View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.

uk brought to you by CORE

provided by UM Digital Repository

The Malaysian Agricultural Industry in the New Millennium

– Issues and Challenges

Baki B. Bakar
University of Malaya

Abstract Malaysian agriculture is characterized by dualism, viz. smallholder’s sector

with an average farm size of 1 - 2 ha, and the plantation-based estate sector with
farm sizes in excess of 500 ha. This dichotomy in agricultural industry placed great
economic emphasis on cash crops, namely oil palm, rubber, and cocoa although
sizeable acreages of the arable lands are planted with food crops like rice, pepper,
fruit orchards, vegetables, and herbs. The industry has evolved from a stereotypic
Third World peasantry economic entity to the vibrant third engine of economic
growth contributing no less than US$5.63, 6.34, 7.75, and 8.48 billion to the national
GDP in 2003, 2005, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Agriculture remains an important
part of the national economy in the new millennium for the increasingly burgeoning
populace with the challenge to provide both food security and safety, and
sustainable development and wealth creation. The primary issues besieging
Malaysian agriculture in the new millennium include ensuring food security and food
safety for the populace with parallel and determined effort to sustain, and where
possible, increase exports of agricultural produce. Albeit the apparent decline of
agricultural sector to the Malaysian national economy, agricultural development in
Malaysia, faces three major challenges in new millennium, viz. (i) Persistence of
poverty among the rural farming community; (ii) Food insecurity for the traditional
agricultural systems; (iii) Continuing and perennial pressure on the deterioration of
the natural resource base; (iv) Labour-intensive plantation agriculture which faces
the valgary of foreign labour; (v) Low returns from agricultural investment; (vi)
Stagnating prices of commodities; (vii) High costs of land, and (viii) Often volatile
market forces. The Malaysian government re-emphasis and renewed interest in
agriculture especially for food production principally to off-set the unhealthy trend of
steady increase in food imports augurs well in promoting agricultural development in
the country. This coupled with the opening of new economic zones in Peninsular
Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak supported by the fledging government-based
administrative, research, technical and extension services, and augmented by those
in the private sector call for new strategize plans from the view point of natural
resources sustainability and environmental safety. The already-in-place New
Agricultural Policies serve as the framework for agricultural development in the
country in the new millennium. These NAPs were promulgated with the principal
thrusts areas: (a) Meeting national food requirements – through large food
production by the private sector; (b) Enhancing competitiveness and profitability in
agriculture and forestry promoting globally competitive industries in agriculture and
forestry, developing world competitive outlook and an export culture; (c) Capitalizing
on the product value-chain by reorientation from commodity-based to product-based
production and marketing, capital and technology intensive agricultural production
system and less labour intensive enterprises as well as cultivation of high-value

337
crops and forest species; (d) Enhancing the integrated development of the food and
industrial crop; (e) Strengthening requisite economic foundation, upgrading quality of
human resources, development of indigenous R&D capabilities and technology,
namely modern infrastructure, business support services, financing and incentives
and an enabling institutional framework; and (f) Adopting and emphasizing
sustainable development rules and regulations, and strengthening incentives.

Keywords: Malaysian agriculture, food security and safety, export oriented

agricultural produce.

“If there is no man,

there will be no woman,
if there is no agriculture,
there will be no mankind”
(Baki B. Bakar 2006a)

THE MALAYSIAN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES

Agriculture and ago-based industry have been the mainstay of the Malaysian
economy until the early 1980’s when the then Premier, Dr Mahathir Mohammed
with his Vision 2020, envisaged Malaysia as a developed industrialized country
comes the year 2020. With that vision, agriculture was then labeled as the
“sunset industry”, sidelined in favour of industrialization. However, agriculture
remains an important part of the national economy in the new millennium for the
increasingly burgeoning populace with the challenge to provide both food
security and safety, and sustainable development and wealth creation. With
increasingly burgeoning economy and populace, agriculture then took the
backstage roles in the economic development agenda, unparallel even in the
industrialized countries of Europe, Japan, and North America. The Mahathir era
witnessed the rising of import food bills to the tune and in excess of US$5
billion/year. Such monumental increase in food import bills saw policy makers
making u-turns in agricultural development policy vis-à-vis industrialization in the
post Mahathir era, when the government led by Abdullah Badawi put great
emphasis on agricultural development focusing principally on food production in
the country to off-set imports.
With this re-emphasis, agriculture and agro-based industry has evolved
from a stereotypic Third World peasantry economic entity into the vibrant third
engine of economic growth contributing no less than US$5.63, 6.34, 7.75, and
8.48 billion to the national GDP in 2003, 2005, 2007 and 2008, respectively
(Table 1, Figs. 1 & 2). These were translated as merely 10.3, 8.7 and 9.7% of
the GNP in 200, 2005 and 2008, respectively. In the same vein came the
repackaging of the New Agricultural Policy (NAP1, NAP2 and NAP3)(Anon ).
These NAPs are fine-tuned towards self-sufficiency in food along with parallel
increase in cash crops production for export and downstream agro-industrial
activities. The dualism in characters of Malaysian agriculture, viz. smallholder’s

338
sector with an average farm size of 1 - 2 ha, and the plantation-based estate
sector with farm sizes in excess of 500 ha calls for dichotomy in policies of
agricultural industry. While the estate-based agriculture placed great economic

Table 1. Malaysian agricultural GDP vis-à-vis the national GDP (RM billion at
constant 1978 prices) (1980 – 2008)*
_____________________________________________________________________________

Year GDP Agricultural share of

National GDP (%)

National Agricultural
________________________________________________________________

1980 44.514 10.190 22.9

1985 57.093 11.854 20.8
1990 79.329 14.826 20.4
1995 120.489 17.115 13.9
2000 143.566 18.154 10.3
2005 231.034 20.018 8.7
2008 287.098 27.892 9.7
_____________________________________________________________________________

* Economic Reports (1980/81, 1990/91; 1994/95; 1999/2000; 2002/2003, 2004/2005;

2005/2006; 2007/2008 Ministry of Finance, Malaysia

2008**
2005
2000
Year

1995
GDP Agricultural
1990 GDP National
1985
1980

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

RM (billion)

Fig. 1. The Malaysian agricultural GDP vis-à-vis the national GDP.

