Case Analysis: A. Relevant Facts
Case Analysis: A. Relevant Facts
Case Analysis: A. Relevant Facts
Dotarot
Course & Year: BSA-3
CASE ANALYSIS
A. Relevant Facts
Bert Cruz has been working for 6 months as staff assistant for a law form,
Alvendia and Castro. Currently he is assigned to the case of Ryan manufacturing
Company under the supervision of Carlo Reyes, an experienced senior lawyer. During
lunch on the first day, Carlos says, “it will be necessary for us to work few extra hours on
our own time to make sure we come in on budget. This case isn’t very profitable
anyway, and we don’t want to hurt our firm by going over budget. We can accomplish
this easily by coming in half hour early, taking short lunch break, and working an hour or
so after normal quitting time. We just won’t write that time down on our time report.”
Bert read in the company's approach manual that working hours and not charging for
them on the time report is an infringement of Alvendia and Castro business strategy. He
additionally realizes that seniors are paid rewards, rather than extra time, while staffs
are paid for additional time however get no rewards.
B. Ethical Issue
The ethical issue face in the scenario is that, is it ethical for Bert to work beyond
his work hours and to not record them as hours worked?
D. Available Alternatives
This section deals with different ways in which the problem can be resolved.
Typically, being creative at this stage helps. Bert can decide on the following alternatives
to solve the said dilemma; Bert may refuse to work the additional work hours suggested
by his supervisor Carlo Reyes. He may also inform him that he will not work the
additional hours or he will charge the additional hours to the engagement. Also, he may
also perform in the manner requested. Bert can also talk to the manager about Carlos
request or directly talk to Carlos about his concern. He may also refuse to work in the
engagement to avoid conflict or quit work in the firm.
F. Appropriate Action
In every situation we should always choose the best alternative to decide on
what circumstance best fit to solve the issue. Best alternative should be in accordance
with what is ethically and morally right. The key to making effective decisions is to think
about choices in terms of their ability to accomplish our most important goals. This
means we have to understand the difference between immediate and short-term goals
and longer-range goals. A choice that produces unintended and undesirable results is
ineffective. All decisions have an ethical or moral dimension for a simple reason—they
have an effect on others. Ethical decisions generate and sustain trust; demonstrate
respect, responsibility, fairness and caring; and are consistent with good citizenship.
These behaviors provide a foundation for making better decisions by setting the ground
rules for our behavior. As such, ethics are moral principles that guide a person’s
behavior.
As for Bert, the best alternative would be talking to Carlos. In such a way it would
mitigate possible conflict and would create a healthy work environment. Carlos may also
be enlightened by doing so, talking to him can be a way to end such unethical behavior
for which in a long run would create a positive impact to the both of them as
professionals. It would also create and motivate other workers to work and decide
things in accordance to what is morally and ethically right. By also doing this, both Bert
and Carlos would still attain a good reputation in their workplace. By deciding ethically,
it makes Bert feel good about it – by being true to himself, he will feel good about the
ethical decisions he make. Many people report that they find gift giving more rewarding
than receiving a gift. Though that is not an ethical analogy it does speak to the
importance of doing good for others. Being honest is part of being ethical and you will
likely feel good about being an ethical business person.