CHAPTER 4

COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL AND DESIGN RESULTS

4.1. General
In this study, the superstructure of six-story reinforced concrete building is
carried out by using ETABS (Extended Three dimensional Analysis of Building
System) software. Static lateral force procedure is used for static analysis. In this
study, comparisons of analysis and design results due to blast loading effect and
before applying blast loads are considered. From analysis results, story drift, story
shear and story moment for all stories are compared. Axial force, shear force and
bending moment of selected columns and shear force and bending moment of selected
beams are compared. From design results, increasing member size and rebar
percentage are described.

4.2. Comparison of Story Drift, Story Shear, and Story Moment

The comparative results of story drift, story shear, and story moment are
described from Figure4.1 to Figure 4.5. Results of story drift, story shear and story
moment for both directions are taken from due to blast loads and before applying blast
load. The values of story moments due blast load are much greater than that before
applying blast loads for all stories in X- direction. The values of story moments in Y
directions due to blast loads is greater than from story 1 to story 2. But comparison of
values in story 3 to story 6 is not distinctly different.
Story shear values for all stories in X-direction due to blast loads are not
applying. For all stories, story 1 has the greatest values of shear force and story 6 has
the least values of shear force in Y directions.
For story drifts in X-direction, story drift values due to blast loads are less than
before applying blast loads in all stories. In Y-direction, story drift values due to blast
loads in all stories are greater than that values before applying blast loads.
 55

Drift X
0
0
0
0

Story drift 0
0
0
0
0
GL STORY1 STORY2 STORY3 STORY4 STORY5 ROOF

Story Level

No blast condition( Combo 16 ) blast condition ( Combo 27 )

Figure 4.1.Comparison of Story Drift in X-direction due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads

Drift Y
0.01

0.01

0.01
Story drift

0
GL STORY1 STORY2 STORY3 STORY4 STORY5 ROOF

Story level

No Blast Condition ( Combo 18 ) Blast condition ( Combo 27 )

Figure 4.2.Comparison of Story Drift in Y-direction due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In comparison of story drift, the maximum values of story drift in X direction
are taken from combo 16 (0.9 DL – 1.02EQX) and that values in Y direction are taken
from combo 18 (0.9DL – 1.02EQY) for no blast condition. For blasting condition,
combo 27 (1.2DL+0.5LL+BLAST LOAD) are used. According to comparison, in X
direction that values due to blast load is about 80% lesser than combo 16 because
blast loads are applied to Y direction and also in Y direction 51 % of that values due
to blast loads are greater than combo 18 in all stories. So, theses structure is failed due
to blast loads.
 56

Story shear in Y direction

25000
21810.92 21810.92

20000

14812.52
15000
Story Shear

10178.1
10000
6578.03
5000 3988.84
1702.8
150.07 148.57 137.75 121.57 100.32 74.22 43.07
0
GL STORY1 STORY2 STORY3 STORY4 STORY5 ROOF

Story Level

No blast condition ( Combo 18 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.3.Comparison of Story Shear in Y-direction due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In comparison of story shear in X directions, this values due to blast loads is
not found because blast loads are applied in Y direction. According to comparison
chart, story shear values in Y direction due to blast loads is 99% greater than no blast
condition in all stories.

Story moment in X direction

16000000
14000000
12000000
10000000
Story moment

8000000
6000000
4000000
2000000
0
GL STORY1 STORY2 STORY3 STORY4 STORY5 ROOF

Story Level

No blast condition ( Combo 2 ) Blast condition ( Combo 27 )

Figure 4.4.Comparison of Story Moment in X-direction due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
 57

Story moment in Y direction

3000000

2500000

Story moment 2000000

1500000

1000000

500000

0
GL STORY1 STORY2 STORY3 STORY4 STORY5 ROOF

Story Level

No blast condition ( Combo 2 ) Blast condition ( Combo 27 )

Figure 4.5.Comparison of Story Moment in Y-direction due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In comparison of story moment in both directions, for no blast condition the
maximum values are found in combo 2 (1.4DL+1.7LL) and for blast condition combo
27 (1.2DL+0.5LL+BLAST LOAD) is used. According to comparison results in X
direction, 71% of blast condition exceed than that values before applying blast loads.
But in Y direction, 13% of blast loading condition exceed than combo 2 from story 1
to 3 and from story 4 to 6, 8% of combo 2 is greater than blast loading condition.

