3-Charge GST
3-Charge GST
3 CHARGE OF GST
🔒🔒1 Examine whether the suppliers are eligible for composition scheme in
the following independent cases. Is there any other option available
for concessional tax payment with any of these suppliers, wherever
composition scheme cannot be availed?
(a) M/s. Devlok, a registered dealer, is dealing in intra-State
trading of electronic appliances in Jaipur (Rajasthan). It has
turnover of ` 130 lakh in the preceding financial year. In the
current financial year, it has also started providing repairing
services of electronic appliances.
(b) M/s. Narayan & Sons, a registered dealer, is running a
“KhanaKhazana” Restaurant near City Palace in Jaipur. It has
turnover of ` 140 lakh in the preceding financial year. In the
current financial year, it has also started dealing in intra-State
trading of beverages in Jaipur (Rajasthan).
(c) M/s. Indra & Bro, a registered dealer, is providing restaurant
services in Uttarakhand. It has turnover of ` 70 lakh in the
preceding financial year. It has started providing intra-State
interior designing services in the current financial year and
discontinued rendering restaurant services.
(d) M/s. Him Naresh, a registered dealer, is exclusively providing
intra-State architect services in Uttarakhand. It has turnover of
` 40 lakh in the preceding financial year.
🔑🔑 As per section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017, the following registered persons,
whose aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year did not exceed `
1.5 crore, may opt to pay tax under composition levy:
(a) Manufacturer,
(b) Persons engaged in making supplies referred to in clause (b) of
paragraph 6 of Schedule II (restaurant services), and
All the procurements (both goods and services) of the firm are from
the suppliers registered under regular scheme in the State of
Maharashtra. The firm pays tax under composition scheme.
B & D Company has furnished the following details with respect to its
turnover (exclusive of taxes) and stock (exclusive of taxes):
The entire stock of the products ‘P’ and ‘Q’ available with the firm as
on 30.09.20XX is purchased during the said half year except a
consignment of product ‘P’ valuing ` 3,00,000, which was purchased
in the April month of the preceding financial year. In the current
financial year, in the month of October, no purchases were made, and
the products were sold with a profit margin of 20% on sales [exclusive
of taxes].
The extract of the only bill book maintained by the firm showed the
following details-
S. Particulars (`)
No.
🔑🔑 As per section 10(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification
No.14/2019 CT dated 07.03.2019 as amended, the option availed of by a
registered person to pay tax under composition scheme shall lapse with
effect from the day on which his aggregate turnover during a financial
year exceeds ` 1.5 crore [` 75 lakh in case of Special Category States
except Assam, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir].
As per section 2(6) of the CGST Act, 2017, aggregate turnover means the
aggregate value of all taxable supplies (excluding the value of inward
supplies on which tax is payable by a person on reverse charge basis),
exempt supplies, exports of goods or services or both and inter-State
supplies of persons having the same PAN, to be computed on all India
basis but excludes CGST, SGST/UTGST, IGST and GST Compensation Cess.
In the given case, the firm is registered under the composition scheme in
the State of Maharashtra. The aggregate turnover of the firm exceeds
` 1.5 crore on 03.10.20XX [aggregate of both taxable and exempt turnover
from 01.04.20XX to 03.10.20XX, i.e. ` 1,50,05,000 (` 1,44,65,000 +
` 2,03,000 + ` 1,38,250 + ` 1,06,250 + `92,500)]
The inward supplies of goods transportation services in respect of which
the firm has to pay tax under reverse charge have not been included in the
aggregate turnover in terms of section 2(6) of the CGST Act, 2017. The tax
is payable under reverse charge on such services as the applicable rate of
tax on such services is given as 5% and not 12%, in which case the GTA
would have been liable to pay tax under forward charge [Notification No.
13/2017 CT (R) dated 28.06.2017 as amended].
Thus, the firm will have to pay tax under regular scheme (Section 9 of the
CGST Act, 2017) from 03.10.20XX.
