M8a PDF

Capital Markets
& Financial Advisory

Services examination
Module 8A Collective Investment Schemes II
First Edition
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Photocopying or reproducing this Study Text partly or entirely will tantamount to an
infringement of our copyright of this publication. We will take action to protect our
copyright.
WARNING To All Examination Candidates

Identification Documents For Examination Entry
(i) If you DO NOT bring along an acceptable form of identification, you will STRICTLY
NOT BE ALLOWED to sit for the examination that you have registered.
(ii) The identification document that you bring along to the examination room MUST
match exactly the same identification document that you have used to register for
the examination.
(iii) There will be NO REFUND of Examination Fees paid.
Acceptable form of identification (IN ORIGINAL) is only ANY ONE of the following
documents, bearing in mind of item (ii) above:
(a) For a Singaporean or Singapore Permanent Resident, the identification document
must either be:
(i) a Valid Singapore Identity Card; OR
(ii) a Valid Singapore Passport; OR
(iii) a Singapore Driving Licence.
(b) For a Foreigner, the identification document must either be:

(i) a Valid Passport; OR
(ii) a Valid Employment Pass (EP) with Photo (including an S-Pass); OR
(iii) a Valid Work Permit issued by the Ministry of Manpower, Singapore.
All other forms of identification [such as Agent Card, Staff Card, SAF Card (11B), and
the like] are NOT ACCEPTABLE.
Soft copies of identification are also strictly NOT ACCEPTABLE.
Any candidate who does not comply will be turned away from the examination room
by the invigilator, and will need to re-register for the examination and pay all the
related fees again.
Please note that no exception shall be made.

COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT
SCHEMES II
1st Edition - October 2011
© 2011 by Singapore College of Insurance Limited. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, adapted, included as part of a compilation (electronic or otherwise), stored in
a retrieval system, included in a cable programme, broadcast or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Singapore College of Insurance Limited
(SCI). We solely reserve our rights to protect our copyright.
This study guide is designed as a learning programme. SCI is not engaged in rendering legal, tax, investment or other
professional advice and the reader should consult professional counsel as appropriate. We have tried to provide you with the
most accurate and useful information possible. However, the information in this publication may be affected by changes in
law or industry practice, and, as a result, information contained in this publication may become outdated. This material
should in no way be used as an original source of authority on legal matters. Any names used in this textbook are fictional
and have no relationship to any persons living or dead.
1st Edition published in October 2011

Preface
Capital Markets and Financial Advisory Services Examination -
Module 8A – Collective Investment Schemes II
In line with the licensing framework under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA) and
Financial Advisers Act (FAA), the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has launched
a modular examination structure, known as the Capital Markets and Financial Advisory
Services Examination (CMFAS Examination).
This study guide is designed for candidates preparing for Module 8A – Collective
Investment Schemes II examination. This examination is for new and existing
representatives of financial advisers who need to comply with MAS requirement to
possess the requisite knowledge to advise or sell Collective Investment Schemes.
The objectives of the CMFAS Module 8A – Collective Investment Schemes II

examination are to test candidates on their knowledge and understanding of the
features, types, advantages and disadvantages of structured products, comparison
with other investment options, governance structure, documentation and risks
associated with the investment of structured products, particularly structured funds,
elaborating on common examples, as well as to evaluate some examples of structured
funds on product features, inherent risks, and performance under various market
conditions in determining product suitability for the clients. It also discusses the various
types of derivatives in the market, both on-the-exchange and over-the-counter.
Organisation of Study guide

This study guide is divided into 6 chapters, each devoted to a specific topic that the
candidates will need to know, in order to pass the CMFAS Module 8A examination, as
outlined below.
Chapter 1: Provides an introduction to structured products in general, such as the
components and types of structured products, and their suitability to
meet clients’ investment needs. Similarities and differences of
structured products are also covered as a whole.
Chapter 2: Provides an overview on some of the risk considerations of structured
products, such as market risk, issuer or credit risk, liquidity risk, foreign
exchange risk, structural risk and other risks.
Chapter 3: Discusses the various types of derivatives in the market, both on-the-
exchange and over-the-counter, such as futures, forwards, options,
warrants, swaps and contract for differences (CFD).
Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10] i
Chapter 4: Provides an introduction to structured funds, such as the basic types of
structured funds in the market, considerations when investing in such
funds, their governance structure, documentation and risk for structured
funds. Determination of a fund’s market value is also discussed.
Chapter 5: Elaborates on common examples of structured funds, such as
structured ETFs, hedge funds, fund of funds and formula funds.
Chapter 6: Uses two examples of structured funds to illustrate the issues to keep
in mind when investing in structured funds. The analysis includes a
review of the structure and investment objective of the fund,
interpretation of some of the terms used in the fund’s documents, fund
/ return performance and the risk factors of the respective structured
fund.
While every effort has been made to ensure that the study guide materials are accurate
and up-to-date at the time of publishing, some information may become outdated
before the latest version is released. Hence candidates are advised to check the
“Version Control Record” found at the end of this study guide to ensure that they have
the correct version of the study guide. For examination purposes, the Singapore
College of Insurance adopts the policy of testing only those concepts and topics that
are found in the latest version of the study guide.
ii Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10]
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our appreciation and gratitude to Mr Glen Lee and Mr Andrew
Ng, representatives from the Investment Management Association of Singapore for
reviewing this study guide, as well as the Monetary Authority of Singapore for their
insightful comments.
Karine Kam
Executive Director
Singapore College of Insurance
October 2011
Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10] iii
Study Guide Features
Several study aids have been included to help candidates master and apply the study
guide information. These include:
Chapter Outline and Key Learning Points

An outline of the chapter is provided on the first page of each chapter, after which the
key learning points are listed to help candidates gain an overview of the chapter’s
contents and the expected learning outcomes to be achieved.
Revisions And Updates

To enable candidates to check that they have the latest version of the study guide, the
“Version Control Record” at the end of this study guide will list the relevant revisions
and updates that have been made, as well as the date when the changes will apply to
the examinations.
NB: Throughout this study guide, where applicable, the masculine gender has been
used to represent both genders, in order to avoid the tedium of the continual use
of “he or she”, “his or her” or “himself or herself”.
iv Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10]
PREFACE ................................................................................................... i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................ iii
STUDY GUIDE FEATURES ........................................................................... iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................ v
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURED PRODUCTS ............................. 1

1. What Is A Structured Product?
1.1 How Does A Structured Product Work?
1.2 What Is A Wrapper?
1.3 Why Invest In Structured Products?
1.4 Challenges Facing Structured Products
2. Components Of A Structured Product
2.1 Principal Risk Versus Return Risk
2.2 Trade-off Between Risk And Return
3. Types Of Structured Products
3.1 Products Designed To Protect Capital
3.2 Yield Enhancement Products
3.3 Participation Products
4. Similarities And Differences Of Structured Products
4.1 Similarities In Features
4.2 Differences In Features
4.3 Differences In Rights
4.4 Similarities And Differences In Governance
5. Suitability
5.1 Know Your Clients
5.2 Know Your Products
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 2 RISK CONSIDERATIONS OF STRUCTURED PRODUCTS ................ 26
1. Market Risk
2. Issuer Or Swap Counterparty Credit Risk
3. Liquidity Risk
4. Foreign Exchange (FX) Risk
5. Structural Risk
5.1 Safety Of Principal
5.2 Leverage
5.3 Investment In Derivatives
5.4 Investment Concentration
5.5 Collateral
6. Other Risks
6.1 Legal And Regulatory
6.2 Correlation
6.3 Modelling
6.4 Early Redemption
6.5 Examples Of Redemption Amount
Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10] v
CHAPTER 3 UNDERSTANDING DERIVATIVES ............................................... 37
1. What Are Derivatives?
1.1 Practical Example Of Derivative
2. Futures And Forwards
2.1 Pricing Of Forward Contracts
2.2 Practical Examples Of Forward Contracts
2.3 Summary Of Forward Contracts
2.4 History Of Futures Contracts
2.5 Pricing Of Futures Contracts
2.6 Margin (Futures Contracts)
2.7 Market Participants
2.8 Futures Trading Strategies
3. Options And Warrants
3.1 Risk Profile Of Option / Warrant
3.2 Plain Vanilla Versus Exotic Option
3.3 Basic Option Trading Strategies
3.4 Bullish Option Strategies
3.5 Bearish Option Strategies
3.6 Neutral Option Strategies
3.7 Summary Of Options
4. Swaps
4.1 Interest Rate Swaps
4.2 Currency Swaps
4.3 Credit Default Swap (CDS)
4.4 Equity Swaps
4.5 Commodity Swaps
5. Contract For Differences (CFD)
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 4 INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURED FUNDS ................................. 69
1. What Is A Structured Fund?
1.1 Offer Of Structured Funds In Singapore
1.2 Undertakings For Collective Investment In Transferrable Securities(UCITS)
1.3 Common Terminology
2. Common Examples Of Structured Funds
2.1 Index Funds
2.2 Fund Of Funds (FoF)
2.3 Hedge Funds
2.4 Enhanced Index Fund
2.5 Formula Fund
3. What To Consider Before Investing In Structured Funds?
3.1 Advantages Of Investing In A CIS
3.2 Disadvantages Of Investing In A CIS
3.3 Additional Considerations For Structured Funds
4. Governance
4.1 The Typical Structure Of Funds
4.2 Role Of Trustee Or The Board Of Directors
4.3 Fiduciary Obligation Of A Fund Manager
4.4 Investment Guidelines For Retail Funds
vi Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10]
5. Typical Types Of Documentation And Risks
5.1 Risk Considerations
5.2 Pre-sale Documentation
5.3 Post-sale Disclosure
5.4 Redemption Prices
6. Determination Of The Fund’s Market Value
6.1 Quoted Shares
6.2 Debt Securities
6.3 Financial Derivatives
CHAPTER 5 EXAMPLES OF STRUCTURED FUNDS ........................................ 89

1. Structured Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
1.1 What Is An ETF?
1.2 Comparing ETFs With Unlisted Index Funds
1.3 Comparing ETFs With Unit Trusts
1.4 Comparing ETFs With Shares
1.5 Changes In Index Constituents
1.6 Determination Of Fair Value Of An ETF
1.7 Difference Between The Price Of An ETF and Its NAV
1.8 Summary Of Comparison Of ETFs, Shares And Unit Trusts
1.9 What Are Structured ETFs?
1.10 Long, Short And Leveraged ETFs
1.11 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Structured ETFs
1.12 What Types Of Investors Would Invest In Structured ETFs?
1.13 When Are Structured ETFs Unsuitable For Investors?
1.14 Common Examples Of Structured ETFs
1.15 Governance
1.16 ETFs As A Tool For Wealth Management
Table of Contents
1.17 After Sales
2. Hedge Funds
2.1 What Is A Hedge Fund?
2.2 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Hedge Funds
2.3 What Types Of Investors Would Invest In A Hedge Fund?
2.4 When Are Hedge Funds Unsuitable For Investors?
2.5 Common Examples Of Hedge Funds
2.6 Guaranteed Hedge Funds
2.7 Example Of Two Strategies
2.8 Governance
2.9 After Sales
3. Fund Of Funds
3.1 What Is A Fund Of Funds?
3.2 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Fund Of Funds
3.3 What Types Of Investors Would Invest In A Fund Of Funds?
3.4 When Are Funds Of Funds Unsuitable For Investors?
3.5 Common Examples Of Fund of Funds
3.6 After Sales
4. Formula Funds
4.1 What Is A Formula Fund?
4.2 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Formula Funds
4.3 What Types Of Investors Would Invest Formula Funds?
4.4 When Are Formula Funds Unsuitable For Investors?
Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10] vii
CHAPTER 6 CASE STUDIES ...................................................................... 119
1. Case Study 1 - Currency Income Fund
1.1 Structure And Investment Objective
1.2 Fund Information As At 31 May 2010
1.3 Currency Exposure
1.4 Fund Performance
1.5 Risk Factors
2. Case Study 2 - Fund Of Hedge Funds
2.2 Fund Information As At 30 September 2010
2.4 Risk Factors
E-MOCK EXAMINATION
VERSION CONTROL RECORD
Table of Contents
viii Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10]
1. Introduction To Structured Products
Chapter
1 INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURED
PRODUCTS
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. What Is A Structured Product?
2. Components Of A Structured Product
3. Types Of Structured Products
4. Similarities And Differences Of Structured Products
5. Suitability
KEY LEARNING POINTS

After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
describe what structured products are
identify the components of structured products
explain the types of structured products
understand the similarities and differences of structured products
advise clients on the suitability of structured products
NOTE:
Throughout this study guide, the words:
▪ “capital” and “principal”, and
▪ “investment fund” and “collective investment scheme (CIS)”
are used interchangeably.
Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10] 1
Module 8A: Collective Investment Schemes II
1. WHAT IS A STRUCTURED PRODUCT?
Structured products are among the fastest growing investment classes in

global finance. As the sub-prime mortgage crisis has reminded us, structured
products bear multifaceted complex risks.
The name “structured products” comes from the fact that such products are
created by combining traditional investments (usually a fixed income
instrument such as bond or note) with financial derivatives (usually an
option). Such “structuring” allows the resulting products to achieve specific
risk-return profiles to match the investors’ needs and expectations that
cannot be met by traditional investments.
Structured products are unsecured debt securities of the issuer 1 . They are
commonly backed only by the issuer’s promise to make good on the intended
payouts. They are not equity securities, and holders of structured products
are not entitled to share the issuer’s profits. The fact that the intended
payouts from structured products may be based on equity price movements
does not make them equity securities. Structured products are also referred
to as hybrid products, because it is possible to mirror equity-like (or other
asset classes) returns using a fixed income structure.
Investors need sufficient knowledge to evaluate structured products in the

light of the more complex nature of such products.
1.1 How Does A Structured Product Work?
A bond provides regular interest payments and repayment of the par

value of the bond at maturity. Aside from the bond-issuer’s credit risk,
the bond-holder has certainty of the return from his bond investment.
On the other hand, investment in stock has a higher return potential
compared to bonds, but share prices are volatile and dividends are not
guaranteed. It is desirable from the investors’ perspective if a product
can combine the characteristics of bonds and equities, to offer the
potential upside performance of stocks with the downside protection of
bonds.
Where there is demand, there is supply. An equity-linked note designed

to return at least the principal 2 is the response to the demand, by
combining a zero-coupon bond with an option on an underlying equity
asset. The underlying can be a single stock, or a basket of stocks, or
an index, depending on the investment objective.
1
Examples of exception to this are structured funds, which are discussed in greater detail in later
chapters.
2
The use of the term capital / principal protected and any other derivative of the term is disallowed
in Singapore as from September 2009.
2 Copyright reserved by the Singapore College of Insurance Limited [M8A Version 1.10]
Illustration
Consider a 5-year note linked to ABC Company’s stock whose

current market price is S$100. Out of every S$100 invested, S$80
is used to buy a zero-coupon bond, with S$100 par value maturing
in five years. The remaining S$20 is used to buy a call option on
ABC shares, with a strike price of S$120.
Upon maturity five years later, the zero-coupon bond pays out
S$100, providing the return of capital portion of the note. If the ABC
share price doubles in value, the option pays off S$80. The total
return to the investor is thus S$180. By contrast, if the S$100 were
invested directly in ABC shares, the return would have been S$200,
ignoring dividends.
If the ABC shares price stays flat in value, the option expires out-of-
the-money. Hence, the total return to the investor is only the S$100
from the zero-coupon bond. Had the S$100 been invested directly in
ABC shares, the return would have been S$100 as well.
In the worst case scenario, the ABC shares decline to S$50,

rendering the option worthless. The return to investors is only the
return of capital of S$100. By contrast, if the S$100 were invested
directly in ABC shares, the investor would have lost half of his
capital.
In other words, this structured product enables the investor to

participate in the price performance of ABC shares without concern
of losing portion of his capital if the shares perform poorly. However,
the downside protection is counterbalanced by the possible loss of
some of the upside potential.
Furthermore, if the zero-coupon bond issuer defaults, the investor

may not be able to recoup his original capital investment.
A zero-coupon bond is used in the structuring because it is cheaper,

leaving more money to be invested in options for the upside
participation. Alternatively, a coupon-bearing bond can be used
instead, to provide more stability in returns, with lower participation on
the upside.
Both bonds and options have fixed maturity dates. Consequently,

structured products have expiry or maturity dates3, and are often issued
in rolling tranches or series. Although product features may be
identical, each series is likely to be priced differently, based on market
conditions at the time of issue.
3
There are a few structured products that do not have maturity dates. One such example, the
tracker certificate, is discussed in Section 3.3 of this chapter.
1.2 What Is A Wrapper?
Structured products can be created and marketed in different formats,

called “wrappers”. The equity-linked note illustrated above is one
possible wrapper in the form of unsecured debenture, i.e. a note.
There are others. The choice of wrapper depends on a number of
factors, including:
regulatory restriction on issuers (e.g. only banks can take deposits,
and only insurance companies can issue insurance policies);
the desired investment freedom (e.g. there are investment
restrictions applicable to collective investment schemes);
desired level of transparency (e.g. structured fund allows
independent valuation with the Net Asset Value (NAV) published on
a regular basis);
the targeted level of returns (e.g. some format is costlier than
others); and
tax consideration in a particular jurisdiction.
The most common wrappers are:

(a) Structured Deposits: Only banks can take deposits. Despite the
name, it is important to note that structured deposits are
considered investment products, and are excluded from the Deposit
Insurance Scheme in Singapore.
(b) Structured Notes: These are unsecured debenture of issuers. By
purchasing the structured notes, the note-holders are lending
money to the issuer.
(c) Structured Funds: These are Collective Investment Schemes (CIS),
also known as investment funds. In Singapore, most Singapore-
domiciled investment funds are structured as trusts, while foreign-
domiciled funds are typically structured as corporations. In the case
of a fund structured as a trust, there is an independent trustee
making sure that the fund manager’s operation of the fund is in
accordance with the trust document and investment mandate. A
similar role exists for the board of directors and / or the depositary
bank for funds structured as corporations.
(d) Structured Investment-linked Life Insurance Policies (ILPs): These
are life insurance policies. As such, only life insurers can issue
structured ILPs. They operate like a term insurance plus a
structured fund, where the term insurance provides insurance
coverage, and the structured fund provides the investment return.
Different wrappers have their distinct advantages and disadvantages

from investment and distribution points of view, as outlined in Table
1.1.
It should be kept in mind that advantages and disadvantages are

relative. For example, the lower return from structured deposits is a
disadvantage for investment purposes, but it provides the advantage of
security of capital. By the same token, while the lower administrative

cost associated with structured deposits may make such products
advantageous in terms of investment returns, it is limited in terms of
product sophistication and flexibility.
Table 1.1: Advantages & Disadvantages Of Different Wrappers
Wrapper Advantages Disadvantages

Structured Lower administrative Returns are lower (in
Deposits cost as the bank general) owing to the
structuring the product cost of providing return
also performs the of capital.
distribution. Investors are unsecured
The bank usually creditors of the issuer in
guarantees return of the event of liquidation.
capital.
Structured Full flexibility in product Investors are unsecured
Notes design. creditors of the issuer in
the event of liquidation.
Prospectus is required,
resulting in higher
issuing cost.
Structured A wide and ready Administrative cost is
Funds distribution network higher due to operating
through existing fund cost of the fund.
distribution channels. Prospectus is required,
In a trust structure, there resulting in higher
is greater transparency issuing cost.
of charges and Product design may be
investment performance. affected by investment
The trustee also acts in restrictions due to
the investors’ best regulatory requirements.
interest.
In a trust structure,
assets are held in trust
for the benefit of the
investors.
Structured A wide and ready Insurers typically
ILPs distribution network outsource the
through existing structuring, which adds
insurance distribution an additional layer of
channels. cost.
Insurance coverage Similar to funds,
being provided, albeit investment restrictions
typically very small. may apply.
1.3 Why Invest In Structured Products?
Structured products can be used as an alternative to a direct

investment in traditional asset classes, especially in markets where
direct access is restricted. For example, when a market is closed to
foreign investors, structured products may be the only way to replicate
the performance of that market, without directly investing in securities
of that market.
Structured products can offer access to exotic asset classes typically

out of reach for individual investors. They are extremely versatile, and
can be tailor-made to deliver specific risk / return profile to suit the
investor’s needs, such as leveraged returns, guaranteed return of
capital, or conditional capital protection.
Structured products can be used as part of the asset allocation process

to reduce risk exposure of a portfolio.
Investment banks typically can issue structured products quickly,

enabling investors to swiftly respond to market trends.
While structured products may suit investors’ particular investment

needs, there are associated risks which may not be immediately
apparent to investors. These risk factors are discussed in Chapter 2.
1.4 Challenges Facing Structured Products
Owing to increasing product complexity, correct pricing and efficient

risk management are two challenges facing financial institutions.
The difficulty with pricing is that markets for instruments used to

construct structured products may not be liquid enough to achieve
meaningful mark-to-market values. The lack of transparency on the
hedging and transaction costs implicit in the structure also contributes
to the difficulty in getting the price right. Moreover, pricing is done by
pricing software. Depending on the sophistication of the model and the
accuracy of input parameters, the outcome of the pricing software is
only as reliable as the built-in modelling techniques and assumptions
adopted.
Pricing and risk management go hand-in-hand. If financial institutions

find it difficult to price the products correctly, then it is understandable
that they find it difficult to quantify and monitor the associated risks.
Similar to pricing models, the mathematical models used in risk
management may not be able to fully capture the dynamics, risks and
cost structure of complex products. The likelihood of hidden risks not
being detected early enough is increasing with the growing complexity
of structured products.
2. COMPONENTS OF A STRUCTURED PRODUCT
There are two components in every investment transaction, namely the

principal invested, and the investment return generated. The purpose of
investment is to maximise return, while safeguarding principal. An ambitious
investor may be willing to do so at the risk of losing all or a portion of his
principal. A more conservative investor may be willing to accept a lower
return in order to protect his principal.
Figure 1.1: Components Of A Structured Product
Upside Investment
Potential Return
Option
Principal
Return
of
Fixed Principal
Income
At Issue At Maturity
Structured products are no exception; they consist of the same two

components of principal and return. As illustrated in Figure 1.1, the return of
principal is achieved through a fixed income instrument, which provides
periodic interest payments (if a coupon-bearing instrument is used) and the
return of principal on maturity. The investment return is delivered through a
derivative instrument, which provides additional return based on the price
performance of the underlying assets, namely equities, fixed income,
currencies, or commodities. The underlying assets can be a single security,
or a mixture of securities, depending on the investment target.
2.1 Principal Risk Versus Return Risk
Since different financial instruments are used for the principal and the
return components, they are subject to different primary risk factors.
The risk to principal is the credit risk to the fixed income instrument
used, which are usually senior, unsecured debts. Should the issuer
default, the investor is one of many general creditors of the issuer.
Consequently, the credit worthiness of the issuer of the fixed income
instrument, which may be different from the issuer of the structured
product itself, is the primary risk to the principal component of
structured products. To mitigate this risk, the issuer of the structured
products may provide a guarantee, either by itself or by a third party,
enhancing the credit security of the products. However, investors
should note that the cost of risk mitigation can affect the potential
returns.
The primary risk to the return component is market volatility. All

derivative contracts have specified expiry dates. It is the contractual
value of the underlying assets on the expiry date that determines the
amount of return, if the rights under the contract have not been
exercised before expiry. A sudden fall in the value of underlying assets
on expiry date may wipe out the entire cumulative gain throughout the
life of the contract. As the contract expires after expiry date, the
investor has no chance to ride out the sudden downturn. This is unlike
a direct investment in stocks, where the investors may choose to hold
on to the stocks in hope of price recovery at a later date.
For example, a product promised to deliver a return equals to 50% of

the STI performance measured from the Inception Date to the Maturity
Date. Despite the bull market during the whole investment period, if STI
registers a negative performance on the Maturity Date, the product is
not able to deliver any performance. This is the case, even if the STI
enjoys a miraculous recovery on the day after the Maturity Date.
The return component is also subject to the credit risk of the

counterparty to the derivative contract. That is, the counterparty may
not be able to deliver the contractual value when due.
There is a trade-off between safety of principal and participation in an

upside performance. The degree of safety can be reduced in exchange
for a greater participation in performance. For example, a product may
be designed to provide for return of 75% of principal, by reducing the
investment in fixed income instrument by 25%, permitting a larger
investment in derivatives, and thus a greater upside potential. This
product still provides a downside protection, although not 100% of
principal.
Figure 1.2: Trade-off Between Safety Of Principal

And Participation In Performance
Return
Upside
Potential
Option
Option
75% Principal
Principal
Fixed Principal
Income Fixed Protection
Income
At Issue At Maturity
2.2 Trade-off Between Risk And Return
In the realm of finance, risk refers to uncertainty. When it is said that

an investment is of high risk, it means that the probability of the
anticipated return which may not be realised is higher as compared to
other investments. It also means that all or part of the principal may be
lost. Naturally, investors demand to be properly compensated for the
risk that they take on. This is the reason why investors expect higher
returns from risky investments, i.e. compensate for the higher
probability that the returns may not materialise.
However, this does not mean that all risky investments have the
potential of high returns. There are bad investments that offer low pay-
off for high risk taken. By the same token, it is conceivable, though
rare, that there are opportunities offering high return at low risk. The
art of investment is to correctly assess the risk-return profile of each
opportunity and decide whether the trade-off between risk and return is
acceptable.
Figure 1.3 illustrates the relationship between risk and return. The
northeast quadrant represents investments that offer high return at high
risk. These are for ambitious investors who can afford to take the
maximum loss under the worst-case scenario. By contrast, the
southwest quadrant represents investments that offer low return for
low risk. These are for investors who are willing to accept a lower
expected return in exchange for higher assurance of the return of their
principals.
While it is intuitive to avoid unworthy investments represented in the

southeast quadrant, it takes proper analysis to identify them. At the
opposite corner, there may be rare opportunities out there, offering high
potential returns at low risk. Typically, these opportunities can be at

the beginning stage of a breakthrough technology or emerging industry.
However, they often turn out to be “too good to be true”.
Figure 1.3: Risk And Return Trade-off
Too good to be true: Low risk

with high potential return.
Return
Bold The principal may

Rare Gems Investments be at risk; the
potential return is
high, but not
certain.
Safe Unworthy
Investments Investments
Risk
The principal is relatively safe; the

return is low, but is relatively certain.
3. TYPES OF STRUCTURED PRODUCTS
Structured products are by nature not homogeneous - as a large number of

derivatives and underlying can be used. However, the more popular ones can
be classified into the categories as described below.
Interest rate-linked: Structured product designed to be linked to interest
rates such as Libor or Euribor.
Equity-linked: It refers to an investment instrument that combines the
characteristics of a zero, or low coupon bond or note with a return
component, based on the performance of a single equity security, a
basket of equity securities, or an equity index.
FX (Foreign Exchange) and Commodity-linked: This involves an investment
instrument linked to the performance of a specific commodity, a basket of
commodities, some foreign exchange rate, or a basket of foreign exchange
rates.
Hybrid-linked: It is a structured note, sometimes called "hybrid debt". It is
an intermediate term debt security, whose interest payments are
determined by some type of formula tied to the movement of an interest
rate, stock, stock index, commodity, or currency.
Credit-linked: A form of funded credit derivative. It is structured as a

security with an embedded credit default swap allowing the issuer to
transfer a specific credit risk to credit investors. The issuer is not obligated
to repay the debt if a specified event occurs. This eliminates a third-party
insurance provider.
Market-linked: A structured product that is linked to a certain or a basket
of market indices.
Structured products are versatile in the sense that they can be linked to
single or multiple securities, in any or a combination of asset classes, of
short or long durations, denominated in any currencies, providing full or no
return of capital. Thus, it is easy to understand why there is a wide range of
structured products, both traded on the exchange and off the exchange.
According to a survey of European distributors of structured products 4, 70%

of structured products were linked to equities, 22% fixed income, 3%
foreign currency and 2% commodities. While the global figures may differ
from the European experience, it is safe to say that structured products are
predominantly based on equities as the underlying assets.
There is no universal way of classifying financial products. Traditional

investments such as CIS and ILPs can be classified in a number of ways: by
geographical focus; by asset class; by maturity; etc. Likewise, structured
products can be classified in different ways, e.g. by underlying asset classes;
by risk-return profiles; or by investment objectives. We have discussed about
structured products based on their underlying asset classes. Now, we will
discuss structured products based on their investment objectives, which
correspond to their risk levels:
(a) products designed to protect capital;
(b) yield enhancement products; and
(c) performance participation products.
For example, there are structured deposits based on equities or currencies

designed to preserve capital; structured notes linked to equities or bonds
designed to preserve capital; and structured funds or ILPs aimed at
preserving capital. Similarly, yield enhancement and performance
participation products can also use different underlying asset classes for
different investment objectives.
4
“Structured products: Double your guess for retail market’s size”, Euromoney, September 2008.
Figure 1.4: Risk-Return Profile Of Structured Products
Expected
Returns
Performance
Participation
Yield
Enhancement
Designed to
Protect Capital
Risk
The risk-return profile is different for these three types of structured

products. Products designed to preserve capital carries the lowest degree
risk, and correspondingly lower expected return, because part of the
investments goes to protecting the downside. The yield enhancement
products are riskier with higher return potential relative to products aimed to
preserve capital, because a greater portion of investments goes to delivering
upside potential. Participation products are the riskiest of the three, as they
often provide no downside protection at all; the entire investments are put to
pursuing performance.
Investors are often attracted by high potential payout products. However, a

structured product delivers return to investors only when the:
(a) anticipated market view is correct;
(b) strategy or structure to capture the market view is appropriate; and
(c) pricing on the structure is reasonable.
3.1 Products Designed To Protect Capital
These products are designed using a fixed income instrument to preserve

all or majority of the principal component at maturity, so that the
investors are protected to a certain degree if the return component of the
products does not perform well under adverse market conditions.
These products are structured by combining a bond or a note with a call

option on the underlying assets. A zero-coupon bond is typically used for
the principal component. The underlying is most commonly a single
stock, a basket of stocks, or an index.
Some examples of this type of products include:

Structured deposits;
Equity or credit-linked notes, to the extent that the fixed income

component of the product is structured to provide the return of
capital; and
Capital guaranteed funds.
However, downside protection is only as good as the credit worthiness of

the party providing the protection. The credit standing of the protection-
giver is a major consideration in the risk-return analysis, especially for
long duration products, where the financial position is more prone to
change.
The protection in a structured product is provided by the underlying fixed

income instrument. Therefore, the protection-giver is the issuer of the
bond used in the structuring. If the bond-issuer defaults, the issuer of the
structured product is not obligated to step in to make good, unless the
product-issuer has given its guarantee to the investors. For this reason,
investors need to consider the credit worthiness of the bond-issuer, rather
than the product-issuer in assessing the strength of the downside
protection.
Even if the bond-issuer does not default, the principal may still be at risk,
despite the best intention of the product design. This is because the
return of principal is only applicable at maturity. Similar to the plight of a
depositor breaking a fixed deposit, an investor wishing to cash-in his
structured investments before maturity date often suffers losses of
amount dependent on the mark-to-market adjustments. Therefore,
investors should take into account their investment time horizon when
choosing a product to avoid timing mismatches. For longer-term products,
the possibility of early cash-in resulting from unforeseen circumstances is
higher. Thus, the early redemption risk and market volatility risk are
correspondingly higher.
3.2 Yield Enhancement Products
Some investors have higher risk tolerance, and seek returns higher than
those from traditional fixed income instruments, at slightly higher risk.
This is not possible to achieve with traditional investment vehicles,
without taking on excessive credit risk. In response to such demand, yield
enhancing structured products have been engineered to achieve just that.
The most common of such products are reverse convertible bonds and
discount certificates.
(a) Reverse Convertible Bonds

Like all other structured products, a reverse convertible bond is an
unsecured debt instrument5. It is issued as a note that is linked to a
single stock. It has features of a fixed income instrument under
normal circumstances: periodic interest payments (if the note so
5
Examples of exception to this are structured funds, which are discussed in greater detail in later
chapters of this study guide.
provides), and payment of the par value of the note upon maturity.
However, if the price of the underlying stock falls below a pre-
determined level, called the "kick-in" level, the investor receives a
pre-determined number of shares of the underlying stock in lieu of
the par value of the note at maturity. The kick-in level is usually
20% to 30% below the price of the underlying stock on issue date.
In terms of structure, a reverse convertible bond consists of:

a bond, providing the periodic interest payments (if any) and par
value at maturity; and
a written put option (i.e. the investor is selling a put option),
providing the shares in lieu of par value at maturity if the kick-in
level is breached.
The upside return to investors is capped at the yield on the note,

while there is no protection on the downside as the value of the
stock falls. To compensate for the capped upside, the yield is
higher than that for traditional bonds.
While most reverse convertible bonds are linked to single stocks,

they can also be linked to other classes of assets or baskets of
assets.
(b) Discount Certificates

A discount certificate has the same risk-return profile as a reverse
convertible, except it is structured differently.
A discount certificate allows the investors to participate in the

performance of the underlying stock up to a pre-determined
maximum level, called the “cap-strike” or simply “cap”. The product
is sold at a discount to compensate for the capped upside. At
maturity, the investor receives either a cash settlement or the
underlying shares, depending on the underlying share price such as:
Scenario 1: The price of the underlying stock is above the cap-
strike – The investor receives a cash settlement equal to the
cap-strike and realises the maximum possible profit; or
Scenario 2: The price of the underlying stock is at or below the
cap-strike – The investor receives the underlying stock.
Both reverse convertible bonds and discount certificates offer capped

upside potential without a downside protection. They share the same risk-
return profiles, although they are structured very differently. Discount
certificates are structured by combining two different types of options.
(Transaction cost may reduce the actual return from the product.)
Figure 1.5: Payoff Of A Yield Enhancement Structured Product
Profit Price of
Underlying Stock
Payoff to Investors
Kick-in Level
or Cap-Strike
Loss
Something To Keep In Mind

Yield enhancement products do not provide downside protection. The
investor’s risk exposure follows exactly that of the underlying stock when
the stock price falls below the kick-in level. Investors considering these
products should consider and be comfortable with the downside risk of
the underlying stock.
Financial advisers and sales representatives should clearly explain the

risks to investors. They should never suggest that a yield enhancement
product could be a substitute for conventional bond, because the risk-
return profiles are fundamentally different, as the figure above illustrates.
3.3 Participation Products
“Participation” refers to participation in the price performance of the

underlying assets. These products typically offer full upside potential with
no downside protection. There are variations where there are capped
upside potential, and / or limited or conditional downside protection,
depending on investors’ desired risk-return profile. Compared to the
previous two types of structured products, participation products
generally carry higher degrees of risk, with corresponding higher levels of
potential return, because of their more aggressive pursuit of upside
potentials.
Participation products are legally unsecured debentures. They are

commonly marketed under the name of “certificates” or “notes”. They
are not to be confused with “certificate of deposits”6.
6
Certificate of Deposits (CDs) are bank deposits covered by the Deposit Insurance Scheme in
Singapore.
Without any downside protection element in participation products, there

is typically no need to involve fixed income instruments for the principal
component of these products. Instead, derivatives contracts are used for
both principal and return components to achieve the desired risk-return
pattern.
There are many examples of products in this category. Three are

discussed below, as an illustration of the versatility of product design of
participation products, namely tracker certificate, bonus certificate and
airbag certificate.
(a) Tracker Certificate

A tracker certificate tracks the performance of an underlying asset. It
has neither upside cap nor downside protection. Its risk profile is
identical to the underlying asset that it tracks. The reason for its
creation is to give investors access to investments otherwise not
possible or not economically feasible, such as a tailored-made index.
A tracker certificate is one of the few structured products that may

have no maturity date.
Figure 1.6: Payoff Of A Tracker Certificate
Profit
Payout to Investors
Loss Price of Underlying

Assets
(b) Bonus Certificate

Bonus certificates are tracker certificates with the conditional
downside protection which hinges on a pre-determined barrier. They
are designed to give the downside protection only to the level of the
barrier. So long as the price of the underlying asset does not drop
below the barrier, the payoff to the investor at maturity is no lower
than an agreed amount (the “bonus”). However, if the barrier is
crossed during any point during the life of the certificate, the
protection is off, and the investor is paid the value of the underlying
asset at maturity.
The feature where the protection no longer applies is called “knock-

out”. The knock-out feature is inherent from the barrier options
(down and out options) used in their structures. (See Chapter 3 for a
discussion on exotic options.)
Depending on the product design, a bonus certificate may be

knocked-out anytime during its life, or may be knocked-out only at
maturity. In the first case, once the knock-out is triggered, the
protection is gone for the remainder life of the certificate, even if the
stock price subsequently recovers above the barrier level before the
expiry date.
Figure below illustrates the payoff pattern of a bonus certificate. As

can be seen, there is a discontinuity, representing a sudden drop in
the payoff, at the barrier level where the knock-out takes place. At or
above the barrier level, the investor gets paid at least the bonus
amount. Below the barrier level, the investor bears the full downside
of the underlying asset.
Figure 1.7: Payoff Of A Bonus Certificate
Profit
Barrier level:
Knock-out
takes place.
Payout to Investors
Price of Underlying
Loss Assets
(c) Airbag Certificate

With a bonus certificate, a “disaster” occurs at the barrier level,
when the protection against price decline is knocked-out. Like a
motorist in a car accident, an investor may want to have some
protection against such disastrous situations. An airbag certificate
was created to reduce the impact of knock-out, extending the
downside protection up to a pre-determined airbag level.
The downside protection is still knocked-out at the airbag level.

However, investors have downside protection to the specified airbag
level, and there is no sudden drop in payoff at that level. Below the
airbag level, the payoff remains above the price of the underlying
asset until it loses all value.
One advantage of an airbag certificate over a bonus certificate is that

it gives the underlying stock a chance to rebound during the life of
the certificate.
Airbag certificates can be designed to have different airbag level to

suit an investor’s particular risk tolerance. Naturally, higher the level
of protection, lower the return potential.
Figure 1.8: Payoff Of An Airbag Certificate
Profit
Airbag Level:
e.g. 35% of
Spot Price
Payout to Investors
Price of Underlying
Loss Assets
4. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES OF STRUCTURED PRODUCTS
4.1 Similarities In Features
One commonality among structured products is the use of financial

derivatives to either amplify gains, or hedge away risks, or both. While
the types of derivatives instruments used vary widely depending on
investment objectives, structured products that aim to preserve capital
typically use bonds as the underlying structure to provide return of all
or part of capital at maturity.
There are different ways to achieve the same risk-return profiles, using
different financial instruments. Examples which we have seen earlier
are the reverse convertible bonds and discount certificates in Section
3.2: reverse convertible is constructed by using a bond and a put
option; discount certificate is constructed by using a call option and a
down-and-out option.
Why do issuers adopt different structures? The most common answer

is tax. Dividend income and capital gains have different tax treatments
in most countries. Different structures may achieve the same
investment objectives, but returns to investors may be different,
depending on the investor’s tax domicile.
4.2 Differences In Features
Structured products with the same structure and wrapper may have
different features. One notable example is the call feature. A debt
security with an “issuer callable” feature may be redeemed (or “called”)
before its maturity date, at the issuer’s discretion. The debt security
usually specifies a minimum period before the debt can be called, and
the call price is typically higher than the par value on a sliding scale,
depending on how early the debt is called.
The issuer is likely to exercise his right to “call” when the interest rate
has declined, so that he can re-finance his debt at a lower rate. When
the interest rate is low, the price of debt securities is high. The lender
(i.e. investor) may be unable to replace his investment at the same rate
of return. Consequently, callable securities expose investors to interest
rate risk and reinvestment risk.
The performance of structured products using callable securities in their

structures is affected when the callable securities are called. Does it
mean that callable securities are undesirable and should be avoided at
all times? Not necessarily so, there are certain benefits to callable
securities to compensate for the additional risks.
Callable securities are cheaper than straight, non-callable securities, and

pay higher coupons. This is comparable to selling (writing) an option;
the option writer gets a premium upfront, but has a downside risk if the
option is exercised. In fact, the price of a callable bond is the price of
straight bond, less the price of a call option. A decision to invest in a
callable bond is an investment decision, after weighing the associated
benefits and risks.
Debt securities are not the only ones that may be called. There are
callable (also known as “redeemable”) preference shares as well.
4.3 Differences In Rights
Not all bondholders are created equal. Depending on the type of bonds
that they hold, they have different rights even though they are creditors
of the same issuer.
There are two types of bonds, namely senior bonds and subordinated
bonds. In case of liquidation, holders of senior bonds have priority over
shares and subordinated bonds. Repayment for subordinated bonds, on
the other hand, takes place after all other creditors with higher priority
have been paid. As a result, subordinated bonds usually have a lower
credit rating than senior bonds, and may pay a higher interest rate to
compensate the higher risk.
Subordinated bonds may be issued in tranches. The holders of senior

tranches are paid back first, the subordinated tranches later. Issuers
may have rating agencies to rate the tranches separately. It is
important to remember that a senior tranche of a subordinated bond

still ranks lower than other senior bonds. That is, a AAA rated tranche
of a junk bond is still a junk bond.
4.4 Similarities And Differences In Governance
The governance of structured products depends on the wrapper used.

Some products may be listed on a stock exchange, in which case, they
are governed by additional requirements as imposed by the listing
exchange.
(a) Listed Products

Structured notes and structured funds can be listed. There are a
number of structured notes listed on the Singapore Exchange
(SGX), under the categories of Exchange-Traded Notes (ETNs) and
Certificates.
Listed structured funds come under the generic umbrella of

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). Keep in mind that not all ETFs are
structured funds. Although majority of ETFs are tracker funds,
some ETFs make direct investments, while others use derivatives,
to replicate the underlying index. Only those ETFs that use
derivatives are structured funds. They are also known as “synthetic
ETFs”.
Listed products in Singapore are subject to the oversight of SGX. In

evaluating a structured product’s eligibility to list, SGX considers
the reputation of the financial institutions issuing the securities, its
financial strength, and the liquidity of the proposed listed securities.
To ensure liquidity, SGX requires that at least 75% of the securities

must be spread out to a minimum of 100 investors in the case of
ETNs and certificates. In the case of ETFs, the fund size must be at
least S$20 million, and at least 25% of the fund's total number of
issued shares, excluding treasury shares is held by at least 500
public shareholders (100 in the case of a venture capital fund). The
minimum investor spread requirement does not apply if a
Designated-Market Maker7 has been appointed to provide liquidity.
7
A market maker’s duty is to make sure that investors can readily buy and sell their investments.
When an investor want to sell (buy) his investments, but there is no one willing to buy (sell) from
him, the market-maker steps in and completes the trade. In doing so, the market-makers literally
"make a market.”
Liquidity is the main advantage of listed structured products over

other structured products. Nonetheless, a listing does not
guarantee liquidity, as the trading can be thin due to the lack of
market demand. Even with a Designated Market-Maker, there is no
guarantee that the investor will be able to dispose off his
investment at a price which he considers reasonable8.
(b) Collective Investment Scheme (CIS)

A CIS is a pooled investment vehicle, where individual investors
invest in a common fund, and a professional investment manager
directs the investments and daily operation of the fund. A
structured fund is a CIS and must follow the regulatory
requirements for CIS, in particular, the Code on CIS (the “Code”)
issued by the MAS.
A CIS offered in Singapore to the public must be either authorised or

recognised by the MAS.
The legal form of a CIS is typically either a trust or a corporation. In

Singapore, most authorised CIS take the trust structure, known as
unit trusts. Investors, as unit-holders, are beneficiary owners of the
trust. A trustee is appointed to safeguard the beneficiary owners’
interests. In contrast, most recognised CIS in Singapore take the
structure of a corporation.
The assets of a CIS are held by a third-party custodian such as the

trustee. Thus, investors in structured funds need not be concerned
about the credit risk of the product-issuer, although they are still
subject to credit risk of the CIS’ investments. By contrast, investors
in structured deposits and structured notes are general creditors of
the financial institutions issuing the products in case of bankruptcy.
(c) ILPs
An ILP is a life insurance policy, regulated under the Insurance Act
(Cap. 142). The regulatory framework for ILPs is therefore, different
from that for CIS which is governed by the Securities and Futures
Act (Cap. 289), although both Acts are administered by the MAS.
Only life insurers licensed under the Insurance Act (Cap. 142) may
issue ILPs. Similarly, only fund managers licensed under the
Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) may manage authorised CIS.
All life insurance products, aside from Term Insurance, Personal

Accident and Health Insurance policies, contain a protection
element and an investment element. An ILP is the only type of life
8
There is a market-maker pricing practice known as “stub quotes”, where market-makers submit
bid and offer prices at extremely high or low levels which are not expected to be taken. For
example, the stub quotes can be a bid of a penny to buy (from investors) or an offer of a
thousand dollars to sell (to investors). Since 6 December 2010, the US Securities & Exchange
Commission has banned the practice of stub quotes, and required market-makers to quote within
8% of the national best bid or offer. In Singapore, the maximum bid-offer spread is individually
agreed upon between the Designated Market-maker and SGX for each listed structured product.
insurance product that allows the policy owner to choose the

investment options for the investment portion of his policy, from a
list of funds.
The available funds may be linked to an external CIS, or may be

internal funds managed by the insurer. Each internal ILP fund must
be kept separate from any of the insurer’s other businesses. Such
in-house ILP funds are “insurance funds”. Insurance funds are not
trusts, but they have quasi trust status, because the Insurance Act
(Cap. 142) provides policy owners priority claim on insurance fund
assets over general creditors in case of bankruptcy.
The investment portion of a structured ILP is a CIS by nature,

although not by legal structure. To ensure consistent regulatory
treatment of ILPs and CIS, Notice No. MAS 307 issued under the
Insurance Act (Cap. 142) specifies that the investment guidelines
under the Code on CIS apply to ILP funds as well.
For further details on the rules and regulations, refer to the CMFAS
Module 5: Rules and Regulations for Financial Advisory Services
study guide published by the Singapore College of Insurance.
5. SUITABILITY
There is a great variety of structured products with full spectrum of risk-return

profiles. It should be apparent to readers by now that they are not categorically
more risky, or offer higher returns compared to traditional investments.
However, their structures are without doubt more complex. With the exception
of a few basic products, many structured products may be too complicated for
the average investors to fully grasp how the products perform relative to
direct investments in the underlying assets.
MAS Guidelines on Fair Dealing, issued in April 2009, have outlined five desired
outcomes of fair dealing with clients. Outcome 2 requires financial institutions
to offer products and services that are suitable for their target customer
segments. Apart from regulatory requirements, professional ethics also dictate
that financial advisers and representatives of financial institutions (collectively
known as “Advisers”) take into account suitability of products in their
recommendations. Given the complexity of structured products, the challenge
is how to determine suitability.
Determination of suitability begins with knowing your client - his investment

objectives, risk appetite, time horizon, financial position, investment knowledge
and experience. The second step is for the Adviser to know the products under
consideration, so that the product features and risk factors can be explained to
the client in a way that he can understand. While it is not necessary (nor
possible sometimes) for the client to understand the technical details of a
structured product, he must know, at the very least, the payoffs under
different circumstances (including the worst case scenario) and the risk factors
affecting the payoffs, so that he has the right expectation of product

performance, when market condition changes.
5.1 Know Your Clients
(a) Investment Objectives

Investors have three basic investment objectives, namely safety of
principal, stability of investment income, and potential for capital
appreciation. In addition, the investor wants to be able to convert his
investments into cash at a reasonable price, when the need arises.
Although liquidity does not directly relate to investment return, it is
nonetheless an important consideration, and reasonable expectation.
These four objectives (safety, income, growth and liquidity) are not
mutually exclusive. For example, it is not uncommon for a client to
wish to protect his capital, and seek capital appreciation
opportunity in investments that can be easily converted to cash,
when needed. However, there are trade-offs among these
objectives. To pursue capital appreciation, the client must sacrifice
some degree of safety. To achieve the desired degree of liquidity,
certain potentially high-yielding, but illiquid asset classes are
precluded.
Most investment strategies are guided by one pre-eminent

objective, with other objectives being less significant in the overall
scheme.
Advisers should help clients to determine their investment

objectives based on their personal circumstances and risk
appetites9. The pool of structured products is wide enough to suit
most combinations of safety, income and growth objectives.
However, most structured products are not liquid, and the market
“fair” value is difficult to determine. They are suited for clients with
low liquidity requirements, intending to hold the products to
maturity.
(b) Investment Time Horizon

With a few exceptions, structured products have fixed maturity
dates. Cashing-in before maturity date may not be allowed and, if
allowed, often comes with substantial mark-to-market adjustments.
Hence, it is important to choose a product that fits the investor’s
investment time horizon.
Some structured funds which are open-ended in nature improves the

liquidity. Nonetheless, the unit redemption is often restricted under
severe market conditions. (More on this will be discussed in Chapter
4.)
9
It is outside the scope of this module to discuss the steps involving financial planning and needs
analysis.
(c) Investment Knowledge And Experience

Structured products are highly complex. The extent to which the
clients are able to understand the products depends on their
investment experience and level of financial literacy. It is difficult for
the clients, without prior experience with derivatives, for example, to
grasp the workings of structured products. In advising the clients
with little investment experience or financial knowledge, Advisers
should take extra steps in assessing the clients’ understanding of the
recommended products before implementing the recommendation.
Financial institutions should have internal policies and procedures in
place to guide their Advisers on the steps to take when dealing with
inexperienced clients.
5.2 Know Your Products
(a) Understanding The Products

Financial institutions are required to train their Advisers on the
features and risk-return profile of any investment products that they
recommend. Although the financial institutions have the duty to
provide the training, the responsibility of product knowledge resides
with the Advisers.
All financial products have trade-offs between risk and return.

Advisers should present products in a balanced way, highlighting the
benefits as well as the risks. Each product has been designed to meet
a particular combination of investment objectives (safety, income and
growth). Advisers should understand the targeted client segment of
each product, and know how each product responds to different
market conditions.
(b) Explaining To Clients

The financial institution should provide every customer with all
relevant information, such as prospectus, pricing statement, Product
Highlights Sheet, fact-sheet and marketing materials, before the
customer makes a financial decision. It should be noted that the
quality of information provided is more important than the quantity.
More information is not necessarily better. On the contrary, the
customers might become inundated and confused by voluminous
amount of information given.
Clarity of information contributes greatly to the client’s understanding

of a financial product. The Fair Dealing Guidelines require disclosures
to customers to be in plain language, avoiding technical and
misleading terms, and presented in a format that is simple to read
and easy to understand.
The client’s financial experience and literacy affect what is deemed

“clear”. For example, an investor who is not familiar with the
financial derivatives contracts may not understand the significance of
the expiry date.
It is not easy to explain a complex product in simple language. One

way to meet the Fair Dealing Outcome is to explain the product
features by presenting a range of possible outcomes for the
product. For example, two scenarios should be highlighted for yield
enhancement type of structured products as follows:
(a) the best case scenario, where the underlying outperforms, and
the return to the customer is capped at the cap-strike level; and
(b) the worst case scenario, where the underlying underperforms,
and the customer loses a portion or all of his principal sum.
This is especially important when customers are opting for such

products as an alternative to traditional fixed income investments.
The worst case scenario should sufficiently demonstrate to
customers that yield-enhancing structured products are
fundamentally different from traditional bonds and notes.
Chapter
2 RISK CONSIDERATIONS
OF STRUCTURED PRODUCTS
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. Market Risk
2. Issuer Or Swap Counterparty Credit Risk
3. Liquidity Risk
4. Foreign Exchange (FX) Risk
5. Structural Risk
6. Other Risks
KEY LEARNING POINTS

understand the key risk factors of a structured product
identify and explain the various risks of structured products
2. Risk Considerations Of Structured Products
1. MARKET RISK
Market risk refers to the price volatility that comes from the fluctuation in
market prices of the underlying assets.
Market price of a security is the current price at which the security can be
bought or sold. In theory, market price is the present value of the issuer’s
future profits. Factors affecting the profitability – present and future – affect
the current market price. In practice, market price is determined by supply and
demand, to a large extent.
Many factors can cause price fluctuation. Two key factors are described below.
(a) General Market Risk

Financial investments do not exist outside of the economy. They are
affected by the general economic conditions and market outlook. Given the
global connectivity that exists today, market prices are affected not only
by domestic conditions, but also global environment.
Factors such as interest rates, inflation, exchange rate, commodity prices,

and others can cause prices to fluctuate, as they directly affect
profitability. For example, consider the stock price of a company. When
interest rate goes up, the cost of borrowing goes up, and the profit comes
down. When local currency appreciates, the cost of imported materials is
cheaper after conversion, and the profit goes up if the goods are sold
locally at the same price. However, for an export-oriented company, the
profit may come down, as the revenue is in foreign currency which is now
lower after converting back to local currency.
These factors are correlated, and their combined impact on prices is

sometimes difficult to anticipate.
(b) Issuer-specific Risk

While general market risks affect the prices of all securities, there are risk
factors that only affect the price of a particular issuer’s security. An
obvious example is a downgrade in credit rating of a company, which
creates downward pressure on the prices of its shares and bonds. This in
turn causes certain derivative contracts based on that company’s shares or
bonds to lose value.
Other examples of issuer-specific risks include operational risk, business

risk, litigation and regulatory action.
Issuer-specific risks can affect an entire industry sector. For example, a

large court award for liability lawsuits against one tobacco company may
affect tobacco manufacturers as a whole, leading to price fluctuation for
securities and derivatives based on tobacco companies.
For a particular structured product, it is important to identify the risk drivers

that influence its market price. As mentioned in the previous chapter, there are
two components in any structured product. The main risk drivers for the fixed
income component are interest rate and credit standing of the issuer.
The risk drivers for the derivatives component are linked to the underlying
assets of the derivatives contracts, as the price movement of the derivatives
contracts follows the price movement of the underlying assets, be it an equity
index, or a specific commodity, or a basket of stocks or currencies. The price
of the derivatives is also influenced by the credit worthiness of the
counterparty. The price of the derivative contract goes down when the
counterparty’s ability to fulfil his contractual obligation is in doubt.
Foreign exchange rate is another risk driver, to the extent that foreign
currencies are involved in either component.
2. ISSUER OR SWAP COUNTERPARTY CREDIT RISK
Counterparty is a party with whom a transaction is done. Using a crude oil

forward contract as an example, A agrees to buy crude oil from B at an agreed
price on a future date. A and B are counterparties to each other. The
counterparty risk to A is that B will not deliver the amount and the grade of
crude oil as promised. The counterparty risk to B is that A will not pay the
amount as agreed.
The counterparty’s inability to meet contractual obligation is called “default”.

