Comprehensive Evaluation of Knowledge and Perceptions Regarding Geriatric Dentistry Among Saudi Arabian Dental Students

Journal of Population Therapeutics
& Clinical Pharmacology
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
DOI: 10.15586/jptcp.2021.v28i1.837
Comprehensive evaluation of knowledge and perceptions regarding geriatric

dentistry among Saudi Arabian dental students
Sami Aldhuwayhi
Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Majmaah University, Almajmaah, Saudi Arabia
Corresponding author: Sami Aldhuwayhi, Head and Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics,
College of Dentistry, Majmaah University, Almajmaah, 11952 Saudi Arabia. Email: [email protected]
Submitted: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 10 April 2021; Published: 2 September 2021
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and perceptions of Arabian dental
students on geriatric dentistry.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a total of 100 participants belong-
ing to Group I (25 each from third- and fourth-year students) and Group II (50 fifth-year students and
interns ). All participants had completed a three-part questionnaire related to geriatric dentistry: Part I
(knowledge), Part II (cognitive evaluation), and Part III (awareness and attitude of psychosocial and health
problems). Comparisons were made between the groups, and the data were analyzed using SPSS software.
Results: The responses on the Part I were not statistically significant among the groups (P > 0.05). The
knowledge mean scores comparison showed an evident significant relationship among the groups (P <
0.05). Overall the Group II participants achieved the highest scores for all the Parts (all P > 0.05).
Conclusions: The students belong to Group II, and the interns achieved higher scores than the Group I
students. Dental students and interns in Saudi Arabia lack positive approaches in providing primary health
care to geriatric individuals despite a rapidly growing geriatric population.
Keywords: dental education; dental students; geriatric dentistry; geriatric education.
population reaching an advanced age. The develop-

INTRODUCTION
ment of new medications and treatments, advance-
Improvement in the general health status in a ments in medical knowledge, improved hygiene,
growing population has shown a significant geriatric better nutrition, and improved working conditions.1
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non
Commercial 4.0 International License. ©2021 Sami Aldhuwayhi
35
Comprehensive evaluation of knowledge and perceptions regarding geriatric dentistry
This change in health status is most clearly visi- MATERIALS AND METHODS
ble in developing countries where an increase in
This descriptive cross-sectional study design
the geriatric population and absolute numbers are
selected samples using a convenience sampling
noticed.1,2 It has been reported that the number of
technique among all the students attending the
people of age 60 years is expected to increase from
College of dentistry, Majmaah University, Saudi
600 million to 2 billion globally by 2050.3 In Saudi
Arabia. A total of 100 participants (Group I: 25
Arabia, the population over the age of 60 years
students each from the third- and fourth year and
has escalated recently.4 This demographic shift is
Group II: 50 fifth-year students and interns were
because of a rapid escalation in the aging of the pop-
involved in the study in the survey. This conve-
ulation. These individuals require necessary dental
nient sample involved entire students in the col-
and medical services at an age when they can least
lege. All participants students were asked to
endure and afford them. A widespread occurrence
complete a three-part questionnaire: Part I of the
of prejudice towards geriatric adults in society is
questionnaire included questions on basic knowl-
reported.5 Studies have also shown that commu-
edge of geriatric patients (16 questions), Part II was
nal stereotypes of geriatric people generally depict
based on cognitive evaluations of clinical condi-
being undesirable.5,6 This mindset is particularly
tions specific to geriatric patients (24 questions),
prevalent among young- and middle-aged persons.
and Part III (A and B) included awareness of psy-
Geiger7 reported that many forthcoming stu-
chosocial and health problems, their experience,
dent professionals exhibit misunderstandings and
and situational stresses that influence geriatric
misconceptions regarding the aged people and
adults oral health (Part IIIA and Part IIIB con-
aging processes. As a result, many graduates have
tained 15 and 8 questions, respectively). This ques-
minimal or no knowledge of basic facts regarding
tionnaire was sourced from Fabiano et al.12 with
geriatrics and indicate a slight preference towards
minimal modifications to test the clinical skills
working with the geriatric population.8 This lack of
and suit the Saudi Arabian context. The study was
knowledge can result in detrimental consequences
conducted in accordance with the World Medical
for delivering oral health care services to this popu-
Association Declaration of Helsinki and approved
lation.9 Previous studies have reported the need for
by the Ethics Committee of Majmaah University,
adequate levels of knowledge and efforts to meet the
Majmaah, Saudi Arabia. The present study used
needs of the geriatric population can be beneficial
a descriptive-analytical survey of the cross-sec-
for their health improvement.10 An American survey
tional design. The questionnaire was evaluated by
demonstrated that 20% of dental graduates indicated
two external evaluators who had more than fifteen
that they were ill-prepared to provide health care
years of experience. The questionnaire content was
services to geriatric patient’s comprehensively.11
approved as satisfactory, and it was determined
There are 24 dental schools (18 public and six pri-
that all questions were understandable. Part, I and
vate) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Nevertheless,
II of the questionnaire scores, were based on the
none of the studies to date have focused on dental
percentage of correct answers (correct, incorrect,
students’ opinions on the oral health care of geri-
and do not know). For Part IIIA, the scores were
atric populations in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, there
based on the influence of psychosocial factors on
is a need to develop a new curriculum for dental
the geriatric patient (minor influence, major influ-
students in Saudi Arabia to manage the geriatric
ence, and no influence), and Part IIIB reflected the
population with dental needs. This study aimed to
student’s perception of missing dental appoint-
evaluate the knowledge and perceptions of dental
ments (true, false, and do not know). The response
students on geriatric dentistry in Saudi Arabia.

36
scores were divided into three groups high (>60%), were compared using the student t-test between the
medium (30–60%), and low (<30%). Group I and two groups (Figure 1). The descriptive analysis of
Group II responses were compared to assess and knowledge means scores among the groups . Group
evaluate cognitive reasoning of clinical conditions II (8.42 ± 2.91) showed higher mean scores than
in old age, factors affecting psychosocial issues, Group I (6.52 ± 3.12), and a statistically significant
and situations influencing oral health in geriatric relationship was found among them (P < 0.05).
patients. The mean knowledge scores were com- The details of the knowledge mean scores and
pared using the student t-test. The chi-square test median values are summarized in Table 2. There
was used to compare the percentages of responses were no high levels of favorable responses in Part
for each question. The information obtained was II by Group I students. All the responses were
analyzed using IBM Corp. (SPSS Statistics for moderate- to-low in percentage, with an average
Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY, USA). of 30.8% correct responses. High levels of correct
responses in Group II included items questioning
issues such as difficulty in locating canals and the
RESULTS
inability to keep the mouth open for a long time
A 100% response rate was received in the pres- while performing a root canal treatment, presence of
ent cross-sectional study. A comparison of Group I atrophied ridges, preexisting systemic disease, bone
and Group II responses did not reveal statistically quality, irrigation protocols, and speed of bone-cut-
significant differences in the Part I questionnaire ting affecting dental implants (Table 3). The average
(chi-square = 4.3999; P > 0.05). The part II ques- percentage of correct answers for Group II students
tionnaire’s cognitive evaluation among Group I and answering Part II of the questionnaire was 55.5%.
II showed a statistically significant difference (chi- Part IIIA included questions about the perception of
square = 15.4042; P = .008), as shown in Figure 1. the psychosocial and health problems that geriatric
Overall scores for Groups I and II were obtained dental patients may experience (Table 4). Group I
from all the parts of the questionnaire. Part I of the students’ responses showed an overall percentage of
questionnaire reflected issues surrounding general only 36.8% regarding “major influences” for vari-
knowledge regarding aging. Items on height decline ous psychosocial factors affecting older adults’ oral
and chronic illness demonstrated high levels of health.
correct responses by Group I student’s responses In comparison, the Group II students responded
(Table 1). The remaining percentages of correct with a correct overall percentage of 56.4% regarding
responses were below 50%, and the average of identifying the same factors’ primary influences.
correct answers for Group I students was 39.8%. The Part IIIB questionnaire discussed the eight
Group II students provided a higher level of correct issues perceived by the dental graduates to prevent
answers in Part I for items like chronic illness, the geriatric people from honoring appointments, and
decline in height, life expectancy, old age activities items were ranked to select the problems (Table 5).
(Table 1). The remaining items showed moderate The top three barrier responses identified by the
correct response levels; none of the items on Part I of geriatric populations in Group I, included unim-
the questionnaire obtained a low percentage of right portant oral health care, transportation problems,
responses. On the other hand, 51.9% was an average and financial issues. Those in Group II students
correct response for Group II students. It indicated showed as failing to understand the importance
that Group II students demonstrated considerably of keeping appointments, not believing that dental
higher and broader relevant knowledge levels than care is a priority, and not caring about their oral
Group I students. The knowledge mean scores health.

37
Group I (%) Group II (%)
55.5 56.4
50.9
39.8
36.8
30.8
Part II Part III

Part I
(p < 0.05) (p > 0.05)
(p > 0.05)
FIGURE 1. Comparison of mean knowledge scores between the two groups.
DISCUSSION
of concerns. No statistically significant finding was
Dental students in Saudi Arabia engage in 6 obtained in this study. It was surprising that the stu-
years of dental curriculum content and training dents lacked a positive attitude towards the geriat-
designed to provide education and socialization in ric and exhibited relatively low general knowledge
the profession. The educational experience has an regarding this population’s wellbeing. These find-
inherent potential for influencing the existing atti- ings were in agreement with a South Indian study.15
tudes that the students have toward the growing num- The results of Part II of the questionnaire indicated
bers of geriatric patients. This study was designed that students’ accurate level of understanding of the
to explore undergraduate dental students’ general geriatric patients’ cognitive evaluations was 30% for
attitudes to geriatric people in three dimensions: Group I and 55% for Group II students, respectively.
(1) basic knowledge of aging; (2) cognitive evalua- This difference was statistically significant among
tion of clinical conditions and psychosocial factors both the student groups. The low levels of accurate
influencing oral health; and (3) dental students’ per- responses in terms of cognitive evaluation in Group I
ceptions of the reasons why geriatric patients do students can be attributed to the fact that there is no
not keep appointments. The questionnaire was used theoretical and clinical knowledge on geriatric den-
to evaluate the geriatric oral health knowledge in tistry in the third and fourth years of the dental edu-
health-related professions13,14 and modified for the cation programs. The moderate levels of cognitive
Saudi Arabian context. Part I questionnaire’s find- knowledge in Group II students can be attributed to
ings showed low correct response rates for Group I a theoretical course on geriatrics for the fifth-year
and II students and interns regarding essential issues dental students. The authors believe that the present
such as general knowledge regarding aging, health study is the first to perform cognitive knowledge of
status, and age-associated illnesses being a cause geriatric dental problems in dental students.

38
TABLE 1. Comparison of Knowledge Scores among the Geriatric Population.

No. Questionnaire (Part I) Group I Group II P value
1 A person’s height tends to decline in old age. 68% 70% 0.75
2 Adults older than 65 years tend to have chronic illnesses that limit their 68% 84% 0.17
activity compared with younger persons.
3 Geriatric persons have more acute symptoms than persons younger 36% 38% 0.27
than 65 years
4 Geriatric persons have more injuries at home than persons below 65 46% 56% 0.59
years
5 Geriatric workers have less absenteeism than younger workers. 38% 48% 0.54
6 The life expectancy of men at the age of 65 is about the same as 48% 64% 0.25
women.
7 Medical insurance cover, oral health care, rehabilitation, and expenses 26% 48% 0.03*
for a person older than 65 years of age.
8 The aged have higher rates of criminal victimization than those below 42% 46% 0.25
65 years.
9 The aged are more fearful of crime than the people younger than 65 44% 48% 0.06
years.
10 The aged are more law-abiding of all adult groups. 38% 56% 0.00*
11 Decision making ability decline after the age of 65 years. 34% 32% 0.17
12 Participation in voluntary organizations (religious institutions and 28% 44% 0.12
social activities) tends to increase with age.
13 The majority of aged live alone. 40% 42% 0.34
14 The rate of poverty among aged in Saudi is higher than younger group. 34% 50% 0.03*
15 Geriatric persons who reduce their activities tend to be happier than 36% 62% 0.00*
those who remain active.
16 When the last child leaves home, majority of the parents have serious 30% 54% 0.05
problems adjusting with their ‘empty ness.’
Group I, third-and fourth-year students; Group II, fifth-year students and interns.
TABLE 2. Comparison of Knowledge Mean Scores Achieved by Both Groups.

