OECD Education Working Papers No.

226

Digital strategies
in education across OECD
countries: Exploring Reyer van der Vlies
education policies on digital
technologies
https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/33dd4c26-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
EDU/WKP(2020)14

Unclassified English - Or. English

14 September 2020
DIRECTORATE FOR EDUCATION AND SKILLS

Digital strategies in education across OECD countries: Exploring education policies on

digital technologies

OECD Education Working Papers No 226

Reyer Van der Vlies (OECD).

This working paper has been authorised by Andreas Schleicher, Director of the Directorate for
Education and Skills, OECD.

Reyer van der Vlies ([email protected])

Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin ([email protected]).

JT03465236
OFDE

This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory,
to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
2  EDU/WKP(2020)14

OECD EDUCATION WORKING PAPERS SERIES

OECD Working Papers should not be reported as representing the official views of the
OECD or of its member countries. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein
are those of the author(s).
Working Papers describe preliminary results or research in progress by the author(s) and
are published to stimulate discussion on a broad range of issues on which the OECD works.
Comments on Working Papers are welcome, and may be sent to the Directorate for
Education and Skills, OECD, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France.
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the
status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and
boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to
be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.
Comment on the series is welcome, and should be sent to [email protected].
This working paper has been authorised by Andreas Schleicher, Director of the Directorate
for Education and Skills, OECD.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.oecd.org/edu/workingpapers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
© OECD 2020

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14 3

Abstract

This working paper identifies OECD countries’ interests in digital innovation in education
by analysing their policy papers on digital education. Many OECD countries have adopted
a specific strategy on digital education, or integrated the topic in a generic strategy on
digital innovation as such. The ideas that are expressed in the strategies differ greatly; some
are work in progress, others contain bold envisions of the future. There is a high awareness
among OECD countries of the benefits of digitalisation, and the role of government to
support digital innovation in education. This paper covers and documents countries’ policy
focus before the 2020 coronavirus crisis.

Résumé

Ce document de travail identifie les intérêts des pays de l'OCDE en matière d'innovation
numérique dans l'éducation en analysant leurs documents d'orientation sur l'éducation
numérique. De nombreux pays de l'OCDE ont adopté une stratégie spécifique sur
l'éducation numérique, ou ont intégré le sujet dans une stratégie générique sur l'innovation
numérique en tant que telle. Les idées exprimées dans les stratégies sont très différentes ;
certaines sont en cours d'implémentation, d'autres contiennent des visions audacieuses de
l'avenir. Les pays de l'OCDE sont très conscients des avantages de la numérisation et du
rôle du gouvernement dans le soutien de l'innovation numérique dans l'éducation. Ce
document couvre et documente les orientations politiques des pays avant la crise des
coronavirus de 2020.

Unclassified
4  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Table of contents

Abstract 3
Résumé 3
1. Introduction 5
2. Research and methodology 5
2.1. Research objective 5
2.2. Methodology – use of sources 6
2.3. Digital education strategies and strategies on digital innovation 6

3. Digital technologies in education 7

3.1. ICT infrastructure 7
3.2. Advances in existing ICT technologies 10
3.3. Data management and learning analytics 12
3.4. Artificial intelligence 14
3.5. Blockchain 16

4. Challenges 17
4.1. Digital literacy and competences 17
4.2. Equity and inclusion (digital divides) 20
4.3. Privacy and security 22

5. Conclusion 22
References 27
Annex A. Oversight per country/economy 31

Boxes
Box 3.1. Artificial intelligence (AI) 14
Box 3.2. Blockchain 16
Box 5.1. Oversight of digital education strategies 24

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14 5

1. Introduction

Society is evolving at a rapid pace. Discussions on self-driving cars, cryptocurrencies and

face-recognition surveillance are no longer reserved for science-fiction; they are part of our
future history. Innovations are to an ever increasing extent digital, and digital innovations
create new opportunities in almost every field of our economies, and hold a promise to
improve human welfare and well-being.
Education has not been at the front-line of digitalisation. Even though access to information
and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure in schools is widespread in OECD
countries (OECD, 2019, p. 179[1]), students will generally encounter new technologies
outside the classroom. Recent OECD work shows there has been a moderate level of
innovation in educational practices in primary and secondary education, and that this has
mainly taken the form of an increased use of technology in classroom and school practices
(Vincent-Lancrin et al., 2019, p. 17[2]) However, the coronavirus crisis has shown that the
familiarity with digital tools remained limited.
The transition to a digital era concerns education perhaps more than other parts of our
societies. Equipping education with the right digital skills and tools is a prerequisite to keep
up with ever increasingly demanding digital economies and societies. In this respect,
education faces two challenges: reaping the benefits of digital innovations to improve
educational practices and policies, and preparing students with the right skills for
increasingly automated economies and societies, including, for some of them, the skills to
contribute to the further development of digitalisation.
In recent years, many OECD countries have set out strategies to invest in digital education
and support educators to transition into the new era. Their attempts prove a great consensus
to keep education up to date, and to ensure that students take advantage to live and work in
the twenty-first century. While the coronavirus crisis will probably lead to a change in
countries’ policy priorities regarding the digitalisation of education, this paper aims to
document what those priorities were prior to the crisis and thus offers a baseline to assess
emerging objectives and priorities.

2. Research and methodology

2.1. Research objective

The objective of this paper is to identify OECD countries’ policy interests in the
digitalisation of education as of 2020. For that purpose, an analysis has been made of
OECD countries’ policy papers on this subject in order to distinguish similarities and
outstanding differences between them. The analysis was based on two questions. The first
question was related to new technologies and their practical use: what are the digital
technologies that OECD countries value and support in the field of education? As a result
of the outcomes, a second question was formulated: What are the opportunities and
challenges OECD countries see?
The paper focuses on primary and secondary education in particular. This does not mean
that it has no significance for tertiary education, as technologies can often be applied in
more than one education level. It is noted that digital technologies may be particularly
relevant in technological education, such as education in science, technology, engineering
and mathematics (STEM). This analysis however focuses on the use of digital technologies
in regular education. Specific STEM policies have not been taken into account.

Unclassified
6  EDU/WKP(2020)14

This paper was mostly prepared before the worldwide outbreak of Covid-19. Any policy
or regulation with regard to online education during the lockdown period has not been taken
into account.1

2.2. Methodology – use of sources

The paper is based on two types of sources. Primary sources are the documents from OECD
countries’ governments: most importantly digital education strategies (long-term strategy
policy documents that specifically focus on digital education), as well as other online
materials, such as informative webpages. Primary sources directly reflect OECD countries’
views. Secondary sources are reports from other public organisations. For example, in the
case of OECD countries in Europe, reports by European Schoolnet and Eurydice proved
valuable.
There are constraints to the availability and use of the sources. In the first place, the
information is fragmented. Some primary sources are elaborate, whilst others are more
concise. This makes it difficult to compare policies on a one-on-one base. If certain
information is lacking in a digital education strategy, it does not necessarily mean that a
country has no policy on the subject. It only means that it is not published online, or at least
that it is not part of the public strategy documents. As there is no unity between digital
education strategies, and websites are not always up to date or properly archived, it is
difficult to give a complete picture. Secondary sources are often not available; the
differences between them make it difficult to compare.
In the second place, there is no zero measurement: it is only partially known what the ‘state
of art’ is in OECD countries with regard to the use of digital technologies, with most
information relating to IT infrastructure and use. The analysis is therefore restricted to
challenges and opportunities as seen and explained by governments of OECD countries.
The feasibility of plans and projects is not part of the analysis. It should be taken into
account that the primary sources are often written with a political objective. In many cases,
they provide proposals and visions for the future, instead of information on current
performances.
In the third place, due to the nature of the subject, sources are quickly outdated. As digital
innovations develop rapidly, sources older than a few years have been taken into account
cautiously. Most OECD countries however have recently published new digital education
strategies.
Despite the constraints, the primary and secondary sources provide a clear view on digital
education policies.

2.3. Digital education strategies and strategies on digital innovation

Digital education has become an important strategic topic in virtually all OECD countries.
Half of them have published a digital education strategy. In Australia, Belgium and Canada,
state governments have taken responsibility for the digital education strategy, sometimes
in cooperation with the federal government. In Germany, the Constitution was amended to
create a basis for the DigitalPakt, an agreement between federal and state governments on
digital education.2

1
Specific information on education during and after the Covid-19 pandemic has been collected and published on the OECD
Education blog at oecdedutoday.com/coronavirus/ (accessed September 2020).
2
https://www.bmbf.de/de/wissenswertes-zum-digitalpakt-schule-6496.php (in German). (Accessed May 2020.)

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14 7

In case OECD countries did not adopt a digital education strategy, information about digital
education was often available in a broader national strategy on digital innovation as such.
For example, the Estonian digital agenda for 2020 connects an update of the curriculum to
the acquisition of ICT skills that are needed in different professions and sectors
(Government of the Republic of Estonia, 2018[3]). OECD countries have also published
information about digital education on their websites; this information has not been
regarded as a strategy in itself, but has been taken into account for the analysis. Finally,
some OECD countries have created public digital platforms to support education. A few of
these platforms have been analysed for this paper.
There is an important difference between digital education strategies on the one hand and
generic strategies on digital innovation on the other. Digital education strategies aim at
education and visualise how digital innovation can benefit education. Generic strategies
have a different focus, often economic growth and modernisation. If education is part of a
generic strategy – not rarely in combination with research and science – the purpose is often
the other way around, that is, to visualise how education can benefit digital innovation or
the digital economy. STEM education takes an important place in these digital strategies.

3. Digital technologies in education

Most innovations today are at least partly enabled by digital technologies or embodied in
data and software (OECD, 2019, p. 13[4]), and digitalisation has been one of the main
drivers of innovation in educational practices in the classroom in the past decade. (Vincent-
Lancrin et al., 2019[2]) This paper starts with an analysis of the digital technologies that
OECD countries value and support in the field of education, in as far as they are part of
their digital education strategies.
OECD countries acknowledge the benefits of digitalisation and the role of government to
support digital innovation. Digital education strategies cover several opportunities in the
field of education. At the same time however, they illustrate that OECD countries tend not
to be primarily involved in the development of specific technologies. Instead, they rather
focus on societal challenges that originate from the digital transition (see section 4). In as
far as digital education strategies mention technologies, it is often with regard to the
opportunities for education. Some countries have adopted a specific strategy on artificial
intelligence (AI), which often contain a consideration on education and lifelong learning.
AI strategies have been taken into account only to the extent where they are relevant for
education.
This section provides a typology of the digital technologies and their uses that are referred
to in digital education strategies. It should not be seen as an oversight of what is currently
happening in OECD countries, but rather as an outcome of what they have explicitly put
down about their vision on digital innovation.