Total CGST liability for the period 60,015 [31,500 + 26,500 + 2015]
from 01.04.20XX to 02.10.20XX
Total SGST liability for the period 60,015 [31,500 + 26,500 + 2015]
from 01.04.20XX to 02.10.20XX
🔒🔒3 XYZ Ltd., New Delhi, manufactures biscuits under the brand name
‘Tastypicks’. Biscuits are supplied to wholesalers and distributors
located across India on FOR basis from the warehouse of the company
located at New Delhi. The company uses multiple modes of transport
for supplying the biscuits to its customers spread across the country.
The transportation cost is shown as a line item in the invoice and is
billed to the customers with a mark-up of 2% on total amount of
freight paid (inclusive of taxes).
Flour used for the production process is procured from vendors
located in Madhya Pradesh on ex-factory basis. The company engages
goods transport agencies (GTA) to transport the flour from the
factories of the vendors to its factory located in New Delhi.
The company has provided the following data relating to
transportation of biscuits and flour in the month of April 20XX:
- For sales within the NCR region (` 20,00,000), the company
arranged a local mini-van belonging to an individual and paid
him ` 54,000.
- For sales to locations in distant States (` 1,78,00,000), the
company booked the goods by Indian Railways and paid rail
freight of ` 3,17,000.
- For sales to locations in neighbouring States (` 55,00,000), the
company booked the goods by road carriers (GTAs) and paid
road freight of ` 3,73,000. Out of the total sales to
neighbouring States, goods worth ` 10,00,000 were booked
through a GTA which paid tax @ 12%. Freight of ` 73,000 was
paid to such GTA.
28.06.2017.]
Transportation of
biscuits in a local
minivan belonging to 54,000 - 55,080 6,610
an individual
Transportation of
biscuits by Indian 3,17,000 15,850 3,39,507 40,741
Railways
Transportation of
biscuits by GTA 3,00,000 15,000 3,21,300 38,556
Transportation of
biscuits by GTA @ 12% 73,000 8,760 83,395 10,007
🔑🔑 As per section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification No.
14/2019 CT dated 7.03.2019, a registered person, whose aggregate
turnover in the preceding financial year did not exceed ` 1.5 crore, may
opt to pay, in lieu of the tax payable by him, an amount calculated at the
specified rates if, inter alia, he is not engaged in the supply of services
other than restaurant services.
However, the scheme permits supply of other marginal services for a
specified value along with the supply of goods and restaurant service, as
the case may be. Such marginal services can be supplied for a value up to
10% of the turnover in the preceding year or ` 5 lakh, whichever is higher.
It is important to note that the exempt services are included in the
definition of aggregate turnover [Section 2(6) of the CGST Act, 2017].
However, Order No. 01/2019 CT dated 01.02.2019 has been issued to
clarify that the value of supply of exempt services by way of extending
deposits, loans or advances in so far as the consideration is represented by
way of interest or discount, shall not be taken into account –
(i) for determining the eligibility for composition scheme under
second proviso to section 10(1) i.e. supplying services of value not
exceeding 10% of the turnover in the preceding financial year in a
State or ` 5 lakh, whichever is higher;
(ii) in computing aggregate turnover in order to determine eligibility
for composition scheme.
Thus, exempt services shall also be considered for determining the
eligibility for composition scheme under second proviso to section 10(1)
and in computing aggregate turnover in order to determine eligibility for
composition scheme. The only exception is interest received from deposits,
loans etc.
In the given case, the aggregate turnover of Shubhlaxmi Foods from
restaurant services in the preceding FY is ` 140 lakh. Therefore, it is
eligible to opt for composition scheme in the current FY.
Further, apart from restaurant services, it can provide services upto ` 14
lakh [i.e. 10% of ` 140 lakh or ` 5 lakh, whichever is higher], in the current
FY. As already seen, bank interest of ` 20 lakh from fixed deposits will not
be considered while determining this limit.
