AASHTO - Rigid Pavement Design

Note 1: Click CTRL+j on your keyboard before using this spreadsheet in EXCEL97.
Note 2: Due to different monitor, EXCEL, and fonts capabilities on different computers, the text on some of the
sheets may be truncated. It may be necessary to unprotect the sheet and resize some of the columns.
Note 3: This spreadsheet needs to be copied to the hard drive to be used. It cannot be run off a floppy drive.
Note 4: Figures accompanying the text are scanned into the spreadsheet. For clarity of these figures it may be
useful to print these pages and use the printed figures.
I. Input Sheet - General Information
l The general information section requests information about the agency. This
information is not required for the analysis, but the information entered here
may be displayed on the "Results" sheet.
II. Input Sheet - Design Information
l All design inputs are required except sensitivity analysis.

No default values are used.
l Information can be retrieved from the "Saved Data" sheet using the "Retrieve Data"
button. The existing data can be replaced or saved as a new set using the
"Save Data" button.
Clicking on the "Retrieve Data" button opens the "Saved Data" sheet. Select the
appropriate row to be retrieved and click on the "Export" button.
If the retrieval is successful, the data are retreived. Changes can be made and saved
as a new data set using a different value for the search ID. The data can also
be overwritten using the same search ID. The search value can be text, numbers, or a
combination of the two that uniquely identifies the data (example: Project Numbers).
This feature can also be used to save a default set of values.
Using the "Clear All" ID to retrieve the "Clear All" data set clears all the data in
the spreadsheet.
l Design information such as initial and terminal serviceability, concrete properties, base
properties, and reliability and standard deviation can be input in the appropriate cells.
Table 14 provides help for estimating base property values.
Climatic properties such as wind, temperature, and precipitation, which are required for
positive temperature differential calculation, can be estimated using the table of climatic
properties for major cities provided in table 15.
A pavement type can be selected by clicking the option buttons provided. For JPCP and
JRCP, the joint spacing needs to be entered in ft in the space provided. This
automatically calculates the effective joint spacing to be used in design.
l Edge support can also be selected using the option buttons provided. This
automatically calculates the edge support factor to be used in design.
l A first run MUST be performed using design inputs for all variables and using an
estimated effective subgrade k-value. This determines an approximate slab thickness
for the inputs provided. The user can then navigate to the seasonal k-value calculation
sheet (and, if necessary, the "Fill/Rigid Layer" sheet) to calculate the k-value adjusted for
the effects of season and presence of fill section or rigid layer beneath the pavement.
(The approximate slab thickness obtained from the first run is used in calculating the damage
during different seasons of the year.)
Approximately 3 to 4 iterations will be required (i.e., after a first run with a trial k-value,
a trial thickness is obtained). The "Calculate seasonal k-value" button can then be used to
calculate a seasonally adjusted k-value. This is exported back to the "Input Form" sheet.
The slab thickness is calculated again using the new k-value. This changes the seasonal
adjusted k-value and the procedure need to be repeated again. This is done till the
change in thickness does not change the seasonally adjusted k-value.
Detailed information on k-value is provided in the "k-Value Information" Sheet.
Page 1
l A traffic calculation should be performed before the first run. This will result in
a more appropriate slab thickness for the seasonal k-value computation.
l After all the design information has been entered, clicking on the "Calculate" button
displays the design thickness at the bottom of the Input Form.
The above calculation is performed in the "Calculation Sheet" sheet. The "Calculation Sheet"
also provides the design traffic for slab thicknesses varying from 7 in to 15 inches, in increments
of 0.5 in. The next row is not locked, to enable the user to change any variable and
observe its effects on the design traffic. The last row is locked and represents the thickness
for the traffic and other inputs provided by the user in the Input Form.
l Sensitivity analysis can also be performed from the Input Form. A desired thickness
can be input, or the calculated thickness for the input design variable can be imported.
The sensitivity analysis produces a graph on a sheet labeled "Sensitivity (Other)."
The sensitivity for thickness vs. traffic is created automatically on the
"Sensitivity (Thickness)" sheet.
The actual data for the sensitivity analysis is contained in a sheet called "Sensitivity Sheet;"
this sheet is hidden.
l The Input Form also contains a link to the "Faulting Check" sheet for JRCP and
JPCP. For CRCP, the "Faulting Check" sheet and the "Corner Break Check" sheet
remain hidden.
l Red dots or flags at the top right corners of cells indicate that a note is attached to that cell.
This note can be read by moving the mouse over that cell.
NOTE: This spreadsheet was created in Excel95. Due to compatibility problems with Excel97,
the larger notes are partially cut off (because Excel97 displays notes with fixed sizes as default).
To see the entire note, a macro is written in this spreadsheet to change the size of notes
that are bigger than the comment box (The notes in Excel97 are now called comments).
However, the user must run this macro by pressing "ctrl+j" each time the spreadsheet is
opened in Excel97. This command does not affect spreadsheets in Excel95.
l Certain cells are locked to prevent accidental erasure. Cells can only be locked when the
sheet is also protected, so some sheets are protected. To unprotect a sheet, go to Tools
on the menu, select Protection and select Unprotect Sheet. This creates the potential
for accidental erasure, so it is useful to keep the sheet protected. To reprotect the
sheet, select Tools, Protection, Protect Sheet and select OK without entering a password.
The workbook should not be protected because some of the Excel basic programs (macros)
need the workbook to be unprotected to be executed.
For the same reason, the "Sensitivity Sheet" (which is hidden) and the "Saved Data"
sheet should not be protected. Hidden sheets can be viewed by using Format, Sheet, Unhide,
or Edit, Sheet, Unhide from the menu.
III. Faulting Check Sheet
l For jointed pavements, the Input Form links to the "Faulting Check" sheet. All cells
need to be input in this sheet. The cells that do not need to be input are hidden using
the outlining ("+") at the left of the sheet. To observe the values at this location, the sheet has
to be unprotected and the "+" clicked.
Each time a cell value is changed, the "Calculate" button needs to be clicked to calculate
faulting, which is displayed at the bottom of the sheet. This is then compared with the criteria
set at the bottom of the sheet to "PASS" or "FAIL" the design.
The criteria can be changed by changing the values in the criteria table.
l The doweled and nondoweled sheets are designed independent of each other to provide
the user control over the individual design. For example, the user may decide to provide
edgedrains for the nondoweled design, which will change the drainage coefficient, Cd.
l While making a one-on-one comparison between the faulting check for the doweled and
nondoweled designs, the user needs to ensure that all values are comparable.
l Corner break checks need to be performed only for nondoweled pavements. This sheet
Page 2
can be accessed by clicking on the "Corner Break Check" button.
Page 3
Table 14. Modulus of elasticity and coefficient of friction for various base types.
Base Type or Modulus of Peak Friction Coefficient

Interface Treatment Elasticity low mean high
(psi)
Fine-grained soil 3,000 - 40,000 0.5 1.3 2.0
Sand 10,000 - 25,000 0.5 0.8 1.0
Aggregate 15,000 - 45,000 0.7 1.4 2.0
Polyethylene sheeting NA 0.5 0.6 1.0
Lime-stabilized clay 20,000 - 70,000 3.0 NA 5.3
Cement-treated gravel (500 + CS) * 1000 8.0 34 63
Asphalt-treated gravel 300,000 - 600,000 3.7 5.8 10
Lean concrete without (500 + CS) * 1000 > 36
curing compound
Lean concrete with single (500 + CS) * 1000 3.5 4.5
or double wax curing
compound
Notes: CS = compressive strength, psi

Low, mean, and high measured peak coefficients of friction summarized from various references
are shown above.
Page 4
Fine-Grained Subgrade Coarse-Grained Subgrade
Edge Precip.
Drains Level
Nonpermeable Permeable Nonpermeable Permeable
Base Base Base Base
No Wet 0.70-0.90 0.85-0.95 0.75-0.95 0.90-1.00

Dry 0.90-1.10 0.95-1.10 0.90-1.15 1.00-1.15
Yes Wet 0.75-0.95 1.00-1.10 0.90-1.10 1.05-1.15
Dry 0.95-1.15 1.10-1.20 1.10-1.20 1.15-1.20
Notes: 1. Fine subgrade = A-1 through A-3 classes;

Coarse subgrade = A-4 through A-8 classes.
2. Permeable Base = k = 1000 ft/day (305 m/day) or uniformity coefficient (Cu)  6.
3. Wet climate = Precipitation > 25 in/year (635 mm/year);
Dry climate = Precipitation  25 in/year (635 mm/year).
4. Select midpoint of range and use other drainage features (adequacy of cross slopes, depth of
ditches, presence of daylighting, relative drainability of base course, bathtub design, etc.) to adjust upward
or downward.
Page 5
Table 15. Mean annual temperature, precipitation, and wind speed for selected U.S. cities.
Mean Annual Wind Speed, mph

Mean Annual Temperature, °F

Mean Annual Precipitation, in

Location Location Location
ALABAMA KANSAS OKLAHOMA

Birmingham 62.2 52.2 7.2 Topeka 54.1 28.6 10.1 Oklahoma City 59.9 30.9 12.5
Mobile 67.5 64.6 9.0 Wichita 56.4 40.1 12.3 Tulsa 60.3 38.8 10.4
Montgomery 67.5 49.2 6.7 KENTUCKY OREGON
ALASKA Lexington 54.9 45.7 7.1 Medford 53.6 19.8 4.8
Anchorage 35.3 15.2 6.9 Louisville 56.2 43.6 8.3 Portland 53.0 37.4 7.9
Fairbanks 25.9 10.4 5.5 LOUISIANA Salem 52.0 40.4 7.0
King Salmon 32.8 19.3 10.8 Baton Rouge 67.5 55.8 7.7 PENNSYLVANIA
ARIZONA Lake Charles 68.0 53.0 8.6 Harrisburg 53.0 39.1 7.6
Flagstaff 45.4 20.9 7.1 New Orleans 68.2 59.7 8.2 Philadelphia 54.3 41.4 9.5
Phoenix 71.2 7.1 6.3 Shreveport 65.4 43.8 8.5 Pittsburgh 50.3 36.3 9.1
Tucson 68.0 11.1 8.2 MAINE RHODE ISLAND
ARKANSAS Caribou 38.9 36.6 11.2 Providence 50.3 45.3 10.6
Little Rock 61.9 49.2 7.9 Portland 45.0 43.8 8.7 SOUTH CAROLINA
CALIFORNIA MARYLAND Charleston 64.8 51.6 8.7
Bakersfield 65.6 5.7 6.4 Baltimore 55.1 41.8 9.2 Columbia 63.3 49.1 6.9
Fresno 62.5 10.5 6.4 MASSACHUSETTS SOUTH DAKOTA
Los Angeles 62.6 12.1 7.5 Boston 51.5 43.8 12.4 Huron 44.7 18.7 11.6
Sacramento 60.6 17.1 8.1 Worcester 46.8 47.6 12.4 Rapid City 46.7 16.3 11.3
San Diego 63.8 9.3 6.9 MICHIGAN TENNESSEE
San Francisco 56.6 19.7 10.5 Detroit 48.6 4.0 10.2 Chattanooga 59.4 52.6 6.1
Santa Barbara 58.9 16.2 6.1 Flint 46.8 29.2 10.6 Knoxville 58.9 47.3 7.1
COLORADO Grand Rapids 47.5 34.4 9.7 Memphis 61.8 51.6 9.0
Colorado Spring 48.9 15.4 10.1 MINNESOTA Nashville 59.2 48.5 8.0
Denver 50.3 15.3 8.8 Duluth 38.2 29.7 11.2 TEXAS
CONNECTICUT Minneapolis 44.7 26.4 10.6 Amarillo 57.2 19.1 13.6
Hartford 49.8 44.4 9.2 MISSISSIPPI Brownsville 73.6 25.4 11.6
DC Jackson 64.6 52.8 7.4 Corpus Christi 72.1 30.2 12.0
Washington 57.5 39.0 9.3 MISSOURI Dallas 66.0 29.5 10.8
DELAWARE Kansas City 56.3 35.2 10.7 El Paso 63.4 7.8 9.0
Wilmington 54.0 41.4 9.2 MONTANA Galveston 69.6 40.2 11.0
FLORIDA Great Falls 44.7 15.2 12.8 Houston 68.3 44.8 7.8
Jacksonville 68.0 52.8 8.1 NEBRASKA Lubbock 59.9 17.8 12.4
Miami 75.6 57.6 9.2 Omaha 49.5 29.9 10.6 Midland 63.5 13.7 11.1
Orlando 72.4 47.8 8.6 NEVADA San Antonio 68.7 29.2 9.4
Tallahassee 67.2 64.6 6.4 Las Vegas 66.3 4.2 9.2 Waco 67.0 31.0 11.3
Tampa 72.0 46.7 8.5 Reno 49.4 7.5 6.5 Wichita Falls 63.5 26.7 11.7
West Palm Beac 74.6 59.7 9.4 NEW JERSEY UTAH
GEORGIA Atlantic City 53.1 41.9 10.1 Salt Lake City 51.7 15.3 8.8
Atlanta 61.2 48.6 9.1 NEW MEXICO VERMONT
Augusta 63.2 43.1 6.5 Albuquerque 56.2 8.1 9.0 Burlington 44.1 33.7 8.8
Macon 64.7 44.9 7.7 NEW YORK VIRGINIA
Page 6
Savannah 65.9 49.7 7.9 Albany 47.3 35.7 8.9 Norfolk 59.5 45.2 10.6
HAWAII Buffalo 47.6 37.5 12.1 Richmond 57.7 44.1 7.6
Hilo 73.6 128.2 7.1 New York City 54.5 44.1 12.1 Roanoke 56.1 39.2 8.2
Honolulu 77.0 23.5 11.5 Rochester 47.9 31.3 9.7 WASHINGTON
IDAHO Syracuse 47.7 39.1 9.7 Olympia 49.6 51.0 6.7
Boise 51.1 11.7 8.8 NORTH CAROLINA Seattle 52.7 38.8 9.0
Pocatello 46.6 10.9 10.2 Charlotte 60.0 43.2 7.5 Spokane 47.2 16.7 8.8
ILLINOIS Greensboro 57.9 42.5 7.5 WEST VIRGINIA
Chicago 49.2 33.3 10.2 Raleigh 59.0 41.8 7.8 Charleston 54.8 42.4 6.4
Peoria 50.4 34.9 10.1 Wilmington 63.4 53.4 8.8 Huntington 55.2 40.7 6.5
Springfield 52.6 33.8 11.3 NORTH DAKOTA WISCONSIN
INDIANA Bismarck 41.3 15.4 10.3 Green Bay 43.6 28.0 10.1
Evansville 55.7 41.6 8.2 Fargo 40.5 19.6 12.4 Madison 45.2 30.8 9.8
Fort Wayne 49.7 34.4 10.1 OHIO Milwaukee 46.1 30.9 11.6
Indianapolis 52.1 39.1 9.6 Akron-Canton 49.5 35.9 9.8 WYOMING
South Bend 49.4 38.2 10.4 Cleveland 49.6 35.4 10.7 Casper 45.2 11.4 13.0
IOWA Columbus 51.7 37.0 8.7 Cheyenne 45.7 13.3 12.9
Des Moines 49.7 30.8 10.9 Dayton 51.9 34.7 10.1
Sioux City 48.4 25.4 11.0 Youngstown 48.3 37.3 10.0
Waterloo 46.1 33.1 10.7
°C =(°F - 32)/1.8, 1 in = 25.4 mm, 1 mph = 1.61 km/h Source: National Climatic Data Center, 1986
Page 7
Rigid Pavement Design - Based on AASHTO Supplemental Guide
Reference: LTPP DATA ANALYSIS - Phase I: Validation of Guidelines for k-Value Selection and Concrete
Pavement Performance Prediction
I. General
Agency:
Street Address:
City:
State:
Project Number: ID: Clear
Description:
Location:
II. Design
Pavement Type, Joint Spacing (L)
Serviceability
● JPCP
Initial Serviceability, P1: 56.0 Joint Spacing:
Terminal Serviceability, P2: 35.0
JRCP ft
PCC Properties
CRCP
28-day Mean Modulus of Rupture, (S'c)': 50 psi JPCP
Elastic Modulus of Slab, Ec: 35 psi
Poisson's Ratio for Concrete, m: 0.15 Effective Joint Spacing: 0 in
Base Properties Edge Support
Elastic Modulus of Base, Eb: psi Conventional 12-ft wide traffic lane
Design Thickness of Base, Hb: in
Slab-Base Friction Factor, f: Conventional 12-ft wide traffic lane + tied PCC
Reliability and Standard Deviation 2-ft widened slab w/conventional 12-ft traffic lane
Reliability Level (R): % Edge Support Factor: 1.00

Overall Standard Deviation, S0:
Sensitivity Analysis
Climatic Properties
Slab Thickness used for
Mean Annual Wind Speed, WIND: mph Sensitivity Analysis: 11.24 in
o
Mean Annual Air Temperature, TEMP: F
Mean Annual Precipitation, PRECIP: in Modulus of Rupture Elastic Modulus (Slab)
Subgrade k-Value
Elastic Modulus (Base) Base Thickness
psi/in
k-Value Joint Spacing
Design ESALs
million Reliability Standard Deviation
Calculated Slab Thickness for Above Inputs: in

Rigid Pavement Design - Based on AASHTO Supplemental Guide
Reference: LTPP DATA ANALYSIS - Phase I: Validation of Guidelines for k-Value Selection and Concrete
Pavement Performance Prediction
Results
Project # 0
Description: 0
Location: 0
Slab Thickness Design
Pavement Type JPCP

18-kip ESALs Over Initial Performance Period (million) million
Initial Serviceability 56
Terminal Serviceability 35
28-day Mean PCC Modulus of Rupture 50 psi
Elastic Modulus of Slab 35 psi
Elastic Modulus of Base psi
Base Thickness in.
Mean Effective k-Value psi/in
Reliability Level %
Overall Standard Deviation
Calculated Design Thickness in
Temperature Differential
Mean Annual Wind Speed mph

o
Mean Annual Air Temperature F
Mean Annual Precipitation in
o
Maximum Positive Temperature Differential F
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Period Description Subgrade k-Value, psi

Seasonally Adjusted Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 165 psi/in
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction Adjusted for Rigid Layer

and Fill Section 0 psi/in
Traffic
Performance Period 0 years

Two-Way ADT 0
Number of Lanes in Design Direction 0
Percent of All Trucks in Design Lane 0%
Percent Trucks in Design Direction 0%
Vehicle Class Percent of Annual Initial Annual Accumulated

ADT Growth Truck Factor Growth in 18-kip ESALs
Truck Factor (millions)
Total Calculated Cumulative ESALs million
Faulting
Doweled
Dowel Diameter in
Drainage Coefficient
Average Fault for Design Years with Design Inputs in

Criteria Check
Nondoweled
Drainage Coefficient
Average Fault for Design Years with Design Inputs in

Criteria Check
Calculation Sheet
D Design Traffic L E l F Term1 Term2 Term3 Term4

(in) MESALs in in
7.0 #VALUE! 1.00 ### #VALUE! -1.94 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

#VALUE! #VALUE! 1.00 ### #VALUE! -1.94 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Page 11
Calculation Sheet
Term5 Term6 Term7 log b b TD sl st ' L E l

o
F psi psi in in
#VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 180 1.00 32.65
#VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! 180 1.00 #VALUE!
Page 12
Calculation Sheet
F Term1 Term2 Term3 Term4 Term5 Term6 Term7 log b b TD

o
F
1.10 -1.94 0.49 0.51 -0.17 0.09 -0.18 -0.23 -1.44 0.0362 6.16
1.10 -1.94 0.50 0.48 -0.16 0.09 -0.19 -0.21 -1.44 0.0367 6.69
1.09 -1.94 0.51 0.46 -0.15 0.08 -0.20 -0.19 -1.43 0.0370 7.15
1.08 -1.94 0.51 0.44 -0.14 0.08 -0.20 -0.17 -1.43 0.0373 7.56
1.08 -1.94 0.52 0.42 -0.13 0.08 -0.21 -0.16 -1.43 0.0374 7.92
1.07 -1.94 0.53 0.40 -0.13 0.07 -0.21 -0.15 -1.43 0.0375 8.24
1.07 -1.94 0.53 0.39 -0.12 0.07 -0.22 -0.14 -1.43 0.0375 8.53
1.06 -1.94 0.54 0.37 -0.11 0.07 -0.22 -0.13 -1.43 0.0375 8.79
1.05 -1.94 0.55 0.36 -0.11 0.07 -0.23 -0.12 -1.43 0.0375 9.03
1.05 -1.94 0.55 0.35 -0.10 0.06 -0.23 -0.11 -1.43 0.0374 9.25
1.04 -1.94 0.56 0.34 -0.10 0.06 -0.24 -0.10 -1.43 0.0373 9.45
1.03 -1.94 0.56 0.33 -0.10 0.06 -0.24 -0.10 -1.43 0.0372 9.64
1.03 -1.94 0.57 0.32 -0.09 0.06 -0.25 -0.09 -1.43 0.0371 9.81
1.02 -1.94 0.58 0.31 -0.09 0.06 -0.25 -0.09 -1.43 0.0370 9.96
1.02 -1.94 0.58 0.30 -0.08 0.05 -0.26 -0.08 -1.43 0.0369 10.11
1.01 -1.94 0.59 0.29 -0.08 0.05 -0.26 -0.08 -1.43 0.0367 10.25
1.00 -1.94 0.59 0.29 -0.08 0.05 -0.27 -0.07 -1.44 0.0366 10.37
1.05 -1.94 0.55 0.36 -0.11 0.07 -0.23 -0.12 -1.43 0.0375 9.03
#VALUE! -1.94 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Page 13
Calculation Sheet
sl st L1 L2 log R G Y log W log W' W'(50%) Z

psi psi kips MESALs
284.6 384.1 18 1 6.58 0.845 1.37 7.20 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

#VALUE! #VALUE! 18 1 #VALUE! 0.845 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Page 14
Calculation Sheet
W 18 R log W 18 R D = A0 + A1 log W18 R

MESALS
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE! A0 = #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE! A1 = #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE! R2 = #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE! Stand Err of X = #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE! 11.239818182202
Page 15
Sensitivity Analysis (Effective Subgrade Support)
12.0
Design Traffic, MESALs
Modulus of
Rupture = 650 psi
Elastic Modulus of
Concrete =
10.0 4,200,000 psi
Elastic Modulus of
Base = 25,000 psi
8.0
Base Thickness = 6
in
k-Value of
6.0 subgrade = 50 to
800 psi
Joint Spacing = 15 ft
4.0 Reliability = 90 %
Standard Deviation
= 0.34
2.0
Slab Thickness =
11.74 in
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
k-value, psi
Sensitivity Analysis (Thickness)
10
Design Traffic, MESALs
1
7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0
Slab Thickness, in
Faulting
DOWELED PAVEMENT NONDOWELED PAVEMENT
Dowel Diameter: in
Kd: 1,500,000 psi/in ###
Es: 29,000,000 psi ###
Base/Slab Frictional Restraint
Stabilized Base
● Aggregate Base or LCB w/ bond breaker
ALPHA: 6E-06 /oF ###

o
TRANGE: F Days90: days
e: 0.00015 strain ###
D: in D: in
P: 9,000 lbf ###
T: 0.45 ###
Base Type Base Type
Stabilized Base Stabilized Base
● Unstabilized Base Unstabilized Base
o o
FI: F-days FI: F-days
CESAL: million CESAL: million
Age: years Age: years D
Cd: Cd: ###
###
Faulting (doweled) Faulting (nondoweled) ND

###
in in ###
Faulting Check - Faulting Check -
Recommended critical mean joint faulting levels for design (Table 28)
Joint Spacing Critical Mean Joint Faulting

< 25 ft 0.06 in
> 25 ft 0.13 in
Note: Joint load position stress checks need to be performed only for nondoweled pavements
Only two numbers need to be entered in this sheet:

Temperature gradient
Tensile stress at top of slab
Step 1:
Total Negative Temperature Differential
Slab Thickness: in
o
Total Negative Temperature Differential: F
Construction Curling and Moisture Gradient Temperature Differential
o
Enter temperature gradient: F/in (enter positive value from below)
For temperature gradient use:
Wet Climate: 0 to 2 oF/in (Annual Precipitation >= 30 in or

Thornthwaite Moisture Index > 0)
Dry Climate: 1 to 3 oF/in (Annual Precipitation < 30 in or

Thornthwaite Moisture Index < 0)
o
Total Effective Negative Temp. Differential: F
Step 2:
Use one or more of the following charts to estimate the tensile stress at top of slab.
Note that the charts show the variation of tensile stress with negative temperature differential
for slab thicknesses ranging from 7 to 13 in. These are plotted for a base course thickness
of 6 in. The six charts represent three k-values (100, 250 and 500 psi/in) and two values for the
elastic modulus of the base (25,000 psi and 1,000,000 psi). Use judgment to
extrapolate the value of the tensile stress at the top of the slab from these charts.
Enter Tensile Stress at Top of Slab: psi (use charts below)

Step 3:
Compare the above tensile stress with the maximum tensile stress at the bottom of the slab for
which the slab is designed. For the given inputs and the above thickness, this value is
psi
The slab is designed for a tensile stress of psi.

If the tensile stress at the top of the slab (obtained from the charts below and entered above) is
less than the design stress, the design is acceptable. If the check fails, new inputs have to be provided.
Corner Break Check:

NOTE: The k-value used in this design procedure is not a composite k, as in the original AASHTO
design procedure. The k-value to be input in the "Input Form" and in the "Seasonal k-Value" sheet
is the actual subgrade soil modulus of subgrade reaction.
The k-value input required for this design method is determined using the following steps:
Step 1. Select a subgrade soil k-value for each season, using any of the three following methods:
(a) Correlations with soil type and other soil properties or tests.
(b) Deflection testing and backcalculation (recommended).
(c) Plate bearing tests.
Detailed information for Step 1 is included below.
Step 2. The "Seasonal k-Value" Sheet can then be used to determine a seasonally adjusted
effective k-value.
Step 3. This seasonally adjusted effective k-value can then be adjusted for the effects of
a shallow rigid layer, if present, or an embankment above the natural subgrade using the
"Fill/Rigid Adjustment" sheet.
Method A -- Correlations. Guidelines are presented for selecting an appropriate k-value based
on soil classification, moisture level, density, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), or Dynamic Cone
Penetrometer (DCP) data. These correlation methods are anticipated to be used routinely for
design. The k-values obtained from soil type or tests correlation methods may need to be
adjusted for embankment above the subgrade or a shallow rigid layer beneath the subgrade.
The k-values and correlations for cohesive soils (A-4 through A-7): The bearing capacity of
cohesive soils is strongly influenced by their degree of saturation (S r, percent), which is a function
3
of water content (w, percent), dry density (g, lb/ft ), and specific gravity (Gs):
Recommended k-values for each fine-grained soil type as a function of degree of saturation are
shown in Figure 40. Each line represents the middle of a range of reasonable values for k. For
any given soil type and degree of saturation, the range of values is about + 40 psi/in [11 kPa/mm].
A reasonable lower limit for k at 100 percent saturation is considered to be 25 psi/in [7 kPa/mm ].
Thus, for example, an A-6 soil might be expected to exhibit k-values between about 180 and 260
psi/in [49 and 70 kPa/mm] at 50 percent saturation, and k-values between about 25 and 85 psi/in
[7 and 23 kPa/mm] at 100 percent saturation.
Two different types of materials can be classified as A-4: predominantly silty materials (at least 75
percent passing the #200 sieve, possibly organic), and mixtures of silt, sand, and gravel (up to 64
percent retained on #200 sieve). The former may have a density between about 90 and 105 lb/ft 3
[1442 and 1682 kg/m3], and a CBR between about 4 and 8. The latter may have a density
between about 100 and 125 lb/ft3 [1602 and 2002 kg/m3], and a CBR between about 5 and 15.
The line labeled A-4 in Figure B-4 is more representative of the former group. If the material in
question is A-4, but possesses the properties of the stronger subset of materials in the A-4 class,
a higher k-value at any given degree of saturation (for example, along the line labeled A-7-6 in
Figure 40) is appropriate.
Recommended k-value ranges for fine-grained soils, along with typical ranges of dry density and
CBR for each soil type, are summarized in Table 11.
The k -values and correlations for cohesionless soils (A-1 and A-3): The bearing capacity of
cohesionless materials is fairly insensitive to moisture variation and is predominantly a function of
their void ratio and overall stress state. Recommended k-value ranges for cohesionless soils,
along with typical ranges of dry density and CBR for each soil type, are summarized in Table 11.
Figure 40. The k-value versus degree of saturation for cohesive soils
Table 11. Recommended k-value ranges for various soil types.
AASHTO Description Unified Dry CBR k Value

Class Class Density (perce (psi/in)
(lb/ft3) nt)
Coarse-grained Soils:
A-1-a, well graded 125 - 140 60 - 80 300 - 450

gravel GW, GP
A-1-a, poorly graded 120 - 130 35 - 60 300 - 400
A-1-b coarse sand SW 110 - 130 20 - 40 200 - 400
A-3 fine sand SP 105 - 120 15 - 25 150 - 300
A-2 Soils (granular materials with high fines):
A-2-4, gravelly silty gravel GM 130 - 145 40 - 80 300 - 500
A-2-5, gravelly silty sandy gravel
A-2-4, sandy silty sand SM 120 - 135 20 - 40 300 - 400
A-2-5, sandy silty gravelly sand
A-2-6, gravelly clayey gravel GC 120 - 140 20 - 40 200 - 450
A-2-7, gravelly clayey sandy gravel
A-2-6, sandy clayey sand

SC 105 - 130 10 - 20 150 - 350
A-2-7, sandy clayey gravelly

sand
Fine-grained Soils:
silt 90 - 105 4-8 25 - 165 *

A-4 ML, OL
silt/sand/ 100 - 125 5 - 15 40 - 220 *

gravel mixture
A-5 poorly graded MH 80 - 100 4-8 25 - 190 *

silt
A-6 plastic clay CL 100 - 125 5 - 15 25 - 255 *
A-7-5 moderately plastic CL, OL 90 - 125 4 - 15 25 - 215 *

elastic clay
A-7-6 highly plastic CH, OH 80 - 110 3-5 40 - 220 *

elastic clay
* k-value of fine-grained soil is highly dependent on degree of saturation. See Figure 40.
These recommended k-value ranges apply to a homogeneous soil layer at least 10 ft [3 m] thick. If an
embankment layer less than 10 ft [3 m] thick exists over a softer subgrade, the k-value for the underlying
soil should be estimated from this table and adjusted for the type and thickness of embankment material
using Step 3. If a layer of bedrock exists within 10 ft [3 m] of the top of the soil, the k should be adjusted
using Step 3. 1 lb/ft3 =16.018 kg/m3, 1 psi/in = 0.271 kPa/mm
The k-values and correlations for A-2 soils: Soils in the A-2 class are all granular materials
falling between A-1 and A-3. Although it is difficult to predict the behavior of such a wide variety of
materials, the available data indicate that in terms of bearing capacity, A-2 materials behave
similarly to cohesionless materials of comparable density. Recommended k-value ranges for A-2
soils, along with typical ranges of dry density and CBR for each soil type, are summarized in
Table 11.
Correlation of k-value to California Bearing Ratio: Figure 41 illustrates the approximate range
of k-values that might be expected for a soil with a given CBR.
Correlation of k-values to penetration rate by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer: Figure 42

