16
Use of IJS and independent positioning DP Training course / As per Company requirements
display
Barriers to prevent IRM on DP equipment As per Company requirements
Provisions for positioning standby MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
Defense against errors in user configurable TECHOP_ODP_D_14_PRS and DPCS handling of PRS
settings
Well control – Barriers used in drilling Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Simulator training Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Defense in Depth Defense in depth is an aspect of Principles of defense in depth Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
barrier philosophy related to the
process of assuring the Defense in Depth - Demonstrating barrier Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
suitability and integrity of the integrity is being maintained
barriers deployed to mitigate the
risks in any DP operation

TECHOP
Competence 3 - DP Concepts
Themes Description Keywords Reference From

Theory /
Self-Assessment Competence Actions
Principles
Assessment
Basis of The basis of confidence is all the By Design – Seven Pillars MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3
Confidence activities that are undertaken to
By Operations - Validation and verification MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 22
ensure predictable outcomes
leading to delivery of incident free efforts
DP operations Operating within post failure DP capability MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 4.5
Demonstrating attributes of performance, MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.16
protection and detection
Positioning Standby Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Effects of inspection repair and maintenance MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 22
in determining post failure capability
Training of crew in vessel specific equipment PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DP PERSONNEL
TOOL
Industrial mission MTS DP Ops guidance
Contingency plans – Point of initiation & no- MTS DP Ops guidance & Coaching and mentoring (Future
return TECHOP - in development)
DP Redundancy Redundancy is the ability of a Fault tolerance MTS Design Guidance & Seven pillars
system to remain in operation
Redundancy MTS Design Guidance & Seven pillars
following a failure. DP
redundancy is the ability of a DP Reliability MTS Design Guidance & Seven pillars
system to maintain position and
heading following the worst-case 7 - Pillars - Resilience MTS Design Guidance & Seven pillars
failure. Active redundancy uses Predictability MTS Design Guidance & Seven pillars
the idle capacity is surviving
equipment to continue positioning Fail Safe MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.3
when the failure has occurred. Performance MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.16
Fault tolerance depends upon
each redundant group having the Protection MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.16
required performance to maintain
Detection MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 3.16
position on its own, the necessary
protection system to reject Cross connections TECHOP_ODP_11_(D) (Cross Connections)
erroneous data, make system fail
safe and to isolate faults that External influences TECHOP
might propagate between External interface TECHOP
redundant groups causing more
severe failure effects.
Seven Pillars The seven pillars are desirable Provided by: Compromised by:
attributes in the design of a DP Autonomy Centralized control
system – Together they systems
contribute to predictable
outcomes and deliver incident Segregation Cross connections
free DP operations. Predictability between main
is: machinery
Independence Cross connections
between redundant
groups
Differentiation Common equipment
types and measurement
principles
Fault tolerance Single point failures
Fault resistance Poor choice of
components

TECHOP
Competence 3 - DP Concepts

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
Fault ride through Poor design
Post failure Post failure DP capability defines Capability plot MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 4
Capability a vessel’s ability to maintain
Drift off, drive off, force off Company Riser analysis document
position and heading following the
worst-case failure. Post failure Watch circles – Yellow and Red MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 4.8
capability may be documented by
a series of capability plots
showing the maximum wind
envelope for a range of sea
currents. The worst-case failure
may be heading dependent. The
worst-case failure may change
depending on the failure criteria.
Basic principles of Dynamic Positioning is a method Six - degrees of freedom Company DP SAFE course Module 2
Dynamic for maintaining the position of a
Surge Sway & Yaw MTS DP Ops Pt2 Appendix 1 Section 3.13
Positioning vessel with respect to a point on
the sea bed by means of vectored Position references MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 15
thrust.
Vessel sensors MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 15
Power system MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 9, 10
Thrust allocation & barred zones MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 14.7
Thruster, azimuthing, tunnel, main propellers, MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 7
rudders
Power available for thrust & Spinning Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Reserve
Mathematical model MTS DP Design Pt2 Section 14
Sideways speed tests Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)

