Cognitive Implications in 3D of Triadic Symbols Valued in 2D
Cognitive Implications in 3D of Triadic Symbols Valued in 2D
Cognitive Implications in 3D of Triadic Symbols Valued in 2D
Introduction
Eliciting significance from symbol dynamics in 2D and 3D
Adapting 2D images to 3D: transformations of cognitive significance
Forms of the triskelion in 3D of potential significance
Quantum consciousness implications of fundamental symbol patterns
On being "walking wave functions" in terms of quantum consciousness?
Paradoxes of communicating fundamental insight through metaphor
References
The argument here has been further developed separately (Psychosocial Learnings from the Spiral Form of Hurricanes: implications of
the triple helix and the 3-fold triskelion as "cognitive cyclones"? 2017), to which the following is therefore an introduction.
Introduction
A number of traditional symbols considered fundamental in various cultures have typically been rendered in two dimensions. They are to
be found in architecture, flags, and a variety of insignia, and are much valued in terms of their significance. They can be understood as
providing a collective cognitive focus, a source of inspiration, and may well be a catalyst for meditation. The question here is the further
signifiance to which they may give rise when rendered in three dimensions rather than two. Exploration of the possibility is enabled by
development in computer software, especially in anticipation of the widespread deployment of virtual reality devices.
The example explored here is the triskelion (triskele) or triple spiral, notably when based on interlocking Archimedean spirals. The
symbol, also known as the "spiral of life", appears in many early cultures dating back to the Neolithic period, most notably that of the
famed megalithic tomb of Newgrange in Ireland, built around 3200 BC. It has been the focus of many interpretations, perhaps most
usefully that of Glenys Livingstone (Celebrating the Triple Spiral: a PaGaian Cosmology, PaGaian Cosmology, 2007). Traditional Asian
versions of the triskelion include the Japanese Mitsudomoe, the Tibetan Buddhist Gankyil, and the Korean Sam Taegeuk (Triple Tomoe
and Related Threefold Symbols, Pennine Tai Chi). Variants appear in church architecture and jewelry.
As a logo, modern usage includes that of Trisquel (officially Trisquel GNU/Linux), a Linux distribution, derived from another computer
operating system, Ubuntu. It is the logo of Mankind 2000. As with the swastika, the triskelion may well be used by white supremacist
groups, especially in countries where the swastika is banned. The triskelion form is specifically associated with the protein clathrin which
performs critical roles in shaping rounded vesicles in the cytoplasm for intracellular trafficking. As names, both "triskelion" and "triskele"
are associatrd with commercial products and services (if not trademarked).
Such a symbol is of particular interest given the cognitive importance attached to a number of triadic patterns. These include the semiotic
triangle of meaning of Charles Ogden, the triangulated Oedipus complex of Jacques Lacan, the phenomenological epoché of Francisco
Varela, and the Christian Trinity. Of particular interest is the triadic form of the logo of the Roerich Pact, namely the inter-American
Treaty on the Protection of Artistic and Scientific Institutions and Historic Monuments (1935). This provides legal recognition that the
defense of cultural objects is more important than the use or destruction of that culture for military purposes, and that the protection of
culture always has precedence over any military necessity.
Especially appropriate to the argument here is that the 3-fold set of Borromean rings has been rendered in 3D and adopted as the logo of
the International Mathematical Union in 2006. The set of rings is a famous topological link of three components. The rings have the
surprising property that if any one component is removed, the other two can fall apart (while all three together remain linked). This so-
called Brunnian property has led the rings to be used over many centuries in many cultures as a symbol of interconnectedness, or of
strength in unity. It has been used in a medieval depiction of the Christian Trinity, for example.
Composed as it is of three interweaving Archimedean spirals, the triskelion could well be described as a triple helix. Although it is not
used as the logo of the Triple Helix Association, it is appropriate to note the pattern of international conferences of that body since 1996.
These seek to promote all aspects of the interaction between academy-industry-government in fostering research, innovation, economic
competitiveness and growth.
The question is whether and how richer insight might be enabled by rendering two-dimensional patterns of significance into 3D, notably
through recognition of the dynamics associated with any such topological transformation. To the extent that a two-dimensional pattern
may be cognitively embodied in some way as a focus of identity, the "extrusion" of the pattern to engender a form in 3D is particularly
intriguing. There is then the implication that the 2D pattern is an especially restricted projection of a richer and deeper sense of identity --
a limitation inappropriate to the times, and perhaps dangerously so.
There is the possibility that forms of connectivity that prove difficult in 2D, if not impossible, may be rendered comprehensible by
renderings in 3D. This could be relevant to eliciting imaginative new thinking -- transcending the many binary framings by which
intractable conflicts are currently sustained. What subtler insights can such 3D renderings "carry", engender and distinguish -- notably as
a means of counteracting tendencies to their dysfunctional conflation in practice?
The transformation of perspective from 2D to 3D can itself help to frame consideration of the individual and collective implications of
"quantum reality". Their credibility has been remarkably argued by Alexander Wendt (Quantum Mind and Social Science: unifying
physical and social ontology, 2015). The possibility is all the more relevant because that argument is made from the perspective of one of
the most prominenent scholars of international relations with a special focus on international security. He notably calls into question the
conventional understanding of the division of the global system into "states", suggesting the need for a quantum model of human identity
The argument has been variously developed with respect to other symbols considered to be of fundamental significance in some way:
enneagram: This was explored in terms of the recognition by Stafford Beer, with respect to management cybernetics, of the
embedding of the (seemingly 2D) enneagram within the 3D icosahedron, which he describes as emerging from collaboration with
Joseph Truss -- in a chapter on The Dynamics of Icosahedral Space (Beyond Dispute, 1994, pp. 196-209), as discussed
separately (Imagining the nature of cognitive "flight" in terms of the enneagram, 2014)
lauburu: Various animations have been produced as separately indicated (24-fold Pattern Implied by Dynamics of the Lauburu in
3D, 2016). The relevance of the lauburu was noted with respect to experimental animation of the Smith Chart in Modulating
cognitive transformations: electrical metaphors and semiconduction (2012) and Wave-language potentially implied in encodings
elaborated by cultures (2013). These animations related to further commentary (Improvisation in Multivocal Poetic Discourse:
Basque lauburu and bertsolaritza as catalysts of global significance, 2016)
swastika: Animations of the counter-rotation of the two forms of the swastika were presented with that of the triskelion (Central
pattern generators and higher order values? 2017), noting the cognitive significance of the implied dynamic (Swastika as Dynamic
Pattern Underlying Psychosocial Power Processes: implicate order of Knight's move game-playing sustaining creativity,
exploitation and impunity, 2012). The dynamics can be discussed in relation to that of other patterns (Cross, swastika variants
and lauburu, 2008) as a feature of the Sustainability through Magically Dancing Patterns (2008)
Star of David: The relation of this symbol to the 3D form of the Merkabah is separately described (Framing Global
Transformation through the Polyhedral Merkabah: neglected implicit cognitive cycles in viable complex systems, 2017). This
notably explored the 2D Star of David as reinforcing dangerous cognitive reductionism and the Richer pattern of significance
through complexification of the Star of David. The animations of mappings onto the Star of David was also presented. Of
particular interest at this time is the symbolic reconciliation with the 5-fold Islamic Star (Middle East Peace Potential through
Dynamics in Spherical Geometry: engendering connectivity from incommensurable 5-fold and 6-fold conceptual frameworks,
2012).
pentagram: A key contribution to understanding of navigation around the globe -- between 2D and 3D perspectives -- has been the
mathematical formulation Napier's rules for right spherical triangles. These were associated with a simple 5-fold structure later
termed the Pentagramma Mirificum. Arguably such thinking has implications for psycho-social understandings of globality, as
previously argued (Global Psychosocial Implication in the Pentagramma Mirificum: clues from spherical geometry to "getting
around" and circumnavigating imaginatively, 2015). There is then a strong case for exploring how the geometry of "stars" may
frame thinking in some poorly recognized way -- potentially to be informed by neglected insights concerning the mathematics of
globality. There is a curious parallel with respect to health and healing between the pentagonal Wu Xing pattern, as a fundamental
Chinese concept, and the Pythagorean symbol of the Hygiea (Beyond dispute in 5-dimensional space: Pentagramma Mirificum?
2015). That there is a degree of sensitivity to such pentagonal symbols is evident from the concern which can be aroused in the
media by their inversion and association with questionable rituals.
torus / helix: Although 3D forms in their own right, whether as individual symbols, or combined in relation to a spiral form, these
can be explored as potentially of relevance to the form of a mandala in 3D, given its particular cognitive significance
(Visualization in 3D of Dynamics of Toroidal Helical Coils: in quest of optimum designs for a Concordian Mandala, 2016;
Enabling Wisdom Dynamically within Intertwined Tori: requisite resonance in global knowledge architecture, 2012)
Mandelbrot set as visually rendered: As with the set of Borromean rings, although not widely recognized, 2D representations of
the Mandelbrot set are considered by mathematicians as offering especially valuable insight into the fractal organization of
complexity. Various renderings in 3D also exist. The possible psycho-social significance can be explored (Psycho-social
Significance of the Mandelbrot Set: a sustainable boundary between chaos and order, 2005; Understanding the Monster through
the Mandelbrot set -- Moonshine connectivity? 2007).
The possibly of unexplored implications of the use of such symbols at the present time is evident in the case of The Pentagon, or the
logo of NATO. These therefore lend themselves to exploration of how they might be understood through forms of higher dimensionality
(Envisaging NATO Otherwise -- in 3D and 4D? Potentially hidden faces of global strategy highlighted through polyhedra, 2017).
Whereas mapping, most notably of the globe, focuses on projection from 3D to 2D, the latter addresses the seemingly unexplored
challenge of inferring a 3D form from one in 2D (Explanation as interplay of projection and "conjection"? and Surrogates of
"conjection" as an unrecognized cognitive process?).
There is particular value in exploring triadic symbols such as the triskelion -- beyond that noted above -- namely the manner in which it is
implied by the relation between the three primary Abrahamic religions. Necessarily a matter of great controversy, it is their conflictual
relations which are so characteristic of current global dynamics, as may be variously discussed (Root Irresponsibility for Major World
Problems: the unexamined role of Abrahamic faiths in sustaining unrestrained population growth, 2007; Systemic Reliance of World
Religions on Human Sacrifice: covert use of fatal conflict to ensure vital resource management, 2014).
Curiously, beyond the motivation of any of the Abrahamic religions (despite efforts at interfaith dialogue), the triadic nature of their
relationship goes systematically unexplored, as can be otherwise reframed (Triangulation of Incommensurable Concepts for Global
Configuration, 2011). There is seemingly no symbol of that relationship as a whole, irrespective of the existence of distinctive geometric
symbols for each of them.
Another approach to the challenge of these divisive times is through identifying a pattern through which a variety of such conventional
symbols might be interrelated (Dynamic Exploration of Value Configurations: interrelating traditional cultural symbols through
animation, 2008; video).
Whilst such technicalities may seem irrelevant to the argument here (and trivial to those with skills in this arena), there is a case for
recognizing that they constitute useful metaphors of the obstacles to a shift in understanding required to transform a 2D form into one
which can be insightfully explored in 3D -- and especially within a virtual reality context. This argument is developed below with respect
to the implications for quantum consciousness.
Movement of spheres along triskelion pathway: The coloured spheres can be readily moved along the spiral pathways, as shown
below. It is notable that the form of the pathway does not result in the spheres colliding. The relative speed of movement of the spheres
can be modified, as well as their relative sizes; made smaller, they could move "within" the tubular pathway. Both could b varied along
the pathway, perhaps to the point of rendering a sphere invisibly small in portions of the pathway.
These images are potentially useful as a means of holding contrasting views of a triadic pattern, notably that on the left. This could
involve rotation around a horizontal axis indicating the emergence of an inverted form, and "reabsorption" of one contrasting form. The
rotation of perspectives which are potentially orthogonal to one another is indicated with respect to the vertical axis by the central and
right-hand images (and as animated). Again it can be stressed that the relative rate of rotations of the two forms can be readily modified.
Triple rotation around binary axes: Namely 3-fold over rotation around axes through centers (forthcoming)
Non-tubular solid: In quest of a "solid" form of the triskelion, one approach is to use the 2D pattern in a simple linear extrusion between
two points. The result is problematic, as indicated by the image on the left below, about which Sergey Bederov remarks that the cross-
section is highly non-convex, and such cross-sections may not be readily supported by some viewers (even with convex="false") -- as is
the case with H3DViewer. Using one option (solid="false") he was able to render visible at least some of the intended shape. All VRML
viewers display non-convex polygons correctly and some X3D viewers may do so without such obvious deficiencies.
Following further manipulation, as an alternative (to enable rendering with H3DViewer), Bederov made use of the IndexedFaceSet option,
with all faces explicitly triangulated to enable use of that viewer (as in the alternative image on the left). The deficiences of any viewer
suggest consideration of the possible cognitive deficiencies in the "view" of any higher order form, notably as potentially associated with
any particular cognitive model. The recourse to triangulation merits consideration of its more general implications, especially in relation to
any trinity (Triangulation of Incommensurable Concepts for Global Configuration, 2011; Holiness framed by a triangulated
configuration of holes, 2014).
3D-printable variants are variously marketed, notably in the form of a pendant (Triple Spiral - Triskele - Sacred Geometry - Celtic; Triple
Spiral)
Triangular extrusion of the triskelion pattern: (in preparation)
Circular extrusion of the triskelion pattern: A linear extrusion usefully raises the question as to the greater integrity implied by an
extrusion along a circular spine, if that is possible. Of particular relevance is then the diameter of the circle, with one such exercise
(giving of toroidal form) variously presented below. A smaller diameter would necessarily increase the degree of closure. Without using
the wireframe rendering no hint of the spiralling inner structure would be possible in the views shown, however that inner structure can
be explored using 3D viewers. It should be emphasized that the triskelion is the cross-section of the toroidal tube depicted below --
understood as extruded from the triskelion, or as a rotation of it around the centre of the torus.
Some impression of navigation within the 3D form above in virtual reality can be obtained from the following screen shots obtained using
the VRML variant, using the viewer Cortona3D. Presumably the views could be enhanced for greater clarity with other techniques.
Screen shots of inner structure of extrusion of the triskelion pattern along a circular path
(left image is a wireframe rendering of that in the centre; background changed for image on right)
As rendered in the images above, the circularly extruded 3D triskelion invites reflection in terms of the following:
Although not visible in the absence of 3D viewer capacity, the spiral coilings around the toroidal form (but contained within it) are
consistent with the earlier explorations noted above (Visualization in 3D of Dynamics of Toroidal Helical Coils: in quest of
optimum designs for a Concordian Mandala, 2016; Concordian Mandala as a Symbolic Nexus, 2016).
