Finding Clara: Establishing The Biographical Details of Clara Peeters (Ca. 1587-After 1636)
Finding Clara: Establishing The Biographical Details of Clara Peeters (Ca. 1587-After 1636)
clara peeters has triumphed. after four cen- her as a particularly talented artist whose work was un-
turies, she has taken centre stage once more. An exhi- surpassed by any other representative of her genre.5
bition dedicated to her work, organised by the Prado Hymans’s belated yet justified praise for Clara was
Museum, has recently been shown both there and at thanks to a passionate young art historian from The
the Rockoxhuis in Antwerp,1 and her work also played Hague, Abraham Bredius (1855–1946). In 1883 Bredius
an important role in the exhibition ‘Slow Food: Still had corresponded with the Antwerp archivist and biog-
Lifes of the Golden Age’, held at the Mauritshuis in rapher Frans Jozef Van den Branden (1837–1922) about
The Hague.2 The reaction to these exhibitions con- Clara Peeters. Van den Branden had just published his
firmed public appreciation of her work, and made it authoritative work, Geschiedenis der Antwerpsche Schil-
clear that she has been relegated to the shadows for far derschool (‘History of the Antwerp School of Painting’),
too long. This highly talented, pioneering still-life art- in which he mentioned the painter Catharina Peeters
ist experienced great success during her lifetime, and – the sister of the painter Bonaventura Peeters – stat-
was much imitated, indicating a life of status and pros- ing that she painted mostly still lifes. He asserted that
perity, although we do not know this for sure, her life Catharina was the creator of the paintings on display
story up until now having been pieced together from in the Prado:
suppositions, hypotheses and unreliable evidence. In-
This museum in Madrid holds her wonderfully painted
deed, the book that accompanied the exhibitions in
Dead Birds and Table Supplies, Salad, Figs, Raisins, and Almonds
Antwerp and Madrid was restricted to a bare minimum next to a vase of flowers, Fish etc.6
of biographical information.3 Clara Peeters deserves
better than that; she deserves an identity. And it is in In a letter dated 19 April 1883, Bredius replied to Van
the service of this cause that I have undertaken my den Branden, saying:
own research, the early results of which are outlined
I regret having to shatter your conjecture regarding Clara
as follows.
Peeters, but the pieces in Madrid actually bear the mark
At the start of the nineteenth century, Clara Peeters
‘Clara Peeters 1611’. Catharina and Clara are therefore two
was on the verge of sinking into obscurity for good, separate painters.7
having been frequently confused with another Antwerp
painter, Catharina Peeters.4 The world was not con- Bredius was the first to make this distinction: Clara was
cerned with Clara Peeters. She continued to remain in not Catharina Peeters. In 1902, Bredius urged the Royal
the shadows until 1894, when Henri Hymans described Museum of Fine Arts in Antwerp to purchase a painting
18 boletín del museo del prado · tomo xxxiv · número 52 · 2016 · issn: 0210-8143
1a
Henrick Joosten’.23 The parish records show that this panels made by Lambrecht Steens,25 and copper bearing
Clara was christened in the Cathedral of Our Lady Pieter Stas’s mark) indicate that Antwerp was where
(North) on 28 May 1620. She was just 19 when she she was working at the time. The pre-1635 mention
married, and is therefore far too young to be Clara of a pastry banquet painting (‘schilderij van suijcker
Peeters the artist. banquet’) painted in 1608 by Claer Pieters from Ant-
None of these three documents, therefore, has any werp (‘van een Vrou Claer Pieters in 1608 geschildert
bearing on the life of the painter Clara Peeters, and van Antwerpen’) supports this theory.26
all guesses at her year of birth are incorrect. The most My working method therefore consisted of inves-
recent biography wisely sticks to an estimate of some- tigating each and every Clara Peeters who might have
time between 1588 and 1590.24 lived in Antwerp during the painter’s active period
(1607–21). It soon became clear that there were many
returning to the sources more candidates than the three already known. By
The only reliable starting point for an investigation delving deeper into their lives, one by one, I hoped to
into the life of Clara Peeters is the city of Antwerp. The discover the true Clara (figs. 1a-1c).
Antwerp supports for her paintings in 1611 (one panel There were several women christened with the
made by local panel-maker Guilliam Aertssen, several name Clara Peeters, and the name also appears quite
1b
frequently in the marriage registers between 1608 and tigation began with all of the Claras who had married
1618; Clara was a popular Christian name in the cities. men with the surname Peeters.