3.1. ICT infrastructure

A first striking similarity between digital education strategies is the prominent place of ICT
infrastructure: a high-speed connection to the Internet, and the availability of devices
(computers, tablets) to use digital services. Even though ICT in itself is anything but new,
and most students in OECD countries have access to computers in schools (OECD, 2019,
p. 183[1]), advanced ICT creates better opportunities for digital innovation. Accelerating
innovation cycles require higher standards for Internet connectivity and digital devices.
Internet connectivity

Unclassified
8  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Investments in ICT infrastructure are often part of digital strategies rather than of digital
education strategies, as they generally serve broad purposes. Encouraging the adoption of
ICT in specific sectors like education was a top ten priority in OECD countries in 2017,
and expected to become even more important in the period until 2022. (OECD, 2017,
p. 36[5]) Australia’s National Broad Network project for example was established in 2009
to design, build and operate Australia’s broadband access network. The projects key
objective is to ensure all Australians have access to fast broadband at affordable prices
(Government of Australia, 2018, p. 31[6]).3 Students and schools benefit from the
investment.
The United Kingdom tied itself to building a world-class digital infrastructure by investing
in the ‘networks of the future’: full fibre and 5G. The digital strategy states that
GBP 400 million will be invested in a Digital Infrastructure Investment Fund, and that
public funding is made available for the roll-out of full fibre broadband networks in
partnership with local authorities across the country. Furthermore, a new broadband
universal service obligation must ensure that every individual, business and public premise
across the country has the right to request an affordable, high speed broadband connection
at a sufficient speed for an average family to make full use of the Internet, up to a reasonable
cost threshold (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport of the United Kingdom,
2017[7]).4
The United States has placed the ICT infrastructure at the heart of its digital education
strategy. Affordability remains the primary obstacle for robust connectivity, and network
speed and capacity pose significant challenges for schools. A lack of competition for
broadband services is particularly problematic in rural areas. The United States strategy
requests leaders to take responsibility and ensure ubiquitous access among education
stakeholders to connectivity and devices, as well as to support personnel to ensure
equipment is well maintained. Leaders should recognise the importance of building
capacity for creating and maintaining the technology infrastructure (Department of
Education of the United States, 2017, p. 45[8]). The United States also listed key elements
for infrastructure plans for schools, which include network management, technical support,
maintenance and upgrade of devices and equipment, insurance, licensing, and firewall
protection, amongst others (Department of Education of the United States, 2017, p. 81[8]).
Japan has taken fiscal measures to promote investments in ICT infrastructure in schools,
according to the document Utilization of ICT and data in school education. The Japanese
digital education strategy claims that a high-speed and large-capacity network and the
availability of computers are essential to work with advanced digital technologies. The
strategy also mentions the importance of cloud computing and virtual private networks
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, 2019[9]).
In-depth information about investments is scarce. Eurydice has provided a brief oversight
of ICT infrastructure in Germany, Ireland and Poland. (Eurydice, 2019, p. 90[10]) The
federal government of Germany has invested five billion euros under the DigitalPakt; the
state governments each contribute with a minimum of ten percent of the amount invested
by the federal government. The Irish Digital strategy for schools has committed 210 million
euros (2015-2020); Poland has spent over EUR 372 million for its Nationwide Education
Network.

3
See also nbnco.com.au/corporate-information/about-nbn-co. (Accessed May 2020.)
4
See also gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/1-connectivity-building-world-class-digital-infrastructure-for-the-
uk. (Accessed May 2020.)

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14 9

Digital devices
The second aspect of the ICT infrastructure is the availability of appropriate digital
services. Access to computers is part of many digital education strategies, although mobile
learning devices like tablets and smartphones are increasingly important. There is no clear
line on what kind of devices are best for any kind of education. The United States’ strategy
states that selecting the appropriate devices depends in large measure on the age of students,
their individual learning needs, and the types of learning activities that will be ongoing in
the classroom or in after school programmes (Department of Education of the United
States, 2017, p. 76[8]).
Several digital education strategies contain considerations about “bring your own device”
(BYOD) policies. BYOD means that students bring their own devices and connect them to
the Internet (Wi-Fi) at school. There seems to be no systematic yes or no against the use of
BYOD, but strategies warn against using BYOD as a primary method for ensuring that
students have access to digital education. It can widen gaps between students, as digital
devices may not be affordable for every student. The United States mentions an
instructional burden for teachers, who have to manage learning activities while supporting
multiple platforms and device types. Activities can also be incompatible with certain
devices. Finally, there may be privacy and security issues with regard to the use of personal
devices, as they might lack required safeguards (Department of Education of the United
States, 2017, p. 76[8]).
Occasionally, digital education strategies mention more specific devices. Hungary for
example ascertains that a minimum percentage of specialised classrooms within a school
should have interactive display devices suitable for 3D display, and that there should be at
least one 3D printer per every 500 students in primary and secondary schools. In addition,
a programmable robot must be available for every three students in a computer classroom
(Government of Hungary, 2016[11]).
As part of the 2015 Digital Education Plan, France deployed a longitudinal assessment of
educational digital activities – ELAINE – to measure the effects of the distribution of digital
equipment on students’ skills and on teaching practices and the attitude of teachers towards
digital learning.5 The measurements started in 2018 and 2019; the earliest results are
expected in 2021.

3.1.1. Public-private partnerships

Occasionally, OECD countries mention public-private partnerships as part of their strategy
for ICT infrastructure. This is for example the case in the Flemish Community of Belgium
and in the Netherlands.
According to the European Schoolnet report, the Flemish Community of Belgium has made
arrangements for a framework agreement with the private telecom sector and software
resellers to provide better conditions for educational institutions (European Schoolnet,
2017[12]). The Netherlands contribute to public-private partnerships with publishers,
distributors, and software providers to build a vision of the educational resources chain.
This vision must centre on the education sector as a user, which should be put first in the
partnerships. The Netherlands support SIVON, a cooperation between school boards that
are jointly committed to achieving a better match between supply and demand on the
educational resources market (Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the
Netherlands, 2019, p. 9[13]).

5
More information can be found on education.gouv.fr/presentation-de-l-etude-elaine-303264. (Accessed June 2020.)

Unclassified
10  EDU/WKP(2020)14

More generally, some digital education strategies acknowledge the importance of the
private sector for educational technology, often simply referred to as EdTech. The Flemish
I-LEARN tender proposal for example challenges EdTech companies to open up their
digital applications for education. The proposal states that I-LEARN is meant to unite
Flemish companies and create a Flemish version of the British Educational Suppliers
Association, a trade association for the educations suppliers sector in the United Kingdom
which operates on a not-for-profit basis.6
The strategy of the United Kingdom claims that a dynamic business sector is crucial for its
ambitions. It aims to ensure a choice of high-quality, evaluated products that meet the needs
of educators, to harness the new ideas and emerging technologies that have been developed
by innovative start-ups, and to help providers with proven products to scale and grow. With
regard to organising demand, the United Kingdom has taken several actions, such as
recommending buying deals for schools to get cheaper prices, and facilitating a better
online marketplace for EdTech (Department for Education of the United Kingdom, 2019,
p. 20[14]).

3.2. Advances in existing ICT technologies

Although perhaps not the most futuristic prospect, many innovations are based on advances
in existing ICT, such as the Transmission Control Protocol and Internet Protocol (the
communication technology which made the Internet possible). (Akgiray, 2019[15])
Initiatives like massive open online courses (MOOC) and digital platforms stem from such
advances, or on combinations of advanced ICT and AI.
In this regard, digital learning environments have been put forward by several OECD
countries as an opportunity for education. This section deals with the wide range of digital
learning environments, as mentioned in the strategies.

3.2.1. Digital learning environments

Education systems have been accustomed to digital portals, learning management systems
and other digital technologies for the last decades. New technological advances continue
to create opportunities for policy makers and educators to integrate digital innovation in
the system and learning activities.
Digital learning environments are not a new phenomenon, but their possibilities keep
advancing and OECD countries and economies have put interest in the new opportunities
they offer. Digital learning environments have been broadly described as ‘technical
solutions for supporting learning, teaching and studying activities’, including combinations
of different technical solutions. (Suhonen, 2006[16]) This broad definition justifies the wide
variety of functions that have been assigned to digital learning environments by OECD
countries, although it underlines as well how difficult it is to accurately describe the matter.
Some OECD countries have chosen to be actively involved by creating digital learning
environments at a national level, offering a wide range of services for different
stakeholders: management, teachers, students, parents. Services include – amongst others
– access to resources, cloud storage, learning analytics, integration of social media, as well
as tools for learning, including collaborative learning and community networks, and

6
‘Project proposal I-LEARN. Personalised digital learning in Flemish education’ (Gepersonaliseerd digitaal leren in het Vlaamse
onderwijs), i-learn.vlaanderen. (Accessed May 2020.) See besa.org.uk for more information on the British Educational Suppliers
Association.

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  11

assessment. As the next examples show, data exchange and storage can be an important
part of (and reason for) digital learning environments too.
Estonia’s digital project e-Estonia, a public digital environment that has been running for
several years, encompasses education.7 The website contains four features: (1) the Estonian
Education Information System, a state database that brings together all the information
related to education in Estonia; (2) eKool and Stuudium, two widely used web tools that
provide an easy way for parents, teachers and children to collaborate and organise all the
information necessary for teaching and learning; (3) e-Schoolbag, a portal that contains
learning materials and allows access from a single point; and (4) other e-school solutions,
such as ELIIS, an online software solution that provides innovative and digital solutions for
pre-schools and kindergartens to organise their daily work, Foxcademy, a platform with
games, 3D models, videos, etc. that allow students to understand subjects in a better way,
and Roboversity, a set of robotics training programmes to push gifted students to develop
their engineering skills further.
Another existing public digital environment, the Danish User Portal Initiative
(Brugerportalinitiativ) provides a public infrastructure and standardisation framework for
learning management systems and data exchange across schools in the country. The portal
was initiated after an agreement between the Ministry of Education and municipal councils
to establish a digital platform that provides a single entry point for all educational data and
digital services held and used by schools.8
The Luxembourg Digital4Education portal leads to several digital learning environments,
such as: eduSphere, an online teaching and learning platform that enables teachers to
deliver modern, multimedia-based lessons; Bee Creative, an initiative to allow young
people to use digital technologies (digital literacy) and to promote creativity, talents and
entrepreneurship in this context; and MathemaTIC, a personalised, multilingual math
learning environment.9
Besides public digital learning environments, which can be offered at different government
levels, OECD countries also tend to encourage schools and teachers to use digital learning
environment services from private companies. For example, Israel has set up a programme
to encourage teachers to implement tools and digital environments for learning and
assessment processes, with an emphasis on alternative assessment methods to promote
collaborative learning. The programme is meant for digital learning environments that
enable students to (1) build personal and collaborative knowledge through online tools and
digital information, (2) to use digital communication with other students and teachers in an
intelligent way, (3) share information in a variety of textual, visual and auditory media, and
(4) have an in-depth dialogue with other students on learning contents. The programme is
focused on the intelligent use of digital learning environments by teachers and students
(European Schoolnet, 2018, p. 16[17]).

