Tutorial 7

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Accounting and Financial Management

Tutorial 7 Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis 1

1. What are the assumptions that underlie CVP analysis?

CVP analysis is a useful tool in analyzing the effects of changes in costs and volume on a company’s
profits. However, there are some assumptions which underline CVP analysis. When these assumptions
are not valid, the results of CVP analysis may be inaccurate. The five assumptions are:
1. The behavior of both costs and revenues is linear throughout the relevant range of the activity
index.
2. All costs can be classified with reasonable accuracy as either fixed or variable.
3. Changes in activity are the only factors that affect costs.
4. All units produced are sold.
5. When more than one type of product is sold, the sales mix will remain constant.

2. A company manufactures and sells a product with a unit selling price of $250, variable cost per
unit of $160, and fixed costs of $135,000.
(a) Calculate the breakeven point in units and in sales revenue.
(b) Calculate the sales in units and in dollars required to achieve a target operating profit of
$90,000.
(c) Prepare a CVP graph from zero units to 3,000 units of sales.

(i) The contribution margin per unit is $90 ($250 – $160).


$135,000
Therefore, BEP in units = = 1,500
$90

$90
Contribution margin ratio = = 0.36
$250

$135,000
BE revenue = = $375,000
0.36

$135,000 + $90,000 $225,000


(ii) Required sales in units = = = 2,500
$90 $90

$225,000
Required sales revenue = = $625,000
0.36

(iii)

Page 1 of 3
Accounting and Financial Management

3. Alden Company is the exclusive distributor for an automobile product that sells for $40 per unit
and has a CM ratio of 30%. The company’s fixed expenses are $180,000 per year. The company
plans to sell 16,000 units this year.
(a) What are the variable expenses per unit?
(b) What is the break-even point in unit sales and in dollar sales?
(c) Assume a tax rate of 20% applies to Alden Company. What amount of unit sales and dollar
sales is required to earn an annual after-tax profit of $48,000?
(d) Assume that by using a more efficient shipper, the company is able to reduce its variable
expenses by $4 per unit. What is the company’s new break-even point in unit sales and in
dollar sales?

(a) Variable expenses per unit = $40 × (1 – 0.30) = $28

$180,000 $180,000
(b) BEP in units = = = 15,000
$40 × 0.30 $12

$180,000
BE revenue = = $600,000
0.30

$48,000
$180,000 + [(1−0.20)]
(c) Required sales in units =
$12
$180,000 + $60,000
=
$12
= 20,000

$48,000
$180,000 + [(1−0.20)]
Required sales revenue =
0.30
$180,000 + $60,000
=
0.30
= $800,000

$180,000
(d) BEP in units = = 11,250
($40 × 0.30) + $4

BE revenue = 11,250 × $40 = $450,000

or

($40 × 0.30) + $4 $16


CMR = = = 40%
$40 $40

$180,000
BE revenue = = $450,000
0.4

Page 2 of 3
Accounting and Financial Management

4. Quantum Leap Sdn Bhd produces old-fashioned simple corkscrews. Last year was not a good year
for sales but Quantum Leap expects the market to pick up this year. Last year’s income statement
was:
Sales revenue ($250 per corkscrew) $375,000
Variable cost ($200 per corkscrew) 300,000
Contribution margin 75,000
Fixed cost 50,000
Operating profit 25,000

To take advantage of the anticipated growth in the market, Quantum Leap is considering the
following alternative courses of action.
(1) Do nothing. If Quantum Leap does nothing, it expects sales to increase by 12%.
(2) Spend $2,000 on a new advertising campaign (a fixed cost) that is expected to increase sales by
40%.
(3) Raise the price of the corkscrew to $300. This is expected to decrease sales quantities by 25%.
(4) Redesign the classic corkscrew and increase the selling price to $375 while increasing the
variable cost by $70 per corkscrew. The sales level is not expected to change from last year.

Required:
Evaluate each of the alternatives considered by Quantum Leap. What should Quantum Leap do?
(Hint: which alternative produces the highest operating profit?)

Units sold = Total sales ÷ Selling price = $375,000 ÷ $250 per unit = 1,500 units

(1) Sales increase 12%


Sales revenues 1,500  1.12  $250 $420,000
Variable costs 1,500  1.12  $200 336,000
Contribution margin 84,000
Fixed costs 50,000
Operating profit $ 34,000

(2) Increase fixed costs $2,000; Increase sales 40%


Sales revenues 1,500  1.40  $250 $525,000
Variable costs 1,500  1.40  $200 420,000
Contribution margin 105,000
Fixed costs ($50,000 + $2,000) 52,000
Operating profit $ 53,000

(3) Increase selling price to $300; Sales decrease 25%


Sales revenues 1,500  0.75  $300 $337,500
Variable costs 1,500  0.75  $200 225,000
Contribution margin 112,500
Fixed costs 50,000
Operating profit $ 62,500

(4) Increase selling price to $375; Variable costs increase $70 per corkscrew
Sales revenues 1,500  $375 $562,500
Variable costs 1,500  $270 405,000
Contribution margin 157,500
Fixed costs 50,000
Operating profit $107,500

Alternative (4) yields the highest operating income. If Quantum Leap is confident that unit sales will not
decrease despite increasing the selling price, it should choose alternative (4).

Page 3 of 3

You might also like