Adr 2-01 Am 1 Es

Explanatory Statement 1
Australian Design Rule 2/01 Side Door Latches and Hinges Amendment 1
Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 2/01 –

Side Door Latches and Hinges) 2006
Amendment 1
Made under section 7 of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989
Explanatory Statement
Issued by the authority of the Parliamentary Secretary for Infrastructure and Transport
January 2012
Explanatory Statement to F2012L00284

CONTENTS
1. LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT............................................................................... 3
2. CONTENT AND EFFECT OF ADR 2/01 AND THE AMENDMENT ........... 3
2.1. Overview of the ADR......................................................................................... 3
2.2. Effect of the ADR............................................................................................... 3
3. BEST PRACTICE REGULATION ................................................................... 4
3.1. Business Cost Calculator .................................................................................... 4
3.2. General Consultation Arrangements .................................................................. 4
3.3. Specific Consultation Arrangements for this Vehicle Standard ......................... 5
3.4. Regulation Impact Statement ............................................................................. 5
4. STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ................... 5
4.1. Overview of the Legislative Instrument ............................................................ 5
4.2. Human Rights Implications ................................................................................ 5
4.3. Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 5

1. LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT
Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 2/01 – Side Door Latches and Hinges) 2006
is made under the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 (the Act). The Act enables the
Australian Government to establish nationally uniform standards that apply to new road
vehicles when they are first supplied to the market in Australia. The Act applies to such
vehicles whether they are manufactured in Australia or are imported.
The making of the vehicle standards necessary for the Act's effective operation is
provided for in section 7 which empowers the Minister to "determine vehicle standards
for road vehicles or vehicle components".
Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 2/01 – Side Door Latches and Hinges) 2006
(ADR 2/01) was originally determined in 2006.
2. CONTENT AND EFFECT OF ADR 2/01 AND THE AMENDMENT

2.1. Overview of the ADR
ADR 2/01 specifies requirements for side door retention components including latches,
hinges, and other supporting means to minimise the likelihood of occupants being
thrown from a vehicle as a result of impact. Its technical content is based on United
Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Regulation No. 11 (R 11).
2.2. Effect of the ADR
ADR 2/01 currently lists UNECE R 11/02 as an alternative standard. UNECE R 11 was
updated to the 03 series in June 2007 in order to align it with Global Technical
Regulation No.1 - Door Locks and Door Retention Components, which is also
referenced as an alternative standard within the ADR. This update revises the hinge and
door latch testing procedures, extends these from doors on the side of the vehicle only,
to doors that open in a vertical direction and to any door at the back of the vehicle that is
used for passenger entry. It also sets requirements for door lock operation. More detail
of the equipment required for each test is provided.
This amendment involves the following changes:

 allowing UNECE R 11/03 as an alternative standard;
 updating the technical content of the ADR to allow for the latest version of
UNECE R 11 to be fully reflected within the text; and
 updating references to include the latest clause numbering.
These changes do not increase the stringency of the ADR, as an alternative standard
clause will continue to provide the option of complying with UNECE R 11/02. The
main effect of the amendment will be to provide industry with the option of complying
with the latest version of UNECE R 11.

3. BEST PRACTICE REGULATION
3.1. Business Cost Calculator

There is no expected increase in cost to manufacturers, as the proposed amendments do
not increase the stringency of the ADR.
3.2. General Consultation Arrangements

It has been longstanding practice to consult widely on proposed new or amended
vehicle standards. For many years there has been active collaboration between the
Federal and the state/territory governments, as well as consultation with industry and
consumer groups. Much of the consultation takes place within institutional
arrangements established for this purpose. The analysis and documentation prepared in
a particular case, and the bodies consulted, depend on the degree of impact the new or
amended standard is expected to have on industry or road users.
Depending on the nature of the proposed changes, consultation could involve the
Strategic Vehicle Safety and Environment Group (SVSEG), Technical Liaison Group
(TLG), Transport and Infrastructure Senior Officials’ Committee (TISOC) and the
Standing Council on Transport and Infrastructure (SCOTI).
 SVSEG consists of senior representatives of government (Australian and

state/territory), the manufacturing and operational arms of the industry
(including organisations such as the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries
and the Australian Trucking Association) and of representative organisations of
consumers and road users (particularly through the Australian Automobile
Association).
 TLG consists of technical representatives of government (Australian and

state/territory), the manufacturing and operational arms of the industry
(including organisations such as the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries
and the Australian Trucking Association) and of representative organisations of
consumers and road users (particularly through the Australian Automobile
Association).
 TISOC consists of state and territory transport and/or infrastructure Chief

