Dermabrasion Micro Dermabrasion
Dermabrasion Micro Dermabrasion
Dermabrasion Micro Dermabrasion
net/publication/324006370
CITATIONS READS
0 630
1 author:
Shikhar Ganjoo
SGT Medical College, Hospital & Research Institute
27 PUBLICATIONS 36 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Comparative study of microneedling and PRP vs microneedling in androgenic alopecia View project
A study of association of reactive toe nail with radiological plantar enthesopathy View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Shikhar Ganjoo on 06 June 2020.
Chapter
fewer complications. There is no need for local a recent course of isotretinoin therapy. As
anesthesia or high surgical skills compared a result, it is currently recommended that
with traditional dermabrasion.5,6 patients wait at least 6 months after completion
However, in the authors’ experience, if of isotretinoin therapy before undergoing
the operator is not careful and uniform in a dermabrasion procedure. Despite this
movement, there may be superficial abrasions recommendation, there are reports of patients
that may end up with pigmentory disturbances undergoing dermabrasion with current
or superficial scarring. So it is imperative to be isotretinoin therapy, without hypertrophic
gentle and uniform while doing the procedure scar formation.8,9
and also to apply gentle vacuum to start with The authors recommend that the patients
and then build up the pressure gradually. should be primed with a triple combination or
Farris and Rietschel 7 did a study hydroquinone or retinoids at least 2 weeks prior
to determine if latex exposure caused to the dermabrasion sessions. Also strict sun
an acute urticarial response following protection should be prescribed between the
microdermabrasion in a latex-allergic patient. sessions and thereafter. This can go a long way
The patient was prick tested to saline and to prevent complications like postprocedure
histamine controls, latex, and sterile medical hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation.
grade 100 m aluminum oxide crystals that had Gogia and Grekin10 reported eruptive self-
been passed through the microdermabrader. resolving keratoacanthomas that developed
The strongly positive latex prick test confirmed after treatment with photodynamic therapy
latex allergy in the patient. Negative prick and microdermabrasion. Microdermabrasion
testing to aluminum oxide crystals that had is well tolerated by most patients and minimal
passed through the microdermabrader make side effects have been reported, among which
it unlikely that the patient was exposed to latex are a mild to moderate erythema, which
via this system. Physicians need to carefully lasts on average 1 or 2 days after treatment,
evaluate patients who are considering mild discomfort during the procedure, and
microdermabrasion and appreciate that a tingling sensation. Literature describes
unexpected serious complications can occur. only uncomfortable feeling of a low intensity
Dermabrasion has many potential that occurred during the procedure and the
complications, most of which are often operator appearance of mild to moderate erythema
and technique dependent. Photosensitivity after the procedure lasting up to 2 days. The
occurs universally postprocedure, and negative pressure applied to the skin is also
patients must use strict sun protection while responsible for the appearance of erythema,
the skin re-epithelializes. Additionally, partly by increasing local blood circulation,
erythema after dermabrasion can last several and may contribute to faster healing and
weeks to months, and can be treated in part repair.11
with topical corticosteroids. Postinflammatory In the authors practice, mild erythema
pigmentation alterations, especially persisting for a few weeks after the procedure
hypopigmentation, are frequent complications has been experienced. This is usually self-
that can be permanent. Postprocedural limiting and resolves on its own. Resolution
hypertrophic scarring is a potential risk. This may be hastened with use of emollients
phenomenon was first reported in patients containing hyaluronic acid that maintains
undergoing dermabrasion after receiving moisture and suppleness of the skin. Of course
174 Complications of Cosmetology Crafting Cures
sun protection has to be strictly followed and factors like skin hydration, turgor, and
to avoid development of postinflammatory texture should be taken into account. If the
hyperpigmentation. skin is dry or irritated, the procedure can be
Svider and Jiron12 did a study to enumerate postponed until the skin becomes better. This
the factors raised in litigation following these will prevent the development of side effects.
procedures that included poor cosmetic Also maintenance of hydration of the skin
outcome (80%), alleged intratreatment postdermabrasion is extremely important
negligence (68%), permanent injury (64%), since the deficient epidermis during the
informed-consent deficits (60%), emotional/ postprocedure period is prone to TEWL
psychological injury (44%), post-treatment and dehydration. So hyaluronic acid based
negligence (32%), and the need for additional moisturizers are of great help.
treatment/surgery (32%). Fakhouri and Harmon 14 reported a
Kim and Lim13 did a study with an objective very serious side effect in which the patient
to see changes in transepidermal water loss developed subarachnoid hemorrhage during
(TEWL), hydration, and erythema of the face dermabrasion for scar revision and was on of
following diamond microdermabrasion. direct thrombin inhibitors.
Twenty-eight patients were included in this Local side effects are uncommon and
spilt face study. Transepidermal water loss, transient but include pain, burning, sensitive
stratum corneum hydration, and the degree skin, photosensitivity, tiger stripes, or diffuse
of erythema were measured from the right hyperpigmentation. Workers who routinely
and left sides of the face (forehead and cheek) inhale silica dust (silicosis), asbestos fibers
at baseline. One side of the face was treated (asbestosis), or hard metal dust are at risk
with diamond microdermabrasion and the of pulmonary fibrosis. Hence, the operator
other side was left untreated. Measurements must protect himself/herself with a mask.
were taken right after the procedure and The crystals may also get into the eyes of the
repeated at set time intervals. Diamond operator or more commonly the patient.
microdermabrasion was associated with Hence, the patient must wear protective
a statistically significant increase in TEWL eyewear during the procedure.15
immediately after the procedure and at 24
hours. However, on day 2, levels of TEWL were REFERENCES
back to baseline. An increase in hydration 1. Lawrence N, Mandy S, Yarborough J, Alt T. History of
and erythema was observed right after dermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:95-101.
microdermabrasion, but both returned to 2. Iverson PC. Surgical removal of traumatic tattoos of the
baseline on day 1. The results of their study face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1946;1947:427-32.
3. Robbins N. Dr Abner Kurtin, father of ambulatory
showed that skin barrier function of the
dermabrasion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1988;14:425-31.
forehead and cheek recovers within 2 days 4. Kleinerman R, Armstrong AW, Ibrahimi OA, King TH,
of diamond microdermabrasion. Diamond Eisen DB. Electrobrasion vs. manual dermabrasion: a
microdermabrasion performed on a weekly randomized, double-blind, comparative effectiveness trial.
basis, as presently done, is expected to allow British J Dermatol. 2014;171:124-9.
sufficient time for the damaged skin to recover 5. Karimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, Hamilton
T, Hammerberg C, et al. Microdermabrasion with and
its barrier function in most parts of the face. without aluminum oxide crystal abrasion: a comparative
The authors recommend that the skin of molecular analysis of dermal remodelling. J Am Acad
every patient be assessed before each session Dermatol. 2006;54:405-10.
Adverse Effects of Dermabrasion and Microdermabrasion 175
6. Andrews SN, Zarnitsyn V, Bondy B, Prausnitz MR. 11. Fernandes M, Pinheiro NM, Crema VO, Mendonça AC.
Optimization of microdermabrasion for controlled removal Effects of microdermabrasion on skin rejuvenation. J
of stratum corneum. Int J Pharm. 2011;407:95-104. Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014;16:26-31.
7. Farris PK, Rietschel RL. An unusual acute urticarial 12. Svider PF, Jiron J, Zuliani G, Shkoukani MA, Folbe AJ,
response following microdermabrasion. Dermtol Surg. Carron M. Unattractive Consequences: litigation from
2002;28:606-8. facial dermabrasion and chemical peels. Aesthet Surg J.
8. Fernandes M, Pinheiro NM, Crema VO, Mendonça AC. 2014;34:1244-49.
Effects of microdermabrasion on skin rejuvenation. J 13. Kim HS, Lim SH, Song JY, Kim MY, Lee JH, Park JG,
Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014;16:26-31 et al. Skin barrier function recovery after diamond
9. Kleinerman R, Armstrong AW, Ibrahimi OA, King TH, microdermabrasion. J Dermatol. 2009;36:529-33.
Eisen DB. Electrobrasion vs. manual dermabrasion: a 14. Fakhouri TM, Harmon CB. Hemorrhagic complications of
randomized, double-blind, comparative effectiveness trial.
direct thrombin inhibitors—subarachnoid hemorrhage
Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:124-9.
during dermabrasion for scar revision. Dermatol Surg.
10. Gogia R, Grekin RC, Shinkai K. Eruptive self-resolving 2013;39:1410-12.
keratoacanthomas developing after treatment with
15. Savardekar P. Microdermabrasion. Indian J Dermatol
photodynamic therapy and microdermabrasion. Dermatol
Surg. 2013;39:1717-20. Venereol Leprol. 2007;73:277-9.