3.2.2. Access to resources

Partly in relation to digital learning environments, several OECD countries have shown
interest in (open) access to digital resources, notably digital educational materials. Enabling

7
e-estonia.com/solutions/education. (Accessed May 2020.)
8
https://www.kl.dk/nyhed/2014/oktober/nyt-brugerportalinitiativ-til-den-digitale-folkeskole/ (in Danish). (Accessed February
2020.)
9
portal.education.lu/digital4education/. See also digital-luxembourg.public.lu/initiatives/digital4education for more information
in English. (Accessed May 2020).

Unclassified
12  EDU/WKP(2020)14

open access creates two challenges however. First, there needs to be an adequate amount
of digital resources. Digitisation of educational content is therefore part of some digital
education strategies. Second, access to digital resources may be restricted by security
measures and intellectual property. Some digital education strategies therefore contain
considerations about open access and licence agreements.
According to the United States strategy, the use of openly licensed educational resources
is one of the most effective ways to provide high-quality learning materials at scale. Open
licenses should make the use of resources possible without paying any licensing fees or
requesting permission. For learning resources, open licenses such as Creative Commons
could be used, and for software, open licenses such as GNU General Public License, or
other licenses recognised by the Open Source Initiative or the Free Software Foundation.
The United States currently spends USD 8 billion per year purchasing commercial learning
resources. Besides cost savings, openly licensed materials could also be more accurate than
traditional textbooks, because they can be updated continually as content changes. Finally,
the strategy states that openly licensed materials allow teachers to exercise their own
creativity and expertise, so they can tailor learning materials to meet the needs of their
students (Department of Education of the United States, 2017, p. 77[8]).
Turkey expresses interest to create an ecosystem for the development of digital content and
skills. A national archive will link digital and printed materials to each other, and provide
teachers with supporting materials. Digital content will also be used to prepare a digital
platform to enable customised learning experiences (Ministry of National Education of
Turkey, 2019[18]).
The Netherlands have made open-access of educational resources – making them available,
usable and relevant – a priority. While a great deal of open-access learning material is being
developed in and outside the education sector, this material is often not used to its full
effect, according to the Dutch strategy.

3.3. Data management and learning analytics

Digital innovation is data-driven. Even though data has always been around in education,
technologies like AI and the Internet of Things (IoT) increase the effectiveness and thus
the value of data. Algorithms require vast quantities of data, creating an incentive to
maximise data collection. Digitalisation will further increase the collection of data, which
will become more frequent and easier. Because data can help teachers, administrators and
policy makers to improve education (policies), data are an important part of digital
strategies and digital education strategies. At the same time, it is difficult to compare
countries’ interest in data, as digital education strategies vary widely on this subject.
Initiatives may for example relate to student identification and (central) data storage, or to
learning analytics for feedback or evaluation purposes.
Improving education systems through better data analysis and foresight is the third priority
of the European Union action plan. Big data and learning analytics offer new opportunities
to capture, analyse and use data to improve education. While many countries from the
European Union swift away from the ‘one-size-fits-all’ teaching approach to more
personalised learning, learning analytics can improve personalised learning, e.g. by
identifying at-risk students, and evaluate the impact of different teaching strategies. The
European Union underlines that learning analytics are however still in its infancy in Europe.
The way forward is – amongst other initiatives – to launch AI and learning analytics pilots
in education to make better use of the huge amount of available data and thus help address
specific problems and improve implementation and monitoring of education policy
(European Commission, 2018[19]).

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  13

New South Wales (Australia) has founded the Centre for Education Statistics and
Evaluation to provide data analysis, information and evaluation that improve effectiveness,
efficiency and accountability, collect essential education data and provide a one-stop shop
for information needs, and build capacity across the education sector so that everyone can
make better use of data and evidence.10 In order to make data accessible, the centre also
uses other resources, like the School Finder tool that puts school location data onto maps.
Turkey plans to integrate data from existing systems within an easily accessible
Educational Data Warehouse, which will also run a learning analytics platform to evaluate
academic data of students together with data about their interests, talents and temperament.
The learning analytics tool should lead to a better understanding of learning and teaching
processes, and provide effective feedback. Furthermore, Turkey plans to introduce
school-level data-based management. Its strategy contains a plan for an online platform by
which the ministry and school administrators can monitor school development plans. With
regard to evaluation, a qualification-based evaluation system is to be established to identify,
monitor, and support the qualifications of children in all courses and levels. An e-portfolio
will be prepared to monitor, evaluate, improve, and orient the child from early childhood
until the end of upper secondary education (Ministry of National Education of Turkey,
2019, p. 30[18]).
Hungary has put emphasis on the standardisation of administration systems at central and
institutional levels. It has proposed that they should be accessible with a single user
identification, and that the identification of students and teachers should be based on a
common directory service (Government of Hungary, 2016, p. 56[11]).
Japan has included learning analytics in its digital education strategy. It recognises the
possibilities of learning analytics to provide useful data about students to teachers, which
can be used to improve the discussion between teacher and students. The strategy
underlines however that learning analytics should be used appropriately, and that access
should be concentrated. There should be an alternative if learning analytics cannot be
deployed in a given circumstance. Furthermore, Japan expects that the use of advanced
technology and educational big data can lead to reforms for teachers and management, in
particular by results processing and attendance and time management (Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, 2019[9]).

3.3.1. Open data

Open data standards are occasionally mentioned in digital education strategies. In many
ways, open data can contribute to education in the way open access to digital resources
does. The United States strategy mentions open standards as a means to ensure
interoperability with other learning networks and thus as a key element for digital
infrastructure for schools (Department of Education of the United States, 2017, p. 81[8]).
Québec (Canada) has defined open data as ‘raw, non-nominal, royalty-free data produced
or collected by a public or private organization and made accessible to the public on the
Internet’. The digital education strategy continues that open data reflect the principle of
transparency in public administration, facilitate the participation of citizens in developing
innovative solutions and fosters economic development. Open data provide relevant
information for the general public, analysts, developers, innovators and researchers. To
foster the use of open data, Québec supports the organisation of education hackathons, like
the Repenser l’école hackathon (Ministry of Education and Higher Education of Québec,
2018, p. 41[20]).

10
data.nsw.gov.au/case-studies/nsw-education-data-hub. (Accessed May 2020.)

Unclassified
14  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Open data standards are often part of generic digital strategies. New South Wales
(Australia) for example works with an open data policy. Its objectives are – amongst others
– to assist government agencies to release data for use by the community, accelerate the
use of data to derive new insights for better public services, and use data to inform the
design of policy, programs and procurement.11
The European Union too has set out a directive on open data and the re-use of public sector
information. A new version of this directive was adopted in 2019, to be implemented by
European Union member countries by July 2021. On the basis of the directive, EU countries
shall ensure that certain documents shall be re-usable for commercial and non-commercial
purposes. The directive applies to documents in the public domain, for example publicly
funded research projects and digitised books from libraries.12

3.4. Artificial intelligence

AI is likely the most eruptive technology nowadays. It has been described as arguably the
driving technological force of the first half of the century, transforming virtually every
industry. (Holmes, 2019[21]) In the field of education, AI has been the subject of research
for more than three decades. Most digital innovations in education are based on AI, or on
combinations of AI and other technologies.

Box 3.1. Artificial intelligence (AI)

In 2019 the Expert Group on AI at the OECD defined the AI system as a machine-based
system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions,
recommendations or decisions influencing real or virtual environments. AI systems are
designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy. AI system lifecycle phases consist
of: 1) planning and design, data collection and processing, and model building and
interpretation; 2) verification and validation; 3) deployment; and 4) operation and
monitoring. (OECD, 2019, pp. 23-24[22])
One of the most promising AI techniques is machine learning, which is described as a
set of techniques to allow machines to learn in an automated manner through patterns
and inferences rather than through explicit instructions from a human. Behind machine
learning is a technique referred to as ‘neural networks’, which is accompanied by
growing computational power and the availability of massive datasets, also known as
big data. (OECD, 2019, pp. 27-28[22])

In education, AI is embedded in many technological innovations that provide learning

analytics, recommendations and diagnosis tools in various ways and for various purposes.
In many cases, AI applications are still nascent and used in experimental and local contexts
rather than at scale at the system level. In practice, there are however many examples of
promising uses that foreshadow how AI might transform education in the next decades,
both in the classroom and at the system level, and address different stakeholders: students,
teachers, administrators, parents, as well as policy makers.
Over the last years, several OECD countries have adopted strategies on AI. The OECD AI
Policy Observatory contains a comprehensive, real-time database of AI policies from

11
digital.nsw.gov.au/policy/data-information/making-data-open/nsw-open-data-policy. (Accessed February 2020.)
12
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/open-data. (Accessed May 2020.)

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  15

around the world.13 Many AI strategies contain considerations about (higher) education and
skills with regard to digital innovation and the labour market for AI. For example, Finland
has introduced Elements of AI, an online course to enable citizens with a non-technical
background to contribute to technological innovation.14 Section 4.1 deals with skills in the
light of digital innovation.
AI is rarely specifically mentioned in digital education strategies, and if so, it is often in
general wordings. France for example mentions that the development of AI will support
teachers in their daily practice by helping them with the evaluation and assessment of
students, amongst other chores (Ministry of National Education and Ministry of Higher
Education of France, 2018, p. 12[23]). The United States puts forward that AI can help
students to see patterns in the work of students, and support teachers by using student
expression as an instructional resource (Department of Education of the United States,
2017, p. 19[8]). Japan too states that although AI is not able to replace humans, the
technology easily attracts children’s interest and is interesting to reduce the burden of
learning guidance for teachers (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology of Japan, 2019[9]).
Even though digital education strategies do not specifically elaborate on the use of AI in
education, OECD countries’ interest is sometimes expressed when they address specific
opportunities for education that are based on AI technology.

3.4.1. Assessments
Several OECD countries recognise the promise that digital technologies – AI in particular
– hold for assessing students. Ireland for example puts assessment in the title of its strategy,
which contains a section on assessment reform. Deploying simulations, digital games,
virtual worlds and labs, and e-portfolios enable teachers and students to access learner
performance data in context (Department of Education and Skills of Ireland, 2015,
p. 24[24]).
Israel has placed special emphasis in its ICT program on alternative assessment methods
that promote collaborative learning. Digital environments should contribute to an
assessment culture in which teaching, learning and assessment processes are integrated.15
Sweden is currently developing digital national tests. The National Agency for Education
published a list of technical requirements that schools must have in place to implement the
digital national tests by 2020, amongst which a stable internet connection, enough portable
or stationary computers or tablets, and headphones.16
Assessing students also plays a significant role in the United States strategy. Technology-
based assessments enable new activities, such as graphic response, simulations, and
performance-based assessments that allow students to construct an original response rather
than selecting the right answer from a list. Real-time feedback, increased accessibility (e.g.
for students with special needs), adaptation to students’ abilities and knowledge, and

13
To access the observatory: oecd.ai. (Accessed September 2020).
14
‘Artificial intelligence – Finland’s 1% AI education strategy’, sciencemediahub.eu/2019/06/26/tekoalyaika-finlands-1-ai-
education-strategy/. (Accessed May 2020.)
15
‘General information about the ICT programme in Israel’,
sites.education.gov.il/cloud/home/lmida_shitupit/Documents/ICT%20Cloud.pdf. (Accessed May 2020.)
16
Eurydice national policies platform, eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/national-reforms-school-education-
71_en. (Accessed February 2020.)