TECHOP
Competence 4 – DP Guidance

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
Company Company standards which specify Design engineering manual As per Company / Client requirements for specified activities
Standards the types of equipment, decision
support tools and minimum General requirements
performance levels required to Philosophy
conduct DP operations safely on
board a dynamically positioning Applicable Industry guidelines
vessel. Big rules
These may be based on Industry
guidance and standards from Technical and Operations Management
bodies like IMCA / MTS / OCIMF. Verification process
Newbuild vessels
Manning
FMEAs and Trials
Fires in Machinery Spaces
ESD, F&G
PRS
Tools Simulations, analysis, special modes
and features
Modes and Busties configurations
Data logging and alarms
DP Status
Documentation
Operational guidelines
DP SIMOPS
Pre-Field arrival checks
Reporting
Simulator Training
PRS
OCIMF DP The oil companies’ international DP Assurance Category Identification (ACID) Sec 3.5
Assurance marine forum published a ‘risk-
Framework based’ dynamic positioning Qualifications, experience and competency Sec 2
assurance framework. This Shore-based DP personnel Sec 2.1
framework sets out sound DP
assurance practices and minimum DP vessel-based personnel Sec 2.2
requirements for DP subject Vessel handling skills Sec 2.3
matter experts
DP assurance framework aims Sec 3.5
Loss of position and consequences Sec 3.2
Risk-based approach Sec 3.3
DP assurance management and records Sec 3.4
Use of manual mode to manage external Sec 4.2
forces
Modes on a DP vessel Sec 4.1

TECHOP

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
IMO MSC 645 (113 This is the high-level document DP Equipment Class Section 2
IMO) which defines IMO guidance for
Failure criteria Section 2.2
vessels and units with dynamic
positioning systems. Physical separation A60 & WT Section 2.2.3
Active components Section 2.2.2.1
Passive components Section 2.2.2.2
Power system configuration (Busties) Section 3.2
Fail safe condition of thrusters Section 3.3
Consequence analysis Section 3.4.3.4
Ergonomics Section 3.4.1
Inadvertent acts (maloperation) Section 2.3
Backup DP control system Section 3.4.2.6
PRS operational requirements Section 3.4.3.1
Number and diversity in PRS Section 3.4.3.3
Vessel sensors Section 3.4.4
Cable and pipe routes Section 3.5
Non-DP related systems Section 3.6
Initial, annual & periodic surveys Section 5.1
FSVAD DPVAD Section 5.2
DNVGL RP E307 This is the DNV GL version of the Activity operational planning DNV GL RP E307, ‘DP Operations Guidance’ – All Parts
MTS DP Vessel Operations
ASOG, WSOG
guidance
Competence & manning
Capability plots and foot prints
Logistics vessels
Project and construction vessels
MODUs
DP Incidents

TECHOP

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
DNVGL RP E306 This is the DNV GL version of the Time to terminate DNV GL E306 ‘DP Vessel Design Philosophy Guidelines’ – All
MTS DP Design Philosophy Parts
Redundancy concept
guidelines
Post WCF DP capability
Critical and non-critical redundancy
Low Loss Redundancy Concept (LLRC) also
known as Low Impact Failure Effects (LIFE)
Defending the redundancy concept
Key elements of redundancy concept
Autonomy and decentralization
Diversity and differentiation
Modeling
Management of change
Propulsion
Marine auxiliary systems
Power generation & Power station concept
Power distribution
Power and vessel management
Blackout recovery
Networks and serial lines
Uninterruptable power supplies
DP control systems
Sensors
External Interfaces
Safety systems
Ergonomics
Alarm management
Communications
Inspection repair and maintenance
Commissioning and testing
FMEA specification
PROFESSIONAL Mapping Delivery Ability Tool – A Design, Operations, Process and People DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE
DEVELOPMENT self-assessment process develop October 15-16, 2013, ‘Leveraging MTS PROFESSIONAL
Enabling
OF DP for use by the DP community DEVELOPMENT OF DP PERSONNEL TOOL for the
PERSONNEL Leveraging Development of Marine Risk Staff Professionals’
TOOL
Behaviors
MTS ‘Guidance for Professional Development of Personnel
Recognizing challenges
Engaged in DP Operations Using the Mapping Delivery Ability
Critical success factors Tool (PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DP
PERSONNEL TOOL)’ – All parts
Roll out and implementation methodology

