War On Poverty
War On Poverty
War On Poverty
Name:
Course:
Professor:
Date:
Introduction
Forty nine years ago, 12 million Americans spent most of their nights without having the
opportunity to eat any food. Accordingly, the then President, Lyndon Johnson declared war on
poverty and never to rest until they had won the noble war. The efforts of this administration
paved way for the creation of the most adored poverty programs of the modern day social safety
net in America (Soderberg and Brian 279). For instance, programs such as the food stamps, head
starts, Medicaid and Medicare continue to benefit millions of Americans today. However, the
prevalence rate of poverty in the present day society shows that the subsequent administrations
have done little to continue with the war on poverty declared on the January 8, 1964. Today, over
49 million Americans, rely on government food stamps in order to escape spending a night
without food. The previous and current administrations have done little to fund the war on
poverty with the same enthusiasm that they have funded conceptual wars against terror and drugs
and real but unjust wars against Iraq. Amazingly, some administrations dismissed the war on
poverty simply because poverty programs bread criminals, slothfulness, laziness, dependency,
unproductive citizens and single parenthood among other undesired results (Patten 21). For
Surname 2
instance, twenty four years after President Lyndon’s declarations, President Ronald Reagan
delivered his final state of the Union Speech in which he cynically declared that poverty had won
America’s war on poverty. His audience that comprised rich individuals who have no knowledge
about poverty rumbled idiotically in laughter because they failed to realize that the
socioeconomic policies they advanced had utterly failed the middle class and the poor citizens of
However, despite the huge responsibility that the government has in fighting poverty and
alleviating the living standards of the poor, this war demands collective responsibility from
various stakeholders in the society. Similarly, the first stone or any other weapon used in the war
must be cast by the poor individual in order for the war against poverty to be won fairly and
squarely. Therefore, this essay paints the actual picture of poverty in the modern society in order
to convincingly argue that the war on poverty is the only noble war that mankind should fight
during their lifetime. Government and individuals fight contemporary wars for economic
strategies and self positioning while leaving the directly or indirectly affected casualties in dire
poverty.
Modern Poverty
household do not have the ability to purchase the basic commodities and services that are
fundamental for their survival in life. This condition forces the poor to use substandard things,
dwell in dilapidated neighborhoods, forgo proper medical care, spend days without food, lack
proper clothing, miss the opportunity to pursue basic or higher education and even struggle to lay
Surname 3
their hands on the cheapest luxuries that create boredom among the rich. In the modern day
America, more than 46.2 million people live. Accordingly, 10.9% of the males live in poverty
while women account for 14.6% of the poor Americans. The prevalence of poverty varies across
age groups, races, and geographical locations, but the poor remain the same regardless of the
social affiliations, and they need urgent measures that can help improve the quality of lives and
make the poor self sufficient and independent. There are clear cut differences between the
lifestyles of the poor and the rich or the middle class. The people who live in abject poverty
continue to suffer and miss opportunities that can enable them to rise the social ladder. If the war
against poverty is left unattended, the society continues to decay socially and morally while the
poor continue to undergo untold sufferings. Often, many people feel enraged and develop
The war against poverty is a just cause that focuses on stopping the sufferings that the
poor experience during their daily lives. For instance, empowering the poor will provide them
with adequate resources that can enable them to eat daily meals and seek proper medical care. In
addition, the poor will be in a position to seek basic and higher education that helps in reducing
the rate of poverty prevalence in the society. Several preventable deaths will be avoided when the
poor have unlimited access to sufficient food and medical care. For instance, thousands of
children die every year due to malnutrition while poor mothers die during delivery due to lack of
access to medical services. In certain circumstances, the poor are prompted to use hard drugs
because they hope to escape from the reality of poverty. In practice, higher literacy levels are
Surname 4
essential for the eradication of poverty in the society. Similarly, the poor who go to school and
graduate will be in a position to seek for employment and lead decent lives. Therefore, this
perspective shows that the fight against poverty will have positive impacts to both individuals
and society. For instance, the living standards of the poor will improve, and they will no longer
be dependent on the society to provide for their needs. On the other hand, the society will benefit
from a skilled and healthy labor force that can help in improving the economy of the country.
The government or the society will no longer have to provide freebees to the poor so that they
can channel such resources towards other activities. In addition, the rates if drug abuse and crime
will reduce when the poor have the chance to equal opportunities that can enable them to access
Secondly, every effort that is applied towards the fight against poverty will always result
in positive results. For instance, the chances of success are always guaranteed because there is no
possibility of failure. Regardless of the amount of funds dedicated towards the fight against
poverty, the recipients will always accept and appreciate the efforts of their neighbor, the society
or the government. During the process of improving the living standards of an individual, a
neighborhood or the society, there will be no casualties and efforts will result in positive changes,
in the lives of the targeted people. Unlike other wars where the probability of winning is
fifty-fifty, the war against poverty presents the people with automatic positive results. For
instance, the war against Iraq lasted for over ten years but brought undesired results to
Americans and Iraqis. This war dented the economy of America and left most people regretting
why they had supported the cause when it clearly had no meaning. On the other hand, the war led
to increased poverty in Iraq through thousands of civilian deaths, insecurity and destruction and
Surname 5
disruption of economic resources and activities. All the negative results occurred after the
country had spent billions of dollars to fight the losing war. However, in the war against poverty,
there are no losers since every participant is a winner. The effects that the war bring in the lives
of the poor are positive and long term since the poor get a chance to relive their lives decently
and happily. Therefore, the guaranteed success in the war against poverty coupled with its
inexpensive nature, short life and lacks of casualties makes this war a worthy war that every
nation, society or citizen must participate in to alleviate the living standard of their citizens
(Schweickart 476).
Stopping or ignoring the war against poverty does not make its spread stagnant. When the
war against poverty is stopped, more children are born poor, and the number of poor people
continues to increase tremendously. Accordingly, most of these children will grow in abject
poverty where majority will not survive past the age of five due to malnutrition. The few
numbers of surviving children will grow having no knowledge about equal opportunities thus
engage in social vices. For instance, the failure of these young children to find adequate food will
push them into peddling drugs, organized criminal activities, and prostitution among other vices
as they try to make a living. This cycle becomes vicious and continuous in the long term since
more children born in poverty join these activities to make end meet. Therefore, the society
continues to nurture immoral citizens who increase the rates of insecurity, prevalence of drug
abuse and prevalence of diseases such as Aids. Accordingly, the lack of war against poverty is
evidently expensive than waging a war against poverty. Fighting against poverty will enable the
government and society to put up with fewer criminals, drug peddlers, prostitutes and beggars
thus have the opportunity save the funds directed towards such activities. Therefore, this benefit
Surname 6
makes the war against poverty to be justifiable and worth fighting when compared to other
The war against poverty will result in equality and equitable distribution of national
resources and wealth. Today, only 1% of the elite population controls 45% of the total financial
resources in the country while the bottom 80% control a paltry 7% of the total resources
(Milanovic 116). These great disparities in the distribution of national resources should be
reconsidered so that more wealth can be availed to the poor. In the process of redistributing this
wealth, no rich person will die, become sick or have any misfortune. Instead, more people in the
economy will have reasonable wealth at their disposal so that they can use it to create more
wealth in the society. These people will be empowered to contribute to the economic and social
development of the society thus resulting in a highly competitive country where everybody has a
voice.
A successful fight against poverty will result in fewer impoverished people and several
happier citizens. In the modern world, a viable society must have a large number of vibrant and
healthy workers. Healthy people are often willing to work and drive the economy of the country
to a greater height. Healthiness increases the number of people who can help in reconstructing
the society through various activities. Therefore, eradication of poverty in any form can be
regarded as a positive step towards ensuring the overall wellbeing of all members of the
population. On the other hand, a society of when the majority of the citizens are poor, the
country will have unhealthy individuals who cannot take part in the nation building process
through various economic or social activities. Therefore, the fight against poverty can be
Surname 7
regarded as a war that benefits the whole society. Accordingly, the benefits that accrue from the
war against poverty make it a course that society can wage in order to enjoy the resulting
Fighting poverty increases the number of people who access basic and higher education.
Increased access to education guarantees higher levels of literacy in the society. Accordingly,
literate people are people who are well aware of their plight and can make rational decisions that
enable them to avoid steps that result into problems. For instance, literate people have formal
education about the main challenges that society and individuals face thus can help through the
elimination of these problems through right decisions (Smith 811). For instance, literate people
understand that overpopulation poses great risk to the society through competition for scarce
natural resources that leave other people or places poor. Therefore, these people will take the first
step towards family planning to help keep a check on population growth and so that
that use of drugs results in poverty for their families. For example, drugs are expensive and
addictive thus individuals will spend most of their income and resources in purchasing drugs thus
forcing their families into poverty. However, when these people receive formal education and
become literate, they shun these activities and instead look into ways that can help improve the
living standards of their families. Allowing more middle income and poor people to access basic
and higher education will increase the literacy levels in the society. In return, these people will be
able to understand behaviors or factors that lead to poverty (Soderberg and Brian 278).