4.3. Comparison of Member Forces in Selected Columns

The member forces such as axial force, shear force and bending moment of the
seven selected columns are compared. The selected columns are expressed with each
elevation. Among columns, the column (C2, C5, C11, C14, C28, C18, C22), this
selected column have the greatest value of axial force, shear force and bending
moment according to each elevation line. Results of axial force, shear force and
bending moment of the three selected columns are taken from blast loading condition
and no blast condition. These conditions are the largest in load combinations. Plan of
the seven selected columns of the proposed building can be seen in Figure 4.6. The
comparisons of member forces such as maximum axial force, maximum shear force
 58

and maximum bending moment for the seven selected columns are shown in Figure
4.7 to 4.25.

Figure 4.6. Plan of Selected Columns of the Proposed Building

Axial force
1600

1400
1200
Axial force ( kips )

1000
800

600

400

200

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( Combo 26 ) Blast condition ( Combo 27 )

Figure 4.7.Comparison of Axial Force for C2 due to Blast Loads and before Applying
Blast Loads
 59

In Figure 4.7, from comparison of axial forces, the axial force of C2 due to
blast load is much greater than from story 1 to 5 and for no blast condition, combo 26
(0.79DL-1.02EQY) is taken.

Shear force
70

60

50
Shear force (kips)

40

30

20

10

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.8.Comparison of Shear Force for C2 due to Blast Loads and before Applying
Blast Loads
In Figure 4.8, from comparison of shear forces for C2, the values of shear
force in these two condition are much different from story 1 to story 3. From story 4
to story 6, the values are much not different.

Bending moment
10000
9000
8000
Bending moment ( kips-in )

7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.9. Comparison of Bending Moment for C2 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
 60

In Figure 4.9, for comparison of bending moment for C2, the values of
bending moment are much different between these conditions. But, from story 4 to
story 6 no these values are not much different.

Axial force
450
400
350
300
Axial force ( kips )

250
200
150
100
50
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.10.Comparison of Axial Force for C5 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.10, from comparison of axial forces, the axial force of C5 due to
blast load in story 1 is maximum than other stories.

Shear force
35

30

25
Shear force (kips)

20

15

10

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.11.Comparison of Shear Force for C5 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
 61

In Figure 4.11, from comparison of shear forces for C5, the values of C5 due
to blast loads are much than no blast condition .This chart illustrates significantly the
different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading condition
is the largest value of shear force.

Bending moment
6000

5000
Bending moment ( kips-in )

4000

3000

2000

1000

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.12. Comparison of Bending Moment for C5 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.12, for comparison of bending moment for C5, the values of C5
due to blast loads are much than no blast condition .This chart illustrates significantly
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.
 62

Axial force
300

250

200
Axial force
150

100

50

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Fig
ure 4.13.Comparison of Axial Force for C11 due to Blast Loads and before Applying
Blast Loads
In Figure 4.13, from comparison of axial forces for C11, the axial force of C11
due to blast load are much greater than combo 26 from story 1 to 4 and the maximum
value is found in story 1.

Shear force
14

12

10
Shear force (kips)

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Fi
gure 4.14. Comparison of Shear Force for C11 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.14, from comparison of shear forces for C11, the values of C11
due to blast loads are much than no blast condition .This chart illustrates significantly
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading
condition is the largest value of shear force.
 63

Bending moment
1600
1400

Bending moment ( kips-in)

1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Storyy level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.15. Comparison of Bending Moment for C11 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.15, for comparison of bending moment for C11, the values of C11
due to blast loads are much than no blast condition .This chart illustrates significantly
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.

Axial force
800
700
600
500
Axial force (kips)

400
300
200
100
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.16.Comparison of Axial Force for C14 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.16, from comparison of axial forces for C14, the axial force of C14
decreases gradually from story 1 to story 6.
 64

Shear force
2.5

Shear force ( kips )

1.5

0.5

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.17.Comparison of Shear Force for C14 due to Blast loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.17, from comparison of shear forces for C14, the values of C14
due to blast loads are not much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions. In story 3 to 5, the value of no blast
loading condition is larger than blast loading condition.

Bending moment
400
350
300
Bending moment (kips-in)

250
200
150
100
50
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.18.Comparison of Bending Moment for C14 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.18, from comparison of bending moment for C14, the values of
C14 due to blast loads are not much different than no blast condition .This chart
 65

illustrates the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of no blast
loading condition is the largest value of bending moment.

Axial force
1800
1600
1400
1200
Axial force (kips)

1000
800
600
400
200
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.19.Comparison of Axial Force for C28 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.19, from comparison of axial forces for C28, the axial force of C28
decreases gradually from story 1 to story 6.

Shear force
350

300

250
Shear force ( kips )

200

150

100

50

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.20.Comparison of Shear Force for C28 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.20, from comparison of shear forces for C28, the values of C28
due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition . This chart illustrates the
 66

different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading condition
is the largest value of shear force.

Bending moment
12000

10000
Bending moment ( kips-in )

8000

6000

4000

2000

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.21.Comparison of Bending Moment for C28 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.21, from comparison of bending moment for C28, the values of
C28 due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.

Axial force
500
450
400
350
Axial force ( kips )

300
250
200
150
100
50
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

 67

Figure 4.22.Comparison of Axial Force for C18 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.22, from comparison of axial forces for C18, the axial force of C18
decreases gradually from story 2 to story 6.

Shear force
20
18
16
14
Shear force ( kips )

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.23.Comparison of Shear Force for C18 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.23, from comparison of shear forces for C18, the values of C18
due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .But, in story 1 and story
2, these values are much different. This chart illustrates the different between these
two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading condition is the largest value of
shear force.

Bending moment
2500

2000
Bending moment ( kips-in )

1500

1000

500

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

 68

Figure 4.24.Comparison of Bending Moment for C18 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.24, from comparison of bending moment for C18, the values of
C18 due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions.

Axial force
2500

2000

1500
Axial force

1000

500

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.25.Comparison of Axial Force for C22 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.25, from comparison of axial forces for C22, the axial force of C22
decreases gradually from story 1 to story 6.

Shear force
35

30

25
Shear force ( kips )

20

15

10

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.26.Comparison of Shear Force for C22 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
 69

In Figure 4.26, from comparison of shear forces for C22, the values of C22
due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .But, in story 1, this value
are much different. This chart illustrates the different between these two conditions. In
story 1, the value of blast loading condition is the largest value of shear force.

Bending moment
4500
4000
3500
Bending moment ( kips-in )

3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.27.Comparison of Bending Moment for C22 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.27, from comparison of bending moment for C22, the values of
C22 due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of no blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.
4.4 Comparisons of Member Forces in Selected Beams
The member forces such as shear force and bending moment of the five
selected beams are compared. The selected beams are expressed with each elevation.
Among beams, the beams (B39, B23, B34, B32, B51), these selected beams have the
greatest value of shear force and bending moment according to each elevation.
Results of shear force and bending moment of the five selected beams are taken from
blast loading condition and no blast condition. These conditions are the largest in load
combinations. Plan of the five selected beams of the proposed building can be seen in
Figure 4.28. The comparisons of member forces such as maximum shear force and
maximum bending moment for the five selected beams are shown in Figure 4.29 to
4.38.
 70

Figure 4.28. Plan of Selected Beams of the Proposed Building

Shear force
600

500
Shear force ( kips )

400

300

200

100

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

 71

Figure 4.29.Comparison of Shear Force for B39 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.29, from comparison of shear forces for B39, the values of B39
due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .But, in story 1, this value
are much more different. This chart illustrates the different between these two
conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading condition is the largest value of shear
force.

Bending moment
45000
40000
35000
Bending moment ( kips-in)

30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.30.Comparison of Bending Moment for B39 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.30, from comparison of bending moment for B39, the values of
B39 due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of no blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.
 72

Shear force
700

600

500
Shear force (kips)
400

300

200

100

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.31.Comparison of Shear Force for B23 due to Blast loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.31, from comparison of shear forces for B23, the values of B23
due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .But, in story 1, this value
are much more different. This chart illustrates the different between these two
conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading condition is the largest value of shear
force.