The spiral form is reminiscent of the marine nautilus valued as emblematic of desirable forms of growth and development. It is
notably used both as a symbol of educational development and of strategic appropriateness (New Zealand Curriculum Nautilus,
Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development). The question is how to benefit from this dynamic, as discussed
separately (Enabling Governance through the Dynamics of Nature: exemplified by cognitive implication of vortices and
helicoidal flow, 2010).
The form of the triskelion is also somewhat reminiscent of that of standard renderings of the fractal Mandelbrot set, whose
psycho-social implications can be explored (Sustainability through the Dynamics of Strategic Dilemmas -- in the light of the
coherence and visual form of the Mandelbrot set, 2005; Psycho-social Significance of the Mandelbrot Set: a sustainable
boundary between chaos and order, 2005). It is therefore appropriate to note explorations of 3D renderings of the set, known by
the term Mandelbulb.
As noted above, the triskelion is composed of three interweaving Archimedean spirals, and is of the same class as the hyperbolic spiral
and Fermat's spiral. All static spirals appearing in nature are however logarithmic spirals, not Archimedean, although many dynamic
spirals (such as the Parker spiral of the solar wind, or the pattern made by a Catherine's wheel) are Archimedean. Such distinctions
suggest reflection on contrasting modes of psycho-social development, as can be variously considered (From global to helicoidal --
from pi to phi?, 2010; "Seeing" as implied by the Fibonacci spiral, 2011; Spiralling around "nothingness" and "pointlessness": the
implication of phi, 2012).
As might be expected, being of interest to mathematicians, there are various accessible examples of Archimedean spirals, extruded to 3D,
presented dynamically and interactively.
From "biskelions" to triskelions? The collection of images of polyskelions (presented above), includes what might be termed a
"biskelion" or a "diskelion" -- namely two interweaving Archimedean spirals (image on left below). More correctly these are Fermat
spirals, namely a type of Archimedean spiral. This may be compared with a variety of mathematically distinct spirals, including: an Euler
spiral (spiros, clothoid or Cornu spiral) and a spiral tiling (as presented in the MathWorld entry on tiling, from the cover illustration of
Branko Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard, Tilings and Patterns, 1987). It can also be compared with the classic symbol of Taoism (image
on right).
This raises the question of the comparability of these patterns, if only in a cognitive sense (beyond fascination with a single spiral) -- and
of how this may extend to the triskelion with further implications for comprehension. They suggest various exercises relating the
Fibonacci spiral, the Clothoid and the Tao symbol (Designing Global Self-governance for the Future: patterns of dynamic integration of
the netherworld, 2010; Tao of Engagement -- Weaponised Interactions and Beyond: Fibonacci's magic carpet of games to be played for
sustainable global governance, 2010).
Of current relevance are the various anouncements of the detection of gravitational waves associated with interacting black holes,
notably by the CALTECH Laser Interferometer Graviational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), as discussed by Graham Templeton (What are
gravitational waves, and where does physics go from here now that we've found them? Extremetech, 12 February 2016), Whether
presented as photos, simulation screen shots, or imagined artwork, the dynamics bear a surprising resemblace to the twin spiral biselion
discussed above.
Spiral dance of black holes Colliding black holes Black hole merger
Source: LIGO/T Caltech. Detail of image of Black hole merger and
Pyle; also video of artist's Gravitational wave space-time reverberations
animation showing merger detection showing shape of visualized. (T. Dietrich, Max
of two black holes and ripples from black hole Planck Institute for
gravitational waves rippling collision Gravitational Physics / R.
outward during the event (The Guardian, 27 Haas, NCSA, 27 September
(another video). September 2017) 2017); and video
Source: alamy_JHP71R.jpg
Especially intriguing is both the reversal of direction of the spirals and the manner in which the centres of the spirals may be linked
through another dimension (as cognitive "wormholes"), potentially to be recognized only intuitively, as in the case of the triskelion. More
intriguing is the cosmic significance of the 2-spiral process and the possible cognitive functionality of a 3-spiral process -- understood as
the classic three-body problem of concern to physics and to quantum mechanics, and celebrated in popular science fiction by r Liu Cixin
(The Three-Body Problem, 2008).
Codification of relative
Vision-Light variant Sound-Silence variant
orders
0-dimension:
Red, Green or Blue
1-dimension:
Yellow (=Red/Green)
Purple (=Red/Blue); or
Turquoise (=Blue/Green)
2-dimension:
White (=Red/Green/Blue)
Triadic thinking? Various approaches to triadic thinking are cited (notably clustered as Triadic Thinking by Academia.edu):
Paris Arnopoulos: Triple Helix and Triadic Codex: braiding nature, culture and nurture (Paper for Third Triple Helix International
Conference, 2000)
Norman D. Cook:
Harmony, Perspective and Triadic Cognition (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Triadic Insights in Astronomy, Art and Music (2010)
Anna Burhouse:, Now We are Two, Going on Three: triadic thinking and its link with development in the context of young child
observations (International Journal of Infant Observation and Its Applications, 4, 2001, 2).
What is Triadic Thinking? as articluated by John G. Bennet (The Triad, 1956)
Martin Brown: The Triadic Trap. (18 May 2014) as author of Civilizing the Economy: a new economics of provision (University
of San Francisco, 2010)
Sigmund Ongstad: Bakhtin's Triadic Epistemology and Ideologies of Dialogism (Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language and
Culture, 2004, pp 65-88)
Michael Giesecke: Triadic Thinking and Post-Typographic Epistemology (In: Torsten Meyer, et al: Education Within a New
Medium. Knowledge Formation and Digital Infrastructure, 2008, pp. 290-297).
Giuseppe Naimo: Consciousness: a triadic process (Murdoch University, 2002)
There is extensive interest in the dyamics of the "triple bond" in molecular chemistry. That understanding has also been used to frame
aesthetic forms (Joseph G. Price (Ed.), The Triple Bond: plays, mainly Shakespearean in performance, Pennsylvania State University
Press, 1975; Wouter Davidts, Triple Bound: Essays on Art, Architecture and the Museum, Valiz/Antennae, 2017).
Triple helix: As noted above, given the manner in which it is constituted by three interweaving Archimedean spirals, the triskelion could
well be understood as a form of triple helix -- as projected into 2D. Double helix DNA 3D structures are the primary form among all life
forms on this planet; triple helix DNA has been reported occasionally and for transient periods -- and is explored as a molecular structure.
The geometry of the triple helix -- as a symbol -- is now closely associated with the triple helix approach.
As described by the Triple Helix Research Group of Stanford University, the Triple Helix thesis is that the potential for innovation and
economic development in a knowledge society lies in a more prominent role for the university and in the hybridisation of elements from
university, industry and government to generate new institutional and social formats for the production, transfer and application of
knowledge. (The Triple Helix Concept; publications).
It is in this sense that the triadic thinking underlying the activities promoted by the Triple Helix Association merit particular attention, as
instigated by Henry Etzkowitz (Triple Helix: a new model of innovation, 2005). This is suggested by a selection of its international
conference themes and papers since 1996:
Addressing ecosystem challengs in an era of crises (Heidelberg, 2016)
Academic-Industry-Government Triple Helix model for fast-developing countries (Beijing, 2015)
Triple Helix as nucleus of innovation and economic growth (Tomsk, 2014)
Triple Helix in a context of global change: continuing, mutating or unravelling? (London, 2013)
Emerging Triple Helix models for developing countries: from conceptualization to implementation (Bandung, 2012)
Triple Helix in the development of cities of knowledge, expanding communities and connecting regions (Madrid, 2010)
Role of Triple Helix in the global agenda of innovation, competitiveness and sustainability (Glasgow, 2009)
As an instititional member, the World Association of Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (WATEF) is a scholarly association that
promotes evidence-based methodologies to analyse complex social interactions to understand social and technological change.
Despite the manner in which a form of triadic thinking is clearly emphasized, it would seem to be the case that there is little emphasis on
the cognitive dimension in contrast with that on the implementation of forms of collaboration engendering innovation. The degree of
reification implied by the triple helix model contrasts with the fundamental challenge suggested by the DNA-related metaphor. This is
implied to a far greater degree by the triskelion as a symbol and the paradoxical cognitive dynamics with which it has been associated
over millennia. However the possibility of projecting it into 3D -- as a form of triple helix -- indeed merits further consideration.
Patterns as "cognitive aerials"? From the perspective of this argument, a fundamental question is why a range of simple patterns have
proven historically to be such cognitively powerful triggers -- as "powerful symbols". Why have so many cultures engaged with triadic
symbols in particular over such a long period -- with the triskelion dating back to Neolithic times?
Given a degree of recognition of the function of aerial arrays, and the importance of their appropriate configuration, it could be suggested
that such triadic patterns serve as a means of orienting awareness to greater subtlety. Do such patterns offer a means of "capturing" and
recognizing "cognitive waves" otherwise only susceptible to intuitive recognition -- much as is appreciated in some Native American
cultures in the form and function of so-called dream catchers. Might the triskelion be fruitfully understood in the light of a tripole
antenna?
With respect to indication of 3D spirals, of interest is the depiction of the radiation pattern of an Archimedean spiral antenna (Isa
Kocakarin and Korkut Yegin, (Glass Superstrate Nanoantennas for Infrared Energy Harvesting Applications, International Journal of
Antennas and Propagation, 2013). Curiously the term "cognitive antenna" is used with respect to "cognitive radio" to describe the
sequential switching of elements of an "intelligent antenna" array based on spectrum sensing.
Intuitive recognition of quark structure and dynamics? Given the very fundamental nature of a quark as an imagined ordering of
matter, it could be inferred that humans have some degree of intuitive understanding of the pattern by which they are constituted. The
quark is a feature of the Standard Model of Elementary Particles.
In the language of particle physicists and quantum mechanics, a proton is composed of two up quarks, one down quark, and the gluons
that mediate the forces "binding" them together. The color assignment of individual quarks is arbitrary, but all three colors must be
present. It is this triadic pattern which can be understood as indicative of triadic relationships in general, and especially those imagined
with respect to the psycho-social system.