illustrates the range of k-values that might be expected for a soil with a given penetration rate
(inches per blow) measured with a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. This is a rapid hand-held testing
device that can be used to quickly test dozens of locations along an alignment. The DCP can also
penetrate AC surfaces and surface treatments to test the foundation below.
Assignment of k-values to seasons. Among the factors that should be considered in selecting
seasonal k-values are the seasonal movement of the water table, seasonal precipitation levels,
winter frost depths, number of freeze-thaw cycles, and the extent to which the subgrade will be
protected from frost by embankment material. A "frozen" k may not be appropriate for winter,
even in a cold climate, if the frost will not reach and remain in a substantial thickness of the
subgrade throughout the winter. If it is anticipated that a substantial depth (e.g., three feet or
more) of the subgrade will be frozen, a k-value of 500 psi/in [135 kPa/mm] would be an
appropriate "frozen" k.
The seasonal variation in degree of saturation is difficult to predict, but in locations where a water
table is constantly present at a depth of less than about 10 ft [3 m], it is reasonable to expect that
fine-grained subgrades will remain at least 70 to 90 percent saturated, and may be completely
saturated for substantial periods in the spring. County soil reports can provide data on the
position of the high-water table (i.e., the typical depth to the water table at the time of the year that
it is at its highest). Unfortunately, county soil reports do not provide data on the variation in depth
to the water table throughout the year.
Figure 41. Approximate relationship of k-value range to CBR.
Figure 42. Approximate relationship of k-value range to DCP penetration rate.
Method B — Deflection Testing and Backcalculation Methods. These methods are suitable
for determining k-value for design of overlays of existing pavements, for design of a reconstructed
pavement on existing alignments, or for design of similar pavements in the same general location
on the same type of subgrade. An agency may also use backcalculation methods to develop
correlations between nondestructive deflection testing results and subgrade types and properties.
Cut and fill sections are likely to yield different k-values. No embankment or rigid layer adjustment
is required for backcalculated k-values if these characteristics are similar for the pavement being
tested and the pavement being designed, but backcalculated dynamic k-values do need to be
reduced by a factor of two to estimate a static elastic k-value for use in design which is required in
this catalog.
An appropriate design subgrade elastic k-value for use as an input to this design method is
determined by the following steps:
1. Measure deflections on an in-service concrete or composite (AC-overlaid PCC) pavement

with the same or similar subgrade as the pavement being designed.
2. Compute the appropriate AREA of each deflection basin.
3. Compute an initial estimate (assuming an infinite slab size) of the radius of relative stiffness, l.
4. Compute an initial estimate (assuming an infinite slab size) of the subgrade k-value.
5. Compute adjustment factors for the maximum deflection d0 and the initially estimated l to
account for the finite slab size.
6. Adjust the initially estimated k-value to account for the finite slab size.
7. Compute the mean backcalculated subgrade k-value for all of the deflection basins
considered.
8. Compute the estimated mean static k-value for use in design for the specific season during
the testing.
9. Determine the effective seasonally adjusted elastic k-value considering the factors discussed
above.
These steps are described below, with the relevant equations for bare concrete and composite
(asphalt concrete over concrete slab) pavements given for each step.
Measure deflections. Measure slab deflection basins along the project at an interval sufficient to
adequately assess conditions. Intervals of 100 to 1000 ft [30 to 300 m] are typical. Measure
deflections with sensors located at 0, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 60 in [0, 203, 305, 457, 610, 915, and
1524 mm] from the center of the load. Measure deflections in the outer wheel path. A heavy-load
deflection device (e.g., Falling Weight Deflectometer) and a load magnitude of 9,000 lbf [40 kN]
are recommended. ASTM D4694 and D4695 provide additional guidance on deflection testing.
Compute AREA. For a bare concrete pavement, compute the AREA7 of each deflection basin
 d8   d   d   d   d   d 
AREA7 = 4 + 6   + 5  12  + 6  18  + 9  24  + 18  36  + 12  60 
deflections with sensors located at 0, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 60 in [0, 203, 305, 457, 610, 915, and
1524 mm] from the center of the load. Measure deflections in the outer wheel path. A heavy-load
deflection device (e.g., Falling Weight Deflectometer) and a load magnitude of 9,000 lbf [40 kN]
are recommended. ASTM D4694 and D4695 provide additional guidance on deflection testing.
Compute AREA. For a bare concrete pavement, compute the AREA7 of each deflection basin
 d8   d   d   d   d   d 
AREA7 = 4 + 6   + 5  12  + 6  18  + 9  24  + 18  36  + 12  60  [26]
 d0   d0   d0   d0   d0   d0 
using the following equation:

where d0 = deflection in center of loading plate, inches
di = deflections at 0, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 60 in [0, 203, 305, 457, 610, 915, and 1524
mm] from plate center, inches
For a composite pavement, compute the AREA5 of each deflection basin using the following
 d 18   d   d   d 
AREA5 = 3 + 6   + 9  24  + 18  36  + 12  60  [27]
 d 12   d 12   d 12   d 12 
equation:
Estimate l assuming an infinite slab size. The radius of relative stiffness for a bare
concrete pavement (assuming an infinite slab) may be estimated using the following equation:
2.566
  60 AREA7  
 ln  289.708  
est =    [28]
 - 0.698 
 
The radius of relative stiffness for a composite pavement (assuming an infinite slab) may be
2.220
  48 AREA5  
 ln  158.40  
est =    [29]
 - 0.476 
 
estimated using the following equation:

Estimate k assuming an infinite slab size. For a bare concrete pavement, compute an
P d *0
k est = [30]
d 0  est 
2
initial estimate of the k-value using the following equation:

where k = backcalculated dynamic k-value, psi/in
P = load, lb
d0 = deflection measured at center of load plate, inch
lest = estimated radius of relative stiffness, inches, from previous step
P d *0
k est =
d 0  est 
2
initial estimate of the k-value using the following equation:

where k = backcalculated dynamic k-value, psi/in
P = load, lb
d0 = deflection measured at center of load plate, inch
lest = estimated radius of relative stiffness, inches, from previous step
*
d 0
= nondimensional coefficient of deflection at center of load plate:
*  -0.14707 e  -0.0 756 5est  

d 0 = 0.1245 e [31]
P d *12
k est = [32]
d 12  est 
2
For a composite pavement, compute an initial estimate of the k-value using the following equation:
d12 = deflection measured 12 in [305 mm] from center of load plate, inch
lest = estimated radius of relative stiffness, in, from previous step
d12* = nondimensional coefficient of deflection 12 in [305 mm] from center of load plate:
*  -0.79432e  -0 .0 70 7 4est  
d 12 = 0.12188 e [33]
Compute adjustment factors for d0 and l for finite slab size. For both bare concrete and
composite pavements, the initial estimate of l is used to compute the following adjustment factors
0.8 01 51
 L 
-0.71878   [34]
AF d 0 = 1 - 1.15085 e  est 
1.048 31
 L 
-0.61662  
AF  = 1 - 0.89434 e  est 
[35]
to d0 and l to account for the finite size of the slabs tested:
where, if the slab length is less than or equal to twice the slab width, L is the square root of the
product of the slab length and width, both in inches, or if the slab length is greater than twice the
if Ll  2 * L w , L = Ll L w
[36]
if Ll > 2 * L w , L = 2 * Ll
width, L is the product of the square root of two and the slab length in inches:
Adjust k for finite slab size. For both bare concrete and composite pavements, adjust the
if Ll  2 * L w , L = Ll L w
if Ll > 2 * L w , L = 2 * Ll
width, L is the product of the square root of two and the slab length in inches:
Adjust k for finite slab size. For both bare concrete and composite pavements, adjust the
k est
k= 2 [37]
AF AF d 0

initially estimated k-value using the following equation:
Compute mean dynamic k-value. Exclude from the calculation of the mean k-value any
unrealistic values (i.e., less than 50 psi/in [14 kPa/mm] or greater than 1500 psi/in [407 kPa/mm]),
as well as any individual values that appear to be significantly out of line with the rest of the
values.
Compute the estimated mean static k-value for design. Divide the mean dynamic k-value by
two to estimate the mean static k-value for design.
A blank worksheet for computation of k from deflection data and example computations of k from
deflection basins measured on two pavements, one bare concrete and the other composite, are
given in Table 12.
Seasonal variation in backcalculated k-values. The design k-value determined from

backcalculation as described above represents the k-value for the season in which the deflection
testing was conducted. An agency may wish to conduct deflection testing on selected projects in
different seasons of the year to assess the seasonal variation in backcalculated k-values for
different types of subgrades.
Table 12.
Table12.
Table A2. Determination of design subgrade k-value from deflection measurements.
BARE CONCRETE PAVEMENT
Step Equation Calculated Value Example
d0 ______________ 0.00418
d8 ______________ 0.00398
d12 ______________ 0.00384
d18 ______________ 0.00361
d24 ______________ 0.00336
d36 ______________ 0.00288
d60 ______________ 0.00205
AREA7 [26] 45.0
Initial estimate of l [28] 40.79
Nondimensional d0* [31] 0.1237

and initial estimate of k [30] 160
Afd 0
[34] 0.867
AFl [35] 0.934
Adjusted k [37] 212
Mean dynamic k 212
Mean static k for design 106

COMPOSITE PAVEMENT
Step Equation Calculated Value Example
d12 ______________ 0.00349

d18 ______________ 0.00332
d24 ______________ 0.00313
d36 ______________ 0.00273
d60 ______________ 0.00202
AREA5 [27] 37.8
Initial estimate of l [29] 48.83
Nondimensional d12* [33] 0.1189

and initial estimate of k [32] 128
Afd 0
[34] 0.823
AFl [35] 0.896
Adjusted k [37] 195
Mean dynamic k 195
Mean static k for design 97

Method C -- Plate Bearing Test Methods. The subgrade or embankment elastic k-value may
be determined from either of two types of plate bearing tests: repetitive static plate loading
(AASHTO T221, ASTM D1195) or nonrepetitive static plate loading (AASHTO T222, ASTM
D1196). These test methods were developed for a variety of purposes, and do not provide explicit
guidance on the determination of the required k-value input to the design procedure described
here.
For the purpose of concrete pavement design, the recommended subgrade input parameter is
the static elastic k-value. This may be determined from either a repetitive or nonrepetitive test on
the prepared subgrade or on a prepared test embankment, provided that the embankment is at
least 10 ft [3 m] thick. Otherwise, the tests should be conducted on the subgrade, and the k-value
obtained should be adjusted to account for the thickness and density of the embankment, using
the nomograph provided in Step 3.
In a repetitive test, the elastic k-value is determined from the ratio of load to elastic
deformation (the recoverable portion of the total deformation measured). In a nonrepetitive test,
the load-deformation ratio at a deformation of 0.05 in [1.25 mm] is considered to represent the
elastic k-value, according to extensive research by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Note also that a 30-in-diameter [762-mm-diameter] plate should be used to determine the
elastic static k-value for use in design. Smaller diameter plates will yield substantially higher k-
values, which are not appropriate for use in this design procedure. An adequate number of tests
should be run to ensure coverage over the project length. The mean of the tests becomes the
static elastic k-value for the season of testing. This value is then used to determine the effective
seasonally adjusted elastic k-value considering the factors discussed above.
Season Number of Months Subgrade k-Value, W18, Relative Damage
psi/in millions in the Season
21.72 0.0000
19.19 0.0000
23.12 0.0000
22.31 0.0000
Total: 0 Mean Damage:
W18:
Seasonally Adjusted Subgrade k-Value (psi/in): 165
0 0
Adjustment for the Effects of Embankment and/or Shallow Rigid Layer:
The seasonally adjusted subgrade k-value is to be adjusted using the following nomograph if:
(a) fill material will be placed above the natural subgrade, and/or
(b) a rigid layer (e.g., bedrock or hardpan clay) is present at a depth of 10 ft or less beneath
the existing subgrade surface.
Note: The rigid layer adjustment should only be applied if the subgrade k was determined
on the basis of soil type or similar correlations. If the k-value was determined from
nondestructive deflection testing or from plate bearing tests, the effect of a rigid laye
if present at a depth of less than 10 ft, is already represented in the k-value obtained.
easonally Adjusted Subgrade k-Value: psi/in
If required, use the nomograph below to adjust the above subgrade k-value for fill and/or
rigid layer and enter the adjusted value here:
psi/in
Size image for better resolution.
Traffic Worksheet
Performance Period: years

Two-Way Daily Traffic (ADT):
Number of Lanes in Design Direction: ###
Percent of All Trucks in Design Lane: ###
Percent Trucks in Design Direction: ###
Average Initial Annual % Accumulated

Vehicle Percent of ADT Annual %
Truck Factor Growth in ESALs
Class (Total = 100%) Growth (ESALs/truck) Truck Factor (millions)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Sum of % ADT: 0.0 Calculated ESALs: million

###
(Should be 100) ###
Saved Data
Select row to be exported and click the "Export" button.
ID Agency: Street Address: City: State: Project Number: Description:

Clear
Example ERES 505 W. University Ave. Champaign IL 1-20-98LCB Lean Concrete Base, 5-in
Page 44
Saved Data
Location: 28-day Mean Modulus of Rupture, (S'c)'

Initial Serviceability, P1:Terminal Serviceability, P2:
Champaign, IL 4.5 2.5 700
Page 45
Saved Data
Elastic Modulus of Slab, EcPoisson's

: Ratio for Concrete, m:Elastic Modulus of Base, EbD
: esign Thickness of Base, Hb:
0.15
4500000 0.15 25000 6
Page 46
Saved Data
Slab-Base Friction Factor, f:Reliability Level (R):Overall Standard Deviation, S0Mean

: Annual Wind Speed, WIND:
1.4 90 0.34 10.2
Page 47
Saved Data
Mean Annual Air Temperature, TEMP:

Mean Annual Precipitation, PRECIP:Subgrade k-Value ESALs
49.2 33.3 165 21.88065817
Page 48
Saved Data
Faulting Check Sheet (doweled)

Edge Support Factor:Pavement TypeJoint Spacing: Dowel Base/Slab Friction Restriant TRANGE Slab Thickness
1 JPCP
1 JPCP 15 1.5 0.8 65 11.2398181822
Page 49
Saved Data
k Sheet (doweled) Faulting Check Sheet (non doweled) Corner Break Check Shee
Base Type FI CESAL AGE Cd Days90 Slab Thickness Base Type FI CESAL AGE Cd Gradient
0 500 21.88065817 20 1 20 11.2398181822 0 500 21.88065817 20 1.1 1
Page 50
Saved Data
Corner Break Check Sheet Fill/Rigid Adjustment k-Value Sheet

Tensile Stress top Adjusted k-Value Season1 Months1 k1 Season2 Months2 k2 Season3 Months3 k3
120 175 Fall 2 150 Winter 3 300 Spring 3 80
Page 51
Saved Data
k-Value Sheet
Season4 Months4 k4 Season5 Months5 k5 Season6 Months6 Seasons6Performance Period:
Summer 4 120 20
Page 52
Saved Data
Two-Way Daily Traffic (ADT):

Number of lanes in Design Direction:
Percent of All Trucks in Design Lane:
8000 2 0.95
Page 53
Saved Data
Percent Trucks in Design Direction:ADT1 GADT1 TF1 GTF1 ADT2 GADT2 TF2 GTF2 ADT3 GADT3 TF3
0.5 0.65 0.05 0.004 0.03 0.25 0.06 0.39 0.02 0.1 0.08 1.62
Page 54
Saved Data
Traffic Sheet
GTF3 ADT4 GADT4 TF4 GTF4 ADT5 GADT5 TF5 GTF5 ADT6 GADT6 TF6 GTF6 ADT7 GADT7 TF7 GTF7
0.05
Page 55
Saved Data
ADT8 GADT8 TF8 GTF8 ADT9 GADT9 TF9 GTF9 ADT10 GADT10 TF10 GTF10 ADT11 GADT11 TF11 GTF11
Page 56
Saved Data
ADT12 GADT12 TF12 GTF12 ADT13 GADT13 TF13 GTF13
Page 57
FI&DAYS90
Average Annual Total

Freezing Index Precipitation, PRECIP
SHRP_id State_id State County (oF-days) (in)
6019 1 Alabama BALDWIN 9 65.59
5008 1 Alabama CLEBURNE 75 52.95
4129 1 Alabama COOSA 57 54.54
4126 1 Alabama CULLMAN 93 63.34
1021 1 Alabama ELMORE 22 53.53
4155 1 Alabama HOUSTON 20 53.68
4073 1 Alabama JACKSON 97 66.07
4084 1 Alabama JEFFERSON 59 57.00
1011 1 Alabama LAUDERDALE 124 54.33
1001 1 Alabama LEE 28 49.83
3998 1 Alabama SUMTER 54 56.04
6012 1 Alabama TUSCALOOSA 41 57.91
1004 2 Alaska ANCHORAGE 1888 21.65
6010 2 Alaska ANCHORAGE 2113 19.36
1008 2 Alaska FAIRBANKS 4543 12.73
9035 2 Alaska MATANUSKA-SUSITNA 2739 29.22
1007 4 Arizona MARICOPA 0 8.94
1034 4 Arizona MOHAVE 0 5.34
1018 4 Arizona PIMA 4 22.58
1017 4 Arizona PIMA 4 21.95
1016 4 Arizona SANTA CRUZ 3 18.81
6060 4 Arizona SANTA CRUZ 4 17.22
1065 4 Arizona YAVAPAI 60 14.07
1024 4 Arizona YAVAPAI 117 13.89
3048 5 Arkansas ARKANSAS 122 54.93
2042 5 Arkansas ASHLEY 79 59.82
3071 5 Arkansas BENTON 297 46.83
3058 5 Arkansas CRAIGHEAD 53 64.65
4046 5 Arkansas CRAIGHEAD 201 47.39
4019 5 Arkansas JEFFERSON 114 54.92
4021 5 Arkansas LONOKE 123 51.05
3073 5 Arkansas PULASKI 107 51.05
3059 5 Arkansas SEBASTIAN 168 43.82
3074 5 Arkansas ST FRANCIS 156 52.42
4023 5 Arkansas WHITE 146 53.41
3011 5 Arkansas WHITE 149 51.23
Page 58
FI&DAYS90
1253 6 California BUTTE 3 45.94

7454 6 California CALAVERAS 1 16.22
2038 6 California DEL NORTE 1 71.33
2040 6 California HUMBOLDT 1 48.40
2041 6 California HUMBOLDT 1 48.01
8534 6 California IMPERIAL 0 2.97
8535 6 California IMPERIAL 0 3.04
8201 6 California KERN 0 8.80
8202 6 California KINGS 1 7.36
7452 6 California LAKE 4 33.03
3017 6 California LOS ANGELES 0 19.95
2051 6 California NAPA 1 26.51
6044 6 California NEVADA 13 52.62
9107 6 California PLACER 145 68.72
2004 6 California RIVERSIDE 0 12.48
8150 6 California SAN BERNARDINO 0 9.39
3010 6 California SAN DIEGO 0 13.56
3042 6 California SAN JOAQUIN 1 18.08
8153 6 California SAN LUIS OBISPO 0 18.76
2053 6 California SAN MATEO 0 24.56
8156 6 California SANTA BARBARA 0 15.83
3030 6 California SHASTA 3 25.44
3005 6 California SISKIYOU 70 49.60
2002 6 California SISKIYOU 143 20.45
2647 6 California TUOLUMNE 2 27.05
9049 6 California YOLO 0 18.29
7035 8 Colorado ADAMS 548 16.61
7776 8 Colorado ADAMS 612 15.74
7036 8 Colorado ARAPAHOE 660 15.54
7781 8 Colorado BENT 471 12.04
2008 8 Colorado BENT 471 12.04
1053 8 Colorado DELTA 464 10.00
7780 8 Colorado EL PASO 1453 22.54
3032 8 Colorado GARFIELD 655 14.14
7783 8 Colorado GARFIELD 672 15.49
9020 8 Colorado LARIMER 617 14.83
6013 8 Colorado LOGAN 850 16.34
1057 8 Colorado MESA 459 8.31
1029 8 Colorado MOFFAT 1395 14.72
Page 59
FI&DAYS90
6002 8 Colorado PUEBLO 477 11.38

1047 8 Colorado RIO BLANCO 1218 11.47
9019 8 Colorado WELD 686 14.08
4008 9 Connecticut HARTFORD 552 46.01
4020 9 Connecticut HARTFORD 620 44.75
1803 9 Connecticut NEW LONDON 399 49.55
5001 9 Connecticut TOLLAND 715 48.92
5005 10 Delaware KENT 225 45.67
4002 10 Delaware KENT 231 44.98
1450 10 Delaware KENT 241 44.23
5004 10 Delaware NEW CASTLE 354 43.07
1201 10 Delaware SUSSEX 205 44.90
4096 12 Florida BAY 8 65.83
3997 12 Florida CLAY 2 48.71
1060 12 Florida DADE 0 56.52
4103 12 Florida DADE 0 57.32
4105 12 Florida DUVAL 4 46.18
3811 12 Florida GADSDEN 9 56.84
3996 12 Florida HERNANDO 2 54.87
4057 12 Florida HILLSBOROUGH 0 49.52
3804 12 Florida HILLSBOROUGH 0 49.21
4097 12 Florida JACKSON 14 57.94
4099 12 Florida LEE 0 54.09
1030 12 Florida MARTIN 0 55.55
9054 12 Florida NASSAU 3 48.63
4108 12 Florida OKALOOSA 8 69.59
4100 12 Florida OKALOOSA 12 70.45
4101 12 Florida ORANGE 1 47.43
3995 12 Florida PALM BEACH 0 58.55
4106 12 Florida PALM BEACH 0 53.88
4135 12 Florida POLK 0 48.95
4136 12 Florida POLK 0 48.94
4137 12 Florida POLK 0 48.74
4153 12 Florida ST LUCIE 0 45.67
4107 12 Florida ST LUCIE 0 47.71
4154 12 Florida VOLUSIA 0 51.03
4119 13 Georgia BARTOW 105 49.44
4420 13 Georgia BRYAN 7 46.85
5023 13 Georgia CAMDEN 3 49.85
3015 13 Georgia CANDLER 11 45.76
3020 13 Georgia CRISP 7 41.24
1031 13 Georgia DAWSON 91 59.82
4096 13 Georgia EARLY 12 49.06
7028 13 Georgia FRANKLIN 51 55.26
Page 60
FI&DAYS90
3019 13 Georgia HALL 60 53.77