Bending moment
60000

50000
Bending moment ( kips-in )

40000

30000

20000

10000

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.32.Comparison of Bending Moment for B23 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
 73

In Figure 4.32, from comparison of bending moment for B23, the values of
B23 due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.

Shear force
800
700
600
Shear force (kips)

500
400
300
200
100
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.33.Comparison of Shear Force for B34 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.33, from comparison of shear forces for B34, the values of B34
due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .But, in story 1, this value
are much more different. This chart illustrates the different between these two
conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading condition is the largest value of shear
force.

Bending moment
70000

60000
Bending moment (kips-in)

50000

40000

30000

20000

10000

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

 74

Figure 4.34.Comparison of Bending Moment for B34 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.34, from comparison of bending moment for B34, the values of
B34 due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.

Shear force
700

600

500
Shear force ( kips )

400

300

200

100

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.35.Comparison of Shear Force for B32 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.35, from comparison of shear forces for B32, the values of B32
due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .But, in story 1, this value
are much more different. This chart illustrates the different between these two
conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading condition is the largest value of shear
force.
 75

Bending moment
45000
40000
35000

Bending moment (kips-in)

30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.36.Comparison of Bending Moment for B32 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.36, from comparison of bending moment for B32, the values of
B32 due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of no blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.

Shear force
800
700
600
Shear force ( kips )

500
400
300
200
100
0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.37.Comparison of Shear Force for B51 due to Blast Loads and before
Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.37, from comparison of shear forces for B51, the values of B51
due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .But, in story 1, this value
are much more different. This chart illustrates the different between these two
 76

conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading condition is the largest value of shear
force.

Bending moment
70000

Bending moment ( kips-in ) 60000

50000

40000

30000

20000

10000

0
GL 1F 2F 3F 4F 5F Roof

Story level

No blast condition ( combo 26 ) Blast condition ( combo 27 )

Figure 4.38.Comparison of Bending Moment for B51 due to Blast Loads and
before Applying Blast Loads
In Figure 4.38, from comparison of bending moment for B51, the values of
B51 due to blast loads are much different than no blast condition .This chart illustrates
the different between these two conditions. In story 1, the value of blast loading
condition is the largest value of bending moment.

4.5. Comparison of Column Size and Rebar Percentage

After applying blast loads, all members of the structure are almost failed. Blast
loading condition controls these building. So these failed members are redesigned to
stable the structure. After redesigning, member size and rebar percentage are much
more than no blast loading condition. Maximum size of column is 48x48 and
minimum size is 24x24. Maximum rebar percentage is 7.4%. According to ACI 318-
99, the ratio of column steel area to gross sectional area is 0.01 to 0.08. So, these
column steel ratio are within limits.

Table 4.1. Increasing Column Size and Rebar Percentage

Column
Story
Leve Column Labels No blast Blast loading
l condition condition
 77

Rebar Rebar
Size perce Size perce
ntage ntage

C1,C2,C3,C4,C6,C7,C8,C15,C26,C16,C28,C19
14x14 1.00% 36x42 7.40%
,C21,C22,C23,C24
1st C5,C9,C10,C11,C12,C14,C18, 14x14 1.00% 36x48 6.58%

C9,C27,C17, 14x14 1.00% 48x48 6.88%

C5,C6,C7,C8,C9,C10,C11,C12,C18,C19 14x14 1.00% 36x42 5.30%

2nd C1,C2,C3,C4,C14,C15,C16,C26,C28,C21,C22,
14x14 1.00% 36x36 5.76%
C23,C24

C17,C20,C27 14x14 1.19% 36x48 4.10%

C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C9,C10,C11,C12,C14,C15
14x14 1.00% 30x36 5.52%
,C16,C26,C28,C21,C22,C23,C24

C18,C19,C27 14x14 1.00% 36x36 3.55%

3rd
C17,C20 14x14 1.00% 36x42 2.89%

C7,C8 14x14 1.00% 24x36 4.94%

Table 4.1. (Continued-)

C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C10,C11,C12,C14,C15,C1
12x12 1.00% 24x36 4.39%
6,C26,C21,C22,C23,C24,C28

C7,C8 12x12 1.00% 24x30 4.43%

4th
C9,C27,C18,C19 12x12 1.00% 30x36 3.88%

C17,C20 12x12 1.00% 36x36 2.49%

C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C10,C11,C12,C14,C15,C1
12x12 1.00% 24x30 3.06%
6,C26,C21,C22,C23,C24,C28

C7,C8 12x12 1.00% 24x24 2.60%

5th
C17,C20 12x12 1.00% 30x36 1.69%

C9,C27,C18,C19 12x12 1.00% 24x36 2.39%

C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C10,C11,C12,C14,C15,C1
12x12 1.00% 24x24 3.36%
6,C26,C21,C22,C23,C24,C28,C7,C8
6th C9,C27,C18,C19 12x12 1.05% 24x30 1.00%

C17,C20 12x12 1.56% 24x36 1.00%

 78

4.6. Comparison of Beam Size

After applying blast loads, beams of the structure are almost failed. So these
beams are redesigned to stable the structure. This table shows the cross sectional area
of increasing beam size.
Table 4.2. Increasing beam size
Beam size
Story Beam Label Blast loading
No blast condition
condition
B50,B56,B59,B60 10x12 12x14

B1,B2,B3,B7,B8,B9,B10,B12,B102,B103 10x14 14x20

B4,B5,B6,B17,B18,B19 10x14 14x36

Story 1
B25,B26,B27,B97,B98,B35,B36,B37,B70 10x12 24x36

B23,B24,B100,B39,B64,B65,B66,B30,B71,B51 10x12 30x40

B101,B20 10x12 36x40

Table 4.2. (Continued-)

B56,B59,B49,B60,B50,B7,B8,B9,B10,B11,B12 10x12 12x14

B1,B2,B3,B17,B18,B19,B13,B14,B102,B103,B4,
Story 2 10x14 14x20
B5,B6
B20,B23,B24,B100,B101,B33,B34,B38,B39,B53,
B31,B32,B35,B36,B37,B25,B26,B27,B97,B98,B5 10x12 24x36
1
B56,B59,B49,B60,B105,B106,B7,B8,B9,B10,B11,
10x14 12x14
B12,

B4,B5,B6,B102,B103,B1,B2,B3,B17,B18,B19 10x14 14x20

Story 3
B33,B34,B53,B72,B73,B74,B51 10x12 20x30

B58,B61,B62,B110,B111,B38,B39,B32,B35,B36,
10x12 24x36
B37,B71,
B1,B2,B3,B7,B8,B9,B10,B11,B12,B13,B14,B102,
10x14 12x14
B103,B49,B50,B56,B59,B60

Story 4 B4,B5,B6,B17,B18,B19 10x14 12x18

B67,B68,B69,B72,B73,B74,B51 10x12 14x30

 79

B58,B61,B62,B111,B110,B30,B33,B34,B38,B39,
10x12 14x36
B71
B1,B2,B3,B49,B59,B13,B14,B102,B103,B56,B4,
B5,B6,B7,B8,B9,B10,B11,B12,B50,B60,B105,B1 10x14 12x14
06
B17,B18,B19 10x14 12x18
Story 5
B72,B73,B74,B51,B108,B109 10x12 14x20

B58,B61,B62,B110,B111,B30,B33,B34,B38,B39,
10x12 14x30
B31,B32,B35,B36,B37
B1,B2,B3,B4,B5,B6,B7,B8,B9,B10,B11,B12,B13,
10x14 12x14
B14,B17,B18,B19,B102,B103,B105,B106
Story 6 B30,B31,B32,B33,B34,B35,B36,B37,B38,B39,B5
8,B61,B62,B111,B110,B58,B108,B109,B72,B73, 10x12 14x20
B74

4.7. Summary
In this chapter, comparisons of analytical results and design result have been
described. Story drift, story shear, story moment and member forces of selected
columns and selected beams are compared due to blast loads. And comparison of
column size and rebar percentage between these two conditions. Then, increasing area
of beam size between these two conditions are described.