Helen Bowers implemented a new plan to crack down on employees and eliminate idle time in order to increase profits and compete internationally. However, her plan treats employees as robots rather than valued members of the company. Cutting benefits and pay without input from employees will lead to resentment and lower productivity. As a consultant, I would advise Helen to reconsider her authoritarian approach and apply her father's more democratic and humanistic methods of valuing employees to maintain their trust, support, and high productivity. Treating workers fairly while gaining their input is key to achieving her goals in a sustainable way.
Helen Bowers implemented a new plan to crack down on employees and eliminate idle time in order to increase profits and compete internationally. However, her plan treats employees as robots rather than valued members of the company. Cutting benefits and pay without input from employees will lead to resentment and lower productivity. As a consultant, I would advise Helen to reconsider her authoritarian approach and apply her father's more democratic and humanistic methods of valuing employees to maintain their trust, support, and high productivity. Treating workers fairly while gaining their input is key to achieving her goals in a sustainable way.
Helen Bowers implemented a new plan to crack down on employees and eliminate idle time in order to increase profits and compete internationally. However, her plan treats employees as robots rather than valued members of the company. Cutting benefits and pay without input from employees will lead to resentment and lower productivity. As a consultant, I would advise Helen to reconsider her authoritarian approach and apply her father's more democratic and humanistic methods of valuing employees to maintain their trust, support, and high productivity. Treating workers fairly while gaining their input is key to achieving her goals in a sustainable way.
Helen Bowers implemented a new plan to crack down on employees and eliminate idle time in order to increase profits and compete internationally. However, her plan treats employees as robots rather than valued members of the company. Cutting benefits and pay without input from employees will lead to resentment and lower productivity. As a consultant, I would advise Helen to reconsider her authoritarian approach and apply her father's more democratic and humanistic methods of valuing employees to maintain their trust, support, and high productivity. Treating workers fairly while gaining their input is key to achieving her goals in a sustainable way.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
OB CASE 1: Helen Bowers
1. How successful do you think Helen Bowers’s new plan will
be? Ans.: Helen’s new plan will not be much successful. She is thinking that her employee are only the workers which she had paid the money to meet her goal. As Helen father Jake treated the employees like part of his family. She thinks this ‘Humanistic nonsense’ is not good for her company. So she implemented a straight decision to crack down on employees and eliminate all idle time. She stopped asking the advice from her employee which her father done before. She announced that the firm’s profit sharing will be phased out. She is so eager in fulfilment of her goal i.e. to put her company on international market and compete with the Japanese firm. She is thinking her employee as robots she lost her humanistic view towards her employee. These plan including the equal pay cut of employee having less than 10% productivity will not solve the situation and would only lead resentment among employees. Employees will not be happy with this plan/decision that they had do more hard work without any recreational and welfare programs for them. This plan will lead lower in productivity of Bowers Company and it cannot compete internationally.
2. What challenges does Helen confront?
Ans.: The main challenge for Helen confront is to retain the support of her employees and the trust his father had built towards the employee. Helen’s approach to treat the employees as the hired help only and her policies are against their welfare and development which is going to hamper the company’s productivity. Although Helen’s decision marginally increased the output but also the scarp rates increases, personnel costs went up, training cost also got up. But in the backend the employees are the getting demotivated which result is going to lead in major decline in production which will hamper the Helen goals to compete with the Japanese firm and to enter international market. 3. If you were Helen’s consultant, what would you advise her to do? Ans.: If I were the Helen’s consultant I would suggest to apply the methods or policies that her father used before. I would suggest to be rethink on her decision and understand the consequences. She need to listen the employee’s voice and their opinion. She should changes her policies and plan more democratically. I would suggest to adapt her father’s method of dealing with the workpower which is the main pillar of the company growth.