Unclassified
16  EDU/WKP(2020)14

embedment with learning processes are important advantages for digital assessment
(Department of Education of the United States, 2017, pp. 58-59[8]).

3.5. Blockchain

To date, blockchain has drawn little attention with regard to its application in education.
While blockchain might be a relative new technology, and only a handful of member
countries have adopted the technology with regard to education, there are a few examples
worth elaborating on.

Box 3.2. Blockchain

A blockchain is a decentralised peer-to-peer network of transactions, confirmations and
ownership transfers. It consists of ‘blocks’, which are transactions that are confirmed by
computers on the network, using cryptographic algorithms and smart ‘contracts’. Chains
of such blocks form a transaction log, which can be summarised into a ‘ledger’. Records
of ownership can be logged into ledgers permanently. Because ledgers are extremely
difficult to corrupt, blockchains have a high level of immutability – making them a
strong alternative to traditional centralised databases. (Akgiray, 2019, p. 7[15])
In the core, blockchain is a combination of already existing technologies, that together
can create networks that secure trust between people or parties who otherwise have no
reason to trust one another. A blockchain enables a secure transfer of value and data
directly between parties and can thus diminish the role of intermediaries. (OECD,
2018[25])
A key inherent characteristic of the blockchain technology is that transactions are
immutable, that is that they are unchanging over time or unable to be changed. This
means that once data has been written to a blockchain, it cannot be changed. Any
interested party is able to verify that data have not been altered. (Berryhill, Bourgery
and Hanson, 2018, pp. 12-13[26])

Blockchain technology in education is in its early stage, and its promises for education are
still far from clear. OECD countries have not given much attention to the technology in
their digital education strategies, or if they have – like France for example – the attention
is restricted to general remarks that blockchain might generate opportunities for education,
in particular for credentialing (Ministry of National Education and Ministry of Higher
Education of France, 2018, p. 12[23]).
Australia has included higher education (universities) in its blockchain strategy, stating that
blockchain offers technological infrastructure on which credentials can be managed and
shared, and that the ability to record or reference credentials on a blockchain provides
benefits to students, education providers, employers and other service providers, including
recruitment agencies in the employment value chain. Blockchain-enabled credentials
empower students with ownership over their own credentials, according to the strategy, and
create opportunities for students into an overseas market, where the ability of foreign
employers to verify credentials might be lower than in the domestic market. On the other
hand, Australia recognises challenges with regard to security and privacy concerns, as well
as a need to take away scepticism among stakeholders (Department of Industry, Science,
Energy and Resources of Australia, 2020[27]).
As part of the action plan for digital education, the European Union is working on the
integration of digital credentials in the Europass platform (European Commission,

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  17

2018[19]).17 The action plan calls for a common technical approach for issuing digitally-
signed qualifications to ensure that member states can understand and correctly interpret
each other’s certificates. The approach is based on open standards and blockchain, and
integrated into the existing Europass platform, where digitally-singed qualifications can be
stored and shared.

4. Challenges

An important part of digital education strategies deals with societal challenges created by
the digital transition. Some challenges will sound familiar: questions about accountability,
trust, privacy and security are asked with regard to digitalisation in all fields.
This section deals with two societal challenges that are more specific to education: digital
literacy and competences, and digital divides. Finally, it comprises a short paragraph on
privacy and security in relation to personal data of students.

4.1. Digital literacy and competences

Education must prepare students with the right skills for the future. This challenge is at the
core of virtually all OECD countries’ education policies, and comprises two aspects. First,
teachers need sufficient training to deploy and teach about digital technologies. Second,
countries need a standard for digital skills and literacy for students.

4.1.1. Teacher competences

Despite or perhaps thanks to new digital possibilities, teachers will likely play a central role
in the future of education. Luckin and Holmes even predict that AI will serve as a ‘catalyst’
for the transformation of the role of the teacher. They argue that AI creates freedom from
routine and time-consuming tasks, allowing teachers to devote their energy to more creative
and human acts ‘that provide the ingenuity and empathy needed to take learning to the next
level’. (Luckin, 2016, p. 31[28])
While digital technologies should ideally be designed to facilitate teachers, their potential
cannot be reached if teachers do not have the right skills to deploy them. There is a
continuous risk that investments in digital technologies have no return or even prove
ineffective for education, if the technologies are not (proficiently) used in class.
OECD countries have put down different measures to tackle this challenge. Their main
challenges are to create more clarity on professional competences on the one hand and to
support professional development on the other. OECD countries have expressed interest in
reference frameworks for teacher competences, and in teacher training and access to
relevant resources. The Québec (Canada) strategy for example refers to both challenges. It
has laid down the development of digital competences of teachers, non-teaching
professionals and support staff as an objective, containing two measures (Ministry of
Education and Higher Education of Québec, 2018[20]):
 Develop a new competency framework for the teaching profession to foster the
integration of digital technologies into the educational practices of future teachers.
 Foster the continuing education of teachers, non-teaching professionals and support
staff in digital pedagogy.

17
See also ‘Implementing the new Europass Project management plan’ on ec.europa.eu. (Accessed May 2020.)

Unclassified
18  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Amongst other countries, Spain has built on the work of the European Commission to
publish a common framework for teaching, which contains a standardized proposal for
competencies, divided in five areas: information and data literacy, communication and
collaboration, digital content creation, safety, and problem solving. (European
Commission, 2013[29]) A national institute for educational technologies and teacher training
further provides face-to-face (e.g. summer courses, congresses) and online training
opportunities for teachers (European Schoolnet, 2018[30]).
In addition to its objective and measures, the Québec strategy mentions two best practices
with regard to teacher training. The first is a network of education consultants that offer a
platform on which they share their expertise in short online training sessions, free of charge.
The platform is intended for teachers and principals, amongst others. The second is
CADRE21, a centre that aims to develop a culture of professional development among
teachers. The centre has a physical location, but the focus is on online access to resources,
blogs and customised training, including ICT skills. The training sessions are certified by
digital badges.
The United Kingdom has launched online training courses for teachers and leaders in
education in partnership with the Chartered College of Teaching. The courses strive to
improve the use of technology in teaching, alongside other training opportunities offered
by industry. Access is freely available online for all educators (Department for Education
of the United Kingdom, 2019[14]).

4.1.2. Digital skills and literacy for students

While ensuring that teachers are digitally competent and equipped is one concern for
OECD countries, digital literacy for students is another. Many digital education strategies
contain a consideration about the importance to prepare students for a digital age, as well
as adapting the curriculum for that purpose.
Digital innovation has created a major challenge for education to prepare students for
increasingly automated economies and societies. The OECD Employment Outlook 2019
estimates that 14% of existing jobs could disappear as a result of automation in the next
fifteen to twenty years, and another 32% is likely to change radically as individual tasks
are automated. (OECD, 2019, p. 15[31]) This prospect has tremendous effects on the set of
skills that people need to make a living in the future, and requires a critical eye on education
rather than esthetical adjustments.
AI for example, seems – at this point – to best humans when it comes to repetitive and
predictive tasks, tasks that hinge on computational power, classifying huge amounts of
data, and making decisions based on concrete rules. People need skills for cases where they
trump the performance of machines, for example for making products and results usable
for humans and communicating about them, and making decisions about abstract values.
(Holmes, 2019, pp. 24-25[21])
There is an ongoing debate on what ‘digital skills’ exactly are, and what other skills are
relevant for students. In an earlier OECD publication, Graaf Hooft elaborates on the work
of Helsper and others, who classify ‘digital skills’ in four broad categories: operational
skills, information-navigation skills, social skills, and creative skills. (Hooft Graafland,
2018, pp. 29-30[32]) The first two categories relate to technical and cognitive skills to use a
computer and the Internet, e.g. to search, find and understand online information; the last
two categories relate to the ability to communicate and interact online, build digital social
capital, and create and share quality content online.
Other skills are relevant in this context as well. Complex skills that are not easily automated
are becoming increasingly important. Recent studies lay an emphasis on higher cognitive

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  19

skills. The World Economic Forum has indicated that skill demand in 2022 will focus on
ten different skills, amongst which analytical thinking, active learning and creativity.
(World Economic Forum, 2018, p. 12[33]) Creativity and critical thinking do not only meet
new labour market demands, but also contribute to human well-being and the good
functioning of democratic societies. (Vincent-Lancrin et al., 2019[34]) Finally, the Skills
Outlook 2019 shows that having higher cognitive skills – literacy, numeracy or problem-
solving skills in technology-rich environments, or a mix of these – significantly augments
the probability that people will move from using the Internet for information and
communication to a diversified and complex use, taking other determinants into account.
(OECD, 2019, p. 137[1]) (Elliott, 2017[35])
Digital education strategies show there is a shared concern that students need adequate
skills for the digital era. Most OECD countries have placed ‘digital literacy’ on their
agenda. The emphasis on digital literacy raises the question what kind of skills are intended.
A distinction can be made between generic skills to live and work in a digital age on the
one hand and specific skills to apply technologies on the other. An example from Slovenia
illustrates that digital literacy may refer to both. After stating that digital literacy is a
precondition for inclusion and participation in the digital society, the government
continues: “Only digitally literate or e-competent citizens can fully communicate digitally,
use modern ICT, develop new skills in different life circumstances, be innovative and
creative in the use of ICT, while in-depth understanding of ICT allow them to modify and
create new technologies, solutions and ideas of use.” (Government of the Republic of
Slovenia, 2016, p. 40[36]) This perspective comprises both specific skills to apply ICT and
generic skills like innovation and creativity.
Germany addresses a comprehensive understanding of digital literacy, including digital
competence as a basic understanding of digital systems, algorithms and coding. Moreover,
digital literacy should be a conceptual part of education according to the digital education
strategies. Measures taken by the government include an initiative to support basic digital
education and the use of digital media in vocational education (‘Vocational training 4.0’)
(Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany, 2019[37]).
Ensuring digital literacy and inclusion for full citizenship is one of three major challenges
for Portugal. According to the digital education strategy, digital literacy – that is ‘the ability
to access digital media and ICTs, understand and critically assess contents, and
communicate effectively’ – is part of digital competences, which further include the
production of new knowledge through research (processing information, communicating,
interacting with and producing digital content). Finally, designing new solutions for
different types of problems, the integration of interdisciplinary knowledge and data
analysis, intensive use of AI, the use of advanced instrumentation and communication
networks and mobile systems, and the development and programming of cyber-physical
systems are also linked to digital competences (Government of the Republic of Portugal,
2017, p. 4[38]).
Developing relevant digital competences and skills for the digital transformation is one of
the priorities for action for the European Commission. Digital competence is part of a
broader agenda to set out competences for lifelong learning, which all citizens should have.
According to the Commission, digital competence means the confident and critical use of
digital technology; it covers the knowledge, skills and attitudes that all citizens need in a
rapidly evolving digital society. Specifically, the Commission also aims to bring coding
classes to all schools in Europe, including by increasing schools’ participation in EU Code
Week (European Commission, 2018[19]).
In summary, teaching students the right skills for the digital society is one of the main
challenges mentioned in digital education strategies. There is no uniform standard on what

Unclassified
20  EDU/WKP(2020)14

these skills are or should be. Distinctions could be made between digital skills that are
meant for a basic understanding and use of digital technologies, and more ‘in-depth’ digital
skills, meant for a deeper understanding of digital technologies. Some OECD countries
have adopted skills in their generic digital strategies. In those cases, education or training
are often addressed as means to serve the digital agenda.

4.2. Equity and inclusion (digital divides)

Inclusion is an important topic in digital education strategies. Digital technologies comprise

both a promise and a challenge for inclusive education. While recognising the opportunities
created by digitalisation, for example with regard to personalised learning, many member
countries focus on the imminent risks brought forth by digital technologies.
The digital transition emphasises the importance of digital and other relevant skills, and
access to digital technologies. This creates a new risk of inequalities between people who
have access to the right education or training and to digital technologies (the haves), and
those who have not (the have-nots). Such inequalities – often referred to as the ‘digital
divide’ – can in its turn create new forms of exclusion.
Discussions about the digital divide date back to the expansion of the fixed-line telephone
network. (Hilbert, 2015[39]) Digitalisation, notably the further development of AI, enhances
the risk of suffering new economic, social and technological divides. This is true on a global
level (UNESCO, 2019[40]), but digital divides play a role within national education systems
and schools just as well. Digital education strategies address the imminent risk of new
digital divides at several levels.
Hungary has announced campaigns to involve groups which are hard to reach. Special
services like digital learning workshops, that have been made available at a local level,
were designed with attention to the learning needs of for example lower-educated people
with weak basic competences (Government of Hungary, 2016, p. 121[11]). The idea to reach
out to individuals or groups that are harder to reach, is also present in the policies of Japan
and Mexico. In Japan, distance learning is seen as an opportunity for learning exchanges
with overseas schools and for joint classes, e.g. to solve problems at small schools (Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, 2019[9]). Mexico has
founded an online university for distance learning, Universidad Abierta y a Distancia de
México. This non-profit and tuition-free initiative aims at providing online courses that can
be followed from home, in particular for regions and groups that do not have access to
schools (Government of Mexico, 2017[41]).
Canada has explicitly placed its investments in the Digital Literacy Exchange programme
in the light of existing inequalities. The programme (2018-2022) is part of the country’s
Innovation and Skills Plan and aims to facilitate and encourage the participation of
underrepresented groups in the digital economy. According to the programme website,
digital skills are increasingly important for Canadians of every age, background, education
level and employment status. There are still groups however “who are newly involved with,
or haven’t fully discovered the benefits of being online. It is important to support these
groups to ensure no one is left behind in the digital economy.” (Innovation, Science and
Economic Development Department of Canada, 2018[42])
The Portuguese strategy emphasises the danger of a digital divide for people who have
already left formal education and are not exposed to vocational training. To ensure a level
of fairness and social cohesion that will lead to balanced and sustainable development, it is
essential to raise awareness about the importance of digital competences. The strategy links
the digital divide to measures with regard to skill training and ICT infrastructure. The
strategy also underlines that it is critical to strengthen gender equality in terms of access to

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  21

and development of digital competences (Government of the Republic of Portugal,

2017[38]).
Outside the discourse of regular education, there are also concerns about the digital divide
between boys and girls (the ‘gender gap’) with regard to STEM education. The European
Union wants to support measures to further decrease the gender gap in the technology
sector by promoting digital skills among girls and mobilise stakeholders – e.g. companies
– to equip girls with digital skills (European Commission, 2018[19]).
Finally, the United States strategy warns that closing the digital divide alone will not
transform learning: the digital use divide too should be closed by ensuring that all students
understand how to use technology as a tool to engage in creative, productive, lifelong
learning rather than simply consuming passive content (Department of Education of the
United States, 2017, p. 21[8]). According to the strategy, the digital use divide continues to
exist between students who are using technology in active and creative ways to support
their learning, and students who predominantly use technology for passive content
consumption. The strategy states that many schools still do not have access to or are not
yet using technology in ways that can improve learning on a daily basis. This underscores
the need to accelerate and scale up adoption of effective approaches and technologies. The
strategy also advises that schools and districts that are deciding how to incorporate
educational technology, should actively involve and engage families during early
development and implementation of their digital transformation. Few schools however
have adopted approaches for using technology to support informal learning experiences
aligned with formal learning goals. At the same time, supporting students in using
technology for out-of-school learning experiences is often a missed opportunity, according
to the strategy. Learning experiences enabled by technology should be accessible for all
students, including those with special needs. Supports to make learning accessible should
be built into learning software and hardware by default (Department of Education of the
United States, 2017, pp. 7-8[8]).

4.2.1. Minorities
Digital divides pop up at different levels, and inclusion is commonly seen by member
countries as one of their major challenges.
A handful of member countries further specifies this challenge with regard to minorities.
Australia’s Tech Future emphasises the differences for indigenous people, whose
households are 75% more likely not to have an internet connection. Indigenous Australians
face additional barriers around skills, affordability and access to culturally appropriate
technology. One of the problems is that many indigenous Australians only access the
internet through mobile phones, which means they have lower levels of digital inclusion,
which could exacerbate other forms of social exclusion, such as unemployment, education
and poverty (Government of Australia, 2018, p. 18[6]).
Québec (Canada) has adopted an approach to take into account the cultural and sociological
characteristics of First Nations and Inuit, and has asked students from these groups for
recommendations to meet their digital needs (Ministry of Education and Higher Education
of Québec, 2018[20]). The Ministry of Education from New Zealand provides guidance and
online resources to support Māori language learning (Education Review Office of New
Zealand, 2018[43]).
In summary, minorities are a specific group, or groups, that face the challenge of a digital
divide with the majority group. In order to close this gap, countries with large groups of
minorities have specifically addressed this challenge in their digital education challenge.

Unclassified
22  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Distance learning is mentioned as a possible solution for individuals or groups without

sufficient access to schools.

4.3. Privacy and security

In general, concerns around privacy and security of data are part of countries’ digital
strategies, and often part of their digital education strategies as well. There are different
ways to address these issues. Strategies can for example focus on the importance to build
secure ICT infrastructure facilities. The digital strategy of Estonia designates security-by-
design and privacy-by-design as principles for the development of digital services and IT.
Cyber security is an important part of the digital agenda; the strategy states that cyber
security capacities will be strengthened and the readiness of the state and private enterprises
to cope with cyber incidents will be increased (Government of the Republic of Estonia,
2018[3]).
Implementing measure for better information security and privacy in basic education are
part of the action plan for the government of Norway (Ministry of Education of Norway,
2017[44]). A secure ICT infrastructure is an important part of the digital education strategy:
ICT systems in the education sector should be designed and secured to protect students
from adverse events, such as security breaches or hacking. Stored information must be
protected in a way that only those who are allowed to see personal data have access to it.
The United Kingdom strategy also focuses on the importance to build secure technology,
but also highlights the importance to raise awareness. The strategy warns that public
services can be vulnerable. Securing digital safety is therefore an important part of the
digital education strategy. The United Kingdom has published a data protection toolkit to
guide schools through key data protection activity. The National Cyber Security Centre
provides advice and support for schools and higher education institutions as well.
Furthermore, the strategy states that EdTech suppliers should adhere to minimum standards
for cyber essentials, developed by the National Cyber Security Centre (Department for
Education of the United Kingdom, 2019, pp. 23-24[14]).
The Swiss strategy finally encourages the importance of data protection and security in
digital education, as personal data are increasingly important to gain access to online
services for example. While some online services are provided free of charge by private
providers for the education sector, the further use of data and their storage location usually
remains non-transparent. This poses data protection problems. According to the strategy,
everyone has a right to know where their data is stored and how their data are used. At the
same time, data security should be an important topic in education. Children must be aware
of the risks associated with the use and publication of personal data (Department of
Economics, Education and Research of Switzerland, 2017, p. 38[45]).

5. Conclusion

The digital transition will have great impact on how and what students learn. OECD
countries acknowledge the importance of digital innovation and the role of government to
support digitalisation in education. Half of OECD countries have adopted a specific policy
strategy on digital education, in which they express their political view on the opportunities
that digital innovation may bring to improve education, and on the challenges it may carry.
Other countries have often made references to education as part of a generic strategy on
digital innovation. In more generic strategies, digitalisation is often seen as a method to
pursue other goals, notably economic growth. Even though it is difficult to compare
strategies on a one-on-one base, there are some striking similarities between them.

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  23

It is important to note that the strategies do not reflect the state of the art of policy
implementation within countries. Most of those strategies have no budget nor
implementation plan. The ideas they put forward may vary from work in progress to bold
envisions. The shutdown of schools after the Covid-19 pandemic has shown that many
countries still have a lot of work to do to integrate digital technologies into their education
system. However, those strategies present countries’ views about the priorities, concerns
and opportunities of digitalisation in education.
Digital education strategies rarely go into detail on specific technologies. Instead, they
rather focus on the functions of technology, which can be based on advances in existing
technologies, on AI applications, or on combinations of technologies. For example, many
strategies mention the opportunities created by digital learning environments: digital
platforms or portals of all kinds help schools, teachers, students and other stakeholders with
their educational processes. They may focus on assessments, digital resources or learning
activities as examples. As data can be used to improve education and education policies,
learning analytics and data management are often part of countries’ strategies too. Digital
education strategies focus mainly on the societal challenges that erupt from the digital
transition. This paper was restricted to the challenges that are specifically important for
education. Skills and competencies take the most prominent place: OECD countries are
committed to the education of students for the 21st century and accordingly to the training
of teachers. At the same time, several OECD countries address the importance to prevent
digital divides and ensure that every child can take advantage of digital education. Another
challenge that is mentioned in several digital education strategies, is the importance of data
protection (privacy and security).
Finally, a major issue for almost all OECD countries is the ICT infrastructure: the
availability of digital devices (computers, tablets) and Internet connectivity. It turns out
that digital education strategies have an eye for the basics of digital education. Investments
of all kind and additional help for schools take a prominent place in strategies.
The health crisis related to the coronavirus showed that those issues remain relevant in most
OECD countries. Updating those strategies and accelerating their implementation will be a
major challenge in the coming years.

