Rejuvenating Lost and Disused Space With PDF
Rejuvenating Lost and Disused Space With PDF
Rejuvenating Lost and Disused Space With PDF
Drake, Melissa & Guaralda, Mirko (2013) Rejuvenating lost and disused
space within Fortitude Valley : a study into the effectiveness of urban
greenery in subtropical public space. In_Bo: ricerche e progetti per il terri-
torio, la citta e l’architettura, 4(1), pp. 137-157.
c Open Access
MELISSA DRAKE1
DR MIRKO GUARALDA1
1
School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
ABSTRACT: An issue gaining prominence in our urban environments in the notion of lost space, the undesirable urban
areas that are in need of redesign, commonly caused by a focus on development as individual architectural entities,
without a greater view of the urban environment as a holistic entity.
Within the context of South East Queensland, the suburb of Fortitude Valley has been earmarked for development as an
extension of the current CBD. With lost and disused spaces already existing throughout the suburb due to rapid growth
and mismatched developments, recent planning regimes have proposed rejuvenation in the form of proposals that echo
typologies from other Australian regions, such as the laneway typology from Melbourne. Opportunities exist in these
spaces for design approaches that relate specifically to the individual and unique subtropical character of the area.
This research explores the relationship between innovative approaches towards urban greenery as a means to rejuvenate
lost and disused public space, and its suitability within a subtropical climate, specifically focused within the suburb of
Fortitude Valley. A trend gaining prominence is the notion of biophilic cities; cities that integrate urban greenery as a
means to provide vibrant public spaces, and meet the growing aesthetic, social, cultural and economic needs of our cities.
Through analysis of case studies showcasing greenery in an inventive way, observations of public using subtropical
public space, and a discussion of the current policy frameworks at place within Fortitude Valley, innovative uses of urban
greenery is proposed as viable placemaking technique in subtropical urban environments.
Keywords: lost space, disused space, South East Queensland, Fortitude Valley, rejuvenation, subtropical, placemaking,
biophilia, urban greenery, innovative design
“the undesirable urban areas that are in need of redesign The purpose of this study is to decipher the
– antispaces, making no positive contribution to the successfulness of innovative uses of greenery in
surroundings or users” (Trancik 1986, 3). These spaces previously lost or disused spaces, through case study
are typically ill defined, and fail to connect elements in a analyses of proposals against public place theories. These
coherent way. Examples of such spaces are given as case studies are coupled with observations in regards to
surface parking lots, edges of freeways, abandoned the responsiveness of the public to greenery in urban
waterfronts, train yards, deteriorated parks, and forgotten public spaces in an inner city suburb of Brisbane. The
laneways. Lost space can even include lifeless walls of findings of this research contribute towards a greater
buildings, or poor linkages between the ground plane and body of research in aid of a possible development of a
high-rise buildings (Trancik 1986, 3). It is necessary to new framework for the treatment of these lost and
rethink this mono-functional realm of infrastructure, disused spaces in subtropical urban environments, with
discusses Mossop, stating, “it is time to engage with particular focus upon the Fortitude Valley suburb of
these landscapes that have been so poorly served by Brisbane.
design. They have been a kind of shadow city, inhabited
only by default” (2006, 173). EXISTING LITERATURE
Within the context of South East Queensland, the With the increasing urban populations across the
fastest growing region in Australia, fractures are already world, inner city lost space is an essential aspect in
becoming apparent in the inner urban fabric of the capital creating a more compact and collective urban pattern.
city, Brisbane. Whilst some of these ‘lost spaces’ are When discussing urban environments and public spaces,
earmarked for redevelopment and rejuvenation by it is crucial to understand that there is more to a city than
taskforces such as ‘Urban Renewal Brisbane’, design its buildings (Gehl 2010). Streets and in between spaces
approaches commonly lack an ingrained understanding should be spatial entities, rather than what is merely left
of the unique aspects of these lost spaces that could over after the buildings are built. An understanding of the
potentially inform a greater, more sensitive and importance of these public spaces between buildings is
innovative way of use. The subtropical character of these crucial to positive urban design within city environments
environments is sometimes disregarded when in the future. An in-depth background study into urban
approaching the rejuvenation of lost or disused public public space theories, alongside research in regards to
space, in favour for proposals that mimic typologies from biophilic benefits within urban environments, provides
other (climatic) regions in Australia, such as the theoretical insight into successful public spaces and how
Melbourne laneway typology (Feeney 2012). Whilst such these can be enhanced through urban greenery. As
proposals may seem a viable option for the rejuvenation public space plays an important role in the social,
of lost and disused spaces, they lack an embedded environmental and economic fabric of all cities, for a
connection to the specific place, and character of the public place to succeed it is essential the space provide
space itself. appropriate facilitation of the needs of the users, and a
connection to the place in which the public space is
Inspired by a key aspect of subtropical environments, located. For this reason, the following theoretical
vegetation, the notion of incorporating greenery into research is discussed in regards to two greater categories;
urban environments is providing to be a beneficial tool in the needs in public space, and placemaking in public
not only enhancing public space visually, but also within space.
its function. The widespread benefits of greenery in
urban environments has been widely discussed, primarily Needs In Public Space
stemming from the term ‘biophilia’ which refers to the The value of public space as areas for people to use in
hypothesis developed by Edward Wilson in which a magnitude of ways is vital in ensuring public spaces
“nature holds the key to our aesthetic, intellectual, can function to serve societies needs. As discussed by
cognitive and even spiritual satisfaction” (1984). Humans Sieh and Tiesdell, “good places have good connectivity,
seem to have an instinctive connection with other living mixed uses, active frontages and are pedestrian friendly.
systems, becoming a “paradoxical part of the human More than this however, good places are sustainable and
spirit” (1984, 10). This hypothesis has found its way into successful: they are places where people want to live,
the architectural realm as a way to improve the built work, rest, play and invest” (2010, 39). Discussing public
environment. Whilst the incorporation of greenery in space from a human perspective, Sieh and Tiesdell
public spaces is unmistakably already a popular notion, (2010) continue to discuss the symbolic function of
the opportunities involved with incorporating innovative public space, and how value should be placed on these
uses of greenery, particularly into lost and disused space spaces due to the interaction within day-to-day life it
as a placemaking technique, is currently undervalued. facilitates.
http://in_bo.unibo.it 138
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
This notion of designing for the human perspective is promote the use of greenery as a strategic tool,
supported by Carr, Francis, Rivlin and Stone (1992), who particularly within urban environments (Kellert 2005).
discuss the importance of public places functioning to
serve these needs. An understanding of public places,
and their use by people is essential in order to speculate Placemaking in Public Space
and design for such qualities. Carr, et. al. (1992) calls An important aspect of public space design is the
attention to the needs for spaces that are comfortable and structure and underlying dynamic activity; it is crucial to
properly oriented, spaces that account for people’s needs conceptualise fully what the meaning of place within an
in public spaces; focusing predominantly on the areas of urban environment means. The notion of placemaking
comfort, relaxation, passive engagement with the and sensory experience in relation to how one perceives a
environment, active engagement with the environment, space reinforces the importance that activities, events and
and discovery. The place itself must provide the the sites’ relationship to the greater context holds in
stimulation that enables users’ interest to endure for an regards to influencing ones perception.
extended period of time, or the space will fail (Carr et. al.
1992). Gehl (2010) promotes similar ideologies within Jane Jacobs’ ‘The Death and Life of Great American
his discussion of the lively city and the lifeless city. Gehl Cities’ (1961) discusses the notion of placemaking within
states that “life is a city space is all-encompassing: from cities as fuelled by intricate and close-grained diversity
momentary glances to minor events, to the largest of uses that give each other constant, mutual support.
collective manifestations. Walking through common city Urban quality is produced through this mutual
space can be a goal in itself – but also a beginning” relationship, thus the cities are given the capability of
(2010, 29). This supports the notion that there is a crucial providing something for everybody (1961). This layer of
link between the human dimension and how one supported activity within urban environments creates
perceives the general quality of city space. Through the lively, diverse and intense cities, which “contain the
treatment of city edges and to activate street frontages, seeds of their own regeneration, with energy enough to
minor changes that can impact ones perception of a space carry over for problems and needs outside themselves”
can reinstall new life into an urban environment (Gehl (1961, 448). Kevin Lynch discusses this concept
2010). Through renovation of a single space, people are somewhat similarly in ‘The Image of the City’ (1960),
invited to a totally new pattern of use (Gehl 2010). stating that this support network is based upon the
inhabitants individual perceptions. As stated by Lynch,
Urban greenery can be used as a way to respond to “nothing is experienced by itself, but always in relation
this aspect of human perspective; Kaplan, Kaplan and to its surrounding, the sequences of events leading up to
Ryan’s text ‘With People in Mind’ (1998) discusses the it, the memory of past experiences” (1960, 1). Lynch
role of everyday nature as a means to enhance and discusses the notion of individuals producing ‘mental
provide interest in every day life. As discussed by maps’ which use their sense to decipher if a space is
Kaplan, Kaplan and Ryan, “people tend to be fascinated inviting or successful (Lynch 1960). This discussion
with natural processes, such as growth, succession, positions public space as an object that must have some
predation, and even survival itself” (1998, 20). Using meaning to the observer, fuelling further production of
greenery to reinforce the areas of comfort, relaxation, properties that can create such meaning; the use of paths,
passive engagement, active engagement and discovery edges, districts, nodes and landmarks within urban
can help reduce stress and refresh the mind. By providing environments (Lynch 1960). The outcome of Lynch’s
restorative settings experienced through greenery, one discussion is a spaces ability to change, its open-
can recover from the “mental fatigue of urban life” endedness, and the opportunity for individuals to
(Kaplan, Kaplan and Ryan 1998). This notion of “continue to investigate and organise reality” (1960, 9).
restorative benefits is supported by Brengman, Joye,
Willems and Wolf (2009) who discuss the healing effects This notion of a connected network within a city
greenery has upon human individuals. By emotionally environment can be achieved through the incorporation
relating to natural elements in positive ways, the mind is of greenery. As discussed by Wall (1988), landscape
able to refresh and restore the ability to focus and direct within urban environments can be seen as an active
attention (Brengman et.al. 2009). This is also echoed by surface, which structures the conditions for new
Kellert (2005), who documents the diverse psychological relationships and interactions among the things it
and health related benefits of peoples contacts with supports. Wall emphasises the urban surface as dynamic
nature; including reductions in stress, increased peace of and responsive; “like a catalytic emulsion, the surface
mind, enhanced coping mechanisms, improved physical literally unfolds events in time” (1988, 233). Through
fitness and greater creativity levels. With studies looking at urban greenery as a network of connected
showing that green environments are consistently spaces, “it allows for the transformation of the ground-
preferred over non-green urban settings or environments plane into a living, connective tissue between
dominated by artefacts, there is substantial evidence to
increasinglyy disparate fragments and unforeeseen by Beatley “exxperiencing naature in citiess is as muchh
programs” ((1988, 235). aboout hearing, smmelling and fe
feeling as it is about seeing””
(20011, 36). Thiis incorporatiion of sensess is a cruciall
Individuual exploratiion within public spacce is facctor in the creeation and suuccess of publlic spaces. Ass
supported bby Montgomeery’s (1998) discussion
d on what suppported by K Kellert (2005),, biophilic citty design cann
constitutes quality withinn public spacee, and the sennse of im
mprove societyy’s sense of connection, aaffiliation andd
space. Moontgomery diiscusses thatt whilst phyysical attaachment to thhe places theey work and reside; it cann
elements produce urrban qualityy (for exam mple, enhhance peoplee’s physical aand mental connection
c too
architecturaal form, landdmarks, vistass, meeting pllaces, natture and culturre.
etc), the nootion of place is produced tthrough the soocial,
psychologiccal and culturaal dimensionss of a place (1998). Bioophilic Citiess
Based on a correlation of prior studdied conducteed by In order to discuss innoovative methoods of urbann
Jacobs, Gehhl and Lynch,, Montgomeryy outlines the three greeenery integrration, it is essential to discuss how w
crucial asppects that creeate a successsful urban sspace; greeenery has beeen positioned and discussedd in regards too
activity, immage and foorm (refer too Figure 1.)) By urbban environmeents. Previoussly, too much emphasis hass
combining these three crrucial aspects, a sense of pplace, beeen placed upoon open spacee being placedd within urbann
and therefore a diverse annd engaging ppublic space can be envvironments; oopen spaces tthat are only green in thee
created. sennse of being somewhat vegetated. As discussed byy
Tuurner (2005), it is essentiial to create networks off
envvironmentallyy sustainable public
p space thhroughout ourr
urbban environm ments. Biophiilic cities alllows man too
coeexist with natture in an urbban context; “too “ often onee
hass the feeling that our civiilisation is obbliterating thee
nattural environmment” (Turnerr 2005, 275). T Turner (2005))
conntinues to disccuss the imporrtance in eachh space havingg
its own special character; it’ss role within the city, withh
quaalitative ratherr than quantitaative demandss. As stated byy
Keellert (2005, 1223);
“We will nevver achieve ann ethical archiitecture that iss
beaautiful and suustainable unttil nature is inntegral and att
thee core and at tthe substance oof being of the architecture,
b sustainable.
nott added on. Iff it aint beautiiful, it can’t be
Buuildings must sshelter and insspire.”
Nature must be integral too our urban sppaces in orderr
Figure 1. Componentts of a sense of place (Reddrawn to pprovide a spacce full on vitallity, diversity and identity.
from Montggomery 1998, 96)
must be considdered as a critical system
Greenery mu m
witthin our citiees. Spirn (1985) discussess the need too
This anaalogy is suppoorted by Bain, Gray and Rodgers undderstand and design for bboth the naturral ecosystem,
within the book
b ‘Living Streets – Straategies for Craafting andd the social syystem that is driven by culttural, politicall
Public Spacce’ (2012), whho state that pllacemaking spprings andd economic prrocesses. The city’s physicaal environmentt
from underrstanding the llocal conditioons of an areaa, and is the common ground betw ween the naturral ecosystem m
recognisingg the opportuunities that thhe conditionss and andd the culturall, political andd economic pprocesses; it iss
culture can offer. It is thee unique locall culture of a sspace thiis environmeent that beecomes mostt crucial too
that providdes a sense off place, and a setting to w which reiinvigorating uurban space (S Spirn 1985). Landscape
L hass
inhabitants can centre themselves (Bain, Grey and com me to encom mpass much m more than simmple parks orr
Rodgers 20012). Bain, G Gray and Roddgers (2012) place garrdens; engaginng disused spaace and the exxploding needss
emphasis uupon placemakking incorporaating the abiliity to of the populationn - landscape is replacing aarchitecture ass
cultivate coonnectedness; the interchaange of ideass and thee basic buildding block oof contemporary urbanism m
shared expeerience bringss vibrancy to a place. As public
p (W
Waldheim, 2006).
spaces are “important hhearts of civicc life” (2012,, 22),
emphasis shhould be placeed upon the connection bettween Literature suuggests that nature
n holds the power inn
inhabitants and the phhysical city itself,i as weell as hellping humanisse and reinviggorate distresssed cities andd
between thee people in it. buiilt environmeents, whilst stiill bringing oout the best inn
hummanity. As sstated by Keellert, “despitee the evidentt
Urban greenery
g can provide
p opporttunities for sennsory connnections, conntemporary soociety still faills to recognisee
experiencess within the uurban environm
ment. As discuussed andd defend the iimportance off healthy and ddiverse naturall
http://in_bo.unibo.it 140
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
systems too sustaining the quality of o people’s lives, Vaalley suburb, which is in just j as much,, if not more,
i urban areaas” (2005, 3). It is these sppaces
especially in neeed of rejuvenaation (Calligeeros 2009). W
Whilst there aree
surroundingg buildings and streets that presentt the othher regeneration schemes ffor the suburbb of Fortitudee
opportunityy to inject andd insert naturaal elements. Whilst
W Vaalley, these ddo not place emphasis on the lost andd
it becomes increasingly difficult to reeimage the exiisting dissused spacess scattered throughout the suburb.
hard surfaces of our buillt environmennts as opportunnities Prooposals that nnurture the individual ideentity of eachh
for insertingg green life, oopportunities exist
e in verticaal and spaace are necesssary to ensure vibrant spacess that embracee
horizontal surfaces to infuse natuure. Green w walls, thee subtropical nature
n of the reegion.
elevated eenvironments and sidewaalks provide the
possibility of reintegratioon of greeneryy in urban setttings Identity, in conjunction w with understannding the usee
where it is least expecteed in society’s lost and dissused of the space is paramount inn this researcch area; whenn
spaces, prooducing profouund positive iimpacts withinn our disscussing lost sspace within tthe urban enviironment, it iss
urban enviironments thaat respond diistinctively too the exttremely important to uunderstand thhe differencee
context of eeach space (Keellert 2005). bettween lost sppace and disuused space. W Whilst disusedd
spaace may displaay similar quaalities to lost sspace, they aree
CH CONTEX
RESEARC XT: FORTIT
TUDE VALLE
EY stilll providing a functional aaspect to the uurban quality,
thuus are crucial to the urban ffabric. Disusedd spaces, suchh
In the context
c of the South East Q
Queensland reegion, as laneways, muust be considerred with utmost diligence too
there have been recentt initiatives tto rejuvenatee and proovide spaces tthat display a sense of identtity and place,
revitalise ooverlooked and forgotten sppaces in Brissbane. whhilst still perfoorming their fuunctions.
The ‘Vibraant Lanewayss and Small Spaces’ proggram,
initiated byy Urban Rennewal Brisbanne, aims to ccreate
places thaat celebrate the creativee arts, improves
pedestrian access withinn the city cenntre, and prommotes
shopping, ddining, mixinng and minglling (BCC 22011).
Whilst this scheme can be faulted forr only focusinng on
the lanewayy typology, iit is a distinct step forwarrd for
discussions relating to lost and disuused space inn the
context of SSouth East Quueensland.
Figure 3. L
Lost and Dissused Space iin Fortitude Valley
V
http://in_bo.unibo.it 142
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
Figgure 5. China T
Town Mall (The Lighting Societty, 2011).
http://in_bo.unibo.it 144
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
Relationship - Emphaasises the histoory of the disttrict thee night to avoid apprehension or termiination of thee
to - Recallls the originnal purpose oof the acttivity from leggal forces (Migguel 2009).
Surroundinggs neighboourhood (artisans and
craftspeerson’s) Guerrilla garrdening aims to understandd the use of a
- Restoores connectiions to the past spaace, or the com
mmunity wherre it is locatedd, to ensure thee
purposees in the archess of the viaducct outtcome is a spaace that is useaable, successfu
ful and tailoredd
- Createes vistas and uunique connecctions to the communitty’s needs. Thhe incorporatioon of biophilicc
to neigghbouring buiildings, comm monly priinciples alongg with comm munity garden initiatives inn
unseen from street level, enhanncing somme projects eensures the gguerrilla gardeening projectss
experiennces and relatiionships proovide multifacceted benefits to the greater community.
Psychologiccal - Heighht and purposee of the Promeenade
Dimensionss Plantée enhances thee “escape” nnotion
associatted
- Biopphilic elemennts enhance this;
psychollogically rejuvvenates and reelaxes
those who visit
- Visitoors can becom me removed from
ever dayy life; findingg joy in naturaalistic
environm ment
Social - Multtiple uses hhelps connecctions
Dimensionss betweenn locals and toourists
- Ownerrship felt by alla members oof the
communnity
- Improoved communiication througgh the
positivee feelings the ssuccess generaates
Cultural - Suppports the rom mantic stereootype
Dimensionss associatted with the Paris environnment
and cultture Figgure 7. Guerrillla Gardening inn Toronto (Miguuel, 2009).
- Recallls and recreattes the presennce of
artisans; enhances coommunity charracter
and idenntity Puublic Space Neeeds
- Culturre enhanced tthrough contraast of Coonnectivity - Restores what was previously a
what used to be, and what
w it now iss disused spaace into som mething whichh
Interchangee of - The suuccess of the public
p realm aallows serves the grreater communnity
Ideas / greater and more open connecctions - Perceived connection tto communityy
Experiencess betweenn members of the communitty through indivviduals workiing together too
- Sharedd experiential values througgh the make somethhing of a derellict space
popularity of the greeenway Miixture of - Designs coommonly provvide more thann
Sensory - Greennery elementts respond too all Usses one purposse to the space; eg.
Experience sensory experiences; the smell, toouch, Reinvigorating a bus stop to incorporatee
taste, soound and sightt. gardens, food, or activity centres
c for thee
local commuunity
Stiimulation - Many desiigns incorporaate strange orr
Guerrilla G Gardening, W Worldwide unique adapptations to previous
p use;
Guerrillla gardening is a worlldwide moveement allows userss to think andd interact withh
gaining popularity throuugh the reinvvigoration of land the spaces
owned byy another inndividual (moost commonnly a - Greeneryy enhancess the userr
governmentt organisationn). Guerrilla gardeners diisplay experience through biiophilic typee
motivation from a varriety of areaas, predominnantly connections
political or health relatedd, developing the movemennt into - Stimulates individualss to becomee
a form of prroactive activiism (Khankhooje 2007). better connnected with their ownn
community
Most guuerrilla gardeening cases innvolve an areea of Inggrained - Sites are generally reefurbished byy
land that haas become derrelict due to a misunderstannding Unnderstanding local membeers of the com mmunity whoo
of ownershhip or a disreggard for the puurpose of the land. of Use understand tthe needs off those in thee
Due to the movement beeing considereed illegal, gueerrilla area
gardeners ppredominantlyy reinvigorate the spaces dduring - Designs allso respond tto the lack off
http://in_bo.unibo.it 146
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
ownershhip in some spaces, using hardy h parrallel parking spaces alongg streets. Now
w appearing inn
plants too flourish morre successfullyy maany cities acrross the worldd, including tthe Australiann
Human - Use oof space creaates and enhaances cityy of Adelaaide, Parkletss display aan innovativee
Dimension experiennces for the geeneral public reffashioning off use within underused sppaces throughh
- Purpoose is to prodduce more viibrant insstallations thaat are not alw
ways necessariily permanentt
spaces ffor the greaterr community (Paavement to Paarks 2012).
- Respoonds to the hum man mind; positive
outcomees create posittive outlooks This mobile aspect of Paarklets designn provides ann
Renovationn of - Key criteria
c for selection of spacces is intteresting case study into hhow to ensuree some spacess
Use if it is ddeteriorating orr lost thaat may be lost or disused, buut still require some form off
- All deesign reinvigoorate the use oof the acccess (such as laneways)
l cann be reinvigoraated for publicc
space, sometimes ppaying homagge to usee in a way thaat does not incconvenience tthe underlyingg
what it oonce was usee of the spacee. The tempoorary nature oof the Parkletss
- Creatiing somethingg beautiful whhere it alsso provides ann opportunity for creative anda innovativee
otherwiise may not occcur thiinking from a variety of individuals w who may nott
alwways have the opportunityy to design a public placee
Placemakin ng Techniquees witthin an urban environment.
Web of - Facilittates a web ofo guerrilla gaarden
Diversity spaces aacross a widerr community; may
not havve a specific web of diveersity
within thet one project, but playys an
integral part in the greater gueerrilla
gardeninng scheme
Relationship - Spacees are generaally revitaliseed by
to members of the comm munity who feeel the
Surroundinggs space is in need of hellp
- Designns are sensitivve and relate tto the
communnity and widerr environment
Psychologiccal - Biophiilic principless are beneficiial to
Dimensionss communnity memberss, as well ass the
guerrillaa gardeners
- Throuugh integratinng ‘green’ beeauty, Figgure 8. Parklet in San Franciscco (Mission Disstrict, 2012).
psycholoogically one feeels closer to ppeace
Puublic Space Neeeds
Social - Enhannces the comm munity’s feelinng of
Coonnectivity - Enhances connection between thee
Dimensionss purpose,, or what couldd be achieved
street and coommercial dw wellings; pullss
- Aims tto create viablle spaces for aall, in
public aspects into a ppredominantlyy
a very puublic realm
private atmoosphere
Cultural - Promottes a utopian vvision of socieety
- Creates a ggreater networkk / connectionn
Dimensionss - Respoonds to the direct needs oof the
to Parklets accross the city
culture iin question asa it is createed by
- Connecttion improvve betweenn
individuuals
communitiess and businessses
Interchangee - Guerrilla gardeningg can incorpporate
Miixture of - Supportss both bussinesses andd
of Ideas / greater messages annd notions; uusing
Usses communitiess through prooviding spacee
Experiencess greeneryy as a tool to communnicate
that enhancces the environment, itss
values or beliefs
purpose and the economy.
- Creattes a greateer, more hoolistic
- Purpose off the Parklets ccan vary fromm
connectiion betweeen those in
something reelatively comm mercialised, too
neighbouurhoods, localls feel like theey are
a Parklet thhat promotes solitude in a
making a change towaards a better fuuture
community eenvironment
Sensory - Biophhilic elements respond too all
Stiimulation - The uniquue nature off the Parkletss
Experience sensory experiences; the smell, toouch,
stimulates tthe mind, innspiring moree
taste, souund and sight of the greenerry.
innovative ssolutions to sspaces peoplee
commonly ooverlook
Inggrained - Mobile Parklets unnderstand thee
Parklets, SSan Franciscoo
Unnderstanding requirementss of some diisused spaces,
Parkletss originated w
within San Franncisco as a w
way to
of Use and the seervice requirrements theyy
revitalise sstreet life thrrough refashiioning the usse of
http://in_bo.unibo.it 148
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
Greater body of public appear to sit and into the key policy aspects behind Urban
contemplate in the China Town Mall when Renewal Brisbane; and
compared to the Brunswick Street Mall. Earmarking and discussion of possible
Sitting locations of the public, including integration and installation of such initiatives in
smokers, tend to be around key greenery areas, specific lost and / or disused space in Fortitude
most likely due to lack of exposure to the main Valley.