3016 13 Georgia HARALSON 67 51.94
1005 13 Georgia HOUSTON 11 41.34
4111 13 Georgia OCONEE 39 46.26
3007 13 Georgia PICKENS 103 57.56
1004 13 Georgia SPALDING 47 44.64
3017 13 Georgia TALIAFERRO 32 47.51
4093 13 Georgia THOMAS 4 45.32
4092 13 Georgia THOMAS 5 49.91
3011 13 Georgia TREUTLEN 12 44.89
1001 13 Georgia WALTON 26 44.44
3018 13 Georgia WARREN 37 48.95
1008 15 Hawaii HAWAII 0 44.23
7080 15 Hawaii HAWAII 0 28.40
1003 15 Hawaii MAUI 0 28.09
1006 15 Hawaii MAUI 0 21.92
1005 16 Idaho ADAMS 923 19.42
5025 16 Idaho BANNOCK 977 14.57
6027 16 Idaho BEAR LAKE 1604 15.50
9034 16 Idaho BONNER 548 31.67
1009 16 Idaho CASSIA 701 10.19
1010 16 Idaho JEFFERSON 1278 11.92
1021 16 Idaho JEFFERSON 1347 10.91
1020 16 Idaho JEROME 568 9.42
1001 16 Idaho KOOTENAI 399 26.41
9032 16 Idaho KOOTENAI 461 27.94
3023 16 Idaho PAYETTE 706 9.48
3017 16 Idaho POWER 629 10.29
5849 17 Illinois CHAMPAIGN 843 39.39
1003 17 Illinois CLINTON 336 40.30
7937 17 Illinois HENRY 1041 36.58
5453 17 Illinois JEFFERSON 486 42.42
5217 17 Illinois MC LEAN 792 37.46
9327 17 Illinois MC LEAN 792 37.46
5843 17 Illinois OGLE 1095 35.85
5854 17 Illinois PEORIA 856 38.11
5869 17 Illinois PEORIA 878 37.19
9267 17 Illinois ROCK ISLAND 1000 35.93
6050 17 Illinois ST CLAIR 461 38.36
1002 17 Illinois STEPHENSON 1065 30.19
4074 17 Illinois STEPHENSON 1065 30.18
5908 17 Illinois WILLIAMSON 459 45.72
2008 18 Indiana ALLEN 773 37.51
3002 18 Indiana BENTON 892 37.01
3030 18 Indiana DELAWARE 742 39.68
9020 18 Indiana GRANT 842 37.87
4021 18 Indiana HAMILTON 788 41.43
5538 18 Indiana LA PORTE 847 39.50
Page 61
FI&DAYS90
5528 18 Indiana LA PORTE 847 39.60

5022 18 Indiana MARION 708 41.42
3003 18 Indiana MARSHALL 867 39.73
4042 18 Indiana POSEY 375 45.96
3031 18 Indiana POSEY 404 45.43
1037 18 Indiana SPENCER 300 47.60
1028 18 Indiana SPENCER 442 48.69
5518 18 Indiana TIPPECANOE 796 36.82
5043 18 Indiana VANDERBURGH 358 45.82
6049 19 Iowa CEDAR 1101 37.08
3006 19 Iowa CLINTON 1037 33.41
5046 19 Iowa FRANKLIN 1466 32.30
3055 19 Iowa HAMILTON 1400 32.62
3033 19 Iowa JOHNSON 845 35.53
3028 19 Iowa JOHNSON 849 35.88
3009 19 Iowa LINN 1198 32.46
9126 19 Iowa SCOTT 973 34.34
9116 19 Iowa WORTH 1680 32.32
5042 19 Iowa WRIGHT 1458 32.10
4054 20 Kansas DICKINSON 495 29.44
7073 20 Kansas DICKINSON 577 30.22
3015 20 Kansas FINNEY 554 17.73
1010 20 Kansas FORD 436 22.70
1005 20 Kansas FRANKLIN 530 39.33
3013 20 Kansas JOHNSON 469 41.07
4053 20 Kansas LINCOLN 448 35.41
7085 20 Kansas MARSHALL 787 31.04
6026 20 Kansas RENO 439 29.19
9037 20 Kansas SHAWNEE 598 35.22
1009 20 Kansas STAFFORD 378 26.06
4063 20 Kansas WYANDOTTE 507 39.92
1034 21 Kentucky BARREN 287 54.67
3016 21 Kentucky BULLITT 254 48.10
6043 21 Kentucky CLAY 279 50.27
4025 21 Kentucky FAYETTE 384 44.70
6040 21 Kentucky FAYETTE 394 45.18
1010 21 Kentucky OWSLEY 307 48.90
1014 21 Kentucky PIKE 225 45.49
4001 22 Louisiana LIVINGSTON 13 67.93
3056 22 Louisiana RAPIDES 31 56.16
1012 23 Maine CUMBERLAND 981 44.37
1026 23 Maine FRANKLIN 1522 45.48
1009 23 Maine LINCOLN 1023 47.09
1028 23 Maine OXFORD 1585 44.77
1001 23 Maine PENOBSCOT 1534 44.19
3014 23 Maine SAGADAHOC 1028 47.67
5807 24 Maryland ANNE ARUNDEL 236 42.32
1632 24 Maryland CALVERT 152 42.51
Page 62
FI&DAYS90
2805 24 Maryland FREDERICK 217 38.04

2401 24 Maryland HARFORD 229 52.77
1004 25 Massachusetts BRISTOL 395 49.99
1002 25 Massachusetts HAMPDEN 633 46.31
1003 25 Massachusetts NORFOLK 625 47.42
3069 26 Michigan CLARE 1211 32.54
3068 26 Michigan CLARE 1215 32.38
1001 26 Michigan CLARE 1392 30.97
1010 26 Michigan GENESEE 978 32.37
1004 26 Michigan HOUGHTON 1709 36.22
9029 26 Michigan IONIA 1009 33.62
9030 26 Michigan MONROE 831 33.14
5363 26 Michigan WAYNE 870 33.89
1023 27 Minnesota BELTRAMI 2624 25.90
4082 27 Minnesota BLUE EARTH 1681 27.52
4033 27 Minnesota DAKOTA 1593 31.92
3013 27 Minnesota HENNEPIN 1602 29.75
4034 27 Minnesota HENNEPIN 1657 30.18
1029 27 Minnesota ISANTI 2108 28.73
4040 27 Minnesota ITASCA 2361 27.75
1019 27 Minnesota MILLE LACS 1919 30.33
1018 27 Minnesota MORRISON 2000 26.76
1085 27 Minnesota MOWER 1727 31.06
3003 27 Minnesota NICOLLET 1388 27.23
6300 27 Minnesota NOBLES 1810 27.18
1028 27 Minnesota OTTER TAIL 2517 25.36
4050 27 Minnesota POLK 2710 22.01
9075 27 Minnesota RENVILLE 1918 27.45
7090 27 Minnesota SCOTT 1806 30.71
6064 27 Minnesota STEARNS 2114 27.74
5076 27 Minnesota WASHINGTON 1698 31.42
4054 27 Minnesota WINONA 1546 33.33
4055 27 Minnesota WRIGHT 2071 28.70
3097 28 Mississippi DE SOTO 114 52.55
5805 28 Mississippi HARRISON 7 65.16
3081 28 Mississippi ITAWAMBA 79 55.35
3093 28 Mississippi JACKSON 11 63.55
3094 28 Mississippi JACKSON 13 63.29
3089 28 Mississippi LAFAYETTE 129 58.88
3091 28 Mississippi LAUDERDALE 35 57.71
5006 28 Mississippi LEE 102 54.62
5025 28 Mississippi LINCOLN 43 61.47
3085 28 Mississippi MARSHALL 148 56.64
Page 63
FI&DAYS90

3082 28 Mississippi MONTGOMERY 94 67.88
3090 28 Mississippi PANOLA 126 56.09
3099 28 Mississippi SCOTT 32 61.81
3019 28 Mississippi TISHOMINGO 148 54.74
3018 28 Mississippi TISHOMINGO 150 54.84
9030 28 Mississippi WARREN 28 56.69
7012 28 Mississippi WARREN 37 55.33
4024 28 Mississippi WASHINGTON 62 55.63
6067 29 Missouri CARTER 342 47.17
4036 29 Missouri CLAY 568 37.19
5483 29 Missouri CLAY 569 37.59
1002 29 Missouri COLE 382 39.56
5473 29 Missouri COOPER 543 39.54
5091 29 Missouri DAVIESS 874 36.24
5413 29 Missouri DUNKLIN 188 50.00
5403 29 Missouri DUNKLIN 207 50.97
1008 29 Missouri JASPER 66 55.07
7073 29 Missouri LIVINGSTON 640 38.22
7054 29 Missouri NEWTON 309 43.23
1010 29 Missouri PULASKI 396 45.69
5393 29 Missouri ST CHARLES 542 37.98
5047 29 Missouri ST LOUIS 549 37.72
7076 30 Montana BIG HORN 1160 16.07
8129 30 Montana GOLDEN VALLEY 1121 11.84
1001 30 Montana JUDITH BASIN 1094 17.28
7088 30 Montana SWEET GRASS 840 15.35
7066 30 Montana SWEET GRASS 841 15.35
7075 30 Montana YELLOWSTONE 1092 15.09
3018 31 Nebraska BUFFALO 844 24.40
7017 31 Nebraska CEDAR 1253 25.01
6702 31 Nebraska CHEYENNE 853 17.06
4019 31 Nebraska DAKOTA 1256 25.59
5052 31 Nebraska DOUGLAS 1040 28.90
1030 31 Nebraska FURNAS 716 22.24
3023 31 Nebraska HALL 779 26.70
6701 31 Nebraska HALL 965 25.28
3028 31 Nebraska LANCASTER 788 31.46
6700 31 Nebraska PHELPS 741 22.95
3033 31 Nebraska PIERCE 885 24.74
1030 32 Nevada CLARK 5 5.18
3013 32 Nevada ELKO 626 5.95
7000 32 Nevada ELKO 655 6.48
2027 32 Nevada ELKO 860 8.56
3010 32 Nevada ELKO 1070 11.27
1020 32 Nevada MINERAL 200 3.84
1021 32 Nevada WASHOE 230 8.31
Page 64
FI&DAYS90
1001 33 New Hampshire MERRIMACK 1027 39.74

