SQL (Structured Query Language)
SQL (Structured Query Language)
Paradigm Declarative
Raymond F. Boyce
Developer ISO/IEC
OS Cross-platform
Website www.iso.org/standard/63555.html
Major implementations
Many
Dialects
SQL-86
SQL-89
SQL-92
SQL:1999
SQL:2003
SQL:2006
SQL:2008
SQL:2011
SQL:2016
Influenced by
Datalog
Influenced
CQL, LINQ, SPARQL, SOQL, PowerShell,[1] JPQL, jOOQ, N1QL
Developed by ISO/IEC
Website www.iso.org/standard/63555.html
Contents
1History
2Syntax
3Procedural extensions
o 4.3Standardization history
o 4.4Current standard
5Alternatives
7Criticisms
o 7.1Design
o 7.2Other criticisms
o 8.2Constructed types
9See also
10Notes
11References
12Sources
o 12.1SQL standards documents
13External links
History[edit]
SQL was initially developed at IBM by Donald D. Chamberlin and Raymond F. Boyce after
learning about the relational model from Edgar F. Codd[12] in the early 1970s.[13] This version,
initially called SEQUEL (Structured English Query Language), was designed to manipulate and
retrieve data stored in IBM's original quasirelational database management system, System R,
which a group at IBM San Jose Research Laboratory had developed during the 1970s.[13]
Chamberlin and Boyce's first attempt at a relational database language was Square, but it was
difficult to use due to subscript notation. After moving to the San Jose Research Laboratory in
1973, they began work on SEQUEL.[12] The acronym SEQUEL was later changed to SQL because
"SEQUEL" was a trademark of the UK-based Hawker Siddeley Dynamics Engineering Limited
company.[14]
After testing SQL at customer test sites to determine the usefulness and practicality of the
system, IBM began developing commercial products based on their System R prototype,
including System/38, SQL/DS, and DB2, which were commercially available in 1979, 1981, and
1983, respectively.[15]
In the late 1970s, Relational Software, Inc. (now Oracle Corporation) saw the potential of the
concepts described by Codd, Chamberlin, and Boyce, and developed their own SQL-
based RDBMS with aspirations of selling it to the U.S. Navy, Central Intelligence Agency, and
other U.S. government agencies. In June 1979, Relational Software introduced the first
commercially available implementation of SQL, Oracle V2 (Version2) for VAX computers.
By 1986, ANSI and ISO standard groups officially adopted the standard "Database Language
SQL" language definition. New versions of the standard were published in 1989, 1992, 1996,
1999, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2011, [12] and most recently, 2016.[16]
Syntax[edit]
Main article: SQL syntax
A chart showing several of the SQL language elements that compose a single statement
Clauses, which are constituent components of statements and queries. (In some
cases, these are optional.) [17]
Expressions, which can produce either scalar values, or tables consisting
of columns and rows of data
Predicates, which specify conditions that can be evaluated to SQL three-valued logic
(3VL) (true/false/unknown) or Boolean truth values and are used to limit the effects of
statements and queries, or to change program flow.
Queries, which retrieve the data based on specific criteria. This is an important
element of SQL.
Statements, which may have a persistent effect on schemata and data, or may
control transactions, program flow, connections, sessions, or diagnostics.
o SQL statements also include the semicolon (";") statement terminator.
Though not required on every platform, it is defined as a standard part of
the SQL grammar.
Insignificant whitespace is generally ignored in SQL statements and queries, making
it easier to format SQL code for readability.
Procedural extensions[edit]
SQL is designed for a specific purpose: to query data contained in a relational database. SQL is
a set-based, declarative programming language, not an imperative programming
language like C or BASIC. However, extensions to Standard SQL add procedural programming
language functionality, such as control-of-flow constructs. These include:
Source Abbreviation Full name
ANSI/ISO
SQL/PSM SQL/Persistent Stored Modules
Standard
In addition to the standard SQL/PSM extensions and proprietary SQL extensions, procedural
and object-oriented programmability is available on many SQL platforms via DBMS integration
with other languages. The SQL standard defines SQL/JRT extensions (SQL Routines and Types
for the Java Programming Language) to support Java code in SQL databases. Microsoft SQL
Server 2005 uses the SQLCLR (SQL Server Common Language Runtime) to host
managed .NET assemblies in the database, while prior versions of SQL Server were restricted to
unmanaged extended stored procedures primarily written in C. PostgreSQL lets users write
functions in a wide variety of languages—including Perl, Python, Tcl, JavaScript (PL/V8) and C.[21]
The complexity and size of the SQL standard means that most implementers do not
support the entire standard.
The standard does not specify database behavior in several important areas
(e.g. indices, file storage...), leaving implementations to decide how to behave.
The SQL standard precisely specifies the syntax that a conforming database system
must implement. However, the standard's specification of the semantics of language
constructs is less well-defined, leading to ambiguity.
Many database vendors have large existing customer bases; where the newer
version of the SQL standard conflicts with the prior behavior of the vendor's database,
the vendor may be unwilling to break backward compatibility.
Little commercial incentive exists for vendors to make changing database suppliers
easier (see vendor lock-in).
Users evaluating database software tend to place other factors such as performance
higher in their priorities than standards conformance.
Standardization history[edit]
SQL was adopted as a standard by the ANSI in 1986 as SQL-86 [29] and the ISO in 1987.[11] It is
maintained by ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology, Subcommittee SC 32, Data management
and interchange.
Until 1996, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) data-management
standards program certified SQL DBMS compliance with the SQL standard. Vendors now self-
certify the compliance of their products.[30]
The original standard declared that the official pronunciation for "SQL" was an initialism: /ˌɛsˌkjuː
ˈɛl/ ("ess cue el").[9] Regardless, many English-speaking database professionals (including Donald
Chamberlin himself[31]) use the acronym-like pronunciation of /ˈsiːkwəl/ ("sequel"),[32] mirroring the
language's prerelease development name, "SEQUEL". [13][14][31]
The SQL standard has gone through a number of revisions:
2006 SQL:2006 ISO/IEC 9075-14:2006 defines ways that SQL can be used with
XML. It defines ways of importing and storing XML data in an
SQL database, manipulating it within the database, and
publishing both XML and conventional SQL-data in XML form. In
addition, it lets applications integrate queries into their SQL code
with XQuery, the XML Query Language published by the World
Wide Web Consortium (W3C), to concurrently access ordinary
SQL-data and XML documents.[33]
Current standard[edit]
The standard is commonly denoted by the pattern: ISO/IEC 9075-n:yyyy Part n: title, or, as a
shortcut, ISO/IEC 9075.
ISO/IEC 9075 is complemented by ISO/IEC 13249: SQL Multimedia and Application
Packages (SQL/MM), which defines SQL-based interfaces and packages to widely spread
applications such as video, audio, and spatial data. Interested parties may purchase SQL
standards documents from ISO,[37] IEC or ANSI. A draft of SQL:2008 is freely available as
a zip archive.[38]
Anatomy of SQL Standard[edit]
The SQL standard is divided into 10 parts, but with gaps in the numbering due to the withdrawal
of outdated parts.
ISO/IEC 9075-13:2016 Part 13: SQL Routines and types using the Java TM programming
language (SQL/JRT). It specifies the ability to invoke static Java methods as routines from
within SQL applications ('Java-in-the-database'). It also calls for the ability to use Java classes
as SQL structured user-defined types. This part of the standard consists solely
of optional features.
Technical reports[edit]
ISO/IEC 9075 is also accompanied by a series of Technical Reports, published as ISO/IEC TR
19075. These Technical Reports explain the justification for and usage of some features of SQL,
giving examples where appropriate. The Technical Reports are non-normative; if there is any
discrepancy from 9075, the text in 9075 holds. Currently available 19075 Technical Reports are:
ISO/IEC TR 19075-4:2015 Part 4: SQL with Routines and types using the Java programming
language
ISO/IEC TR 19075-6:2017 Part 6: SQL support for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)
ISO/IEC TR 19