thoroughfare path
Despite the western end being a shared traffic Determined through the case study analysis of a
zone, the public gather near greenery elements variety of innovative approaches towards lost and
on the outskirts. disused space, it has been found that urban greenery is a
Patrons dining outside of restaurants and bars, relevant approach towards rejuvenating dense inner city
when given the choice tend to sit closer to lost space. Integration of greenery into public spaces
planter boxes, despite these locations being helps meet various principles of successful public space
closer to the main public thoroughfare design, particularly within the aspect of placemaking,
Public travelling through the Mall tend to walk whilst also incorporating the benefits associated purely
along the outskirts, in areas shaded by greenery with greenery on its own (‘biophilia’). The
or sculptural devices. psychological, social and cultural benefits associated
with greenery improve the public’s perceptions of the
Public tend to be attracted to areas with larger
public space, creating unique, successful and relevant
trees (providing shade), than shorter and smaller
public space design. Innovative uses of lost or disused
landscaping.
space must be sensitive to the space’s previous purpose,
as well as the local community’s needs, in order for an
enhanced connection to occur. The human connection
with greenery has the ability to enhance ones relationship
to public space. Through incorporating greenery into
public space, in conjunction with the already established,
ingrained relationship between humans and greenery
outlined within the biophilia hypothesis, meaningful
spaces that provide innovative approaches can transpire.
Opportunities exist in these spaces for more meaningful
relationships across a variety of urban scales, with spatial
and experiential qualities that are immeasurable to the
user.
Integration and Relationship to Fortitude Valley It has been found that these laneway approaches
Policy Framework undervalue the opportunities associated with lost and
As discussed previously within the body of research, disused space in Brisbane, focusing predominantly on
Fortitude Valley is currently earmarked for development simplistic outcomes that do not effectively create a
as a continuation of the Brisbane CBD, and is currently relationship to the individual context of each site. By
undergoing urban regeneration projects that enhance the using greenery as a technique to achieve and enhance
urban environment associated with Fortitude Valley. placemaking within these urban spaces, frameworks can
Whilst there are several ‘laneway’ proposals for be improved to provide more social, economically and
Fortitude Valley, these are still currently under physically sustainable urban spaces. The following
construction. For this reason, Brisbane’s first rejuvenated discussion aims to first discuss how these innovative
and now functioning laneway, Burnett Lane, has been ideas can be integrated within the current framework in
briefly analysed against the case study framework to Fortitude Valley, and to also outline some opportunities
pinpoint which aspects of public space are currently within the suburb for these proposals.
lacking in these developments.
Urban Regeneration Brisbane (URB), the taskforce
Public Space Needs behind urban regeneration schemes within the inner 5
Connectivity - Creates a connection between Albert Street kilometres of Brisbane, are responsible for preparing
and George Street; a link which was strategies and planning frameworks that embody
previously unusable by the public “sustainable urban design right through from the
Mixture of Uses - Predominantly provides hospitality
overarching urban structure, down to neighbourhood
functions (cafes, etc), alongside the key
access use.
level and local placemaking” (Urban Renewal Brisbane
Stimulation - Use of different colours and artworks to 2011, 6). The following discussion aims to;
provide stimulation
Ingrained - Sometimes misunderstands why the public Examine the existing URB framework, which
Understanding would use the space; still places too much has informed such policies as the ‘Fortitude
of Use emphasis on the access purpose of the Valley Neighbourhood Plan’ and the ‘Vibrant
laneway, stamping out other users at times. Laneways and Small Spaces Program’;
- Lacks innovation in finding a way to take Determine the similarities between the strategies
advantage of the unique climate in Brisbane of the URB framework, and the outputs of urban
Human - Space is designed around truck and car greenery initiatives as found within this body of
Dimension access (despite this only being needed for a
research; and
few hours each day), and at times lacks the
human perspective. Propose innovative urban greenery approaches
Renovation of - The space has not necessarily been as an initiative to meet the requirements of the
Use renovated; just made more accessible. The URB strategies, with basic proposals for urban
original purpose is still associated. greenery initiatives moving forward.
http://in_bo.unibo.it 150
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
With thhe key them mes within U URB’s frameework innnovative instaallations withhin Fortitudee Valley thatt
displaying strong correlaations to the aanalysis frameework resspond to the aforementionedd needs currenntly lacking inn
used withinn this body off research, it can
c be stated (from
( thee URB framew work. Using pprevious mappping studies off
the findinggs presented within this paper) that urban u losst and disuseed space in Fortitude Vaalley, variouss
greenery is capable of prroviding posittive and succeessful loccations for such installaations have been noted.
solutions too the strategiees outlined. W
Whilst schemees are Loocations have bbeen determinned based on tthe underlyingg
generally exxecuted by deesign and plannning agenciess (and purrpose of the sppace – whetheer it is commuunity oriented,
sometimes altered in favour of larger oorganisations,, over a sspace which rrequired vehiccular movemeent, or a spacee
the needs ofo the communnity), opportuunities arise foor the witth historic rrelevance. Whilst
W these spaces notedd
inhabitants of Fortitudde Valley too be inspiredd by proovide opportuunities for insstallations simmilar to thosee
innovative greenery usees – promotiing a new, place disscussed within the case sstudies, it is important too
specific typpology of use. Urban greeneery, in a subtroopical undderstand that these are genneric examplees that can bee
environmennt, provides paarticular outcoomes that reprresent altered and imprroved to ensurre the individuual qualities off
strong perssonal relationsships betweenn the user and the eacch site are connsidered. It is proposed thatt the exampless
environmennt. The use of greenery as an innovvative sugggested be uused as a baasic guide onn the type off
proposal foor reinvigorating lost space supports U URB’s insstallation, witth more reseearch developped into thee
strategy too consolidatee and strenggthen inner urban u inddividual needss and context of the site (refer to Figuree
environmennts through appropriatee, site speecific 11)).
developmennts.
This researcch article prrovides a fooundation forr
The appproaches to llost space ouutlined in the case insspiration and formulation oof possibilities surroundingg
study analyysis provide ssome possiblee opportunitiees for thee integration oof innovative urban
u greeneryy installations..
