Commissioner of Internal

Commissioner of Internal
Revenue vs Algue Inc., and Court of Tax Appeals

GR No. L-28896 February 17, 1988
Facts:
The Philippine Sugar Estate Development Company had earlier appointed Algue Inc., as its
agent, authorizing it to sell its land, factories and oil manufacturing process.As such,the
corporation worked for the formation of the Vegetable Oil Investment Corporation, until they
were able to purchased the PSEDC properties. For this sale, Algue Inc., received as agent
a commission of P126, 000.00, and it was from this commission that the P75, 000.00
promotional fees were paid to Alberto Guevara, Jr., Eduardo Guevara, Isabel Guevara,
Edith, O'Farell, and Pablo Sanchez.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue contends that the claimed deduction is not allowed
because it was not an ordinary reasonable or necessary business expense. The Court of
Tax Appeals had seen it differently. Agreeing with Algue Inc., it held that the said amount
had been legitimately paid by the private respondent for actual services rendered. The
payment was in the form of promotional fees.
Issue:
Whether or not the Collector of Internal Revenue correctly disallowed the P75, 000.00
deduction claimed by private respondent Algue Inc., as legitimate business expenses in its
income tax returns.
Ruling:
No, The Supreme Court agrees with the respondent court that the amount of the
promotional fees was not excessive. The P75,000.00 was 60% of the total commission.
This was a reasonable proportion, considering that it was the payees who did practically
everything, from the formation of the Vegetable Oil Investment Corporation to the actual
purchase by it of the Sugar Estate properties.
The claimed deduction by the private respondent was permitted under the Internal
Revenue Code and should therefore not have been disallowed by the petitioner.
CIR vs. Algue Inc.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Algue Inc.
GR No. L-28896 | Feb. 17, 1988
Facts:
 Algue Inc. is a domestic corp engaged in engineering, construction and other allied activities
 On Jan. 14, 1965, the corp received a letter from the CIR regarding its delinquency income taxes from 1958-1959,
amtg to P83,183.85
 A letter of protest or reconsideration was filed by Algue Inc on Jan 18
 On March 12, a warrant of distraint and levy was presented to Algue Inc. thru its counsel, Atty. Guevara, who
refused to receive it on the ground of the pending protest
 Since the protest was not found on the records, a file copy from the corp was produced and given to BIR Agent
Reyes, who deferred service of the warrant
 On April 7, Atty. Guevara was informed that the BIR was not taking any action on the protest and it was only then
that he accepted the warrant of distraint and levy earlier sought to be served
 On April 23, Algue filed a petition for review of the decision of the CIR with the Court of Tax Appeals
 CIR contentions:
- the claimed deduction of P75,000.00 was properly disallowed because it was not an ordinary reasonable or
necessary business expense
- payments are fictitious because most of the payees are members of the same family in control of Algue and that
there is not enough substantiation of such payments
 CTA: 75K had been legitimately paid by Algue Inc. for actual services rendered in the form of promotional fees.
These were collected by the Payees for their work in the creation of the Vegetable Oil Investment Corporation of
the Philippines and its subsequent purchase of the properties of the Philippine Sugar Estate Development
Company.
Issue: W/N the Collector of Internal Revenue correctly disallowed the P75,000.00 deduction claimed by Algue as
legitimate business expenses in its income tax returns
Ruling:
 Taxes are the lifeblood of the government and so should be collected without unnecessary hindrance, made in
accordance with law.
 RA 1125: the appeal may be made within thirty days after receipt of the decision or ruling challenged
 During the intervening period, the warrant was premature and could therefore not be served.
 Originally, CIR claimed that the 75K promotional fees to be personal holding company income, but later on
conformed to the decision of CTA
 There is no dispute that the payees duly reported their respective shares of the fees in their income tax returns
and paid the corresponding taxes thereon. CTA also found, after examining the evidence, that no distribution of
dividends was involved
 CIR suggests a tax dodge, an attempt to evade a legitimate assessment by involving an imaginary deduction
 Algue Inc. was a family corporation where strict business procedures were not applied and immediate issuance of
receipts was not required. at the end of the year, when the books were to be closed, each payee made an
accounting of all of the fees received by him or her, to make up the total of P75,000.00. This arrangement was
understandable in view of the close relationship among the persons in the family corporation
 The amount of the promotional fees was not excessive. The total commission paid by the Philippine Sugar Estate
Development Co. to Algue Inc. was P125K. After deducting the said fees, Algue still had a balance of P50,000.00 as
clear profit from the transaction. The amount of P75,000.00 was 60% of the total commission. This was a
reasonable proportion, considering that it was the payees who did practically everything, from the formation of
the Vegetable Oil Investment Corporation to the actual purchase by it of the Sugar Estate properties.
 Sec. 30 of the Tax Code: allowed deductions in the net income – Expenses - All the ordinary and necessary
expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, including a reasonable
allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered xxx
 the burden is on the taxpayer to prove the validity of the claimed deduction
 In this case, Algue Inc. has proved that the payment of the fees was necessary and reasonable in the light of the
efforts exerted by the payees in inducing investors and prominent businessmen to venture in an experimental
enterprise and involve themselves in a new business requiring millions of pesos.
 Taxes are what we pay for civilization society. Without taxes, the government would be paralyzed for lack of the
motive power to activate and operate it. Hence, despite the natural reluctance to surrender part of one's hard
earned income to the taxing authorities, every person who is able to must contribute his share in the running of
the government. The government for its part, is expected to respond in the form of tangible and intangible
benefits intended to improve the lives of the people and enhance their moral and material values
 Taxation must be exercised reasonably and in accordance with the prescribed procedure. If it is not, then the
taxpayer has a right to complain and the courts will then come to his succor
Algue Inc.’s appeal from the decision of the CIR was filed on time with the CTA in accordance with Rep. Act No. 1125. And we
also find that the claimed deduction by Algue Inc. was permitted under the Internal Revenue Code and should therefore not
have been disallowed by the CIR

Commissioner of Internal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Commissioner of Internal

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Commissioner of Internal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Commissioner of Internal

Revenue vs Algue Inc., and Court of Tax Appeals

You might also like