Result of The 73rd Amendment
Result of The 73rd Amendment
Result of The 73rd Amendment
Improve your chances of cracking the IAS Exam by attempting the CSAT Mock Tests now!!
Village panchayats existed in India long before the act was passed in 1992, but the system had inherent weaknesses like the
inability to be a people’s government responsive to their needs. This was due to a variety of factors like a lack of financial
resources, no regular elections and inadequate representation of the weaker sections like scheduled castes/tribes and women.
The Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution of India lays down in Article 40 that the government shall facilitate the
establishment and smooth functioning of the gram panchayats.
In order to address these issues and strengthen the local self-governments in India, the central government brought about the
73rd Amendment Act in 1992. The act was passed in both houses and entered into force from 24 th April 1993.
This Act added a new chapter into the Constitution called ‘Part IX: The Panchayats’.
The chief features of the act are mentioned below:
o This Act made the Panchayati Raj institutions in the country constitutional bodies.
o Under Article 243-B, it has become compulsory for every state to establish panchayats in their territories.
o Article 243-G makes it mandatory for the state governments to devolve powers, responsibilities and authority to the
panchayats.
o The gram panchayats have a fixed tenure of 5 years.
o State election commissions have been provided with the mechanism to conduct independent elections to the village
panchayats.
o Article 243-D gives provisions for the due representation of women and SC/STs.
o The State Finance Commission should also evaluate the financial position of the panchayats every five years.
The passing of the 73rd Amendment has improved local self-government in the country vastly.
In order to celebrate this and further give impetus to the institutions, the central government in 2010 decided to observe 24 th April
every year as National Panchayati Raj Day.
Today, the formalised Panchayati raj functions in three levels namely, the Gram Panchayat (at the village level), the Mandal
Parishad/Panchayat Samiti/Block Samiti (at the Block level), and the Zila Parishad (at the district level).
2006: Nepali King Gyanendra restored the former Nepal House of Representatives and
ushered in democracy to the Himalayan Kingdom. This day is observed in Nepal as ‘Democracy Day’.
Candidates can find out what are the topics in the UPSC Exams by visiting the UPSC Syllabus page. For more preparation materials they can
refer to the links given in the table below.
Related Links
100 Differences Between GS 1 Structure, Strategy and Syllabus GS 2 Structure, Strategy and Syllabus
Articles for UPSC Mains for UPSC Mains
Directive Principles of State GS 3 Structure, Strategy and Syllabus Important Amendments in the Indian
Policy for UPSC Mains Constitution
Topic-wise GS 1 Questions for Topic-wise GS 2 Questions for UPSC Topic-wise GS 3 Questions for UPSC
UPSC Mains Mains Mains
Leave a Comment
Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *
*
Send OTP
until one year from the commencement of the proposed amendment and barring interference
1. Short title and commencement.-(1) This Act may be called the Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992.
(2) It shall come into force on such date_680 as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
2. Insertion of new Part IX.- After Part VIII of the Constitution, the following Part shall be inserted, namely:-
`PART IX
THE PANCHAYATS
(b) "Gram Sabha" means a body consisting of persons registered in the electoral rolls relating to a village comprised within the area of
(c) "Intermediate level" means a level between the village and district levels specified by the Governor of a State by public notification to
(d) "Panchayat" means an institution (by whatever name called) of self-government constituted under article 243B, for the rural areas;
(f) "population" means the population as ascertained at the last preceding census of which the relevant figures have been published;
(g) "village" means a village specified by the Governor by public notification to be a village for the purposes of this Part and includes a
243A. Gram Sabha.- A Gram Sabha may exercise such powers and perform such functions at the village level as the Legislature of a
243B. Constitution of Panchayats.- (1) There shall be constituted in every State, Panchayats at the village, intermediate and district levels
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (1), Panchayats at the intermediate level may not be constituted in a State having a population not
243C. Composition of Panchayats.- (1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, the Legislature of a State may, by law, make provisions
Provided that the ratio between the population of the territorial area of a Panchayat at any level and the number of seats in such
Panchayat to be filled by election shall, so far as practicable, be the same throughout the State.
(2) All the seats in a Panchayat shall be filled by persons chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies in the Panchayat area
and; for this purpose, each Panchayat area shall be divided into territorial constituencies in such manner that the ratio between the
population of each constituency and the number of seats allotted to it shall, so far as practicable, be the same throughout the Panchayat
area.
