IA-2A-Scientific Method (DONE)
IA-2A-Scientific Method (DONE)
IA-2A-Scientific Method (DONE)
Lourdes College
Higher Education Department
Investigative Analysis #2
(Scientific Method)
Introduction
Scientific method refers to a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or
correcting and integrating previous knowledge. For Newton (1999), to be termed scientific, a method of inquiring
must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of
reasoning.
A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the
formulation and testing of data through hypothesis. Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another,
identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methodologies of knowledge.
Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies to
test these hypotheses. These steps must be repeatable in order to dependably predict any future results. Theories that
encompass wider domains of inquiry may bring many hypotheses together in a coherent structure.
Scientific research usually proceeds in certain orderly steps. These steps have developed over many years and
have been found to produce accurate results.
So, the steps of scientific method can be thought of as a logical, orderly way to solve a problem or answer a
question. There is no one scientific method.
The following are the steps followed in a scientific method. Its main features are the same in all areas of
science.
3. Form a Hypothesis
After collecting information and making observations, we form a working explanation or trial answer to the
problem. This explanation is called hypothesis. However, no matter how reasonable the hypothesis may seem, it
cannot be accepted until it is tested many times. We must be open-minded enough to change a hypothesis if the
results of the experiments do not support it.
To test a hypothesis, we must design an experiment that focuses directly on the problem being investigated.
The hypothesis must be clearly stated at the beginning of the experiment. The results of the experiment may or
may not support the hypothesis.
All experiments have variables. A variable is a factor that can change in an experiment. Temperature, length
of time, size, and chemical composition are possible variables with which we may be familiar. Scientific
experiments are frequently designed so that only one variable is tested in each experiment. The variable being
tested is called the experimental variable.
Strauss and Lisowski (1955) stressed that most scientific experiments are designed to consider only one
experimental variable. To add certainty to the cause-and-effect relationship between the experimental variable and
the observed results, all other variables must be controlled. In a controlled setup, all factors remain the same
during the experiment, except for the change in the experimental variable.
Lewis Pasteur, a French chemist in 1960, performed an experiment that helped to support biogenesis.
Although other scientists had disproved spontaneous generation, the scientific steps he used finally convinced
most of the remaining skeptics. The experiment still serves as best example of scientific experimentation.
6. Draw Conclusions
Data have value only when valid conclusions are drawn from them. Such conclusions must be based entirely
on facts observed in the experiment. If other experiments continue to support the hypothesis it may come to be
called theory.
A hypothesis that is supported by many experiments done over a period of time is called theory. Like
hypothesis, theories can be confused with facts; theories are not facts. They are probable explanation for events
that are supported by a wide range of evidence.
Surprisingly, we will learn that one of the main characteristics of science is uncertainty. Theories are
constantly challenged and refined as new discoveries are made.
Objectives
Students’ are expected to: (1) enumerate the steps in the scientific method, (2) recognize a problem and
formulate hypotheses, (3) design an experiment given a particular problem, and (4) make generalizations and
conclusions based on a set of data.
Questions
1. Why must a scientist make accurate observations?
A scientist must make accurate observations to help the scientist decide correctly and for the
success of the investigation.
4. What are the variables involved in your experiment? How will you classify them as independent,
dependent, or constant?
Hypothesis : Sugar dissolves faster in heated water
Independent variable : water temperature
Dependent variable : amount of sugar dissolve
Constant : amount of water
5. How can your experimental design be improved? How are other aspects of the problem addressed in this
improvement?
Checking its validity by controlling the variable (changing the amount of water).
b. Hypothesis vs law
Hypothesis is an assumption, to be tested repeatedly to prove a research/investigation.
Law is universally accepted and can never be wrong. If a law were to be proven false, any science
built on that law will also be wrong.
c. Observation vs explanation
Observation pertains to the used of the senses, things that are measured during the investigation.
Explanation is the interpretation based from the observations done in the investigation.