Case study exemplars can provide a starting point for or disused space in Fortitude Valley, time and funding
innovative greenery installations. Laneways provide constraints prevent this from occurring. Instead, basic
opportunities for reinvigoration through the incorporation propositions for lost space “types” have been noted.
of Parklets, which have been designed to facilitate the
unique and specific needs of the laneway. Practical Implications for Further Research
aspects, such as servicing needs are able to be facilitated The findings of this study provide many opportunities
through the mobile aspect of the greenery initiative. for further study. Whilst innovative use of greenery has
Historical structures, such as the walls of existing proven to be successful in many cases, it may not be
heritage buildings provide opportunities to enhance the entirely appropriate in some climates. Further studies
unique, mix matched architecture within Fortitude Valley into how the public use public space in relation to
through the contrast of greenery. Vacant green spaces greenery elements could be undertaken in different
and corner sites have the chance to be revived through climates, to provide a wider range of analysis for
small community gardens that improve the residents’ comparison. Whilst this study maps current lost and
perception and relationship to the site. Endless disused space in Fortitude Valley, additional study could
opportunities exist to revitalise, rejuvenate and inspire a further analyse the specific needs of particular lost spaces
new urban life in Fortitude Valley. Creating a sense of in Fortitude Valley. This analysis could help develop a
place through greenery techniques provides valuable framework for establishing where varying levels of
opportunities to enhance social, political and innovative greenery initiatives could occur.
environmental aspects associated with dense urban
environments. With imminent redevelopment and rejuvenation on
the horizon for the Fortitude Valley suburb, it is essential
that vibrant public spaces are provided for the greater
CONCLUSION community; public spaces that understand the underlying
use, place and purpose of each individual space, and its
This research study has aimed to provide an relationship to the greater community. Opportunities
exploration into the use of greenery as a placemaking exist in the lost and disused spaces of subtropical urban
tool, with particular focus on innovative uses of greenery environments across the world for innovative approaches
and its ability to reinvigorate lost and disused space. that enhance the natural, subtropical environment of the
Through the examination of case studies and region. With renovation of these spaces through the
observations of the public in subtropical public space, incorporation of greenery, people are invited to
relationships between the impact of greenery within experience these spaces in an entirely new and
subtropical environments, and the success of innovative stimulating pattern of use, creating lively spaces that
approaches towards lost and disused space design has benefit the greater community physically, socially,
been established. With vegetation seen as a key attribute economically and mentally.
in subtropical public space, using greenery as a solution
to poor public space design provides opportunities for
future proposals. Analysis of current Fortitude Valley
policy frameworks has provided an understanding of how
innovative urban greenery initiatives can succeed in
meeting these strategies. Mapping of lost and disused
spaces in Fortitude Valley, in conjunction with
opportunities for possible installations in such spaces,
based on the analysis and information presented within
this body of research, aims to create a wider public
discussion in regards to the future of these under looked
spaces and how they can be reinvigorated for public use.
Limitations
Due to the limited time constraints associated with
this study, this research has been strictly limited to
ensure only appropriate depth into the chosen field of
study. Observations and research focuses predominantly
on the relationship between the use of public space and
urban greenery, thus in turn neglects other urban design
elements, such as street furniture, materials, shading
devices and so forth. Whilst it would also be beneficial to
physically apply the outcomes and findings of this
research in a detailed, physical design proposal for a lost
http://in_bo.unibo.it 152
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
REFERENCES plantee/rub_8212_stand_34230_port_18987
MIGUEL, S. (2009). Guerrilla Gardening Development Blog.
BAIN, L., B. GRAY AND D. RODGERS. (2012). Living Accessed October 5, 2012.
Streets – Strategies for Crafting Public Space. New Jersey: http://guerrillagardening.wordpress.com/2009/05/17/my-first-
John Wiley and Sons. time-doing-real-life-guerrilla-gardening/
BCC (BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL). (2011). “Vibrant MISSION DISTRICT. (2012). Parklets Tour of San Francisco.
laneways and small spaces”. Accessed May 2, 2012. Accessed June 18, 2012. http://sf.funcheap.com/parklets-tour-
http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/planning-building/current- san-francisco-mission-dist/
planning-projects/neighbourhood-planning/neighbourhood- MONTGOMERY, J. (1998). “Making a City: Urbanity,
plans-in-your-area/brisbane-city-centre-master-plan/completed- Vitality and Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 3 (1): 93-
projects/vibrant-laneways-small-spaces/index.htm. 116.
BEATLEY, T. (2011). Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into MOSSOP, E. (2006). “Landscapes of Infrastructure”. In The
Urban Design and Planning. Washington D.C.: Island Press. Landscape Urbanism Reader, edited by Charles Waldheim,
BLASER, S. (2009). La Promenade Plantée: Walk on Air! 153-177. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Accessed June 18, 2012. http://hipparis.com/2009/12/08/le- MUMFORD, L. (1989). The city in history: its origins, its
promenade-plantee-walk-on-air/ transformations, and its prospects. San Diego: Harcourt Brace
BRENGMAN, M., J. YANNICK, K. WILLEMS AND K. & Co.
WOLF. (2009). "The effects if urban retail greenery on ON TOPIC MEDIA. (2012). Brunswick Street. Accessed
consumer experience: Reviewing the evidence from a October 5, 2012.
restorative perspective." Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 9 http://brisbane.diarystar.com.au/brunswick-street/
(1): 57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.10.001. PAVEMENT TO PARKS. (2012). Parklets. Accessed July 28,
CALLIGEROS, M. (2009). “Valley needs Vibrant Laneways 2012. http://sfpavementtoparks.sfplanning.org/parklets.html
too”. Brisbane Times, October 7. Accessed May 2, 2012. SIEH, L. AND S. TIESDELL. (2010). "Urban design and
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/entertainment/your- planning: challenges and opportunities." Urban Design and
brisbane/valley-needs-vibrant-laneways-too-20091006- Planning 163 (1): 39-40. Accessed February 23, 2012. doi:
gl95.html 10.1680/udap.2010.163.1.39.
CARR, S., M. FRANCIS, L. G. RIVLIN AND A. M. STONE. SPIRN, A.W. (1985). The Granite Garden: Urban Nature and
(1992). "Needs in public space". In Urban Design Reader, Human Design. New York: Basic Books.
edited by Matthew Carmona and Steve Tiesdell, 230-240. THE LIGHTING SOCIETY. (2011). China Town Mall
Oxford: Architectural Press. Redevelopment. Accessed October 5, 2012.
FARQUHARSON, V. (2009). “Laneways: next frontier”. http://www.iesanz.org/about/iesanz-news/2011/china-town-
Leader Post, September 12. Accessed May 2, 2012. mall-redevelopment-fortitude-valley/
http://gateway.library.qut.edu.au/login?url=http://search.proque TRANCIK, R. (1986). Finding Lost Space; Theories of Urban
pr.com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/docview/350115540?accountid Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
=13380 TURNER, T. (1995). "Greenways, blueways, skyways and
FEENEY, K. 2012. “The between streets of your town”. other ways to a better London." Landscape and Urban
Brisbane Times, March 2. Accessed July 18, 2012. Planning 33 (1): 269-282.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/entertainment/restaurants- URBAN RENEWAL BRISBANE. (2011). Urban Renewal
and-bars/the-between-streets-of-your-town-20120302- Brisbane – 20 Years. Accessed October 3, 2012.
1u7pi.html http://www.aila.org.au/aaud/2011/BCC/index.pdf
GEHL, J. 2010. Cities for People. Washington D.C.: Island WALDHEIM, C., ed. (2006). The Landscape Urbanism
Press. Reader. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
GUARALDA, M. AND M. KOWALIK. (2011). "Mapping WALL, A. (1988). “Programming the Urban Surface.” In
resilience: A framework for changing cities." In Proceedings of Recovering Landscape, edited by James Corner, 233-249. New
the 4th International Urban Design Conference, edited by York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Sarah Hoekwater, 102-113. Gold Coast: AST Management Pty WILSON, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard
Ltd. University Press.
JACOBS, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American
Cities. New York: Random House.
KAPLAN, R., S. KAPLAN AND R. L. RYAN. (1998). With
People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature.
Washington D.C.: Island Press.
KELLERT, S. (2005). Building for Life: Designing and
Understanding the Human-Nature Connection. Washington
D.C.: Island Press.
KHANKHOJE, M. (2007). Guerrilla Gardening: A
Manualfesto. Accessed August 28, 2012.
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2007/09/guerrilla-
garde.html
LYNCH, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Massachusetts: MIT
Press.
MAIRIE DE PARIS. (2012). Promenade Plantée. Accessed
July 28, 2012. http://www.paris.fr/english/parks-woods-
gardens-and-cemeteries/gardens/promenade-
APPENDIX 1
PROMENADE PLANTÉE
Personal Reviews ARTICLE ALLEY. (2012). Promenade Plantée. Accessed September 3, 2012.
http://riteborges.articlealley.com/promenade-plante-2403722.html
BLASER, S. (2009). La Promenade Plantée: Walk on Air! Accessed June 18, 2012.
http://hipparis.com/2009/12/08/le-promenade-plantee-walk-on-air/
LLANWARNE, A. (2010). Promenade Plantée, Paris, France. Accessed August 25,
2012.http://www.walkingstories.com/story_details.cfm/story_ID/250/menu_ID/2/title/
Promenade_Plantee_Paris_France
LONELY PLANET. (2010). The Promenade Plantée in Paris. Accessed September
28, 2012. http://www.lonelyplanet.com/thorntree/thread.jspa?threadID=1916765
TRIP ADVISOR. (2012). Promenade Plantée. Accessed August 20, 2012.
http://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g187147-d652872-Reviews-
Promenade_plantee-Paris_Ile_de_France.html
General Resources ABRAHAMS, T. (2012). Viaducts: new urban encounters. Accessed August 30, 2012.
http://www.architonic.com/ntsht/viaducts-new-urban-encounters/7000516
CAMPBELL, R. (2002). "A Paris Match? Boston Can Learn Something About
Creating New Civic Space from the City of Light." The Boston Globe, March 12.
Accessed June 14, 2012.
http://www.boston.com/beyond_bigdig/cases/paris/index.shtml
CLEMENS, M. (2000). "Three Green Miles: A Planted Promenade Provides a Linear
Greenspace for Eastern Paris." Landscape Architecture 90 (2)): 58-65.
MAIRIE DE PARIS. (2012). Promenade Plantée. Accessed July 28, 2012.
http://www.paris.fr/english/parks-woods-gardens-and-cemeteries/gardens/promenade-
plantee/rub_8212_stand_34230_port_18987
URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. (2011). How Others Did It. Accessed
August 26, 2012. http://www.ura.gov.sg/railcorridor/ideas/ideas.htm
VAN DER VELDE, R. (2012). Tag Archives: Promenade Plantée. Accessed October
2, 2012. http://howdoyoulandscape.wordpress.com/tag/promenade-plantee/
Blog Entries CARLSON, A. (2012). Catacombs, Sacre Coeur, Promenade Plantée, and more!
Accessed September 3, 2012.
http://downeasteralexa218.blogspot.com.au/2012/09/catacombs-sacre-coeur-
promenade-plantee.html
HORTON, R. P. (2011). The High Line’s French Ancestor: La Promenade Plantée.
Accessed August 26, 2012. http://www.urbangardensweb.com/2011/09/23/the-high-
lines-french-ancestor-la-promenade-plantee/
JANS, M. (2012). Promenade Plantée. Accessed October 5, 2012.
http://marthajans.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/promenade-plantee.html
ROCHELEAU, S. (2012). Gay Paree. Accessed August 20, 2012.
https://rockyontheroad.wordpress.com/tag/promenade-plantee/
SPURR, K. (2012). Paris Trip Journal: A Walk Along the Promenade Plantée.
Accessed August 30, 2012. http://bitesizedtravel.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/paris-
trip-journal-a-walk-along-the-promenade-plantee/
Articles EXPLOGUIDE. (2012). La Promenade Plantée Park. Accessed October 2, 2012.
http://www.exploguide.com/explo/la-promenade-plantee-park-paris-12
HURWITZ, S. (2012). Promenade Plantée is One of Paris’ Best Kept Secrets.
http://in_bo.unibo.it 154
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
GUERRILLA GARDENING
Articles GREEN, M. (2008). Guerrilla Gardeners: When Push Comes To Shovel. Accessed
August 18, 2012. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Guerrilla-gardeners-When-
push-comes-to-shovel-3289216.php
KHANKHOJE, M. (2007). Guerrilla Gardening: A Manualfesto. Accessed August 28,
2012. http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2007/09/guerrilla-garde.html
SALTMARSH, N. (2010). Guerrilla Gardening for Sustainable Cities. Accessed
August 23, 2012. http://sd.defra.gov.uk/2010/03/guerilla-gardening-for-sustainable-
cities/
SPOTTED BY LOCALS. (2012). Guerrilla Gardening – Brightening the city streets.
