Reynolds Number Meter Proving: by Paul W. Tang, Senior Engineer Specialist
Reynolds Number Meter Proving: by Paul W. Tang, Senior Engineer Specialist
Reynolds Number Meter Proving: by Paul W. Tang, Senior Engineer Specialist
Topics
What is Reynolds Number
Reynolds Number and the Turbine Meter
Reynolds Number Meter Proving
The FortisBC Triple Point Meter Proving Facility
Questions
2
Dimensionless Quantity
3
Dimensionless Quantity
Examples of dimensionless quantities:
For example:
Vobject
Mach Number M =
Vsound
5
Buckingham Pi Theorem
6
No, it is a different
Buckingham Pie kind
?? of pi !
7
Buckingham Pi (π) Theorem
8
Reynolds Number is a good example
of such dimensionless number
9
Osborne Reynolds (1842-1912)
10
Reynolds Number
Inertial Forces
Viscous Forces
11
Dimensional Analysis of Reynolds Number
ρvD
Reynolds Number =
µ
D = characteristic dimension m
12
Dimensional Analysis of Reynolds Number
ρvD
Reynolds Number =
µ
kg·m-3 m·sec-1 m
Re =
kg·m-1·sec-1
Reynolds
ReynoldsNumber
Numberis has
a “Dimensionless Quantity”
no physical unit !
13
Flow Profiles at Various Reynolds Number
ρvD
Re =
µ
16
Dynamic Similarity
17
Dynamic Similarity and Reynolds Number
• The theory of dynamic similarity
stipulates that the same object when
exposed to a flow with the same
Reynolds number would behave the
same way.
• Dynamic similarity makes it possible
to scale results from model tests to
predict corresponding results for the
full‐scale prototype.
18
How does turbine
From Reynolds meter Turbine
Number work ?Meter
19
The Law of Conservation of Energy
Kinetic Energy = Dynamic Energy of Mass in Motion
Velocity = V
KE = 1/2 M V2
Where: KE = Kinetic energy of the moving gas molecules
M = Mass of gas molecules
Mass of gas molecules = M V = Velocity of gas molecules
In an turbine meter, a portion of the linear kinetic energy of the moving gas molecules is
converted into rotational energy of the rotor
20
Principle of Turbine Meters
——————— (1)
——————— (2)
Q i ——————— (3)
1.0
0.5
Constant k-factor
ERROR (%)
‐0.5
‐1.0
0 25 50 75 100 125
CAPACITY (%Qmax)
An ideal turbine meter has a single k‐factor and a flat error curve
extending from Qmin to Qmax
22
Non-ideal Turbine Meter Characteristics
1.0
Non-fluid friction
0.5
Error (%)
-1.0
0 25 50 75 100 125
Capacity (%Qmax)
Performance curve of a “real” gas turbine meter
23
Turbine Meter Error Performance vs Flow Rate
-0.5
-1
0 25 50 75 100 125
Capacity (%Qmax)
Typical Turbine Meter Performance vs Flow Capacity
24
Pipe Flow Reynolds Number
ρvD
Pipe flow Reynolds number =
µ
25
Pipe Flow Reynolds Number
Turbine Meter
Fluid 1
D
Fluid 2
D
ρ1v1D ρ2v2D
Pipe flow Reynolds number = =
µ1 µ2
Based on the theory of Dynamic Similarity, a turbine meter is expected to
behave in the same way even when it is exposed to a different fluid if the
Reynolds number of the two flows are identical.
26
Reynolds Number
References:
(1) Effects of Line Pressure and Density of Turbine Meter Measurement Accuracy Between 30 and 700 psig in Natural Gas,
GRI-03/0050, July 2003;
(2) Effects of Line Pressure and Density of Turbine Meter Measurement Accuracy at Conditions from Atmospheric Air to 700
psig Natural Gas, GRI-03/00172, August 2004;
(3) Measurement of Natural Gas by Turbine Meters, 3rd revision published by AGA, February 2006.
