On The SEM Features of Glass-Epoxy Composite System Subjected To Dry Sliding Wear
On The SEM Features of Glass-Epoxy Composite System Subjected To Dry Sliding Wear
On The SEM Features of Glass-Epoxy Composite System Subjected To Dry Sliding Wear
Abstract
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) features of glass fiber–epoxy composites subjected to sliding wear for distances ranging from
500 m to 6 km are recorded in this work. The results have shown that there is an existence of noticeable features on the worn surfaces.
Thus for the longer run case interface separation is noticed, while for shorter runs matrix debris formation and occasional glass fiber
fragmentation are seen. The work also highlights the effect of load and sliding velocity on the wear loss pattern. © 2001 Published by
Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: Glass–epoxy; Pin-on-disc; Dry sliding wear; SEM observations
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic showing the mounting of the test piece in the pin
holder assembly and (b) inset of the G–E test sample showing glass fabric Fig. 3. A plot describing weight loss vs. sliding velocity for a sample at
arrangement. 40 N load.
210 Kishore et al. / Wear 247 (2001) 208–213
Fig. 4. SEM photograph showing the features of worn surface at 500 m sliding distance, 40 N and 3 m/s.
by the surface features as seen in SEM photomicrographs for the exposed longitudinal fibers to fragment thus bringing
taken at the central region of the worn surfaces. out the effect of distance on the wear surface features. The
Fig. 4 records the SEM features of the worn surfaces for matrix (Fig. 5) retains less of the wide spread, continuous
the 0.5 km at constant values of load (40 N) and velocity mass-like features seen in Fig. 4. Further the matrix debris
(3 m/s). The spread of the matrix and faint cracks, with some appear (Fig. 5) in increasing amount and the discontinuous
debris (marked ‘P’) are noticed. However, a detailed exam- glass fibers that are fragmented are distributed at random
ination of the 1 km run sample showed (Fig. 5) a tendency orientations (for example, at regions marked ‘F’).
Fig. 5. Surface features showing the SEM observation for 1 km run at 40 N and 3 m/s.
Kishore et al. / Wear 247 (2001) 208–213 211
Fig. 6. SEM surface features for 2 km run at 40 N, 3 m/s showing debris on the sample surface.
Increasing amounts of debris are noticed in longer run longer sliding distance of 6 km (40 N, 3 m/s) is depicted
sample (2 km, Fig. 6). The spread of the debris partly in Fig. 8, wherein in addition to debris formation and bro-
masks the fibers at regions marked ‘K’ on top center of ken fibers, crater formation due to combined factors like
the photograph. Fig. 7 features situation prevailing for still the long wearing-in process coupled with widening of an
longer run case (4 km). Both transverse and longitudinal existing defect (for instance a void) and its emergence at
fibers can be noticed. Also visible are a few broken fibers the surface leading to hollow appearance. Consequently,
(marked by arrows). The test sample subjected to still in this photomicrograph, the subsurface (underneath) layer
Fig. 7. SEM surface features depicting fragmentation of fibers with debris on the surface of sample at 4 km sliding distance, 40 N and 3 m/s.
212 Kishore et al. / Wear 247 (2001) 208–213
Fig. 8. SEM picture for 6 km run sample at 40 N, 3 m/s showing a crater-like feature.
clearly exposed due to the parting off of the top layer is On the other hand, increasing the load to 60 N (Fig. 10) has
noticed. The matrix debris seen in the photomicrograph the effect of showing the features resembling interface sepa-
could be an additional factor in furthering the wear process ration (across the top region of the photograph). Besides the
[11]. matrix has a coloration change probably effected by the fric-
The effect of changing the load to either 20 or 60 N at tional heat developed. Summarizing, the photomicrographs
sliding distance (4 km) and velocity (3 m/s) is brought out in (Figs. 7, 9 and 10) presented earlier corroborate the general
Figs. 9 and 10, respectively. Compared to Fig. 7, the surface trend seen in weight changes in that the matrix debris for-
features depicts (Fig. 9) less of fiber exposure thus highlight- mation and fragmentation of fibers are larger when the value
ing the effect of decreasing the applied load from 40 to 20 N. of the applied load is higher.
Fig. 9. SEM picture depicting worn surface features for 4 km run sample at a load of 20 N and velocity of 3 m/s.
Kishore et al. / Wear 247 (2001) 208–213 213
Fig. 10. SEM photograph showing features at 60 N, 3 m/s, for 4 km distance run sample.
4. Conclusions References
The worn surface features reflect characteristically the [1] Scott D. Henry, (Ed.) in “Materials for friction and wear
applications”, ASM Handbook, ASM International, Materials Park,
effect of total distance run during slide wear experiments.
Pa., U.S.A. 18 (1992) 820.
Thus small distances run sample show a varying trend [2] R. Ramesh, Kishore, R.M.V.G.K. Rao, Dry sliding wear studies in
for the matrix from continuous mass-like feature to small glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites, Wear 89 (1983) 131.
amount of debris formation. The longest run sample, on [3] S.K. Biswas, Kalyani Vijayan, Friction and wear of PTFE — a
the other hand, display interface separation features besides review, Wear 158 (1992) 193.
[4] Klaus Friedrich, Wear of reinforced polymers by different abrasive
debris getting detached. This situation leads to an increased
counterparts, K. Friedrich (Ed.), in: Friction and Wear of
wear and a general coloration change on the surface. The Polymer Composites, Composite Materials Series, Vol. 1, Elsevier,
samples subjected to wear for the sliding distances in the Amsterdam, 1986, p. 233.
range 0.5 m–6 km show features like increase in matrix [5] H. Lee, K. Nevilee, Handbook of Epoxy Resins, Mc Graw-Hill, New
debris formation, fibers breakage and exposure of both york, 1967, pp. 1–5.
[6] Hans Domininghaus, Plastics for Engineers-Materials, Properties,
longitudinal and transverse fibers due to the wear of the
Applications, Hanser publishers, Munich, 1993, p. 659 (J. Haim, D.
matrix. Hyatt, Trans.).
[7] Kishore, S. Venkatraman, Impact behavior of glass–epoxy composites
containing foam material, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 67 (1998) 1565.
Acknowledgements [8] Kishore, P. Sampathkumaran, S. Seetharamu, A. Murali, R.K. Kumar,
Dry sliding wear behavior of glass–epoxy Composite, J. Reinf. Plast.
Compos. 18 (1) (1999) 55.
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of [9] P. Sampathkumaran, S. Seetharamu, A. Murali, R.K. Kumar, Kishore,
Mr. D. Mollaiah for the help rendered and the Chairman Sliding wear studies in glass–epoxy system through scanning
of the Department of Metallurgy (Prof. D.H. Sastry) for microscopic observations, Bull. Mater. Sci. 21 (4) (1998) 335.
the keen interest shown in the work. The authors thank the [10] Robert A. Storer, (Ed.) in Annual book of ASTM Standards, Sec.
3, 03.02, “Wear testing with a pin-on-disc apparatus” ASTM G 99,
CPRI management for the permission extended to publish
Pa, U.S.A. (1997) p. 392.
this paper. The authors also thank Mr. S. Vynatheya and Mr. [11] B. Vishwanath, A.P. Verma, C.V.S. Kameswara Rao, Effect of matrix
M.R. Mohan for the help rendered in taking SEM pictures content on strength and wear of woven roving glass polimeric
and in conducting experiments, respectively. composites, Compos. Sci. Technol. 44 (1992) 77.