Group N Mean Median SD Mean difference 95% Confidence Interval P value
Lower Upper
Group I 50 6.52 6.0 3.12 −1.86 −3.06 −0.662 0.003*
Group II 50 8.42 9.0 2.91
N, number of subjects; Group I, third-and fourth-year students; Group II, fifth-year students and interns.
* Significant.

39
TABLE 3. Comparison of Cognitive Scores among the Groups.

No. Questionnaire (Part II) Group I Group II P value
1 Is the presence of a small pulp chambers the prime difficulty a dentist 56% 76% 0.06
encounters while performing root canal treatment in geriatric patients?
2 Are difficulties in locating canals the major problem a dentist 44% 84% 0.00*
encounters while performing the root canal treatment in geriatric
patients?
3 Is the existence of narrow root canals a significant difficulty 30% 56% 0.00*
encountered by the dentist while performing root canal treatment in
geriatric patients
4 Are more chances of having pulp stones the crucial difficulty 38% 58% 0.00*
encountered by the dentist while performing root canal treatment in
geriatric patients?
5 Is the inability to keep the mouth open for a long time the pivotal 38% 64% 0.00*
difficulty a dentist encounters while performing root canal treatment in
geriatric patients?
6 Can the presence of atrophied residual ridges affect the placement of 44% 78% 0.00*
dental implants in geriatric patients.?
7 Can the presence of decreased bone quality affect the placement of 46% 74% 0.00*
dental implants in geriatric patients?
8 Can the presence of pre-existing systemic disease affect the placement 32% 78% 0.00*
of dental implants in geriatric patients?
9 Can the presence of neuromuscular canals close to the crest of the ridge 20% 52% 0.00*
affect the placement of dental implants in geriatric patients?
10 Can the presence of maxillary sinus close to the ridge affect the 24% 56% 0.00*
placement of dental implants in geriatric patients?
11 Can the speed of bone-cutting be considered an intraoperative factor 32% 60% 0.00*
affecting the outcome of dental implants in geriatric patients?
12 Is torque of bone-cutting considered an intraoperative factor that can 22% 44% 0.00*
affect the outcome of dental implants in geriatric patients?
13 Is irrigation protocol considered an intraoperative factor that can affect 24% 62% 0.00*
the outcome of dental implants in geriatric patients?
14 Is progressive loading considered an intraoperative factor that can 16% 56% 0.00*
affect the outcome of dental implants in geriatric patients?
15 Can immediate loading be a better option than progressive in the 22% 36%
elderly, considered an intraoperative factor that can affect the outcome
of dental implants in geriatric patients?
16 Is recording jaw relation for complete denture construction difficult in a 24% 58% 0.00*
geriatric patient with a neuromuscular disorder?
17 Is impression making for complete denture construction difficult in a 26% 44% 0.00*
geriatric patient with neuromuscular disease?
18 Is border molding for complete denture construction difficult in 26% 34% 0.04*
geriatric patients with neuromuscular disorder?
(continues)