Accordingly, they will make rational decisions of eliminating these factors so that they can
combat poverty at individual levels. Therefore, country should make education accessible to all
Surname 8
people so that these people can use their knowledge to wage war against poverty. The cost of
making education accessible is lower compared to the cost of providing food stamps that have
Poverty is a global challenge that continues to grow rapidly and to affect billions of
people around the world. For instance, current statistics estimate that over 1.4 billion people live
in poor conditions around different countries of the world. Most of these people come from the
underdeveloped and developing countries. The plight of these innocent human beings cannot be
ignored, and governments from the developed world must look into ways of helping these
nations end their poverty cycles. In practice efforts to end poverty in such countries have resulted
in dependency from these nations to countries such as the United States, Canada, United
Kingdom, Russia and China among others. The game should change; donors should stop
mitigating poverty and declare full war on the problem (Schweickart 481). Otherwise, the coffers
of the developed nations will continue to fund ineffective programs in the underdeveloped world
at the expense of their own citizens. The fight should be upgraded to incorporate methods that
fight to end poverty so that these countries can stop being dependent on other developed
countries. For instance, the United States is the biggest donor to the World Bank and the
international monetary fund. These funds are used to fight poverty in the developing countries.
However, the problem arises when the same donors are faced with challenges back at home.
Therefore, fighting the war of poverty in the developing world will mean that millions of people
get their basic needs whenever they need to satisfy their wants. Similarly, the nations from the
developed world will have an opportunity to redirect their donations and grants to other internal
programs that can help improve the lives of their citizens. Through such benefits, it is justifiable
Surname 9
for any nation to fight a wining war against poverty internally and externally so that they can
channel their grants and donations to internal development programs (Dedu, Gabriel and Dan
39).
With every effort that the government and individuals put in fighting poverty, the society
becomes a better place for dwelling. For instance, the number of beggars reduces on the streets,
and everybody has a source of livelihood. Similarly, the number of sick people who cannot
access medical care reduces and the society benefits from healthy and vibrant citizens who can
neighborhoods cease to exist, criminals find worthy activities, prostitute find equal opportunities
in moral employment while drug dealers find better means to become rich and nobody sleeps
without food due to insufficiency. Accordingly, a spirited fight against poverty can result in an
ideal world where people have no ill intentions against each other because they have something
better and rational to keep them busy. People will have nothing to worry about since the
surroundings will be full of individuals who have sufficient resources for their personal and
household needs. Therefore, these perfect benefits make war against poverty be worthy of
fighting.
In the war against poverty, the government bears the largest responsibility in ensuring
that the levels of poverty are drastically reduced in the society. Through economic growth
programs, the government can redefine the traditional methods of fighting poverty to more
effective techniques that will not encourage further growth of poverty. For instance, instead of
Surname 10
dismissing the poverty programs advocated for by the previous administrations, Ronald Reagan’s
and other subsequent administrations should have formulated programs that seek to empower the
power rather than provide them with food stamps and head starts (Milanovic 108). In addition,
the government should be ready to uphold the rule of law, secure the property rights of its
citizens, ensure increased access to education, provide safety to those who cannot cater for their
own security, and to create equal opportunities for all citizens. Cases of fraud, duplication of
efforts and inefficiencies should be eliminated in order to make poverty programs effective.