The image on the left is indicative of the complexity of that triadic structure as described by Wikipedia. That on the right is suggestive of
the manner in which the triadic pattern functions as an "aerial" embedded in electromagnetic waves -- with the triskelion then suggestive
of an orderly combination of both insights.
In contrast, social structures are mind-dependent, and so no as yet un-invented technology will enable ETs to see them. Indeed,
even if ETs could scan our brains they would not see them, since social structures are not "in" our brains either, but in our
minds. This is not to say that, through careful study of our behavior and perhaps extrapolation from their own experience, ETs
could not infer the presence of states. But that would mean coming to see them as we do, by learning to read our minds. Short
of that, the ETs would have to report back home that while Earth was teeming with life, perhaps even intelligent life, nowhere
were there any states. (pp. 24-25)
Curiously the challenging nature of "existence" is even more strikingly made with respect to the "international community" to which so
many appeals are made and which is considered a key to global governance (International Community as God or Sorcerer's Apprentice?
Strategic chaos in the absence of an interlocking temporal pattern of longer-term cyclic processes, 2015).
Quantum consciousness: Fortunately or unfortunately, speculation with regard to "quantum consciousness" has become fashionable in
many domains -- seemingly to little effect with respect to understanding of global crises. Wendt offers a quantum model of man in
sections on quantum cognition and rational choice, agency and quantum will, and non-local experience in time. The points made are
remarkably argued.
Of relevance to the discussion above with respect to "extrusion" of 3D forms from a 2D pattern is how a pattern fundamental to the
sense of human identity might be understood otherwise. A triadic pattern such as the triskelion could be recognized as a 2D template or
"cut out" -- consonant in the case of the Christian trinity with "the image of God", however it may function as a "cognitive aerial" (as
argued above).
As with the nation state, to what extent does individual human identity exist over time as "extruded" through that pattern? How does it
exist in 3D -- or as a form of higher dimensionality -- other than as creatively imagined, perhaps mistakenly? The question relates to
Buddhist insights into the "emptiness of form".
Wendt argues that that:
The idea that people are just very complicated machines has a long pedigree, and became dominant in cognitive science and
beyond with the advent of the computational theory of mind in the mid-twentieth century. In this picture we are walking
computers, constantly crunching data from the environment to realize pre-programmed objectives. (p. 153)
He imagines a contrasting perspective, variously stressing that humans are effectively walking wave functions:
In this book I explore the possibility that this foundational assumption of social science is a mistake, by re-reading social science
"through the quantum". More specifically, I argue that human beings and therefore social life exhibit quantum coherence -- in
effect, that we are walking wave functions. (p. 16)
Wendt develops this argument from various perspectives in response to existing schools of thought:
Quantum consciousness theory suggests that human beings are literally walking wave functions. Most quantum decision
theorists would not go that far, and indeed -- perhaps wary of controversy -- they generally barely mention quantum
consciousness, and then only to emphasize that they are making no claims about what is going on deep inside the brain (much
less about consciousness), but are only interested in behavior. (p. 164)
With respect to how humans exist over time, beyond any patterned slice in the moment, Wendt argues:
If we are walking wave functions, then even though our experiences at each moment are actualities, at the quantum level of the
unconscious, "there are many histories that are there as potentialities". (p. 211)
The study by Wendt provides a valuable summary of the views of a variety of schools of thought, suggesting that:
While there are a priori reasons to doubt it, there is growing experimental evidence that human behavior in fact follows quantum
principles. If that evidence continues to mount, it would confirm a key prediction of quantum consciousness theory, according
to which our subjectivity is a macroscopic quantum mechanical phenomenon -- that we are walking wave functions. That would
constitute a basis for solving the mind-body problem, and in so doing unifying physical and social ontology within a naturalistic,
though no longer materialist, worldview. (p. 292)
Wendt concludes:
In arguing that human beings really are walking wave functions, therefore, my goal has been only to try to foresee what such a
confrontation might look like. (p. 290)
You might not share my aesthetic sense and thus be reluctant to believe we really are walking wave functions. That's of course
fine. But by arguing it could be true I hope I have given you reason to suspend your belief that we really are just classical
machines, and thus to suspend your disbelief in quantum consciousness long enough to try assuming it in your work. If you do,
perhaps you will find your own home in the universe too. (p. 302)
I intend the argument not as an analogy or metaphor, but as a realist claim about what people really are. Scholars have long
pointed to a number of strong analogies between human and quantum processes: between free will and wave function collapse,
the holism of meaning and non-locality, observer effects in psychological experiments and quantum measurement, and even
double-entry accounting and quantum information. These and other analogies are sufficiently suggestive that one might apply
quantum thinking to social life simply on that basis. While one could read this book entirely in that way, as an interesting analogy,
my personal belief is that human beings really are quantum systems. (p. 16)
Given the manner in which he explicitly and frutifully questions the existence of nation states, and proposes a new understanding of
human identity, it is appropriate to ask what degree of "existence" should be attributed to the quantum model he articulates. Paradoxically,
for example, one reality of that articulation is that it exists as intellectually property -- in this case copyrighted by the author rather than
by the publisher (as is so often the case).
Although Wendt has no need to address this particular paradox or the question of the existence of those who engender and appreciate
models -- notably physicists -- he calls into question the reality of analogies and metaphors, whilst asserting his personal belief in his own
perspective. To what extent can a physicist be understood to exist in the light of a quantum perspective? Provocatively it might be
suggested that Wendt is as much as "writing wave function" as a walking one -- with the obligation of quantum physicists to recognize
that they are "experimental wave functions".
Relevant to that question is the role of analogy and metaphor as explored by Douglas Hofstadter and Emmanuel Sander (Surfaces and
Essences: analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking, 2013), as a further development of Hofstadter's earlier work (Fluid Concepts and
Creative Analogies: computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought, 1995) and an extension of his seminal work on music
and self-reference (Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, 1979). The importance of metaphor is specifically highlighted with
respect to the creativity of Albert Einstein.
Whilst such creative thinking is much to be appreciated, in historical terms any such model may only herald a potential paradigm shift of
great significance -- but one which history will recognize as susceptible to replacement by even more radical insights. There is a sense in
which such models are temporary surrogates for intuited insights embodied in symbolic forms such as the triskelion, whose significance
is somehow sustained over millennia in contrast to those of any model.
Sustainability: In contrast to the enduring use of such centro-symmetric symbols, it is intriguing to note global efforts to frame
sustainability through a simple asystemic checklist of Sustainable Development Goals. These can however be experimentally reordered
as a 4x4 matrix of goals, evoking the integrity associated with so-called magic squares (Refining the Value of Sustainable Development
Goals: in quest of the systemic coherence of global attractors, 2017; Interplay of Sustainable Development Goals through Rubik Cube
Variations: engaging otherwise with what people find meaningful, 2017).
Use of a 4x4 matrix for sustainability, whether magical or not, bears a curious resemblance to the many representations of the Standard
Model of Elementary Particles as basically a 4x4 matrix. It is therefore appropriate to note the exercise by Thomas DeMichele to
reconfigure that pattern of quantum entities into centro-symmetric form, specifically for the benefit of "non-experts" (The Standard
Model (of Particle Physics) Explained, Fact/Myth, 3 March 2016). Insights into ordering fundamental particles have however been
explored through use of the Freudenthal magic square (M. S. El Naschie, Freudental magic square and its dimensional implication for ...
137 and high energy physics, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 36, 2008, 3, pp. 546-549). Such preoccupations are clearly far from the
checklists through which efforts to order and communicate global strategy are made -- presumably because these are held to be
inherently more readily comprehensible.
Self-reference and self-reflection? Observation plays a critical role in quantum phenomena. The quantum perspective endeavours to
address the problematic implications of wave function collapse as a consequence of "observation" during the process of measurement.
As noted by Wendt:
In most interpretations of quantum theory particles cannot be said to exist prior to measurement, and in preparing quantum
systems for observation an entanglement is created with the observer that affects what is eventually seen. That does not mean
that the observer literally creates reality, but it does mean that she participates in what is actually observed, and as such
observation cannot even in principle approximate the classical ideal of [subject-object] separation (p. 36)
It would however appear that, as observers, physicists are inherently averse to exploring the implications of any form of "self-reference"
in the quest for a Theory of Everything. This contrasts with concerns articulated from a cybernetic perspective in considering means of
control of complex systems, and potentially those of significance to global governance (Maurice Yolles, Knowledge Cybernetics: a new
metaphor for social collectives, Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 3, 2006, 1). From that perspective,
feedback processes of first, second, third and possibly higher order are envisaged, engaging any observer to an ever higher degree, as
discussed with respect to Cybernetics of cybernetics: complex adaptive systems? (Consciously Self-reflexive Global Initiatives, 2007).
Such ever more intimate engagement is clearly a feature valued in the implications of fundamental symbols and the meditative reflection
they evoke, and for which they are a focus. Whilst such higher order reflection may be implicit in some symbols, the structure of the
triskelion potentially offers an indication of such nested levels through its three-fold form -- appropriately labyrinthine, given the challenge
to comprehension. It is even tempting to recognize that the number of spiralling circles is of a similar order to the number of degrees of
self-reference which can be variously envisaged. The three-colour requirement for a quark then suggests the need for the complementary
"cognitive labyrinths" as distinguished by the three colours used in some of the images above.
Dysfunctional avoidance of paradox: Issues of self-reference lend themselves to exploration in terms of the challenge of self-
signification as argued from a phenomenological perspective by Steven M. Rosen (How Can We Signify Being? Semiotics and Self-
signification, Cosmos and History: the journal of natural and social philosophy, 10, 2014, 2). He sees this objective as having been
tacitly subverted by the semiotic structure of conventional phenomenological writing. In summary:
First it is demonstrated that the three components of the sign -- sign-vehicle, object, and interpretant (C. S. Peirce) -- bear an
external relationship to each other when treated conventionally. This is linked to the abstractness of alphabetic language, which
objectifies nature and splits subject and object. It is the subject-object divide that phenomenology must surmount if it is to signify
Being. To this end, we go beyond alphabetic convention and explore the use of iconic signs. Following the lead of Merleau-
Ponty, the iconic expression of Being is seen as entailing paradox, and we are directed to the fields of visual geometry and
topology, where we work with three paradoxical figures: the Necker cube, Moebius strip, and Klein bottle. While the Necker
cube and Moebius prove to have their limitations in fully signifying Being, the Klein bottle, possessing an added dimension (made
palpable via a stereogram), can embody Being more intimately, provided that it is approached in a radically non-classical way.
Occlusion of portions of the triskelion: Whether in 2D or 3D, the triskelion images offer the possibility of indicating different
"pathologies" of the sustainability represented by the pattern as a whole. With respect to requisite self-reflexivity, the manner and degree
of occlusion are then indicative of reduced cognitive functionality. Examples of this approach are presented below.
Thanks are due to Cadell Last for enabling the concluding sections,
but for which he should not be held responsible
References
H. Atmanspacher. Quantum Approaches to Consciousness: critical survey. Stanford University Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006 [text]
Ron Atkin. Multidimensional Man; can man live in 3-dimensional space? Penguin, 1981
Ralph G. Beil. A Triadic Theory of Elementary Particle Interactions and Quantum Computation. Press of Arisbe Associates, 2007
Ralph G. Beil and Kenneth L. Ketner. A Triadic Theory of Elementary Particle Interactions and Quantum Computation. Institute for
Studies in Pragmaticism, 2006. 49 pp. [review]
David M. Boje and Tonya L. Henderson. Being Quantum: ontological storytelling in the Age of Antenarrative. Cambridge Scholars
Publishing, 2014
Ernst Cassirer. Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Yale University Press, 1923-1929 [summary]
J. C. Cooper. Triquetra/Triskele/Fylfot. In: An Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Traditional Symbols. Thames and Hudson, 1987
Jared Diamond. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Viking Press, 2005 [summary]
Daniel Dervin. Creativity and Culture: a psychoanalytic study of the creative process in the arts, sciences, and culture. Fairleigh
Dickinson Univ Press, 1990
Henry Etzkowitz. Triple Helix: a new model of innovation, SNS Press, 2005 (in Swedish)
Eva Rydberg Fåhraeus. A Triple Helix of Learning Processes: how to cultivate learning, communication and collaboration among
distance-education learners. Stockholm University, 2003 [text]
Nick Herbert. Quantum Reality: beyond the new physics. Anchor Books/Doubleday, 1985
Douglas Hofstadter:
Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid: a metaphorical fugue on minds and machines in the spirit of Lewis Carroll. Basic
Books, 1979 [summary]
Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies. Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1995
I Am a Strange Loop, 2007 [summary]
Douglas Hofstadter and Emmanuel Sander:
Surfaces and Essences: analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. Basic Books, 2013
L'Analogie. Coeur de la pensée. Editions Odile Jacob, 2013
George Lakoff and Mark Johnson:
Philosophy in the Flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books, 1999
Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.
George Lakoff and Rafael E. Nunez. Where Mathematics Comes From: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic
Books, 2000
Patrick Lewtas. What It Is Like to Be a Quark. Joumal of Consciousness Studies, 20, 2013, pp. 9-10, 39-64.
Glenys Livingstone. Celebrating the Triple Spiral: a PaGaian cosmology. PaGaian Cosmology, 2007 [text]
A. Mikhailova and B. Pavlov. Resonance Triadic Quantum Switch. 2001 [text]
Giuseppe Naimo. Consciousness: a triadic process. Murdoch University, 2002 [abstract]
Paavo Pylkkänen. Can quantum analogies help us to understand the process of thought? Mind and Matter, 12, 1, pp. 61-91 [text]
Steven M. Rosen. How Can We Signify Being? Semiotics and Self-signification. Cosmos and History: the journal of natural and social
philosophy, 10, 2014, 2 [text]
Victor Stenger. The Myth of Quantum Consciousness. The Humanist, 53, 1992, 3, pp. 13-15 [text]
Radek Trnka and Radmila Lorencova. Quantum Anthropology: man, cultures, and groups in a quantum perspective. Charles University
Karolinum Press, 2006
Francisco Varela:
Laying Down a Path in Walking: essays on enactive cognition. Zone Books/MIT Press, 1997
Laying Down a Path in Walking: a biologist's look at a new biology. Cybernetic, 2, 1987, pp. 6-15. [text]
Alexander Wendt:
Quantum Mind and Social Science: unifying physical and social ontology. Cambridge, 2015
Flatland: Quantum Mind and the International Hologram. In: Mathias Albert, et al. (Eds), New Systems Theories of World Politics,
Palgrave Macmillan, 2010
Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, 1999
Stephen Wolinsky. Quantum Consciousness: guide to experiencing quantum psychology. Bramble Book, 1993
Danah Zohar and Ian Marshall. The Quantum Society. Morrow, 1995
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
For further updates on this site, subscribe here