Topik 2 - Failure Modes of Composite Material

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 25

Failure Modes of Composite

Materials
Aircraft Materials and Manufacturing Methods II
(Material Pesawat dan Metoda Manufaktur II)

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC


Failure
Modes of
Composites
Material
Defects
Strength
Failure mechanisms
Outlines
Fractography
Fracture mechanics
Failure criteria
• Environmental degradation
• Impact damage
• Fatigue
• Cracks from local overload
In-Service • Debonding
Defects • Delamination
• Fiber fracturing
• Erosion
• strength = stress at failure
• failure may be
• yielding in metals
• non-recoverable loss of elastic
Strength response
• first-ply failure
• ultimate failure
• one material can have several
different strengths
• Kelly-Tyson equation for UD composites:
• σc = σfVf + σm*(1-Vf) at high Vf, or
• σc < σm#(1-Vf) at low Vf
• where σm* is the tensile stress in the
matrix
Strength at the failure strain of the fibre, and
• σm# is the maximum tensile strength
of the matrix

• For small mis-alignments:


• σc = σfVf / cos2θ = σfVfsec2θ
• matrix cracking
• fibre fracture
• debonding = interface failure
Failure • delamination = interlayer failure
• fibre pullout
mechanisms
• micro-buckling
• kink bands
• cone of fracture
• The key criterion for composite
failure is the local strain to failure: ε’
Failure a.k.a. elongation at break
and not stress
strain of
composites • Note that ε’ for the fibre/matrix
interface
i.e. transverse fibres = ~0.25 %
Matrix cracking max min
polyester resin ε’ = 0.9-4.0 %

vinyl ester ε’ = 1.0-4.0 %

epoxy resin ε’ = 1.0-3.5 %

phenolic resin ε’ = 0.5-1.0 %

data from NL Hancox, Fibre Composite Hybrid Materials,


Elsevier, 1981.
Fibre fracture
S/R-glass ε’ = 4.6-5.2 % ….

E-glass ε’ = 3.37 % ……….…

Kevlar 49 ε’ = 2.5 % ……………….

HS-carbon ε’ = 1.12 % …………………

UHM-carbon ε’ = 0.38 % …………………..


data from NL Hancox,
Fibre Composite Hybrid Materials, Elsevier, 1981.
Fibre-matrix debonding

a b
• Crack can run
• through (not shown), or
• around the fibre
• ~12000 carbon or 1600 glass UD fibres / 1 mm2
Fibre-matrix
debonding:
Fibre pullout Fibre
• as parts of fractured composite separate, fracture
fibres which have debonded
fail remotely from principal fracture plane.
• relaxed fibre expands radially
• energy absorbed by frictional forces
as fibre pulls from the opposite face
• debonding and pullout absorb high
energies and result in a tough material
• one layer is a lamina (plural = laminae)
• several layers in a composite is a
laminate
• separation of the layers is delamination
Delamination
of layers • to avoid delamination
• 3-D reinforcement (often woven or
stitched)
• Z-pinning
• debonding (fibre/matrix separation)
and delamination (layer separation)
both create internal defects
Stress which scatter light
• the consequence is that the laminate
whitening changes from transparent to opaque,
of GFRP referred to as “stress whitening”
• similar effects may be seen in other
composites (e.g. at stitches in NCF
CFRP)
Micro-buckling

In bending tests, failure occurs due to:


• stress concentration
at the loading roller
• and poor
fibre/matrix adhesion
• local microbuckling
Kink bands (HM
fibre composites)
• Compressive load causes buckling
followed by
co-operative failure of a group of
fibres to produce short lengths of
parallel mis-oriented fibre
• Image from
• http://coeweb.eng.ua.edu/
aem/people/samit/
nanoclay.htm
Cone of fracture (CFRP)
• the impacted face shows no sign of damage
• delamination occurs in a cone
• fibre spalling from the back face
• known as BVID
• barely visible impact damage
• difficult to detect unless reported
Ballistic impact
• energy absorbing mechanisms
• compression at projectile CSA
• compression beyond projectile CSA
• shear plugging
• tension of primary yarns
• tension of secondary yarns
• cone of fracture
• matrix cracking
• fibre fracture
• debonding
• delamination
• friction … after Akella and Naik, Composite armour – a review
J.Indian Inst. Sci, 2015, 95(3), 297-312.
Fractography
• use of optical or electron microscopes
to image the fracture surface:
Fracture mechanics
• stress intensity factor (Pa.m1/2 )
• fracture toughness
(critical stress intensity factor, Pa.m1/2 )
• separate parameters in each plane

• mode

JG Williams,
Fracture mechanics of composite failure, Proc IMechE Part C:
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1990, 204(4), 209-218.
Design to avoid failure
• beware first ply failure
dependent on laminate stacking sequence

• failure index (FI) of >1 = failure


dependent on the failure criteria selected
• reserve factor (RF) <1 = failure
for Tsai-Hill failure criteria, RF =1/√(FI)
Failure criteria
• failure occurs at critical value of
local uni- or bi-axial stress reaches :
• σi ≥ σi' or ij ≥ ij' (' indicates failure condition)
• criteria include
• von Mises yield criterion:
• critical distortional strain energy
• Tresca yield criterion:
• maximum shear stress
• Tsai-Hill criterion:
• an envelope in stress space
• … and many others,
• getting more complex/sophisticated
Failure criteria
• those above plus many other criteria
• no agreement !
(see MJ Hinton, AS Kaddour and PD Soden,
Failure criteria in fibre reinforced polymer composites: the world-
wide failure exercise,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004. ISBN 0-08-044475-x).
• Hashin’s early assumption:
• "It may be argued that in the event
that a failure plane can be identified,
[then] the failure is produced by the
normal and shear stresses on that plane"!
Summary of lecture
• strength
• failure mechanisms
• fractography
• fracture mechanics
• failure criteria

You might also like