Criteria For Evaluating Textbooks and Other Printed Material

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Criteria for Evaluating Textbooks and Other Printed Material

Area/Criteria 4 3 2 1 0
Excellent Good Adequat Weak Totally
e lackin
g

Goals
1. Are the goals of the program or authors
clearly stated? Are these goals compatible
with local program goals
2. Is the scope and sequence for the entire
series carefully developed and clearly
presented?
3. Do the materials reflect authentic use of
language? Is this the way people in the
target culture really express themselves?
4. What is the intended grade level for the
materials? Are the materials suitable for the
interests and maturity level of the proposed
audience?

Communication
1. Does communication rather than grammar
serve as the organizing principle?
2. Is the use of English avoided in student
materials and discouraged in the activities
described in the teacher’s manual?
3. Do the materials reflect an understanding of
the use of physical-response strategies and
of immersion methodology?
4. Is the material oriented to activity and
experience rather than to exercise and drill?
5. Do the materials provide opportunities for
meaningful, purposeful language use?
6. Are the materials designed to develop a solid
oral language base upon which to build
reading and writing skills?

Culture
1. Is culture integrated into the program
materials? Is there emphasis on experiencing
culture rather than on learning about
culture?
2. Is culture presented form a global
perspective rather than focusing on a single
country, region, or ethnic group?
3. Are the situations and language presented
culturally authentic?
4. Do the materials promote an appreciation of
the value and richness of cultural diversity?
Area/Criteria 4 3 2 1
Excellent Good Adequat Weak
e
Subject Content and Thinking Skills
1. Is there provision for the teaching of grade-
appropriate subject content in the target language?
Are there suggestions for interdisciplinary content
and activities?
2. Are the materials conducive to the development of
higher-order thinking skills and not restricted to rote
learning?
Bias
1. Are the illustrations and text free of racial, gender,
and cultural bias?
Flexibility
2. Are the materials adaptable to different program
models and time allocations?
3. Do the materials provide options for a variety of
student learning styles—visual, auditory,
kinesthetic?
Physical Characteristics
1. Are the student materials visually oriented and
colorful?
2. Are photographs and other pictures clearly linked to
the printed material?
3. Is the size of print in student materials the same as
that used in subject content textbooks used at the
same grade level?
4. Are the materials durable? Can they withstand
handling by many students over the period of time
covered by a textbook adoption?
Support Materials
1. Is there a teacher’s manual with abundant
suggestions for the teacher? Does the teacher
receive adequate guidance in the use of the
materials?
2. Are there relevant and effective charts,
transparencies, filmstrips, flash cards, pictures,
tapes and other support materials available in
addition to the basic program?
3. If taped materials are available, do they feature
native-speaker voices speaking naturally in the
presentation of songs, rhymes, and stories? Are
there tapes available that include program-relevant
sound effects and background music?
Budget
1. Are the materials affordable?

You might also like