Accessed September 20, 2012. http://www.spottedbylocals.com/blog/guerilla-
gardening-brightening-the-city-streets/
General Resources BRACE, B. (2012). A Bed for the Guerrilla Gardener; Questioning Public Space and
Challenged Land. Accessed September 3, 2012.
http://www.academia.edu/1258372/A_bed_for_the_guerrilla_gardener_questioning_p
ublic_space_and_challenged_land
CRANE, A. (2011). “Intervening with agriculture: a participatory action case study of
guerrilla gardening in Kingston, Ontario.” Thesis diss., Queens University Department
of Environmental Studies. Accessed June 14, 2012.
http://www.queensu.ca/ensc/undergraduate/courses/ensc501-
2/pastprojects502/CraneENSC502.pdf
HARDMAN, M. (2011). Understanding Guerilla Gardening: an exploration of illegal
cultivation in the UK. Birmingham: Birmingham City University. Accessed June 14,
2012.
http://www.bcu.ac.uk/_media/docs/CESR_Working_Paper_1_2011_Hardman.pdf
POWERS, A. (2012). “Guerrilla gardening.” The Architectural Review 231 (1382):
96.
ZANETTI, O. (2007). “Guerrilla Gardening. Georaphers and Gardeners, Actors and
Networks: Reconsidering Urban Public Space.” MA/MSc diss. Accessed June 14,
2012. http://www.guerrillagardening.org/books/ZanettiGG.pdf
Blog Entries BRIDGE CITY GUERRILLA GARDENERS. (2012). Month in Review. Accessed
October 3, 2012. http://bridgecityguerrillagardens.wordpress.com
GWEN, Z. (2012). Guerrilla Gardening. Accessed October 5, 2012.
http://nphile.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/guerilla-gardening/
LUNDBERG, J. (2009). Guerrilla Gardening Gets Going. Accessed September 20,
2012. http://www.culturechange.org/cms/content/view/496/65/
MIGUEL, S. (2009). Guerrilla Gardening Development Blog. Accessed October 5,
2012. http://guerrillagardening.wordpress.com/2009/05/17/my-first-time-doing-real-
life-guerrilla-gardening/
URBAN TRAVEL BLOG. (2012). Guerrilla Gardening London. Accessed September
23, 2012. http://www.urbantravelblog.com/green/guerilla-gardening
Personal Reviews POPVILLE. (2012). Dear PoPville – What are your thoughts on guerrilla gardeners?
Accessed October 5, 2012. http://www.princeofpetworth.com/2012/03/dear-popville-
what-are-your-thoughts-on-guerilla-gardeners/
PARKLETS
Articles BREEN, M. (2012). Parklets Here, Parklets There. Accessed October 5, 2012.
http://www.otheravenues.coop/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/summer2012final-1.pdf
CARROLL, R. (2012). The Mini Parks That Could Transform Los Angeles.
Accessed September 5, 2012. http://www.psfk.com/2012/09/mini-parks-los-
angeles.html
GILLIES, B. (2012). Pop-up Parklets Help Beautify Neighbourhoods. Accessed
September 30, 2012. http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2012/09/pop-up-parklets-help-
beautify-neighbourhoods/
HENRY, S. (2012). Berkeley hopes to emulate San Francisco with Creation of
Parklets. Accessed September 24, 2012.
http://blog.sfgate.com/inberkeley/2012/08/31/berkeley-hopes-to-emulate-san-
francisco-with-creation-of-parklets/
NICHOLS, C. (2012). Roads and Rails: Roads to Give Way to ‘Parklets’ in LA.
Accessed September 25, 2012.
http://www.nctimes.com/blogsnew/news/transportation/roads-rails-roads-to-give-
way-to-parklets-in-l/article_ffe7c6dc-2ad1-59cb-98cd-f2aa032233f5.html
PATTON, Z. (2012). Parklets: The Next Big Tiny Idea in Urban Planning. Accessed
August 23, 2012. http://www.governing.com/topics/energy-env/gov-parklets-next-
big-idea-in-urban-planning.html
SHARPE, A. (2012). Parklets and Plazas. Accessed October 6, 2012.
http://www.generocity.org/2012/parklets-and-plazas-university-city-district/
SHYONG, F. (2012). L.A. Council Oks pilot program to turn parking spots into
‘Parklets’. Accessed September 8, 2012.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/08/council-votes-to-test-program-that-
turns-parking-spots-into-tiny-parklets.html
General Resources ADELAIDE CITY COUNCIL. (2012). Come and experience a Parklet. Accessed
October 4, 2012. http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/media-centre/media-
releases/come-and-experience-a-parklet/
BERG, N. (2010). “From Parking to ‘Parklets’.” Planning 76 (6): 5.
MAYOR’S OFFICE OF TRANSPORT AND UTILITIES. (2012). The Power of
Parklets. Accessed June 14, 2012. http://phillymotu.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/the-
power-of-parklets/
PRATT, L. (2010). Divisadero Trial Parklet Impact Report. Accessed June 14, 2012.
http://sfgreatstreets.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/DivisaderoReportPart1.pdf
SAN FRANCISCO GREAT STREETS PROJECTS. (2012). Parklets. Accessed June
14, 2012. http://sfgreatstreets.org/parklets/
PAVEMENT TO PARKS. (2012). Parklets. Accessed July 28, 2012.
http://sfpavementtoparks.sfplanning.org/parklets.html
STUDIO ONE ELEVEN. (2012). Parklets. Accessed August 28, 2012.
http://carlsbad-village.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Studio111-
ParkletPresentation.pdf
JENSEN, S. (2012). Parklets. Accessed September 28, 2012.
http://www.wrtdesign.com/offsite/91
MISSION DISTRICT. (2012). Parklets Tour of San Francisco. Accessed June 18,
2012. http://sf.funcheap.com/parklets-tour-san-francisco-mission-dist/
Blog Entries MOORCROFT, S. (2012). Small Scale Green Spaces Can Pack a Big Punch in
Cities. Accessed October 10, 2012.
http://in_bo.unibo.it 156
Ricerche e progetti per il territorio, THE PUBLIC SPACE OF EDUCATION | M. Guaralda
la città e l’architettura SPECIAL ISSUE #1/2013
http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2012/09/26/small-scale-green-spaces-can-
pack-a-big-punch-in-cities/
MOTU, P. (2012). Parklets are Popping up all around. Accessed September 3, 2012.
http://phillymotu.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/parklets-are-popping-up-all-around-
philadelphia/
OPEN. (2012). Asheville’s Creative Placemaking Forum. Accessed September 28,
2012. http://openasheville.org/tag/parklet
Personal Reviews BIPEDIALITY. (2012). Parklets? Accessed October 9, 2012.
http://bipediality.wordpress.com/2012/09/29/parklets/