Annex 9: Guidelines, Tool, and Summary of Findings Template For Content Evaluation of Deped-Developed Adm Modules
Annex 9: Guidelines, Tool, and Summary of Findings Template For Content Evaluation of Deped-Developed Adm Modules
Annex 9: Guidelines, Tool, and Summary of Findings Template For Content Evaluation of Deped-Developed Adm Modules
Objectives
To evaluate the content of the assigned ADM modules for compliance with the content standards of the
Department of Education.
To write specific comments and findings on pages of the ADM modules where inadequacies in content
and/or errors are found.
To prepare and submit a report using the prescribed Content Evaluation Tool and Summary of Findings
template for each assigned ADM module.
To discuss with the development team/s the comments, recommendations, and revisions to be
implemented on the ADM modules (if needed).
Mechanics
1. Terms of Reference. The Learning Resource Evaluators (LREs) for content shall perform the following
roles and responsibilities:
1.1 Evaluate and check the assigned modules for conceptual, factual, procedural, pedagogical,
computational, and grammatical errors, violations on social content, and other types of errors.
1.2 Write specific comments, findings, and suggested revisions on the margin of the pages of with
inadequacies or errors in content.
1.3 Accomplish the prescribed evaluation tool and prepare the Summary of Findings Report that shall
guide the development team in implementing the recommended revisions.
1.4 Submit the evaluated ADM materials with marginal comments and the duly accomplished summary
report on a staggered basis until all assigned LRS have been evaluated.
1.5 Discuss with the development team, if needed, to clarify comments and recommendations made in
your content review.
1.6 Review the revised and finalized DDLRs to ensure that corrections/ suggested revisions were
sufficiently and correctly implemented.
3. Allot sufficient time to evaluate and accomplish the Individual Content Evaluation tool and Summary of
Findings for each assigned ADM module.
4. Evaluate the assigned modules one at a time. Read each module page by page to identify possible errors
using the following criterion items found in the Content Evaluation tool (Annex 1) as your guide and in
writing your marginal comments:
B. Learning Competencies
Check the alignment of the content of the LRs with the targeted DepEd Learning
Competencies intended for the learning area and grade level.
D. Instructional Quality
Check the LRs for:
Conceptual errors
Factual errors
Procedural errors
Pedagogical errors
Computational errors
Grammatical errors
Violations on Social Content
Other types of errors
E. Assessment
Check LRs for assessment that:
Helps teacher evaluates learner’s progress
Is aligned with the specific learning objectives
Facilitates self-checks
Are varied
F. Readability
LRs should have:
Words and sentences that are within the level of the target learners
Paragraphs and sentences that are structured to the level of the target learners
Smooth flow of ideas within a lesson and from one lesson to lesson
Good use of transition devices
Lessons, Instructions, exercises, questions, and activities that are clear to the learners
5. Write comments on salient points based on the criteria while examining the module. Highlight the part of the
page that needs to be improved/revised or where the error is found. Specify comments, findings, and
recommendations beside the highlighted portion to guide the development team in revising the modules.
6. Use the Summary of Findings template in Annex 2 to identify the specific parts that need to be corrected /
revised by indicating specific pages and line numbers.
7. Avoid using vague words and nonspecific/generalized comments in your marginal comments (e.g., some
words are not appropriate; many of the examples are not aligned with the content; the sentence is not clear;
the verb is grammatically incorrect)
8. After evaluating the module, go over your marginal comments to validate/confirm that the findings and
recommendations are consistent and thorough and to check that none is missed out.
9. Ensure that all comments and recommendations indicated in the modules are included in the Summary of
Findings report. Notes on the specific pages of the modules must adequately support comments written in
the Summary of Findings report.
10. Provide an overall assessment on the content quality based on the comments and findings noted in the
ADM modules. Encode the Summary of Findings report of the overall findings and recommend if the module
requires minor or major revisions.
