The defendant was charged with six counts of estafa for falsely representing that she could recruit or employ complainants for overseas jobs and process the necessary papers, collecting fees. While claiming no involvement, the defendant admitted to having no license for overseas recruitment. The elements of estafa were met since the defendant deceived complainants into believing she could help them find jobs abroad, despite being unlicensed, causing them financial damage by paying fees for nothing. The defendant was found guilty of estafa.
The defendant was charged with six counts of estafa for falsely representing that she could recruit or employ complainants for overseas jobs and process the necessary papers, collecting fees. While claiming no involvement, the defendant admitted to having no license for overseas recruitment. The elements of estafa were met since the defendant deceived complainants into believing she could help them find jobs abroad, despite being unlicensed, causing them financial damage by paying fees for nothing. The defendant was found guilty of estafa.
The defendant was charged with six counts of estafa for falsely representing that she could recruit or employ complainants for overseas jobs and process the necessary papers, collecting fees. While claiming no involvement, the defendant admitted to having no license for overseas recruitment. The elements of estafa were met since the defendant deceived complainants into believing she could help them find jobs abroad, despite being unlicensed, causing them financial damage by paying fees for nothing. The defendant was found guilty of estafa.
The defendant was charged with six counts of estafa for falsely representing that she could recruit or employ complainants for overseas jobs and process the necessary papers, collecting fees. While claiming no involvement, the defendant admitted to having no license for overseas recruitment. The elements of estafa were met since the defendant deceived complainants into believing she could help them find jobs abroad, despite being unlicensed, causing them financial damage by paying fees for nothing. The defendant was found guilty of estafa.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Pre-Employment of Workers; Illegal Recruitment; Estafa
Case No. 43, Bejerano
People vs. Delos Reyes FACTS: Appellant was charged with six counts of Estafa for falsely misrepresenting that they had the capacity to recruit or employ the complainants for employment and could facilitate the processing of the pertinent papers upon payment to meet the requirements thereto. Payment of processing fee was thereafter delivered to the appellant. Appellant admitted that she was the Overseas Marketing Director of All Care Travel & Consultancy, with All Care Travel & Consultancy as its affiliate. She claimed that she did not know Suratos, Guillarte, Alayon, Bagay, Jr., and Gloria. She likewise claimed that she neither signed nor issued any receipt using the name "Manzie delos Reyes" in favor of the complainants. She further claimed that she was not engaged in any recruitment and placement activities. However, during the pre-trial, she admitted that she had no license to recruit workers for overseas employment. ISSUE: Whether or not appellant is guilty for the crime of estafa. RULING: Yes. The elements of estafa are: (1) the accused defrauded another by abuse of confidence or by means of deceit; and (2) the offended party or a third party suffered damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation. Here, appellant deceived private complainants into believing that she had the authority and capability to send them abroad for employment, despite her not being licensed by the POEA to recruit workers for overseas employment. Because of the assurances given by accused-appellant, the private complainants parted with their hard-earned money for the payment of the agreed placement fee, for which accused-appellant issued petty cash vouchers and used fictitious names evidencing her receipt of the payments. MAINPOINT: The elements of estafa are: (1) the accused defrauded another by abuse of confidence or by means of deceit; and (2) the offended party or a third party suffered damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation.