A Review Paper On Effect of Urban Sprawl On The Development of Emerging Smart City
A Review Paper On Effect of Urban Sprawl On The Development of Emerging Smart City
A Review Paper On Effect of Urban Sprawl On The Development of Emerging Smart City
org (ISSN-2349-5162)
Abstract: Aristotle once wrote that men come together in cities to live, but stay with them to live the good life. But
now “cities are junctions in the flows of people, information, finance & freight. They are less and less places where
people live and work” (Ellis and Harris, 2004). The historic definition was changed due to excessive metropolitan
decentralization or suburbanization. Urban Sprawl occurs over time when a larger percentage of metropolitan areas
for residential and/or business activity starts evolving outside of its dominant locations. Sprawl can be stated as a
matter of degree not an absolute form. Sprawl has become an umbrella term. Its definition changes according to
countries and situations. As the population increases the density of the main city area increases, resulting in the
migration of people towards the city’s periphery areas. Thus, resulting in extension of unplanned, undesired and
uncontrolled growth of the cities. The major consequences of urban sprawl are, reduced open spaces, loss or rural
character and culture, increase in air and water pollution, increase in travel time or Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT),
also resources losses increased and urban decay. Many attempts have been made to reduce he extent of Urban sprawl.
Many different models and techniques are being developed for the same. A brown field development, improving mass
transit, smart growth, Galactic city model, CBD improvement etc. are some of the examples.
Smart city models are being designed by authorities to sustainable develop city so that reduction of pollution, efficient
transportation, promote mixed land use, more and more green infrastructures development. The paper is the review of
different literatures studied to analyse the term urban sprawl and smart growth.
I. INTRODUCTION
The three basic necessities of humans are mainly Food, Clothing & Shelter. However, clothing is considered less
important than the others. Food and shelter have created major problems in the last 100 years due to excessive
consumption of resources to rapid increase in population. Major consequences are security of housing, large scale
rural to urban migration, lack of resources, traffic congestion in the core city areas, increase in travel time, increase in
pollution etc. Many efforts are being made to overcome the problems, both at mass and individual level.
In ancient time the population grew around the banks of the river. This provided ease of transportation for humans and
goods. Now cluster of people is formed where employment is generated and also in order to increase the standard of
living. Development has led to considerable change in historical, social & political conditions. Small settlements
slowly go through various stages and eventually evolve into city or town.
II. URBANIZATION
Urbanization is an umbrella term, there is no universally accepted definition to describe it. Generally, it may be
defined as moment to people from rural to urban settlement. Different countries have different criteria for defining
urban settlement. They can be differentiated on the basis of demographic features and available infrastructure. In
India, according to 1961 Census it defines urban centres as “Places having a minimum population of 5000 with at
least 75 percent of male workers being engaged in non-agricultural activities and the density of population should be
400 persons per square Kilometres”.
According to Trewartha, the level of urbanization can is described as the proportion of urban population to total
population residing in urban places by shifting population from village to city and the process of transformation of
villages into city is called urbanization. Urbanization leads to growth of a country’s towns and cities due to social,
economic and natural progress.
JETIR1904E69 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 437
© 2019 JETIR April 2019, Volume 6, Issue 4 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
Major transformations, socio-psychological change affecting both people and places due to urbanization are:
1. A gradual concentration of people and events in towns and cities, increasing the general measure of settlement
2. An amendment in the economy of a country or region, whereby non-agricultural activities become prevailing
3. A change in the “structural” properties of population (Lower birth rates, higher death rates, positive migration
balances etc.
4. A change in the social, psychological and behavioural patterns of the people overtime to implement an ‘Urban
Way’ of life i.e. Urbanism as the way of life and the degree of urbanism past the built-up areas of towns and cities,
thereby inducing rural dilution
5. The transmission or circulation of change (Economic, social and technological) down the urban order and into rural
areas, urbanization does not always take the same system, nor does its progress at the same rates everywhere.
Urbanization is often regarded as a complex process. It points society towards the industrial and technological
augmentation. The understanding of the growth dynamics of urban settlements at different levels becomes the basic
requirement for any explanation of emerging pattern. These trends may lead to Urban Sprawl.
India can be termed as an agricultural biased economy. Since medieval times has rested its economy over agriculture.
Due to its geographical location and favourable climate for variety of different crops can be cultivated throughout
India. As industrialization started due to arrival of East India Company around 17th century towns and cities started to
develop near industries and according to type of industries cities started to emerge. Rural population started to migrate
to these towns and cities for better opportunities. Post-independence Indian economy was very weak so newly elected
government started developing basic infrastructure. Many new industries started to emerge, towns and cities started to
expand. However, majority of population stayed in villages. In 1900’s when economic barriers were removed, many
MNCs started to invest in India. Huge industries were set up as result. This increased the demand of labour and skilled
technicians. A large rural population started migrating towards urban areas. The major trends in migration along with
future projections are:
• In the year 1951, 5 cities had population over 1 million, in 2011 it increased to 53 and it is estimated that by 2031 it
will be around 70.
• Similarly, 3 cities were having more than 10 million population in 2011, estimated that by 2031 10 cities will cross
10 million.
• By 2031 urban population will be 610 million which will be 40% of total population.
The term was first coined by Earle Draper in 1937 who was a city planner. Sprawl may be a relatively new term for
India but in other developed countries like United Sates of America where industrial revolution took place way before
other countries. Here it was observed that people in search of employment moved towards core city areas. However,
as population increased people in need for security, ease of mobility, less populated lands started moving towards the
outer periphery of the city. So, the boundaries of the cities grew horizontally.
Sprawl is not an absolute form rather it can be stated as a degree or relative term. Basic problems occurring due to
change in spatial dynamics are:
The decline of central core cities which are historical origins of growth.
Cities have a core where all the zones like residential, commercial and public coexist. Due to over burden on
these cores the populations start to move towards outer boundaries. So new semi clusters are formed which
work independent so the value of core also decreases with time.
The emergence of edge cities which both complete and complement the functions of core. So, when life starts to grow
around the edges it needs to sustain itself so basic infrastructure starts developing around it. As daily travelling to core
will result in wastage of time and money.
In order to understand the phenomenon of Urban Sprawl, various literature studies have been undertaken. In majority
of the cases, urban sprawl is regarded as one of the major effects of urban growth. As a land-use phenomenon, it is
typically characterized in following ways in different literatures:
JETIR1904E69 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 438
© 2019 JETIR April 2019, Volume 6, Issue 4 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
The study of urban sprawl (The Regionalist, 1997; Sierra Club, 1998) was attempted in the developed countries and
recently in developing countries such as China (Yeh and Li, 2001; Cheng and Masser, 2003) and India (Jothimani,
1997 and Lata et al., 2001). Through satellite data urban sprawl over different time periods can be analytically
mapped, monitored and accurately assessed from satellite data along with straight ground data. The physical patterns
of sprawl on landscapes can be detected, mapped and analysed using remote sensing and geographical information
system (GIS) technologies. The patterns of sprawl are being described using a variety of forms, through visual
interpretation techniques, all with the aid of software and other application programs. The scientists are using
techniques of statistical software to characterize urbanizing landscapes over time and to calculate spatial indices that
measure dimensions such as contagion, the patchiness of landscapes, fractal dimension, and patch shape complexity.
The built-up is generally considered as the parameter of quantifying urban sprawl.
Some major consequences of urban sprawl in order to understand the extent of issue can be summarized as follows:
• Loss of open space
• Increased cost of infrastructure
• Loss of rural character
• Loss of farms and forestland
• Air pollution
• Water pollution
• Increased time in traffic/increased vehicle miles travelled (VMT)
• Increased energy consumption
• Loss of urban population to non-urban areas
• Urban decay
• Increases in housing starts and building permits
• Housing location trends in once rural areas
Those who criticize sprawl, in general, dream about densely populated urban communities with plenty of green
spaces, sharp distinctions between city and countryside, few cars, and lots of public transportation. In spite of the fact
that the patterns of sprawl in developed and developing countries are very different, the solutions proposed are similar
with a little bit of changes and modification to fit into the developing world since there are more important needs to be
solved. For developing countries, the people living on the edge of the city are mainly rural migrants who come to the
city in search of employment. In rural areas, where agriculture is most common, the activity often tends to be seasonal
and therefore unreliable. The problem that needs to be addressed is, the creation of employment opportunities away
from the major metropolitan areas. Industrial corridors along the major highway can drive the population away from
the city. Number of small towns and cities that are closer to the vicinity could be developed as potential sources of
employment for rural people. This would reduce the overall burden on bigger cities and create an alternative source of
work, indirectly addressing the problems of both unemployment and urban sprawl.
Brownfield redevelopment or the reuse of existing land within the city and concentrating growth:
Abandoned building sites such as old schools, industrial land and parking space may be reused providing alternatives
to using virgin land outside of city limits. This attacks the problem of city sprawl encroaching on new land outside the
city. The problem is that in most cases there are zoning policies that do not permit such redevelopment. Policies
therefore have to be adjusted by providing incentives for developers to re-use land. Concentrating growth may be
achieved through a variety of methods such as moving the concentration of population back towards the city centre
JETIR1904E69 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 439
© 2019 JETIR April 2019, Volume 6, Issue 4 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
and not pushing it outward, away from the core and by promoting the reuse of land within the cities. This is the same
as increasing density in already existing developments and building upwards rather than spreading horizontally.
Poor and unplanned mass transit system increases dependency on private transport. The auto mobile has led to the
sub-urbanization of the wealthy, but the solution on to this problem should be. Higher taxes on new cars, parking
charges can be used to discourage the use of private automobiles. Municipalities and authority can also act on the
problem by giving a lot of attention and providing the necessary funding for developing mass public transport modes.
Better transportation planning relies less on new highway construction - which encourages sprawl - and more on mass
transit solutions, such as light rail and commuter trains. In addition, awareness should be increased among people on
the benefits of using mass transport and through time make it a culture. Some European countries such as Stockholm
are good examples of mass transport culture.
Development and use of better and most efficient land use policies:
Communities can grow in an efficient way by consuming existing infrastructure, or by building away from natural
wildlife area and resources. For these development policies can be steered more towards an already urbanized area
In addition to the push factors, the pull factors that attract migrants to cities other than job opportunities need to be
addressed. Improving efficiency of land use or other proposed solutions would not be effective in the long run
Concentrating growth is what many planners recommend as a measure against sprawl for a sustainable city. The term
‘Smart Growth’ was coined to describe the response to the unchecked urban expansion in America during the past
half century. Taking the seriousness of the situation, Smart Growth idea was to suggest an alternative to the problem
of growth describing the application of sustainable development concept to land-use issues. The idea channels
development to areas with existing infrastructure and consumes less land for roads, houses and commercial buildings.
Smart Growth could mean smart management of resources in both growing and declining communities. The ultimate
goals of Smart Growth to counteract sprawl are not that different from general solutions forwarded by planners and
usually include following ten principles:
References
Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts, Paolo Neirottia, Alberto De Marco, September 2018
Towards a Simpler Characterization of Urban Sprawl across Urban Areas in Europe, Jean-Philippe, Ricardo Barranco, Carlo
Lavalle, March 2018
About Urban Sprawl: A Case Study of Ahmedabad City, Rahil M. Avadia, Prof. Ashok C. Patel, January 2018
Modelling Urban Sprawl Using Remotely Sensed Data: A Case Study of Chennai City, Tamilnadu, Rajchandar Padmanaban,
Avit K. Bhowmik, Pedro Cabral, February 2017
Urban sprawl and its impact on land use/land cover dynamics of Dehradun City, India Parvaiz A. Bhat, Mifta ul Shafiq, Abaas
A. Mir, Pervez Ahmed, December 2016
JETIR1904E69 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 440
© 2019 JETIR April 2019, Volume 6, Issue 4 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
URBAN GROWTH SCENARIOS OF A FUTURE MEGA CITY: CASE STUDY AHMEDABAD, Lehner, V. Kraus, K.
Steinnocher 2016
Trends Of Urbanization In India: Issues And Challenges In The 21st Century, Dr. Sadashivam, Dr. Shahla Tabassu, May 2016
Urban Sprawl and its Smart Management Mani Dhingra, April 2015
Urban Sprawl and its Impact on Urban Environment,Priyanka Dubey, Mr. Dilip Kumar, November 2013
Land use and land cover change detection and urban sprawl analysis of Vijayawada city using multi-temporal Landsat data
Sundarakumar Kusuma, January 2012
Surpass of urban sprawl in India – process, progress and perspectives, Dr.S.V. Srinivasa Sastry, September 2012
Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions, Taewoo Nam, Theresa A. Pardo 2011
Urban Sprawl, Smart Growth, and Deliberative Democracy David B. Resnik, October 2010
Urban Sprawl Management: Need for an Integrated Spatial Planning Support System, H. S. Sudhira, T. V. Ramachandra, M. H.
Bala Subrahmanya, 2010
Growth of Bangalore City since 1900 based on Maps and Satellite Imagery”, ISRO Technical Report No Bahera. G, 2010
Smart Growth and Beyond: Transitioning to a Sustainable Society Timothy Beatley, Richard Collins, May 2009
City Growth with urban Sprawl and Problems of Management, Golam Rahman Deanna Alam, Sirajul Islam, 2008
A Study of Urban Sprawl and utility planning of Pune city with the help of Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques, Bhailume S.
A., Nagarale V. R., 2008
An Application of SMCDA model in urban services: A case study of Ahvaz City., Gharakholu M., 2007
A Simple Theory of Smart Growth and Sprawl, Matthew A. Turner, January 2006
Information technology and urban form: challenges to smart growth IVONNE, AUDIRAC, April 2005
A GIS Assessment of Urban Sprawl in Richmond, Virginia, Almeda B, 2005
What Is “Smart Growth?”—Really, Lin Ye, Sumedha Mandpe, Peter B. Meyer, February 2005
Urban sprawl, Thomas, J. Nechyba, Randall P. Walsh, October 2004
Unearthing the roots of urban sprawl: a critical analysis of form, function and methodology, Nancy chin, March 2002
Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Peter Gordon, Harry richarson, 1997
The costs of sprawl: environmental and economic costs of Alternative residential development patterns at the urban fringe,
April 1974.
Climate disaster resilience: focus on coastal urban cities in ASIA, RAJIB SHAW And IEDM Team, June 2009.
Surat Urban Development Authority DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2035
JETIR1904E69 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 441