TECHOP

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
RP D102 DNVGL’s Recommended Practice FMEA of Systems with redundancy DNV ‘Recommended Practice for FMEA of Redundant
for FMEA of Redundant Systems systems’, RP D102 – all Parts
Redundancy verification table
– This is the minimum
requirement for DP systems Redundancy design intent
FMEAs referenced in the
Company standards Single failure propagation analysis
Unit and subsystem FMEA
FMEA table
Redundant systems with physical separation
Inspection and tests
FMEA report and compliance statement
Failure modes in systems with closed busties
IMCA M166 Guidance on FMEAs FMEA methodology IMCA M166 ‘Guidance on FMEAs’
IMCA M117 Training and experience of key Competence IMCA M117 Training and Experience of key DP Personnel
DP Personnel
IMCA M190 Guidance for developing and Development of Annual DP trials programs IMCA M190 ‘Guidance for developing and conducting annual
conducting annual DP trials DP trials programs for DP vessels’ – All Parts.
Difference between annual and proving trials
programs for DP vessels
Competence of persons developing the trials
programs
Lifetime management of trials
Conduct of trials
Independent witness
Findings
IMCA M191 (Now Guidelines for annual DP trials for Continuous trials for MODUs IMCA M191 – ‘Guidelines for annual DP trials for DP mobile
incorporated into DP mobile offshore drilling units offshore drilling units’ – all Parts (Now incorporated into M190)
M190) Objectives
Annual verification
IMCA M220 Guidance on operational activity CAMO IMCA M220 – ‘Guidance on Operational Activity Planning’ –
planning All Parts
TAM
ASOG
Operational activity planning
IMCA M225 Example redundancy concept and Linking redundancy concept to trials IMCA M225 ‘Example Redundancy Concept and Annual DP
annual DP trials for a DP class 3 Trials for a DP Class 3 Construction vessel’ – All Parts
construction vessel Performance
Protection
Detection
Use of planned maintenance
IMCA M182 International guidelines for the Crew competence IMCA M182 - International guidelines for the safe operation of
safe operation of dynamically dynamically positioned offshore supply vessels – All Parts
positioned offshore supply Supply vessel manning
vessels Rolling trials for PSVs

TECHOP

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
Incident TECHOP_Gen_03 Fish Bone Structure TECHOP_Gen_03

Investigation (Conducting Effective and Conducting Effective and Comprehensive
Short, Medium & Long Term Actions
Comprehensive DP Incident DP Incident Investigations)
Investigations) Causal and contributory factors
Data gathering
Learning from Incidents (LFIs)
TECHOPs TECHOP_ODP_13_(D) (Control Cross connections in control power supplies TECHOP_ODP_13_(D) (Control Power Supplies and Auto
Power Supplies and Auto Changeovers) – All Parts
Failure modes of diodes
Changeovers)
DC to DC convertors
Grounding strategies
Cross connections created by ground faults
Dual supplies – Mitigating failure effects
Auto-changeovers
TECHOP_ODP_09_(D) (A Case for action TECHOP_ODP_09_(D) (A Method for Proving the Fault Ride-
Method for Proving the Fault Through Capability Of DP Vessels With HV Power Plant) – All
Ride-Through Capability Of DP Requirements Parts
Vessels With HV Power Plant) Attributes to be verified
Expertise
Practical considerations
Model validation
Alternative forms of testing
TECHOP_ODP_08_(O) (Annual Review of DP systems FMEA TECHOP_ODP_08_(O) (Annual DP Trials and Gap Analysis)-
DP Trials and Gap Analysis) All Parts
Proving the integrity of the redundancy
concept
Fail safe condition of thrusters
Control mode tests
Performance tests
Testing protective functions
Testing switched or standby redundancy
Testing physical separation
Testing control modes
Group redundancy tests
Findings
Annual DP Trials Gap Analysis
TECHOP_ODP_02_(D)_ Design objectives TECHOP_ODP_02_(D)_ (Blackout Recovery) - All Parts
(Blackout Recovery)
Desirable and undesirable features
Testing blackout recovery
Specification for blackout recovery systems

TECHOP

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
TECHOPs TECHOP_Gen_02_ (White Paper Maintaining MODU redundancy concept by TECHOP_Gen_02_ (White Paper on Continuous Trials for DP
on Continuous Trials for DP continuous trials MODUs)
Modus)
Developing continuous trials
Performance, Protection & Detection
Crew training opportunity
Planned maintenance
Tests of opportunity
Charterers batch trials
TECHOP_ODP_11_(D) (Cross Cross connections for reliability and TECHOP_ODP_11_(D) (Cross Connections) - All Parts.
Connections) maintenance
Fault propagation paths
Closed busties
Auto-changeovers
Dual AC supplies
Load sharing lines
Switchboard control power and
synchronizing lines
Marine auxiliary services
Networks
Influence of CAM in TAM
Identifying cross connections
TECHOP_ODP_12_(O) (Defining Concepts of CAM & TAM TECHOP_ODP_12_(O) (Defining Critical Activities Requiring
Critical Activities Requiring Selection of Critical Activity Mode)- All parts
Drivers for operating in TAM
Selection of Critical Activity Mode)
Default is CAM
Examples of critical and non-critical activities
TECHOP_ODP_06_(D) (DGNSS Impacts of design, operations and people TECHOP_ODP_06_(D) (DGNSS Position Reference
Position Reference Sensors) Sensors)- All Parts.
Antenna location
Weatherization
Lightening protection
Interfacing
Principles
Corrections
Inertial navigation systems
Over reliance on DGNSS

TECHOP

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
TECHOPs TECHOP_ODP_05_(O) (DP Expected content for DP operations manuals TECHOP_ODP_05_(O) (DP Operations Manual)- All Parts
Operations Manual)
The importance of the redundancy concept
The configurations that are required to
support the redundancy concept
The role of defined individuals in maintaining
/ defending the redundancy concept
A clear understanding of post failure
capability
Content and use of ASOG / WSOG
TECHOP_ODP_03_(D)_ Classification of protective functions - what TECHOP_ODP_03_(D)_(Evaluation Of Protection Systems)-
(Evaluation of Protection purpose do they serve All Parts
Systems)
Good practice in the design of control,
monitoring and protective functions.
The disadvantage of combining protection
and control
External Interfaces – ESD F&G DP Incidents caused by external interfaces Covered in main MTS design philosophy document
safety shutdown systems, VMS
interface such as draught sensors Identifying, analyzing and improving external
etc. and other IM interfaces interfaces
F&G and ESD systems
External force compensation
Draught sensors
Power control for industrial consumers
Power distribution for industrial and hotel
loads
Firefighting systems
Communication and navigation equipment
Roll stabilization
TECHOP_ODP_04_(D)_(FMEA Why perform a DP FMEA gap analysis? TECHOP_ODP_04_(D)_(FMEA Gap Analysis) - All Parts
Gap Analysis)
Purpose of gap analysis
Meaning of color codes
First stage gap analysis
Second stage gap analysis
TECHOP_ODP_01_(D)_(FMEA The need for testing TECHOP_ODP_01_(D)_(FMEA Testing) - All Parts
Testing)
What, when, where and why to test
How to test
Acceptance criteria and scope
Unacceptable test results
Gap Analysis of DP FMEA proving trials

TECHOP

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
TECHOPs Technical and Operational TECHOP ODP Technical and Operational Guidance (TECHOP) – All Parts
Guidance (TECHOP)
TECHOP Gen
TECHOP_ODP_00_(O)_(High Identifying DP as a Safety Critical Element TECHOP_ODP_00_(O)_(High Level Philosophy)
Level Philosophy)
Additional information to be incorporated in
Operations Manual
Establishing a Vessel Specific Drive off to
Drift off strategy
Reinstatement of equipment post failure
Drive off to drift of strategy
TECHOP_Gen_01_(Power Plant Common cause failures TECHOP_Gen_01_(Power Plant Common Cause Failures) –
Common Cause Failures) All Parts
Common control power supplies
Common backup supplies
Lack of excitation support
Severe voltage dips
Selectivity
Default to factory settings
Effects of regeneration
Load acceptance and rejection
Poor power factors
Environmental conditions
Contamination of fuel and combustion air
Fouling of cooling water systems
Common software errors
Common sensor principles
Inappropriate combinations of sensor
principles
Harmonic distortion and inrush transients
Fuel and excitation control failures
Broken conductors and single phasing
Overload
Effects of fire and flooding
HIL Testing TECHOP The need for software testing In development
Hardware in the loop testing (HIL)
Software in the loop testing (SIL)
Endurance testing
Independent and dependent HIL

