Updated Test Questions Evaluation Tool

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region VII
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TOLEDO CITY
TEST QUESTIONS EVALUATION TOOL
Learning Area: ____________________________
Title: ____________________________
Grade Level: ____________________________
Review the learning resource (test questions) based on the following criteria. Tick the
appropriate column found beside each criterion item. If your answer is NO, write your
recommendation/s in the NO column.
CRITERION ITEMS YES NO
I. Content
1. Learning Competencies
a. Content is consistent with the targeted DepEd

Learning Competencies intended for the
learning area and grade level.
2. Instructional Quality
a. The LR contributes to the achievement of

specific objectives of the learning area and
grade level for which it is intended.
b. The LR is free from any social content
violations.
c. Level of difficulty is appropriate for the
intended user.
d. Content and information are accurate and up-
to-date.
e. LR is free from factual errors.
f. LR is free from computational errors.
3. Assessment
Address: D. Macapagal Highway, Poblacion, Toledo City

Tel. No.: (032) 322-7770; Fax. No.: (032) 467-8629;
Email Address: [email protected]
Region VII
a. The LR provides useful measures and
information that help the teacher evaluate
learner’s progress in mastering the target
competencies.
b. The LR is suitable and keyed in to objectives
and content.
c. The LR is based on Cognitive Process Kindly write
here the
Dimensions– remembering, understanding, dimension
applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating.
II. Language
1. Coherence and Clarity of Thought
a. Do the statements / phrases make sense?
b. Do the sentences in the paragraph contribute

to one idea?
c. Are the thoughts / ideas logically sequenced?
d. Are conjunctions and transitional phrases used

to link sentences or paragraphs?
e. Is the choice of words / expressions appropriate?
f. Are the sentences easily understood?
g. Is the language appropriate for the target

readers?
2. Grammar and Syntax
a. Is there an agreement between subject and

verb?
b. Are modifiers properly placed?
c. Are antecedents clear?
d. Are there no faulty parallel constructions?
e. Is there no overuse of certain words?
f. Are there no redundancies?
3. Spelling and Punctuation
a. Are words, whether local or foreign, correctly

spelled?

Tel. No.: (032) 322-7770; Fax. No.: (032) 467-8629;
Region VII
b. Are the right punctuations in the right places?
c. Is the use of the serial comma (comma before

and and or observed?
III. Format/Guidelines
1. Does the stem clearly present the problem to be

addressed?
2. Are options parallel in type of content?
3. Do the options avoid repetitive words?
4. Is the stem free from extraneous content?
5. Is the grammar consistent with the stem?
6. Are options arranged alphabetically (names)?
7. Are options arranged in sequence (numbers)?
8. Are options arranged chronologically (dates)?
9. Are options arranged chronologically (passages)?
10. Is the need for the same tense or person

observed?
11. Are options kept either singular or plural?
12. Is the proper noun used to complete a sentence

capitalized?
13. Are phrases used to complete a sentence in
lowercase?
14. Are the letters of choices formatted vertically?
15. Are the letters of choices capitalized?
16. Is there an option which is clearly best?
17. Does the font used Arial?
18. Are quotes, lines from a poem, part of a story,

passages, and the like italicized?
19. Are words such as NOT, TRUE, NOT TRUE,
EXCEPT, FALSE, and BEST highlighted?
(Capitalized, Boldfaced, italicized, Underlined)

Tel. No.: (032) 322-7770; Fax. No.: (032) 467-8629;
Region VII
20. Are negatively stated stems used sparingly?
21. Are the choices all of the above and none of the
above used sparingly and not made the right answer
at all times?
22. Are tricky questions avoided?
23. Where alternative spellings are permitted, was a

choice made and used consistently throughout the
materials?
24. Are charts, tables, or figures used?
25. Are real life situations/current events used in

presenting situations?
Recommendation: (Please put a check mark in the appropriate box.)
Minor revision. This material is found compliant to all criteria. However, minimal revision is
recommended following the recommendations under the NO column.
Major revision. This material is non-compliant to any of the criteria thus, major revision is
recommended following the recommendations under the NO column.
For submission. This material is found compliant to all criteria with NO corrections.
I / We certify that this summary report and recommendation(s) are my / our own and have been made
without any undue influence from others.
Evaluators: ____________________ ____________________ ____________________

Evaluators: ____________________ ____________________ ____________________
Date Accomplished: ____________________
Note: May be accomplished individually (for consolidation)
References:
Quality Assurance of Learning Resources Manual Version 1.0. (July 25, 2019). Annex B.1.1
Content Evaluation Tool. Annex B.1.2 Language Evaluation Tool.
Quileste, Ronald M. (MAED). Improving Your Skills in Test Construction.
Raagas, Ester L. (2010). Assessment and Evaluation of Student Learning: Concepts and
Applications (3rd Edition), ELR DATStat Analysis Center, Cagayan de Oro City
CID/LRMS/ECL/Test Questions Evaluation Tool

April 18, 2020

Tel. No.: (032) 322-7770; Fax. No.: (032) 467-8629;
Region VII

Tel. No.: (032) 322-7770; Fax. No.: (032) 467-8629;

Updated Test Questions Evaluation Tool

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Updated Test Questions Evaluation Tool

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Updated Test Questions Evaluation Tool

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

TEST QUESTIONS EVALUATION TOOL

Learning Area: ____________________________

Grade Level: ____________________________

CRITERION ITEMS YES NO

a. Content is consistent with the targeted DepEd

a. The LR contributes to the achievement of

f. LR is free from computational errors.

Address: D. Macapagal Highway, Poblacion, Toledo City

a. Do the statements / phrases make sense?

b. Do the sentences in the paragraph contribute

d. Are conjunctions and transitional phrases used

f. Are the sentences easily understood?

g. Is the language appropriate for the target

a. Is there an agreement between subject and

c. Are antecedents clear?

d. Are there no faulty parallel constructions?

e. Is there no overuse of certain words?

f. Are there no redundancies?

3. Spelling and Punctuation

a. Are words, whether local or foreign, correctly

Address: D. Macapagal Highway, Poblacion, Toledo City

c. Is the use of the serial comma (comma before

1. Does the stem clearly present the problem to be

3. Do the options avoid repetitive words?

4. Is the stem free from extraneous content?

5. Is the grammar consistent with the stem?

6. Are options arranged alphabetically (names)?

7. Are options arranged in sequence (numbers)?

8. Are options arranged chronologically (dates)?

9. Are options arranged chronologically (passages)?

10. Is the need for the same tense or person

12. Is the proper noun used to complete a sentence

15. Are the letters of choices capitalized?

16. Is there an option which is clearly best?

17. Does the font used Arial?

18. Are quotes, lines from a poem, part of a story,

Address: D. Macapagal Highway, Poblacion, Toledo City

23. Where alternative spellings are permitted, was a

25. Are real life situations/current events used in

Recommendation: (Please put a check mark in the appropriate box.)

Evaluators: ____________________ ____________________ ____________________

Quileste, Ronald M. (MAED). Improving Your Skills in Test Construction.

CID/LRMS/ECL/Test Questions Evaluation Tool

Address: D. Macapagal Highway, Poblacion, Toledo City

Address: D. Macapagal Highway, Poblacion, Toledo City

You might also like

Evaluators: