US v. Basa

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-3540. March 19, 1907. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE LOPEZ BASA,


Defendant-Appellant.

Leocadio Joaquin, for Appellant.

Attorney-General Araneta, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS

1. MUNICIPAL CODE; INTEREST IN CONTRACTS. — The submission, by a member of


a municipal council, of a proposition to do certain work for the municipality, which
proposition was never accepted, is not a violation of article 28 of the Municipal code,
which punishes an officer of a municipality who becomes interested in any contract
work of the municipality.

2. ACTS OF THE COMMISSION; PENAL CODE. — The last paragraph of article 3 of


the Penal Code relating to attempts to commit crimes is not applicable to crimes
defined by laws of the Commission.

DECISION

WILLARD, J. :

The municipality of Gasan, on the Islands of Marinduque advertised for proposals to


furnish the municipality with street lamps. The defendant, in answer to such
advertisement, submitted a proposition in writing by which he agreed to furnish the
municipality the lamps at a price therein named. He was at that time a member of
the municipal council.

Section 28 of the Municipal Code (Act No. 82) is as follows: jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"(a) No municipal officer shall be directly or indirectly interested in any contract


work, or cockpits, or other permitted games and amusements or business of the
municipality, or in the purchase of any real estate or any other property belonging to
the corporation.
"(b) Any officer violating the provisions of this section shall, upon a two-thirds vote
of all the members of the council, be removed from office; and, upon trial and
conviction in a court of competent jurisdiction, shall be imprisoned for not less than
six months and not more than two years." cralaw virtua1aw library

The court below held that the submission of this proposition by the defendant, when
he was a member of the council, was a violation of section 28, and he was convicted
therefor.

We agree with the Attorney-General that the conviction can not be sustained. The
offer which the defendant made was never accepted by the municipality. He
therefore never became "interested in any contract work or business of the
municipality."
cralaw virtua1aw library

Section 28 does not punish an attempt to commit this crime. In offenses created by
acts of the Commission, the last paragraph of article 3 of the Penal Code relating to
attempts to commit crimes is not applicable.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and the defendant is acquitted of the
complaint, with the costs of both instances de oficio.

After the expiration of ten days let judgment be entered in accordance herewith and
ten days thereafter let the case be remanded to the court from whence it came for
execution. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson, and Tracey, JJ., concur.

You might also like