339
 Agricultural share of national GDP

2008**
Agricultural
share of
2000 national GDP
Year

1990

1980

0 5 10 15 20 25
As % of total National GDP

Fig. 2. The Malaysian agricultural GDP (%) vis-à-vis the % of national GDP.

emphasis on cash crops, namely oil palm, rubber, and cocoa, the small-scale
farmers focused principally on sizeable acreages of the arable lands are planted
with food crops like rice, pepper, fruit orchards, vegetables, and herbs. The
notable exception to this dualistic nature of farming activities that farmers under
the Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA) and Rubber Small Industry
Development Authority (RISDA) are engaged with a blend of both estate-based
agriculture and food production pursuits. Large estates are always at risk from
the vagaries of labour supply, while small farms faced the problems of economy
of scale in production and profitability. The estates and small-scale farms
account for more than 98.5% or 5.78 million ha of agricultural land in the country.
The Malaysian farming sector is faced with perennial scarcity of domestic human
labour brought about by rural-urban migration and increasingly burgeoning
population, and demand by industrial sector for skilled/semi-skilled labour. Such
scarcity is augmented by the importation of foreign labour principally from
Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Bangladesh.
Table 2 and Fig. 3 show the acreages of major crop commodities in
Malaysian agriculture over the years. Invariably, there were gradual increase in
areas planted with oil palm, fruits, often at the expense of rubber and cocoa
principally, and other crops as well. Changes in the acreages of these major crop
commodities were translated into parallel decline in production. For example, in
1990, rubber production was ca. 1,292K tonnes valued at RM3,028 million, while
the estimated parallel figures for 2008 were 567K tones valued at RM9236
million. The opposite trends were registered for oil palm with production figures

340
of ca. 6,094.6 K and 17,667.1 K tonnes valued at RM4,272 million and RM
31,223 for 1990 and 2008, respectively (Table 3).

Table 2. Acreages under rubber, oil palm, cocoa, rice, vegetables and fruit
orchards (‘000 ha) in Malaysia (1990 – 2008)**.
_____________________________________________________________________________

Year Rubber Oil Palm Cocoa Rice Vegetables Fruit

_____________________________________________________________________________

1980 n/a* 1,000.0 123.8 n/a n/a n/a

1985 n/a 1,567.0 303.9 n/a n/a n/a
1990 1,837.0 2,029.5 393.5 400.0 26.3 167.9
1995 1,727.0 2,507.6 234.5 690.9 42.0 253.5
2000 1,430.7 3,460.0 105.0 674.4 51.4 307.6
2005 1,301.5 3,100.0 105.0 611.0 77.3 385.6
2008 1,211.3 3,433.6 108.7 566.78 89.6 392.2
_____________________________________________________________________________

*n/a – Data not available,

** Economic Reports (1980/81, 1990/91; 1994/95; 1999/2000; 2002/2003, 2004/2005;
2005/2006; 2007/2008 Ministry of Finance, Malaysia

2008**

2005
Fruit
2000 Vegetables
Rice
Year

1995
Cocoa
1990 Oil Palm
Rubber
1985

1980

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Hectare ('000)

Fig. 3. Areas under different major crops in Malaysia (1980 – 2008)

341
Pesticide use in Malaysia increased from RM289 million in 1995 to RM403
million in 2008 (Table 4). Herbicides capture >76% of the total market. This
indicates the relative importance of weeds as dominant pests in the Malaysian
agriculture as well as reflecting the dependence on herbicides in the country for
weed management, principally in estates for the past three to four decades in oil
palm, rubber, cocoa, and rice and cereals, vegetable farms and fruit orchards.
Such trends of increasing dependence on pesticides for pest management in the
Malaysia is a common cause for environmental concern, and with records of
parallel increase in incidences of pesticide resistance pests and millennial
weeds, while the rightful fear for the possible loss of beneficial organisms, and
almost total disappearance of fresh water fish in the rice granaries, and
increased environmental pollutions of rivers and waterways (Baki 2006, 2008).
The challenge to produce agricultural products that are relatively free from
pesticides, especially the use of environmentally-benign pesticides and
agrichemicals is part of the concern among policy makers, environmentalists,
agriculturalists and agriculturists alike in light of the scarcity of domestic labour
supply and increasing dependence on foreign labour.

Table 3. Production (‘000 tonnes) and export value (RM million) (in brackets) of
natural rubber, oil palm, cocoa, and rice (1985– 2008).
_____________________________________________________________________________

Year Rubber Oil Palm Cocoa Rice *

1985 n/a n/a 108.0 (600) 1,626.7 (1,180.7)

1990 1,292 (3,028) 6,094.6 (4,272) 247.0 (756) 1,926.4 (1,690.0)
1995 1,089 (4,045) 7,810.5 (11,505) 131.5 (626) 2,127.3 (1,755.2)
2000 750 (2,100) 10,553.9 (17,692) 90.0 (769) 1,940.0 (1,600.7)
2005 556 (8,885) 15,550.2 (28,673) 95.2 (989) 2,122.4 (1,745.1)
2008 567 (9236) 17,667.1 (31,223) 96.3 (923) 2,118.9 (3,178.4)
_____________________________________________________________________________

* Including the government subsidy of RM185/tonnes, net import.

Table 4. Pesticides use in Malaysia in RM million (1995 –2008)*

_____________________________________________________________________________

Year Herbicides Insecticides Fungicides Rodenticides Total

_____________________________________________________________________________

1995 220 43 15 11 289

2000 275 76 25 18 394
2005 256 75 23 18 372
2008 278 82 26 17 403
_____________________________________________________________________________

* Malaysian Crop Care & Public Health Association (MCPA).

342
 The ensuing discussion focuses on contemporary issues that shaped
Malaysian agriculture and agro-based industry in the new millennium. The
discussion also focused on New Agricultural Policy (NAP1, NAP2, and NAP3),
the education and R & D in Malaysian agriculture. This communication ends with
a note on the challenges faced by the industry, and steps taken to overcome
such challenges in the new millennium.

WHAT SHAPES THE FUTURE OF MALAYSIAN AGRICULTURE

Malaysian agriculture, like those in many countries is shaped by several factors,

viz. (i) Status of the natural resource base, (ii) Climate change, (iii) Extent of land
degradation, (iv) Advances in science and technology, (v) Urbanization, (vi)
Trade liberalization and commercialization, and (vii) Strategic alliances and
international agreements and conventions. These factors would influence
agricultural development in the country in a holistic manner, although the effect
and intensity of influence of each factor may vary accordingly. Invariably,
agricultural development faces three major global challenges in the new
millennium: (i) Persistence of poverty and food insecurity; (ii) Globalization and
its impact on the eventual transformation of traditional agricultural systems, and
(iii) Continuing and perennial pressure on the deterioration of the natural
resource base. The agricultural production capacity in Malaysia, in effect, will be
tapping three principal sources of growth, viz. (i) Expanding the arable land area;
(ii) Increasing cropping intensity (mostly through irrigation); and (iii) Boosting
yields. This is made possible as Malaysian agricultural landscapes are yet to
approach the ceiling for all the three sources at the local scale. However, the
intrinsic geopolitical unevenly distribution of available land in Sabah, Sarawak
and Peninsular Malaysia coupled with the equally unequal population
concentrations in these regions, and locally-mediated consumer demands for
agricultural produce and inputs reflect the present state of agricultural
development in the country. This present state is echoed by Anon (2003) where
enough unused potential farmland at the regional scale, of which only ca. 11%
(5.78 million ha) of all land is used in crop production. Out of this, ca. 36% of the
arable land to some degree are suitable for crop production and ca. 18.92 million
ha of arable land remains with crop production potential.
Reflections of the regional- or population-mediated pressure needing the
arable land may not have it. This is especially true in the Klang Valley of
Selangor and Federal Territories. In several situations, much of the land also
suffers from (a) ecological fragility and in hilly areas of steep terrain of Sarawak
and Sabah; (b) low fertility in acid sulphate, peat and heavy clay soils; (c) coastal
areas prone to flooding and seepage of saline water; (d) toxicity in ex-tin mining
land, acid sulphate soils; (e) high incidence of disease as exemplified by ex-
pepper land prone to root disease and nematodes; (f) lack of infrastructure in the
rural areas of Sabah, Sarawak, Pahang, and Kelantan. Any attempt to ameliorate
these problem soils requires high investments to be made accessible or disease-
free.

343
 In Malaysia and elsewhere, the general trend in agriculture production is
usually towards sustainable intensification, as opposed to dependence on land
expansion. Baki (2006a) argued that 80% of increments in crop production in
Malaysia come from intensification mediated through higher crop yields,
increased multiple cropping and shorter fallow period. The agricultural production
programme through intensification is intimately linked with the availability of
labour and fertilizer-use efficiency. Labour is a central issue pertaining to the
future of agriculture and its ensuing sustainable development. The general trend
in Malaysia and elsewhere is towards increasing farm labour scarcities due to
rapid migration to urban areas, and increasingly burgeoning populace,
demanding better pay and competition for labour by industrial sectors. Invariably
it follows that intensification of agriculture adds to labour demand and scarcity.
This calls for growing demand for labour-saving technologies.
Baki (2006) suggested three areas that are particularly critical in shapiung
the future of Malaysian agriculture, and these include biotechnology,
technologies capable of supporting sustainable agriculture, and directions of
future research and opportunities for increasing the competitiveness of
agriculture in the country vis-à-vis the neighbouring countries in the ASEAN in
particular and in Asia in general. The employment of a biotechnology tool of
genetic engineering (GE) - a technique which allows genes to be transferred from
one species to another leading to the production of genetically modified
organisms (GMOs) calls for big investments in manpower training and acquiring
the technology through innovative research by the locals. The potential GM crops
in Malaysia include oil palm (Basta® tolerance), papaya and banana (virus
resistance) and rice (IMI Rice)(imidazolinone resistance). In 2003, scientists at
the Malaysian Palm Oil Board has successfully produced a GM oil palm using the
microprojectile bormbardment method which made it possible to produce oil palm
with value added fatty acids and novel metabolites through genetic engineering
(Kadir 2003). The rice breeders in the Malaysian Agricultural Research Institute
(MARDI) through conventional breeding have produced five imidazolinone
tolerant lines purification and evaluation for resistance against the major pests
and diseases. The locally developed herbicide tolerant rice (HTR) cultivars are
expected to be released to rice farmers in the off-season 2009 or 2010. Further
evaluations on yield, agronomic performances and physical and chemical
properties of the grain, including nutritive constituents are being made. Our
immediate concern is the possible introgression of undesirable genes from HTR
cultivars to weedy rices, making the later resistant to imidazolinone herbicides. If
this happens, then our weedy rices will become “super-weeds” and the
insurmountable problems associated with them are likely to prevail.
Of course the production of GM crops needs to overcome the species
barrier and utilization of genetic tools giving GE tremendous power but so
controversial not only to consumers but also to the unknown and untold effects to
the environment. Moreover, there is a continuous debate and general concern
and implications on health, environment, socio-economic, and ethics. Again the
Malaysian initiatives on these crops have not to date overcome the socio-
economic and ethical barrier that may influence the local and overseas markets
for these products.

344
 There are emerging issues associated with GM crops that Malaysia either
as an importing consumer nation or a potential producer need to address or be
concerned of. These include (i) Coexistence: cultivation of conventional, organic
agriculture and GM crops; (ii) Labeling: detection limits and traceability of
adventitious presence of GM materials; (iii) Liability and redress: the needs to
consider their legal system and relevant international agreements; and (iv)
Pharming: production of pharmaceutical products in plants, e.g. vaccines in
bananas. In effect, the welfare of farming community together with the
consumers at large in Malaysia are affected by the way policy makers and
advisors, and funding agencies conduct themselves and their policies with
respect to the adherence of an integrated multi-disciplinary research approach in
biological sciences including genetic engineering along side conventional
breeding and agronomy, but also the socio-economic context where farming
occurs. This is where the societal goals of agriculture would have the greatest
impact on the society.
Regardless of the emerging technologies and issues associated with
sustainable agricultural development in the country hinges very much on future
trends and expansion of conservation technologies comprising (i) Good
Agricultural Practices (GAP); (ii) Integrated Production Systems; (iii) Integrated
Pest Management (IPM); (iv) Integrated Plant Nutrient System (IPNS); (iv) No
Till/Conservation Agriculture (NT/CA); (v) Organic Agriculture; and (vi) Urban and
Peri-Urban Agriculture.
Two other central factors that may shape the future of agricultural
development in Malaysia include irrigation and water availability. These are
especially crucial to food production and supplies in Malaysia. The National
Water Board envisaged that the states of Perlis, Penang, Selangor, Federal
Territory K. Lumpur, Malacca, and Negeri Sembilan may face water shortage in
2030, and this calls for greater efficiency in water use. This is echoed by Baki
(2006) who argued that access to water and food security are dramatically linked.
In the Klang Valley in Selangor and the Federal Territories, population pressure
aggravates the water situation further.
Other important factors that may also shape the future of agricultural
development in Malaysia, inter-alia, include the continuing urbanization, trade
liberalization, and commercialization of agriculture-related activities in the
country. The increasingly burgeoning, affluent and urbanized Malaysians require
rapid growth in urban food demand; diversification of diets towards high-value
food products; transformation of food production and delivery systems, and
increased resource competition and conflict for land, water, and labour. Further,
trade liberation in world trade hinges very much on binding international
agreements, viz. WTO Agreement on Globalization and Trade Liberalization;
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture;
International Plant Protection Convention; Rotterdam Convention; Agreement on
the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures; the Cartagena Protocol
on Bio-safety; the Codex Alimentarius, and the Code of Conduct for Distribution
and Use of Pesticides. These international agreements would have
consequential effects on the way agricultural activities/industries are conducted,
including (i) access to, and transfer of plant genetic materials and technologies;

345
(ii) prevention on spread and introduction and control of pests of plants and
plant products; (iii) export and import of hazardous substances; (iv) protection of
human or animal life or health from risks arising from additives, contaminants,
toxins or disease-causing organisms in foods, beverages or feedstuffs; (v)
precautionary approach to protect Malaysia for their biodiversity resources; (vi)
protecting the health of consumers and ensuring fair practices in the food trade;
and (vii) establishment of Code of Conduct with strict adherence of protocols on
the distribution and use of pesticide; although these are already adopted by
some pesticide companies. One way to overcome these binding international
agreements is to develop a win-win strategic alliances and international
agreements and conventions either bilaterally or with trading partners within the
contexts of (i) World Trade Organization (WTO); (ii) United Nations Conventions
on Biological Diversity (UNCBD);(iii) Climate Change and Combating
Diversification (CCCD); (iv) International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC); (v)
Rotterdam Convention; and (vi) International Treaty of Plant Genetic Resources
for Food and Agriculture.

NEW AGRICULTURAL POLICY (NAP1, NAP2, NAP3) REVISITED

The New Agricultural Policy (NAP1, NAP2 and NAP3)(1984 – 2010)(Anon 1984,
Anon 1992, Anon 1998) inherits its policy framework and development plan from
the Green Book Programme (GBP) (1974-1983) (later on renamed as Green
Earth Plan) (GEP) launched by Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, the then Prime
Minister of Malaysia in 1974. The core objectives of GBP-GEP include increase
food production enough for national needs, maximization of land use through
estate farming; encourage full participation by farmers in planting short-term
food crops, alternated with maize, sorghum, ground nuts, other food crops;
encourage rearing of chickens, ducks, cattle, goats, sheep & fresh water
aquaculture; and national saving of US$200 million/year of vegetable imports.
These objectives are met through several steps of implementation, viz. (i) activity
focus on land use, crops planted and target production/yields; (ii) coordinated
effort at village level through Department of Agriculture, FAMA, Small holders
Rubber Industry Development Authority (RISDA), and Farmers Association
Authority (FAA); (iii) upgrading marketing strategies through the Federal
Agricultural Marketing Agency (FAMA), and other agricultural agencies; (iv)
progress and implementation monitored by District Action Committee up to the
state level; and (v) National Green Book Secretariat to monitor progress at
national level.
Principally, the NAPs are the guiding principles for Malaysia to stay
competitive in the agriculture and agro-based industry while providing food
security at affordable price for the populace, albeit burgeoning in their socio-
economic status.
NAPs – Focus. While NAP1 focuses on (i) commercialization of farming
activities; (ii) greater emphasis on food sufficiency; (iii) restructuring of
Agricultural Bank, FAMA, and Farmers Association Authority, MARDI; (iv)
opening up more Integrated Agricultural Development Projects (IADP); and (v)
opening up new land & in-situ rehabilitation of existing farm lands, the NAP2 and

346
NAP3 focus on (i) food security and food safety (food scarcity) (FSFS); (ii)
increase efficiency of food & commercial cash crops productivity; (iii) growth
and development of downstream agro-based industries and job creation to
augment inter-sectorial growth; and (iv) liberalization policy for equity investment
by foreign investors. It is imperative to highlight here that the NAPs were meant
to complement and to be implemented in tandem with the other development
policies such as The National Development Policy, The Second Industrial Master
Plan, The Science and Technology Policy, and the National Biodiversity Policy in
the national economic development for global competitiveness and better quality
of life towards its developed status in 2020.
NAPs – Aims and Objectives. The principal aims of the NAPs are multi-
facets with the provision of sustainable good forestry and agriculture practices,
human resource development including in new and emerging areas of
agricultural sciences as well as professional farm managers for large-scale
farming enterprises. These NAPs are private-sector driven while the public-sector
would facilitate and enhance the delivery of support services required. Further,
the NAPs also aimed at maximization of income through the optimal utilization of
resources in the sector including maximizing agriculture’s contribution to national
income and export earnings as well as maximizing income of producers. Among
the objectives of the NAPs include the (i) development of new agricultural
industries and products from primary commodities and natural resources through
R&D; (ii) development of new high value products from agricultural commodities
as well as agricultural waste and by-products, creating new markets; (iii) increase
in export earnings; (iv) integration of agro-forestry development; (iv) increase in
the production of major food products to enhance food security and better food
quality at affordable prices; (v) enhancement of food security for the populace
and the nation; (vi) increase productivity and competitiveness of the sector, while
at the same time (vii) deepen linkages with other sectors; (viii) create new
sources of growth for the sector, and (ix) conserve and utilize natural resources
on a sustainable basis.
NAPs – Policy Thrusts and Approaches. In the formulation of the NAPs,
several key policy thrusts were highlighted so as not to deviate from the main
targets as envisaged by policy makers in the government. These policy thrusts
include, inter-alia, include (a) meeting national food requirements or food security
through large food production by the private sector; (b) enhancing
competitiveness and profitability in agriculture and forestry promoting globally
competitive industries in agriculture and forestry, developing world competitive
outlook and an export- oriented culture; (c) capitalizing on the product value-
chain by reorientation from commodity-based to product-based production and
marketing, capital and technology intensive agricultural production system and
less labour intensive enterprises as well as cultivation of high-value crops and
forest species; (d) enhancing the integrated development of the food and
industrial crop subsectors-resources such as land, labour and waste as well as
by-products can be exploited. Need enhancement of R&D in waste and by-
product utilization and commercialization of these R&D findings; (e)
strengthening requisite economic foundation- up-grading quality of human
resources, development of indigenous R&D capabilities and technology such as

347
IT, modern infrastructure, business support services, financing and incentives
and an enabling institutional framework; and (f) adopting sustainable
development-rules, regulations and incentives to be strengthened with emphasis
on R&D on appropriate technologies.
The approaches outlined in the NAPs must be in tandem with meeting the
aims and objectives. As such the agro-forestry approach aimed at addressing
scarce resources like land and raw materials, and at the same time the product-
based approach to support and compliment the cluster- based agro-industrial
development as identified by the Second Industrial Master Plan, strengthening
inter- and intra-sectorial linkages including development and expansion of
intermediate and supporting industries.

AGRICULTURE-RELATED MINISTRIES AND AGENCIES

There are four minisries at the federal level that deal with agricultural
developement in the country. These include the Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-
based Industry, Ministry of Plantation Industry, Ministry of Regional and Rutrla
Development, and Ministry of Natural Resources nad Environment. These
ministries are supported by the Miniitry of Science, Technolgy and Innovation for
research and development while the Ministry of International Trade and Industry
are involved in the international marketing of the agro-produce. Each ministry has
several agencies that deals with the implementation of government development
programmes and policies from research to extension activities. For example, the
Malaysian Agricutural Research and Development Institute (MARDI) deals with
all aspects of research and development for all crops and animals except,
rubber, oil palm, pepper and cocoa. The Malaysian Palm Oil Board
copncentrates on research and developement of the oil palm industry in the
country. On top of these the government link companies and public-funded
agencies also deal with on-going crop-based development of the industry. The
former is best exemplified by Sime Darby Plantation, while the later by the
Federal Land Developement Authority (FELDA) or the Federal Land
Rehabilitation and Comsodilation Autority (FELCRA).

AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION, GAP, AND R & D

IN THE MALAYSIAN AGRICULTURE

Agricultural development in Malaysia started long before the coming of European

colonizers. For example, Wan Mat Saman started the initial irrigation and
drainage networks for rice planting in early 1800’s in northern state of Kedah.
The irrigation and drainage canals serve dual purposes for agricultural activities
and transport. The ensuing progress in agricultural development was due to
proper planning by the ruling government since independence in 1957. This
planning and execution of the development plans, otherwise known as Malaysian
Development Plan 1 through Malaysian Development Plan 9 (RM1 – RM9). The
initial development plans focused on opening up new lands for the landless,
known as the Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA), soon to be followed

348
by the setting up of other land development agencies such as FELCRA, RISDA,
SELCRA, SALCRA, etc.
Serious scientific research in agriculture started in late 1900’s with the
planting of rubber by R. N. Ridley ad his team, and the planting of oil palm in big
scale in early 1970’s. Research on food crops focused initially with the
development of new rice varieties by Dept. of Agriculture in 1960s, and by
MARDI from 1970s onwards. Planters in Harrison and Crosfield, Sime Darby,
Golden Hope, Guthrie, etc. started agronomic research and development of high
yielding rubber clones in Chemara Research Station and Prang Besar Research
Station, among others. The Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia (RRIM) and
Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia (PORIM) played pivotal roles in the
scientific development of rubber and oil palm as leading cash crop commodities
in the country .Research on food crops focused initially with the development of
new rice varieties by Dept. of Agriculture in 1960s, and by MARDI from 1970s
onwards. Research activities on other crops like cocoa, coconut, pepper,
vegetables and fruits follow suit
Agricultural Education. There are 24 public and government-funded
private universities and university colleges in Malaysia but only a handful of them
offer courses related to agriculture, forestry food science, and veterinary
medicine, while 6 Agriculture institutes and 78 Secondary Agricultural Vocational
Schools Offering certificate courses in agriculture, food science, and veterinary
medicine. The public universities offering forestry, agricultural engineering,
agriculture- and food-science related courses at the diploma, BSc, MSc, PhD
levels include Universiti Malaya, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Universiti Putra
Malaysia, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Universiti
Malaysia Sarawak, Universiti Malaysia Trengganu, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan,
and Universiti Teknologi MARA.
Good Agricultural Practice (GAP). A central issue in the chartered
development of agriculture in Malaysia is the need for sound scientific research
programme from basic agronomic and horticultural levels to state-of-the-art
technological advancement in biotechnology and engineering. This is only made
possible through research and with the implementation of the Good Agricultural
Practice (GAP) (Fig. 4) by the agriculturalists and agriculturists, policy makers
and extension agents. This is especially crucial for export-oriented crops meeting
not only the standards of importing countries and their consumers but also for the
local populace in terms of food safety and food security in line with the need to
preserve the environment for sustainable development of the agriculture and
agro-based industry.
A strong commitment to the GAP both in concept and in practice in the
overall development in Malaysia is exemplified by a government link agency, the
Sime Darby Plantation. This commitment is manifested by strong adherence to
safety standards to ensure sustainable development and environmental safety
by the way its plantation business is run by Sime Darby Plantation.
To ensure sustainability of its business, Sime Darby Plantation implements good
agricultural practices covering all aspects of (i) Land Management; (ii) Water
Management; (iii) Zero Burning Replanting Technique; (iv) Integrated Pest

349
Management; (v) Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment System; (vi) High Conservation
Value Forests In The Estates; (vii) Biodiversity; and (viii) Quality Assurance.

Water quality, Soil quality,

Crop productivity,
Biodiversity,
Energy efficiency

Agro-system Health
Indicators

Components of
Integrated Weed
Management

Modeling crop-weed interaction

Tillage, Cultivation, Cover Crops
Herbicides, Crop Breeding
Planting Patterns, Fertilizers
Crop Rotation

Fig. 4. Components of Good Agricultural Practice in modern agriculture (Baki

2006b)

Agricultural development Under Malaysian Development Plans.

Interestingly agriculture gets a reasonable amount of developmental budget
since the First Malaysian Developmental Plan (MDP1)(1966-1970). For example,
in MDP2 and MDP 3, the allocation for agricultural development amounted to RM
RM8,747.68 million of which RM4,849.30 was for land development, irrigation
and drainage, replanting of tree crops like rubber, oil palm, cocoa, etc. Research

350
activities and funding were principally parked at MARDI (RM500 million), Palm
Oil Research Institute (PORIM, RM220 million), and Rubber Research Institute of
Malaysia (RRIM) with RM275 million allocation.
Measurable progress was recorded for the MDP2 and MDP3 with value-
added growth of ca. 4.3% p.a. contributing no less than 22.2% to GDP in 1980,
and 35.5% of GDP from the export of agricultural produce. About ew Jobs:
352,300 new jobs were created or 20.8% new employment opportunities for the
decade, mostly from FELDA, FELCRA and State land Development Schemes.
Replanting of rubber and other crops amounted to ca. 302,900 ha with rubber by
RISDA, Sabah Rubber Fund Board and the Sarawak Land Consolidation and
Rehabilitation Authority (SALCRA). About 8,000 ha replanted with coconut and
7,000 ha with pineapple, while FELCRA rehabilitated 10,3000 ha of rubber and
padi. For the same period 31 palm oil mills were commissioned by FELDA and
FELCRA.
With almost similar budget allocation in the MDP4, ensuing progress in
agricultural development were recorded in the country. These were exemplified
by 1,427,500 ha was developed for mixed cropping and diversified farm activities
for 445,045 families; 141,500 ha for replanting by RISDA; 8,300 ha for cocoa and
coffee, FELCRA and SALCRA rehabilitated 60,700 ha for oil palm and cocoa.
The sate land development schemes developed no less than 240,00 ha for oil
palm & rubber, cocoa and other crops.
The MDP5 saw a slightly bigger allocation of RM7,807 million for
agricultural development was given. The parallel figures for MDP6, MDP7 and
MDP8, and MDP9 were RM8,894.3 million, RM8,286.9 million, RM7,860.0
million and RM11,435 million, respectively. In terms of growth performance or
expected growth performance, the MDP8 registered valued-added growth
increase of the agricultural sector by 1.2% p.a., principally from oil palm at 7.9%
with contribution to NGDP by 10.3% (1995) and 8.7% (2000) valued at RM11.7
billion (1995) and RM10 billion (2000), respectively. The sector contributed about
RM21.6 billion (1995) to RM22.9 billion (2000) principally from oil palm in export.
The sector also consumed labour by 1.5 million (1995) with a slight drop in 1.4
million (2000). The land use increased from 5.7 million ha (1995) to 6.0 million
ha (2000) principally for oil palm , rubber, pepper, tobacco, vegetables, fruits in
Sabah and Sarawak. Land conversion ca. 430, 000 ha rubber/cocoa farms
converted to oil palm and other uses. The discrepancy in export versus import of
food items widens with export increasing marginally by 8.7% from RM4.4 billion
(1995) RM6.6 billion (2000), while imports increased from RM7.8 billion (1995)
RM13 billion (2000).
In MDP9, the expected growth of the agricultural sector in terms of value-
added growth, contribution to national GDP and exports are as follow: the
valued-added growth of agricultural sector increased 3.0% p.a. with contribution
to NGDP at 8.7% (RM16.9 billion) in 2000 and 8.2%(RM38.7 billion) in 2005.
The export value increased by 8.7% p.a. at RM45.58 billion (2000) to RM115.65
billion by the end of MDP9 in 2005.
Tables 5 and 6 show the budget allocations and value-added growth of
the agricultural sector for the MDP8 and MDP9 in Malaysia. The progress and

351
expected progress in land development and consolidation and rehabilitation in
MDP8 and MDP9 of Malaysia is shown in Table 7.

Table 5. Budget allocations and NGDP to consumers in the Agricultural and

Agricultural-based Industries in MDP8 and MDP9 of Malaysia*.
________________________________________________________________

Commodity Allocations (RM million)

________________________________________________________________

2000 2005 2010

________________________________________________________________

Agriculture 16,662 21,585 27,517

Agro-based industry 13,584 16,928 22,221

Total 30,246 38,513 49,738

NGDP to Consumers 210,558 262,029 351,297

________________________________________________________________

* Agricultural Statistics, Min. of Agric & Agro-based Industry, Malaysia (2007)

Table 6. Value-added growth from the agricultural and agricultural-based

industries in MDP8 and MDP9 of Malaysia.
________________________________________________________________

Commodity Export value (RM million)

________________________________________________________________

2000 2005 2010

________________________________________________________________

Agricultural export 22,892 37,421 54,992

Agro-based industry export 24,086 37,442 60,060

Total (agric & agro-based) 46,978 74,863 115,052

Total export 373,270 533,790 803,163

________________________________________________________________

* Agricultural Statistics, Min. of Agric & Agro-based Industry, Malaysia (2007)

352
Table 7. Progress and expected progress in land development and consolidation
and rehabilitation in MDP8 and MDP9 of Malaysia*.
________________________________________________________________
Programme 8MP 9MP
______________ ______ __________________ ________ __________________ ___________

Target** Achievement** % Target %

______________ ______ __________________ ________ __________________ ___________

Replanting 306,010 237,603 77.6 383,010 78.9

Consolidation & 50,640 31,332 61.9 102,663 21.1

Rehabilitation

Total 356,650 288,935 75.4 485,673 100.0

______________ ______ __________________ ________ __________________ ___________

* Agricultural Statistics, Min. of Agric & Agro-based Industry, Malaysia (2007)

** In hectares.

ISSUES IN MODERN MALAYSIAN AGRICULTURE

Malaysian agriculture is at the crossroads. While there is the need to modernise

agriculture, the prevailing dualism in Malaysian agriculture, where the needs for
small holders’ agriculture may differ from those large-scale farming of the
estates, the government-promulgated NAPs need to cater for both. Despite
facing with the vagaries of labour supply, agriculture remains an important part of
the national economy in the new millennium for the increasingly burgeoning
populace with the challenge to provide both food security and safety, and
sustainable development and wealth creation. The primary issues besieging
Malaysian agriculture in the new millennium include ensuring food security and
food safety for the populace with parallel and determined effort to sustain, and
where possible, increase exports of agricultural produce. Albeit the apparent
decline in contribution of agricultural sector to the Malaysian national economy,
the development of agriculture in Malaysia, faces three major challenges in new
millennium (i) Food Scarcity and Food Security (FSFS); (ii) Agricultural
Sustainability; and (iii) Environmental Health. More importantly, the apparently
perennial overriding concern of prime importance arising from the above include
(i) How do we feed the increasingly burgeoning populace from domestic sources
of food yet attaining sustainability in production and maintaining environmental
health? (ii) How does Malaysia divorce itself from increasingly dependent on food

353
imports? To the producers and farmers, the relevant question would be: How do
we increase productivity and profit without incurring extra production cost? The
environmentalists and nature lovers, they would pose question such as “How
does sustainability in food production affect environmental health?” The answers
to these questions and related issues may impact the ensuing development and
progress in agriculture in Malaysia.

Specific and Underlying Issues - Trends and Reality. For many emerging
industrialized nations like Malaysia, it is disturbing to note that food scarcity and
food security are synonymous with 21st century agriculture. This notion is
fortified by Malaysia’s monumental import food bills in excess of RM15 billion
annually, and is synonymous with the lingering concern for FSFS to feed the
growing populace. The need for intensification of agriculture due to increasingly
limited arable land is growing with parallel population growth. With intensification
come the continuing pressure on, and the deterioration of natural resource-base.
Some of the current issues facing Malaysian agriculture in general and pest
management practices in particular include increased (i) problems environmental
pollutions due to wide spread use of agrichemicals; (ii) incidences of the
herbicide-resistant and noxious millennial weeds; (iii) water shortage; (iv)
technology divide between the plantation-based sector and the small farmers.
Together these disturbing trends will have lasting impact on the socio-economic
well-being of the farming community and consumers alike.
As a trading nation, Malaysia imports no less than RM15 billion worth of
food annually and this of course impacts negatively on the balance of trade.
Insufficient and inconsistent production of the food items is construed as a
primary reason for this high import food bills. Another teething issue facing
Malaysian agriculture especially on food items meant for the export markets such
aquaculture and animal products, vegetable and fruits, is the need to meet
quality standard for international markets. At the local fronts, the increasingly
burgeoning population with the parallel increase in per capita income and
awareness of a balance diet and health consciousness of people changing taste
and food preferences would mean the need for adequate supply of safe,
nutritious and high quality food at affordable prices, and this high demand may
lead to high food prices. Moreover, with the intensification in agriculture comes
the need for affordable labour. Malaysia faces acute labour shortage leading to
employment of and to certain extent dependent on foreign workers, another
indirect way of loss of foreign exchange. The low labour productivity of only 60%
compared to the manufacturing sector is another disadvantage of the agricultural
sector. This is very real among smallholders’ sector which experienced low
labour productivity and uneconomic farm sizes. Because of this lack of domestic
production plus inconsistent supply caused small and medium scale agro-based
firms operating below capacity, there is a need to strengthen inter- and intra-
sectorial linkages with the support of downstream industries. If this scenario of
the economic scale and low labour productivity of small- and medium-size farms
can be improved, augmented by the strengthened inter- and intra-sector linkages
with the support of downstream industries, the present exports consisting mainly
of primary and intermediate products and high import of raw materials for food

354
processing industries, and limited development of high value-added resource-
based products can be turned into highly profitable agriculture inline with the as
echoed by Baki (2006a) that “Agriculture is business, and it is profitable”. As with
any business marketing promotion of Malaysian products both for domestic and
foreign markets is a continuous process.
Diminishing suitable agricultural lands is inevitable. This is even so
pressing with increasing population growth competition for land is a common
phenomenon worldwide including Malaysia. While we have the common scene of
agricultural lands being converted to industrial, residential and urban uses, there
is this perennial problem of idle agricultural land and abandon holdings in the
country. Land in Malaysia is under the jurisdiction of the state. Under the present
political climate and essentially bipartition politics or real politic, there is always
this political innuendos when comes to land issues between the federal
government at one end, and the sate governments on another. For those
intending to acquire land for agricultural venture at commercial scale, the slow
process in acquiring land is antithesis to this effort, not forgetting the financial
constraints of such acquisition may pose. The environmental concerns and the
need for more efficient agricultural and forestry practices for sustainable
development of the sector are no less important.
At the global scale, the very existence of WTO and AFTA, for which
Malaysia is a signatory to both free trade frameworks among trading nations of
today, greater competition for increasingly competitive markets are the rules of
the game that Malaysian farmers are subjected to. Disguised as preferential tariff
schemes coupled with the discriminatory tariff and non-tariff barriers among
trading blocs worldwide, Malaysian farmers are at a disadvantage unless the
government pump in funds to help small- and medium-scale farmers to compete
to market their produce at competitive prices.
Intrigues and Challenges. In a democratic dominion like Malaysia, the
most appropriate question being asked by man in the street is the context of
FSFS, “Is there a choice for the hungry and destitute”? In the same vein, “Does
the responsible government of increasingly globalized world channel enough
funds to upgrade and modernize agriculture to produce not just enough but
surplus food so that hunger and famine will no longer haunt our populace despite
signs of prosperity and burgeoning economy in Malaysia”? Encountering FSFS in
Malaysia over the next two decades will depend on (i) Emphasis placed on
agricultural research; (ii) Dynamics of change and advances and development
made in science and technology; and (iii) Economic policy reforms. It is only
expedient that policy makers, agriculturalists and research scientists both in the
government and private sectors should set research directions in agricultural
science in the country so as to generate knowledge-based and systems
approach-based decision, at least in principal economic crops, and most
importantly on security food crops like rice and other cereals, vegetables, animal
and aquaculture so as to meet the needs of FSFS. It is equally important that
those in the corridors of power and influence and the technocrats realize soon
enough of the sheer need to strategize the development of effective agricultural
management entails full understanding of the fundamental relationships between
agronomic practices, water management and crop care, and management of

355
pests, weeds in Malaysian agricultural systems. These endeavours require
strong will among policy makers and agricultural scientists by strategizing action
plans by ensuring food security for the populace.

REFERENCES

Anon (1984). National Agricultural Policy 1. Ministry of Agriculture, Malaysia.

Anon (1992). National Agricultural Policy 2. Ministry of Agriculture, Malaysia.
Anon (1998). National Agricultural Policy 3. Ministry of Agriculture, Malaysia.
Anon (1980/81). Economic Reports. Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
Anon (1990/91). Economic Reports. Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
Anon (1994/95). Economic Reports. Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
Anon (1999/2000). Economic Reports. Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
Anon (2002/03). Economic Reports. Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
Anon (2004/05). Economic Reports. Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
Anon (2007/08). Economic Reports. Ministry of Finance, Malaysia.
Anon (2007).Agricultural Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture & Agro-based Industry,
Malaysia.
Anon 2008. Malaysian Crop Care & Public Health Association (MCPA) Annual
Report.
Baki B. Bakar (2006a). Shaping the Future of Agriculture and Weed Science to
Serve Humanity. Inaugural Professorial Lecture, University of Malaya
2006.
Baki, B. Bakar (2006b). Shaping the Future of Weed Science to Serve Humanity.
University of Malaya Press, Kuala Lumpur, 183 p.

356