Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 61 views

    Food Haus Appraisal-Mustapha

    Uploaded by

    Sittie Ainie
    This document contains a work immersion performance appraisal for a student named Raihanie D. Mustapha. It evaluates her performance across several competencies at Maigo Food Haus and Catering Services over a training period. Her supervisor, Anabell L. Tuballi, rates her performance in areas such as teamwork, communication, productivity, and professionalism on a scale of 1 to 5. After calculating a weighted average for each competency, an overall rating is determined and converted to an equivalent grade using a transmutation table. Comments from the supervisor are also included in a remarks section.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Food Haus Appraisal-Mustapha

    Uploaded by

    Sittie Ainie
    61 views3 pages
    This document contains a work immersion performance appraisal for a student named Raihanie D. Mustapha. It evaluates her performance across several competencies at Maigo Food Haus and Catering Services over a training period. Her supervisor, Anabell L. Tuballi, rates her performance in areas such as teamwork, communication, productivity, and professionalism on a scale of 1 to 5. After calculating a weighted average for each competency, an overall rating is determined and converted to an equivalent grade using a transmutation table. Comments from the supervisor are also included in a remarks section.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    food haus Appraisal-Mustapha

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a work immersion performance appraisal for a student named Raihanie D. Mustapha. It evaluates her performance across several competencies at Maigo Food Haus and Catering Services over a training period. Her supervisor, Anabell L. Tuballi, rates her performance in areas such as teamwork, communication, productivity, and professionalism on a scale of 1 to 5. After calculating a weighted average for each competency, an overall rating is determined and converted to an equivalent grade using a transmutation table. Comments from the supervisor are also included in a remarks section.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    61 views3 pages

    Food Haus Appraisal-Mustapha

    Uploaded by

    Sittie Ainie
    This document contains a work immersion performance appraisal for a student named Raihanie D. Mustapha. It evaluates her performance across several competencies at Maigo Food Haus and Catering Services over a training period. Her supervisor, Anabell L. Tuballi, rates her performance in areas such as teamwork, communication, productivity, and professionalism on a scale of 1 to 5. After calculating a weighted average for each competency, an overall rating is determined and converted to an equivalent grade using a transmutation table. Comments from the supervisor are also included in a remarks section.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Republic of the Philippines

    Mindanao State University


    Maigo School of Arts and Trades
    Maigo, Lanao del Norte

    WORK IMMERSION PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

    STUDENT’S NAME: Raihanie D. Mustapha STRAND: Technical Vocational Livelihood-


    Home Economics
    Partner Institution: Maigo Food Haus and Catering Services
    Address: Maigo, Lanao del norte Contact No. 09651692221
    Work Immersion Supervisor: Anabell L. Tuballi Position: Owner
    Training Period _________________ to _____________Total No. of Hours Rendered _________

    Directions: For each behavioral item listed within the competency bands, with 5 being the most and 1 is
    the least, please select the evaluation most suited.

    5 Outstanding Performance exceeds the required standard.


    Performance fully met job requirements. Was able to
    4 Very Satisfactory
    perform what was expected of a person in his/her position.
    Performance has met the required standard. Can perform
    3 Satisfactory
    duties with minimal supervision.
    Perform partially meets the required standard. Less than
    2 Fair
    satisfactory could be doing better.
    Performance does not meet the required standard. Major
    1 Needs Improvement
    improvements needed.
    NA Not Applicable Performance indicator is not relevant to the job.

    COMPETENCIES 5 4 3 2 1
    TEAMWORK
    1. Consistently works with others to accomplish goals and tasks.
    2. Treats all team members is a respectful courteous manner.
    3. Actively participates in activities and assigned tasks required
    4. Willing to work with team members to improve team
    collaboration on a continuous basis.
    5. Considers the feedback and views of team members when
    completing an assigned task.
    TEAM WORK Total Score/5

    COMMUNICATION
    1. Actively listens to supervisor and/or co-workers.
    2. Comprehends written and oral information.
    3. Consistently delivers accurate information both written and
    oral.
    4. Reliably provides feedback as required, both internally and
    externally.
    COMMUNICATION Total Score/4

    ATTENDANCE AND PUNCTUALITY


    1. Is punctual on a regular basis.
    2. Maintains good attendance.
    3. Informs supervisor in a timely manner when absenteeism and
    tardiness may occur.
    ATTENDANCE AND PUNCTUALITY Total Score/3

    COMPETENCIES 5 4 3 2 1
    PRODUCTIVITY/RESILIENCE
    1. Consistently produces quality results.
    2. Meets deadlines and manages time well.
    3. Can do multitasking.
    4. Can work under pressure and delivers the required tasks.
    5. Effective and efficient in time management.
    6. Efficiently informs supervisor of any challenge or hindrance
    related to given task or assignment.
    PRODUCTIVITY/RESILIENCE Total Score/6

    INITIATIVE/PROACTIVITY
    1. Completes assignments with minimum supervision.
    2. Completes tasks independently and consistently.
    3. Seeks support as need arises.
    4. Recognizes and takes immediate action to effectively address
    problems and opportunities.
    5. Engages in continuous learning.
    6. Contributes new ideas and shares skills to improve the
    department/organization.
    INITIATIVE/PROACTIVITY Total Score/6

    JUDGEMENT/DECISION MAKING
    1. Analyzes problems effectively.
    2. Has the ability to make creative and effective solutions to
    problems.
    3. Demonstrates food judgment in handling routine a problems.
    JUDGEMENT/DECISION MAKING Total Score/3

    DEPENDABILITY/RELIABILITY
    1. Has the ability to follow through and meet deadlines.
    2. Has commitment for his/her action.
    3. Can adjust easily to changes in workplace.
    4. Displays high level of performance at all times.
    DEPEDABILITY/RELIABILITY Total Score/4

    ATTITUDE
    1. Offers assistance willingly.
    2. Shows a positive work attitude.
    3. Shows sensitivity to and consideration for other’s feelings.
    4. Accepts criticism positively.
    5. Shows pride in work.
    ATTITUDE Total Score/5

    PROFESSIONALISM
    1. Respects persons in authority.
    2. Uses all tools, equipment and facilities responsibly.
    3. Follows all policies and procedures when issues and conflict
    arises.
    4. Physical appearance conforms to the workplace and placement
    rules.
    PROFESSIONALISM Total Score/4

    Weighted
    OVER-ALL RATING
    Average

    SUMMARY OF SCORES

    WEIGHTED
    CRITERIA
    AVERAGE
    TEAM WORK
    COMMUNICATION
    ATTENDANCE AND
    PUNCTUALITY
    PRODUCTIVITY/RESILIENCE
    INITIATIVE/PROACTIVITY
    JUDGEMENT/DECISION MAKING
    DEPENDABILITY/RELIABILITY
    ATTITUDE
    PROFESSIONALISM
    Over-All Weighted Average
    Equivalent Grade

    REMARKS: (Comments/Suggestions)
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________________

    Student’s Signature __________________________ Date _________________________

    ANABELL L. TUBALLI
    Work Immersion Supervisor’s Signature over Printed Name

    Transmutation Table
    Computed Weighted Average Equivalent Grade
    4.20 - 5.00 100
    3.40 - 4.19 95
    2.60 - 3.39 90
    1.80 - 2.59 85
    1.00 - 1.79 80

    You might also like