11. After individual evaluation of each LR, immediately submit each ADM module with marginal comments and
the duly accomplished summary report on a staggered basis until all assigned modules have been
evaluated.
12. If deemed necessary, discuss your report with the development team/s or focal persons to clarify findings
and agree on the revisions and improvements to be made in the modules evaluated.
Title of Module: A Venture to the Wonders of Reading and Listening Grade Level: 10
Writer: Jelsin L. Dumape and Jessa Mae Pada Illustrator: Dave L. Generalao
Instructions:
1. Carefully read the learning resource (LR) page by page to evaluate the LR for compliance to
standards indicated in the criterion items under the six (6) factors below.
2. Put a check mark () in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is NO,
cite specific pages, briefly indicate the errors found, and give your recommendations in the
attached Summary of Findings form.
3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that does not apply in the LR evaluated.
4. Based on the number of criterion items marked “YES” under each factor, mark the appropriate
column to indicate if the LR complied or not to the standards.
5. For factors with items marked Not Applicable, count the total applicable criterion items and
multiply this with 75% to determine the cutoff for compliance.
Content is consistent with the targeted DepEd Learning Competencies (LCs) intended for the
learning area and grade level.
Not
Complied
Note: The item must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. Complied
4. Content reinforces, enriches, and / or leads to the mastery of the targeted learning
competencies intended for the learning area and grade level.
5. Content is logically developed and organized throughout the material. (Lessons/activities are
arranged from simple to complex, from observable to abstract).
6. The LR contains useful introductions, reviews, summaries, and other devices that facilitate
smooth progression from one lesson to another.
7. Development of lessons allows for review, comparison, and integration with previous lessons.
Standards / Criterion Items Yes No
8. Motivational strategies (e.g., overviews, advance organizers, puzzles, games, etc.) are
provided.
9. The LR uses various teaching and learning strategies to meet individual differences/ learning
styles. (if applicable)
10. The LR develops higher cognitive skills (e.g., critical thinking skills, creativity, learning by
doing, problem solving) and 21st century skills.
11. The LR enhances the development of desirable values and traits such as: (Mark the
appropriate box with an “X” applicable for values and traits only)
11.1 Pride in being a Filipino 11.2 Scientific attitude and reasoning
11.3 Striving for excellence 11.4 Love for country
11.5 Helpfulness, teamwork, cooperation 11.6 Unity
11.7 Desire to learn new things 11.8 Honesty & trustworthiness
11.9 Ability to know right from wrong 11.10 Respect
11.11 Critical and creative thinking 11.12 Productive work
11.13 Others (Please specify) ____________________________
Not
Complied
Complied
Note: At least 8 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor.
Not
Complied
Complied
Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor.
Factor V. Assessment
1. The LR provides useful measures and information that help the teacher evaluate learner’s
progress in mastering the target competencies.
2. Assessments are aligned with the specific objectives and content.
Not
Complied
Complied
Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor.
Standards / Criterion Items Yes No
Factor VI. Readability
3. Sentences and paragraph structures are varied and appropriate to the target user.
4. There is logical and smooth flow of ideas within a lesson and from lesson to lesson.
5. There is consistently good use of transition devices to focus on the main topics and signal a
change of topic.
6. Lessons, instructions, exercises, questions, and activities are clear to the target user.
Not
Complied
Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. Complied
Minor revision. This material is found compliant to the minimum requirements in all six
factors. Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Content
Findings form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.
Major revision. This material is non-compliant to the requirements in one or more factors.
Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Content Findings
form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.
For field validation. This material is found compliant to all factors with NO corrections.
I certify that this evaluation report and the recommendation(s) in the summary report are my own and
have been made without any undue influence from others.
Signature: ______________________________
Title of Module: A Venture to the Wonders of Reading and Listening Grade Level: 10
Specific
Paragraph / Line /
Brief Description of Errors/ Recommendations for
Page number
Findings/ Observations Improving the
(in Chronological Order)
Identified Criterion
None