Human Rights Education: Universality and Inalienability: Human Rights Are Universal and Inalienable. All People
Human Rights Education: Universality and Inalienability: Human Rights Are Universal and Inalienable. All People
CONCEPTUAL:
“We declare that human rights are for all of us, all the time: whoever
we are and wherever we are from; no matter our class, our opinions, our
sexual orientation” --- Ban Ki-moon
BASIC CONCEPTS:
1. Human Dignity
2. Humanity
3. Universality
4. Inalienability
5. Indivisibility
6. Interrelatedness
7. Equality
8. Non-Discrimination
9. Accountability
10.Participation
In 539 BC, Cyrus the Great, after conquering the city of Babylon, did something
totally unexpected—he freed all slaves to return home. Moreover, he declared people
should choose their own religion. The Cyrus Cylinder, a clay tablet containing his
statements, is the first human rights declaration in history.
The idea of human rights spread quickly to India, Greece and eventually Rome. The most
important advances since then have included:
1215: The Magna Carta—gave people new rights and made the king subject to the law.
Otherwise known as the Great Charter, the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215 was under the
kingship of King John in England. It declared the Sovereign (the King) to be subjected to
the Rule of Law and documented individual rights. It became the foundation Anglo-
American jurisprudence on individual rights. (Source: Britannica.com)
1628: The Petition of Right—set out the rights of the people. The Petition of Right,
passed on 7 June 1628, is an English constitutional document setting out specific individual
protections against the state (Source: Wikipedia)
1789: The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen—a document of France,
stating that all citizens are equal under the law.
1948: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights—the first document listing the 30
rights to which everyone is entitled. (Source: youthforhumanrights.org)
Maurice Cranston held that human rights are matters of “paramount importance” and their
violation “a grave affront to justice” (Cranston 1967);
James Griffin says, human rights should be understood as “resistant to trade-offs, but not
too resistant” (Griffin 2008)
Henry Shue suggests that human rights concern the “lower limits on tolerable human
conduct” rather than “great aspirations and exalted ideals” (Shue 1996).
“Political forces have mooted the principal philosophical objections, bridging the chasm
between natural and positive law by converting natural human rights into positive legal
rights” (Henkin 1978).
PRACTICE:
Lecturer:
Kalibo Office: