The Sensations of
The Sensations of
The Sensations of
Clarke Slagle Lecture events of everyday life. This lecture reviews sensory processing
literature, including neuroscience and social science perspec-
tives. Introduced is Dunn’s Model of Sensory Processing, and
the evidence supporting this model is summarized.
Specifically, using Sensory Profile questionnaires (i.e., items
describing responses to sensory events in daily life; persons
The Sensations of mark the frequency of each behavior), persons birth to 90
years of age demonstrate four sensory processing patterns:
Everyday Life: Empirical, sensory seeking, sensory avoiding, sensory sensitivity, and low
registration. These patterns are based on a person’s neurolog-
Theoretical, and ical thresholds and self-regulation strategies. Psychophysiology
studies verify these sensory processing patterns; persons with
strong preferences in each pattern also have unique patterns
Pragmatic Considerations of habituation and responsivity in skin conductance. Studies
also indicate that persons with disabilities respond different-
ly than peers on these questionnaires, suggesting underlying
poor sensory processing in certain disorders, including
autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, developmen-
Winnie Dunn tal delays, and schizophrenia.
The author proposes relationships between sensory pro-
cessing and temperament and personality traits. The four
Key Words: sensory processing • tempera- categories of temperament share some consistency with the
ment • threshold four sensory processing patterns described in Dunn’s model.
As with temperament, each person has some level of respon-
siveness within each sensory processing preference (i.e., a
certain amount of seeking, avoiding, etc., not one or the
other). The author suggests that one’s sensory processing
preferences simultaneously reflect his or her nervous system
needs and form the basis for the manifestation of tempera-
ment and personality. The final section of this lecture out-
lines parameters for developing best practice that supports
interventions based on this knowledge.
T
he experience of being human is imbedded in the
sensory events of everyday life. When we observe
how people live their lives, we discover that they
characterize their experiences from a sensory point of view.
People talk about the intensity or dullness of an image.
When they explain a dream or an event of the prior day,
they use sensory words to characterize the dream’s ele-
ments. Sensation is the common language by which we
share the experience of being human; it provides a com-
Winnie Dunn, PhD, OTR, FAOTA, is Professor and Chair, mon ground for understanding.
Department of Occupational Therapy Education, University of Yet sensation also is so intimate and personal that we
Kansas, 3033 Robinson, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, use it to define our individuality. We describe the difference
Kansas 66160-7602. between one person and another in relation to those per-
This article was accepted for publication July 9, 2001.
sons’ interest in, tolerance for, and pleasure with sensations.
Because of our personal experiences with sensation, it is
608 November/December 2001, Volume 55, Number 6
For instance, we might infer some characteristics about demands of life at different ages expose different aspects of
sensory processing (a newer line of research) from the rela- his or her sensory processing strategies.
tionships we hypothesize to exist between the more estab- Speculating about personality and temperament using
lished temperament and personality literature and sensory insights from the sensory processing literature. We are not lim-
processing. Earlier in the temperament line of research, ited to speculating from the more established personality
some controversy existed about whether temperament and temperament literature to the newer sensory process-
characteristics were stable throughout life and whether ing literature. We can also speculate about developed lines
early temperament characteristics predicted personality of research from newer work.
traits in adulthood (Starratt & Peterson, 1997). The now Some studies have linked sensory processing to cogni-
substantial body of evidence seems to illuminate two tive, behavioral, and psychosocial performance, suggesting
important factors. First, longitudinal studies indicate fairly that linking to temperament and personality also would be
high stability in personality (McCrae, Costa, & Arenberg, fruitful. Baranek et al. (1997a) studied sensory defensive-
1980); even studies that showed some changes reported ness and its relationship to stereotypic behaviors in children
that the fluctuations were small overall (e.g., Eysenck, and adults with developmental disabilities. They reported a
1987). Cross-sectional data on sensory processing traits relationship between tactile defensiveness and rigid, inflex-
provide preliminary evidence that sensory processing pat- ible behavior patterns. Kinnealey and Fuiek (1999) tested
terns are stable across the life span. We might hypothesize adults with sensory defensiveness and found that they were
that sensory processing patterns manifest as do tempera- more anxious and depressed but did not experience more
ment and personality (i.e., that they also are stable across pain than their peers without defensiveness. Stephens and
ages), although our hypothesis needs to be tested explicitly. Royeen (1998) found an inverse relationship between self-
Second, personality and temperament researchers indi- esteem and school-aged children’s responses on the Touch
cate that context can affect the manifestation of one’s per- Inventory for Elementary Children, with increasing levels
sonality traits. Starratt and Peterson, (1997) suggested that of tactile defensiveness correlated with poorer self-esteem.
people may not express their personality traits as strongly in Parham (1998) reported changing relationships between
contexts that have variable relevance for them. Perhaps this cognitive performance at school and sensory processing;
same tendency to express traits differently across contexts reading scores were more highly related in younger grades,
also occurs with one’s pattern of sensory processing. A per- whereas math performance was more highly related in later
son might construct a home environment so that it mini- elementary grades. Kinnealey (1998) reported on a
mizes sensory experiences that are more sensitive, whereas preschooler with sensory defensiveness who also had diffi-
at work the person would have to confront these sensory culty with age-appropriate learning at preschool, anxiety,
challenges. Starratt and Peterson also hypothesized that the and need for control, which affected her school and family
expression of one’s personality traits may change across the relationships.
context of time. Extraverts may express themselves differ- With some association between sensory processing and
ently in their 20s than in their 60s. We see this same phe- psychosocial and cognitive performance, we can consider
nomenon of changes across time with the infants, toddlers, how sensory processing knowledge might inform the tem-
and older adults in the sensory processing data (Dunn & perament work. First, sensory processing evidence informs
Daniels, 2001; Pohl et al., 2001). Perhaps a person’s under- about how to support persons to be successful in their daily
lying sensory processing traits remain the same, and the lives. Although the personality and temperament literature