However, none of these individuals appeared to have One of these was the wealthy Clara Loemans, wife
been a painter, and the names of their spouses (Josuwe of the clothier Everaert Peeters.28 She had been chris-
Vos, Bernaert Grau, Gielis Kempener, Jan Winters and tened in the Church of St Walburga on 17 August 1589
so on) gave no indication either. At first glance, this as the daughter of a second-hand clothes dealer and
appeared to be where my search ended, yet there was auctioneer. She appears as Clara Peeters in 1607.29 Her
something that others before me had missed. brother Artus Loemans was an art aficionado and mem-
It had always been assumed that Peeters was Clara’s ber of the Guild of Saint Luke. Another of her brothers,
surname. But, was this her maiden name? In Antwerp, cloak maker Hans Loemans, owned many paintings,
women were sometimes registered with their husband’s but none of these related to Clara Peeters.30
surnames, especially in the parish records. For example, I also located a Clara van Schelvergem, who had
Elisabeth de Jode, wife of Jan Brueghel the Elder, was married the cobbler Hans Peeters.31 She was a strong
recorded as Lisken Brueghels in the Antwerp parish woman who prevented her husband from selling their
records when she became godmother to her nephew home, the Sevilla, on the Meir in 1623. 32 When
Gerard Brueghel in 1599.27 Therefore, my second inves- their daughter Anna Peeters was christened in 1614,
20 boletín del museo del prado · tomo xxxiv · número 52 · 2016 · issn: 0210-8143
an entourage of painters
My hypothesis is that the painter Clara Peeters was 1c
Gielis Moreels
3 children
(1529)
Luke on 28 December 1580. He married Janneken Ste- 3.5-metre Adoration of the Magi in the Church of Saint
vens, sister of the renowned Prague court painter Peter Catherine in Mechelen.46
Stevens. Maurus is supposed to have spent some time If Clara Lamberts was Clara Peeters, the artists on
in Prague painting. Nicasius Lamberts was godfather her mother’s side of the family apparently had little
to one of their children and present at the christening infuence on her work.
in June 1588 at St Rumbold’s Cathedral in Mechelen.
Maurus I Moreels bought the ‘Gulden Helm’ house in clara’s immediate family
the Katelijnestraat in Mechelen in 1587, and died there In August 1587, Nicasius ‘Lambert’ and Clerken (Clara)
in 1631.43 ‘Morels’ had a child christened in the St Rumbold’s
His son Maurus II Moreels (born in around 1585), Cathedral in Mechelen. The child’s first name is no long-
Clara’s cousin, also stayed in Prague until 1616. He er legible.47 This could have been Clara Lamberts. Wit-
painted religious and historical tableaux. In 1628, nesses to the christening were the painter Guillame van
he received slightly more than 39 guilders for 99 can- Recht and Maeken van Oppen, who probably belonged
vas paintings that were shipped to Seville.44 They were to the van Ophem family of painters in Mechelen.
destined for the commercial house owned by Chrisos- Daughter Agneete Lamberts, who appears to have
tomus van Immerseel, who shipped them from Spain to been a few years older than Clara, married the landscape
the New World. Between 1628 and 1630, Maurus deliv- painter Laureys II vander Veken in Antwerp’s St James’
ered several other pieces, including a Last Judgement, a Church in February 1604. As a master’s son, Laureys
Battle of Pavia (‘eenen Slach van Pavien’) and more than II became the freemaster of the Antwerp Guild of
70 watercolour paintings, including 22 hermits and 9 Saint Luke in 1604. The couple lived in Mechelen for
hunting tableaux.45 His only preserved piece is a 4.8 by a while, but eventually returned to Antwerp in 1617.48
22 boletín del museo del prado · tomo xxxiv · número 52 · 2016 · issn: 0210-8143
Pieter II Stevens
(ca. 1567)
1616
Lysken Mannaerts
Frans Lamberts
(1596)
had provided him with a certificate of good behaviour.52
These were the painter Loys vanden Eenhne and the
1627 writer Joos de Prince.53 The two men stated that Nicasi-
Margriete Rombout Lamberti
vander Hagen (1597) us was of good moral character and that they had spent
time in Mechelen and Antwerp, eating, drinking and
1662 conversing with him.
jhr. Nicasius Lamberti jhr. Jan Baptista
(1628-1693) Lamberti (1630-1681) Nicasius took on several apprentices at his Antwerp
studio: Maximiliaen Gobbaert in 1594, an unnamed
jhr. Ignatius Lamberti
apprentice in 1604, Hans Vervoort in 1605, and Hans
(† 1681) Wichters in 1607. Nothing is known about the styles
in which they painted, but Clara certainly grew up in
their company.
After Agneete and Clara, another five children
They had several children, including Jan and Clara van- were born to Nicasius Lamberts and Clara Moreels
der Veken; the painter Maurus Moreels was godfather at in Antwerp. All were christened in St James’ Church.
the christening of the latter in 1617.49 Laureys II vander The spelling of the family name varies. The witnesses
Veken is known as the monogrammist LVDV. One of present at these christenings give us an idea of the fam-
his oil paintings of a landscape (‘Een Lantschapken van ily’s social circle.
Laureys vander Veken gemaect olieverve zonder lyste’)
wound up in an Antwerp collection in 1619,50 while one 14 December 1590
of his landscapes with the Good Samaritan (oil on cop- Thomas Lambert. Probably died young. Witnesses
per, 21 x 27 cm), is now in Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum. to the christening were Joris Hermans and Maria
Clara spent the first year or so of her life in Mechel- van Halmael.
en. However, in 1589 Nicasius Lamberts moved his
home and studio to Antwerp, somewhere in the St 27 July 1592
James parish. He is not registered as a property owner, Jacobus Lambrechs. Witnesses to the christening
so he most likely rented the house. His apprentices were Jaques vanden Wyer and Maria Stockarts. The
followed and went on to become masters in Antwerp: godfather came from Mechelen and was already
Roelant Yseweel in 1596 and Joris Paludanus in 1601. working as a painter in Antwerp in 1563. He was
Nicasius Lamberts became a freemaster of the Ant- also a merchant of paintings, a dean, master dean,
werp Guild of Saint Luke in 1589. At the same time, his alderman and treasurer for the Antwerp Guild of
name appears in the guild’s busboek as a member of the Saint Luke. Jacobus (Jacques) Lamberts never mar-
treasury for mutual assistance.51 He became a burgess ried and died in Antwerp on 1 December 1612. He
of the city on 2 June 1589. Three days prior, two men was buried in the Dominican Church in Antwerp.
10 February 1594 had two sons: Nicasius (born 1628) and Jan Baptista
Maria Lamberts. Witnesses to the christening Lamberti (born 1630).56
were Sixtus de Mens and Maria vanden Wouwer.
The godfather was an art collector. Upon his death There may also have been an older son, Jan. Indeed, there
in 1621, he left behind a banquet painting (‘een was a painter by the name of Jan Lambert(s) by whom a
schilderye Bancquet in vergulde lysten olieverwe’).54 single piece is known, an early Flemish sumptuous fruit
His daughter, Cornelia de Mens, was married to still life in the style of Osias Beert. The painting bears Jan
Pedro de San Juan, secretary to the Spanish king. Lambert’s signature and is dated 1613.57 If Clara Peeters
Maria Lamberts married Mertinus van Brabant in was indeed born Clara Lamberts, this artist takes on a
Antwerp’s St James’ Church on 1 December 1618.55 very significant meaning. The painting belonged to the
Witnesses at the wedding were her father Nicasius private collection of M. Van den Bossche in Brussels
Lamberts and Guillelmus van den Broecke, i.e. the before 1970, but all that remains today is a poor-quality
Mechelen painter Guilliam Paludanus, who settled black-and-white photograph (fig. 3).58 The table is heavily
in Haarlem. overcrowded and the execution is weaker than in Beert’s
paintings. A curtain rises up in the upper left corner,
3 March 1596 which can be found behind some of the laid tables in
Franscicus [sic] Lamberts. Probably died young. Beert’s work. In front of the curtain, we see a large pewter
Witnesses to the christening were Jacques Goij(en)s platter with green and red grapes. Expensive drinking ves-
and Franscinken Lambrechts. sels are set out in the back, from left to right: a cup screw
holding a rummer, a fluted glass, a stoneware jug and a
15 October 1597 nautilus cup. To the far right is a pewter platter with mul-
Rumoldus Lambrechts. Witnesses to the chris- berries, with a bowl of cherries in front of it.59 In the front,
tening were Cornelius Rombout and Tanneken we see a pewter platter with a bread roll, a knife with an
Goubecht. Rumoldus became a painter, taking ivory-and-gem-encrusted handle, a wanli porcelain bowl
on the name Rombout Lamberti. He first became filled with small wild strawberries, a small white butterfly,
freemaster of the Antwerp Guild of Saint Luke in sweetbrier, three purple-leaved filbert nuts (lambertsnoten
1633/34. He married Margriete vander Hagen, the — possibly a play on the artist’s own name?), half an or-
sister of nobleman Henrick vander Hagen, in Ant- ange, cherries, a china plate with walnuts, pears and other
werp’s St James’ Church on 11 January 1627. They fruits, a pomegranate, and half a pear.
24 boletín del museo del prado · tomo xxxiv · número 52 · 2016 · issn: 0210-8143
26 boletín del museo del prado · tomo xxxiv · número 52 · 2016 · issn: 0210-8143
August 1621, Henrick Peeters, painter, appeared before perhaps even Antwerp itself. In any case, this year was a
the aldermen of Antwerp, stating that he had trans- turning point for Clara Lamberts. Notably, 1621 is also
ferred the property rights to his home, den Patriarche the date on the last known painting by Clara Peeters –
Simeon, to Clara Moens.74 The fact that no sale price a Madonna with Child within a floral wreath (location
was paid is noteworthy. Clara Moens acquired the house unknown).
by taking over the mortgage on it, plus the arrears that We do know, however, that 1621 was not the year in
were still owing. This included an annual 48 guilders which Clara Lamberts died, as we see her appear again
and an equal amount to be paid to the Jan vander Biest in later documents.77 Perhaps the couple began to trav-
hospice in the Falconrui, Antwerp, which Moens prom- el. A Henrick Peeters and wife were registered in The
ised to meet.75 The 96 guilders that Henrick and Clara Hague in December 1622.78 They were not residents of
owed annually had obviously become too much. Had the city, and the man was employed as an art dealer. The
they lived in luxury but exhausted their finances? Clara Protestant legislators learned that Henrick had a num-
Peeters’s substantial and generally high-quality output ber of erotic paintings in his possession, depicting men
indicates that she must have been quite successful and and women in various sexual acts, which the legislators
in demand. But how lucrative was still-life painting? considered vile and scandalous, and to be rejected at
Her colleague, Osias Beert, died in 1623/24, leaving his all costs.79 Henrick was called before the president of
wife Magriete Ykens with six children and a mountain the Court of Holland by these prudish legislators (28
of debts. Five of their children were still alive in 1625 December 1622), at which point he apologised and said
and were on the brink of ruin.76 that the paintings had been painted in Prague and were
What happened to the house in the Israelietenstraat? to be shipped to Italy. He had not intended to display
Were Henrick and Clara Peeters-Lamberts able to live or sell them in The Hague, but this had come about
there as renters, perhaps in exchange for paintings? It when Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel
is doubtful, given their actual debt. Most likely, they (1599–1626), a general who fought against the Spanish
left their home and painting studio behind in 1621, and army in the Netherlands, had shown an interest in the
paintings, selecting thirteen of them for his own col- the godmother of her brother Rombout’s youngest son,
lection. The eleven remaining paintings were seized Johannes Baptista Lamberti, at his christening in the
by the magistrate, rolled up, folded together, bound cathedral. Her father, Nicasius Lamberts, died around
and then sealed with the Court’s seal, after which they 1633 (upon his death, the death dues were paid to the
were returned to Henrick Peeters’s wife (Clara?) due Guild of Saint Luke, in 1633/34); his wife died two years
to the indisposition or unwillingness of her husband, later.81 They were buried in their son’s tomb in Antwerp’s
in January 1623. Dominican Church. In 1637, a meagre posthumous fee
Whether this text concerns Clara and Henrick was owed to ‘Sieur Nicasius Lambrechts, painter’ by the
Peeters cannot be verified. However, it is known that heirs of the late lawyer Maximiliaen Martini.82
Clara Peeters gained fame as a painter in the northern
Netherlands. During her lifetime, a copy of one of her a last clue
fish still lifes – De Viskens naer Clara Pieters – was re- After the death of her parents, Clara herself was named
ported to be in the possession of Lucretia de Beauvois, in a notarised deed on 15 January 1636. Jouffrouwe
widow of the painter Herman II Saftleven († Rotter- Clara Lambrechts and her lawfully wedded husband
dam, 1627).80 This collection also included the Lambert Henrick Peeters transferred power of attorney for
banquet painting mentioned above. People obviously the inheritance from her late parents, master Nicasius
knew all too well that De Viskens was not an original Lambrechts and jouffrouwe Clara Moreels before no-
Clara Peeters, but rather a copy, which indicates the tary public Charles Caerdock (fig. 6).83 The preserved
popularity of her work. The copier could have been an copy of this deed shows that Henrick and Clara were
apprentice, or the less-talented painter Nicolas Cavé, residents of the city in which the notary public Caer-
who is known to have copied at least one of her paint- dock resided, which was Ghent. Clara was probably
ings. If Clara Peeters was in fact Clara Lamberts it forty-eight and her husband in his sixties at this point.
could also have been one of her painter relatives: her The Brabant painter had settled in Flanders.
brother Rombout Lamberts, her father Nicasius Lam- The couple gave power of attorney to notary public
berts, her husband Henrick Peeters... Her contacts in Loys vanden Berghe in Antwerp, who declared on 4
Mechelen, particularly her uncle and cousin Maurus I August 1637 that they had received a financial settle-
and II Moreels, could have contributed to the distribu- ment from her brother, master Rombout, and her sister
tion of her work. Maria Lambrechts, and stated that they were satisfied
Clara Lamberts appears in the parish records in with this settlement (‘daer mede sy hen hielden voor
Antwerp again on 1 April 1630, when she is named as wel content ende te vreden’). By this arrangement,
28 boletín del museo del prado · tomo xxxiv · número 52 · 2016 · issn: 0210-8143
a b s t r ac t : This article is the first to shed light on the life of Antwerp painter Clara Peeters. Analysis of the existing literature and
studies of untapped archival pieces led to the discovery that Clara Peeters could be one Clara Lamberts, born into the third generation
of a family of painters in Mechelen around 1587, and later becoming the wife of the painter Henrick II Peeters. The author has found
possible evidence that her studio may have been in Antwerp, where she painted the majority of her works. Clara Peeters-Lamberts
most likely died in Ghent sometime after 1636.
k ey wo rd s : Clara Peeters; still-life; Lamberts; archival research; Antwerp; Prado
1. Antwerp, 16 June to 2 October 145r–v (2 August 1642). Notary public hellicht vanden huyse genaempt Se- 1604). Geldwezen (Finance), IV, Belas-
2016; Madrid, 25 October 2016 to 19 Gillis Hally, SAA, SR 672, 220v–221r villa gestaen ende gelegen opde Meire tingen op de huizen (Property Taxes),
February 2017. The curator of the ex- (5 August 1642). alhier als haren man heeft vercocht aen Series III, no. 1, 37r (1578).
hibition was Alejandro Vergara. 21. Stadsarchief Gent, Staten van Mr. Gillis Haccart.’ 42. SAM, Beleyden en Uytwinningen,
2. 9 March to 25 June 2017. Goed (Records of Goods), 153 (28 33. Cathedral of Our Lady in Ant- reg. 9, 33r, 55r; and Archive of the Ka-
3. Vergara 2016. January 1647). werp, 31 March 1614. The name Cla- pittel of St Rombout.
4. Kramm 1857–64. 22. SAA, SR 674, 29v–31r (17 April ra Ykens could be referring to her 43. SAM, SR 210, 122r–v (27 June
5. Hymans 1894, p. 192, and Hy- 1642). mother, Clara van Oost, widow of 1587) and SR 212, 103r (12 April 1590).
mans 1901, pp. 852–53. 23. ‘Clara Peeters hunne dochtere Franchoys Ykens. 44. Denucé 1934, p. 59.
6. Van den Branden 1883, p. 1050. met mr. Henrick Joosten haeren wet- 34. Stadsarchief Mechelen (SAM; 45. Denucé 1934, pp. 58–59, 64–65
7. Stadsarchief Antwerpen (SAA), tigen man ende momboir.’ Mechelen City Archives), Series I, and 68.
notes Frans Jozef Van den Branden. 24. Vergara 2016, pp. 13–47. no. 32, 14–15. 46. Neeffs 1873.
8. SAA, letter addressed to Frans 25. SAA, V 378 (26 September 1611) 35. SAM, Weeskamer (Board of 47. The certificate is only known
Jozef Van den Branden, dated 27 March as frame-maker Lambrecht Versteens- Orphanages), 5, 14v (24 March 1550): by a later transcription. The parish
1902. sen. He became freemaster in 1608. ‘vanden drye kinderen Peeter Lamberts records were heavily damaged.