40
TABLE 3. Continued

No. Questionnaire (Part II) Group I Group II P value
19 Is teeth arrangement procedure for complete denture construction 28% 38% 0.00*
difficult in a geriatric patient with a neuromuscular disorder?
20 Is denture insertion procedure for complete denture construction 40% 62% 0.04*
difficult in a geriatric patient with a neuromuscular disorder?
21 A geriatric patient is considered for RPD with periodontally healthy 16% 34% 0.00*
11, 21 and canines 13, 23 in the maxillary arch. Is extraction of the
remaining central incisors and going for overdentures on canines will
be the ideal treatment plan for this case?
22 A geriatric patient is considered for RPD with periodontally healthy 11, 32% 38% 0.00*
21 and canines 13, 23 in the maxillary arch. Is fixed bridge for laterals
and RPD for missing posteriors the ideal treatment plan for this case?
23 A geriatric patient is considered for RPD with periodontally healthy 11, 26% 44% 0.01*
21 and canines 13, 23 in the maxillary arch. Is cast partial RPD for all
missing teeth will be the ideal treatment plan for this case?
24 A geriatric patient is considered for RPD with periodontally healthy 34% 46% 0.05
11, 21 and canines 13, 23 in the maxillary arch. Is precision attachment
retained RPD the ideal treatment plan for this case?
Broder and Block16 found significant improve- scores were evident; while the Group I students
ments in the pre- to post test scores conducted for achieved low scores, the Group II students achieved
dental students immediately following a geriatric high scores. The findings were statistically signifi-
course. But a significant decline was seen about a cant. There is minimal exposure of geriatric patients
year after the course’s completion. The present study and knowledge on geriatric oral health to higher
also revealed marked improvement in knowledge class students. Overall, a need to improve the clin-
after introducing a geriatric course for Group II ical and theoretical knowledge on the management
students, but this knowledge was below <60% and of oral health issues in the geriatric population was
could not be considered satisfactory. It is important evident in the study. Nochajski et al.18 opined that
to note that undergraduate dental students are under future studies should target attitudinal aspects of
immense pressure to maximize patient contact and dental education regarding the geriatric population
meet the educational goals and clinical require- and address methods to improve the educational
ments necessary for graduation.17 This component processes to enhance positive attitudes and prob-
is particularly relevant during the third to the fifth lem-solving bio-psychosocial issues. Furthermore,
year of the dental curriculum. As a result, these den- Wen and et al.19 opined that their study’s qualitative
tal students may develop a negative attitude towards comments confirmed the positive impact of learn-
patients with psychosocial issues, which prevents ing interprofessional core competencies on geriatric
them from scheduling appointments and undergo- health problems.
ing planned treatments. The question which must Our results were consistent with other published
be raised is: “Is our dental education process itself research, which found that educational courses can
a major factor in our students’ development of neg- improve knowledge but have little impact on gen-
ative bias towards the geriatric population?”12 Even eral attitudes toward geriatric dental care.20–22 It has
in the present study, practical knowledge mean been reported that integrating geriatric education

41
TABLE 4. Comparison of Scores for Factors Influencing Oral Health in the Geriatric Population
among the Groups.
No. Questionnaire (Part IIIA) Group I Group II P value
1 How much influence does social isolation have on the oral health of a 38% 56% 0.19
geriatric population?
2 How much influence does change in eating habits have on the oral 38% 76%
health of the geriatric population?
3 How much influence does the ability to walk independently have on the 32% 44% 0.41
oral health of the geriatric population?
4 How much influence does being independent at home have on the oral 36% 52% 0.26
5 How much influence does a serious or life-threatening illness have on 32% 64% 0.01*
the oral health of the geriatric population?
6 How much influence does being in an abusive relationship have on the 42% 56% 0.21
7 How much influence do systemic disease and medication have on the 44% 70% 0.02*
8 How much influence do psychological factors influencing prosthodontics 38% 58% 0.10
treatment have on the oral health of the geriatric population?
9 How much influence do patients’ impaired cognitive abilities have on 38% 52% 0.370318
10 How much influence does increased forgetfulness have on the oral 42% 56% 0.14
11 How much influence does increased confusion have on the oral health 38% 38%
of the geriatric population?
12 How much influence does uncooperative behavior have on the oral 26% 56% 0.00*
13 How much influence does noncompliance with instructions have on the 40% 48% 0.64
14 How much influence do legal problems such as guardianship have on 28% 50% 0.04*
15 How much influence does mental illness have on the oral health of the 40% 70% 0.00*
geriatric population?
*Significant.
throughout the dental studies curriculum, rather in dental clinics, under supervision, with a multi-
than focusing on specific courses, has increased pos- disciplinary approach. Fedele and et al.25 postulated
itive attitudes towards the geriatric population.23,24 that the dentist who deals with geriatric dentistry
Increased emphasis for inclusion of should be made should be a member of the interdisciplinary team.
geriatric dentistry in the preclinical, paraclinical, Such multi/interdisciplinary teamwork could impact
and clinical subjects at the undergraduate level since the student’s knowledge and attitudes about geriat-
previously has been reportedly successful.24 Students ric oral health problems. Moreover, Bonwell et al.26
should be encouraged to treat geriatric populations findings opined half a day with seminars or live

