Disciplinary Literacy A Shift That Makes Sense
Disciplinary Literacy A Shift That Makes Sense
Disciplinary Literacy A Shift That Makes Sense
ReLeah Lent
Becky Stewart, a high school physics teacher, had attended so many workshops on reading strategies
that she felt as if she could teach a session herself. She tried to do what was asked of her, utilizing K-
W-L charts and close reading strategies, but she jokingly told her friend that if one more person told
her that every teacher was a teacher of reading, she would quit her job and find work in a research
lab.
For years, disciplinary teachers have felt they were being asked to supplement their content with a
separate reading curriculum. "I'm not a reading teacher," Becky explained. "My degree is in science,
and I want to teach science. I really don't want a job where I am responsible for teaching kids how to
read and write."
Becky is not alone. Even English teachers point out that they, like other content-area teachers, have a
full curriculum that doesn't start or end with basic literacy skills. And beware of asking a math
teacher, whose very language is often represented in ways other than the alphabet, what she thinks
of the reading strategy movement. Elective or special area teachers, such as those who teach music
or the arts, are also often asked to include literacy strategies in their teaching, though their texts may
be in the form of props, canvas, clay, or sheets of music rather than a traditional book. Since a text is
really anything imbued with meaning (Draper, 2015), it doesn't make sense to require teachers who
rarely use print-centric materials to employ traditional reading methods to help students gain
understanding.
One of the problems with such a narrow definition of text is the "one-size-fits-all" reading strategy
movement, where generic strategies are often used as isolated activities completely unrelated to the
content. Some schools, for instance, implement "strategies of the week" in which all teachers must
use a common concept map or have a similar word wall related to their current unit of study. Such
an approach doesn't help students understand when and how a strategy might be used or adapted,
and it can actually undermine their ability to become independent and flexible learners.
Deconstruct-solve-apply in math
Analyze-compare/evaluate-infer in history
Summarize-evaluate/analyze-write in English
Observe-analyze-express in art
Content-area writing is similarly specific to each discipline. For example, a well thought-out metaphor
may enhance a piece of writing in an English class but would hardly work for a written deconstruction
of a math problem or the concise, factual writing needed in science. Getting students to think about
content also requires targeted disciplinary skills. When a teacher asks students to think like a
historian, he means that they must learn how to intuitively source materials, read closely for
underlying bias, and engage in an analysis of the text or a comparison of one text to another. This
sort of thinking, although it shares some commonalities with other disciplines, helps students learn
how to specifically engage in the subject of history as opposed to, say, math or science. In short,
disciplinary literacy is about doing the work of the disciplines instead of merely reading about it.
But how do busy teachers make the shift to a disciplinary literacy classroom? It requires an
embedded approach that honors the expertise of content-area teachers. First, they must identify
what students need to learn and do to become successful in their content areas, preferably through
dialogue with colleagues who teach the same content. Once they have named such skills and
behaviors, they should focus on how to teach these skills while teaching content—not as a sidebar to
the content. Admittedly, teachers may need to engage in a book or lesson study or even participate
in a professional development opportunity to learn how best to teach the identified skills, but
focusing on literacy skills within the disciplines brings to life a much richer schoolwide curriculum as
students learn how to use literacy for different purposes in various subject areas.
Science
Propose explanations
Create solutions
History or Social Science
Identify bias
Think sequentially
Create narratives
Recognize bias
Math
Ask questions
Consider patterns
Find connections
Through disciplinary literacy, we can create readers and writers who come to use literacy for its
highest purpose—learning—with an expert by their side, a content area teacher who not only
understands the subject but also how to use literacy to unlock it.
References
Alvermann, D. E., Phelps, S. F., & Gillis, V. R. (2009). Content-area reading and literacy: Succeeding in
today's diverse classrooms. New York: Pearson.
Draper, R. J. (2015, March). Using the Common Core State Standards to support disciplinary literacies.
Voices from the Middle, 22(3), 59.
Lent, R. C. (2016). This is disciplinary literacy: Reading, writing, thinking, and doing … content area by
content area. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Moje, E. B. (2010, April 6). Disciplinary literacy: Why it matters and what you should do about it. Retrieved
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Id4gK-wGzU
ReLeah Cosett Lent is an international literacy consultant and author of many books, including This Is
Disciplinary Literacy: Reading, Writing, Thinking, and Doing . . . Content Area by Content Area (2016,
Corwin) and Overcoming Textbook Fatigue: 21st Century Tools to Revitalize Teaching and Learning (ASCD,
2012).
ASCD Express, Vol. 12, No. 12. Copyright 2017 by ASCD. All rights reserved. Visit
www.ascd.org/ascdexpress.