9. Noord-Hollands Archief (Haar 26. SA Amsterdam, N 5075 (notary daer moeder aff was wylen Katharina 48. SAM, notary public Jan Har-
lem), notary public Barent Jans De- public Palm Mathijsz), 483, 563r–565v. Verhaghen [...] de vader is een scilder.’ linghen, 902, 571r.
teringh, no. 185, 19 February 1643: Text written by one of the assessors, 36. SAA, Cert. 35, 148 (9 December 49. Christening in Antwerp’s St
inventory of Bartholomeus van Gennip. probably the painter David Colijn 1573). Marriage in Mechelen (St John’s James’ Church on 31 December 1617.
10. Van der Willigen and Meijer or Dirck Pietersz. Bontepaerdt (not Church), 25 June 1564. The painter Maurus ‘Moriels’ was re-
2003, p. 159. The same conclusion was Bonefaert, as in Decoteau 1992, p. 8). 37. SAM, Geldwezen (Finance), presented by Rombout Lambrechts;
published almost simultaneously in Maybe before 1620. See Meijer 2017, IV, Belastingen op de huizen (Property the godmother was Clara ‘Moriels’.
Meijer 2003, p. 260. pp. 40, 194–95. The transcription on Taxes), Series III, no. 3, 37v (1578). This 50. Duverger 1985, p. 66: inventory
11. Stadsarchief Amsterdam (SA) p. 195 – geschildert tot – is not correct probably concerns the younger Peeter of the deceased Maria van de Putte.
N 5075, Notariaat (Public Notary’s and should be read as geschildert van. Lambeerts, who married Anneken 51. Koninklijke Academie voor
Office), 278, 330r–v, 331v (19 May 1617). 27. This habit was common but Mannaerts in 1575/76 (SAM, Weeska- Schone Kunsten van Antwerpen, Bus-
12. SAA, Alderman’s records (SR), does not occur in the public notary mer [Board of Orphanages], 9, 81v, 7 boek, pp. 30r (incorrectly added to 1585
416, 205r–v (24 January 1595). archives or the aldermen’s records. May 1576). by Abraham Grapheus) and 32v (period
13. Greindl 1956, p. 37. 28. SAA, SR 506, 210v–211v (20 38. SAM, Series I no. 32, 14–15, 31: from 15 July 1589 to 15 July 1590).
14. Hibbs Decoteau 1992. November 1613), SR 509, 76r–v (3 April ‘is tAntwerpen gaen woonen; woont 52. SAA, Cert. 50, 155r (30 May 1589).
15. Verzameling der Graf-…, 1865, 1614). tAntwerpen en heeft daer vryhydt 53. The painter is listed as Lowys
p. 356. 29. At the christening of Clara Be- aengenomen.’ vander Eenhen in the 1589 records for
16. Bakx et al. 2012, p. 166. rrewijns in Antwerp Cathedral of Our 39. SAM, Archief van het Schilders the Antwerp Guild of Saint Luke.
17. SAA, SR 509, 340r–341r (4 June Lady, 6 May 1607. ambacht (Archive of Painters), nos. 3, 54. Duverger 1985, pp. 200–1.
1614) and SR 522, 13r–16r, 107r–108r (22 30. Duverger 1987, pp. 391–92. 22 and 34. 55. SAA, SR 555, 449r–450r (4 No-
and 30 January 1616). 31. SAA, SR 555, 473v–474r (14 De- 40. Duverger 1985, p. 256: ‘Twee vember 1622) mentions a Marten van
18. SAA, SR 549, 414v (8 October cember 1622). smalle systucxkens voor de schouwe: Brabant as Anna Tirtz’s widower. Is
1621). 32. SAA, PK 718, 207r–v (7 April een met Vogelkens van Joris Palludaen.’ this the same person? On 8 August
19. SAA, 7#10909 (1621–22). 1623) and PK 719, 2v (5 May 1623). Re- See also Van der Willigen and Meijer 1623, he acquired a rentcharge in the
20. Rijksarchief te Gent (RAG; Sta- cords of Requests (Rekwestboeken): ‘hoe 2003, p. 157. city of Mechelen (SAA, SR 559, 115v).
te Archive of Ghent), Oud Notariaat dat zy zuppliante met gout ende silver 41. SAM, Series I, no. 32, 189r: Gie- 56. Grandfather Nicasius Lamberts
(former public notary’s office), 684, heeft gecalengiert den coop vande lis Moreels audt LXXIIII Jaren (January was named godfather at Nicasius’s
30 boletín del museo del prado · tomo xxxiv · número 52 · 2016 · issn: 0210-8143