Sample Test: Summary Test in Lawyer-Linguists Competition
Sample Test: Summary Test in Lawyer-Linguists Competition
Sample Test: Summary Test in Lawyer-Linguists Competition
Example
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on conditions of entry and
residence of third-country nationals in the framework of an intra-corporate transfer.
However, a number of factors currently limit the scope for international companies to rely on mobility of intra-
corporate transferees. Many multinationals wishing to transfer their personnel have run into inflexibility and
limitations, including the lack of clear specific schemes in most EU Member States, the complexity of
requirements, costs, delays in granting visas or work permits and uncertainty about the rules and procedures. In
addition, there are big differences between Member States in terms of conditions of admission and restrictions on
family rights.
Measures to attract highly qualified third-country nationals, such as key staff of transnational corporations, are
part of the broader framework identified by the EU 2020 Strategy, which set the objective of the Union becoming
an economy based on knowledge and innovation, reducing the administrative burden on companies and better
matching labour supply with demand. Facilitation of intra-corporate transfers is also an objective shared by EU
trade policy.
This proposal complies with fundamental rights, especially Articles 15, 21 and 31 (fair and equal treatment), 12
(freedom of association and affiliation), 34 (social security) and 7 (respect for private and family life) of the Charter
of Fundamental Rights, as it recognises and safeguards the principle of equal treatment for intra-corporate
transferees and includes procedural guarantees and the right to family life.
Personal data that authorities are required to handle when implementing this proposal will have to be processed
in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal
data.
Analysis of the 130 contributions sent during the public consultation showed general support for a common EU
policy on economic immigration, albeit with big differences in the approaches to be followed and in the expected
end-result. Another clear request was to propose simple, non-bureaucratic and flexible solutions. As a large
number of Member States were not in favour of a horizontal approach, the Commission considered that a sectoral
approach was more realistic and would respond better to the requests for flexibility.
- A common legal framework laying down common conditions of admission for intra-corporate transferees,
including in terms of social and economic rights, would prevent the risk of unfair competition.
- The big differences between Member States in terms of entry procedures and temporary residency rights could
hamper uniform application of the international commitments which the EU and its Member States have taken on
in the WTO negotiations.
The proposal therefore complies with the subsidiarity principle.
The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reasons.
The instrument chosen is a directive, which gives Member States a high degree of flexibility when it comes to
implementation.
A directive is the appropriate instrument for this action: it sets binding minimum standards but gives Member
States flexibility in respect of the form and method for putting these principles into effect in their national legal
system and general context. Non-binding measures would have too limited an effect, as potential ICTs and their
host EU companies would continue to face an array of different rules for admission.
The action is limited to what is necessary to achieve the above aim. The proposed rules concern admission
conditions, procedure and permit, as well as rights of ICTs, including intra-EU mobility, hence the areas that
constitute elements of a common immigration policy under Article 79 of the Treaty. The administrative burden
imposed on Member State in terms of change of legislation (design of specific rules on intra-corporate transfer)
and cooperation would be moderate as intra-corporate transferees are already singled out by trade instruments
and as this burden would be outweighed by the large benefits flowing from the enhanced possibility to easily
transfer intra-corporate staff from one Member State to another.