Various Type of Pipelines
Various Type of Pipelines
Various Type of Pipelines
Configuration Alternatives
Figure 1
Presentation Objectives
• basic concepts
• simplified definitions
• historical background
Figure 1a
Basic Concepts and Definitions
Figure 2
Historical Background
Figure 2a
Breakout Sessions
Discussion of:
• comparison of pros and cons of various
alternatives
• preferred pipeline configuration for Alaska’s
offshore
Figure 3
Pipeline Configurations
Single Wall Pipelines
Single wall
pipeline
Internal corrosion
coating or factory
installed inlays External corrosion coating
Figure 4
Pipeline Configurations
Single Wall Pipelines - with external bundled line
Figure 4b
Pipeline Configurations
Single Wall Pipelines
Applications:
• most areas of the world
• wall thickness and coating
variations match
requirements
• external bundles requiring
operating flexibility
Figure 5
Pipeline Configurations
Pipe-in-Pipe Pipelines
Single Pipe-in-Pipe (Concentric)
Rollers or guides
Spacer/Bulkhead
Figure 6
Pipeline Configurations
Pipe-in-Pipe Pipelines
Single Pipe-in-Pipe (Concentric)
Typical Applications:
• increased
insulation/protection
• controlled buoyancy for
installation
Figure 7
Pipeline Configurations
Pipe-in-Pipe Pipelines
Single Pipe-in-Pipe with Fixed Bulkhead
Fixed bulkhead
Inner product pipe
Figure 8
Pipeline Configurations
Pipe-in-Pipe Pipelines
Single Pipe-in-Pipe with Fixed Bulkhead
Typical Applications:
• insulation/protection
• two lines to optimize design
• offsets collapse stresses
during installation
Figure 9
Pipeline Configurations
Cased Bundles
multiple inner
product lines
internal coatings
external corrosion
coatings
Figure 10
Pipeline Configurations
Cased Bundles
Typical Applications:
• unique and complex
operating conditions
• need for utility lines,
power, data
• additional insulation
• ease of installation
Figure 11
Pipeline Configurations
Cased Bundles - Drake F-76
Spacer
18” Carrier Pipe
Figure 12
Offshore Pipeline Installation
Equipment and Methods
Figure 12a
Pipeline Installation Equipment
Conventional Lay Barges
Stinger
Figure 13
Pipeline Installation Equipment
Conventional Lay Barges
Typical Applications:
Figure 13b
Pipeline Installation Equipment
Reel Barges or Ships
Pipe reel
Stinger
Figure 14
Pipeline Installation Equipment
Reel Barges or Ships
Typical Applications:
• open, ice-free water
• deep water
Figure 14b
Pipeline Installation Equipment
Conventional Pipeline Spread
Figure 14c
Pipeline Installation Equipment
Conventional Pipeline Spread
Typical Applications:
• shore approach
• over-ice
• shallow water
Figure 14d
Pipeline Installation Method
Open Water Lay
Typical Applications:
Figure 14e
Pipeline Installation Methods
Towed Bundles
Figure 15
Pipeline Installation Methods
Towed Bundles
Figure 15a
Pipeline Installation Methods
Towed Bundles
Typical Applications:
• deep water
• pipe-in-pipe
• reduce installation
forces on lay barge or
reel barge
• narrow construction
window
Figure 15b
Pipeline Installation Methods
Over-ice Installation
Figure 16
Pipeline Installation Methods
Over-ice Installation
Typical Applications:
• arctic locations
• shallow water
• shoreline transitions
Figure 16b
Figure 17
Figure 18
Pipe-in-Pipe and Bundle Statistics
Total Projects vs. Time
34
35
30
24
25
Number of 20
Projects 15
10 7
5
0
1970 - 79 1980 - 89 1990 - 99
NOTE: 85% of all lines were insulated
Figure 19
Pipe-in-Pipe and Bundle Statistics
Total Length vs. Time
161
180
160
Total miles 140 97
installed 120
offshore 100
80
60 32
40
20
0
1970 - 79 1980 - 89 1990 - 99
Figure 20
Pipe-in-Pipe and Bundle Statistics
Geographical Distribution
Figure 21
Pipe-in-Pipe and Pipe Statistics
Percentage of Total Pipeline Population
Figure 22
Pipe-in-Pipe and Pipe Statistics
Water Depth for Projects
29%
30% 24% 24%
20%
Distribution 20%
of projects 10% 3%
(%) Water Depth (ft)
0%
0 - 200 200 - 400 400 - 600 600 - 800 800+
Figure 23
Pipe-in-Pipe and Bundle Statistics
Installation Method
100% 68%
Distribution
of 50% 23% 9%
installation Water Depth (ft)
0%
methods (%) Lay Barge Reel Barge Towed
Figure 24
Pipe-in-Pipe and Bundle Statistics
Inner Pipe Diameter
55
50
55
50
Frequency of 45 40 29 26
Inner Pipe Sizes35 23
30 21
for all Projects25
20
15 10 7 8
10 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 1 1
5 3-D Column 1
0
2"
3"
4"
5"
6"
8"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
36
Inner Pipe Diameter (Nominal Inches)
Figure 25
Pipe-in-Pipe and Bundle Statistics
Outer Pipe Distribution
10 10
10 9
6
Frequency of 5 5
4 4 4 4
Outer Pipe 5 3 3 3
2 2 2
Sizes for all 1 1
2
Projects 0
3-D Column 1
0
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
4"
6"
8"
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
44
Outer Pipe Diameter (Nominal Inches)
Figure 26
Summary:
Various Configurations
Figure 27
Summary:
Various Installation Equipment
reel ship
lay barge
conventional
pipeline spread
Figure 28
Summary:
Various Installation Methods
over-ice
tow or pull
Figure 29
Summary:
Statistics
• >99% of all offshore lines are single wall
• increasing number of projects using pipe-in-
pipe/bundles, most insulated
• high percentage used in deeper water
• towed installation method common
• wide range of sizes
Figure 30
An Overview of Pipeline
Configuration Alternatives
Figure 31