Btsfa Case: G.R. NO. 139843. July 21, 2005 Gualberto, Et. Al. vs. Go, Et. Al
Btsfa Case: G.R. NO. 139843. July 21, 2005 Gualberto, Et. Al. vs. Go, Et. Al
Btsfa Case: G.R. NO. 139843. July 21, 2005 Gualberto, Et. Al. vs. Go, Et. Al
FACTS
ISSUES
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
TESIMONIAL EVIDENCE
xxx. Generally, an action for reconveyance based on an implied or constructive trust, such as the instant
case, prescribes in 10 years from the date of issuance of decree of registration. However, this rule does
not apply when the plaintiff is in actual possession of the land. Thus, it has been held:
". . . [A]n action for reconveyance of a parcel of land based on implied or constructive trust prescribes in
ten years, the point of reference being the date of registration of the deed or the date of the issuance of
the certificate of title over the property, but this rule applies only when the plaintiff or the person
enforcing the trust is not in possession of the property, since if a person claiming to be the owner
thereof is in actual possession of the property, as the defendants are in the instant case, the right to
seek reconveyance, which in effect seeks to quiet title to the property, does not prescribe. The reason
for this is that one who is in actual possession of a piece of land claiming to be the owner thereof may
wait until his possession is disturbed or his title is attacked before taking steps to vindicate his right, the
reason for the rule being, that his undisturbed possession gives him a continuing right to seek the aid of
a court of equity to ascertain and determine the nature of the adverse claim of a third party and its
effect on his own title, which right can be claimed only by one who is in possession."
G.R. No. 129471. April 28, 2000 DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. COURT OF
APPEALS and CARLOS CAJES as cited in G.R. NO. 139843. July 21, 2005 Gualberto, et. al.
vs. Go, et. al.
https://www.chanrobles.com/scdecisions/jurisprudence2005/jul2005/139843.php
https://www.chanrobles.com/scdecisions/jurisprudence2005/jul2005/139843.php
Notwithstanding the indefeasibility of the Torrens title, the registered owner can still be compelled
under the law to reconvey the property registered to the rightful owner16 under the principle that the
property registered is deemed to be held in trust for the real owner by the person in whose name it is
registered.17 The party seeking to recover title to property wrongfully registered in another person’s
name must file an action for reconveyance within the allowed period of time.
An action for reconveyance based on an implied or constructive trust prescribes in ten (10) years from
the issuance of the Torrens title over the property.18 There is, however, an exception to this rule where
the filing of such action does not prescribe, i.e. when the plaintiff is in possession of the subject
property, the action, being in effect that of quieting of title to the property, does not prescribe.19
In the present case, the respondents, who are the plaintiffs in Civil Case No. 18421 (the action
for annulment and cancellation of title filed in 2013), have always been in possession of the
subject property. Worth noting are the CA’s findings on this respect:
On the other hand, the continuous possession of the subject premises by the plaintiffs-appellees has not
been denied or disputed by the defendants-appellants (sic).The possession in the concept of an owner
by the plaintiffs-appellees has also been confirmed by witness Charlie Martin.20 (Emphasis ours)
Considering that the action for annulment and cancellation of title filed by the respondents is
substantially in the nature of an action for reconveyance based on an implied or constructive trust,
combined with the fact that the respondents have always been in possession of the subject property, we
shall treat Civil Case No. 18421 as an action to quiet title, the filing of which does not prescribe.
G.R. No. 195443 September 17, 2014 JUANARIO G. CAMPIT vs. ISIDRA B. GRIP A, PEDRO BARDIAGA, and
SEVERINO BARDIAGA, represented by his son ROLANDO BARDIAGA, Respondents.
https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2014/sep2014/gr_195443_2014.html#fnt17