(3) The Legislature of a State may, by law, provide for the representation-
(a) of the Chairpersons of the Panchayats at the village level, in the Panchayats at the intermediate level or, in the case of a State not
having Panchayats at the intermediate level, in the Pancayats at the district level;
(b) of the Chairpersons of the Panchayats at the intermediate level, in the Panchayats at the district level;
(c) of the members of the House of the People and the members of the Legislative Assembly of the State representing constituencies
which comprise wholly or partly a Panchayat area at a level other than the village level, in such Panchayat;
(d) of the members of the Council of States and the members of the Legislative Council of the State, where they are registered as electors
within-
(i) a Panchayat area at the intermediate level, in Panchayat at the intermediate level;
(ii) a Panchayat area at the district level, in Panchayat at the district level.
(4) The Chairperson of a Panchayat and other members of a Panchayat whether or not chosen by direct election from territorial
constituencies in the Panchayat area shall have the right to vote in the meetings of the Panchayats.
(a) a Panchayat at the village level shall be elected in such manner as the Legislature of a State may, by law, provide; and
(b) a Panchayat at the intermediate level or district level shall be elected by, and from amongst, the elected members thereof.
in every Panchayat and the number of seats of reserved shall bear, as nearly as may be, the same proportion to the total number of seats
to be filled by direct election in that Panchayat as the population of the Scheduled Castes in that Panchayat area or of the Scheduled
Tribes in that Panchayat area bears to the total population of that area and such seats may be allotted by rotation to different
constituencies in a Panchayat.
(2) Not less than one-third of the total number of seats reserved under clause (1) shall be reserved for women belonging to the Scheduled
(3) Not less than one-third (including the number of seats reserved for women belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled
Tribes) of the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in every Panchayat shall be reserved for women and such seats may be
Scheduled Tribes and women in such manner as the Legislature of a State may, by law, provide:
Provided that the number of offices of Chairpersons reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Panchayats at
each level in any State shall bear, as nearly as may be, the same proportion to the total number of such offices in the Panchayats at each
level as the population of the Scheduled Castes in the State or of the Scheduled Tribes in the State bears to the total population of the
State:
Provided further that not less than one-third of the total number of offices of Chairpersons in the Panchayats at each level shall be
Provided also that the number of offices reserved under this clause shall be allotted by rotation to different Panchayats at each level.
(5) The reservation of seats under clauses (1) and (2) and the reservation of offices of Chairpersons (other than the reservation for
women) under clause (4) shall cease to have effect on the expiration of the period specified in article 334.
(6) Nothing in this Part shall prevent the Legislature of a State from making any provision for reservation of seats in any Panchayat or
offices of Chairpersons in the Panchayats at any level in favour of backward class of citizens.
243E. Duration of Panchayats, etc.- (1) Every Panchayat, unless sooner dissolved under any law for the time being in force, shall
continue for five years from the date appointed for its first meeting and no longer.
(2) No amendment of any law for the time being in force shall have the effect of causing dissolution of a Panchayat at any level, which is
functioning immediately before such amendment, till the expiration of its duration specified in clause (1).
(b) before the expiration of a period of six months from the date of its dissolution:
Provided that where the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued is less than six months, it shall
not be necessary to hold any election under this clause for constituting the Panchayat for such period.
(4) A Panchayat constituted upon the dissolution of a Panchayat before the expiration of its duration shall continue only for the
remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued under clause (1) had it not been so dissolved.
243F. Disqualifications for membership.-(1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of a Panchayat-
(a) if he is so disqualified by or under any law for the time being in force for the purposes of elections to the Legislature of the State
concerned:
Provided that no person shall be disqualified on the ground that he is less than twenty-five years of age, if he has attained the age of
twenty-one years;
(b) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by the Legislature of the State.
(2) If any question arises as to whether a member of a Panchayat has become subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause
(1), the question shall be referred for the decision of such authority and in such manner as the Legislature of a State may, by law,
provide.
243G. Powers, authority and responsibilities of Panchayats.- Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may,
by law, endow the Panchayats with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-
government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Panchayats at the appropriate
level, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to-
(a) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(b) the implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice as may be entrusted to them including those in relation
243H. Powers to impose taxes by, and Funds of, the Panchayats.-The Legislature of a State may, by law,-
(a) authorise a Panchayat to levy, collect and appropriate such taxes, duties, tolls and fees in accordance with such procedure and subject
to such limits;
(b) assign to a Panchayat such taxes, duties, tolls and fees levied and collected by the State Government for such purposes and subject to
(c) provide for making such grants-in-aid to the Panchayats from the Consolidated Fund of the State; and
(d) provide for Constitution of such Funds for crediting all moneys received, respectively, by or on behalf of the Panchayats and also for
243-I. Constitution of Finance Commission to review financial position.-(1) The Governor of a State shall, as soon as may be within one
year from the commencement of the Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992, and thereafter at the expiration of every fifth
year, constitute a Finance Commission to review the financial position of the Panchayats and to make recommendations to the Governor
as to-
(i) the distribution between the State and the Panchayats of the net proceeds of the taxes, duties, tolls and fees leviable by the State,
which may be divided between them under this Part and the allocation between the Panchayats at all levels of their respective shares of
such proceeds;
(ii) the determination of the taxes, duties, tolls and fees which may be assigned to, or appropriated by, the Panchayat;
(iii) the grants-in-aid to the Panchayats from the Consolidated Fund of the State;
(b) the measures needed to improve the financial position of the Panchayats;
(c) any other matter referred to the Finance Commission by the Governor in the interests of sound finance of the Panchayats.
(2) The Legislature of a State may, by law, provide for the composition of the commission, the qualifications which shall be requisite for
appointment as members thereof and the manner in which they shall be selected.
(3) The Commission shall determine their procedure and shall have such powers in the performance of their functions as the Legislature
(4) The Governor shall cause every recommendation made by the Commission under this article together with an explanatory
memorandum as to the action taken thereon to be laid before the Legislature of the State.
243J. Audit of accounts of Panchayats.- The Legislature of a State may, by law, make provisions with respect to the maintenance of
243K. Elections to the Panchayats.-(1) The superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of electoral rolls for, and the
conduct of, all elections to the Panchayats shall be vested in a State Election Commission consisting of a State Election Commissioner to
(2) Subject to the provisions of any law made by the Legislature of a State, the conditions of service and tenure of office of the State
Provided that the State Election Commissioner shall not be removed from his office except in like manner and on the like grounds as a
Judge of a High Court and the conditions of service of the State Election Commissioner shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his
appointment.
(3) The Governor of a State shall, when so requested by the State Election Commission, make available to the State Election
Commission such staff as may be necessary for the discharge of the functions conferred on the State Election Commission by clause (1).
(4) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, make provision with respect to all matters
243L. Application to Union territories.-The provisions of this Part shall apply to the Union territories and shall, in their application to a
Union territory, have effect as if the references to the Governor of a State were references to the Administrator of the Union territory
appointed under article 239 and references to the Legislature or the Legislative Assembly of a State were references, in relation to a
Provided that the President may, by public notification, direct that the provisions of this Part shall apply to any Union territory or part
thereof subject to such exceptions and modifications as he may specify in the notification.
243M. Part not to apply to certain areas.-(1) Nothing in this Part shall apply to the Scheduled Areas referred to in clause (1), and the
(b) the Hill Areas in the State of Manipur for which District Councils exist under any law for the time being in force.
(3) Nothing in this Part-
(a) relating to Panchayats at the district level shall apply to the hill areas of the District of Darjeeling in the State of West Bengal for
which Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council exists under any law for the time being in force;
(b) shall be construed to affect the functions and powers of the Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council constituted under such law.
(a) the Legislature of a State referred to in sub-clause (a) of clause (2) may, by law, extend this Part to that State, except the areas, if any,
referred to in clause (1), if the Legislative Assembly of that State passes a resolution to that effect by a majority of the total membership
of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting;
(b) Parliament may, by law, extend the provisions of this Part to the Scheduled Areas and the tribal areas referred to in clause (1) subject
to such exceptions and modifications as may be specified in such law, and no such law shall be deemed to be an amendment of this
243N. Continuance of existing laws and Panchayats.-Notwithstanding anything in this Part, any provision of any law relating to
Panchayats in force in a State immediately before the commencement of the Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992, which
is inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall continue to be in force until amended or repealed by a competent Legislature or other
competent authority or until the expiration of one year from such commencement, whichever is earlier:
Provided that all the Panchayats existing immediately before such commencement shall continue till the expiration of their duration,
unless sooner dissolved by a resolution passed to that effect by the Legislative Assembly of that State or, in the case of a State having a
243-O. Bar to interference by courts in electoral matters.- Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution,-
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or
purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner
Constitution, after sub-clause (b), the following sub-clause shall be inserted, namely:-
"(bb) the measures needed to augment the Consolidated Fund of a State to supplement the resources of the Panchayats in the State on the
"ELEVENTH SCHEDULE
(Article 243G)
5. Fisheries.
13. Roads, culverts, bridges, ferries, waterways and other means of communication.
20. Libraries.
23. Health and sanitation, including hospitals, primary health centres and dispensaries.
26. Social welfare, including welfare of the handicapped and mentally retarded.
27. Welfare of the weaker sections, and in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.
amendment in the form of a joint resolution. Since the President does not have a constitutional role in the
amendment process, the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval. Thirty-three
amendments to the United States Constitution have been proposed by the United States Congress and sent to
the states for ratification since the Constitution was put into operation on March 4, 1789. Twenty-seven of
these, having been ratified by the requisite number of states, are part of the Constitution. The first ten
amendments were adopted and ratified simultaneously and are known collectively as the Bill of Rights. Six
amendments adopted by Congress and sent to the states have not been ratified by the required number of
states. Four of these amendments are still technically open and pending, one is closed and has failed by its
own terms, and one is closed and has failed by the terms of the resolution proposing it.
The Constitution of United Kingdom can be called to be a flexible one. A flexible constitution is one that may be
amended by a simple act of the legislature, in the same way as it passes ordinary laws. The ‘uncodified’
constitution of the United Kingdom consists partly of important statutes, and partly of certain unwritten
conventions. The statutes that make up the United Kingdom constitution can be amended by a simple act of
Parliament. United Kingdom constitutional conventions are held to evolve organically over time.
On comparison of the amending procedures in relation to the Constitutions of the three countries, it can clearly
be seen the United States’ procedure is the most time consuming and difficult based upon the sheer need for
every amendment needing states’ ratification. The Indian procedure is in between then other two countries in
terms of the difficulty involved as to the amending of Constitution as the Centre has all power to amend the
Constitution and the ratification of states is only needed on certain amendments involving the interests of the
state governments. This makes the procedure less time consuming than the one in United States. The
procedure in the United Kingdom is the least time consuming and easiest of the three. The Constitution of
United Kingdom is not a written document and the political set up of United Kingdom leads to there being no
need for state participation per se. The House of Commons and House of Lords can vote and make decisions
and thus there isn’t a case wherein a bill proposing the amendment may not be ratified. This comparison
clearly reflects upon the political character of the nations and the working of the government there.
The question as to limitation on the powers of the government has been brought before the court and there
have been a series of overruled judgements until the landmark judgment of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of
Kerala[ii]. The interpretation used by the court herein considers the Constitution as a dynamic body and gives
the government powers to amend it whilst keeping the basic essence of the legislation alive and protecting the
values upon which it was drafted by the Constituent assembly.
In the cases of Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India[iii] and Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan[iv], the
Supreme court ruled in favour of government giving them unlimited powers to amend the Constitution. It was
further held that Constitutional amendments under Article 368 were said to be outside the definition of ‘law’
under Article 13 (2).
In the case of Golaknath v. State of Punjab[v], Constitutional amendments under Article 368 were held to be
within the meaning of ‘law’ under Article 13 and the government had limited powers as to the amendability of
the Part III of the Constitution. This judgement overruled the previous judgements and put restrictions upon the
amendability of the Constitution.
In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala[vii], features like Supremacy of the Constitution, Republican and
Democratic form of governance, separation of powers, secular and sovereign character were found to be part
of the basic structure. In the cases of Indira Gandhi v. Rajnarian[viii] and Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu and ors.
[ix], Rule of Law was considered to be a part of the basic structure. In the S.R. Bommai v. U.O. I[x], Federalism
was held to be an essential feature of the Constitution and hence part of the basic structure. The Minerva Mills
v. U.O. I[xi] case recognized judicial review as a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. In Re: The
Berubari Union case[xii], the court found the preamble to not be a part of the Constitution, which was overruled
in the Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala[xiii] and the preamble could only be amended in terms of the
basic structure doctrine.
The basic structure doctrine has thus substantiated limitations as to the amount of amendability is allowed.
The government can amend any part of the Constitution but the amendment cannot be affecting any of the
features under the basic structure doctrine. Hence the Constitution can be kept updated and irrelevant things
can be removed but the essence or the soul of the Constitution cannot be fiddled with. This also makes the
Constitution indestructible and thus it neither be taken down completely at any point of time nor can it be
superseded to gain unsanctioned powers. There is hence no way to dismantle the Indian Constitutional setup
and to get away with the Constitution.
CONCLUSION
The Indian Constitution was made to be a dynamic legislation to hold validity over a number of years without
being outdated and still look after the interests of the varied groups in the Indian population. It can clearly be
seen to have been drafted by taking into consideration the best features from Constitutions around the world.
The Basic Structure doctrine propounded by the honourable Supreme Court is the guiding principle to
safeguard these values and keep the essence of the Constitution intact. Further the comparison with other
countries shows the clear balance in the amount of difficulty and procedural working required to amend the
Constitution in India, making it one of the best examples of its kind.
REFERENCES
[i] S.R. Bommai v. U.O.I, AIR 1994 SC 1918.
[vi] Id note 2.
[vii] Supra 2.
[xiii] Supra 2.
said that “Parliament has no authority to amend Part III of the Constitution to abolish or abridge the fundamental
freedoms.” based on the judgement of Kesavananda Bharati case, C.J. Sikri opined that the basic structure of the
Constitution shall consist of the following characteristics:
It is true that, according to Article 368 of the Indian Constitution, Parliament has the power to amend the
Constitution, but it can not change the Constitution’s basic structure because India’s Constitution is a fundamental
law of the land.
Conclusion
One point that stands out before us in the process set down in Article 368 is that the Parliament seems to have the
exclusive right in any direction to change the Constitution. But it is incorrect to say that the Parliament is
independent, so as long as there is a mechanism under Article 368. Parliament can not be the deciding authority of
the constitutional scheme since the procedure itself restricts the use of the power to amend the Constitution on the
Parliament. The Indian Constitution has been made as a dynamic statute that retains validity over years without
being obsolete and also takes care of the needs of the various classes within the Indian society. It can be seen to
have been drafted taking into account the best features of the Constitutions around the world. The doctrine of the
Basic Structure proposed by the honourable Supreme Court is the guiding principle for safeguarding those values
and keeping intact the essence of the Constitution. The contrast with other countries further demonstrates the
strong difference in the amount of complexity and bureaucratic effort needed to change the Constitution in India,
rendering it one of the strongest.
Reference
https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/128262/16/09_chapter%203.pdf
http://www.legalserviceindia.com/article/l70-Article368.html
http://ncert.nic.in/ncerts/l/keps209.pdf
https://www.worldwidejournals.com/global-journal-for-research-analysis-
GJRA/recent_issues_pdf/2015/August/August_2015_1438858219__14.pdf
http://thelawbrigade.com/constitutional-law/the-basic-structure-doctrine-and-the-power-to-amend-the-
constitution-in-india-a-comparative
The Constitution can be split into two – regulated and unregulated procedural. Where the Constitution is sovereign
and the government is a legislative entity with limitations on its authority, the statutes are liable to be stuck as
ultra vires if they break legislative law, it can be considered a ‘regulated State’. The authority of the legislature to
filter the Constitution of such a state is either limited or inexistent. On the other hand, in an ‘unregulated
constitution’ such as that of the United Kingdom, where the parliament is sovereign and has absolute authority, the
constitutional rule can be changed simply by enacting legislation following it. The Indian Constitution is managed,
the power to amend it requires a great deal of wisdom and minimal effort as the cases where the same is
concerned require a great deal of effort.
India’s constitution lays out the basis on which Indian polity is ruled. The Constitution declares India to be an
independent, democratic socialist republic, promising order, dignity and freedom for its people. This was approved
on 26 November 1949 by India’s Constituent Assembly and came into force on 26 January 1950. India celebrates
Republic Day on 26 January each year. It is the longest written constitution in the history of any sovereign country,
with 395 articles and 12 schedules, as well as various revisions, for a total of 117,369 words in the English
language version.
1. Amendments may be made by a simple majority of Parliament to certain provisions of the Constitution, in
the same manner as the ordinary statute is adopted by Parliament. These changes can be transferred in
the case of a government of a member, or the case of a government of the European Union.