TECHOP

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
TECHOPs TECHOP_ODP_14_(D) Golden rules for all PRS TECHOP_ODP_14_(D)_(PRS and DPCS Handling of PRS)-
(PRS and DPCS Handling of All Parts
Functional objectives of PRS and DPCS
PRS) handling of PRS
Choices of PRS and Modes to suit industrial
mission

TECHOP
Competence 5 – Verification & Validation

Competence Assessment Evidence

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
Classification Classification society rules International Association of Classification Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
society rules represent the minimum standard Societies
to which DP vessels should be
constructed. Vessel owners may Classification societies and recognized Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
specify a higher standard based organizations
on industry guidance. Class notations Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Type approval Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Inspection and sea trials Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Plan approval Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
Annual DP Trials Annual survey of all-important Proving the system operates as intended 113 IMO
equipment associated with the DP
system is performed within a Proving the DP system is intact and well 113 IMO
three-month window either side of maintained
the anniversary date of the DP The effects of single failures 113 IMO
FMEA proving trials. The trials
report should demonstrate that the Rolling and continuous trials IMCA M190 & M191 (Now incorporated into M190)
DP system is in good order and it Role of Independent witness IMCA 190
responds correctly to single
failures. Findings - Categories IMCA 190
Use of planned maintenance IMCA M225
FMEA Proving The DP FMEA proving trials are Proving the conclusions of the DP system DNV RP D102
Trials intended to confirm the findings of FMEA
the DP system FMEA and are one
Proving system complies with rules and 113 IMO
of the document submissions
guidelines
which, together with the FMEA,
contributes to the approval New knowledge and lessons learned TECHOP_ODP_01_(D)_(FMEA Testing)
process for the appropriate DP
notation. Opportunity for improvements TECHOP_ODP_01_(D)_(FMEA Testing)
Exploratory testing TECHOP_ODP_01_(D)_(FMEA Testing)
Categories for concerns or findings TECHOP_ODP_01_(D)_(FMEA Testing) DNVGL RP E306
Post event trials These trials or related activities Back to work criteria As per Company / Client requirements
are performed in order to establish
Reinstatement of equipment
the basis of confidence that the
DP vessel has the expected Stress test
station keeping integrity following
an incident Soak tests
Vendor support
Project specific Training carried out to allow crews Simulator Training As per Company / Client requirements
simulator to practice unusual operations.
requirements Particularly useful with SIMOPs
when crews of several vessels
may practice together
Effective onboard A primary function of DP SMEs to Engagements Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
engagements ensure communication of
requirements

TECHOP
Competence 6 – In Execution Support


Self- Theory /
Competence Actions
Assessment
Marine Operations Provide in-execution support when Response to yellows and reds As per Company / Client requirements
requested. Engage with other
Specifying analytical / engineering work Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
subject matter experts, vessel
crew, project teams and owner’s relevant to impacts on station keeping
organization in order to resolve Return to work authorization As per Company / Client requirements
issues and progress the execution
of marine operations and the Responding to and resolving dilemmas Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
industrial mission. Follow the sun support Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
– In service support
Incident Perform incident investigations. TECHOP_GEN_03 TECHOP_GEN_03
investigations Conducting Effective and Comprehensive Conducting Effective and Comprehensive
DP Incident Investigations DP Incident Investigations – all Parts
Organize specific vendor support, analysis
and testing
Creating LFIs