Further, Shubhlaxmi Foods is expected to provide the exempt services of
supply of farm labour worth ` 10 lakh in current financial year. Thus,
turnover of supply of farm labour [` 10 lakh] alongwith the turnover of
restaurant services [` 130 lakh] will be eligible for composition scheme, in
the current financial year.
Tax rate applicable for restaurant services under composition scheme is
5% [2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST]. Estimated tax payable by Shubhlaxmi
Foods is as under:
= ` 140 lakh [` 130 lakh + ` 10 lakh] × 5%
= ` 7 lakh [CGST = ` 3.5 lakh and SGST = ` 3.5 lakh]
Apr-Jun 10 lakh
Jul-Sep 20 lakh
🔑🔑 As per section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification
No.14/2019 CT dated 07.03.2019, a registered person, whose aggregate
turnover in the preceding financial year did not exceed ` 1.5 crore, may
opt to pay, in lieu of the tax payable by him, an amount calculated at the
specified rates if, inter alia, he is not engaged in the supply of services
other than restaurant services.
However, the scheme permits supply of other marginal services for a
specified value along with the supply of goods and restaurant service, as
the case may be. Such marginal services can be supplied for a value up to
10% of the turnover in the preceding year or ` 5 lakh, whichever is higher.
In the present case, since the turnover of Mr. Prem is ` 120 lakh in
preceding financial year, he is eligible for composition scheme in the
current financial year. Further, in the current financial year, he can also
supply services other than restaurant services for a value upto ` 12 lakh
(10% of ` 120 lakh) or ` 5 lakh, whichever is higher. Thus, till the time his
turnover from food delivery services does not exceed ` 12 lakh, he is
eligible for the scheme.
In terms of section 31(3)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, Mr. Prem is required to
issue Bill of Supply in both the cases i.e. while providing restaurant
services and food delivery services. He shall also mention the words
“composition taxable person, not eligible to collect tax on supplies” at the
top of the bill of supply issued by him.
🔒🔒7 M/s Heeralal and Sons registered in Karnataka has opted to avail the
benefit of composition scheme. It has furnished the following details
for the tax period ended on 30-06-20XX.
S. No. Items `
Using the above information, calculate tax to be paid by the firm for
the tax period ended on 30.06.20XX in following independent
situations:
🔒🔒8 Mr. Sanjay of New Delhi made a request for a Motor cab to "Super
ride" for travelling from New Delhi to Gurgaon (Haryana). After Mr.
Sanjay pays the cab charges using his debit card, he gets details of the
driver Mr. Jorawar Singh and the cab's registration number.
"Super ride" is a mobile application owned and managed by D.T. Ltd.
located in India. The application "Super ride" facilitates a potential
customer to connect with the persons providing cab service under the
brand name of "Super ride".
D.T. Ltd. claims that cab service is provided by Mr. Jorawar Singh and
hence, he is liable to pay GST. With reference to the provisions of
IGST Act, 2017, determine who is liable to pay GST in this case?
Would your answer be different, if D.T. Ltd. is located in New York
(USA)? Also briefly state the statutory provisions involved.
🔒🔒9. MN Ltd. has two registered places of business in the State of Haryana.
Its aggregate turnover during the previous financial year for both the
places of business was ` 62 lakh. It wishes to opt for composition levy
for one of the place of business in the current year and wants to
continue with registration and pay taxes at the normal rate for the
other place of business. Can MN Ltd. do so? Explain with reason.
🔑🔑 As per proviso to section 10(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, where more than
one registered persons are having the same PAN issued under the
Income-tax Act, 1961, the registered person shall not be eligible to opt for
the composition scheme unless all such registered persons opt to pay tax
under composition scheme.
In the given case, since MN Ltd. has two places of business (they are not
separate entities under Income-tax Act, 1961), they would be registered
under the same PAN. Therefore, MN Ltd. cannot opt for composition levy
for only one of the places of business and pay tax under regular scheme
for other place of business.