2. Modification of specific provisions of the Constitution may take place by a simple majority of the
Legislature of the State in the same manner as the ordinary act.
3. Amendments to certain provisions, sometimes referred to as enshrined provisions, may only be made by a
special majority of Parliament. By a majority of the total membership of each House, and by a majority of
not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting in each House. For the intent of amending the
Constitution, no joint sitting of both houses may be held.
4. Amendments to such laws require not less than half of the States, in addition to a special majority of
legislative confirmation.
Simple majority
Constitution’s provisions may be amended by a simple vote, as this is necessary for the passing of common law.
The Parliament of the state legislatures may amend these provisions by a simple majority since they do not affect
or disturb the federal balance of power between the Union and the states. Since the entry and formation of new
states would change the constitution’s federal character. Some of the provisions that can be amended are :
There are 98 subjects on the Union List, over which the Union has exclusive authority. The topics on the Union list,
for example, security and foreign relations, are of national significance, etc. There are 59 topics in the State List
over which countries have exclusive jurisdiction. The concerns listed on a State list, such as public order, police and
public safety, are of local or national importance. The Concurrent List contains 52 subjects like criminal and civil
cases, marriage and divorce, economic and special planning unions, money, media, magazines, employment,
management of the population and preparation of the families, etc. and both the Union and States can enact laws
on this list but the federal rule prevails over state law in the case of a dispute between the law of the Central and
the State law. The purpose of the constitutional inclusion of the list was to ensure continuity in key legal principles
across the country. Legislatures both in the parliament and in the State may make laws on matters mentioned
above, but a preliminary and ultimate right of the centre is to legislate on established matters. In the event of a
conflict between the law of the State and the law of the Union on a subject in the Concurrent List, the law of the
Parliament shall prevail.
Entry 97 of List I also provides for the exclusive powers of Parliament to make laws on all subjects not mentioned
in List II or III. The remaining powers of legislation shall be solely delegated to the Union Parliament under Article
248 and Entry 97 List I. The spectrum of residual powers, however, is limited as all the topics included in all three
lists and residual powers come under, or not, the Court’s view of a case. The reasoning for this power is that it
allows the House to legislate on any issue that has avoided the House’s oversight and on the subject that currently
can not be recognized. It requires Parliament, therefore, to enact legislation on topics that have taken society
forward. The constitutional framers intended, however, that the use of residual powers should be the final and not
the first step.
In the case of Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab and UOI v. H.S. Dhillon’s case, the court held that parliament may
combine its power with the residual power under Article 248 under entry into the Union List or Competition List.
Also in the case of UOI v. H.S. Dhillon, it was held that Gift Tax Act, Inquiry Act Commissions, etc. are valid under
the parliamentary residuary power. In the case of State of A. P. v. National Thermal Power Corpn. Ltd. the
Supreme court held that unless an entry does not state an exclusion from the area of legislation that is evident at
the time of obvious reading, the absence of exclusion can not be read, if a particular clause in the Constitution that
forbids such legislation is valid, as allowing the legislative power not expressly excluded from it.
Conclusion
The Constitution authorizes the centre in the following ways to have control over the state legislature:
1. The Governor can withhold for President’s consideration those forms of bills approved by the State
legislature. The President has an absolute veto on them.
2. In the State legislature, even with the prior approval of the President as imposing limitations on free
trade and commerce can bill are made on such matters enumerated in the State list.
3. It is necessary for the President for the States to withhold the bills of funds and other budgetary
measures approved during national crises by the State legislature.
As a result, it is very clear from the scheme of allocation of legislative powers between the Union and the States
that framers have bestowed more authority on the Parliament than against the States. The States do not have sole
authority over the topics given to the States by the Constitution and therefore rendering the States, to that degree,
subordinate to the Centre. The centralization pattern is contradictory with the fundamental values but, rather than
adopting conventional provisions of a federal constitution, the legislative system is more concerned with country
unity. All these provisions of the constitution are therefore justified as they offer clarification and eradicate the
confusion between the powers of the centre and state. Unless this theory of legislative supremacy were to be
removed, there would be a risk of two similarly dominant pieces of government giving rise to a dispute, agitation,
confrontation, and confusion as a result of competing legislation. These provisions guarantee that there is an
overarching regulatory framework and that there is continuity in the basic laws.
Reference