1. Doctrinal research focuses on analyzing legal principles and precedents, while empirical research uses observation and data to understand how law impacts society.
2. The key sources for doctrinal research are legal reports and theories, whereas empirical research incorporates field work and data from a variety of sources.
3. Doctrinal research seeks to understand legal doctrines, while empirical examines broader questions about law's influence and effects.
1. Doctrinal research focuses on analyzing legal principles and precedents, while empirical research uses observation and data to understand how law impacts society.
2. The key sources for doctrinal research are legal reports and theories, whereas empirical research incorporates field work and data from a variety of sources.
3. Doctrinal research seeks to understand legal doctrines, while empirical examines broader questions about law's influence and effects.
1. Doctrinal research focuses on analyzing legal principles and precedents, while empirical research uses observation and data to understand how law impacts society.
2. The key sources for doctrinal research are legal reports and theories, whereas empirical research incorporates field work and data from a variety of sources.
3. Doctrinal research seeks to understand legal doctrines, while empirical examines broader questions about law's influence and effects.
1. Doctrinal research focuses on analyzing legal principles and precedents, while empirical research uses observation and data to understand how law impacts society.
2. The key sources for doctrinal research are legal reports and theories, whereas empirical research incorporates field work and data from a variety of sources.
3. Doctrinal research seeks to understand legal doctrines, while empirical examines broader questions about law's influence and effects.
It is a theoretical research and it is pure in nature.
Conventional legal sources like reports of committees, legal history, judicial pronouncements, facts passed by legislature and parliament etc. are the sources of doctrinal legal research. A doctrinal research means a research that has been carried out on legal propositions i.e. “Doctrinal Research asks what the law is on particular issue. It is concerned with analysis of the legal doctrine and how it has been developed and applied. The topics involve in such research are limited or restricted. Focal point of most of them is on the nature of law; the theories behind particular substantive areas of law, such as constitutional law, criminal law, torts or contract; political or legal authority; the nature of rights, duty, liability, justice etc. The theories of legal interpretation and legal reasoning are also used by the researcher. In doctrinal work the researcher examines concepts of law. This type of research is also known as pure.” Reads and analyses the material Formulates a conclusion Writes up the study result Conventional/Customary Legal Sources Text Books Case Laws published by authorized publisher Statutes, Enactments Periodicals,Web- portals, Websites etc. Reports of committees, Legal History, Judgements Commentaries 1. The study is mainly based on legal propositions (i.e. The reason for the decision which is legally binding and creates precedent). 2. The sources of data for a doctrinal researcher are the reports of Appellate Courts and conventional legal theory. 3. It is concerned with what the particular doctrine of law says and not as what made the authority to say so or what has been the impact of that say. Empirical research is research using empirical evidence. It is a way of gaining knowledge by means of direct and indirect observation or experience. Empirical evidence can be quantitatively or qualitatively. In legal field non-doctrinal research is also known as socio-legal research. Conducting empirical research in law is of recent origin. Empirical means ‘relying solely on observation and experiment, not on theory'. The empirical research is carried out by collection and gathering data or information relating to universe by a first hand study. A legal researcher undertaking or the people and institutions supposedly regulated by law as the focus of his study. Field work is usually required for this type of Research. 1. It tries to find out the impact of non-legal events upon the legal decision process. 2. It seeks to identify and appraise the degree of variables which influence the outcome and legal-decision making. 3. It tries to find out the effect of each decision on people and society as such. 4. It lays different and lesser emphasis on doctrine. 5. It seeks answer to broader and more numerous questions. 1. Title 2. Objectives of the study 3. Formulation of Hypothesis 4. Methodology 5. Selection of sample 6. Sources of Data 7. Data Collection 8. Analysis and Interpretation of Data 9. Verification of findings 10. Conceptualization. Example- Uniform Civil Code 1. Title - Need of Uniform Civil Code in India 2. Objectives of the study- How far uniform civil code will be feasible in India. 3. Formulation of Hypothesis – Uniform Civil Code will bring positive change in Indian society. 4. Methodology – Empirical and Deductive method, Questionnaire for educated and Schedules for uneducated people. 5. Selection of sample – Disproportionate stratified sampling technique. 6. Sources of Data - Both secondary and primary sources. 7. Data Collection-Secondary data from secondary sources. Questionnaire and schedules to collect primary data. 8. Analysis and Interpretation of Data – Qualitative and Quantitative data 9. Verification of findings- The finding of research will be compared with the result of previous similar studies. 10. Conceptualization- The generalization of findings may be stated in the form of concept. Questionnaires Interviews Observation Focus Group Discussion DOCTRINAL RESEARCH EMPIRICAL RESEARCH 1. Emphasis upon Legal 1. Lesser emphasis upon Principles doctrines. 2. Not solely dependent on 2. Use traditional sources of data traditional or conventional 3. Any law trained person can do sources of data. doctrinal research 3. Non-Doctrinal involves particular skills, conceptual 4. Scholar seeks to answer one or framework and knowledge of two legal propositions or other disciplines. questions 4. Non-Doctrinal Research 5. It is a theoretical study involves number of questions and large area. 5. It involves empirical (field) study 1. In a doctrinal Research, the researcher is always engaged in research work, analysis of case laws and judicial pronouncements etc. unlike that in case of non-doctrinal research. Also, doctrinal research is less time consuming. 2. It provides the lawyers, judges and others with the instruments needed to reach a legal decision. 3. Such a Research provides quick answers to the legal problems. 4. Such a Research helps in pointing out the inbuilt loopholes, gaps, ambiguities or inconsistencies in the substantive law. 1. Doctrinal legal research is basically the result of individual analysis of a researcher and the perception of a legal fact of one researcher may vary from another researcher. However, each of these perceptions is equally convincing and logical. Thus, doctrinal legal research is subjective in nature. 2. In many cases it is seen that there is a gap between the actual social behavior and the behavior demanded by the legal norm. Doctrinal Research does not address these gaps. 1. Non-doctrinal research enhances lawyer’s ability to understand the implications and effects on the society. 2. It highlights the gap between legislative goals and social reality and thereby depicts a true picture of law- in-action. 3. It highlights the reasons behind making the law ‘symbolic’, less-effective or ineffective. 4. Legal researches can use social science methodologies themselves to investigate issues, or they can collaborate with skilled researchers from other disciplines. 1. Financial support Is lacking. 2. Other disciplines had shed away from the study of legal order has been shed away. 3. Due to their preoccupation with their profession, the contributions of legal. 4. Legal researchers lack a tradition that enables them to strengthen the empirical.