Unclassified
24  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Box 5.1. Oversight of digital education strategies

Australia 2018
Australia’s tech future. Delivering a strong, safe and inclusive digital economy
(Australian Government 2018), industry.gov.au
Australia (New South Wales) 2019
Education for a changing world. Policy reform and innovation strategy (New South
Wales Government 2019), education.nsw.gov.au
Australia 2020
The national blockchain roadmap. Progressing towards a blockchain-empowered
future (Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources 2020), industry.gov.au
Austria 2017
Digital roadmap Austria (Bundeskanzleramt 2017), digitalroadmap.gv.at
Austria 2018
Masterplan Digitalisierung (Masterplan digitisation) (Bundesministerium für Bildung,
Wissenschaft und Forschung 2018), bmbwf.gv.at
Belgium (Flanders) 2019A
Vlaams beleidsplan artificiële intelligentie (Flemish AI policy plan) (Vlaamse Regering
2019), ewi-vlaanderen.be
Belgium (Flanders) 2019B
Vlaams beleidsplan cybersecurity (Flemish cybersecurity policy plan) (Vlaamse
Regering 2019), ewi-vlaanderen.be
Belgium (Wallonia) (Digital Agency) 2018
Baromètre digital Wallonia. Éducation et numérique 2018 (Wallonia digital barometer.
Digital education) (Agence du Numérique 2018), digitalwallonia.be/education2018
Canada (Alberta) 2013
Learning and technology policy framework (Alberta Government 2013),
education.alberta.ca
Canada (Québec) 2018
Digital action plan for education and higher education (Ministère de l’Éducation et de
l’Enseignement supérieur Québec 2018), education.gouv.qc.ca
Denmark 2018
Strategy for Denmark’s digital growth (Ministry of Industry, Business and Financial
Affairs 2018), eng.em.dk
Estonia 2018
Digital agenda 2020 for Estonia (Government of the Republic of Estonia 2018),
mkm.ee
European Union 2018

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  25

Digital education action plan (European Commission 2018), eur-lex.europa.eu

France 2018
Digital in the service of the school of trust (Le numérique au service de l’école de la
confiance) (Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale and Ministère de l’Enseignement
Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation 2018), education.gouv.fr
France 2018B
For a meaningful artificial intelligence. Towards a French and European strategy
(Villani Report 2018), aiforhumanity.fr
Germany 2019
Digital future. Learning. Researching. Knowing (Digitale Zukunft: Lernen. Forschen.
Wissen. Die Digitalstrategie des BMBF) (Bundesministerium für Bildung und
Forschung 2019), bildung-forschung.digital
Greece 2019
Digital skills for digital Greece. Action plan 2019 for the promotion of innovation and
digital skills (Ministry of Administrative Reconstruction 2019), nationalcoalition.gov.gr
Hungary 2016
Digital education strategy of Hungary (Government of Hungary 2016), kormany.hu
Iceland 2019
Icelandic society 2035-2040. Economic, environmental, regional, and demographic
developments (Government of Iceland 2019), stjornarradid.is
Ireland 2015
Digital strategy for schools 2015-2020. Enhancing teaching, learning and assessment
(Department of Education and Skills 2015), education.ie
Israel 2017
The digital Israel national initiative. The national digital program of the government of
Israel (Ministry for Social Equality 2017), gov.il
Italy 2015
National plan for digital education (Piano nazionale scuola digitale) (Ministero
dell’Istruzione, dell Università e della Ricerca 2015), istruzione.it
Japan 2019
Promoting measures to utilize cutting-edge technology to support learning in a new era
(Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 2019), mext.go.jp
Korea 2016
Mid- to long-term master plan in preparation for the intelligent information society.
Managing the fourth industrial revolution (Government of the Republic of Korea,
English.msit.go.kr
Netherlands 2019
Digitization agenda. Primary and secondary education (Ministerie van Onderwijs,
Cultuur en Wetenschap 2019), rijksoverheid.nl

Unclassified
26  EDU/WKP(2020)14

New Zealand 2018

Leading innovative learning in New Zealand schools (Education Review Office 2018),
ero.govt.nz
Norway 2017A
Digitalisation strategy for basic education 2017-2021 (Digitaliseringstrategi for
grunnopplæringen 2017-2021) (Kunnskapsdepartementet 2017), regjeringen.no
Norway 2017B
Digitalisation strategy for the higher education sector 2017-2021
(Kunnskapsdepartementet 2017), regjeringen.no
Poland (Working Committee) 2016
The digitalisation of Polish education. Visions and proposals (Working Committee
2016), centrumcyfrowe.pl
Portugal 2017
Portugal INCoDe.2030. National digital competences initiative e.2030 (República
Portuguesa 2017), incode2030.gov.pt
Slovenia 2016
Digital Slovenia 2020. Development strategy for the information society until 2020
(Republic of Slovenia 2016), gov.si
Switzerland 2017
Digitization challenges for education and research in Switzerland (Herausforderungen
der Digitalisierung für Bildung und Forschung in der Schweiz) (Departement für
Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF 2017), sbfi.admin.ch
Turkey 2019
Turkey’s education vision 2023 (Ministry of National Education 2019),
2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr
United Kingdom 2017
UK digital strategy 2017 (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport 2017),
gov.uk
United Kingdom 2019
Realising the potential of technology in education: A strategy for education providers
and the technology industry (Department for Education 2019),
publishing.service.gov.uk
United States 2017
Reimagining the role of technology in education. 2017 National education technology
plan update (US Department of Education 2017), tech.ed.gov

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  27

References

Akgiray, V. (2019), “The Potential for Blockchain Technology in Corporate Governance”, OECD [15]
Corporate Governance Working Papers, No. 21, OECD Publishing, Paris,
https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/ef4eba4c-en.

Berryhill, J., T. Bourgery and A. Hanson (2018), “Blockchains Unchained: Blockchain Technology and its [26]
Use in the Public Sector”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 28, OECD Publishing,
Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/3c32c429-en.

Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport of the United Kingdom (2017), UK digital strategy [7]
2017, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/uk-digital-strategy (accessed on
1 May 2020).

Department for Education of the United Kingdom (2019), Realising the potential of technology in [14]

education: a strategy for education providers and the technology industry,

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7919
31/DfE-Education_Technology_Strategy.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Department of Economics, Education and Research of Switzerland (2017), Digitisation challenges for [45]

education and research in Switzerland, https://www.sbfi.admin.ch/sbfi/de/home/bfi-politik/bfi-2021-

2024/transversale-themen/digitalisierung-bfi.html (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Department of Education and Skills of Ireland (2015), Digital strategy for schools 2015-2020. Enhancing [24]

teaching, learning and assessment, https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/Digital-

Strategy-for-Schools-2015-2020.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Department of Education of the United States (2017), Reimagining the role of technology in education. [8]

2017 National education technology plan update, https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf

(accessed on 1 May 2020).

Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources of Australia (2020), The national blockchain [27]

roadmap. Progressing towards a blockchain-empowered future,

https://www.industry.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-02/national-blockchain-roadmap.pdf (accessed on
1 May 2020).

Education Review Office of New Zealand (2018), Leading innovating learning in New Zealand schools, [43]

https://www.ero.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Leading-Innovative-Learning-in-Schools-2018.pdf (accessed
on 1 May 2020).

Elliott, S. (2017), Computers and the Future of Skill Demand, Educational Research and Innovation, [35]

OECD Publishing, Paris, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264284395-en.

European Commission (2018), Digital education action plan, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- [19]

content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2018:22:FIN (accessed on May 2020).

European Commission (2013), Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes, [29]

https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/experts-groups/2011-2013/teacher/teachercomp_en.pdf
(accessed on 1 May 2020).

Unclassified
28  EDU/WKP(2020)14

European Schoolnet (2018), Israel. Country report on ICT in education, [17]

http://www.eun.org/documents/411753/839549/Israel_2018.pdf/c01cb526-a5d7-469b-b8b1-
b67a494d294b (accessed on 1 May 2020).

European Schoolnet (2018), Spain. Country report on ICT in education, [30]

http://www.eun.org/documents/411753/839549/Country+Report_Spain_2018.pdf/b38b02b0-4b4c-
4925-bccd-3b0cf28ad669 (accessed on 1 May 2020).

European Schoolnet (2017), Belgium - Flanders. Country report on ICT in education, [12]
http://www.eun.org/documents/411753/839549/Country+Report+Flanders+2017.pdf/5dd41869-0b28-
4ef5-89c9-c3d4518d5cc4 (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Eurydice (2019), Digital education at school in Europe, https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national- [10]

policies/eurydice/content/digital-education-school-europe_en (accessed on May 2020).

Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (2019), Digital future. Learning. Researching. [37]

Knowing, https://www.bildung-forschung.digital/files/BMBF_Digitalstrategie.pdf (accessed on

1 May 2020).

Government of Australia (2018), Australia’s tech future. Delivering a strong, safe and inclusive digital [6]

economy, https://www.industry.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-02/national-blockchain-roadmap.pdf
(accessed on 1 May 2020).

Government of Hungary (2016), Digital education strategy of Hungary, [11]

https://www.kormany.hu/download/0/4b/21000/The%20Digital%20Education%20Strategy%20of%20
Hungary.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Government of Mexico (2017), Educational transformation (Transformación educativa), [41]

http://gob.mx/mexicodigital/articulos/transformacion-educativa-95278 (accessed on 1 February 2020).

Government of the Republic of Estonia (2018), Digital agenda 2020 for Estonia, [3]

https://www.mkm.ee/sites/default/files/digitalagenda2020_final.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Government of the Republic of Portugal (2017), INCoDe.2030. National digital competences initiative [38]
e.2030, https://www.incode2030.gov.pt/sites/default/files/incode2030_en.pdf (accessed on
1 May 2020).

Government of the Republic of Slovenia (2016), Digital Slovenia 2020. Development strategy for the [36]
information society until 2020, https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MJU/DID/Digital-Slovenia-2020-
Development-Strategy-for-the-Information-Society-until-2020.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Hilbert, M. (2015), Digital Divide(s), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, [39]

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs012.

Holmes, W. (2019), “Artificial intelligence in education.”, in Artificial intelligence in education. Promises [21]

and implications for teaching and learning, Center for Curriculum Redesign, Boston,
http://bit.ly/AIED-BOOK.

Hooft Graafland, J. (2018), “New technologies and 21st century children: Recent trends and outcomes”, [32]

OECD Education Working Papers, No. 179, OECD Publishing, Paris,

https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/e071a505-en.

Innovation, Science and Economic Development Department of Canada (2018), Digital literacy exchange [42]

program, http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/102.nsf/eng/home (accessed on May 2020).

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  29

Luckin, R. (2016), Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in education. [28]

Ministry of Education and Higher Education of Québec (2018), Digital action plan for education and [20]

higher education,
http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/site_web/documents/ministere/PAN_Plan_action_VA.pdf
(accessed on 1 May 2020).

Ministry of Education of Norway (2017), Digitalisation strategy for basic education 2017-2021, [44]

https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/framtid-fornyelse-og-digitalisering/id2568347/ (accessed
on 1 May 2020).

Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands (2019), Digitization agenda. Primary and [13]

secondary education,
https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/publicaties/2019/03/22/digitaliserings
agenda-primair-en-voortgezet-onderwijs/OCW+Digitization+Agenda+-+English.pdf (accessed on
1 May 2020).

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (2019), Promoting measures to [9]

utilise cutting-edge technology to support learning in a new era,

https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/other/1411332.htm (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Ministry of National Education and Ministry of Higher Education of France (2018), Digital in the service [23]
of the school of trust, https://cache.media.education.gouv.fr/file/08_-_Aout/36/1/DP-
LUDOVIA_987361.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2020).

Ministry of National Education of Turkey (2019), Turkey’s education vision, [18]

http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_vizyon_eng.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2020).

OECD (2019), Artificial Intelligence in Society, OECD Publishing, Paris, [22]

https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en.

OECD (2019), Digital Innovation: Seizing Policy Opportunities, OECD Publishing, Paris, [4]

https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/a298dc87-en.

OECD (2019), OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work, OECD Publishing, Paris, [31]

https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9ee00155-en.

OECD (2019), OECD Skills Outlook 2019 : Thriving in a Digital World, OECD Publishing, Paris, [1]
https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en.

OECD (2018), OECD Blockchain primer, http://www.oecd.org/finance/oecd-blockchain-primer.pdf. [25]

OECD (2017), OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris, [5]

https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264276284-en.

Suhonen, J. (2006), “FODEM: developing digital learning environments in widely dispersed learning [16]

communities”, Educational Technology & Society, pp. 43-55,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220040754.

UNESCO (2019), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable [40]

Development, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994 (accessed on May 2020).

Unclassified
30  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Vincent-Lancrin, S. et al. (2019), Fostering Students’ Creativity and Critical Thinking: What it Means in [34]
School, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris,
https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en.

Vincent-Lancrin, S. et al. (2019), Measuring Innovation in Education 2019: What Has Changed in the [2]
Classroom?, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris,
https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264311671-en.

World Economic Forum (2018), The Future of Jobs Report 2018, World Economic Forum, [33]
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf.

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  31

Annex A. Oversight per country/economy

This annex is meant to give a brief overview of digital education policies in OECD countries and economies

Table A A.1. Oversight per country

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information
AUSTRALIA Education for a changing world. Policy reform and Australia’s tech future. Delivering a strong, safe and Digital learning (Victoria), [link]
innovation strategy (New South Wales Government 2019), inclusive digital economy (Department of Industry, Science,  Online materials and tools
[link] Energy and Resources 2018), [link]
 Skills  Skills
o Curriculum o national curriculum
o 21st century skills, e.g. critical and computational o flexibility, micro-credentials
thinking o key digital skills (incl. artificial intelligence (AI),
 Assessment machine learning (ML), robotics)
 New educational approaches  Inclusion
o applied learning (e.g. integrating real life problems o increasing accessibility through digital technologies
into existing subjects)  Digital infrastructure
o technology-enabled personalisation o e.g. programme for regional and remote areas
o integrated extra-curricular activities.  Data
o open data (data.gov.au), enhanced access, privacy
and security
 Regulation

Unclassified
32  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

AUSTRALIA (cont.) Digital strategy 2019-2023. IT’s all connected: for creative, The national blockchain roadmap: progressing towards a
connected and engaged learners now and in the future blockchain-empowered future (Department of Industry,
(Queensland Department of Education 2019), [link] Science, Energy and Resources 2020)
 ICT infrastructure and devices  Credentialing
o secure and seamless by design digital environments
o scale networks to Internet of Things
 Enhanced collaboration
o interoperability standards, open data
o virtual spaces and classrooms, improved video,
audio and chat tools
 Skills and digital literacy.
AUSTRIA Masterplan digitalisation (Masterplan Digitalisierung) Digital roadmap Austria (Bundeskazleramt 2017), [link] N/A
(Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und  Skills
Forschung 2018), [link] reference framework
 Skills  Open digital resources
o curriculum o open licenses
o teacher training o digital and interactive school books
 ICT infrastructure o open source software
o digital teaching and learning tools  Innovative educational technologies
o roll-out digital devices o e.g. flipped classroom
o broadband, fiber optic connection, Wi-Fi  Foundation for Innovation in Education (EUR 50 million)
 Simplify school administration  ICT infrastructure
o Wi-Fi and broadband
BELGIUM Baromètre digital Wallonia. Éducation et numérique 2018 Flemish AI policy plan (Vlaams beleidsplan artificiële European Schoolnet, Belgium – Flanders. Country report
(Wallonia digital barometer. Digital education) (Agence du intelligentie) (Vlaamse Regering 2019), [link] on ICT in education (2017)
Numérique 2018), [link] Flemish cybersecurity policy plan (Vlaams beleidsplan i-Learn (Flemmish Community) [link]
 ICT infrastructure cybersecurity) (Vlaamse Regering 2019), [link] Project to create online portal for digital (personalised)
o devices (computers, whiteboards, other equipment),  STEM and digital education learning
BYOD o project Schools of the Future
o Internet connections, Wi-Fi
 Skills
o teacher training
o numerical competency
 Digital learning environment
o digital platforms for educational institutions: tools,
clouds

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  33

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

CANADA Learning and technology policy framework (Alberta Canada’s digital charter in action: a plan by Canadians, for Digital Literacy Exchange Program [link]
Government 2013), [link] Canadians (Government of Canada 2019), [link]  CAD 29.5 million investment to support initiatives that
 Skills  ICT infrastructure, reliable and affordable high-speed teach fundamental digital literacy skills (2018-2022)
o training for teachers and other education Internet access  Part of Canada’s Skills and Innovation Plan
professionals  Online educational resources E-learning Ontario [link]
o professional standards  Digital learning environment (learning management
o education leaders ‘champion effective and system)
innovative uses of technology’  Educational resource bank
 Curriculum (e.g. programs of study, assessment)  E-community
 Digital resources and ICT infrastructure
 High-quality digital learning environments
Digital action plan for education and higher education Digital literacy framework (British Columbia) [link]
(Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur  Digital literacy and skills (e.g. creativity and critical
Québec 2018), [link] thinking, digital citizenship)
 Skills  Reference framework
o leadership and professional development
 Bridging digital divide
 ICT infrastructure
 Use digital technologies for innovative teaching and
learning practices
o e.g. MOOCs, gamification, VR/AR, tablets and e-
books, flipped classroom, wearable technology, 3D,
BYOD, etc.
 CAD 1.186 billion to implement digital action plan (2018-
2023)
CHILE N/A Digital agenda 2020 (Government of Chile 2015), [link] Educar Chile [link]
 Digital content + pedagogical-technological innovation in  Online education portal
education system o focus on remote and low-income areas with less
o digital kit for students with special needs access to resources
 Digital training Recommendations for a digital policy in school education
[link]
CZECH REPUBLIC Digital literacy strategy 2015-2020 (Strategie digitální N/A Czech national digital skills and job (DIGI) coalition, [link],
gramotnosti ČR na období 2015 – 2020) (Ministry of Labour [link]
and Social Affairs), [link]  Digital skills
 Digital literacy

Unclassified
34  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

DENMARK N/A Strategy for Denmark’s digital growth (Danish European Schoolnet, Denmark. Country report on ICT in
Government2018), [link] education (2017)
 (plans for) Technology Pact: strengthening technical and
digital skills
 Primary and secondary education: technological
understanding (curriculum)
 DKK 50 million for digital technologies initiatives in
universities
 20 million for development of virtual education
technologies (higher education)
 Digital skills
 Higher education in STEM subjects
 DKK 43.4 million to improve coordination of (continuing)
education across trade and industry to support
technological and digital skills
ESTONIA N/A Digital agenda 2020 for Estonia (Government of the e-Estonia, [link]
Republic of Estonia 2018), [link]  Education Information System
 Teachers’ and students’ ICT competency, basic ICT o state database with data on institutions, students,
skills in schools teachers, graduation documents, study materials,
o cyber defence education in schools curricula (since 2005)
 Technology education in pre-primary education level  eKool and Stuudium
 Resources o web applications for parents, teachers and children
 IT Academy programmes to develop ICT in vocational to collaborate and organise teaching and learning
and higher education information
 Research Information System
o national information system for research and
development – submit applications for grant
competitions, upload CV’s, etc.
 e-Schoolbag and other e-school solutions
o portal for digital learning materials
o further: eKindergarten for innovative and digital
solutions for pre-schools to organize daily work;
unrestricted access to certain learning materials;
platform with games, 3D models, videos, etc. to help
students and monitor their performance;
Roboversity to make students enthusiastic about
robots

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  35

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

EUROPEAN UNION Digital education action plan (European Commission 2018), N/A Eurydice, Digital education at school in Europe (2019), [link]
[link]
 Connectivity in schools
 SELFIE tool for ‘self-reflection’ on the use of digital
technologies for teaching and learning
 Digital qualification documents, issued by education and
training institutions, based on open standards and European Commission, Supporting teacher competence
integrated in the Europass platform development for better learning outcomes (2013)
 Higher education hub – online platform to improve quality  Reference framework for teacher competences
of teaching and learning, facilitate internationalisation
and support cooperation across Europe
 Digital competences and open science skills in higher
education
 AI and analytics pilot projects to predict future skills and
skills shortages
FINLAND N/A Leading the way into the age of artificial intelligence. Final European Schoolnet, Finland. Country report on ICT in
report of Finland’s Artificial Intelligence Programme 2019 education (2017)
(Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment 2019), [link],
[link]
 Recommendations on high-quality education and training
for AI, including vocational education; raising the level of
education to match skills
Digital infrastructure strategy 2025 (Ministry of Transport MPASSid, [link]
and Communications 2018), [link]  National identification service for continual learning;
 High-speed communications networks single sign-on access to all digital services used in
teaching and learning
Avointen oppimateriaalien kirjasto (Library of open
educational resources), [link]
 Open educational resources from all levels of education,
available for use by teachers, learners and others
EXAM, [link]
 Software for higher education, developed and used by a
consortium of Finnish universities for organising
electronic exams in monitored exam studios, or by other
means (e.g. BYOD)

Unclassified
36  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

Digi Arkeen (Digi Everyday), [link]
 Advisory board for the cooperation and dialogue
between the Ministry of Finance and other organisations
that are responsible for the digitalisation of public
services
Koski, [link]
 National study credit, degree and qualification disclosure
service that provides comprehensive access to data
 National education data warehouse
Vocabulary of Education project, [link]
 Project to lay a foundation for developing online services
and creating an information architecture in the field of
education and research, and to help with the flow of
communication between information systems and those
producing, using and searching for information
FRANCE Digital in the service of the school of trust (Le numérique au For a meaningful artificial intelligence. Towards a French
service de l’école de la confiance) (Ministère de l’Éducation and European strategy (Villani report) (2018), [link]
Nationale and Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la
Recherche et de l’Innovation 2018), [link]
 Protection and improved use of educational data
 General interest in development of AI (improved learning
and assessment, relieve teachers of tedious tasks), IoT,
blockchain, free and open resources
 Digital resource bank
 National Center for Distance Education (October 2018)
 Support for digital skills
 Simplify administrative formalities for students and
parents
 Support partnerships between companies and schools

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  37

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

GERMANY N/A Digital future. Learning. Researching. Knowing (Digitale Digital pact schools (DigitalPakt Schule), [link]
Zukunft: Lernen. Forschen. Wissen. Die Digitalstrategie des  EUR 5 billion investment in digital education
BMBF) (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung infrastructure
2019), [link]
 Digital competences
 Prevention of digital divides
 Vocational Training 4.0 initiative
o promote use of digital media, digital equipment for
vocational training centers
 MINT action plan for STEM
 Basic digital education project, digital environments
 central building blocks as digital architecture: online
administration of digital educational data on voluntary
basis, individual opportunities for tailored education
GREECE N/A Digital skills for digital Greece. Action Plan 2019 for the Digital school, [link]
promotion of innovation and digital skills (Ministry of  Teacher training
Administrative Reconstruction 2019), [link]  e-repository of text books
 Skills: information and data literacy, communication and  Computer laboratories
collaboration, digital content creation, safety, problem
solving
 Digital skills in education = third priority
 Actions with regard to coding, teaching with new
technologies, robotics, etc.
HUNGARY Digital education strategy of Hungary (Government of N/A N/A
Hungary 2016), [link]
 Digital competences, skills
o teacher training, reference framework
 ICT infrastructure
o internet access, WiFi
o high quality of IT devices
o equipment for specialised classrooms: 3D printers,
programmable robots, digital data loggers and
sensors in science classrooms, multimedia labs
 Development of digital content
o wide range of e-learning materials should be
available

Unclassified
38  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

HUNGARY (cont.)  Support services
o digital administration, electronic data provision
o electronic platforms for contact with students and
parents, digital learning and teaching activities
 Knowledge base for data in public education, available to
decision-makers
 Digital Methodological Centre to coordinate strategy

ICELAND N/A Icelandic society 2035-2040. Economic, environmental, N/A

regional, and demographic developments (Government of
Iceland 2019), [link]
 Emphasis on core knowledge, skills, and competencies
 More students should specialise in science, technology,
engineering, art, and mathematics (STEAM)
IRELAND Digital strategy for schools 2015-2020. Enhancing teaching, N/A Scoilnet, [link]
learning and assessment (Department of Education and  Digital portal for education
Skills 2015), [link]
 ICT competences
o teacher learning
o digital literacy in the curriculum, assessment reform
o inclusion
 ICT infrastructure
o improve broadband connections in primary schools,
provide wirless networks at new-build stage,
technical guidance documents for schools,
procurement framework for wireless providers
o advice on ICT equipment, guidance for BYOD
approaches
o explore potential of cloud-based services
 Awareness-raising actions and programmes to promote
responsible and ethical use of the Internet

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  39

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

ISRAEL N/A The digital Israel national initiative. The national digital European Schoolnet, Israel. Country report on ICT in
program of the government of Israel (Ministry for Social education (2018)
Equality 2017), [link]
 Narrowing social gaps
 Digital literacy among weakened populations
 Access to quality public goods and services by digital
means
 Digital books program
 Digital skills, online occupational training
 Programming and robotics in curriculum
 ed.il community for hackathons and competitions in the
education field
 National digital learning project (platform)
ITALY National plan for digital education (Piano nazionale scuola N/A N/A
digitale) (Ministry of Education, Universities and Research
2015), [link]
 Vision on digital schools: digital opportunities as enabling
tools, connectors and drivers of change
o projects categorised in: tools, skills and content,
training, and accompaniment
 Access: ‘right to Internet’, fiber for ultra-wide bandwidth
for schools
 Digital environments, guidelines for BYOD policies
 Digital profile for students and teachers
o unique authentication system
 Digitization of school administration and teaching
processes
 Common framework for digital skills of students, update
technology curriculum
 Bridge digital divides
 Promote science, technology, engineering, arts and
maths (STEAM) careers
 Promote innovation, diversity and sharing of educational
content

Unclassified
40  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

ITALY (cont.)  Minimum standrds for e-interoperability N/A N/A
 Promotion of open educational resources
 In-service training for didactic and organizational
innovation, technical assistance for schools
JAPAN Promoting measures to utilize cutting-edge technology to
support learning in a new era (Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 2019), [link]
 IoT, AI, advances in robotics, use of (big) data, AR/VR
 Ensure basic skills
 Promote individual learning
 Use cutting-edge technology and big data sets, based on
digital environments
 Opportunities for children with special needs and
learning disabilities
 Improve ICT environments and equipment, improve
effective use
o digital textbooks and teaching materials
KOREA N/A Mid- to long-term master plan in preparation for the N/A
intelligent information society. Managing the fourth industrial
revolution (Government of the Republic of Korea 2016),
[link]
 Foster creativity and technological capacity
LUXEMBOURG N/A N/A Digital4Education, [link]
 digital environment, e.g. for mobile learning, digital
classroom, digital resources, education on technologies
and data, digital challenges (cyberbullying, security)
 projects: eduSphere (online teaching and learning
platform), AI Academy

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  41

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

NETHERLANDS Digitization agenda. Primary and secondary education Strategic action plan for artificial intelligence (Ministry of Kennisnet, [link]
(Ministry of Education, Culture and Science 2019), [link] Economic Affairs and Climate 2019), [link]  Publications (in English and Dutch) about ICT
 Innovation by learning for teachers, school principals and  Training opportunities for living with AI and more talent infrastructure and digital technologies (e.g. trends,
administrators for working with AI challenges) in education
o e.g. by effective use of adaptive learning resources  STAP (Labour Market Position Stimulus): EUR 200
which meet pupils’ learning needs and style of million for individual budgets for training and
learning development
o open innovation climate, cooperation between  Focus on (senior) secondary vocational education, e.g.
education and businesses by subsidies (EUR 25 million a year until 2022) for
 Digital literacy for pupils and teachers improving the connection with the labour market, e.g. for
o curriculum projects that offer training in a profession that has
 Digital learning resources changed as a result of AI
o collaborating school boards in educational
resources market (joint purchase)
o open-access educational resources
 Infrastructure
 Ethics, privacy
NEW ZEALAND N/A N/A Education Review Office, Leading innovative learning in
New Zealand schools (2018)
NORWAY Digitalisation strategy for basic education 2017-2021 N/A N/A
(Digitaliseringstrategi for grunnopplæringen 2017-2021)
(Ministry of Education 2017), [link]
 Students’, teachers’ and staff competence
o curriculum
o specialist education for teachers (60 credits)
 Privacy and security
 ICT infrastructure, technology-rich learning environments
 Learning content, digital learning resources (e.g. for
students with special needs)
 Effective use of devices
Digitalisation strategy for the higher education sector 2017-
2021 (Ministry of Education and Research 2017), [link
POLAND N/A N/A The digitalisation of Polish education. Visions and
proposals (2016), [link]

Unclassified
42  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

PORTUGAL Portugal INCoDe.2030. National digital competences N/A N/A
initiative e.2030 (Government of Portugal 2017), [link]
 Digital competences, 5 axes : inclusion, education,
qualification, specialisation, research
o inclusion: ensure whole population has equal
access to digital technologies
o education: ensure education of younger population
o qualification: build the (digital) skills of an active
population
o specialisation: promote specialisation in digital
technologies and applications
o research: ensure conditions re in place for
production of new knowledge and active
participation in international R&D networks and
programmes
SLOVENIA N/A Digital Slovenia 2020. Development strategy for the Monitoring progress in national initiatives on digitising
information society until 2020 (Government of Slovenia industry. Country report Slovenia (July 2019), [link]
2016), [link]  Mentions Slovenian guidelines on further implementation
 Generic strategy with regard to subjects like of ICT in the Slovenian education until 2020
interoperability, ICT infrastructure, cyber security,
inclusive digital society
 Digital literacy and ICT skills
SPAIN N/A N/A European Schoolnet, Spain. Country report on ICT in
education (2018)
SWITZERLAND N/A Digitisation challenges for education and research in N/A
Switzerland (Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung für
Bildung und Forschung in der Schweiz) (Department of
Economics, Education and Research 2017) [link]
 ensuring core values: equal opportunities; security, trust
and transparency; digital empowerment (skills); and
value creation, growth and prosperity
 high-quality, efficient and secure ICT infrastructure;
standardisation

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  43

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

TURKEY Turkey’s education vision 2023 (Ministry of National N/A N/A
Education 2019), [link]
 Data-based management with learning analytics tools
o Learning Analytics Platform
o Data Control Unit, Educational Data Warehouse
 Measurement and evaluation
o e-portfolio for each child, Qualification-Based
Evaluation System to identify and monitor children
o restructuring exam system
 Professional development teachers
 National Digital Content Archive
 Skills; coding and 3D design activities
UNITED KINGDOM Realising the potential of technology in education: A UK digital strategy 2017 N/A
strategy for education providers and the technology industry
(Department for Education 2019), [link]
 5 key areas of opportunity: administration processes
(reduce burden of ‘non-teaching’ tasks), assessment
processes (making assessments more effective and
efficient), teaching practices (supporting access,
inclusion, and improved educational outcomes for all),
continuing professional development (supporting
teachers), and learning throughout life
 IT infrastructure
o (general goal: nationwide full-fibre by 2033)
o support Jisc, independent organisation that provides
digital infrastructure and services for higher and
further education
o guidance documents for schools
o cloud first policy

Unclassified
44  EDU/WKP(2020)14

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

UNITED KINGDOM  Digital capability and skills
(cont.) o launching network of demonstrator schools
o continuing professional development
 Digital procurement capabilities
o recommended buying deals for schools, facilitate
online marketplace for EdTech
o online lending library for EdTech software
o boosting UK EdTech sector, UK as world leader
 Privacy, safety and data security

UNITED STATES Reimaging the role of technology in education: 2017 N/A N/A
national education technology plan update (Department of
Education 2017), [link]
 Empower learning through technology: high-speed
internet access, personalized learning, blended learning,
building competencies
o focus on new technologies, e.g. virtual learning labs,
use of games and simulations, new ways to connect
physical and virtual interaction, AR
o equity, closing digital use divide (accessible
technology)
 Teaching with technology: teacher training, advancing
educational technology in teacher preparation, ongoing
professional learning
 Leadership (creating culture and conditions for
innovation and change)
o openly licensed educational resources
o federal funds to support technology-based
strategies to personalise learning

Unclassified
 EDU/WKP(2020)14  45

Country Digital education strategy Generic digital strategy Online information

 Assessment
o enable enhanced question types, measure complex
competencies, provide real-time feedback, increase
accessibility, adapt to learner ability and knowledge,
embedded with learning process, assess for
ongoing learning
o continuous improvement of assessments, integrated
learning and assessment systems, using data
effectively and appropriately, learning dashboards
that enable visualisations, set of shared skill
standards
 Infrastructure: ubiquitous connectivity, powerful learning
devices, high-quality digital learning content, responsible
use policies

Unclassified