4042 34 New Jersey BURLINGTON 310 47.89
1034 34 New Jersey GLOUCESTER 231 44.23
1638 34 New Jersey GLOUCESTER 235 44.33
1033 34 New Jersey HUNTERDON 395 48.37
6057 34 New Jersey MERCER 348 44.87
1030 34 New Jersey PASSAIC 698 54.19
1003 35 New Mexico CHAVES 107 14.58
6401 35 New Mexico CIBOLA 215 12.55
6035 35 New Mexico CIBOLA 277 10.51
1112 35 New Mexico LEA 93 16.79
3010 35 New Mexico LEA 93 16.79
1002 35 New Mexico LINCOLN 108 16.38
2118 35 New Mexico QUAY 195 18.27
1022 35 New Mexico SAN JUAN 465 11.07
1005 35 New Mexico SANTA FE 245 15.83
6033 35 New Mexico SOCORRO 113 9.46
4017 36 New York ALLEGANY 1028 36.99
1008 36 New York ONEIDA 1051 43.62
1011 36 New York ONONDAGA 830 38.69
4018 36 New York OTSEGO 1065 42.57
1644 36 New York ST LAWRENCE 1757 43.87
5037 37 North Carolina BUNCOMBE 150 46.25
1801 37 North Carolina BUNCOMBE 164 41.27
1992 37 North Carolina CHATHAM 9 48.57
2824 37 North Carolina CHATHAM 103 48.92
3008 37 North Carolina CLEVELAND 52 45.18
1645 37 North Carolina COLUMBUS 39 43.58
3807 37 North Carolina DAVIDSON 95 44.42
3816 37 North Carolina DURHAM 82 44.30
3044 37 North Carolina DURHAM 97 45.88
1817 37 North Carolina FORSYTH 86 44.53
1802 37 North Carolina GRANVILLE 85 43.96
2819 37 North Carolina GUILFORD 86 44.91
1024 37 North Carolina JACKSON 120 49.46
1803 37 North Carolina JACKSON 171 51.58
1814 37 North Carolina MACON 127 53.88
2825 37 North Carolina MECKLENBURG 42 44.77
1040 37 North Carolina MITCHELL 289 56.06
3011 37 North Carolina NASH 101 44.43
5827 37 North Carolina ROCKINGHAM 160 45.78
1352 37 North Carolina STANLY 68 48.56
5826 37 North Carolina SURRY 171 45.28
1006 37 North Carolina WAKE 76 45.11
5002 38 North Dakota CASS 2339 20.09
2001 38 North Dakota GRAND FORKS 2623 19.35
3005 38 North Dakota NELSON 2481 19.05
3006 38 North Dakota PIERCE 2675 15.71
3801 39 Ohio BELMONT 458 40.09
3013 39 Ohio BROWN 478 44.62
Page 65
FI&DAYS90
9006 39 Ohio CLINTON 621 41.46

4031 39 Ohio FRANKLIN 562 38.21
4018 39 Ohio GREENE 650 39.36
5003 39 Ohio LORAIN 656 37.47
5010 39 Ohio MAHONING 772 38.57
7021 39 Ohio WOOD 735 34.65
4163 40 Oklahoma BLAINE 212 33.13
4162 40 Oklahoma COMANCHE 163 42.92
4086 40 Oklahoma GRADY 168 33.60
4154 40 Oklahoma GRADY 212 40.40
4087 40 Oklahoma JACKSON 150 31.72
4088 40 Oklahoma KAY 321 33.13
6010 40 Oklahoma LE FLORE 124 46.67
4164 40 Oklahoma MAJOR 291 28.79
4165 40 Oklahoma MAJOR 311 31.62
4157 40 Oklahoma MAYES 65 47.72
5021 40 Oklahoma MAYES 253 41.93
3018 40 Oklahoma OKLAHOMA 198 37.42
4166 40 Oklahoma PITTSBURG 99 66.36
4160 40 Oklahoma PONTOTOC 157 40.62
4158 40 Oklahoma WASHINGTON 144 42.20
4155 40 Oklahoma WASHINGTON 252 39.15
7025 41 Oregon DOUGLAS 27 48.38
7019 41 Oregon JACKSON 45 20.46
5022 41 Oregon LANE 47 44.40
5021 41 Oregon LANE 49 43.98
6011 41 Oregon LINN 39 49.21
7018 41 Oregon LINN 49 45.25
5005 41 Oregon LINN 60 39.61
7081 41 Oregon UMATILLA 223 6.96
5006 41 Oregon UNION 379 16.76
5008 41 Oregon UNION 382 16.86
6012 41 Oregon WASCO 155 25.05
2002 41 Oregon WASHINGTON 58 40.28
1691 42 Pennsylvania BEAVER 547 37.48
1608 42 Pennsylvania BEDFORD 592 36.45
1606 42 Pennsylvania BEDFORD 703 37.24
3044 42 Pennsylvania BERKS 428 45.54
9027 42 Pennsylvania BERKS 587 47.32
7025 42 Pennsylvania CAMBRIA 594 47.84
1614 42 Pennsylvania CENTRE 898 38.91
1627 42 Pennsylvania CLEARFIELD 930 41.79
1598 42 Pennsylvania CUMBERLAND 432 40.66
1613 42 Pennsylvania DELAWARE 327 44.26
1599 42 Pennsylvania ELK 903 43.41
7037 42 Pennsylvania JEFFERSON 776 44.87
1623 42 Pennsylvania LYCOMING 541 40.14
1690 42 Pennsylvania LYCOMING 633 41.38
1617 42 Pennsylvania MONTGOMERY 364 44.56
5020 42 Pennsylvania MONTGOMERY 389 43.95
Page 66
FI&DAYS90
1605 42 Pennsylvania NORTHUMBERLAND 609 43.10

1618 42 Pennsylvania SOMERSET 492 38.99
1597 42 Pennsylvania TIOGA 1015 31.55
1610 42 Pennsylvania YORK 407 40.68
7401 44 Rhode Island PROVIDENCE 681 45.33
1011 45 South Carolina CHARLESTON 9 49.35
5034 45 South Carolina DARLINGTON 29 45.15
3012 45 South Carolina FAIRFIELD 48 43.45
5035 45 South Carolina FLORENCE 26 44.80
1025 45 South Carolina GREENWOOD 59 44.71
1024 45 South Carolina LEXINGTON 15 45.72
1008 45 South Carolina OCONEE 61 59.91
5017 45 South Carolina RICHLAND 36 46.26
7019 45 South Carolina SPARTANBURG 49 52.84
3009 46 South Dakota CODINGTON 1953 23.26
5025 46 South Dakota JACKSON 1036 15.75
9197 46 South Dakota JERAULD 1527 21.22
3052 46 South Dakota KINGSBURY 1720 21.09
3013 46 South Dakota LAWRENCE 1089 21.69
5020 46 South Dakota LAWRENCE 1115 17.74
3012 46 South Dakota MEADE 1061 25.99
9187 46 South Dakota MEADE 1605 14.25
5040 46 South Dakota MINNEHAHA 1651 23.74
3053 46 South Dakota PENNINGTON 1135 17.29
9106 46 South Dakota PERKINS 1750 16.26
3010 46 South Dakota ROBERTS 1736 21.58
7049 46 South Dakota YANKTON 1400 23.44
3108 47 Tennessee ANDERSON 187 54.06
3101 47 Tennessee CANNON 174 52.52
9025 47 Tennessee CANNON 174 52.50
3075 47 Tennessee DE KALB 236 56.82
2001 47 Tennessee DYER 256 53.50
2008 47 Tennessee GIBSON 226 55.71
1028 47 Tennessee HAWKINS 194 42.53
3109 47 Tennessee MAURY 241 53.89
6015 47 Tennessee MC MINN 176 55.73
3110 47 Tennessee MC MINN 178 54.33
6022 47 Tennessee PUTNAM 277 57.53
9024 47 Tennessee RUTHERFORD 233 53.36
3104 47 Tennessee UNION 161 47.96
3669 48 Texas ANGELINA 29 44.07
3679 48 Texas ANGELINA 41 45.35
1093 48 Texas ATASCOSA 11 25.49
2133 48 Texas BELL 44 33.67
9005 48 Texas BEXAR 13 29.58
1094 48 Texas BEXAR 16 31.99
5026 48 Texas BRAZORIA 16 44.20
1178 48 Texas BURLESON 54 33.41
3729 48 Texas CAMERON 4 26.49
5323 48 Texas CARSON 250 22.27
Page 67
FI&DAYS90
1047 48 Texas CARSON 253 22.25

1046 48 Texas CARSON 258 22.18
4146 48 Texas CHAMBERS 12 54.22
3010 48 Texas CHAMBERS 12 51.99
1119 48 Texas CHEROKEE 47 45.74
3629 48 Texas COLORADO 14 41.84
5024 48 Texas COLORADO 27 39.33
3845 48 Texas COOKE 110 36.04
5035 48 Texas DALLAS 62 36.77
3003 48 Texas DALLAS 63 34.00
6079 48 Texas DEAF SMITH 197 18.03
3749 48 Texas DUVAL 10 23.85
3779 48 Texas EL PASO 19 10.39
9355 48 Texas ELLIS 48 36.60
1039 48 Texas ELLIS 63 36.59
3699 48 Texas FORT BEND 14 47.35
2108 48 Texas GALVESTON 6 41.24
1183 48 Texas GARZA 140 21.16
5154 48 Texas GONZALES 15 37.52
5335 48 Texas GRAY 233 23.00
1050 48 Texas GRIMES 27 38.01
1130 48 Texas GUADALUPE 14 35.29
2176 48 Texas HALE 190 19.99
1077 48 Texas HALL 182 22.83
7165 48 Texas HARRIS 6 48.90
3569 48 Texas HOPKINS 79 45.26
4142 48 Texas JASPER 22 60.47
3719 48 Texas JEFFERSON 4 58.07
4143 48 Texas JEFFERSON 8 57.72
3739 48 Texas KENEDY 6 23.89
1068 48 Texas LAMAR 97 50.23
4152 48 Texas LIBERTY 13 59.15
6086 48 Texas LIVE OAK 6 33.67
1096 48 Texas MEDINA 12 25.80
1092 48 Texas MEDINA 17 26.58
5278 48 Texas MIDLAND 60 15.90
3865 48 Texas MILLS 43 27.36
5328 48 Texas MONTAGUE 98 33.83
1049 48 Texas NACOGDOCHES 37 45.85
9167 48 Texas NAVARRO 44 39.47
1174 48 Texas NUECES 3 31.09
1056 48 Texas OCHILTREE 316 19.83
1065 48 Texas OLDHAM 301 18.21
6160 48 Texas PARMER 185 17.08
6179 48 Texas PARMER 197 17.06
3689 48 Texas POLK 37 46.23
5336 48 Texas RANDALL 243 20.73
1060 48 Texas REFUGIO 6 33.14
1113 48 Texas RUSK 38 50.31
1116 48 Texas RUSK 49 48.58
Page 68
FI&DAYS90
1169 48 Texas RUSK 54 47.42

