0 A 85 DB 9 Da 07 Afa 25
0 A 85 DB 9 Da 07 Afa 25
3, 2018
Comparisons are made between the test results, E: Modulus of elasticity (Gpa)
by using two different approaches. The results
shows effect of various cut-out shapes, 3. Materials and Experimental Procedure
orientation of fiber, aspect ratio and length to The critical load of composite material was
thickness ratio on the buckling load (All measured for the following cases:-
specimen were loaded slowly until buckling) [5]. 1-Different types of reinforcement fiberglass
Ganesan et al. studied the presence of holes (Random, mat), jute, and Eggshell (SIC,
redistributes the membrane (E-glass woven
as powder with polyester as the matrix were used
roving with polyester resin.) stresses in the plates
the volume fraction is 30% for all types.
and may reduce their stability significantly. The
2-Three type of fixation were used, such as
buckling of such perforated plates deal with the
(Fixed-fixed end, Pin -fixed end, Pin-pin end)
buckling analysis of symmetrically and laminated
3-Three type of length (400,500,600 mm) were
composite plates under two sides simply
used The Materials Used:
supported and two sides free boundary condition.
The hardener used is (Methyl Ethyl Keton
The effects on buckling load by various cut out
Peroxide “MEKP”)
shapes (circular, squared elliptical) and sizes are
investigated. It was observed that the plate with
Table 1: The properties for epoxy (Sikadur-300)
the circular cutout yielded the greatest critical
buckling load when compared with the square Properties Unit Q
and elliptical cutouts [6]. Density Kg\ 1.3
Oleiwi estimated the critical load of Tensile strength MPa 30
unidirectional polymer matrix composite plate by
E-modulus GPa 3800
using experimental and finite element techniques
at different fiber angles and fiber volume fraction
from glass fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester). Table (2) the properties for E-glass [Hull 1981]
The composite specimens were prepared by hand Properties Unit E-Glass
lay-up technique with different fiber volume Density Kg\ 2.5
fraction Vf, aspect ratio and angle of The results Tensile strength GPa 1.4-2.5(typical)
illustrated the critical load decreases in nonlinear E-modulus GPa 76
relationship with the increases of the fiber angle
and that it increases with the increases of the fiber I. Specimen’s preparation
volume fraction [7]. The specimens used, are prepared in the
Parth Bhavsar buckling behavior of glass fiber workshop laboratory, University of Al-
reinforced polymer subjected to linearly varying Mustansiriya by hand-Lay-up moulding, using an
loading has been studied by finite element open glass mould with dimensions (65cm*50cm).
method effects of varios parameters on the before pouring begins ,mould sides and surface
buckling load of rectangular plates with aspect treated chemically with paraffin for the purpose
ratios1 have been investigated [8]. of closing the spaces and take out the sample
The aim of this research was to study the easily ,putting plastic sheet, fixed fiber glass
influence of addition (5%) from (SiC,〖AL〗 ,(epoxy and hardener) deposited on the mould by
_(2O_3 ) egg shell) and increase of the length on brush ,any air which may be entrapped was
critical load to synthetic and natural composite removed using serrated steel roller, again plastic
column made from of unsaturated polyester sheet cover mold upper part by applying poly
reinforced by( matrix and random glass- vinyle alcohol inside the sheet as releasing agent.
fibers)and jute fiber as natural fiber . Then heavy flat metal rigid platform was kept top
of plate for compressing purpose. Left for (48hr)
Theory before being transported to cut to exact shape for
Column fails by buckling when the axial testing.
compressive load exceeds some critical load. The In this study, three different plate lengths were
critical load of the composite column can be used: 400mm, 500mm and600mm. The width
calculated from the Euler equation as follows [7] (19mm) and thickness of the plates are (1.5mm).
(1) II. Experimental apparatus
Where-:
The buckling testing apparatus used in this work
C: is the end condition number ,
(in University of Al-Mstansiriya, Mechanical
L; is the length of the column (m)
department) is shown in Figure 1.
I: is the moment of inertia (m^4)
232
Engineering and Technology Journal Vol. 36, Part A, No. 3, 2018
233
Engineering and Technology Journal Vol. 36, Part A, No. 3, 2018
Buckling (critical load) of composite material is addition except (with jute) give better results and
investigated when discuss the effect of the type of this is can be seen clearly at fig(4-6).
fixture it can be seen that the maximum critical All theoretical charts figs (7-9) the highest value
load occurs with Fixed-fixed ended for all cases. was to the random fiber-glass (with or without
From figures.4, 5, 6 it can be clearly seen that the addition) and this is because of the randomly
egg shell composite sustain higher load while the distributed fibers that cause distribution in stress
jute fiber composite sustains lower load this so increases the resistance of material to
means that the egg shell powder which contains withstand the external force. , while with addition
( is stiffer than jute-fiber the best material is due to it is good
According to the effect of the length, there is properties when compared with others [9]
increase in critical load with addition at a ratio of( Experimental figures differ when compared with
6.5% for SiC,11% for Egg-shell and 13%for theoretical one while using the same (length and
at a length of (400mm) and fixed end fixation method) this is due to method of
method, while reinforce with jute gives decrease preparing the sample (hand lay-up) and
(26%)when it compared with sample (matrix homogenous in properties over all the samples.
glass-fiber and without addition).At
length(500mm)without addition was the best Charts
while At length of (600mm) the samples with Expermental chart
6 Mat
Random
Critical Load N
4 Jute
5% Egg-shell
2
5% SiC
0 5% AL2O3
400 450 500 550 600
Lenght mm
Figure 4: relation between the critical load and the length (Fixed ended)
4 Mat
3 Random
2 Jute
1 5% Egg-shell
0 5% SiC
400 450 500 550 600 5% AL2O3
Lenght mm
Figure 5: relation between the critical load and the length (Pin fixed)
234
Engineering and Technology Journal Vol. 36, Part A, No. 3, 2018
2 Mat
0.5 5% SiC
5% AL203
0
400 450 500 550 600
Lenght mm
Figure 6: relation between the critical load and the length (Pin ended)
Theoretical chart
Randim
2
1.5 Jute
1 5%Egg-shell
0.5 5%SIC
0
400 450 500 550 600 650
Lenght mm
Figure 7: relation between the critical load and the length (Pin ended)
10
Mat
Critical Load N
8 Randim
6 Jute
4 5%Egg-shell
5% SIC
2
5% AL2O3
0
400 450 500 550 600 650
Lenght mm
Figure 8: relation between the critical load and the length (Fixed ended)
235
Engineering and Technology Journal Vol. 36, Part A, No. 3, 2018
Pin-Fixed theoretical
6
5
Critical Load N Mat
4
Randim
3
Jute
2
5% Egg-shell
1
5% SIC
0 5% AL203
400 450 500 550 600 650
Lenght mm
Figure 9: relation between the critical load and the length (Pin fixed)
References
[1] R. Jones “Mechanics of composite materials,”
Second edition 1990.
[2] Y.J. Lee, Lin H.J. and Lin C.C. “A study on the
buckling behavior of an orthotropic Square plate with
a central circular hole" J composite structures, Vol. 13,
No. 173, 188, 1989.
[3] J.K. Oleiwi, “Buckling Analysis of unidirectional
Polymer Matrix Composite Plates,” AL-Khwarizmi
Engineering Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2006.
[4] H. Al Qablan, “Assessment of the Buckling
Behaviour of Square Composite Plates with Circular
233