More funds should be channeled to programs that seek to empower people. For instance,
increasing access to education, providing loans to SMEs, and creation of equal opportunities can
go a long way in ending poverty instead of giving food stamps to the poor. The provision of such
basic needs should be considered as short term solutions and strategies to fight poverty. The
government should seek for more long term solutions that empower the people so that they can
also empower the next generation (Edwards 153). Therefore, in its effort to create an enabling
environment, the government will be giving the poor folks an opportunity to take charge of their
The negative emotions developed during discussions about poverty can be attributed to
the societal equation that equates wealth to success while equating poverty to lack of success and
the inability of an individual to take advantage of their destiny or future. The society must stop
treating poor people as people who suffer from a disease or illness and being lazy (Rose and
Frank 29). Instead, the society should exercise intolerance to factors or situations that encourage
Surname 11
poverty. In practice, all poor neighborhoods are lined with stores of liquor, controlled by drug
pushers, prostitutes and pimps. The society should gang up against these facilitating factors so
that they may not encourage the poor to drift further into deep poverty. More empowerment
programs should be formulated to aid government efforts in fighting poverty. The society has
access and close relations to the people who live in poverty (Patten 23). Similarly, the society has
knowledge about the main contributors of poverty. This vital information can be used to fight a
worthy war of ending poverty. For instance, the people identified as poor can be put in programs
that empower them to take control of their future. Drug addicts can be rehabilitated and trained
in casual jobs that can enable them to earn a decent living. On the other hand, activities such as
consumption of alcohol, prostitution, and violence among others promote poverty. Therefore, the
society can campaign against such practices and encourage people to practice worthy activities
that promote independence and self sufficiency among the people in the society.
Role of Individuals
The war against poverty cannot be successful without the blessings of individuals
especially those people considered being poor. Individuals must take the initiative and the first
step towards fighting poverty. Individuals must fight for their rights aggressively by embracing
the techniques that can help the come out of poverty. For instance, individuals must use their
scarce resources to increase their earnings instead of using such resources for liquor and drugs.
Individuals must seek formal education that can enable them to secure employment opportunities
in various sectors of the economy. Therefore, sitting back and waiting for food stamps and other
Surname 12
freebees does not help these people to overcome their plight. They must resort to acceptable
activities that allow them to earn income and grow economically (Patten 26).
Conclusion
With the passage of time, gap between the poor and the rich continues to widen beyond
unmanageable levels. Various stakeholders have stuck to inefficient strategies that only help in
enriching the people tasked to implement such programs while the poor continue to languish in
abject poverty. The fake and conceptual wars on drugs and wars on terror or the real wars against
Afghanistan and Iraq deny the society a chance to fight the only righteous war that has no
casualties or wastages bust success (Soderberg and Brian 275). With respect to the arguments
provided above, the government should no longer channels billions of funds and resources in
fighting other wars. Instead, a fraction of the same amounts can be effectively used to fight the
war on poverty within a short period and achieve the desired results. Waging an effective and
honest war against poverty goes a long way to bring numerous benefits to the government and
society. For instance, the government will save annual funds channeled to help the poor or to
fight challenges that thrive due to the existence of poverty. For instance, crime, prevalence of
diseases, prostitution and drug abuse will be drastically reduced thus the government will save
the funds directed towards this conceptual wars. On the other hand, the society will be a benefit
from a healthy workforce that has the necessary skills to ensure sustainable development in the
long term. Lastly, individual citizens will enjoy the natural resources and equal opportunity that
their countries can offer (Schweickart 473). Therefore, from the stand point of accruing benefits,
Surname 13
it is justifiable to conclude that the fight against poverty is the only real war that human beings
Works Cited
Dedu, Vasile, Gabriel Staicu, and Dan Costin Niţescu. "A Critical Examination Of Foreign Aid
Policy. Why It Fails To Eradicate Poverty?." Theoretical & Applied Economics 18.4
Edwards, John R. "Katrina's Lessons: Moving Forward In The Fight Against Poverty: An
Overview Of Panel Five." Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal 10.1 (2006):
Milanovic, Branko. "Why We All Care About Inequality (But Some Of Us Are Loathing
Admitting It)." Challenge (05775132) 50.6 (2007): 109-120. Business Source Complete.
Patten, Alan. "Should We Stop Thinking About Poverty In Terms Of Helping The Poor?" Ethics
& International Affairs (Wiley-Blackwell) 19.1 (2005): 19-27. Academic Search Premier.
Rose, Max, and Frank R. Baumgartner. "Framing the Poor: Media Coverage And U.S. Poverty
Policy, 1960-2008." Policy Studies Journal 41.1 (2013): 22-53. Business Source
Why." Journal of Social Philosophy 39.4 (2008): 471-491. Academic Search Premier.
Smith, Stephen C. "Freedom From Want: The Remarkable Success Story Of BRAC, The Global
Development & Cultural Change 58.4 (2010): 808-814. Business Source Complete. Web.
4 May 2013.
Soderberg, Nancy, and Brian Katulis. "Why The Next President Should Focus On A Prosperity
Agenda." American Foreign Policy Interests 30.5 (2008): 275-280. Academic Search