TECHOP
Competence 7 – Impacts of Industrial Mission on Station Keeping

Competence level Evidence

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
Modes and DP control system require certain Relative and absolute PRS MTS DP Design Section 14.7
features special modes and features to
Heavy lift mode
perform some type of industrial
mission. External force compensation
Suspended loads
Three axis and two axis control
Pipelay mode
Follow target
Weather vane
Fire monitor compensation
Draught sensors
Environmental The nature of the work to be carried Drift off, Drift on scenarios MTS DP Design Section 15.4, MTS DP Design Section 2.6.4
forces at work out may require working in a less
Solitons
location favorable location with respect to
weather and the risk of contact with Tropical storms
surface assets and other vessels in
the case of blackout or insufficient Lightning strikes
thrust. Extreme environmental
weather phenomena may also
require consideration.
Heavy lifting Heavy lifting operations include the Side forces – Destabilization of DP DP Design Pt 2 Section 3.25, 14.7, 2.4
operations transfer of topsides to jackets. The
lifting of modules on to production Suspended loads
MTS DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE – Nils Albert
platforms. Takes account of the Deselecting DP at touch down Jensen
effects of the load transfer on the
mass of the vessel and the Wind profile and model October 7 - 8, 2008
additional lateral force, normally by Operations
reducing gain and relaxing the DP ‘On the Use of Safety Moorings in DP Operations’
controller.
Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)

Riser pull-in or This is typical of operations in which External Forces As per Company / Client requirements
handover a DP vessel will transfer a load to Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
another DP vessel or surface
assets.
Subsea Working / diving within anchor patterns Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development)
obstructions
External force Where the measured external force Design of inputs to DP - Manual input MTS DP Design Pt2 Sec 14.20,
compensation acting on the vessel, which is TECHOP_ODP_10_(D)_(EXTERNAL INTERFACES)
separate from the environment, is Need for systems engineering approach in
design of interface. Fault tolerance in
included in the DP calculation and
interface and redundancy
treated as a force feed forward.
This mode is used to account for
pipe tensions in a pipe layer and
hawser tension in a shuttle tanker.

TECHOP
Competence 7 – Impacts of Industrial Mission on Station Keeping

Competence level Evidence

Theory /
Principles
Assessment
Hold back vessels The practice of using a tug or other Interaction leading to instability MTS DP Conference, 2008. ‘On the use of Safety Moorings in
DP vessel as a safety mooring to DP Operations’
reduce the risk of a loss of position.
This practice is potentially
hazardous and may have
unintended consequences.
SIMOPS Operations involving several SIMOPS tools As per Company / Client requirements
vessels. MTS DP Conference 2005 Operations II
Case Study of DP Vessels Performing SIMOPS
Xiaobing Shi
Diego Martinez
Doug Phillips
PRS Hazards interference, shadowing, loss of line View of the sky TECHOP_ODP_14_(D)
of sight and other hazards (PRS and DPCS Handling of PRS)
Thermoclines
associated with the industrial
mission. For example, the view of Noise in the water column
the sky from DGNSS antennas may
be obscured by decks of surface Swinging loads through line of sight
assets or by project equipment. Ex rated equipment
Relative PRS and Absolute PRS provide a position Follow target modes TECHOP_ODP_14_(D)
target vessel references with respect to a fixed (PRS and DPCS Handling of PRS)
Analysis of target vessel motions
motions point on the earth surface. Relative
PRS provide a reference from a Redundant relative PRS Competence 9
non-earth refenced object which
may be moving object (typically
range and bearing). If the object to
which the reference moves too
much it may not be possible to use
that reference in Auto Position.
Gangways Gangways re used to allow transfer Walk to work Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in development),
of personnel and equipment from As per Company / Client requirements
one DP vessel to a surface asset Instrumented gangways as PRS
such as a production platform or Active – Heave compensated - gangways
FPSO.
Risk of loss of position to gangway vessel
and to surface asset

TECHOP
Competence 8 – Impacts of Station Keeping on Industrial Mission

Themes Description Keywords Reference Self-Assessment From

Theory /
Competence Actions
Principles
Assessment
Consequences of Before commissioning a DP vessel Barriers required TECHOP_ODP_12_(O) (Defining Critical Activities Requiring
loss of position to carry out a particular industrial Selection of Critical Activity Mode)
CAM & TAM
mission it is necessary to evaluate
the consequences. If the
consequences of loss of position
are unacceptably high. It may be
necessary to create additional
barriers or find an alternative way of
performing the work.
Range and water Position reference systems have Limitations TECHOP_ODP_14_(D)
depth restriction range restrictions including distance (PRS and DPCS Handling of PRS)
to target and water depth
restrictions.
Diving Single stern thruster design not to Poor transient response following WCF As per Company / Client requirements
be used for diving.
Decision points When certain go-no-go points are Time to terminate As per Company / Client requirements
reached.
Time for which positioning standby can be As per Company / Client requirements
applied / is effective
Modes and Requirements & need for ‘Systems PRS As per Company / Client requirements
Features Engineering Approach’. TECHOP 14 PRS & DPCS handling of PRS
Industrial Mission
DP Capability DP vessels have a static and a Stat cap MTS DP Design Section 4
dynamic positioning capability. Both
may need to be considered for Dyn cap
some types of industrial mission. Foot prints and position excursion
DP vessel can be equipped with
different types and combinations of Thruster wash
propulsion including tunnel Barred Zones
thrusters, azimuthing thrusters,
main propellers and rudders. Not all Thruster arrangements
arrangements are suitable for all
types of industrial mission.

