PG 14, DKT 853: Daniela Testifies No Intent To Bring Civil Suit
PG 14, DKT 853: Daniela Testifies No Intent To Bring Civil Suit
PG 14, DKT 853: Daniela Testifies No Intent To Bring Civil Suit
DANIELA: Yes.
AGNIFILO: Because you are going to bring a civil lawsuit, aren't you?
DANIELA: No.
AGNIFILO: I know you haven't done it but you plan on doing it,
Don't you?
DANIELA: No.
PENZA: Objection.
COURT: Sustained.
PENZA: Objection.
COURT: Sustained. 14
13 This is a lie. Daniela did not need Glazer's services to interact with the government concerning
a "precarious situation with [her] little sister Camila" for the simple reason that Daniela did nol
inform the g vernment that she crcnLed a idenlifi cati on card to get Camila into Mcx ic until
she admitted thi s for the fir t time on cross examination . (See 5/30/19 Tr. at 3047-3048 (admitting
telling it for the first time on cross-examination); see also 5/30/ 19 Tr. at 3050 (testifying that she
didn't "remember exactly" when she thinks she told the government about this fake identification
card).) Notably, Camila is not even one of Glazer's .lane Does or clients. The truth is that Daniela
got Glazer from Vicente to sue Raniere.
14 In light of the fact that Vicente had previously testified that he had hired Glazer for potential
civ iI matters against Ran iere, challenging Dan ie la's false testi mony by reference to how she cam e
to hire Glazer, an absolutely appropriate, non-privileged question, would have put the lie to her
testimony. However, the government actively assisted Daniela in concealing the truth from the
jury by objecting to this question and having that objection sllstain ed.
10