Executive Officers (CEO) (or equivalents), the CEO of the National Transport
Commission, New Zealand and the Australian Local Government Association.
 SCOTI consists of the Australian, state/territory and New Zealand Ministers

with responsibility for transport and infrastructure issues.
Editorial changes and changes to correct errors are processed by the Department of
Infrastructure and Transport. This approach is only used where the amendments do not
vary the intent of the vehicle standard.
Proposals that are regarded as significant need to be supported by a Regulation Impact

Statement meeting the requirements of the Office of Regulation Review as published in
Best Practice Regulation Handbook and the Council of Australian Governments

Principles and Guidelines for National Standard Setting and Regulatory Action for
Ministerial Councils and Standard-Setting Bodies.
3.3. Specific Consultation Arrangements for this Vehicle Standard

The change to allow the latest version of UNECE R 11 as an alternative standard was
requested by vehicle manufacturers. The proposed amendment was provided out of
session to AMVCB members on 7 December 2011. No objections were subsequently
raised.
As the amendment is minor in nature, and does not increase the stringency of the ADR,
there is no need for further consultation through TISOC, SCOTI, or the public comment
process.
3.4. Regulation Impact Statement

As the proposed amendment does not increase the stringency of the ADR, a Regulation
Impact Statement is not required.
Since the decision is made by the Parliamentary Secretary for Infrastructure and
Transport without reference to SCOTI and the proposal is not considered significant, the
Office of Best Practice Regulation requirements have been met for this regulatory
proposal (OBPR Reference No. ID 13380).
4. STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY WITH HUMAN RIGHTS
The following Statement is prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights
(Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
4.1. Overview of the Legislative Instrument
Under the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 Australian Design Rules (ADRs) are
published to provide national standards for vehicle safety, anti-theft and emissions.
ADR 2/01 was published to specify requirements for side door retention components,
including latches, hinges, and other supporting means, to minimise the likelihood of
occupants being thrown from a vehicle as a result of impact.
4.2 Human Rights Implications
ADR 2/01 Amendment 1 in its nature and contents, is compatible with the human rights
and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3
of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
4.3 Conclusion
ADR 2/01 Amendment 1 does not engage any of the applicable human rights or
freedoms and it is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights
issues.

Adr 2-01 Am 1 Es

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Adr 2-01 Am 1 Es

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Adr 2-01 Am 1 Es

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Explanatory Statement 1

Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 2/01 –

Made under section 7 of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989

Explanatory Statement to F2012L00284

Explanatory Statement to F2012L00284

2. CONTENT AND EFFECT OF ADR 2/01 AND THE AMENDMENT

This amendment involves the following changes:

Explanatory Statement to F2012L00284

3. BEST PRACTICE REGULATION

3.1. Business Cost Calculator

3.2. General Consultation Arrangements

 SVSEG consists of senior representatives of government (Australian and

 TLG consists of technical representatives of government (Australian and

 TISOC consists of state and territory transport and/or infrastructure Chief

 SCOTI consists of the Australian, state/territory and New Zealand Ministers

Proposals that are regarded as significant need to be supported by a Regulation Impact

Explanatory Statement to F2012L00284

3.3. Specific Consultation Arrangements for this Vehicle Standard

3.4. Regulation Impact Statement

4. STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY WITH HUMAN RIGHTS

4.1. Overview of the Legislative Instrument

4.2 Human Rights Implications

Explanatory Statement to F2012L00284

You might also like