The word “default” encompasses a range of failure to meet obligations such as,
paying interest when due, making futures delivery, repayment of loan, etc. It
does not necessarily mean a full blown legal bankruptcy of the counterparty.
There are many possible causes of defaults, ranging from short-term liquidity
crunch due to temporary business or operational tribulation, to more permanent
changes in financial position leading to loss of funding facilities. Regulatory
action or prohibition may also prevent a counterparty from meeting his
commitments.
As investment return from structured products is mainly supported by

derivative contracts, failure of the counterparties to deliver their commitments
results in losses to investors in the structured products. There are two ways to
mitigate the counterparty risk.
One mitigation method is to use publicly-traded derivatives products. The

counterparty risk is minimised when the transaction takes place on an
exchange, because the exchange provides the guarantee that contractual
obligations are fulfilled through the concept of central clearing party. Note that
there is still a risk that the exchange itself may default, although the risk may
be low.
For non-publicly traded, i.e. over the counter (OTC) derivatives products, it is
increasingly common to require counterparty to put up collaterals to back the
promises. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), the
trade association representing participants in the OTC derivatives industry, has
developed a standardised legal document which regulates collaterals for
derivative transactions. It is available for consideration in negotiating

collaterals for OTC derivatives contracts.
Since the financial crisis started in 2007, the use of collateralisation has gained
popularity. Based on the latest ISDA survey results released in April 2010,
78% of all OTC derivatives transactions by large dealers in 2009 were
supported by collaterals. The figure is 97% for credit derivatives specifically.
The total amount of collateral in circulation was US$4 trillion in 2008 (the most
recent figure available at time of writing), nearly doubled from US$2.1 trillion in
2007, and tripled from US$1.3 trillion in 2006.
Payment netting is also commonly used to reduce counterparty risk for both
OTC and exchange-traded products. Payment netting minimises the need for
funds and securities to change hands, whereby maximises the likelihood that,
at the end of the day, every party receives what it should get.
3. LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity from an institution’s perspective refers to insufficient cash to meet its

cash flow requirements. This can be a temporary problem and does not indicate
a systemic issue. For example, market losses can result in margin calls on
futures contracts, causing the institution a temporary cash crunch. A financially
strong institution is able to borrow money or sell assets to meet a temporary
surge in demand for cash payment or collateral.
Liquidity shortfall can also be the result of a fundamental change in the

institution’s financial position. For example, a negative change in its credit
rating leads to its inability to borrow money, or results in an increase in
collaterals required by lenders. If poorly managed, liquidity risk can lead to
bankruptcy.
When an institution is exposed to liquidity risk, its financial position and

resulting credit standing are inevitably affected, leading to a possible
downgrade in its securities and loss of values to their investors.
Liquidity from investor’s perspective refers to the ease of converting his

investments into cash. Publicly traded products tend to have greater liquidity
over products traded OTC, because there is a ready market. However, just
because a product is listed on an exchange, it does not guarantee liquidity, as
the investor may be unable to sell his investments for a reasonable price due to
lack of demand. There are examples of illiquid shares listed on the exchange,
where the trading volume is very thin each day.
Products invested in illiquid assets often have lock-up periods, during which the
investors cannot liquidate or cash-out their investment holdings. For example,
some hedge funds have lock-up periods of one to three years. Some
investment funds do not have lock-up periods per se, but the asset valuation is
only done monthly or quarterly. In effect, investors cannot exit these funds in
between valuation dates.
Some products depend on market-makers to provide liquidity. A market

maker’s duty is to make sure that investors can readily buy and sell their
investments. When an investor wants to sell his investments, but there is no
one in the market willing to buy from him, the market-maker is obligated to
step in and be the counterparty. In doing so, the market-maker literally "makes
a market".
4. FOREIGN EXCHANGE (FX) RISK
Investors in structured products are exposed to FX risk in two ways.
First, if his investments are denominated in a foreign currency, he may suffer a

loss on principal when he converts the maturity payment (made in foreign
currency) back into local currency.
For example, US$1 was worth S$1.5336 in 2006, but is only worth S$1.2875
in 20101 . A US$1,000 investment made in 2006 cost S$1,533.6. When it
matured in 2010, the principal repayment of US$1,000 was only worth
S$1,287.5 when converted back to S$. Even though the product had delivered
protection of principal in US$, the investor nonetheless suffered a loss of part
of his principal in S$ terms, due to the FX risk. The total return on the
investment will need to be at least 19.12% for this particular investment to
compensate the FX loss.
The second source of FX risk relates to investment performance. If the

underlying assets are denominated in foreign currency, the investment return is
dependent on the FX rate as applied to the performance measurement.
Consider an investment denominated in Singapore dollars, but invested in USD-
denominated assets. The performance of this investment differs depending on
whether it is measured in S$ or US$.
Table 2.1: Effect Of FX On Investment Performance
FX:
S$ US$
US$1 = S$
At Issue 1,000 1.50 666.67
Investment Income 56 1.40 40.00
Rate of Return in Each Currency 5.6% 6.0%
In evaluating the return potential of a financial product, be mindful of how

the returns are measured for foreign current denominated assets.
1
Monthly Statistical Bulletin, Monetary Authority of Singapore, April 2011.
5. STRUCTURAL RISK
5.1 Safety Of Principal
Given the trade-offs in risk and return, products are structured to provide
different degrees of principal protection versus capital appreciation. Each
product is structured to provide full, partial or no return of principal upon
maturity. Investors should understand the design of the product to
evaluate their tolerance for possible loss of principal.
However, there is no guarantee that the intended protection will

materialise. As discussed above, the credit risk of the protection-provider
affects the reliability of the protection given. Another reminder is that
structured deposits are considered investment products and NOT subject
to the protection of Deposit Insurance Scheme in Singapore.
5.2 Leverage
“Leverage” (also called “gearing”) refers to techniques used to increase

the potential rate of return. Such techniques include trading on margin,
use of derivatives to trade on price differentials, and borrowing money to
trade. Keep in mind that it works both ways. While “leverage” multiplies
gains, it also magnifies losses.
Most derivative contracts are leveraged, or geared, by design. (See

illustration below.) Consequently, a structured product is leveraged if it
uses leveraged derivatives. The price volatility of leveraged products can
be significantly greater than direct investments. Some leveraged
transactions may result in losses in excess of the amount invested, as is
the case in futures contracts.
Futures contracts are traded on margin, i.e. investors need to put up only
a fraction of the value of the contract to enjoy the full price appreciation,
or sustain the full decline in price. Trading on margin is akin to securities
financing, where the investor is essentially borrowing from the broker.
Interest is charged on margin accounts, which affects the total
investment returns. (See Chapter 3 for further explanation of how margin
accounts work.)
Illustration Of The Effect Of Leverage
Consider an option to buy ABC Company’s shares. The intrinsic value of

the option is the difference between the spot price and the exercise price.
If the shares are currently trading at S$15, an option to buy it at S$10

has an intrinsic value of S$5. Let’s examine what happens in the three
scenarios as illustrated in the Table below.
Table 2.2: Effect Of Leveraging
Spot Exercise Intrinsic % Change

Scenario Price Price Value From Base
(S$) (S$) (S$) Case
Base Case: At
15 10 5 --
Issue
Scenario 1: Stock
18 10 8 +60
Price rises 20%
Scenario 2: Stock
12 10 2 -60
Price falls 20%
Scenario 3: Stock
Price falls below 9 10 0 -100
Exercise Price
A 20% fluctuation in the underlying share price results in 60% change in

the intrinsic value of the option. This is the leveraging (or gearing) effect
of a derivative product.
When the share price falls below the exercise price (out-of-the-money),
the option has no value, even though the shares still have value. This is
why derivatives are riskier than direct investments.
NOTE: The actual price of the option is the intrinsic value plus time value.
Time value is ignored for illustrative purposes here.
5.3 Investment In Derivatives
Besides leverage, there are other features in derivatives contracts that

investors should consider. For example, the kick-in and knock-out
features as discussed in Chapter 1 expose the investors to potentially
unlimited downside risks.
5.4 Investment Concentration
To put it simply, this is the risk of putting all eggs in one basket. The
solution to concentration risk is diversification.
Unfortunately, diversification is not easy for an individual investor on his

own. It takes substantial resources to research and screen the universe
of stocks to diversify one’s equity portfolio, for example. For this reason,
the typical advice is for individual investors to invest in diversified unit
trusts.
Diversification is not just within an asset class, but across asset classes
via asset allocation, namely a mix of cash, equities, fixed income, and
risk-tolerance permitting, alternative investments such as derivatives,
commodities and structured products.
Too much of a good thing may not be good in the long run. If all risks are
diversified away, leaving no risk in the portfolio, the potential return is
probably also completely depleted. The art of investment is not in taking
no risk (which gives no return or achieves the risk free rate at best), but
to manage the risk to within an acceptable level.
5.5 Collateral
Requiring collateral is a common method in managing counterparty risk.

Note that having collaterals does not fully eliminate the risk. While
collaterals reduce counterparty risk, they introduce another risk factor –
the collateral risk.
Collateral risk refers to the risk that the value of collateral may not be
sufficient when collateral is exercised to cover the loss. This could
happen for two reasons. Firstly, the exposure may not have been fully
collateralised in the first place. Secondly, the value of collateral could
have deteriorated since it was pledged. Either way, having collaterals
does not fully eliminate the risk exposure.
The way to manage collateral risk is to set adequate level of collateral

required, and to require additional collateral when its value has
depreciated. Since most structured products are OTC non-standard
contracts, the level of collateral is subject to private negotiations.
6. OTHER RISKS
6.1 Legal And Regulatory
Legal risk refers to the potential loss arising from the uncertainty of legal
proceedings, such as bankruptcy, and potential legal proceedings. One
close to home example is the Lehman Brothers Minibonds, where
investors were exposed to uncertainties resulting from Lehman’s
bankruptcy.
Another source of legal risk is the regulatory risk, i.e. that legislation or
regulations may change during the life of the financial contract. The
regulatory regime for selling structured products is an example.
6.2 Correlation
Correlation is a statistical measurement of how the prices of two

securities move in relation to each other. Correlation is represented by a
correlation coefficient, which ranges from –1 to +1. A coefficient of +1
indicates that the two securities are perfectly correlated. That is, when
the price of one security moves up or down, the price of the other
security moves in the same direction, by the same percentage.
A coefficient of –1 indicates that the two securities are perfectly

negatively correlated. When the price of one security moves up or down,
the price of the other security moves in the opposite direction, by the
same percentage.
If the correlation is 0, the movements of the securities have no

correlation; they are completely random.
In real life, perfectly correlated securities are rare. Even within the same
industry, prices of individual securities are correlated in some degree, as
they are subject to similar business risk factors, but they do not move up
and down in perfect harmony.
Negatively correlated securities may enhance portfolio diversification, as

the price movements go to the opposite directions, offsetting the
downside risk with the upside price movements.
6.3 Modelling
Advent of technology has led to the emergence of automated trading,

also known as algorithmic trading, or algo trading. It is the use of pre-
programmed algorithm to decide on the timing, price, or quantity of the
trade orders. In many cases, the computer initiates the order without
human intervention.
The same technology has enabled fund managers to implement their

quantitative strategies through computer-aided analysis in identifying
profit opportunities arising from subtle anomalies, affecting the prices of
various securities. These fund managers use computer models (either
built in-house or bought from third parties) to optimise their investment
portfolios, based on system-identified profit opportunities, risk factors,
and associated transaction costs.
While the computer modelling approach to quantitative strategy greatly

improves the speed and efficiency of portfolio management, it is not
without perils. The automated programmed trading was one of the
factors causing the Flash Crash2 in the US on 6 May 2010. There is also
the risk that the models may not be robust enough to cater to evolving
market conditions. Technology does not fully displace the need for fund
managers to conduct research, analyse market trends and exercise
judgement calls on their own. Fund managers who use modelling need to
have the skills to construct the “right” models.
6.4 Early Redemption
Most structured products have fixed maturity dates. However,

redemption before maturity is possible under certain circumstances.
Early redemption may be initiated by investors who wish to cash out early
to meet unplanned financial needs. Investor-initiated early redemption
may not be allowed according to the contract terms. Or, if allowed, it is
subject to the market value adjustment. Depending on the market
conditions, investors may suffer substantial losses upon early redemption.
Early redemption may also be triggered by the issuer or due to the design
of the underlying assets. For example, some structured products are
invested in securities that contain early termination features, such as
callable bonds, or kick-in, knock-out options. Such products may be
redeemed when the bonds are called, or when the kick-in / knock-out
levels are breached. Or, some structured products contain covenants that
allow for early termination should the size of the structured products
becomes too small. Upon early termination of the underlying assets, the
structured product may suffer losses.
6.5 Examples Of Redemption Amount
Redemption amounts may be adversely affected when certain key risks

are triggered, as illustrated by Table 2.3. Do keep in mind that the table
is not an exhaustive list of risks, and that there may be transaction or
unwinding costs associated with early or mandatory redemption, which
may further exacerbate the adversely impact the redemption amount. In
the examples in Table 2.3, the underlying funds are structured notes.
2
On 6 May 2010, the Dow Jones Industrial Averaged plunged 900 points within a few minutes. US
regulators SEC and CFTC issued a joint investigative report on the incidence in September 2010. The
joint report detailed how a large mutual fund firm selling an unusually large number of E-Mini S&P
500 contracts first exhausted available buyers, and then how high-frequency traders started
aggressively selling, accelerating the effect of the mutual fund's selling, and contributing to the sharp
price declines that day.
Table 2.3: Examples Of Key Risk That Affect Redemption Amount
Key Risk What This means What Redemption

Happens Amount
Credit risk The issuer’s inability to meet a This triggers The investor
of the issuer payment due will constitute an an early (or may lose all or
event of default. mandatory) a substantial
redemption part of his
of the original
notes. investment
amount.
Derivative Derivative counterparty becomes This triggers The investor

counterparty unable to make payments due an early (or may lose all or
defaulting under the derivative transaction mandatory) a substantial
(which may be a swap or an redemption part of his
option), e.g. if it is insolvent or of the original
becomes bankrupt. notes. investment
amount.
If the derivative counterparty
defaults, the issuer will not
receive any payments under the
derivative transaction and may
not be able to meet its payment
obligations under the notes.
Certain The assets constituting the This triggers The investor

events collateral may suffer a loss in an early (or may lose all or
adversely market value, thereby leading to mandatory) a substantial
affecting a loss in the market value of the redemption part of his
the value or collateral as a whole. of the original
performance notes. investment
of the The issuer of the collateral (e.g. amount.
collateral bonds) becomes insolvent or
defaults on any of its payment
obligations.
3. Understanding Derivatives
Chapter
3 UNDERSTANDING DERIVATIVES
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. What Are Derivatives?
2. Futures And Forwards
3. Options And Warrants
4. Swaps
5. Contract For Differences (CFD)
KEY LEARNING POINTS

know what derivatives are
understand and explain the following derivatives:
- futures and forwards
- options and warrants
- swaps
- Contract For Differences (CFD)
1. WHAT ARE DERIVATIVES?
A derivative contract is a delayed delivery agreement in which its value is

dependent upon or derived from other underlying assets. The holder of a
derivative contract does not own the underlying assets. Using home purchase
as an analogy, an option to buy a flat is a derivative contract. You pay a
fraction of the price of the flat for the right to buy that flat. However, you do
not own the flat until years later when you pay the balance of the purchase
price.
The underlying assets (simply called “underlying” sometimes) of a derivative

contract can be anything:
weather (such as the number of days in a month that temperature is above
or below a certain level);
farm and agricultural outputs (such as soy bean, corn, pork belly);
metals (such as gold, aluminium, palladium);
energy (such as oil and gas); and
financials - both physical (such as equity, bond, currency) and intangible
(such as equity index, bond index, interest rates).
Derivatives are useful hedging tools for commodities producers and consumers.
For example, oil producers and airlines (aircraft consumes jet fuel) may use
futures and forward contracts to ensure stability of their revenue and expenses,
respectively.
For speculators, derivative contracts are often used as directional bets of the
price movement of the underlying. For example, if an investor anticipates the
price of a particular stock to go up within a certain time frame, instead of direct
investment in that stock, he can purchase an option on that stock. Since the
price of the option is just a fraction of the cost of the stock, the potential gain
from the option is multiple times than that from the direct investment, if his
“bet” is proven right.
Derivatives can be used as risk management tools. For example, a corporation

that is planning to issue bonds can use interest rate futures to control its
exposure to the interest rate risk, before the bonds are issued.
Similarly, a pension fund with a diversified holding in the stock market faces
considerable risk from general fluctuation of the stock prices. The fund
manager can use options on a stock index to reduce or virtually eliminate the
risk exposure.
Derivative contracts are integral parts of structured products. An understanding

of derivatives – different types, how they work and the associated risks – will
be an important foundation to understanding structured products.
1.1 Practical Example Of Derivative
Stocks and bonds are financial assets. When you invest in a financial
asset, such as a stock in XYZ Company that is currently priced at S$10,
you receive a certificate stating that you have a legal claim on the
earnings (in the form of dividends) and assets (upon liquidation) of XYZ,
the issuer. If the company does well, and its share price rises to S$15,
you can sell your share in the open market for a capital gain of S$5.
In contrast, a financial derivative asset (or just derivative) is a financial

asset in that you receive a contract stating a legal claim, except that the
value of the derivative is based on the performance of an underlying
financial asset that you do not own yet.
Example
Imagine that you dream to own a share of Warren Buffet’s Berkshire

Hathaway Inc priced at US$108,850. If you are fortunate enough to
have this large amount of money, you can pay up right away and own a
share. Suppose you do not have this amount of money, and your
roommate is willing to sell you the right to buy the share at US$75,000.
For this right, your roommate charges you a fee of US$37,500, and this
right lasts three months. In effect, your roommate has sold you a
derivative contract in the form of an option.
If you buy the option, the value of your investment now depends on the
underlying asset – the share price of Berkshire Hathaway, even though
you do not own any Berkshire Hathaway shares. If the price of Berkshire
Hathaway goes up, so does the value your option. The reverse is true as
well. If the price of Berkshire Hathaway goes down, your option falls in
value as well.
At the end of three months, if the Berkshire share price falls below
US$75,000, you are unlikely to exercise your right to buy it from your
roommate, because you can buy it cheaper in the market. In this case,
your loss is the US$37,500 which you have paid for the option, a
100% loss.
However, suppose that the Berkshire share price has risen to

US$120,000 at the end of three months, you will be wise to exercise
your option. Your roommate will be obligated to sell the share to you at
US$75,000, regardless of the prevailing market price. If he does not
own a Berkshire share, he must buy it from the open market and then
sell it to you at the agreed price. The total price that you pay to own the
Berkshire share is US$112,500 (US$37,500 option fee plus US$75,000
exercise price) for the share that is worth US$120,000.
If you exercise the option and then sell the share, you make a profit of
US$7,500 (before transaction cost) on the US$37,500 investment that
you made, a 20% return. In contrast, your profit would have been
US$11,150 had you invested US$108,850 directly in the Berkshire
share, a 10.24% return. The reason for the higher rate of return by
taking up the option from your roommate is due to the leverage effect
typically inherent in derivative instruments.
This simple arrangement between you and your roommate is just one of
the many ways that derivatives can be constructed. There are two
particularly important types of derivatives, options and futures. Many
other types exist, but they can usually be created from these two basic
building blocks, possibly by combining them with all sorts of other
investment assets including stocks and bonds, stock indices, gold and
commodities such as wheat and corn.
In this chapter, we will discuss four types of derivatives contracts,

namely;
Futures and Forwards;
Options and Warrants;
Swaps; and
Contract for Differences.
2. FUTURES AND FORWARDS
Futures and forwards are contracts giving the obligation to buy (a “call”
contract) or sell (a “put“ contract) the underlying assets:
in specified quantity;
at a specified price (the “delivery price” or “future price”); and
on a specified future date (the “delivery date” or “settlement date”).
The contract specifies one or both of two ways to fulfil the contractual
obligations. If both delivery options are provided in the contract, the buyer
gives the final instructions on the desired delivery option immediately before
the delivery date:
(a) Physical delivery – The underlying assets are delivered by the seller to the
specified delivery location as specified in the contract.
(b) Cash settlement – Cash is exchanged to settle the profits and losses
related to the contract. This is the only settlement method available when
the underlying is intangible, such as interest rate or stock index, where
physical delivery is not possible.
Only 2% to 5% of the contracts are settled through physical delivery. Most

contracts are settled either in cash, or by entering into offsetting contracts.
Futures and forwards operate in the same way, but have main differences as
shown in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1: Main Differences Between Futures And Forwards
Futures Forwards
Standardised contracts traded Non-standardised contracts traded
on exchanges. over the counter (OTC) between two
parties.
Subject to margin requirements Not subject to margin requirements.
(See section below).
There are partial settlements of Settlement of gains / losses only
emerging gains / losses through occurs on delivery date.
daily mark-to-market1 process.
However, since forward contracts are
non-standard, features such as mark-to-
market and daily margining may be
negotiated into specific contracts.
2.1 Pricing Of Forward Contracts
In principle, the forward price for a contract is determined by taking the

spot or cash price at the time of the transaction and adding to it a “cost
of carry”.
Depending on the underlying asset, the cost of carry takes into account
payments and receipts for matters such as storage, insurance, transport
costs, interest payments, dividend receipts, etc.
forward price = spot or cash price + cost of carry
The difference between the spot and the forward price is often referred to
as the premium or discount. That is, the cost of carry is referred to as a
premium when it is positive; is referred to as a discount when it is
negative.
Example
Suppose John owns a house that is valued at S$100,000, and that Mary
enters into a forward contract to buy the house one year from today.
However, since John knows that he can get the S$100,000 only in a
years’ time, he wants to be compensated for the delayed sale. Suppose
that the risk free rate of return R (the bank rate) for one year is 2%. So, if
John sells the house now for S$100,000 and puts the money in the
bank, he will get S$102,000. So John will want at least S$102,000 one
year from now for the contract to be worthwhile for him. However, Mary
knows that the house will fetch S$6,000 a year if it is rented out, and
that John has currently rented the property out. So Mary wants to be
1
Mark–to–market is the daily process of revaluing outstanding positions to the daily settlement price at
the end of each trading day. The resulting amount of profit and loss will be added to or subtracted
from the margin account.
compensated for the rental income, and she is willing to pay S$102,000 -
S$6,000 = S$96,000. This will be the forward price for the house
today.
2.2 Practical Examples Of Forward Contracts
We look at two practical examples of forward transactions in the energy

and commodity markets.
(a) Energy
In the energy markets, forward markets have developed around
benchmark crude oils, such as North Sea Brent Blend (15-day Brent)
and West Texas Intermediate (WTI). In many of these forward
contracts, cash settlement is preferred rather than physical delivery.
The Brent 15-day market is the largest and most important crude oil
forward market in the world. The Brent forward contract gives 15
days notice to the buyer to take delivery of a cargo at Sullom Voe
during a notional three-day loading period. The terms are either
accepted or passed to another buyer who can repeat the process
forming a “chain”. This whole process is known as a book-out.
The majority of trades use a book-out process which means that the
contracts are cleared by the buyers and sellers in a series of trades to
cancel mutual contracts by cash settlement.
(b) Commodities
Forward contracts for commodities, such as wheat, corn and
soybeans are similar in principle with energy and metals, although the
details may differ. Commodity terms usually include terms CIF and
FOB. These terms indicate the types of delivery for different
contracts.
The term CIF means Cost-Insurance-Freight. A CIF contract means

that the total cost of the contract including delivery is known. FOB
means Free-On-Board, where the buyer has to arrange and pay for
transportation costs which must, therefore, be added to the quote
price.
2.3 Summary Of Forward Contracts
The major advantage of a forward contract is that it fixes prices for a

future date. The major disadvantage of a forward contract is that if spot
prices move one way or the other at the settlement date, then there is no
way out of the agreement for the counterparties. Both sides are subject
to the potential of gains or losses which are binding.
2.4 History Of Futures Contracts
Futures contracts address one of the key disadvantages of forward

contracts. With a futures contract, it is possible for market players to
both fix the forward price of an asset and combine it with the opportunity
to take advantage of any future price volatility.
The disadvantages posed by early forward contracts led to the

introduction of futures contracts in the mid-1860s. In 1865, the Chicago
Board of Trade (CBOT) laid the foundation to all modern futures contracts
by introducing grain agreements which standardised the following:
the quality of the grain;
the quantity of grain for the contract; and
the date and the location for the delivery of the grain.
In effect the only condition left for the contract was the price. This was
open to negotiation by both sides, but was carried out on the floor of the
exchange using open outcry. This meant that the prices agreed were
available and transparent to all traders.
Originally, futures were traded only on commodities, in a market

dominated by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). However, after
their introduction in the 1970s, contracts on financial instruments
became hugely successful and quickly overtook commodities futures in
terms of trading volume and global accessibility to the markets. This led
to the introduction of many new futures exchanges across the world,
such as LIFFE, EUREX and TIFFE.
There are two basic types of assets for which futures contracts exist.
These are:
commodity futures contracts; and
financial futures contracts.
Table 3.2: Examples Of Commodity And Financial Futures
Commodity Futures Financial Futures

Metals – base, precious Interest rates
Grains and oilseeds – grain, livestock,
Bond prices
oilseeds, fibres
Softs – coffee, cocoa, sugar Currency exchange rates
Energy – crude oil, gas, oil products Equity stock indices
2.5 Pricing Of Futures Contracts
For most commodities, the futures price is usually higher than the current
spot price. This is because there are costs associated with storage,
freight and insurance, which will have to be covered for the futures
delivery. When the futures price is higher than the spot price, the
situation is known as contango.
If a chart is drawn of spot and futures prices, then, as the futures expiry
date approaches, the plots will converge. This is because the costs
diminish over time and become zero at the delivery date. Figure 3.1
shows a contango chart for a three-month futures contract.
Figure 3.1: The Convergence Of Futures And Spot Price
Futures
Futures
Price
price
Spot
Spot
price
Price
One
One- Two
Two- Three
Three-
month months months
Month Month Month
s s
When the futures price is lower than the spot price, the market is said to
be in backwardation. Backwardation occurs in times of temporary
shortage caused by strikes and under-capacity.
Another frequently used terminology in trading futures contracts is basis.

Basis is the difference between the spot price and the future price.
Example
Suppose the June futures price for corn is S$2.60 per bushel, and the
cash price in Farmerville USA is S$2.20. The basis is -S$0.40 (i.e.
S$2.20 - S$2.60). In market lingo, the basis is “40 cents under June”.
If the basis has been a positive 40 cents, then it is said to be “40 cents
over June”.
2.6 Margin (Futures Contracts)
Futures are traded on margin. The initial cash outlay (called “initial
margin”) is a fraction of the full value of the contract. The level of initial
margin is set by the exchange on which the contracts are traded, based
on the anticipated price volatility. The broker may add additional margin
requirement for specific clients, products or markets based on risk
analysis. The ability to trade at a fraction of the value of the contract
creates the leverage effect of futures trading.
A futures contract is marked to market on a daily basis. The broker issues

a “margin call” when the initial margin is eroded by losses. The additional
amount required to restore the account to the initial margin is called
“variation margin”.
To reduce the frequency of margin calls, brokers make margin calls only
when the account is below a “maintenance margin” level. Nonetheless,
the variation margin is always the amount required to restore the margin
account to the initial margin level.
If the margin calls are not met, the broker has the right to liquidate
positions to raise the necessary amount.
Example: Gold Futures
Initial margin: S$2,500

Maintenance margin: S$2,000
An investor buying a gold contract will need to deposit S$2,500 as

initial margin with the broker.
If the value of the contract drops by S$1,000, the loss is offset against
the margin account, bringing it down to S$1,500 which is below the
maintenance margin.
The broker will issue a margin call, requesting a S$1,000 top-up to

restore the account balance to the initial margin level of S$2,500.
If the value of the contract drops by another S$300, the margin account
is reduced to S$2,200. Since this is above the maintenance margin
level, no margin call is made, even though it is below the initial margin.
2.7 Market Participants
There are two main types of market participants – hedgers and

speculators. We look briefly at what they do and why. The table below
summarises our discussion.
Table 3.3: Main Market Participants
Who Reason For Buying Reason For Selling

Hedgers To lock in a price and To lock in a price and obtain
obtain protection from protection from falling
rising prices. prices.
To profit from rising
Speculators To profit from falling prices.
prices.
(a) Hedgers
Hedgers are typically producers and consumers of the commodity.
Examples are: rubber plantations and tire companies that use rubber
to make tires; jet fuel refineries and airlines that use jet fuel; sugar
cane growers and cane sugar manufacturers.
The hedger buys or sells in the futures market today, to establish a

known price for something that they intend to buy or sell later in the
cash market. Buyers are thus able to protect themselves against
higher prices, and sellers are able to hedge against lower prices.
Whatever the hedging strategy, hedgers are willing to give up the
opportunity to benefit from favourable price changes, in order to
achieve protection against unfavourable price changes.
Consider this example. A tyre manufacturer will need to buy

additional rubber from its supplier in six months, to produce tyres
that it is already offering in its catalogues at a known price today. An
increase in the cost of rubber can reduce or wipe out any profit
margin. To minimise this risk, the manufacturer buys futures
contracts for the delivery of rubber in six months at S$500 a tonne.
If, six months later, the cash market price of rubber has risen to
S$550. The manufacturer now has two choices. It may choose to
settle its rubber contract for a S$50 a tonne profit, and use that to
offset the S$550 that it has to pay to its supplier to acquire rubber.
Alternatively, it may choose to take physical delivery of rubber at
S$500 a tonne. In reality, most commodities futures are settled in
cash, although physical delivery is almost always an option under the
contract.
The hedge, in affect, provided protection against an increase in the

cost of rubber. It locked in a cost of S$500, regardless of what
happens in the cash market price. Had the price of rubber declined,
the hedger would have incurred a loss on the futures position, but
this would have been offset by the lower cost of acquiring rubber in
the cash market.
The number and variety of hedging possibilities is practically limitless.

A corporate treasurer who will need to borrow money at some future
date can hedge against the possibility of rising interest rates. An
investor can use stock index futures to hedge against an overall
increase in stock prices, if he anticipates buying stocks at some
future time. A coffee grower can hedge against lower coffee prices,
and a coffee retail store (like Starbucks or Coffee Bean) can hedge
against higher coffee prices.
(b) Speculators
Speculators are investors who buy to profit from a price increase or
sell to profit from a price decrease. Speculators put their money at
risk in the hope of profiting from an anticipated price change.
Speculators serve an important role of providing market liquidity.

Hedgers’ interest is to maintain price stability, while speculators seek
to benefit from price volatility and trade constantly to aim to buy-low
and sell-high. Without speculators, the market liquidity tends to be
low. A vibrant trading market requires the participation from both
hedgers and speculators.
2.8 Futures Trading Strategies
Futures contracts can be used for hedging or for speculation. In this

section, focus is on financial futures.
(a) Speculating With Futures

In March, you expect the Taiwan stock market to rise strongly over
the next three months. You buy an MSCI Taiwan June futures
contract at 220 index points. Now suppose that your belief turns out
to be correct and, at contract maturity, the index has risen to 242.
Based on a multiplier of US$100 per index point, your payoff is
US$2,200:
Initial cash outlay = 220 x US$100 per point

= US$22,000
MSCI Taiwan Stock Index close = 242
MSCI Taiwan futures price = 220
Index points difference = 22 points
Payoff = 22 x US$100 per point
= US$2,200
Now if you got things wrong and the market went down instead to
200, your loss would be US$2,0002:
MSCI Taiwan Stock Index close = 200

MSCI Taiwan futures price = 220
Index points difference = -20 points
Payoff = -20 x US$100 per point
= -US$2,000
Speculating in futures can bring huge rewards, as well as losses.

While your upside is unlimited, neither is your downside. If the stock
index in our above example has dipped to 150, 100 or even 50, the
losses can be huge.
(b) Short Hedging With Futures

A short hedge means to go into a short position to protect an existing
portfolio of stocks. Consider a fund manager who manages and owns
a small diversified portfolio of Singapore stocks that closely tracks
the Straits Times Index (STI). He expects a near-term market decline,
but does not wish to liquidate his position. He can hedge his portfolio
by selling STI futures. In case the market falls, any losses on his
portfolio holdings will be partially offset by the gains from the short
futures position. If the market rises, he loses from the futures
position, but gains from the rise in the portfolio’s value. The gains
and losses hopefully will cancel out, and the fund manager‘s position
will not be adversely affected.
2
Recall that with stock index options, your loss is limited to the call premium and no more, but not
with futures. A long position in futures has very high downside risk, while a long call’s downside is
limited to the call premium paid.
A fundamental problem exists in that there is no futures contract that

exactly matches his or any particular stock portfolio. By using a
futures contract to protect his portfolio, he is cross-hedging - the
underlying stock index is related, but not identical to his stock
position.
One other consideration is that the volatility of the portfolio may not
perfectly match that of the market index. This is a fundamental
problem because no market index can exactly match any stock
portfolio. For example, the market may fall 10 percent, but his
portfolio may fall by 15 percent or something else. The sensitivity of
a portfolio’s price movement to the market’s price movement can be
summed up in a number called the portfolio beta. For example, a
portfolio beta of 1.2 means that that every 1 percent rise in the STI
brought about a 1.2 percent increase in his portfolio holdings. The
reverse is also true if the STI goes down.
Example
Suppose the fund manager’s Singapore portfolio is currently worth

S$1,000,000, and it has a portfolio beta of 1.2 to the STI. It is now
January and he is concerned about a market decline over the next
two months. The STI is currently at 1,850 and the March STI
futures contract is priced at 1,800. With a multiplier of S$10 per
point, the price coverage per contract (this represents the value of
portfolio that may be covered / compensated under each contract of
the future contract) of one March contract is:
Price coverage per contract= 1,800 x S$10

= S$18,000
To protect the portfolio against a market decline, the manager

calculates the hedge ratio, which is the number of futures contracts
to sell:
value of portfolio
Hedge ratio= x portfolio beta
price coverage per contract
S$1,000,000
= x 1.2
S$18,000
= 66.7 or 67 contracts
Contracts are not divisible, so our fund manager rounds up and sells
67 STI futures contracts.
By hedging, the fund manager has greatly reduced, or may even have
eliminated the possibility of a loss from a decline in the price of his
Singapore portfolio. However, he has also eliminated the possibility of
a gain from a price increase. This is an important point. If the STI
rises, he will have a loss on his short futures position, offsetting the
gain on his Singapore portfolio. Or if the STI falls, he will have a gain
on his short futures position, offsetting the loss on his Singapore
portfolio.
(c) Long Hedging With Stock Index Futures

Imagine another fund manager who is starting up a new Singapore
fund. The fund does not own any stocks yet, but he will need to
acquire them in the future. He is bullish about the market and
expects the stocks to increase in value very soon. The problem is
that he does not have the cash to buy into the market right away.
With stock index futures, he can buy futures contracts at a much
lower cash outlay (due to leverage, which we discussed in Chapter
2), and lock in today’s prices to take advantage of the rise in prices if
it does occur.
3. OPTIONS AND WARRANTS3
Options and warrants are similar. Both give the right to buy (“call” contract) or
sell (“put” contract) the underlying security:
in specified quantity;
at a specified price (called the “exercise price”, or “strike price”); and
on or before a specified date (called the “expiry date”).
Options and warrants grant the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell the
underlying. The holder of the warrant or option may choose whether or not he
exercises the contractual rights. Indeed, many investors choose not to exercise
the rights when contracts are out-of-the-money, and simply let the contracts
expire. On the other hand, the holder of a futures / forward contract must fulfil
the contract terms on the settlement date.
A European style option / warrant is a contract that may only be exercised on

expiration. An American style option / warrant is a contract that may be
exercised on any trading day on or before the expiry date.
Both warrants and options may be traded on an exchange or a traded OTC.

Options are typically settled through physical delivery, except when the
underlying asset is intangible, such as an index. Exchange-traded warrants are
settled in cash.
Options and warrants have no value after the expiry date, because the right to
buy / sell no longer exists.
3
There are two types of warrants: structured warrants and company warrants. Only structured
warrants are used in structured products and, therefore, the discussion here confines to structured
warrants. For reader’s background information, company warrants are issued by a company in
conjunction with bond, rights issue, or loan stocks. Warrants issued in this way act as a sweetener to
make the bond, rights issue or loan stocks more attractive. Structured warrants (sometimes called
covered warrants) are issued by a third-party, usually an investment bank, unrelated to the issuer of
the underlying securities.
An option or warrant is said to be in-the-money, at-the-money, or out-of-the-

money, depending on the spot price of the underlying asset relative to the
strike price. A call option / warrant is in-the-money, when the strike price is
below the market price of the underlying. That is, the call option / warrant still
has intrinsic value as illustrated in the following:
Call Put Intrinsic

(Right to Buy) (Right to Sell) Value
Strike price is less Strike price is more Positive
“in-the- money”
than market price. than market price. value
Strike price is equal Strike price is equal
“at-the money” No value
to market price. to market price.
“out-of-the Strike price is more Strike price is less
No value
money” than market price. than market price.
3.1 Risk Profile Of Option / Warrant
The shape of the risk-return profile of structured products comes from the
hockey-stick shape of the risk profiles of options and warrants.
A holder of a call option or warrant has a bullish view of the market. If

the market turns bearish instead, the value of the call option / warrant
starts to decline. When the option / warrant is at-the-money or out-of-the-
money (i.e. at or below the strike price for the call), the option / warrant
has no value, and the investor loses the entire premium paid to the
option.
Figure 3.2: Risk Profile Of A Call Option / Warrant
Profit
Strike Price
Price of Underlying
Asset
Maximum
loss
Loss
A put option / warrant works the other way. As the price of the
underlying asset rises contrary to the investor’s bearish outlook, the value
of the put option or warrant starts to decline and reaches the maximum
loss level at the strike price.
Figure 3.3: Risk Profile Of A Put Option / Warrant
Profit
Strike Price
Price of Underlying
Asset
Maximum Loss
Loss
3.2 Plain Vanilla Versus Exotic Option
“Plain vanilla option” refers to option with predetermined underlying

assets, a stated strike price, a known expiry date, without special
conditions on any of the option parameters. The value of option is based
on a number of factors as follows:
current spot price of the underlying asset;
exercise price;
time until expiry;
interest rate;
volatility of the underlying; and
dividend rate on the underlying.
The value of option is determined by complex pricing models. However,

the market price of the option is influenced by the forces of market
supply and demand. The market price of option may deviate from its
intrinsic value from time to time.
“Exotic option”, by contrast, has conditions on any of its parameters. For

example, the payoff under an Asian option is based on the average price
of the underlying assets over a preset period. Needless to say, the exotic
options have an additional layer of complexity to their pricing.
Below is a list of more common exotic options.

Asian option (or average price option): The payoff is determined by the
average price of the underlying assets over a preset period of time.
This is in contrast to the usual European option or American option,
where the payoff of the option depends on the price of the underlying
asset at maturity.
Forward-start option: The option only comes into effect at a future
date. It is essentially a forward on an option, except that the premium
is paid today. It is often used in executive compensation.
Compound option: This is an option on an option. As settlement is at
expiry, the option-holder receives another option.
Chooser option: Under this option, the investor chooses whether the
option will become a call or a put by a specified choice date.
Barrier option: This is the option used in the barrier certificates. Under
this option, the option to exercise depends on the underlying assets
crossing or reaching a given barrier level. There are four combinations
of this type of options as follows:
– Up-and-out: Spot price starts below the barrier level and has to
move up and reaches the barrier level for the option to be knocked-
out (i.e. becomes null and void);
– Down-and-out: Spot price starts above the barrier level and has to
move down and reaches the barrier level for the option to be
knocked-out;
– Up-and-in: Spot price starts below the barrier level and has to move
up and reaches the barrier level for the option to become activated;
and
– Down-and-in: Spot price starts above the barrier level and has to
move down and reaches the barrier level for the option to become
activated.
Binary option: This option pays off either nothing or a predetermined
amount. The cash-or-nothing binary option pays some fixed amount of
cash if the option expires in-the-money, while the asset-or-nothing
pays the value of the underlying asset.
Rainbow option: There are two or more risky underlying assets
associated with this type of options. The name comes from the
analogy that the risky assets are like the colours in the rainbow. The
payoff of rainbow options depends on the best or the worst of the
risky assets. For example, best of x number of risky assets, or the
worst of, or the maximum of, or the minimum of.
Swaption: This is an option giving the right to enter into an underlying
swap agreement. The term "swaption" typically refers to options on
interest rate swaps, although any type of swaps can be used.
3.3 Basic Option Trading Strategies
Options are appealing because they can be combined to offer investors a

wide variety of investment strategies. In fact, there is essentially no limit
to the number of different investment strategies available using options.
Fortunately, only a small number of basic option positions are available
and more complicated strategies are all built from these.
In this section, we learn how options work by looking at how to profit

and lose from them. To keep things simple, we assume each contract is
European style and lasts three months. We start by looking at basic call
and put positions followed by combining puts, calls, cash and shares of
stock.
Strategies can be categorised as bullish, bearish or neutral. We can

determine whether a strategy is bullish or bearish just by asking: “Is
money made on the rise or fall of the stock price?” If money is made
when stock price rises, then it is a bullish position. If money is made
when stock price falls, it is a bearish position. If money is made when
stock prices rises, as well as when it falls, it is probably a neutral
strategy.
3.4 Bullish Option Strategies
We now discuss four basic bullish strategies as follows:

Long calls;
Covered calls;
Protective puts; and
Selling naked puts.
(a) Long Calls

Buying calls appeals to aggressive investors because of leverage.
Suppose Michael has a strong feeling that a particular stock is about
to move higher. If he purchases the stock, his cash outlay is S$1,000
for 100 shares, and his maximum loss possible is S$1,000. If he
buys a call, he pays S$100 (100 shares X S$1 per right), and his risk
is limited to S$100. Here we see leverage working - the call is only
10% of the S$1,000 needed to purchase the stock directly.
Cash Gain when Gain when

Outlay price=S$6 price=S$14
(S$) (S$) (%) (S$) (%)
Long Stock -1,000 -400 -40 +400 +40
Long Call -100 -100 -100 +300 +300
If the stock price falls to S$6, the long stock position loses S$400 as
compared to S$100 for the buy call. Leverage is magnified when the
stock price goes up. At S$14, the long stock’s S$400 gain is 40% of
the cash outlay of S$1,000 as compared to the long call’s profit of
300%. (Refer to Figure 3.2 for the profit / risk profile.)
When one considers the combination of leverage, limited downside

and unlimited upside potential, it is easy to see that buying call
options is an attractive strategy for bullish investors.
(b) Covered Calls

A covered call is a conservative strategy where one writes (i.e. sells)
call options on stock already owned (note that we are not newly
buying stock). Suppose Michael already owns 100 stocks of XYZ
purchased at S$10 per share. He subsequently sells a call option for
S$1 with an exercise price of S$10. What is the effect of these two
transactions?

(S$) (S$) (%) (S$) (%)
Long Stock -1,000 -400 -40 +400 +40
Short Call +100 +100 +100 -300 -300
Covered Call -900 -300 -33 +100 +11
If XYZ falls to S$6, the option will expire worthless, and Michael
pockets the S$100 premium received. The S$100 helps to offset the
S$400 loss from his long position. Without selling the call option, his
loss is S$400 as compared to S$300 from the covered call position.
If the stock rises to S$14, the option will be exercised against

Michael, and he has to deliver the stock in exchange for S$10. Since
he already owns the stock, he is said to be “covered.” The net effect
of the strategy is to give up the possibility of higher profits in
exchange for the certain option premium of S$100. This decreases
the uncertainty surrounding returns and, therefore, decreases risk.
Look at the following diagram. Notice that the resulting profit pattern
from a long stock and sell call is a sell put. For instance, if the stock
price runs up to S$30 the loss from the sell call will always be offset
by the long stock position. The net result is a constant expected
profit of S$100.
Figure 3.4: Profit / Risk Profile Of A Covered Call
Profit
Long Stock
Covered Call
0
Stock Price
Short Call
Why write a covered call when a covered call cancels out unlimited
upside potential and exposes the investor to unlimited downside risk?
Investors write covered calls because they are bullish on the stock
that they own and would like to keep the stock for returns in the long
term, but they feel that the potential of the stock going up is not
promising in the near term. Thus, they use options to generate some
additional income at very little risk in the short term. There is also the
added advantage that the breakeven price is lowered, in our case to

S$9.
A covered call position can lower breakeven point:

Profit when stock price is (S$):
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Long Stock
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
at S$10
Short Call 1 1 1 1 1 0 -1 -2 -3
Covered Call -3 -2 -1 0 1 1 1 1 1
(c) Protective Puts

A protective put strategy calls for buying a put on stock that one has
already owned. Suppose Michael already owns 100 stocks of XYZ
purchased at S$10 per share. He buys a put option for S$1 with an
exercise price of S$10. What is the effect of this transaction?

(S$) (S$) (%) (S$) (%)
Long Stock -1,000 -400 -40 +400 +40
Buy Put -100 +300 +300 -100 -100
Protective Put -1,100 -100 -9 +300 +27
If XYZ falls to S$6, Michael will exercise the put option and receive a
profit of S$300 (= -100 + 400). This S$300 offsets the S$400 loss
from his long position. Without buying the put option, his loss is
S$400 as compared to a loss of S$100 from the protective put
position.
If the stock rises to S$14, Michael will let the put option expire
worthless and lose the S$100 premium. The gain from his long stock
position of S$400 produces a net S$300 in profits.
Notice from the following diagram that the resulting profit pattern
from a long stock and buy put is a buy call. The net result is
protection against downside risk and exposure to an unlimited upside.
Figure 3.5: Profit / Risk Profile Of A Protective Put
Profit
Long Stock
Protective Put
0
Stock Price
Long Put
All in all, the protective put benefits investors who are mainly bullish
about the stock, but nevertheless want downside protection. Michael
uses S$1 to eliminate the downside risk. For this reason, a strategy
of buying a put option on a stock already owned is considered a
conservative strategy.
A protective put position increases breakeven point:

Profit when stock price is (S$):
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Long Stock at
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
S$10
Buy Put 3 2 1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
Protective Put -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 1 2 3
(d) Selling Naked Puts

Selling a naked put seems unattractive at first. You get a limited
profit when the stock goes up and you are still exposed to great risk
when the stock price goes down. So why will anyone want to write
a naked put? The answer is that if you want to own the stock, selling
a naked put addresses your need and gives you a discount relative to
its current price.
Figure 3.6: Profit / Risk Profile Of A Naked Put
Profit
Premium
0
Stock Price
To illustrate this, suppose Donald wishes to own XYZ, but feels its
current price of S$11 is still too expensive. He sells a put for S$1
with an exercise price of S$10. If XYZ drops to S$8, the put buyer
will exercise his right to sell to Donald at S$10. Donald receives the
stock by paying S$10. However, his net cost is really S$9 (-10 +1),
since Donald has receive S$1 for selling the put. In the end, Donald
has paid S$9 for XYZ (which is now worth S$8), as compared to its
initial price of S$11.
However, if XYZ rises to S$14, the put buyer will not sell XYZ to
Donald at S$10, since he can sell it in the open market for S$14. If
Donald still wants to own XYZ, he will need to buy it from the
market at S$14, offset by the S$1 that he has received on the put.
He ends up paying S$13 for the share, instead of S$11.
3.5 Bearish Option Strategies
We discuss two basic bearish strategies as follows:

Long puts; and
Naked calls.
(a) Long Puts

Now imagine that Michael has a strong feeling that a particular stock
is about to move lower. Yet he is fearful of selling a stock short
because of the potential for unlimited losses. Rather than subjecting
himself to unlimited downside risk, buying a long put is a safer
strategy.
If Michael shorts the stock, his cash inflow is S$1,000 for 100
shares. If he buys a put, he will pay S$100, and his maximum risk is
limited to S$100.

(S$) (S$) (%) (S$) (%)
Short Stock 1000 400 40 -400 -40
Long Put -100 300 300 -100 -100
If stock price falls to S$6, the short stock position earns S$400, but
above the breakeven price of S$10, losses can be unlimited. At S$6,
the long put earns S$300 in profits, S$100 less than the short stock
position earns because of the S$100 put premium. However, if the
stock runs a lot higher beyond S$10, the maximum loss is capped at
S$100. (See Figure 3.3 for the profit / risk profile of a put option.)
(b) Naked Calls

Unlike covered calls, where the call seller owns the underlying stock
and can make delivery at a known price, the naked call seller is
completely exposed to downside risk when the stock price goes up.

(S$) (S$) (%) (S$) (%)
Short Call 100 100 100 -300 -300
Selling naked calls is one of the riskiest strategies of all. Not only is
the downside unlimited, the upside is limited to the premium
received.
Figure 3.7: Profit / Risk Profile Of A Naked Call
Profit
Premium
0
Stock Price
3.6 Neutral Option Strategies
When you are neutral on a stock, it means you are undecided about
whether the price is going to go up or down. We look at one of the more
common strategies called a straddle.
(a) Straddles
Suppose Steven expects a stock to have a big move, but he thinks
that the move can be in either direction. He simultaneously buys a
call and buys a put at the same strike price and expiration for S$1
each share. His total cash outlay is S$200 for a contract of 100
shares. This is called a bull straddle.
Cash Profit when Profit when Profit when

Outlay price = S$6 price = S$10 price = S$14
(S$) (S$) (%) (S$) (%) (S$) (%)
Long Call -100 -100 -100 -100 -100 300 300
Buy Put -100 300 300 -100 -100 -100 -100
Bull Straddle -200 200 100 -200 -100 200 100
If stock price falls to S$6 or it rises to S$14, the bull straddle earns
him $200. In fact, the larger the price movement, either up or down,
the bigger will be the profits. The greatest risk in this case is that the
stock remains around S$10 where both options expire worthless. His
cost and maximum loss then will be S$200.
Figure 3.8: Profit / Risk Profile Of A Bull Straddle
Bull Straddle
15
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
-5
-15
In a bear straddle, you expect the opposite in that the market will not
move much in either direction. You simultaneously sell a call and sell
a put at the same strike and expiration for S$1 each share. Your total
cash receipt is S$200 for a contract of 100 shares.
Cash Profit when Profit when

Profit when
Outlay price = price =
price = S$6
(S$) S$10 S$14
(S$) (%) (S$) (%) (S$) (%)
Short Call 100 100 100 100 100 -300 -300
Short Put 100 -300 -300 100 100 100 100
Bear Straddle 200 -200 -100 200 100 -200 -100
With a bull straddle, price volatility contributes positively to profits. It

is the opposite with a bear straddle – price volatility negatively
affects profits. If stock price falls to S$6 or it rises to S$14, the bear
straddle brings you a S$200 loss. The larger the price movement,
either up or down, the bigger will be the losses. The best situation is
for price to not move at all. The bear straddle brings you the largest
profits when the stock price is around S$10. The maximum profit is
S$200, which is the cash inflow from selling the two options.
Figure 3.9: Profit / Risk Profile Of A Bear Straddle
Bear Straddle
15
-5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
-15
3.7 Summary Of Options
The following table summarises options in terms of buyers / holders and

sellers / writers:
Buyer / Holder Seller / Writer

Buyer has the right Seller has the obligation to
Right or
to buy or sell – no buy or sell – no right to
obligation
obligation refuse
Right to buy / to go Obligation to sell / to go short
Call
long on exercise
Right to sell / to go Obligation to buy / to go long
Put
short on exercise
Premium Paid Received
Exercise Price Buyer’s decision Seller cannot influence

Max Potential
Cost of premium Unlimited
Loss
Max Potential
Unlimited Price of premium
Gain
4. SWAPS
A swap agreement is exactly what the name suggests, where two parties
agree to exchange cash flows at future dates. Nothing is bought or sold. If
the cash flows being exchanged are derived from financial instruments
owned by either party, there is no change in the ownership of these financial
instruments.
The genesis of the swap market can be traced back to the 1970s, when
foreign exchange controls made it difficult for companies in one country to
lend money to an overseas subsidiary. A parallel loan structure was
developed to circumvent the problem, whereby two companies domiciled in
different countries could lend equivalent amounts to the other’s subsidiary.
In the early days of the swap market, banks acted as brokers in return for a
fee. They identified counterparties with offsetting needs and put them
together. This was an arduous process as finding offsetting counterparties
was not straightforward. Each transaction had to be carefully customised,
and complex documentation had to be prepared to each party’s satisfaction.
As the market evolved, banks started to “warehouse” positions by taking on

one side of a transaction in the hope that an offsetting transaction may be
found later.
In this section, we discuss five types of swap instruments:

Interest Rate Swaps
Currency Swaps
Credit Default Swap (CDS)
Equity Swaps
Commodity Swaps
4.1 Interest Rate Swaps
The most common type of swap is a plain vanilla interest rate swap. It
is the exchange of the interest payments on a fixed rate loan to the
payments on a floating rate loan. Since an interest rate swap operates
in the same currency, cash flows occurring on same dates can be and
are netted.
The reason for this exchange is to benefit from comparative advantage.

Company A may have greater comparative advantage in fixed rate
markets to raise funds, while Company B may have a comparative
advantage in floating rate markets. If each wishes to exploit its relative
advantage, A may end up borrowing fixed when it wants floating, and
B borrowing floating when it wants fixed. This is where a swap
agreement can offer a solution to achieve their desired outcomes. A
swap agreement between the two companies has the effect of
transforming A’s fixed rate loan into a floating rate loan and B’s floating
loan into a fixed loan.
Example
Company A wishes to raise S$10 million. A can borrow at 0.5% above

LIBOR 4 from a bank, or a 6% fixed rate loan. Company B wishes to
raise S$20 million. B can borrow at 2% above LIBOR from a bank, or
at 6.75% fixed rate. In other words, A can borrow 1.5% cheaper than
B in the floating rate market, but only 0.75% cheaper than B in the
fixed rate market.
A prefers a fixed rate loan, but wishes to explore its comparative

advantage in floating rate loan market. On the other hand, B prefers a
floating rate loan, and wishes to bring down the borrowing cost. Both
A and B benefit from a swap agreement.
Three-step Transactions:
(1) Company A borrows a Floating Rate Loan pays LIBOR + 0.5%.
(2) Company B borrows a Fixed Rate Loan, pays 6.75% fixed.
(3) Company A and B enter into swap agreement, whereby Company
A pays 5.75% fixed interest to Company B, and receives in return
LIBOR +0.75% floating interest on a specific notional principal
amount agreeable by both parties.
4
LIBOR – London Inter-bank Offered Rate – is the interest rate at which banks can borrow funds, in
marketable size, from other banks in the London inter-bank market. The LIBOR is the world's most
widely used benchmark for short-term interest rates.
With the swap agreement, the final cost to Company A is a fixed rate
5.5% (LIBOR + 0.5% to the bank, plus 5.75% to B, offset by the
LIBOR + 0.75% received from B), a savings of 0.5% as compared to
the 6% fixed rate that it would have incurred without the swap
agreement.
The final cost to Company B is a floating rate LIBOR + 1.75% (6.75%

paid on the bond, plus LIBOR + 0.75% to A, offset by 5.75% received
from A), a savings of 0.25% as compared to LIBOR + 2% that it
would have incurred without the swap agreement.
Figure 3.10: Interest Rate Swap
Company A Company B
B receives
5.75%
A receives LIBOR
+ 0.75%
A pays LIBOR B pays 6.75%

+ 0.5%
Floating Rate Loan Fixed Rate Loan
Note that a swap agreement is based on a “notional” principal amount,

used to calculate the amount of interest payment to exchange between
A and B. In this case, the notional principal can be an amount between
S$10 million to S$20 million, agreed upon by A and B.
4.2 Currency Swaps
With an interest rate swap, cash flows occurring on same dates are
netted, only the difference in cash flows changes hand. An interest rate
swap involves only the swapping of interest payments, and not the
principal amount.
With a cross-currency swap, both the principal and interest payments

are exchanged without any netting, because the cash flows are in
different currencies, rendering netting impossible. Both principal and
interest payments are exchanged between two counterparties, at a rate

agreed now, at a specified point in the future.
Currency swaps are often used by companies that have loans

denominated in one currency, while revenues are denominated in
another currency. Hence, it is exposed to currency risk.
(a) Contrast With Futures And Forwards

The simplest currency swap structure is to exchange the principal
only with the counterparty. Such an agreement is in fact equivalent
to a futures or forward contract. A swap is more expensive than a
futures or forwards for short-term contracts, so it is rarely used.
However, principal-only currency swaps are often used as a cost-
effective way to fix forward rates for longer-term futures where the
spreads are wider.
(b) Contrast With Currency Exchange

Currency swap is based on a rate agreed now, to be exchanged in
the future. The currency exchange is for an exchange of two
currencies to take place now.
4.3 Credit Default Swap (CDS)
A CDS transfers the credit risk of a credit instrument, namely bond,

note or loan, to another party, in exchange for a series of fee
payments. It is similar to insurance because it provides the CDS buyer,
who owns the underlying credit, with protection against default, a
credit rating downgrade, or other defined "credit events".
Suppose Bank A made a 5-year loan to a borrower. Bank A now wishes

to eliminate its exposure to the borrower’s credit risk. This can be due
to a variety of reasons: to reduce its regulatory capital requirements; to
reduce concentration of risk exposure to the same borrower; or to
reduce concentration of risk exposure to similar loan portfolios.
Thus, Bank A (the protection buyer) enters into a CDS with Bank B (the
protection seller) based on the 5-year loan, and makes periodic
premium payments to Bank B. If the borrower (the reference entity)
defaults or suffers any of the predefined credit events, Bank B pays
Bank A the par value of the loan.
It is important to note that the reference entity and the underlying

credit instrument are not parties to the CDS agreement. They are
merely used as a reference point. In fact, the CDS protection buyer
need not even own the underlying credit instrument.
Figure 3.11: Credit Default Swap
Bank A Bank B
Buys protection with
periodic payments
Payment upon default
5-year Interest &

loan loan
repayment CDS: Bank A
need not own
the loan to
effect the CDS
with Bank B.
Reference Entity
4.4 Equity Swaps
As with all swap agreements, an equity swap is an exchange of cash

flows between two parties. What distinguishes it from other swaps is
that one set of cash flow is equity-based, such as from a stock or from
an equity index. The other set of cash flow is often fixed income-based
(either a fixed rate or floating rate such as LIBOR), but can also be
equity-based.
Equity swaps are used to substitute for a direct investment in stock

markets, in order to avoid transaction costs, to avoid local dividend tax,
to avoid limitations on leverage, or to get around rules governing the
particular type of investment that an institution or person can hold.
For example, let's say A wants to invest in stock X listed in Country C.

However, A is not allowed to invest in Country C due to capital control
regulations. He can, however, enter into a contract with B, who is a
resident of C, and ask B to buy the shares of company X and provide A
with the return on share X. In return, A agrees to pay B a fixed (or
floating) rate of return.
When effectively used, equity swaps can eliminate cross-border

investment barriers.
4.5 Commodity Swaps
A commodity swap is an agreement in which one set of payments is

set by the price of a commodity or by the price of a commodity index.
The most common examples of commodity swaps involve plain vanilla
OTC agreements for a fixed-for-floating exchange of risk in which no
delivery of the physical commodity is involved.
Commodity swaps are used by many consumers and producers of

commodities to hedge price rises over a long-term period. For example,
bread makers hedge grain prices, while shipping companies hedge fuel
prices.
Example
Cost-Cutter Airlines (CCA) wishes to fix or set ticket prices for up to a

year forward being used to help to predict its future revenue. Suppose
fuel prices represent 30% of CCA’s operating costs, so any price
fluctuations can seriously affect its profits if ticket prices are fixed.
How can CCA eliminate or reduce this floating price risk besides
imposing fuel surcharges?
There are a number of derivatives that CCA can use to hedge its risk
such as futures and options. However, an energy swap is the most
likely instrument as it provides a flexible, long-term OTC contract.
Airlines often enter into swap contracts of two years’ maturity

involving payment periods every six months where they either pay or
receive a cash amount as determined by the value of a specific Platts
index oil price. The swap contract relates to a specific amount of oil
which the airline is either contracted to take physical delivery of or is
bought on the spot market.
By entering into an energy swap agreement, the airline effectively

locks in the price of its fuel for the two-year period.
5. CONTRACT FOR DIFFERENCES (CFD)
CFD is a contract between an investor and a CFD provider, usually a broker,

that allows investors to speculate on the price movements of an underlying
security, typically a stock, on margin.
The CFD provider quotes bid and offer prices based on current market price
of the underlying stock. CFD trades like a stock. Upon opening a position,
the investor puts up margin with the broker, and pays a commission based
on the total value of the contract. A financing charge is applicable each day
that the position is open. Interest adjustments on a short position can appear
on the investor’s account either as a debit or a credit, because the financing
fee is subtracted from, rather than added to, the interbank offered rate when
calculating interest adjustments. The profits and losses are settled when the
position is closed.
CFDs are similar to futures and options with one distinctive difference - CFDs
do not have expiry dates. A CFD is effectively renewed at the close of each
trading day and rolled forward if desired, providing that there is enough
margin in the account to support the position. The investor in a CFD can
close the contract at any time.
Similar to other derivative instruments, CFDs allow investors the flexibility to

trade on both the long and the short sides of the market. By taking a long
position, the investor receives dividends and pays interest; while by taking a
short position, the investor pays dividends and receives interest.
Compared to normal share trading, CFD is leveraged, and the loss can be
greater than the original margin amount.
Example
The share price of Apple Inc is US$194.38. An investor believes that the
share price will rise and decides to take a long CFD position. The CFD
provider is quoting US$194.34 bid and US$194.42 offer.
Step 1 Opening a position
Buy 100 Apple CFDs at offer price.

This is the notional amount against
which commission, margin 100 x US$194.42 = US$19,442.00
requirement, profit and loss is
calculated.
Margin requirement is open position x

margin percentage. Typical margin for
equities is 5%-15%, depending on the
US$19,442.00 x 0.05 = US$972.10
liquidity of the underlying stock. In our
example, assume Apple CFDs require
margin of 5%.
Commission is 0.15%.
US$19,442.00 x 0.0015 = US$29.16
Step 2 Overnight Financing
To hold this position, a financing

charge is made each night. This is
normally based on a benchmark rate 0.0025+0.02
per cent like (SIBOR + broker margin) / US$19,442.00 x
365
365. For simplicity, we will assume
= US$1.20
that the price of Apple shares will stay
the same until the market close and so,
no P&L was generated on this day.
Step 3 Closing the position
The next day Apple share price has

risen by US$6.15, or 3.16%. The
investor decides to close the position
and take profit.
CFD provider is quoting US$200.50 bid

and US$200.58 offer.
Sell 100 Apple CFDs at bid price. 100 x US$200.50 = US$20,050.00
The position is now closed, and the

US$0.00
margin requirement is now zero.
The investor is charged commission of

US$20,050.00 x 0.0015 = US$30.08
0.15% on this transaction.
Gross profit is difference between the

US$20,050.00 – US$19,442.00 =
opening position and the closing
US$608
position.
The costs are commissions and US$29.16 + US$30.08 + US$1.20

overnight financing. = US$60.44
US$608.00 – US$60.44 =
Net profit after costs
US$547.56
In summary, the investor had put up US$972.10 to cover the margin on

this trade and made a 56% profit of US$547.56 on a 3% rise in the Apple
share price. If the price of Apple shares had dropped by US$6.15 instead,
he would have sustained a 70% loss of US$681.59 (i.e. a loss of
US$623 plus costs of US$58.59).
4. Introduction To Structured Funds
Chapter
4 INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURED FUNDS
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. What Is A Structured Fund?
2. Common Examples Of Structured Funds
3. What To Consider Before Investing In Structured Funds?
4. Governance
5. Typical Types Of Documentation And Risks
6. Determination Of Fund’s Market Value
KEY LEARNING POINTS

know what a structured fund is
list the common examples of structured funds
understand the considerations when investing in structured funds
understand the governance structure, documentation and risks when investing in
structured funds
understand the determination of a fund’s market value
1. WHAT IS A STRUCTURED FUND?
The investment fund structure is one of the possible wrappers for structured
products. An investment fund is considered a “structured fund” if it uses
derivative instruments or securities with embedded derivatives1, to generate
a specific risk-reward profile. The derivatives most commonly used in
structured funds are options, swaps and forwards for the purpose of
achieving a specific risk-return profile. There are other traditional methods
that can achieve the same goal, such as short-selling or trading on margins.
However, none is as expedient as derivatives.
Investment funds are also known as Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) or

managed funds. They are pooled investment vehicles. Individual investors
invest in a common fund, and a professional investment manager looks after
the operation and investments of the fund. The legal structure of the fund is
usually either a trust or a corporation. In the trust structure, the fund is
commonly known as a unit trust, as investors are allocated units in the trust
based on the amounts invested. In the corporate structure, it is an
investment company commonly known as mutual fund; investors are
shareholders of the investment company.
An investment fund can be open-ended, or closed-ended. Most CIS in

Singapore are open-ended, and the only closed-ended CIS are real estate
investment trusts. An open-ended fund has no fixed number of outstanding
units or shares. When an investor wants to invest, the fund manager issues
new units or shares to him and invests the money received. When an
investor wants to divest, the fund manager sells some of the fund assets,
pays the investor and cancels his units or shares. In practice, fund managers
offset cash inflows and outflows to minimise the need to offload investments
and the associated transaction costs.
On the other hand, a closed-ended fund has a fixed number of issued units or
shares. After the initial launch of the fund, the buying and selling of units or
shares takes place between investors, instead of between the investor and
the fund manager, as is the case with an open-ended fund. When an investor
wants to buy or sell his investment in a closed-ended fund, he must find
another investor who is willing to sell to or buy from him. For this reason,
closed-ended funds are typically listed on a stock exchange to facilitate a
ready secondary market.
While some funds use derivatives to achieve investment returns, some funds
use derivatives to “hedge” investment risks. “Hedging” means protection
from loss when market prices fluctuate. Hedging reduces risk, adds
additional costs, but does not necessarily enhance returns. For example, oil
futures and forward contracts are effective hedging tools for airlines to
hedge their exposure to fluctuations in fuel oil prices. Commodities users
(such as airlines for fuel oil, and tyre manufacturers for rubber) use
1
For example, an equity linked note is a debenture by legal structure, but it has a risk characteristic
similar to that of derivatives because of the derivative instrument that it incorporates into its structure.
derivatives to provide certainty of a large part of the costs of their goods and
services.
In share-trading, investors can reduce their exposure to market risk by using

stock options. For example, if an investor is taking a long position in a stock,
he may simultaneously take a put option on the same stock, so that he is
protected when market moves in either direction. Note that his return is in
fact lower by adopting a hedging strategy. This is the risk-reward trade-off
as discussed in previous chapter.
Swap agreements are another type of derivatives often used to reduce credit,
interest rate and currency risks.
Thus, the use of derivatives by a fund is not always an indication of

aggressive investment stance. While derivatives are often used to achieve
substantial degree of leverage, they are just as often used to mitigate risks.
1.1 Offer Of Structured Funds In Singapore
Both Singapore-domiciled and foreign-domiciled funds may be offered

to Singapore investors. To protect the investing public, the Securities
and Futures Act (Cap. 289) has specific requirements on the funds that
may be offered, and what information needs to be provided to potential
investors. The MAS has issued regulations to implement these legal
requirements.
The regulatory requirements differ depending on the fund’s targeted

customer segments. Funds targeting at retail investors must be
authorised (in the case of Singapore-domiciled funds) or recognised (in
the case of foreign-domiciled funds) by the MAS before they can be
offered.
Before granting the authorisation or recognition, a prospectus is lodged

with the MAS, giving details of the investment objectives, risks, fees
and charges, the parties responsible for the fund (i.e. managers,
trustees, custodians, etc.) and other operational matters. Since the
authorised and recognised collective investment schemes raise funds
from the public, the MAS requires the trustees and managers of these
funds to be “fit and proper”. The MAS also considers whether the
investment strategy of the fund complies with the guidelines in the
Code on Collective Investment Schemes (the Code). Although the Code
is non-statutory, compliance with the Code is almost mandatory
because non-compliance is a consideration for the MAS to withhold,
suspend or revoke the authorisation or recognition.
Funds targeting at accredited investors can apply for a restricted

scheme status, which has a lower level of compliance requirements.
For example, the investment restrictions in the Code do not apply to
restricted schemes. A fund is either a “restricted Singapore scheme” or
a “restricted foreign scheme”, depending on its place of domicile.
Besides investment guidelines, the Code also sets out best practices on
the management, operation and marketing of CIS that managers and
trustees are expected to observe.
1.2 Undertakings For Collective Investment In Transferable Securities (UCITS)
It is not possible to talk about CIS without mentioning UCITS.
They are investment funds that have been established in accordance with
European Union’s UCITS Directive, first adopted in 1985. Amended in
December 2001, this directive, known as UCITS III, is now in force.
(There is no UCITS II.) UCITs are typically structured as open-ended
investment companies.
Owing to the EU cross-border “passport” arrangement, once registered in

one EU member country, a UCITS fund can be freely marketed across the
EU. As of July 2009, UCITS funds manage Euro 5 trillion in assets.2 Most
of the recognised funds offered in Singapore are UCITS III compliant.
1.3 Common Terminology
The common terms used in the fund industry include:
Subscription The purchase of units or shares in a CIS.
Redemption The return of units or shares for cash.
Bid price The price at which units are redeemed.
Offer price The price at which units are subscribed.
Bid / offer spread The difference between the bid and offer
prices, usually in the range of 3% to 5%. This
is the manager’s fees for operating the fund.
This is separate from the investment
management fees which are charged directly
to the fund monthly or quarterly, based on the
assets under management (AUM) by the
investment managers.
Forward pricing Subscription and redemption of units are

based on bid / offer prices as determined on
the next asset valuation date. This is in
contrast with historic pricing, which uses bid /
offer prices as determined on the last asset
valuation date.
Net asset value (NAV) The total value of fund assets, less total
liabilities. Both assets and liabilities are valued
2
Source: European Commission website:
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/investment/ucits_directive_en.htm
in accordance with the provisions as specified

in the trust deed and regulatory requirements,
if any.
Switching of funds The transfer of units in one fund to another.
Expense ratio The ratio of the fund's operating expenses to

the daily average NAV. For Singapore
distributed funds, the calculation of expense
ratio should follow the guidelines issued by the
Investment Management Association of
Singapore (IMAS).
Operating expenses include investment

management fees, trustee’s fees,
administrative and custodial expenses, taxes,
legal fees, and auditing fees. Trading expenses
related to the buying and selling of fund assets
are not included in the calculation of expense
ratio.
Initial sales charges and redemption fees, if

any, are paid directly by investors and,
therefore, not included in expense ratio.
Turnover ratio The number of times that a dollar of assets is

reinvested in a given year. It is calculated
based on the lesser of purchases or sales of
underlying investments of a fund expressed as
a percentage of daily average NAV.
Trading incurs transaction costs. Therefore,

the higher the turnover, the higher will be the
transaction cost, which reduces the fund
returns.
For example, a stock index fund typically has a

low turnover ratio, but an equity fund typically
has high turnover, because active trading is an
inherent nature of equity investments. An
aggressive small-cap growth stock fund will
generally experience higher turnover than
a large-cap value stock fund.
Soft dollar commission An arrangement under which the fund

manager obtains additional products or
services from the broker in exchange for
directing the transaction execution to the
broker. In other words, these products and
services received by the fund manager are not
paid with “hard dollars”, i.e. cash.
For example, ABC Fund wants to buy some

research from XYZ Brokerage Firm. ABC
agrees to spend at least S$10,000 in
commission for the brokerage services in
return for research from XYZ. This is a soft
dollar payment. Alternatively, if ABC wanted
to simply buy the research from XYZ and not
agree to any kind of soft dollar arrangement,
it might have to pay the brokerage
firm S$7,000 in "hard dollars" (i.e. cash) for
the service.
Soft dollars includes research and advisory

services, economic and political analyses,
portfolio analyses, market analyses, data and
quotation services, computer hardware and
software used in support of the manager’s
investment process. Other "perks" such as
travel, accommodation and entertainment are
excluded.
Tracking error The inability of the fund to exactly track the

performance of the underlying index. The main
reasons for tracking errors are (a) expenses;
(b) complexity of the underlying index; and (c)
accessibility of the underlying market to
achieve replication.
2. COMMON EXAMPLES OF STRUCTURED FUNDS
The use of the phrase “structured funds” indicates the fact that these funds
use derivative instruments to achieve their investment objectives. Hence,
structured funds encompass a broad spectrum of funds, namely equity
funds, bond funds, funds by specific geographic locations, or by investment
styles (long only, multi-strategy, etc). Conversely, equity funds encompass
both structured and traditional funds.
In this section, we will explore a few common structured funds to give a

flavour of the variety of funds available. Chapter 5 discusses their relative
advantages and disadvantages, and governance structure in greater detail.
2.1 Index Funds
An index fund aims to replicate the performance of a market index on

equities, fixed income instruments or other securities. The index may
be a commercial index (such as the S&P 500), or an index customised
for the specific purpose of the fund. Index funds are also called tracker
funds, for obvious reasons. Indexing is a passive form of investment, as
there is no active stock-picking involved. Hence, fund management fees
and transaction costs are lower as compared to an actively managed

fund.
Investors choose index funds for their low expense ratios and low
portfolio turnover. Moreover, a great number of actively managed funds
failed to outperform broad market indices, giving support to a school of
thought that active portfolio management does not add value over the
long run.
Remember that the purpose of an index fund is to track the

performance of the index, not to beat the index. So, the index fund is
not meant to outperform the broad market index that it tracks.
The fund achieves the index replication through one of the following
three methods, in increasing degree of fund manager’s intervention:
(a) Full Replication: Under this method, the fund invests in all
component securities in the benchmark index, in the exact same
proportion as the index, to achieve near-full replication of the index.
It should be noted that full replication is not possible due to
tracking error.
For example, a fund may set up to track the Straits Times Index
(STI)3 may invest in all 30 component stocks of STI, in the same
weighting as the index is calculated. The fund should fully track the
STI performance by design. Nonetheless, the expenses borne by
the fund (management fees, trading costs, audit fees, preparation
of investor statements, etc.) inevitably reduces performance of the
fund as compared to the index, which is a pure price index.
(b) Optimisation Or Sampling: The full replication method may be

costly, as it involves buying all component stocks in the index. To
reduce tracking error, a fund may not hold each index component
securities in the same proportion as in the index, but mirrors the
characteristics of the index by creating buckets for each of the
observed characteristics, such as industry group, market
capitalisation and the company domicile. By holding fewer
securities, the fund experiences lower transaction cost, and lower
tracking error.
However, the reduction in transaction cost is offset by the increase

in fund management fees, due to a higher degree of manager
attention to create and maintain the sampling methodology.
(c) Synthetic Replication: The fund uses a combination of bonds,

stocks and derivatives (such as swaps, forwards, and futures) to
3
STI is a market capitalisation weighted index and involves the total market capitalisation of the
companies weighted by their effect on the index. This means that larger stocks make more of a
difference to the movement of the index, as compared to a smaller market cap company. For
example, CapitaLand (4.88%) will need to move “two times more” as compared to SingTel
(9.78%) in order to shift the STI to the same extent.
replicate the movement of an index. The name of this method

came from the use of synthetic products (i.e. derivatives) to
achieve the replication.
For example, suppose the fund is invested in stocks A, B and C

which are not STI component stocks, but it wants to replicate the
performance of the STI. The fund enters into a swap agreement
with Bank X, to exchange the performance of these two portfolios.
(There is a cost for the swap agreement.) This way, the fund can
replicate the performance of STI exactly, subject to the
counterparty’s (i.e. Bank X) ability to fulfil its contractual
obligations.
Synthetic replication method can be used to track the opposite of

market movement, or multiples of market movement. (See Chapter
5 for an example.)
Technically, funds using full, optimisation or sampling replication

methods are not structured funds. Only funds using synthetic
replication are.
Tracking error is the main disadvantage of index funds. Synthetic

tracker funds have lower tracking errors as compared to direct
replication funds, because the use of swaps and futures can
achieve more precise replication. However, the use of derivatives
introduces counterparty risks to the fund and, ultimately, the
investors.
Listed investment funds are known as exchange-traded funds

(ETFs). Almost all ETFs are index funds, although any type of funds
can be listed in theory.
2.2 Fund Of Funds (FoF)
A FoF is an investment fund that invests in other investment funds,

instead of direct investments in securities. A FoF is also called a multi-
manager fund. The role of the manager of a FoF is to select the sub-
funds in which to invest, and monitor their performance to decide
whether to replace non-performing funds. He also decides the allocation
of investments into each sub-fund, within the parameters of the fund’s
investment strategy.
Figure 4.1: Structure Of A Sample FoF
Fund Of Funds
US Large Caps Asia Ex-Japan Short-term

Long / Short Growth Money Market
Sub-funds
There are different types of FoF, investing in different types of funds,

e.g. fund of hedge funds (FoHF), or fund of private equity funds. In the
revised CIS Code most recently amended in August 2014, the MAS
mentioned that, in the naming of a scheme, the term “fund-of-funds”
must appear in the name of a FoF for greater transparency, e.g. XYZ
Global Conservative Balanced Fund-of-Funds.
FoFs may adopt many different investment strategies and styles. Just
like not all index funds are structured funds, only FoFs that invest in
structured funds are considered structured FoFs.
2.3 Hedge Funds
Hedge funds today have a reputation of being an aggressive investment

style. Quite the contrary, the name came from the original intention of
hedge funds: to reduce market risks through the use of short selling.
How can a speculative technique such as short selling reduce risk? This
is achieved by taking long positions on undervalued stocks and short on
overvalued stocks. Thus, the portfolio is split between stocks that
would gain if the market is up, and stocks that would gain if the market
is down. In other words, the fund is “hedged”.
Sociologist and financial journalist, Alfred Winslow Jones, founded one

of the first modern hedge funds in 1949. Jones's fund used leverage
and short selling to "hedge" its stock portfolio against drops in stock
prices. Back then, Jones's model was immensely successful, earning
44 percent higher returns than the best-performing equity asset fund,
even though he charged a 20% fee on the fund’s gain.4
Estimates of the size of the hedge fund industry vary widely due to the
absence of central collection of statistics, and indeed, the lack of an
4
Source: International Monetary Fund.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2006/06/basics.htm
agreed definition of hedge funds. The Alternate Investment

Management Association (AIMA) estimated the global industry size to
be US$2.5 trillion as of June 2008.
While the investment mandates of hedge funds are typically wide and
include the possible use of derivatives, not all hedge funds are
structured funds.
2.4 Enhanced Index Fund
Enhanced index funds are designed to enhance the return potential of

index funds. In other words, they add elements of active portfolio
management to passively managed index funds. By doing so, the cost
advantage of indexing is reduced, in exchange for potentially higher
return.
The return-enhancement techniques include:

the use of customised indexes, or dynamic instead of static indexes;
the use of intelligent trading algorithms to generate value through
trading, e.g. buying illiquid positions at a discount;
the use of filters to eliminate index component securities that are
likely to drag down performance, e.g. companies with excessive
debt; and
reduction of portfolio turnover by allowing funds to hold positions.
Only those funds using synthetic replication methods are considered

structured funds.
2.5 Formula Fund
Instead of following price movements of the underlying assets, some

structured fund may follow a formula in determining the fund’s returns.
These funds are generically called formula funds. Again, formula funds
may be structured funds or not, and may encompass a wide spectrum
of investment styles, and asset classes.
A formula fund may be quite straight forward in its formula. For

example, a five-year capital guaranteed STI index fund can be
considered a formula fund, where the formula for the target return is
the return of capital plus 90% of STI performance after five years. It
uses a risk-free bond to provide the capital guarantee, and an option or
a swap to provide 90% STI performance. As shown in Chapter 1, there
can be many variations based on different degrees of guarantees, and
different types of option-based payoffs. They all fall broadly under the
umbrella of “formula funds”.
There are also formula funds of more complex structure, where the
returns are determined by the relative performance of two underlying
indexes. For example, if the cumulative performance of Index A is
greater than or equal to the cumulative performance of Index B at the
end of each quarter, then the fund is credited with x% p.a. for that
quarter. However, if the cumulative performance of Index A is lower
than that of Index B at the end of the quarter, then the fund is credited
with y% p.a. for the quarter. In other words, the performance of the
fund depends on Index A outperforming Index B on a cumulative basis.
The name by which the fund is called or classified is not as important

as understanding the risk-return profile of the fund.
3. WHAT TO CONSIDER BEFORE INVESTING IN STRUCTURED FUNDS?
Since a structured fund is a CIS, the consideration of investing in one must

begin by considering whether a CIS is the right vehicle in the first place, with
the added consideration of the implication of investing in structured
products.
3.1 Advantages Of Investing In A CIS
Individual investors typically do not have the knowledge, resources or

time to perform adequate analysis of investment opportunities. Nor do
they typically have large enough portfolio to implement effective
portfolio diversification. Thus, a pooled-investment vehicle, such as
CIS, offers the average investors the advantages as described below.
Professional Management
The manager of a CIS is an investment professional who evaluates
market conditions, seeks out investment opportunities, monitors the
portfolio regularly, and conducts trading on behalf of the fund. While
the investments are governed by the investment mandate given to
the manager, he usually has the stated flexibility to make tactical
decisions to deviate from the mandate within a certain range to tap
or avoid emerging opportunities or risks.
The fund manager may hire sub-managers particularly in specialty

investment areas.
Portfolio Diversification
Diversification means investing in different assets within an asset
class, and also in different asset classes. Simply put, diversification
means “don’t put all your eggs in one basket”.
Because asset prices do not move in synchrony, the downward

movement in one asset may be offset by the upward movement in
another. Hence, a diversified portfolio is less risky and less volatile.
However, it requires a large portfolio to achieve effective
diversification, often beyond the means of individual investors. A CIS
allows individuals the means to diversify through the pooled
investment mechanism.
Access To Bulky Investments

Some investments are issued in large sizes, e.g. corporate bonds
issued in millions of dollars. Individually, investors will not have the
financial means to tap such bulky investments. Collectively through
a CIS, they can access these opportunities on par with other
institutional investors.
Economies Of Scale
Transaction costs are typically scaled: the larger the size of the
transaction, the lower will be the per-unit cost. A CIS can take
advantage of its buying and selling size, and thereby reduce
transaction costs for its investors.
3.2 Disadvantages Of Investing In A CIS
A CIS is not without drawbacks.
Fees and Charges

A CIS has several layers of expenses. The front-end sales charge is
typically between 3% and 5%, most of which is paid to the sales
personnel as commission. The investment manager (and their sub-
managers) and the trustee charge an annual fee for their services,
based on the size of the fund and asset classes in which the fund is
invested. In addition, the fund manager may levy a redemption
charge in the magnitude of another 1% to 3%. Hence, it may take
considerable time for the fund performance to make up for the layers
of expenses charged.
For this reason, a CIS is not a good short-term investment

instrument. An investor needs to have a medium to long-term time
horizon when considering investing in a CIS.
Loss Of Investment Control

The flip side of enjoying professional management expertise is the
loss of investment decisions by individual unit-holders. So long as
the fund manager invests in accordance with the prospectus and
trust deed, there is little that a unit-holder can do if he disagrees
with the investment decisions, except to redeem the holdings from
the investment scheme.
Keep in mind that fund managers are investment professionals. They

are more likely to make the right investment decision than individual
investors. Nonetheless, a CIS is not the right investment vehicle for
investors who prefer to make all investment decisions themselves.
3.3 Additional Considerations For Structured Funds
In addition to the advantages and disadvantages in investing in CIS in

general, an investor considering structured funds should also consider
the risks of structured products, particularly those mentioned below.
Counterparty Risk
Investors in a structured fund are exposed to the risk that the
counterparty to derivatives contracts may become unable to fulfil the
terms of the contracts, resulting in losses to the fund.
Investors are also exposed to the counterparty’s credit risk. For

example, the counterparty may suffer a credit downgrade due to
adverse changes in its financial condition. Even though the
counterparty has not defaulted, the market value of the financial
contract may fall nonetheless, affecting the asset value of the fund.
Furthermore, the international investment banking community has

become highly inter-related. The default of one counterparty may
cause a domino effect on other counterparties. Hence, investors in a
structured fund may suffer a greater loss than they expect from the
default of a single counterparty, if other counterparties become
embroiled in the credit crunch.
Liquidity Risk
Derivative contracts are at times difficult to price and affix a market
value to. Therefore, typically, structured funds are valued less
frequently (such as monthly) compared to traditional funds. An
investor in a structured fund may not be able to redeem his units
when he wishes to do so.
Furthermore, the size of a structured fund may be smaller as

compared to traditional funds, because of its specialised nature. The
small size, combined with a common provision limiting the size of
the unit redemption on a single day (such as 10% of total units
outstanding), may further restrict the liquidity of the unit-holding.
When the redemption limit is reached for a particular day, investors
wishing to redeem on that day can only redeem a pro-rated number
of units.
Also, early redemption may lead to a loss of certain protection

features, such as those for capital guaranteed funds.
Conflict Of Interest
Conflicts of interest may arise in a few ways. The manager has the
interest to generate fees and charges, directly in conflict with the
investors’ interest in keeping cost low.
The manager normally manages funds of other clients that make

similar investments as the structured fund on hand. While the
manager is expected to allocate available investments or
opportunities equitably among his clients, situations can arise where
the allocation procedures adversely affect the price paid or cash
received for a specific fund.
Trustee has the role to protect fund participants’ best interest. This
includes managing the potential areas of conflict of interest. For this
reason, independence between the trustee and the manager is an

important factor.
4. GOVERNANCE
4.1 The Typical Structure Of Funds
In Singapore, most investment funds take the legal form of unit trusts.
The relevant parties to a unit trust are as follows:
(a) Trust deed is the legal document for setting up the trust. It defines
the operational parameters of the trust, including the nature of the
trust, the investment objectives and restrictions, the removal and
replacement of the trustee, manager and auditor, duties and
obligations of the trustee, the restriction on the powers of the
manager, the charges, the unit pricing formulas, and the
remuneration of the manager and trustee;
(b) Unit-holders are beneficiary owners of the trust assets;
(c) Trustee acts on behalf of unit-holders and oversees the proper
operation of the trust, including ensuring that (i) the manager
operates the trust in accordance with the trust deed, (ii) the
investment manager directs investments according to the investment
agreement, and (iii) legal compliance; and
(d) Manager performs the duties of day-to-day operation of the trust,
including handling unit subscription and redemption, NAV
determination, unit pricing, making investment decisions, preparing
reports and accounts to the trustee, and pay expenses and taxes.
The manager often appoints sub-managers, particularly in specialty
investment areas.
To ensure proper check and balance, the trustee and manager must be
independent of each other.
Unit trusts offered to retail investors must be valued daily, except

structured funds may be valued at least once a month, hedge funds at
least once a quarter, and property funds at least once a year.
4.2 Role Of The Trustee Or The Board Of Directors
The trustee (in the case of a unit trust) and the board of directors (in
the case of an investment company) have the responsibility to
safeguard the fund assets in the investors’ interest, and to ensure
compliance with the regulatory requirements.
Only a public company approved by the MAS as a trustee under the

Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) can act as a trustee to a
Singapore-domiciled unit trust. The statutory duty of care and general
powers of trustees are specified in the Trustees Act (Cap. 337).
Specifically, the trustee is the legal owner of trust assets, holding them
for the exclusive benefits of the beneficiary owners of the trust, i.e. the
unit-holders. The trustee’s duties are to:
(a) protect the interests of unit-holders by ensuring that the fund is run
in accordance with the trust deed, the regulations, and the
prospectus;
(b) act as custodian for the trust assets, or to delegate this function to a
third-party custodian. The trust assets are registered in the name of
the trustee who also holds the trust income;
(c) create and maintain the register of unit-holders or delegate this
function to the fund manager;
(d) replace the managers if they are deemed not to be acting in unit-
holders’ interests, become insolvent, or if the majority of unit-holders
vote to remove them;
(e) send reports and accounts to the unit-holders, or delegate this
function to the fund manager; and
(f) report any breaches to the MAS.
The trustee is remunerated by a fee, based on a percentage of the fund

size.
4.3 Fiduciary Obligation Of A Fund Manager
The fund manager is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the trust,
including investment management, marketing and administration. Some
of the manager’s functions may be delegated to third parties.
Fund managers of authorised schemes (for retail investors) must be

licensed to conduct fund management activities by the MAS under the
Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) and related regulations. In granting
the licence, the MAS takes into consideration the manager’s track record,
financial strength and reputation.
Managers of recognised schemes (for retail investors) and restricted

schemes (for accredited investors) must be licensed to conduct fund
management activities in jurisdictions of their principal places of business.
The fund manager’s operational duties are to:

(a) make payments to unit-holders who have redeemed their units, and
other payments to entities providing services to the fund;
(b) prepare accounts and reports for unit-holders;
(c) keep records of instructions to the trustee on voting relating to the
fund’s investments, and soft dollar commissions received;
(d) maintain a record of all soft dollars received;
(e) consult the trustee when there is a conflict of interest in exercising
voting rights relating to the fund’s investments;
(f) give notice to the unit-holders on significant changes to the fund;
(g) obtain resolution of unit-holders for changes to the trust deed;

(h) conduct all transactions with or for the fund at arm’s length; and
(i) report of breaches of the investment guidelines to the MAS.
The manager is prohibited from:

(a) paying marketing or promotion expenses out of the fund assets;
(b) charging costs of CPF failed trades to the fund; or
(c) receiving soft dollar commissions; unless –
the soft dollars received can reasonably be expected to assist in
the manager’s provision of investment advice or related services to
the fund;
transactions are executed on the best available terms, taking into
account the market at the time for transactions of the kind and
size concerned; and
the manager does not enter into unnecessary trades, in order to
achieve a sufficient volume of transactions to qualify for the soft
dollars.
The managers are paid an annual management fee, based on the asset
class and size of the funds. In addition, any bid-offer spread and
redemption charges are paid to the managers.
4.4 Investment Guidelines For Retail Funds
Funds offered to retail investors need to comply with the investment

guidelines in the Code on Collective Investment Schemes (the Code)5, or
risk their authorised or recognised status being withheld, suspended or
revoked by the MAS. The purpose of the Code is to foster retail
investors’ confidence in Singapore retail funds. The Code strives to
balance investors’ interest with industry developments, because overly
restrictive investment guidelines are not necessarily to the investors’
advantage.
5. TYPICAL TYPES OF DOCUMENTATION AND RISKS
5.1 Risk Considerations
Chapter 2 has identified various risk factors for structured products,

namely market risk, counterparty credit risk, liquidity risk, FX risk, risks
inherent in the product structure, and others. It is not possible to
completely eliminate investment risks. Even the safest investments,
sovereign securities, carry a minimal level of risk that a country may
default. A more appropriate response is to manage risks according to
risk tolerance.
5
The requirements of the Code are covered under CMFAS Module 8 – Collective Investments
Schemes. The requirements of the Revised Code are covered under CMFAS Module 5 – Rules and
Regulations for Financial Advisory Services.
There are various risk management techniques that an investor may

adopt to mitigate or manage the investment risks.
A common method to reduce market risks is diversification of

investments across asset classes and geographic locations. Different
asset classes react to changes in economic conditions differently. The
market value of fixed income instruments is directly correlated to the
movement of interest rates. When interest rate goes up, the value of
bonds comes down. However, interest rate is only one of many factors
that affect stock prices. An increase in interest rate may or may not
cause stock prices to decline. Thus, by holding investments in a broad
spectrum of asset classes, the downturn in one asset class is likely to
offset the upturns in other asset classes. This is similarly true for
investments in different geographic locations.
Investing in negatively correlated securities is another common method

of risk mitigation. Negatively correlated securities move in opposite
direction. As the price of stock A declines, the price of stock B which is
negatively correlated to stock A appreciates.
Credit and FX risks can be shared or transferred to another party

through the use of swaps and credit derivatives. However, keep in
mind that, while the use of derivatives may mitigate one type of risk, it
introduces another, namely the counterparty risk. Also, risk mitigation
affects return. When all risks are mitigated, the investment return is
likely to be zero or negative. Therefore, the art of investment is to
manage risks within a tolerable range, while maintaining an acceptable
level of investment returns.
5.2 Pre-sale Documentation
Before the sale of a financial product, an adviser should (a) present

clients with sufficient information about the products under
consideration in the form of prospectuses and product highlights
sheets; and (b) document the advisory process that he has followed.
Marketing and advertising materials for investment products should

give a fair and balanced view of the product. Such materials are “fair
and balanced” if they:
(a) are clear and easily understood by the audience being addressed;
(b) set out clearly both the potential upside and downside of the
investment;
(c) highlight prominently the risks of the product;
(d) do not give the impression that an investor can profit without risk;
(e) do not present information in footnotes if such presentation will
cause difficulty to an investor in understanding the product; and
(f) do not omit any material information if the omission will cause the
marketing and advertising materials to be misleading.
5.3 Post-sale Disclosure
After the sale of a financial product, the issuer has the responsibility to
provide regular updates to the client, to ensure transparency, and
facilitate the client’s decision on whether to continue or exit his
investment.
The ongoing disclosure includes regular semi-annual and annual reports

to the unit-holders6, and ad hoc notification of significant changes to
the CIS before the change is to take effect7,
As far as possible, ongoing disclosures can be made online. This will be

more convenient for both the issuer and the investor, and will allow for
more timely disclosures. Issuers should promptly inform investors of the
release of electronic reports, and should disclose clearly how and where
to access these reports. Nonetheless, issuers should provide investors
with the option of obtaining printed copies of the reports if they so
wish.
5.4 Redemption Prices
The determination of net asset value should be done every business

day. For illiquid investments, the valuation may be less frequent. For
example, hedge funds may be valued minimally once a quarter, and
property funds once a year.
Disclosures of bid or redemption prices could be made available on

either the issuer’s or the distributor’s website. The issuer should clearly
disclose to the investors in its prospectus where to obtain pricing
information. The issuer should also disclose the frequency that prices
are updated.
6. DETERMINATION OF FUND’S MARKET VALUE
The practice of marking to market (MTM) has been a practice for exchange-
traded futures contracts for many years, for the purpose of calculating daily
margin calls. Since the contracts are traded on the exchange, the market
prices are readily available, and the MTM easily determinable.
The process is more difficult for OTC (over the counter) derivatives (and
other products based on OTC derivatives) because of the absence of
“market” prices. Hence, MTM for OTC derivatives are often done by
mathematical models, similar to the pricing of such instruments. As
mentioned in Chapter 1, complexities of the products and sophistication (or
the lack thereof) of the models are limiting factors. Consequently, MTM for
OTC instruments may be done less frequently.
6
For more details, refer to SFA 13-G11 - Guidelines on Ongoing Disclosure Requirements for
Unlisted Debentures, issued on 21 October 2010.
7
Refer to paragraph 3.2(d) of the CIS Code for examples of significant changes.
MTM is important to investment funds, because it is the basis of determining

NAV, which is the building block of bid and offers prices used for investors
to buy and sell units in the fund. If the NAV is understated, those exiting the
fund will be short-changed. If the NAV is overstated, those entering the fund
will overpay.
However, the challenge is that market prices are not always readily available,
particularly for certain asset classes.
6.1 Quoted Shares
The Code on CIS requires that the value of quoted securities of a fund
should be based on the official closing price or the last known
transacted price on the market.
Nonetheless, if the manager of the fund believes that the transacted

price is not representative or not available to the market, NAV should
then be based on “fair value” of the assets, which is the same MTM
basis that applies to unquoted securities of a fund.
Fair value is the price that the fund can reasonably expect to receive
upon the current sale of the asset. The basis for determining the fair
value of the asset should be documented.
When the fair value of a material portion of the fund cannot be

determined, the manager should suspend valuation and trading of the
units.
6.2 Debt Securities
If the debt security is listed or quoted, the same basis for quoted shares
applies.
If the debt security is not listed or quoted, the “market value” of the
security is the fair value, taking into account the prevailing interest
rate, the likelihood of default by the issuer, and the cash flows that are
expected to arise from the debt security.
6.3 Financial Derivatives
Most financial derivatives are unique OTC contracts, which makes

MTM valuations much more challenging. Counterparty risks also bear a
significant consideration in the MTM process.
(a) Straightforward Cash Flow: Some derivative products are based on

streams of future cash flows. Forward rate agreements, interest
rate swaps and currency swaps are examples of such products.
MTM is the discounted cash flows, taking into account probability
of the counterparty default.
(b) Conditional Cash Flow: The cash flows for some complex
derivative products are affected by caps, floors, calls, knock-outs,
etc. The MTM valuation needs to take into account the probability
that the cash flows may change. This is why mathematical models,
similar to the pricing models, are typically used in MTM valuations.
There are different models for different products. The complexity of
the models and robustness of assumptions about market volatility
are the major challenges to the process.
(c) Illiquid Cash Flow: There are no simple solutions to valuing illiquid
assets. Third-party credit data may be available in some cases for
valuing credit derivatives. In other situations, the valuation depends
on the fund manager’s judgement and experience.
5. Examples Of Structured Funds
Chapter
5 EXAMPLES OF STRUCTURED FUNDS
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. Structured Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
2. Hedge Funds
3. Fund Of Funds
4. Formula Funds
KEY LEARNING POINTS

understand and explain the various types of structured funds:
- structured Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
- hedge funds
- fund of funds
- formula funds
1. STRUCTURED EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS (ETFs)
1.1 What Is An ETF?
Let’s first discuss ETFs in general before we focus on a sub-set of ETFs

–structured ETFs.
As the name suggests, an Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) is an

investment fund that is listed and traded on the stock exchange.
The creation of ETF units occurs when the Participating Dealer buys
securities from the market and gives them to the Fund Manager in
exchange for units in the fund. These securities form the portfolio of
the fund and are held by a custodian. These ETF units are then listed
on the stock exchange. After listing, the units are traded on the
secondary market just like any other stocks. The trading mainly occurs
between investors. The trading may also occur between the investors
and the Participating Dealer in its duty as the marketmaker to provide
liquidity and to keep market prices close to the fund’s NAV.
Figure 5.1: The Structure Of An ETF
Primary Market
Security
Custodian Fund Manager
ETF Units
ETF Units
Security
Security
Redemption
Creation
Participating
Dealers
ETF Units ETF Units

Cash Cash
Exchange
Buyer of ETF Seller of ETF

Units Units
Cash
ETF Units
Secondary Market
Source: An Investor’s Guide to Exchange Traded Funds, SGX
When the market demand of these units drives the market price above
the NAV of the fund, the Participating Dealer generates a new supply
of units through the creation process. Similarly, when market demand
declines and the units are trading below the NAV, the Participating
Dealer buys units from the market, and returns them to the Fund
Manager in exchange for securities. The redeemed units are cancelled
by the Fund Manager. Through this primary market creation and
redemption mechanism, it ensures the liquidity (i.e. there are sufficient
units of ETFs) in the secondary market. Thus, the Participating Dealer
serves an important function of keeping the market price of ETF units
close to the fund’s NAV.
It is also important to understand that, due to this primary market

creation / redemption mechanism, the liquidity of the ETF units directly
correlates to the liquidity of the underlying index components. That is,
so long as the underlying component stock is liquid, thanks to this
creation / redemption mechanism, the ETF units can be created and
redeemed efficiently.
Each ETF has at least one designated marketmaker to provide intraday

liquidity by quoting bid / offer prices. Note that the designated market
maker for an ETF and the participating dealer may not be the same
person.
Most ETFs are index funds, although in theory, any kind of funds can
be listed. There are two types of ETFs (see below) based on how they
achieve the replication of index.
(a) Direct Replication (Or Cash-Based) ETF

These funds replicate the index through direct investment into the
component securities of the indexes that they aim to track. These
funds may employ the full replication, optimisation or sampling
methods as discussed in Chapter 4.
(b) Synthetic ETF

These ETFs use synthetic financial instruments to replicate the
movement in the index, for the following reasons:
enlarge the choice of underlying index to include exotic market
(e.g. stocks restricted markets) or enhanced payouts (e.g.
leveraging);
reduce tracking error; and
tax considerations.
1.2 Comparing ETFs With Unlisted Index Funds
ETFs are fundamentally index funds traded on the stock exchange.

However, not all index funds are ETFs. The main differences between
listed (i.e. ETFs) and unlisted index funds include:
(a) Distribution Channel And Charges

The buying and selling of units of unlisted index funds take place
between the investor and the fund manager, through the financial
advisers and representatives of banks that act as appointed
distributors for the funds. The front-end distribution cost is typically
3% to 5% in Singapore.
The buying and selling of ETFs, on the other hand, take place
between investors (or with the marketmaker), through any
securities broker. The brokerage commission is typically 0.25% to
0.5%. The stock exchange charges a clearing fee of 0.04%.
(b) Unit Price

Unit prices of unlisted index funds are based on the NAV of fund
assets. While the fundamental value of ETF unit prices is also
based on the NAV, actual transaction price is affected by market
forces of supply and demand. ETFs depend on marketmakers to
keep prices close to the NAV.
(c) Operational Expenses

ETF fund managers deal with participating dealers in bulk units. The
resulting economies of scale enables ETF managers to achieve
lower expense ratios as compared to unlisted index funds which
deal with individual retail investors.
(d) Liquidity
Subscription and redemption of unlisted index funds are only
possible on valuation dates. In contrast, ETF investors can buy and
sell every day and intraday as long as the stock exchange is open.
Marketmakers are obligated to provide intraday price quotes to
provide liquidity. However, when the underlying fund assets are
illiquid, marketmakers may quote bid-offer prices with wide margins
to protect themselves.
1.3 Comparing ETFs With Unit Trusts
As mentioned above, ETFs are investment funds (mainly index funds)

listed and traded on the stock exchange. Although both unit trusts and
ETFs are similar in the way that they are managed by professional fund
managers, the listing process results in many characteristic differences
in these two classes of investments as discussed below.
(a) Transaction Method

Investors typically buy and sell unit trusts through a distribution
channel. It can be through banks, financial advisers or online
portals. On the other hand, ETFs are bought and sold on the stock
exchange through a securities broker.
(b) Fees
When buying unit trusts, investors pay an upfront sales charge
typically in the range of 3% to 5%. On the other hand, ETF
investors pay a brokerage fee of about 0.25% to 0.5% and
clearing fees of about 0.04%.
(c) Pricing
The NAV of a unit trust is based on forward pricing and the actual
NAV is only known after placement of the order. Buying and selling
of the units in the unit trust is based on end-of-day prices, which
are not known to the investors at time of purchase. That is, the
investors do not know how many units they have purchased until
the day after the pricing day. By contrast, the ETF pricing is based
on the market quote, made known to the investor when the order
is placed. There is greater pricing certainty with ETFs.
A potential downside of ETF pricing is that the market pricing may

deviate from the true value of the underlying investments. When
this happens, the participating dealer can create or redeem units to
keep the traded prices of ETF units close to the underlying NAV.
(d) Liquidity
Because ETFs are traded throughout the trading day, investors in
ETFs enjoy greater liquidity. By contrast, unit trust investors can
liquidate their holdings only following a pricing which occurs at
most once a day.
1.4 Comparing ETFs With Shares
Both ETFs and shares are listed securities, and share many common
characteristics: they are both listed on the relevant stock exchanges;
buying and selling transactions are done through securities brokers; and
pricings are determined by market quotes. However, there are
fundamental differences in the nature of investments in shares and
investments in ETFs. The main difference is diversification.
A purchase of shares is an investment in a single company. It allows

the investor to take part in the performance (or non-performance) of
that company alone. A purchase of an ETF, on the other hand, allows
the investor to take part in the performance of all the underlying
companies. It should be obvious that the concentration risk of investing
in a single company is much higher compared to that of investing in a
group of companies. If an investor were to achieve the same degree of
diversification, he would need to purchase shares of all the underlying
companies in an ETF. Therefore, an ETF provides a convenient and
cost-effective way to manage market risk through diversification.
The extent of diversification varies between ETFs. The investor needs

to judge for himself whether a particular ETF under consideration meets
his risk appetite. The investor also needs to keep in mind that, while
diversification protects him from the downside, it also caps his upside.
1.5 Changes In Index Constituents
Index providers periodically review which securities to include or omit

from the index, according to the rules as set in the index methodology.
This is known as “re-balancing”. ETFs are adjusted to include securities
(that the index includes) and omit securities that are dropped from the
index. This ensures that the ETF performance will mirror the
performance of the index.
Example
A company such as the Bank of China gets listed in Hong Kong and
the Hang Seng Index is re-balanced to include the company in the
index. An ETF that tracks the Hang Seng Index is also rebalanced to
include Bank of China in the fund constituents.
This is the same for ETFs that track indices on bonds or commodities.
1.6 Determination Of Fair Value Of An ETF
Similar to unit trusts, the NAV is used to obtain the price of an ETF
unit. The NAV per unit is the total value of assets less liabilities of the
fund, divided by the number of outstanding ETF units. The NAV is
calculated at the end of each trading day. To facilitate trading, an
indicative Net Asset Value (iNAV) is calculated periodically throughout
the trading day as an estimate of the NAV. The iNAV is sometimes
known as IOPV (Indicative Optimised Portfolio Value) or IIV (Indicative
Intraday Value).
Example
An ETF on the Nasdaq Index has a net asset value of S$2,800,000

and 100,000 ETF units have been created. Hence, the Net Asset
Value per ETF unit is S$28.00.
When the stock market opens for trading, the volatility of the market
will result in price fluctuation. As a result, the NAV per ETF unit may
correspondingly rise or fall. The investors can find out the NAV and
the iNAV by visiting the websites of Fund Managers. By referring to
the NAV and iNAV, an investor can have updated information on the
estimated fair value of his ETF investments. The investor can also
compare the iNAV and the price of the ETF quoted in the stock
market.
1.7 Difference Between The Price Of ETF And Its NAV
The investor has to take note that an ETF may trade at a price that
differs from its NAV. Just like stocks, the price on an ETF is set on a
willing buyer and willing seller basis. At anytime during the trading
hours, the ETF can be at a premium, par or discount value. The ETF is
trading at a premium when the ETF price is higher than that of the
iNAV. When the ETF is trading at a discount, the ETF price is lower
than that of the iNAV.
In the process of buying and selling, the participating dealer can create
or redeem ETF units to meet the market demand. This is beneficial to
the investors, as it ensures the ETF price is kept close to the NAV of
the ETF.
1.8 Summary Of Comparison Of ETFs, Shares And Unit Trusts
ETFs Shares Unit Trusts

Diversification X
Estimated
0.25 – 0.5 % 0.25 – 0.5% 3-5%
Transaction Costs1
Management Fees Less than 1% X 1 – 2 % p.a.2
Intraday Pricing &
X
Trading
Trading Flexibility X
Liquidity Intraday Intraday End-of-day
Cash Settlement T+3 T+3 Upfront
1.9 What Are Structured ETFs?
Structured ETFs are structured funds that are traded on the stock
exchange. Only synthetic ETFs are structured ETFs. For the remainder
of this chapter, we exclude cash-based ETFs from the discussion, and
focus only on synthetic ETFs.
There are currently two methods to achieve synthetic replication.

(Future product innovation may invent other methods.)
Swap-based: The ETF is invested in a basket of securities that may
not be the component stocks of the underlying index, and engages
the use of equity swaps to exchange the performance of the assets
in the ETF against the performance of the underlying index.
Alternatively, instead of making investments, an ETF may be set up

to pass the cash raised from the investors directly to the swap
counterparty in exchange for the returns on the index. To mitigate
the counterparty risk, the swap counterparty posts collateral with
the fund which is enforceable in the event that the counterparty
defaults on its obligations to the fund.
Derivative-embedded: The ETF invests in derivatives instruments that

are linked to the index, such as warrants and participatory
certificates or notes. (Participatory notes are referred to as P-notes
for short.)
1
Brokerage and clearing fees for ETFs & Shares while upfront sales charge for unit trusts.
2
Note that this is the typical fee range for all unit trusts. Index funds charge lower fees due to the
passive investment nature of such funds. Hence, the management fees for index funds are
comparable to that for ETFs.
1.10 Long, Short And Leveraged ETFs
Most ETFs are index funds, tracking the performance of an underlying

index. An ETF is a “long ETF” when it moves in the same direction as
the index. On the other hand, a “short ETF” (also known as inverse ETF
or bear ETF) tracks the underlying index in the opposite (that is,
inverse) direction. Short ETFs use short selling, derivatives, and other
investment techniques to achieve the inverse performance of the
underlying index.
Leveraging allows funds to achieve multiple times the performance of

an index, either long or short.
Example: Dow Jones EURO STOXX 50 Double Short (2x) Fund
This fund seeks to deliver the inverse of twice the daily percentage
change in the level of the Dow Jones EURO STOXX 50 index. (Note
that due to the compounding of daily returns, returns measured over
periods longer than one day may differ from twice the inverse of the
reference index return over that same longer period. That is, the
performance of a leveraged or inverse ETF over a period of time is
path dependent. This leveraged short ETF allows investors with a
bearish view to double their exposure. Maximum loss is limited to the
investor’s initial investment. It is suitable only for sophisticated
investors who understand leverage, compounded daily returns and the
possible magnified losses.
1.11 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Structured ETFs
Structured ETFs are appealing compared to other investment products

in certain areas. However, they are not without drawbacks. Do note
the advantages and disadvantages as mentioned below.
(a) Advantages
(i) Diversification: ETFs track the performance of a market index.
Investing in ETF means that the investors are automatically
diversified across the entire market.
(ii) Low Cost: ETFs are passively managed. The fund management
fees are lower than those for actively managed funds. Direct
distribution cost is also lower as compared to unlisted funds.
(iii) Reduced Tracking Error: Tracking error is the biggest
disadvantage for index funds. However, by using swap
agreements, synthetic ETFs can more precisely track the
movement of the index.
(iv) Access To More Exotic Markets: ETFs provide retail investors
access to markets (traditionally accessible only to institutional
investors) such as commodities, foreign equity markets, and
non-deliverable currencies.
(v) Liquidity: Marketmakers provide intraday liquidity. Investors

can buy and sell ETFs on the market every trading day just like
trading stocks.
(vi) Realtime Price Discovery: Price information is provided to the
market in realtime. By comparison, unlisted fund prices are, at
best, published once a day.
(b) Disadvantages
(i) Tracking Errors: Fund performance, as measured by the
underlying index, is affected by tracking error. While the
tracking errors may be minimised by using synthetic replication
methods, there are still residual tracking errors, preventing the
ETFs from fully replicating the performance of the indexes that
they are designed to track.
(ii) Counterparty Risk: The use of swap and derivative
counterparties introduces additional counterparty risk for swap
transaction involved.
(iii) Expenses: The cost associated with using derivatives in a
structured ETF contributes to tracking errors.
(iv) Collateral Risk: In case of default of the swap counterparty, the
value of the fund investments, e.g. basket of stocks held by
the ETF under synthetic replication, may not be correlated to
that of the underlying index tracked by the ETF. Thus, the
collateral is commonly used to mitigate counterparty risk.
However, the value of collateral may be below the exposure
when the collateral is exercised for two reasons: (1) the
exposure may not have been collateralised at 100% in the first
place; and (2) the value of collateral may have been
deteriorated.
1.12 What Types Of Investors Would Invest In Structured ETFs?
Investing in ETFs is a cost-efficient way of gaining diversified exposure

to specific countries, sectors or asset classes. ETFs can also be used to
access markets not easily accessible to investors, such as the Indian
market which is closed to foreign investors.
Investors who want their investments to keep pace with market

movements will find the low cost structure of ETFs attractive. Investors
with high liquidity requirements will also find ETFs an appealing short-
term cash management vehicle.
1.13 When Are Structured ETFs Unsuitable For Investors?
ETFs do not aim to outperform the index. The ETF manager follows a
pre-disclosed investment rule and has limited discretion to deviate if the
strategy does not perform. Investors who believe in active stock-
picking will not find the passive management style of ETFs attractive.
Structured ETFs have higher counterparty risks as compared to cash-

based ETFs. Investors who do not wish to take on the additional risks
for the same index-based returns may wish to avoid synthetic ETFs.
As a general rule, investors should not buy products that they do not
understand. If an investor has difficulty in understanding a particular
structured ETF, then it is not suitable for him.
1.14 Common Examples Of Structured ETFs
There are many ETFs listed on the SGX, in four broad categories,
namely equities, commodities, fixed income and money market.
Majority of them are synthetics. There are designated marketmakers for
each ETF.
Equity ETFs form the bulk of the ETFs. They follow a country or a
region theme, i.e. China, India, Vietnam, Russia, Asia Pacific, Europe,
Emerging Markets, etc. MSCI is the most common benchmark used:
MSCI World, MSCI Taiwan, MSCI Asia Pacific ex Japan, etc.
Example: A Structured ETF Involving The Use Of Return Swap

Agreements
Investment Objective
To provide investors with enhanced returns over Singapore money
market rates and with potential income distribution.
Investment Approach
The Fund will invest in:
Short-term cash or floating rate bonds and / or money market
instruments, denominated in Singapore dollars or hedged into
Singapore dollars, using currency forwards, swaps or options.
Total return swaps, providing a return linked to the performance of
an equity pair strategy.
Equity Pair Strategy

Pairs of one overvalued stock and one undervalued stock in the same
industry sector are identified. A long position is taken on the
undervalued stock anticipating an upward correction in price, and a
short position on the overvalued stock in equal amounts to maintain a
neutral industry exposure. The performance of this long / short
portfolio is used as a benchmark for the swap agreements. It is not
part of the Fund’s assets. The manager of this long / short portfolio is
a third-party investment manager, independent of the fund’s manager.
Total Return Swaps

The Fund enters into return swap agreements with counterparties of
minimum credit rating. The counterparty will pay to the Fund the
actual returns from the equity pair strategy, net of the fees and
charges payable on the long / short portfolio.
Key Risk Factors

Counterparty Risk: One or more of swap counterparties may
default, resulting in losses to the Fund.
Expenses: The returns from the swaps may be negative if fees and
charges of the long / short portfolio more than offset the paired
performance.
Foreign Exchange Risk: Fluctuation in exchange rates and the cost
of currency hedges, if any, may affect the performance of the
Fund.
Market Risk: The success of the equity pair strategy depends on
general market movement, and the long / short portfolio manager’s
ability to stock-pick.
1.15 Governance
There are dual levels of governance for ETFs. At the primary market
level, the fiduciary obligations of the trustee and fund manager as
discussed in Chapter 4 will apply.
At the secondary market level, the listing and trading of ETFs are
subject to the stock exchange’s oversight. This includes:
(a) meeting the disclosure requirements at the initial public offering;
(b) following exchange’s trading rules; and
(c) providing ongoing disclosure information to the market to maintain
market transparency.
1.16 ETFs As A Tool For Wealth Management
(a) Cash Management

Assuming an uptrend market, an investor’s investable cash can be
invested in an ETF on a short term basis. With the liquidity of an
ETF, the investor is able to sell the ETF quickly and use the
proceeds for other purposes. Caution as to be taken, as the
investor may receive lesser than the initial capital after taking into
consideration of the fees and charges. In a downtrend market, the
investor may also suffer capital loss on the sale of the ETF.
Example
Mr Ang has S$20,000 to invest in the stock market. He views

that India market will grow significantly and believes that the
stocks of two local banks have good potential in the next five
years. However, he needs a month to examine these stocks in
detail before investing. Hence, he first invests the S$20,000 in an
Indian ETF. In this way, he gains from the growth of the Indian
market while taking the time to analyse the individual stocks.
When Mr Ang is certain that the time is right, he sells his ETF
units and buys the stocks of either of the local banks or both.
(b) Strategic Holding

ETF provides a cost-efficient and diversified exposure to specific
geographic locations, asset classes (equities, bonds, commodities,
etc) or industry sectors, depending on these underlying exposures.
An ETF can also be used to access markets where it is costly or
not easily accessible to investors.
Example 1
Mr Beng has set aside S$10,000 for investment. He prefers to

diversify his investments rather than putting all his money into
one or two stocks. He is considering a unit trust, but the
expenses are high. He decides to invest in a Taiwan ETF which
allows instant exposure to Taiwan companies with only the usual
brokerage commission of 0.25% to 0.5%, clearing fee of 0.4%,
and management expenses of 0.65% per annum.
Example 2
Mr Cheng has set aside S$10,000 for investment. After

examining the various stock markets in Asia, he believes that the
China economy will register strong growth in the next five years.
He calls his broker, but discovers that there is limited access to
stocks in China companies. He decides to invest in a China ETF,
which tracks the index that represents the China stock market.
(c) Tactical Trading

The liquidity and ease of trading make an ETF a convenient vehicle
to seize emerging investment opportunities.
Example
Latest news has reported that a civil war has broken out in a
country in this region and geo-political tension has reached a new
high. Mr Deng believes that the price of the GLD ETF will rise
quickly, as such news will normally drive gold prices up. He buys
1,000 units of this ETF at US$155 each. Five days later, he sells
them for US$160, making a profit of US$5,000 before
commissions and fees.
(d) Hedging
ETFs can be used for hedging purposes. Depending on the
investor’s portfolio, ETFs can be used to partially or fully hedge a
portfolio to protect against market volatility.
Example
Mr Eng has US dollar investments and is worried about the

weakening of the US dollar. As gold generally has a strong
negative correlation with the US dollar, he decides to buy the GLD
ETF as a hedge against the possible depreciation of the US dollar.
If the US dollar depreciates, the value of his USD investments
comes down, but that of his investments in the GLD ETF goes up,
preserving his overall portfolio value.
(e) Core-satellite Investments

For an investment portfolio, ETFs can be used as a core investment
in a core-satellite investment strategy. Investors buy ETFs as a core
portion of their portfolio, since ETFs provides instant, cost-efficient
diversification. The remainder of the portfolio is invested directly in
the satellite investments made up of specific securities, to generate
returns that potentially outperform the market.
Example
Mr Fong has S$200,000 for investment and wants to allocate his

funds in different asset classes. He intends to allocate 60% of all
funds into the core investments, and 40% of the funds into
particular stocks that he thinks will outperform the market.
To build his core investments, Mr Fong invests S$120,000

equally in the following three ETFs: Singapore Bond ETF, MS
Emerging Asia ETF and MS World ETF. To build his satellite
investments, he invests S$20,000 each in two Investment Trusts.
He also invests S$10,000 each in four blue-chip companies.
1.17 After Sales
Investors in ETFs have real-time access to market prices through the

stock exchange. Market price is affected by market forces and does not
always closely match the underlying fund’s NAV. Information on the
NAV of the fund is made available on the manager’s website.
2. HEDGE FUNDS
2.1 What Is A Hedge Fund?
There is no unified definition of hedge funds. The MAS considers a

fund to be a hedge fund if it uses leverage, short selling, arbitrage,
derivatives, or invests in non-mainstream asset classes. However, the
MAS may also take into account other factors as may be appropriate. A
structured hedge fund is a subset of hedge funds that uses derivatives
to achieve its risk-return profile.
Despite the lack of universal definition, there are generally recognised

characteristics of a hedge fund, although exhibition of one or more of
these characteristics does not necessarily make the fund a hedge fund.
For example, performance of hedge funds is usually measured in terms
of absolute returns. However, an absolute return fund is not always a
hedge fund. Often, a hedge fund is a self-proclaimed status. Here are
the commonly-considered characteristics of a hedge fund.
(a) Absolute Return: A hedge fund usually aims for a risk-adjusted

absolute return, rather than outperforming a standard market
benchmark.
(b) Flexibility In Investments: The investment mandate for a hedge

fund does not contain many investment restrictions, if any at all. A
hedge fund can invest in nearly any investment instrument that
exists, in any market in the world. (In reality, even hedge fund
managers do not stray too far from their areas of expertise, despite
the wide mandate.)
A hedge fund can also take short positions, which is often

expressly prohibited in traditional mandates. Many but not all hedge
funds invest in derivatives. Two reasons for the use of derivatives
are: (i) to reduce risk; and (ii) to leverage.
In the revised CIS Code most recently amended in August 2014,

the MAS has subjected short selling to a number of regulations.
Short selling by schemes is strictly prohibited unless they comply
with these regulations.
(c) Leverage: The degree of leverage varies according to the

investment strategy. According to a UK regulator’s survey, the
extent of leverage ranges from 50% for managed futures strategy
to 800% for fixed income arbitrage, averaging 328% across all

strategies.3 Leverage may also vary over time.
(d) Performance Based Fee: Hedge fund managers are paid a

percentage of the achieved performance in addition to a percentage
of AUM (assets under management). For example, “2 + 20” is a
typical fee structure for hedge fund managers, under which the
managers get paid 2% of AUM, plus 20% of performance. A
"hurdle rate” of return must be achieved, or any previous losses
recouped, before the performance fee is paid. This performance
based fee structure gives the manager incentive to achieve
maximum returns. In many instances, a high watermark is applied
to ensure that past losses are recouped before any performance
fees are earned.
(e) Liquidity: Hedge funds are generally less liquid than traditional
funds. Most allow redemptions only on a quarterly basis. Some
hedge funds have minimum lock-up periods.
(f) Lack Of Transparency: Since the days of Alfred Jones, the hedge
fund industry has been characterised by a lack of transparency,
justified on the premise that managers need secrecy to implement
their trading strategies. Owing to increased participation by
institutional investors who typically require a high degree of
transparency, hedge funds are starting to provide more information
to clients. Hedge funds targeting at retail investors are subject to
requirements in the Code on Collective Investment Schemes in
Singapore, including ongoing disclosure requirements.
2.2 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Hedge Funds
Two notions usually pop into people’s minds when they hear of the
phrase hedge funds: high risk; and double-digit returns. Neither may be
true, depending on the strategy.
3
“Assessing possible sources of systemic risk from hedge funds: A report on the findings of the
hedge fund as counterparty survey and hedge fund survey”, UK Financial Services Authority,
February 2010.
Pros and cons of investing in a hedge fund follow the fund’s

characteristics:
Characteristic Advantage Disadvantage

Absolute Creates certainty The absolute return target may be
return to return lower than market benchmark
expectation. when market surges.
Investment Allows the The use of leverage, short selling
flexibility manager to pursue and derivatives introduces
all possible additional risks.
investment
opportunities, The manager’s freedom to invest
whereby in almost anything makes risk
maximising the assessment difficult on the part
return potential. of the investors.
Leverage Allows the Exposes the investors to higher
manager to risks.
maximise returns.
Performance Links the Encourages managers to pursue
based fee manager’s risky returns. (This may be
financial reward to partially mitigated by the fact that
his performance. the hedge fund managers have
significant portions of their
personal wealth invested in the
funds that they manage. This is
generally not the case of
traditional funds.)
Lack of Relieves the Investors are not able to
liquidity manager from immediately exit the fund when
short-term cash market starts to slide.
flow concerns for
better long-term Sometimes, the long lock-up
performance. period also hampers liquidity.
Lack of Keeps competitors Investors may not have sufficient
transparency from following the or timely information to make
same strategy. investment decisions.
(Retail hedge funds in Singapore
are subject to ongoing disclosure
requirements.)
2.3 What Types Of Investors Would Invest In A Hedge Fund?
Investors should invest only in products that they understand. Those

who consider investing in hedge funds should have the confidence that
they:
understand the investment strategy of each fund;
are comfortable with the degree of leverage involved;
recognise the risk factors, and most important of all; and

can afford to lose the principal of investments.
The returns on successful hedge funds can be impressive, but not all
hedge funds are successful. Investors considering hedge funds should
adopt a diversified portfolio, with hedge funds being one component.
2.4 When Are Hedge Funds Unsuitable For Investors?
Hedge funds typically have high minimum subscription amounts,

making them inaccessible to many retail investors.
Because hedge funds usually employ sophisticated financial instrument

to carry out complex trading strategies, inexperienced investors or
those with little financial expertise may find it difficult to understand
hedge funds. They should refrain from investing in something that they
do not understand.
There are tens of thousands of hedge funds around the world. There
are new ones set up or terminated almost every day. Retail investors
who do not have the time or resources to keep up with research and
analysis of hedge funds should consider fund of hedge funds (FoHF),
where the manager of FoHF performs the function of hedge fund
selection, portfolio diversification, and manager performance
monitoring.
2.5 Common Examples Of Hedge Funds
Hedge funds are typically classified by their investment “styles” or

strategies. Some of the common ones are mentioned below.
Relative value, which seeks to reduce market risk and generate a
profit, regardless of the direction of the market. A relative value fund
achieves its goal by offsetting long and short positions in related
stocks, bonds and other types of securities.
Long / short equity, which takes long positions in equities that are
expected to go up and short positions in equities that are expected
to go down. This is different from the relative value strategy, where
the long / short positions are taken on related stocks to create a
hedge.
Global Macro, which aims to profit from changes in global
economies, typically brought about by shifts in government policies
that impact interest rates. These in turn affect currency, stock and
bond markets. Leverage and derivatives are used to accentuate the
impact of market movements.
Event-driven, which focuses on opportunities created by corporate
actions or catalytic changes, such as mergers and takeovers,
restructuring, reorganisations, spin-offs, asset sales, liquidations,
bankruptcy and many others.
Distressed assets, which buy equity, debt or other assets at deep

discounts of companies in or facing bankruptcy or reorganisation.
Profits from the market’s lack of understanding of the true value of
the deeply discounted assets, and also from the fact that many
institutional investors cannot own below investment grade assets.
Convertible bond arbitrage, which exploits (i.e. arbitrages) the pricing
differences between convertible bonds and the underlying stocks.
Through complex modelling and analysis, the manager identifies and
buys undervalued convertible securities, and shorts the underlying
stocks.
Multi-strategy, which employs various strategies simultaneously to
realise short- and long-term gains. It allows the manager to
overweight or underweight different strategies to best capitalise on
current investment opportunities.
Short-sell funds are among the riskier funds because they take bets
on market downturns by selling securities that they believe are
overvalued. The investor does not own the shares sold, but instead
borrows them from a broker in anticipation that the share price will
fall and that the shares may be bought later at a lower price to
replace those borrowed from the broker earlier. As you know, short-
selling has unlimited risk.
It should be noted that investors tend not to invest in short sellers

on a stand-alone basis. Rather, short-sellers tend to be viewed in a
portfolio context where their addition serves as a hedging tool, or
portfolio “insurance”.
Fixed-income arbitrage funds involve taking long and short positions
in bonds and other interest-rate-sensitive securities. In the USA, this
strategy is often implemented through mortgage-backed bonds and
other mortgage derivative securities.
Index arbitrage funds buy or sell baskets of stocks or other
securities, and take counter positions in related index futures
contracts or options, to capture differentials due to inefficiencies in
the market. Unfortunately, computerised trading and the massive
liquidity of modern markets have conspired to increase the efficiency
of index pricing and, therefore, reduce the potential for profits from
this strategy. Very few fund managers participate in the index
arbitrage market.
Arbitrage on closed-end funds, like stock index arbitrage, involves
the buying or selling of baskets of stocks, which replicate the
holdings of closed-end mutual funds. The key to the process is
identifying closed-end mutual funds that are trading at prices
substantially different from their net asset value and will correct to a
more normal valuation in the future. Closed-end mutual funds are
less liquid than indexes and less transparent as to their holdings.
Therefore, they are less efficient and present greater opportunity,
but also greater potential risk than index arbitrage. Closed-end fund
arbitrage is rarely practised as a stand-alone strategy.
Equity market-neutral funds invest in a range of equity and equity-

derivative securities using complicated quantitatively intensive
models designed to hedge away virtually all market risks.
Risk arbitrage (also called merger arbitrage) funds take a long
position in the stock of a company being acquired in a merger,
leveraged buyout, or takeover and a simultaneous short position in
the stock of the acquiring company. If the takeover fails, this
strategy may result in large losses.
Special situations funds are similar to distressed securities and risk
arbitrage funds, but they tend to focus on new or under-followed
areas of opportunity, such as emerging market debt, depressed
stock, impending (i.e. unannounced) mergers / acquisitions,
reorganisations, and emerging bad news that may temporarily
devalue stock prices. Leverage is usually not used. The nature of
such investments involves greater volatility than other event-driven
strategies.
Sector funds use a top-down approach to invest long and short in
the companies of specific sectors of the economy. Examples of
sectors include technology companies, financial institutions,
healthcare and biotech companies, electrical utility companies, real
estate investment trusts (REITs), entertainment and communications
companies, gold stocks, and energy companies.
2.6 Guaranteed Hedge Funds
These funds work like their retail cousins. They may invest a high
proportion of their assets (say 70%) in bonds that mature to provide
the capital preservation, and the rest of the moneys (30%) are invested
in a selected hedge fund, or indirectly through a fund of hedge funds to
provide the upside kicker in returns.
Guaranteed hedge funds have a fixed maturity of typically five to ten

years. If you invest in one of these funds, be prepared to stay on the
course. Asking for your money back after two years will cost you in
terms of likely capital losses and redemption fees.
They differ from retail guaranteed funds in two main ways. Firstly, the
bonds invested intend to be higher-yielding and less than investment
grade quality. While retail funds may have 90% in bonds, guaranteed
hedge funds may have 80% or less because of higher yields.
Secondly, the guaranteed hedge funds can make use of leverage. For
example, a guaranteed hedge fund that has borrowed 40% can be
invested at 140% of its capital: 80% into bonds; and 60% into
derivatives. Retail guaranteed funds in comparison may have only the
remaining 20% to invest in derivatives.
The guarantee does not come free of course. With a reduction in risk,
there will inevitably be a trade off in investment returns.
The very simple guaranteed funds invest a high proportion of their

assets (say 80%) in zero coupon bonds or similarly discounted
instruments. At maturity of the guaranteed fund, the zero coupon
bonds will be designed to realise around, say 110% of the initial capital
invested. These yields are slightly higher, as these zero coupons usually
have credit guarantees from the bank or insurance company. The zero
bond portfolios can use more aggressive fixed income instruments. The
fund promoters will, of course, hope that the 20% of the assets
invested in hedge funds will have grown at a significantly faster rate,
so that the investor is left with a reasonable return on their investment.
Further developments of this concept are those guaranteed funds

where the risk reduction is facilitated through the purchase of a
derivative instrument. Similar to the traditional guaranteed funds, the
bulk of the funds’ assets are again held in zero coupon bonds, with the
balance of the assets being used to purchase a call option or a series of
options. The value of the derivative instruments will be determined
relative to the performance of a hedge fund, or fund of hedge funds
designed to provide the investor with the required level of exposure.
(a) The Cost Of Guaranteed Funds

Nothing in this world comes free, and the guarantee has three key
costs. The first will be the direct additional costs associated with
the guarantee. These direct additional costs may include the cost
of a call option, the cost of the guarantee, the legal cost of setting-
up the vehicle, and any additional administrative costs associated
with the running of the fund. These costs can be substantial. While
they will all be subject to ongoing scrutiny during an annual audit,
this audit will not determine whether they represent good value for
the investor.
There may also be a lack of transparency on some aspects. If a

derivative is used, it is not likely to be a freely tradable instrument.
Therefore, it may not be possible to accurately determine whether
the fund has paid a fair price for its size of exposure. The issuer of
the derivative is also likely to be a related party of the manager
offering the fund. It must be assumed that the issuer of the
derivative is in the business of making money. Therefore, the
issuer will be making a profit of some sort through the writing of
the derivative.
The second key cost will be the lost investment opportunity. With
potentially large amounts of the fund’s capital being locked up in
debt securities, while this is providing protection for the investors’
capital, this proportion will not be providing the absolute returns
that hedge fund investors will typically be seeking. When assessing
whether the fund on offer is providing 100% principal protection, it
is important to understand that this extent of protection is limiting
on upside participation.
The final key cost to consider will be the additional management

fees that the investor will bear. The guaranteed fund will no doubt
be charging a management fee. Where the fund is investing in

hedge funds, these underlying funds will also be charging
management fees and possibly performance fees as well. Where
the fund is investing in a fund of hedge funds, there may be three
layers of fees, sometimes referred to as “triple dipping”.
If you consider that most guaranteed products are linked to the

performance of multi-manager funds, which offer a form of
portfolio “insurance” by spreading their assets over a variety of
investment strategies, it is important to weigh up all these costs
when determining whether the guarantee is worth paying for.
(b) How Good Is The Guarantee?

Any guarantee is only as good as the quality of the guarantee
provider. For an investor to gain ongoing comfort on the value of
the guarantee provided, they will need to monitor the credit quality
of the guarantee provider, typically an investment bank, on an
ongoing basis. Furthermore, the level of reliance that an investor is
placing on this guarantee will necessarily be dependent on the
mechanism used by the fund provider, to provide the risk reduction
required by the guarantor. Therefore, a mechanism for balancing
the assets in which the fund’s capital is invested may provide a
superior type of guarantee. However, the investor will also need to
consider what forms of debt security investments are used. If these
are fixed income notes issued by the same group that is issuing the
guarantee or has written the derivative, then the number of baskets
in which the fund’s assets are being diversified across is
significantly reduced.
(c) Conclusion On Guaranteed Hedge Funds

Guaranteed hedge funds clearly have a useful part to play in the
world of alternative investments. Those participants who are
entering this investment class for the first time will be tempted by
being able to actively participate, without taking a level of risk that
their beneficiaries will be nervous about. However, they will need
to approach these investments with their eyes open. Also, they will
need to weigh up the additional direct and opportunity costs
associated with these guaranteed funds and the risks that are still
present, alongside the potential returns.
2.7 Example Of Two Strategies
(a) Convertible Arbitrage Strategy

By buying convertible bonds and simultaneously short-selling the
underlying stocks, a neutrally hedged position is created that is
immune to market fluctuations. If the price of the underlying stock
falls, the investment is protected by the short position. If the stock
price rises, the position is enhanced by the underlying stock of the
convertible.
A convertible bond is a bond which can be converted into the

company's common stock. You can exercise the convertible bond
and exchange the bond into a predetermined amount of shares in
the company. The conversion ratio varies from bond to bond. For
example, a conversion ratio of 100:1 means that each bond (with a
S$1000 par value) exchanges for 100 shares of stock.
Convertibles offer a lower yield than a regular bond because there

is a price to pay for the option to convert the shares into stock.
They are an excellent choice for investors looking for capital
appreciation, while still protecting their original investment in the
bond.
The price of a convertible bond cannot go lower than the market

value of the bond regardless of the price of the stock. This low
point of a convertible bond is called its “bond investment value”
which reflects the value of the same company bond, if not
convertible.
The term arbitrage refers to the trading strategy of identifying

assets which are not efficiently priced by the market in comparison
to prices of other related assets. To understand how it works in the
case of convertible bonds, it is best to go through an example.
Suppose you buy a 3% convertible bond maturing in one year at

S$1,000. It is exchangeable for 100 shares of non-dividend-paying
common stock, currently trading at S$10 per share. When the price
of a convertible bond (S$1,000) equals the price of buying the
shares directly (100 shares X S$10 = S$1,000), we have a
condition called “bond price parity.” An arbitrage strategy may
hedge against this long convertible bond, with a short position of
50 shares of underlying common stock at S$10 per share. Pricing
inefficiencies between these two related securities, as we will see
below, allow for profits both when the stock price rises and falls.
Adding to gains on the downside is the fact that convertible bonds
can fall only in value as low as their "bond investment value" - the
value of the same company bond, if not convertible. In this case,
let's say the investment value is S$900.
Here are three return scenarios:
Return When No Change In Stock Price:

Interest earned on S$1,000 convertible bond S$30.00
(3% x S$1,000)
Interest earned on S$500 short sale proceeds S$10.00
(2% x S$500)
Fees paid to lender of common stock –S$20.00
(4% x S$500)
Net cash flow S$20.00
Annual Return 2.00%
Return When 25% Increase In Stock Price:
Gain on convertible bond S$250.00
(100 shares x S$2.50 per share)
Loss on shorted stock –S$125.00
(3% x S$1,000)
(2% x S$500)
Fees paid to lender of common stock –S$20.00
(4% x S$500)
Annual Return 14.50%
Return When 25% Fall In Stock Price:
Loss on convertible bond (S$1,000 – S$900) –S$100.00
Gain on shorted stock S$125.00
(3% x S$1,000)
(2% x S$500)
Fees paid to lender of common stock (4% x –S$20.00
S$500)
Annual Return 4.50%
As this example shows, if a convertible bond arbitrage position is

properly constructed, it should profit not only from the bond
coupons and short rebate, but from changes up or down in the
underlying equity price. In other words, if the stock price drops, the
gain from the short common stock position should exceed the
corresponding loss on the long convertible bond. Likewise, if the
stock price rises, the gain on the long convertible position should
be greater than the accompanying loss on the short common stock
position.
Adding substantially to the upside can be leverage. Given the low-

risk nature of a convertible bond arbitrage, leverage is often an
attractive option to investors.
While a convertible bond arbitrage seems simple enough, small

investors will find it difficult to implement the strategy. The main
reason is timing. If you are 30 seconds too slow in executing a
trade, gains can quickly turn to losses. Furthermore, high brokers'
fees and brokers not paying interest earned on the proceeds of
short sales can also cut into profits.
(b) Risk / Merger Arbitrage Strategy

Risk (or merger) arbitrage is a strategy that delivers profits
regardless of the direction of equity markets. The strategy takes
advantage of expected price movements that occur after a merger
or acquisition offer is announced.
Here is an example of how it works. After a company announces

its intent to acquire another company, the price of the target
company's stock predictably goes up, although usually not to the
full offering price. Instead, because of the risk of the deal not
closing on time or at all, the target company's stock will sell at a
discount to its value at the merger's closing, this discount
increasing with the expected length of time until closing and the
perceived risk of the deal.
Consider a hypothetical stock-for-stock transaction in which

Company A, with stock trading at S$105, offers one share of its
stock for each share of Company B stock, currently trading at
S$80. An investor looking to create an arbitrage profit will buy
Company B stock at, say, S$100, the price to which it has climbed
immediately after the merger announcement, and sell short
Company A stock at S$105 in an amount equal to the exchange
ratio - in this case, 1:1.
(Actually, in some instances, particularly in mega mergers, the

acquirer's stock price usually drops somewhat immediately after
the announcement, as shorting pressure pulls down the price; but
for this example, we will keep it at S$105.) As the merger date
draws nearer, this S$5 spread will narrow as the prices of
Company B and Company A stocks converge. When the spread
narrows, the investor's returns grow - for example, if Company B
stock rises to S$101 and Company A falls to S$104, the investor
earns S$1 on the long investment and S$1 on the short.
Once the merger is accomplished and Company B stock is

converted to Company A shares, the investor locks in the S$5
gain, regardless of the current price of Company A stock. (His
Company B shares are converted into Company A shares, which he
delivers to cover his short sale of Company A shares at S$105.) If
during the interim, the market has tumbled, sending Company A
stock down to S$80, the investor makes S$25 on the short sale of
Company A stock at S$105 minus the loss of S$20 on the
Company B shares for which he has paid S$100. (Though if a
market downturn causes Company A stock to fall significantly
before the merger closes, Company B may back out of the deal. As
a cover against a market downturn, some fund managers
supplement their merger arbitrage investments with put options on
the S&P Index, to enable them to lock in a sell price in the event
that the index craters.) In this way, the investment is buffered from
violent market swings.
The following table illustrates this scenario:
Merger Arbitrage Strategy: Buy one share of target Company B at

S$100; Short sell one share of acquirer Company A at S$105.
Gain (Loss) Gain (Loss)

Scenarios After On Long On Short Total Gain
Merger Position Of Position Of (Loss)
S$100 S$105
Rise in Company
A Stock to S$20 (S$15) S$5
S$120
Fall in Company
(S$20) S$25 S$5
A Stock to S$80
With the average merger and acquisition transaction taking four

months to complete from the initial announcement, a 5% profit as
illustrated above will translate into a 15% annualised gain. Also,
with the use of leverage or borrowing, the returns can be much
higher.
The variable here, of course, is the risk of the merger falling

through. In this case, the stock price of the targeted Company B is
likely to return to its original price of $S80 or even lower, if it was
assumed by the market that the deal fell through because of some
inherent problems at Company B. The result would be a loss of
S$20 or more on the purchase of Company B stock at S$100 after
the deal was announced. Furthermore, had Company A stock
dropped after the initial announcement, its share price would likely
to return to its former price of S$105 after the transaction was
called off, as all the short sellers covered their shorts. Any investor,
who shorted the stock at less than S $105 then, would incur a loss
on the short investment on top of the loss that he would incur on
the Company B shares.
However, historically, the vast majority of friendly acquisition offers

that have been announced are completed. Only about 3% of
"good" transactions "break”. In addition, through diversification
across many such deals, fund managers are able to minimise the
impact of one deal falling through. Still, as a hedge against
collapsed deals, some fund managers supplement their long
positions in the target company with puts on the company's stock -
but only when the spread is such that the potential profit well
offsets the cost of buying the puts.
As compared to the uncertainty of playing the currently volatile

equity market, arbitrage investments, such as those described
above in companies undergoing mergers or acquisitions, can result
in relatively consistent returns. The risk of a merger or acquisition
falling through is one that a good fund manager can be expected to
foresee through strong due diligence.
According to a New York-based hedge fund manager David Liptak,

"Merger arbitrage returns are largely uncorrelated to the overall
movement of the stock market. And the risks are much more
managed because we're talking about anticipating probable
outcomes of specific transactions versus predicting what are often
far more random variables when making directional investments."
Merger arbitrage received some negative press in the late 1980s

when Ivan Boesky bought stock in companies before the merger
announcements using inside information. But merger arbitrage is
about capitalising on announced transactions. It starts when a
news release appears on a trading screen, such Bloomberg or
Reuters, announcing that a bidder wishes to buy the stock in a
company.
Merger and acquisition activities have grown tremendously over the

past few years, giving these managers and analysts many more
deals from which to choose, and thus the ability to be even more
selective in finding winners.
2.8 Governance
Owing to the more aggressive investment strategies typically pursued

by hedge funds, the Code on CIS imposes a minimum subscription level
to discourage participation by retail investors. The minimum is
S$100,000 for single-manager hedge funds, and S$20,000 for fund of
hedge funds, provided that the fund of hedge funds has diversification
as one of its key objectives.
2.9 After Sales
Prices of retail hedge funds are published in the newspapers. Investors

may also go to the respective manager’s or distributor’s website to
obtain the pricing information.
3. FUND OF FUNDS
3.1 What Is A Fund Of Funds?
An investment fund invests in securities. A fund of funds (FoF) invests

in other investment funds, called sub-funds. The role of the manager of
a FoF is to:
scour the markets globally for funds that can contribute positively to
the FoF;
decide on how much to invest in each sub-fund for optimal portfolio
allocation and diversification, within the parameters of the fund’s
investment strategy;
monitor the performance of each sub-fund to decide whether to
replace non-performing funds; and
prepare reports to the investors.
Similar to traditional funds, FoFs have specific asset class, geographic

focus, and investment theme. There are also specialty funds, such as
fund of hedge funds (FoHF). A FoF that invests in structured funds is a
structured FoF. Not all FoFs are structured funds.
3.2 Advantages And Disadvantage Of Fund Of Funds
Diversification is the main advantage of investing in a FoF. In terms of

degree of diversification, investing in a single-manager fund achieves
greater risk diversification as compared to holding a small range of
securities directly. Investing in a FoF achieves even greater risk
diversification as compared to investing in a single-manager fund.
In addition to diversification, the advantages of investing in a FoF

include:
professional expertise in fund selection;
access to specialty managers that are generally not known or
available to retail investors;
full time professional monitoring of fund performance; and
greater negotiation power for lower management fees in sub-funds.
It is apparent from the FoF structure that its main disadvantage is that
there are two layers of management fees: at the FoF level; and at the
sub-funds level. In view of this, the expense ratio of a FoF is typically
higher as compared to a single manager fund.
3.3 What Types Of Investors Would Invest In A Fund Of Funds?
Despite the higher expenses, FoFs are useful to investors who do not
have time to monitor fund performance, or for those who are interested
in specialty investment areas (such as hedge funds and private equity),
but do not have sufficient experience or knowledge to invest in such
niche areas on their own. In deciding whether a FoF is suitable, the

investor should weigh the additional cost against the benefits of
investing in a FoF.
3.4 When Are Funds Of Funds Unsuitable For Investors?
The manager of a FoF must add value to an investor, to justify for the
additional costs incurred. If an investor has modest objectives for his
investments, the typically higher expenses of a FoF may unnecessarily
erode the correspondingly modest returns. For example, if an investor is
merely interested in keeping pace with the market, he can invest very
inexpensively in index funds, either listed or unlisted. It is not necessary
for him to invest in a FoF, as there is no active investment management
involved. On the other hand, if an investor is interested in an aggressive
investment strategy, such as leveraged hedge funds, he can do well by
seeking a reputable FoHF, as there is a high level of investment
expertise and management involved, to well justify the additional layers
of fees.
3.5 Common Examples Of Fund Of Funds
A typical global diversified portfolio fund of funds may have the

following structure:
Global
Investor Fund
Global Equity Global Fixed US High Commodities

Fund Income Fund Yield Fund Fund
An investor invests at the main fund (Global Investor Fund) level, and
the manager allocates the investments into each of the sub-funds in
accordance with the investment objectives of the fund.
Each sub-fund is a stand-alone fund, in which investors may invest

directly, subject to regulatory requirements. For example, the sub-funds
will need to be individually authorised and recognised for direct
distribution in Singapore.
A fund of funds may have a special investment theme, e.g. long / short
equity. Then, the main fund may consist of a collection of sub-funds,
each specialises in long / short strategy, chosen for their geographic
focus and performance track record.
3.6 After Sales
The manager of an FoF depends on the managers of the sub-funds to

provide the NAV of the respective sub-funds, before he can complete
the valuation of the main fund.
The prices are published in the newspapers each day, and are also
available on the respective manager’s or distributor’s website.
4. FORMULA FUNDS
4.1 What Is A Formula Fund?
A formula fund is one where the fund’s targeted return is determined

by a formula. The formula may be quite straight forward, such as a
return of capital plus 80% of the performance (up or down) of the Hang
Seng index. The formula can also be complex, involving multiple
indexes and their relative performance.
A formula fund is typically closed-ended with fixed tenure, and is

passively managed.
The capital protection element (if any) of a formula fund is provided by

investment in low-risk fixed income instruments, such as zero-coupon
bonds. The upside potential is provided by options.
4.2 Advantages And Disadvantages Of Formula Funds
The formula presents a tangible and easily understood investment

objective to the investors. The passive investment style means that the
fund management fee is lower as compared to more actively managed
funds.
On the other hand, there is a danger that investors may mistake the
formula as guarantee, when in fact it is merely a target. While the
investments in a formula fund are structured to deliver the formulaic
returns, the fund is subject to counterparty risks which may prevent the
fund from achieving its investment targets.
4.3 What Types Of Investors Would Invest In Formula Funds?
Less sophisticated investors or those with little prior experience with

structured products may find formula funds easier to understand. They
may use formula funds to gain familiarity and confidence in investing in
structured products.
4.4 When Are Formula Funds Unsuitable For Investors?
Regardless of the investment instrument, an investor must evaluate the

risk / return profile, to ensure that the risk is within his risk tolerance,
and the return is commensurate with the risk taken. Consider a five-
year formula fund, which targets to deliver return of capital plus 90%
of STI performance at maturity.
It is not possible for this formula fund to provide 100% STI

performance AND the return of capital. The cost of providing a capital
protection is covered by the “sacrifice” of 10% of the upside in STI. An
investor should consider whether the trade-off is an acceptable one.
Alternatively, the investor could invest in an ETF based on STI, without
any capital protection, to enjoy the full upside potential in STI, without
any downside protection, if he feels that the downside is within his risk
tolerance, given the five-year time frame.
6. Case Studies
Chapter
6 CASE STUDIES
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. Case Study 1 – Currency Income Fund
2. Case Study 2 – Fund Of Hedge Funds
KEY LEARNING POINT

understand structured funds through in-depth analysis of two case studies
This chapters discusses two structured funds, to illustrate how structured funds
work, and the risks to look out for. Both case studies are based on actual products
in the market. The names of the issuers, products, trustees, etc. have been
withheld or changed. However, all other information concerning product features,
structure, investment holdings, and performance is based on actual product
summaries and prospectuses.
1. CASE STUDY 1 – CURRENCY INCOME FUND
What Do The Documents What Does It Mean?

Say?
The investment objective of (1) Despite the all-encompassing
Currency Income Fund (the objective, there is a trade-off
“Fund”) is to seek to between income and growth. The
provide investors with: use of bank fixed deposit rate as
(a) regular income the investment benchmark (see
payouts; fund information in Section 1.2)
(b) capital growth; and indicates that the implied
(c) optimum risk-adjusted investment goal of this fund is
total return. quite modest.
The Fund invests in cash, (2) Although it is not explicitly stated

cash-equivalent, high in the investment strategy, the
quality bonds and other currency exposure of the fund
fixed income securities (see Section 1.3) suggests that
rated BBB- and above. The the Fund is invested in many
Fund enters into derivative different currencies and is
transactions linking to susceptible to FX risk.
indices which employ pre- (3) It is not clear from the investment
defined multi-currency strategy whether the Fund
interest rate arbitrage employs currency hedging to
strategies. mitigate FX risk.
(4) The use of derivatives makes this
Fund a structured fund.
1.2 Fund Information As At 31 May 2010
(a) What Do The Documents Say?

Investment Manager Best Asset Management Pte Ltd
Inception Date 23 January 2007
Fund Currency S$
Fund Size S$160.8 million
Minimum Investment S$5,000 (initial), S$2,000 (subsequent)
6. Case Studies
Initial Sales Charge 5.0%
Management Fee 1.5% per annum
Investment Benchmark 12-month S$ Fixed Deposit Rate
Financial Year End 31 December
Dealing / Pricing Daily / Forward single NAV price
Redemption Charge 5.0%
(b) What Does It Mean?

After deducting the upfront 5% sales charge, only S$950 is
invested in the Fund for every S$1,000 invested. Therefore, the
Fund needs to earn 6.95%1 for the investor to break-even after one
year, taking into account the initial sales charges and manager’s
fees alone, without regard to the transaction costs, audit fees and
other administrative expenses incurred by the Fund.
In addition, there is a redemption charge (sometimes called the

realisation charge) of 5%, represented by the bid-offer spread. It
requires exemplary performance to compensate the charges over the
short term.
1.3 Currency Exposure
The Fund held short positions mainly in Euro, Japanese Yen, Canadian
Dollar, and Swiss Franc as of 31 May 2010. It held long positions in
Australian Dollar, New Zealand Dollar, Norwegian Krone and other
Asian and South American currencies. If the Fund engages currency
hedging, the hedging cost may reduce performance. If the Fund does
not engage in currency hedging, the performance measured on SGD
basis is affected by the exchange rate fluctuation.
1
Total expenses per S$1,000 invested for the first year is S$65, consisting of initial sales charge of
S$50, and fund management fee of S$15. The remaining S$935 investment needs to earn 6.95%
to reach the initial investment amount of S$1,000.
Figure 6.1: Currency Exposure – Net Short And Long Position
The fund’s investments are in cash and fixed income securities rated
BBB– and above. (BBB– is the lowest rating for investment grade
instruments.) On the other hand, the performance benchmark is
Singapore dollar fixed deposit rate. The risk-return trade-off should be
carefully considered.
Performance is measured on bid-to-bid and offer-to-bid bases to

illustrate the impact of redemption charges on the fund performance.
1 3 6 1 3 Since
Month Months Months Year Years Inception
Offer-Bid -7.4% -2.6% -1.8% 3.2% -8.0% -5.1%
Bid-Bid -2.6% 2.5% 3.4% 8.6% -6.4% -3.6%
Benchmark 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 0.7% 0.7%
6. Case Studies
Figure 6.2: Performance Chart (Bid-to-Bid)
12-Month Fixed
Deposit Rate
Before the global financial crisis, the Fund appeared to have achieved
its investment goal of beating the fixed deposit rate. The Fund is
gradually recovering from the sharp downturn in 2008 since early
2009. In the one-year period ending 31 May 2010, the Fund realised a
decent 8.6% rate of return. However, measured on offer-to-bid basis,
the return is 3.2%, reflecting the effect of the bid-offer spread.
1.5 Risk Factors
The Fund is invested mainly in fixed income instruments. Therefore, the

main risk factors are interest rate risk and issuer credit risk. Owing to
investment in foreign currencies, the Fund is also susceptible to foreign
exchange risk.
2. CASE STUDY 2 – FUND OF HEDGE FUNDS
This case study involves a fund of hedge funds - Active Strategies Fund
(ASF). ASF is one of the sub-funds under an umbrella unit trust called
Alternative Investments. ASF is the only sub-fund currently.
ASF’s current investment policy is to invest in two other funds of

hedge funds, namely Multi-Strategy Fund and Natural Resources Fund.
ASF may choose to invest in additional or other funds in the future. The
two sub-funds in turn invest in other managers pursuing various
strategies.
The structure is illustrated in the following chart:
Alternative Investments (Umbrella Fund)
Active Strategies Fund (ASF)
Multi-Strategy Fund (MSF) Natural Resources Fund (NRF)
Equity Long Managers Energy Managers
Event Driven Managers Metal Managers
Equity Arbitrage Managers Forest Products Managers

….
Fixed Income Arbitrage Mgrs etc.
….
etc.
What Do The Documents Say? What Does It Mean?
The Active Strategies Fund (“ASF” (1) ASF is a USD-denominated

or the “Fund”) is an open-ended FoHF.
fund of hedge funds denominated in
(2) There are no material differences
USD, and constituted in Singapore.
between the two classes of
units. However, the SGD units
The Manager offers two classes of
are subject to FX risk and
units: SGD and USD.
additional currency hedging
cost.
The investment objective of the (3) The investment objective is
Fund is to achieve a long-term broadly phrased. The absence of
capital appreciation through a reference to capital preservation
diversification of investments with suggests that there is little to
multiple hedge fund managers who none downside protection.
adopt different investment
strategies, across different asset
classes.
6. Case Studies
What Do The Documents Say? What Does It Mean?
The current investment policy of the (4) ASF invests in two FoHFs. The
Fund is to invest in two performance of ASF depends on
Luxembourg-registered investment the ability of these sub-fund
companies: Multi-strategy fund managers to select managers.
(MSF) and Natural Resources Fund
(5) The fees and charges resulting
(NRF), collectively known as the
from this 3-layer structure may
Underlying Funds.
potentially, negatively affect
Fund performance.
Each of the Underlying Funds is a
fund of hedge funds, whose primary
objective is to achieve long-term
capital appreciation with moderate
volatility and risk.
MSF seeks to achieve attractive (6) MSF achieves diversification
absolute returns over a full market through investing in a number of
cycle with lower volatility. single-strategy managers. The
diversification across managers
MSF invests in portfolio managers aims to reduce performance
pursuing various alternative volatility over both bull and bear
investment strategies on a global markets.
basis. A maximum of 40% of MSF
assets may be managed pursuant to
the same strategy.
NRF invests at least two thirds of (7) NRF will do well if the loose
total assets in funds that invest in monetary polices around the
commodity futures and other world drive up commodities
commodity related financial prices.
instruments, in commodity based
(8) NRF will engage managers who
companies, and in commodity based
employ short-selling, arbitrage
economies using alternative
and leveraging techniques.
investment strategies.
(9) The use of futures contracts and
alternative investment strategies
in NRF and MSF makes the Fund
a structured fund.
2.2 Fund Information As At 30 September 2010
(a) What Do The Documents Say?

Investment Manager Active Asset Management Pte Ltd
Trustee TrustWorthy Trust Services Singapore Pte
Ltd
Inception Date 22 March 2004
Fund Currency USD. Two classes of units are offered:
USD and SGD
Fund Size USD16.5 million (USD & SGD classes
combined)
Minimum USD15,000 / SGD20,000 (initial),
Investment
USD500 / SGD1,000 (subsequent)
Initial Sales Charge Up to 5%, maximum 5%
Management Fee:
- ASF level Currently nil, maximum 3% p.a.
- Underlying level 1.25% p.a. of monthly average NAV, plus
5% performance fees.
Trustee’s Fee 0.075% p.a. (Singapore level)
Other Fees Each Underlying Fund is subject to a
shareholders’ service fee of 0.75% p.a.
Each underlying Fund may charge a
maximum 5.5% subscription fee in the
future.
Dealing / Pricing Monthly – last business day of the month
Dealing Deadline Subscription – 27th calendar day of the
month
Redemption – 9th calendar day of the month
NAV Prices USD1.272 / SGD1.112
Redemption Charge Currently nil, maximum 4%
(b) What Does It Mean?

Minimum Investment
The Code on CIS imposes a minimum subscription for single-
manager hedge funds, and fund of hedge funds of S$100,000
and S$20,000 respectively.
Management Fees
Being a FoF, there are two levels of management fees at the
ASF level, and at the sub-fund (i.e., MSF and NRF) level. In
addition, the managers of the funds in which MSF and NRF
6. Case Studies
invest also levy management fees. The fees at the sub-sub-fund

manager level are not required to be disclosed, but will affect
the Fund’s overall performance.
ASF currently does not charge a management fee, although it

has the discretion to charge a fee of up to 3% p.a.
Each of the sub-fund charges 1.25% p.a. based on monthly

average NAV, a 5% performance fee, and a 0.75% p.a.
shareholder service fee.
The total management fee is thus 2% of NAV plus 5%

performance fee, although it has a potential of reaching 5% plus
5%, not inclusive of the sub-sub-management fees.
Total Expenses
The prospectus disclosed that the expense ratio for the calendar
year 2008 was 0.14%. The prospectus included a statement
that the expense ratio did not include the Underlying Funds’
expense ratios, as there was no requirement for the Underlying
Funds’ expense ratios to be calculated or published. As such,
the expense ratio was understated, because the bulk of the
expenses were incurred at the sub-fund level. As a gauge of
what level of expenses might be more reasonably expected,
investors might want to look at other published data for
comparison. One such source of information available in
Singapore is the CPF Funds Reports (published by the CPF
Board) which showed an average expense ratio of 1.74% for
CPF-included unit trusts in the medium to high risk category. 2
The expense ratios for hedge funds are likely to be higher due to
more active investment management style. The expense ratios
for fund of hedge funds are likely to be even higher than those
for single hedge funds.
Remember that calculation of expense ratio excludes fees

directly borne by the investors, or transaction costs, such as
initial sales charges, brokerage commissions, interest on
borrowings (which is a likely for leveraging technique), tax
deducted at source, etc.
Dealing And Redemption

The Fund is valued once a month. Subscription and redemption
also occur once a month. Investor’s liquidity is restricted as a
result. Moreover, since ASF invests in MSF and NRF, the
liquidity of ASF is affected by the liquidity of the two sub-funds.
If MSF and NRF were valued on a quarterly basis, for example,
the effective frequency of dealing would be quarterly at the ASF
level. Therefore, it is important for investors to look to the
dealing frequency of sub-funds to determine the effective
2
Source: CPF Funds Report for the half year ended 30 June 2010.
liquidity of the master fund. In this case, both sub-funds are

valued at least monthly.
There are no redemption charges currently. However, the Fund

has the discretion to impose a charge of up to 4%.
Prices As At 30 September 2010

The unit prices were USD 1.272 and SGD 1.112. The difference
in the prices reflects the effect of FX risk (and the associated
cost of currency hedging, if any) to an investor investing in
foreign currency denominated assets.
Performance is measured on both gross and net of initial sales

expenses, for both the SGD units and USD units, over the periods of
three months, six months, one year, three years, five years, ten years
(not applicable for ASF) and since inception.
3 6 1 3 5 Since
Months Months Year Years Years Inception
S$ (Gross) 3.8% 0.3% 3.9% -4.3% 0.2% 1.7%
S$ (Net) -1.4% -4.7% -1.3% -5.9% -0.8% 0.9%
US$ (Gross) 4.1% 0.4% 4.1% -2.2% 2.5% 3.8%
US$ (Net) -1.1% -4.6% -1.1% -3.8% 1.4% 3.0%
The effect of the 5% initial sales charge is still felt after 6.5 years. It
dragged down the average performance by 0.8%, roughly 5% spread
over 6.5 years. For this reason, investors should take a long term view
on their unit trust investments, as frequent “churn” of investments is
detrimental to investment returns.
The Fund’s performance was mainly adversely impacted by the global

market meltdown in the years 2008 to 2009. The performance of the
SGD units is also adversely affected by the strong SGD. (The
prospectus made reference to currency hedges and associated hedging
costs, but did not disclose the exact extent of hedging. Investors who
are concerned about currency risks should ask the fund manager for a
full disclosure of the currency hedge strategy and the likely cost impact
on performance.)
2.4 Risk Factors
The prospectus lists three general risks in investing in ASF, 19 specific

risks in investing in hedge funds, and 32 risks associated with the
Underlying Funds. Full 14 pages of the prospectus were devoted to the
discussion of risk, and one page on risk management and controls
adopted by Active Asset Management Company.
6. Case Studies
Similar to the comments made in the previous case study, the adviser
should more succinctly highlight the main risks applicable to every
individual investor, based on his personal circumstances and risk
appetite. Perhaps, disclosure will improve with the new regulatory
requirement of the Product Highlights Sheet.
ACCESS TO ONLINE E-MOCK EXAMINATION [CLICK HERE]
You can also access the e-Mock examination via an active link
labeled as “E-MOCK EXAMINATION” in the Table of Contents
of the e-book Study Guide (PDF or PC version).
The e-Mock examination can only be accessed from devices with

an internet connection, and which are installed with
the latest version of Adobe Flash.
Module 8A: Collective Investment Schemes II (1st Edition)
Version Control Record
Version Date of Issue Effective Chapter Section Changes Made

Date*
1.0 1 Nov 2011 3 Jan 2012 N.A. N.A. First release.
1.1 20 Dec 2011 3 Jan 2012 Table of N.A Inserted active link to
Contents E-Mock Examination.
2 6.5 Last line, amended the
word from “structure”
to “structured”.
5 1.3 First line, replaced the
words “unit trusts”
with “investment
funds”.
Examination N.A Deleted Examination
Guide Guide, page 130 to
page 146.
1.2 10 Jan 2012 10 Jan 2012 2 4 Third paragraph last
sentence, added the
word “total” before the
word “return”.
Replaced the words
“would” with “will” and
the phrase “4.47% per
annum” with
“19.12%” respectively.
2 6.4 Third paragraph, fifth
line, replaced the term
“kick-out” with “knock-
out”.
2 6.5 Last sentence replaced
by ”In the examples in
Table 2.3, the
underlying funds are
structured notes.”
3 3 Page 50, first
paragraph, second
sentence, added “/
warrant” after the
phrase “A call option”.
Third sentence, added
“option /” before the
word “warrant”.
Date*
1.2 10 Jan 2012 10 Jan 2012 4 1.3 Page 74, last sentence
rephrased to,
“….investment
process. Other “perks”
such as travel,
accommodation and
entertainment are
excluded.”
5 1.16 Page 101, point (e) last
line of the example,
replaced the figure
“S$20,000” with
“S$10,000”.
5 2.7 Page 111, amended the
following figures in the
table:
Row 3: from “3%” to
“2%”
Row 12: from “20.00”
to “–S$20.00”
Row 21: from
“(45.00)” to
“S$45.00”.
6 2.4 Page 129, last line
replaced the word
“Highlight” with
“Highlights”.
N.A. N.A. Page 129, inserted an
active link to the E-
Mock Examination.
1.3 1 Feb 2012 1 Feb 2012 1 3.1 Deleted second bullet
point on “Dual-currency
investments”.
1.4 21 May 2012 23 Jul 2012 1 1.2 Page 5, Table 1.1,
replaced Structured
Deposits
Disadvantages.
1 3 Page 11, replaced the
last two paragraphs.
Date*
1.5 9 Jul 2012 10 Sep 2012 2 6.4 Third paragraph, fourth
line, replaced the term
“are automatically”
with “may be”.
Third paragraph, fifth
line, added the word
“when” after the word
“or”.
3 5 Second paragraph
added the sentence
“Interest adjustment…”
3 5 Page 68, replaced the
last row of the
example.
1.6 18 Feb 2013 18 Apr 2013 5 2.5 Page 106, replaced the
first sentence of the
seventh bullet point,
“Arbitrage on closed-
end funds, like…”
1.7 18 Apr 2013 18 Apr 2013 3 3.5 Page 58, amended the
figure in first
paragraph, last line:
“S$1” to “S$100”
1.8 12 Jun 2013 12 Aug 2013 3 3.4 Page 54, last
paragraph, replaced the
second and third
sentences: “The reason
for… in the short
term.”
1.9 1 Jul 2013 2 Sep 2013 3 3.4 Page 54, last
paragraph, replaced the
second and third
sentences: “Investors
write covered … in the
short term.”
1.10 1 Oct 2015 1 Dec 2015 4 2.2 Page 77, paragraph 1,
replaced the last
sentence: “In the
revised CIS … Fund-of-
Funds.”
4 2.3 Page 77, replaced last
paragraph: “Sociologist
and financial … the
fund’s gain.”
Date*
1.10 1 Oct 2015 1 Dec 2015 4 Footnote Page 77, replaced
4 footnote: “Source:
International …
06/basics.htm”
5 2.1(b) Page 102, paragraph 3,
replaced the first
sentence: “In the
revised … number of
regulations.”
* The relevant amendments will be applicable to examinations conducted after the stated
effective date.
Singapore College of Insurance
9 Temasek Boulevard
Suntec Tower Two
#14-01/02/03
Singapore 038989
Tel: (65) 6221 2336

Fax: (65) 6220 6684
Website: www.scicollege.org.sg

M8a PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

M8a PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

M8a PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Capital Markets

& Financial Advisory

WARNING To All Examination Candidates

(iii) There will be NO REFUND of Examination Fees paid.

(b) For a Foreigner, the identification document must either be:

Please note that no exception shall be made.

© 2011 by Singapore College of Insurance Limited. All rights reserved.

1st Edition published in October 2011

The objectives of the CMFAS Module 8A – Collective Investment Schemes II

Organisation of Study guide

Chapter Outline and Key Learning Points

Revisions And Updates

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURED PRODUCTS ............................. 1

CHAPTER 5 EXAMPLES OF STRUCTURED FUNDS ........................................ 89

VERSION CONTROL RECORD

KEY LEARNING POINTS

1. WHAT IS A STRUCTURED PRODUCT?

Structured products are among the fastest growing investment classes in

Investors need sufficient knowledge to evaluate structured products in the

1.1 How Does A Structured Product Work?

A bond provides regular interest payments and repayment of the par

Where there is demand, there is supply. An equity-linked note designed

Consider a 5-year note linked to ABC Company’s stock whose

In the worst case scenario, the ABC shares decline to S$50,

In other words, this structured product enables the investor to

Furthermore, if the zero-coupon bond issuer defaults, the investor

A zero-coupon bond is used in the structuring because it is cheaper,

Both bonds and options have fixed maturity dates. Consequently,

1.2 What Is A Wrapper?

Structured products can be created and marketed in different formats,

The most common wrappers are:

Different wrappers have their distinct advantages and disadvantages

It should be kept in mind that advantages and disadvantages are

security of capital. By the same token, while the lower administrative

Table 1.1: Advantages & Disadvantages Of Different Wrappers

Wrapper Advantages Disadvantages

1.3 Why Invest In Structured Products?

Structured products can be used as an alternative to a direct

Structured products can offer access to exotic asset classes typically

Structured products can be used as part of the asset allocation process

Investment banks typically can issue structured products quickly,

While structured products may suit investors’ particular investment

1.4 Challenges Facing Structured Products

Owing to increasing product complexity, correct pricing and efficient

The difficulty with pricing is that markets for instruments used to

Pricing and risk management go hand-in-hand. If financial institutions

2. COMPONENTS OF A STRUCTURED PRODUCT

There are two components in every investment transaction, namely the

Figure 1.1: Components Of A Structured Product

Structured products are no exception; they consist of the same two

2.1 Principal Risk Versus Return Risk

The primary risk to the return component is market volatility. All

For example, a product promised to deliver a return equals to 50% of

The return component is also subject to the credit risk of the

There is a trade-off between safety of principal and participation in an

Figure 1.2: Trade-off Between Safety Of Principal

2.2 Trade-off Between Risk And Return

In the realm of finance, risk refers to uncertainty. When it is said that

While it is intuitive to avoid unworthy investments represented in the