Disciplinary Literacy A Shift That Makes Sense

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

ASCD Express Home Archives Upcoming Themes Write for Express Subscribe

Literacy in Every Classroom


February 23, 2017 | Volume 12 | Issue 12
Table of Contents
Share |

Disciplinary Literacy: A Shift That Makes Sense

ReLeah Lent

Becky Stewart, a high school physics teacher, had attended so many workshops on reading strategies
that she felt as if she could teach a session herself. She tried to do what was asked of her, utilizing K-
W-L charts and close reading strategies, but she jokingly told her friend that if one more person told
her that every teacher was a teacher of reading, she would quit her job and find work in a research
lab.

For years, disciplinary teachers have felt they were being asked to supplement their content with a
separate reading curriculum. "I'm not a reading teacher," Becky explained. "My degree is in science,
and I want to teach science. I really don't want a job where I am responsible for teaching kids how to
read and write."

Becky is not alone. Even English teachers point out that they, like other content-area teachers, have a
full curriculum that doesn't start or end with basic literacy skills. And beware of asking a math
teacher, whose very language is often represented in ways other than the alphabet, what she thinks
of the reading strategy movement. Elective or special area teachers, such as those who teach music
or the arts, are also often asked to include literacy strategies in their teaching, though their texts may
be in the form of props, canvas, clay, or sheets of music rather than a traditional book. Since a text is
really anything imbued with meaning (Draper, 2015), it doesn't make sense to require teachers who
rarely use print-centric materials to employ traditional reading methods to help students gain
understanding.

One of the problems with such a narrow definition of text is the "one-size-fits-all" reading strategy
movement, where generic strategies are often used as isolated activities completely unrelated to the
content. Some schools, for instance, implement "strategies of the week" in which all teachers must
use a common concept map or have a similar word wall related to their current unit of study. Such
an approach doesn't help students understand when and how a strategy might be used or adapted,
and it can actually undermine their ability to become independent and flexible learners.

Enter Disciplinary Literacy


Disciplinary literacy takes a turn away from isolated content-area strategies and clarifies what
teachers can do to help their students learn in a more effective way. It respects the varied ways that
students read, reason, write, think, speak, and, most important, participate in specific content areas.
Researcher Elizabeth Moje (2010) deepens the definition by arguing that disciplinary learning doesn't
just build knowledge but actually produces or constructs it. Let's consider the K-W-L mentioned
earlier. This strategy has been shown to be generally effective in helping students

Reflect on what they already know (What I know).

Set a purpose for reading (What I want to know).

Review what they have learned (What I have learned).


However, it would be much more useful if the strategy were customized to various content areas,
directing students to use their new knowledge. In other words, in a disciplinary literacy approach, the
K-W-L strategy becomes something different for each content area:

Observe-infer-conclude in science (Alvermann, Gillis, & Phelps, 2009)

Deconstruct-solve-apply in math

Analyze-compare/evaluate-infer in history

Summarize-evaluate/analyze-write in English

Listen-comprehend-speak in foreign language

Observe-analyze-express in art
Content-area writing is similarly specific to each discipline. For example, a well thought-out metaphor
may enhance a piece of writing in an English class but would hardly work for a written deconstruction
of a math problem or the concise, factual writing needed in science. Getting students to think about
content also requires targeted disciplinary skills. When a teacher asks students to think like a
historian, he means that they must learn how to intuitively source materials, read closely for
underlying bias, and engage in an analysis of the text or a comparison of one text to another. This
sort of thinking, although it shares some commonalities with other disciplines, helps students learn
how to specifically engage in the subject of history as opposed to, say, math or science. In short,
disciplinary literacy is about doing the work of the disciplines instead of merely reading about it.

Diving into Disciplinary Literacy

But how do busy teachers make the shift to a disciplinary literacy classroom? It requires an
embedded approach that honors the expertise of content-area teachers. First, they must identify
what students need to learn and do to become successful in their content areas, preferably through
dialogue with colleagues who teach the same content. Once they have named such skills and
behaviors, they should focus on how to teach these skills while teaching content—not as a sidebar to
the content. Admittedly, teachers may need to engage in a book or lesson study or even participate
in a professional development opportunity to learn how best to teach the identified skills, but
focusing on literacy skills within the disciplines brings to life a much richer schoolwide curriculum as
students learn how to use literacy for different purposes in various subject areas.

What Are Literacies Within the Disciplines?


The following lists for each of the major content areas, although not comprehensive, can act as
starting points through which communities of teachers can begin to think in terms of disciplinary
literacy (Lent, 2016). Click here to download the list as a shareable PDF.

Science

When scientists read, they

Ask "Why?" more than "What?"

Interpret data, charts, and illustrations

Seek to understand concepts as well as words

Determine validity of sources and quality of evidence

Pay attention to details


When scientists write, they

Use precise vocabulary

Compose in phrases, bullets, graphs or sketches

Use passive voice

Favor exactness over craft or elaboration

Communicate in a systematic form


When scientists think, they

Tap into curiosity to create questions

Rely on prior knowledge or research

Consider new hypotheses or evidence

Propose explanations

Create solutions
History or Social Science

When historians read, they

Interpret primary and secondary sources

Identify bias

Think sequentially

Compare and contrast events, accounts, documents and visuals

Determine meaning of words within context


When historians write, they

Create timelines with accompanying narratives


Synthesize information/evidence from multiple sources

Emphasize coherent organization of ideas

Grapple with multiple ideas and large quantities of information

Create essays based on argumentative principles


When historians think, they

Create narratives

Rely on valid primary and secondary sources to guide their thinking

Compare and contrast or ponder causes and effects

Consider big ideas or inquiries across long periods of time

Recognize bias
Math

When mathematicians read, they

Use information to piece together a solution

Look for patterns and relationships

Decipher symbols and abstract ideas

Ask questions

Apply mathematical reasoning


When Mathematicians write, they

Explain, justify, describe, estimate or analyze

Favor calculations over words

Use precise vocabulary

Include reasons and examples

Utilize real-word situations


When Mathematicians think, they

Consider patterns

Utilize previous understandings

Find connections

Estimate, generalize, and find exceptions

Employ mathematical principles


English

When students of English read, they


Understand how figurative language works

Find underlying messages that evolve as theme

Assume a skeptical stance

Pay attention to new vocabulary or words used in new ways

Summarize and synthesize


When students of English write, they

Engage in a process that includes drafting, revising, and editing

Use mentor texts to help them with the craft of writing

Pay attention to organization, details, elaboration and voice

Rely on the feedback of others

Avoid formulaic writing


When students of English think, they

Reflect on multiple texts

Ask questions of the author

Consider research or others ideas

Discuss ideas and themes

Argue both sides of a point


As teachers discuss the skills students need in their content area, they can expand these lists and
then determine the most effective instructional practices to help students practice and master such
skills—all while engaging in the authentic work of their disciplines.

Through disciplinary literacy, we can create readers and writers who come to use literacy for its
highest purpose—learning—with an expert by their side, a content area teacher who not only
understands the subject but also how to use literacy to unlock it.

References

Alvermann, D. E., Phelps, S. F., & Gillis, V. R. (2009). Content-area reading and literacy: Succeeding in
today's diverse classrooms. New York: Pearson.

Draper, R. J. (2015, March). Using the Common Core State Standards to support disciplinary literacies.
Voices from the Middle, 22(3), 59.

Lent, R. C. (2016). This is disciplinary literacy: Reading, writing, thinking, and doing … content area by
content area. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

Moje, E. B. (2010, April 6). Disciplinary literacy: Why it matters and what you should do about it. Retrieved
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Id4gK-wGzU
ReLeah Cosett Lent is an international literacy consultant and author of many books, including This Is
Disciplinary Literacy: Reading, Writing, Thinking, and Doing . . . Content Area by Content Area (2016,
Corwin) and Overcoming Textbook Fatigue: 21st Century Tools to Revitalize Teaching and Learning (ASCD,
2012).

ASCD Express, Vol. 12, No. 12. Copyright 2017 by ASCD. All rights reserved. Visit
www.ascd.org/ascdexpress.

You might also like