27
Reynolds Number Effect on Turbine Meters
28
Pressure Effect on a Turbine Meter
29
Pressure Effect on a Turbine Meter
Each one of these three
curves has very distinct
and different attributes.
Any one of these three
calibration curves does
not represent the
behavior of the meter
operating under the other
two sets of conditions.
30
Performance Curve Expressed in Reynolds number
31
Reynolds Number
The performance of turbine meters are closely related to Reynolds number
32
Cost of Flow Measurement Error
33
Recommendations in AGA-7 Report
Quote from AGA Report No. 7 February 2006, section 6.3.2 “Calibration Guidelines”
34
Turbine Meter Proving
35
Principle of Transfer Meter Provers
Comparing the volume throughput with a well known
reference under the same conditions
i.e. Testing or converting to the same pressure and temperature
36
A Conventional High Pressure Transfer Prover Loop
Compressor
37
A Conventional High Pressure Transfer Prover Loop
Requirements:
High Pressure
Natural Gas Source • Proximity to high pressure
natural gas pipeline
Filter
38
Meter Calibration with Alternate Fluids
39
The Fortis BC Triple Point High
Pressure Meter Calibration Facility
40
Advantages of using Carbon Dioxide Gas for Proving
Turbine Meters
• Being non‐combustible, carbon dioxide is safer to handle than natural gas at
a test facility;
• Comparing to both natural gas and air, the lower operating pressures needed
to reach the target meter test Reynolds number require less compression;
• The fact that the carbon dioxide meter proving loop can operate at a lower
pressure means that time saving devices such as automated test meter
clamps can be easily and inexpensively deployed;
• The triple point of carbon dioxide occurs much closer to ambient conditions
than most gases, a property that allows the temperature of the flowing gas in
the test loop to be controlled by direct injection of carbon dioxide in the
liquid phase.
41
Advantages of using Carbon Dioxide Gas for Proving
Turbine Meters
……..(3)
2.10 ……..(4)
42
Advantages of using Carbon Dioxide Gas for Proving
Turbine Meters
Similar considerations can be given to ρ(Air)
the density ratios of the gases used in = 1.67 ……..(5)
ρ (Natural gas)
the previous example. Comparing air
with natural gas under the same
operating conditions, the density ratio ρ(CO2)
= 2.75 ……..(6)
is 1.67. The carbon dioxide to natural ρ (Natural gas)
gas density ratio is 2.75.
43
CO2 High Pressure Prover Loop
44
Fortis BC Triple Point Test Facility’s performance standards:
45
Inter-Comparison Program
46
Comparison of test facilities
T e S T
Terasen TransCanada
(Penticton, BC) Calibration
Southwest Research (Ile des Chenes,
Institute Manitoba)
(San Antonio, Tx)
47
Comparison of test facilities
5D 5D 3D 5D 5D 3D 3D
TT TT
TeST Watchdog Artifact Layout
48
Comparison of test facilities
TCC
SwRI
TeST Artifact
49
Artifact - Sensus AAT-230 turbine meter
Comparison of test facilities
50
Comparison of artifact test data
1.00 1.00
0.20 0.20
Error (%)
Error (%)
0.00 0.00
-0.20 -0.20
-0.40 -0.40
-0.60 -0.60
-0.80 -0.80
-1.00 -1.00
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
6 6
Pipe Reynolds Number (x10 ) Pipe Reynolds Number (x10 )
Comparison of Test Results for Meter No. 10510034 Comparison of Test Results for Meter No. 10510035
51
Comparison of Test Facilities
Results show an agreement between the labs
within ±0.08% of reading over the range of
conditions tested.
This result is very similar to historical values of
past inter‐lab comparisons.
52
Comparison of test facilities
53
In Summary
What is Reynolds Number
Reynolds Number and the Turbine Meter
Reynolds Number Meter Proving
The FortisBC Triple Point Meter Proving Facility
Questions
54
Quote:
55
THANK YOU !
www.fortisbc.com/NaturalGas/Business/Measurement