Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 510 views

    Procedure: Measurement System Analysis Execution

    Uploaded by

    aslam
    This document establishes guidelines for monitoring supplier performance and the process for determining the quality of procured raw materials and consumables. It involves rating existing suppliers based on quality and delivery over the last six months, with scores between 90-100% considered excellent and 65-79% requiring time-bound improvement plans. If a supplier scores below 65% their approval will be withdrawn, and scores between 65-70% will trigger an audit and corrective action plan submission. Records of data analysis and corrective actions taken are maintained.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Procedure: Measurement System Analysis Execution

    Uploaded by

    aslam
    510 views1 page
    This document establishes guidelines for monitoring supplier performance and the process for determining the quality of procured raw materials and consumables. It involves rating existing suppliers based on quality and delivery over the last six months, with scores between 90-100% considered excellent and 65-79% requiring time-bound improvement plans. If a supplier scores below 65% their approval will be withdrawn, and scores between 65-70% will trigger an audit and corrective action plan submission. Records of data analysis and corrective actions taken are maintained.

    Original Description:

    msa procedure

    Original Title

    MSA procedure

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document establishes guidelines for monitoring supplier performance and the process for determining the quality of procured raw materials and consumables. It involves rating existing suppliers based on quality and delivery over the last six months, with scores between 90-100% considered excellent and 65-79% requiring time-bound improvement plans. If a supplier scores below 65% their approval will be withdrawn, and scores between 65-70% will trigger an audit and corrective action plan submission. Records of data analysis and corrective actions taken are maintained.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    510 views1 page

    Procedure: Measurement System Analysis Execution

    Uploaded by

    aslam
    This document establishes guidelines for monitoring supplier performance and the process for determining the quality of procured raw materials and consumables. It involves rating existing suppliers based on quality and delivery over the last six months, with scores between 90-100% considered excellent and 65-79% requiring time-bound improvement plans. If a supplier scores below 65% their approval will be withdrawn, and scores between 65-70% will trigger an audit and corrective action plan submission. Records of data analysis and corrective actions taken are maintained.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Sub - Section No 8

    PROCEDURE Ref. IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.3/4


    Doc No F/MGT/05/02
    Revision No OE
    Measurement System Analysis Execution Revision Date 10.09.20
    Page No 1 OF 1

    1.0 Purpose : It is to establish guidelines to determine the process of monitoring of performance of supplier
    It applies to the determination of the quality of procured Raw material & consumables needed for
    2.0 Scope : production casting impact on quality of finished product.

    3.0 Reference : AS PER IATF 16949 STANDARD


    4.0 Resources : IATF Manual
    5.0 Responsibility : Procurement / QA / Technical Incharge
    : Activity Description
    The existing suppliers from whom the products are being purchased for the last six months are
    : enlisted as approved suppliers based on their ability to meet Quality & Delivery requirements.

    : The vendor performance is rated on basis of Quality and Delivery of the material sent by vendor.
    : If the vendor performance rates below 70% but greater then 65% , material is hold and vendor-audited is initiated.
    : If there is some OEM complaint reported then too vendor is audited followed by CAPA submission

    6.0 Method APPROVAL STATUS


    Rating SCORE
    Regular supplier New Supplier

    A 90 - 100 % Excellent .. Eligible for Self certification Un conditional approval

    Good Conditional approval - Restricted quantities.


    B 80 - 89 %
    Needs improvement plan Required improvement plan

    Requires major improvements Required major improvements / time bound

    C 65 - 79 % Time bound improvement plan required improvement plan required Approval only after

    Restricted procurement the re-audit and score improved to > 80 %.

    D < 65 % Withdrawl of the approval Rejected

    7.0 Corrective Action : The manufacturing process & system at vendor-end is validated and analysed to pin-point the root cause ;
    followed by submission of CAPA by vendor

    8.0 Records : Following records shall be maintained at specified location


    1- Data analysis

    2- List of Corrective actions taken

    REVISION HISTORY
    S.NO. REVISION NO REVISION DATE REVISION DETAILS PREPARED CHECKED BY APPROVED BY

    1 OE 10.09.20 IATF Requirements

    You might also like