Educational Evaluation Lesson 3 - Cipp Model

EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION
LESSON 3 – CIPP Model
At the end of the lesson, the learners should be able to:
1. Explain the elements of the CIPP evaluation model; and

2. Elaborate how the CIPP model can be used in school setting.
INTRODUCTION
Conducting an evaluation of a school program, project, intervention,
curriculum or initiative requires specific and systematic procedures. Extensive
studies of experts have yielded quite a number of evaluation models. However,
in this lesson you shall only focus on the CIPP model developed by Phi Delta
Kappa chaired by Daniel Stufflebeam (1971).
The CIPP (context, input, process, and product) evaluation model claims
that evaluation is conducted to reach a well-founded decision. It does not assume
linear relationship among its components. This model can be used for both
formative and summative kinds of evaluation activity. By alternately focusing on
program context, inputs, process, and products, the CIPP model encompasses
all phases of an educational program: planning, implementation and evaluation.
The first three elements of the CIPP model are suitable for formative evaluation
while the fourth element is ideal for summative studies. The components of the
model are summarized in the model adapted from Stufflebeam (2003) below.
• Context • Input
Evaluation Evaluation
Goals Plans
Outcomes Actions
• Product • Process
Evaluation Evaluation
Context Evaluation
The context evaluation component of the model establishes the connection
between the program goals and evaluation. The evaluator describes the
environment and determines the needs of the program beneficiaries. The unmet
needs, problems, issues and challenges are identified and evaluated.
Input Evaluation
The input evaluation component of the model determines how resources
are utilized to achieve program objectives and goals. Data regarding the school’s
mission, goals, and plans are collected leading to the assessment of the
responsiveness of program strategies to the stakeholders’ needs. A comparison to
alternative strategies used in similar programs is also aimed in this stage. The
input evaluation complements the context evaluation.
Process Evaluation
The progress evaluation component of the model reviews the program
quality. It ascertains whether the program is implemented as it is planned.
Program activities are monitored, documented and assessed. Feedback
mechanisms and continuous quality improvement are of utmost concern by this
stage.
Product Evaluation
The product evaluation component of the model measures the impact of
the program to target beneficiaries. Evaluators assess the program effectiveness
and sustainability. As a summative component, decision whether to continue,
modify or terminate the program are established I this stage.
As a whole, the CIPP model looks at evaluation both in terms of processes
and products in all the various phases of school program, project, intervention,
curriculum, or initiative implementation. Outcomes and projected objectives are
matched and the discrepancies between them are considered as basis for future
plans and decisions.
APPLICATION
Activity 1 – Classify Them
Identify the tool that can be used in each level of evaluation activities.
Opinion polls Interest inventories

Observation guides Focus-group discussion
Personality inventories Interview guides
Tracer studies Rating scales
Anecdotal records National test results
Classroom Level Evaluation School System Level Evaluation
Opinion Polls Observation Guide

Interest Inventories Interview Guides
Focus-group Discussion Tracer Studies
Personality Inventories National Test Results
Rating Scales
Anecdotal Records
Guide Questions:
1. Which tool are best used in classroom level of evaluation?

School system level of evaluation?
I know that all tools are effective to use in classroom level of

evaluation and school system level of evaluation. But for me, the best
tool use for classroom level evaluation is Anecdotal Record.
Anecdotal records contains the academic performance of the child/
student inside the classroom as well as his/her performance. It can
be a basis and evidence if the child is passing or failing in the class
because it was being recorded in anecdotal records. While in school
system level of evaluation, I think the best tool that can be use is
National Test Result because it determine what students know and
understand throughout the school year.
2. Which tool/s may be used in either level?
Tools that is possible to use in either level is opinion polls.

Opinion polls is considered as a survey wherein it contains an idea or a
view and judgement in a particular topic. It can be used either in
classroom level evaluation and school system level evaluation because
we can collect and gathered information through it. Those information
will help to determine what are the things need to change and improve
in performance of the students and teachers especially in educational
system.
3. What must be the basis in selecting the tool to use in evaluation?
The basis in selecting the tool to use in evaluation is if that tool

is effective and efficient, measure and identified the skills of every
students and lastly able to meet the specific goals and learning
objectives in each lesson. It’s very important to have a basis because the
evaluation will be non-sense and not worth it if we don’t have a basis to
follow or to look to.
Activity 2
Determine in which CIPP component do each evaluator activities fall?
1. Determine the extent to which the program reached an

appropriate group of beneficiaries. PRODUCT
2. Assess the program’s work plan and schedule for sufficiency,

feasibility and viability. INPUT
3. Maintain an up-to-date profile of the program. PROCESS
4. Assess program goals in light of beneficiaries’ assessed needs and
potentially useful assets. CONTEXT
5. Assess the program’s proposed strategy for responsiveness to
assessed needs and feasibility. INPUT
6. Periodically interviews beneficiaries, program leaders, and staff to
obtain their assessments of the program’s progress. PROCESS
Alyssa Cepeda
BSE3A-Social Studies

Educational Evaluation Lesson 3 - Cipp Model

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Educational Evaluation Lesson 3 - Cipp Model

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Educational Evaluation Lesson 3 - Cipp Model

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION

LESSON 3 – CIPP Model

At the end of the lesson, the learners should be able to:

1. Explain the elements of the CIPP evaluation model; and

Opinion polls Interest inventories

Classroom Level Evaluation School System Level Evaluation

Opinion Polls Observation Guide

1. Which tool are best used in classroom level of evaluation?

I know that all tools are effective to use in classroom level of

Tools that is possible to use in either level is opinion polls.

3. What must be the basis in selecting the tool to use in evaluation?

The basis in selecting the tool to use in evaluation is if that tool

1. Determine the extent to which the program reached an

2. Assess the program’s work plan and schedule for sufficiency,

You might also like