3875 48 Texas SHERMAN 368 19.22
1087 48 Texas SMITH 65 45.20
5287 48 Texas TARRANT 67 34.02
1076 48 Texas TERRY 145 18.75
1 48 Texas TRAVIS 47 27.77
3579 48 Texas VAN ZANDT 80 43.40
3559 48 Texas WALKER 27 45.84
5334 48 Texas WHEELER 240 22.63
3589 48 Texas WILBARGER 106 25.91
5310 48 Texas WISE 80 37.26
1168 48 Texas WOOD 73 47.80
7082 49 Utah BOX ELDER 759 12.47
1007 49 Utah CARBON 537 8.73
1005 49 Utah DAVIS 466 22.41
1004 49 Utah GARFIELD 655 9.26
3010 49 Utah IRON 566 13.45
3011 49 Utah JUAB 513 13.92
3015 49 Utah SALT LAKE 415 17.50
1001 49 Utah SAN JUAN 249 8.67
1006 49 Utah SANPETE 607 10.22
1017 49 Utah SEVIER 499 9.45
1008 49 Utah SEVIER 612 9.90
7083 49 Utah SEVIER 924 6.31
1002 50 Vermont ADDISON 1379 41.07
1683 50 Vermont CHITTENDEN 1567 39.54
1681 50 Vermont CHITTENDEN 1571 39.76
1004 50 Vermont GRAND ISLE 1185 30.57
2021 51 Virginia CARROLL 164 51.78
2564 51 Virginia CHESAPEAKE CITY 79 46.52
1417 51 Virginia FAUQUIER 268 44.27
1002 51 Virginia FLOYD 305 42.42
5010 51 Virginia HENRICO 128 43.00
5009 51 Virginia HENRICO 136 42.42
5008 51 Virginia NORFOLK CITY 86 45.62
2004 51 Virginia PITTSYLVANIA 121 44.70
1023 51 Virginia PRINCE GEORGE 146 46.29
1419 51 Virginia RUSSELL 274 44.49
1423 51 Virginia WISE 259 45.38
1464 51 Virginia YORK 170 43.96
1005 53 Washington ADAMS 532 11.61
3019 53 Washington BENTON 215 6.73
1007 53 Washington BENTON 307 7.26
6020 53 Washington CHELAN 404 10.18
3813 53 Washington CLARK 52 41.29
Page 69
FI&DAYS90
1801 53 Washington CLARK 76 84.16

1002 53 Washington COLUMBIA 401 17.95
3014 53 Washington FRANKLIN 325 6.61
3812 53 Washington KING 29 37.44
6049 53 Washington KING 49 39.59
1006 53 Washington OKANOGAN 617 12.07
6048 53 Washington SNOHOMISH 58 47.94
3013 53 Washington SPOKANE 624 16.59
1008 53 Washington SPOKANE 632 16.62
3011 53 Washington WHATCOM 97 35.85
6056 53 Washington WHITMAN 380 19.70
7322 53 Washington WHITMAN 483 20.87
7409 53 Washington YAKIMA 321 6.32
4003 54 West Virginia BOONE 286 46.40
4004 54 West Virginia FAYETTE 350 43.00
5007 54 West Virginia HARRISON 523 44.58
1640 54 West Virginia KANAWHA 251 43.47
7008 54 West Virginia KANAWHA 354 41.59
5037 55 Wisconsin BARRON 1954 31.94
6355 55 Wisconsin DANE 1352 28.42
6352 55 Wisconsin IOWA 1363 28.49
6354 55 Wisconsin IOWA 1411 29.09
6353 55 Wisconsin IOWA 1447 29.47
3015 55 Wisconsin MARQUETTE 1346 33.51
3012 55 Wisconsin PIERCE 1718 31.98
3019 55 Wisconsin SAWYER 2278 32.63
5040 55 Wisconsin SHEBOYGAN 941 33.27
3014 55 Wisconsin WALWORTH 1165 35.33
3016 55 Wisconsin WAUSHARA 1316 31.04
2017 56 Wyoming CAMPBELL 1167 11.93
2019 56 Wyoming CAMPBELL 1276 13.84
6031 56 Wyoming FREMONT 1625 8.35
7772 56 Wyoming HOT SPRINGS 1083 10.57
2015 56 Wyoming LARAMIE 810 16.05
6029 56 Wyoming LINCOLN 1720 18.65
2018 56 Wyoming NATRONA 1142 10.54
7773 56 Wyoming NATRONA 1163 9.44
1007 56 Wyoming PARK 1066 9.19
2020 56 Wyoming SHERIDAN 1155 14.27
3027 56 Wyoming SWEETWATER 1317 7.93
6032 56 Wyoming TETON 1885 16.44
Page 70
FI&DAYS90
DAYS90
58
39
47
41
58
66
39
51
42
50
49
60
65
56
0
0
0
0
175
173
173
170
89
79
37
90
93
111
111
61
37
63
67
40
56
56
64
55
57
57
58
62
58
71
65
Page 71
FI&DAYS90
57
73
0
1
0
167
167
113
95
69
60
22
33
2
87
105
106
101
94
159
149
58
20
7
61
70
60
70
70
3
22
11
90
32
29
74
69
25
30
29
78
78
45
0
33
33
17
41
50
9
Page 72
FI&DAYS90
56
40
27
9
8
1
4
23
26
25
16
15
71
47
41
55
53
63
82
99
105
76
97
50
50
84
72
87
62
66
114
114
114
60
65
55
52
67
71
72
34
73
52
56
54
72
96
17
94
27
Page 73
FI&DAYS90
20
38
68
48
16
34
47
99
87
79
47
51
4
5
1
1
41
29
6
6
25
15
19
45
14
17
48
46
20
32
30
30
15
32
16
16
14
19
18
15
31
17
17
28
12
15
11
9
13
9
Page 74
FI&DAYS90
10
12
14
33
34
38
23
12
34
15
14
13
12
30
26
15
11
11
13
50
55
51
61
46
28
37
41
62
34
64
33
28
40
9
14
12
28
35
71
83
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
3
24
22
Page 75
FI&DAYS90
31
35
5
10
6
5
5
5
6
2
8
9
9
4
4
4
17
12
12
12
12
11
7
4
10
10
10
16
14
6
7
13
10
8
9
9
10
49
57
57
38
36
54
58
54
59
58
57
49
49
Page 76
FI&DAYS90
42
36
53
60
55
56
67
64
77
43
37
38
38
42
25
25
25
25
52
58
68
37
40
36
30
34
23
24
7
28
28
24
35
28
36
23
24
52
31
34
37
59
29
129
46
45
45
14
64
36
Page 77
FI&DAYS90
7
19
18
18
16
15
4
72
30
17
75
75
36
65
6
21
58
1
4
5
2
0
5
6
33
30
37
47
32
30
29
30
43
29
8
6
11
41
0
38
23
44
20
27
14
8
9
14
11
12
Page 78
FI&DAYS90
8
11
11
12
5
20
59
71
81
63
92
69
69
76
73
71
52
64
66
68
69
69
14
43
9
10
10
10
13
28
22
23
17
12
8
8
4
12
10
13
1
1
12
15
3
1
11
6
14
15
Page 79
FI&DAYS90
6
9
1
16
5
44
55
49
55
49
74
23
54
31
14
53
27
21
20
31
7
36
21
8
24
19
28
19
43
42
21
42
42
14
39
27
28
21
39
17
85
85
124
91
105
92
61
99
113
59
Page 80
FI&DAYS90
56
55
75
74
76
102
111
80
92
94
62
122
98
94
95
88
15
75
100
61
90
103
58
85
76
72
77
64
71
117
78
85
110
113
103
92
85
85
79
87
116
73
50
53
56
89
52
96
72
71
Page 81
FI&DAYS90
69
51
75
89
93
87
89
90
85
78
120
72
89
74
101
81
69
51
33
40
14
16
57
44
75
43
30
43
28
1
1
1
4
21
21
20
3
35
39
28
48
53
8
6
33
25
35
34
29
8
Page 82
FI&DAYS90
10
32
36
2
4
33
2
15
14
0
20
11
31
23
3
9
20
12
6
14
14
12
12
10
8
3
7
7
8
12
13
33
22
23
34
18
4
22
10
10
25
5
7
6
3
Page 83

AASHTO - Rigid Pavement Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AASHTO - Rigid Pavement Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

AASHTO - Rigid Pavement Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Note 1: Click CTRL+j on your keyboard before using this spreadsheet in EXCEL97.

I. Input Sheet - General Information

II. Input Sheet - Design Information

l All design inputs are required except sensitivity analysis.

III. Faulting Check Sheet

Base Type or Modulus of Peak Friction Coefficient

Notes: CS = compressive strength, psi

No Wet 0.70-0.90 0.85-0.95 0.75-0.95 0.90-1.00

Notes: 1. Fine subgrade = A-1 through A-3 classes;

Mean Annual Wind Speed, mph

Mean Annual Wind Speed, mph

Mean Annual Wind Speed, mph

Mean Annual Temperature, °F

Mean Annual Temperature, °F

Mean Annual Precipitation, in

Mean Annual Precipitation, in

ALABAMA KANSAS OKLAHOMA

Project Number: ID: Clear

Base Properties Edge Support

Reliability Level (R): % Edge Support Factor: 1.00

million Reliability Standard Deviation

Calculated Slab Thickness for Above Inputs: in

Slab Thickness Design

Pavement Type JPCP

Calculated Design Thickness in

Mean Annual Wind Speed mph

Modulus of Subgrade Reaction

Period Description Subgrade k-Value, psi

Modulus of Subgrade Reaction Adjusted for Rigid Layer

Performance Period 0 years

Vehicle Class Percent of Annual Initial Annual Accumulated

Total Calculated Cumulative ESALs million

Average Fault for Design Years with Design Inputs in

Average Fault for Design Years with Design Inputs in

D Design Traffic L E l F Term1 Term2 Term3 Term4

7.0 #VALUE! 1.00 ### #VALUE! -1.94 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

#VALUE! #VALUE! 1.00 ### #VALUE! -1.94 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

Term5 Term6 Term7 log b b TD sl st ' L E l

F Term1 Term2 Term3 Term4 Term5 Term6 Term7 log b b TD

sl st L1 L2 log R G Y log W log W' W'(50%) Z

284.6 384.1 18 1 6.58 0.845 1.37 7.20 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

#VALUE! #VALUE! 18 1 #VALUE! 0.845 #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!

W 18 R log W 18 R D = A0 + A1 log W18 R

#VALUE! #VALUE! 11.239818182202

Base/Slab Frictional Restraint

● Aggregate Base or LCB w/ bond breaker

ALPHA: 6E-06 /oF ###

Base Type Base Type

Stabilized Base Stabilized Base

● Unstabilized Base Unstabilized Base

Faulting (doweled) Faulting (nondoweled) ND

Faulting Check - Faulting Check -

Joint Spacing Critical Mean Joint Faulting

Only two numbers need to be entered in this sheet:

Total Negative Temperature Differential

Construction Curling and Moisture Gradient Temperature Differential

For temperature gradient use:

Wet Climate: 0 to 2 oF/in (Annual Precipitation >= 30 in or