TECHOP
Competence 9 – Defining Identifying & Managing Interfaces Relevant to Station Keeping
From Competence Evidence

Themes Description Keywords Self-Assessment
Assessment Theory / Principles Actions
DP SME role DP SME role in managing business Business / project objectives Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in
risks Stakeholder management development)
Interface management
Balancing risks Determining when to allow Enterprise risk Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in
operations to continue in Yellow Process safety risk development)
status. Deciding which side of bow-
Bow ties
tie to address risk.
Developing and Barriers and compensating Barrier philosophy Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in
creating barriers measures initiated when operations development)
and compensating continue in yellow status
measures
Strategies – Strategies and approaches to Business / venture risk Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in
Business risk V manage overarching business / Commercial risks development)
DP station venture risks in conjunction with
Reputation risk
keeping risk managing station keeping risk
Interface There are many stakeholders who Stakeholders Coaching and mentoring (Future TECHOP - in
management may be impacted or who may have development)
an impact over DP operations. The
DP SME may be required to
establish dialog with these
stakeholders.

TECHOP - ODP - 16 - (P) - Part - 2 - (DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS) - INTERIM - Ver1 - 03201921 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHOP - ODP - 16 - (P) - Part - 2 - (DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS) - INTERIM - Ver1 - 03201921 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHOP - ODP - 16 - (P) - Part - 2 - (DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS) - INTERIM - Ver1 - 03201921 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL GUIDANCE

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 1

DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

2 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 3

4 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 5

1 DP SME COMPETENCE OVERVIEW

1.2 PROFICIENCY SCALE

1.3 DISTRIBUTION OF PROFICIENCY LEVELS

1.4 PROOF POINTS

6 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

Table 1 Detailed Proof Points

What can be expected from a DP SME at each skill level:

Level Proof Points

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 7

2.2 ELEMENTS OF COMPETENCE

2.3 ASSESSMENT OF COMPETENCE

8 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

3.2 COMP 2. BARRIER PHILOSOPHY – DEFENSE IN DEPTH

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 9

3.2.3 Define / Specify

3.3 COMP 3. DP CONCEPTS

10 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

3.4 COMP 4. DP GUIDANCE

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 11

3.4.3 Define / Specify

3.5 COMP 5. VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

12 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

3.6 COMP 6. IN EXECUTION SUPPORT

3.7 COMP 7. IMPACTS OF INDUSTRIAL MISSION ON STATION KEEPING

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 13

3.7.3 Define / Specify

3.8 COMP 8. IMPACTS OF STATION KEEPING ON INDUSTRIAL MISSION

3.9 COMP 9. INTERFACE MANAGEMENT

14 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

3.9.3 Define / Specify

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 15

Consultant community MTS members to cascade/ promulgate.

16 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 Appendices

APPENDIX A EXAMPLE ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Appendix A TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

A.1 Example Assessment Interview

Overall Result (Tick One)

Competence gaps identified ☐ Competent ☐

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 Appendx A - 1

A.3 Suggested Assessor Instructions

A.4 Opening the Exercise

Appendx A - 2 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921 Appendx A - 3

A.9 Question, Response and Scoring

Guide to assigning skill levels on the basis of answers:

SKILLED - A candidate who is skilled in the subject competence is likely to demonstrate a

KNOWLEDGEABLE – A candidate who is knowledgeable in a particular competence may

Appendx A - 4 TECHOP_ODP_16_(P)_Part_2_(DP SME PRACTITIONER COMPETENCY ELEMENTS)_INTERIM_Ver1_03201921

APPENDIX B PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF DP SMES