42
TABLE 5. Dental students’ perceptions on the reasons for geriatric patients failing the appointments.
No. Questionnaire (Part IIIB) Group I Group II P value
1 Transportation problem 48% 50% 0.61
2 Financial problem 40% 46% 0.69
3 Family problem 36% 34% 0.66
4 They do not understand how important keeping appointments are 28% 16% 0.05
5 They do not care about their oral health 58% 56% 0.13
6 Teeth are not at the top of the priority list 34% 60% 0.03*
7 Other problems become overwhelming, and self-care esteem seems 32% 34% 0.97
unimportant
8 Abuse or neglect by family members or caregivers 30% 34% 0.81
*Significant.
webinars on geriatric oral health issues. The pro- patients was not assessed. Third, all the students
gressive geriatric workforce should support geriatric attending the third to the fifth-year and interns were
patients by utilizing an interprofessional educational included in the study; hence, gender-based analysis
approach. On the other hand, it has been suggested was not carried out. Lastly, the study findings are
that a 2-hour education program for students would related to only one college in the kingdom of Saudi
help to get the awareness of oral health difficulties Arabia. So, the results from the study are impossible
in the geriatric population.25 Kiyak et al.27 performed to generalize, and these findings can only be used as
a self-assessment of competence in geriatric den- a reference point for further studies.
tistry and concluded that clinical teaching might
be an opportunity to practice skills and reinforce
CONCLUSIONS
knowledge. This approach has been implemented in
didactic courses in geriatrics. However, it is essen- Overall, significantly lower scores were
tial to design and develop a curriculum as a dental achieved by all the students who participated in
education program component. There is a need to the study. The students belong to the fifth year, and
explore knowledge and perceptions on geriatric den- interns achieved higher scores than the third- and
tistry among dental students with large sample size. fourth years. Dental graduates in Saudi Arabia
Furthermore, a multinational study could explain the lack positive approaches in providing primary
requirement and use of geriatric dentistry in under- health care to a rapidly growing geriatric popula-
graduate education in Saudi Arabia. tion. Therefore, there is an increased need to focus
on a geriatric component introduction in the dental
curriculum for undergraduates in Saudi Arabia is
LIMITATIONS
strongly recommended.
The present study has some limitations.
First, it included only 100 students belonging to a
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Government University, which could be a latent
limitation of the study. Second, the lack of assess- The author would like to thank the Deanship
ment of the student’s ability to develop a good inter- of Scientific Research, Majmaah University, Saudi
personal relationship with general and geriatric Arabia for supporting this project.

43
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 11. Weaver RG, Haden NK, Valachovic RW. Annual
ADEA survey of dental school seniors: 2002 grad-
No potential conflict of interests was reported uating class. J Dent Educ. 2002;66:1388–404.
by the author. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2002.66.12.
tb03613.x
12. Fabiano JA, Waldrop DP, Nochajski TH, Davis
REFERENCES
EL, Goldberg LJ. Understanding dental stu-
1. Treas J, Logue B. Economic development and the dents’ knowledge and perceptions of older peo-
older population. Popul Dev Rev 1986;12:645–73. ple: Toward a new model of geriatric dental
https://doi.org/10.2307/1973430 education. J Dent Educ. 2005;69:419–33. https://
2. Grigsby JS. Paths for future population aging. doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.4.tb03929.x
Gerontologist. 1991;31:195–203. https://doi.org/10. 13. Hawk C, Byrd L, Killinger LZ. Evaluation
1093/geront/31.2.195 of a geriatrics course emphasizing interdis-
3. World Health Organization. The world report on ciplinary issues for chiropractic students.
ageing and health. World Health Organization. J Gerontol Nurs. 2001;27:6–12. https://doi.
Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/ org/10.3928/0098-9134-20010701-07
10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf?ua=1. 14. Kaempfer D, Wellman NS, Himburg SP. Dietetics
4. Al-Shehri S. Oral health status of older people in res- students’ low knowledge, attitudes, and work
idential homes in Saudi Arabia. OJST. 2012;2:307– preferences toward older adults indicate need
13. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2012.24053 for improved education about aging. J Am Diet
5. Gape RD, Hensichkle PJ. Perspective of health and Assoc. 2002;102:197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/
old age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980;28:295–9. https:// S0002-8223(02)90048-9
doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1980.tb00618.x 15. Anehosur GV, Nadiger RK. Evaluation of under-
6. Solomon K, Vicker R. Attitudes of health pro- standing level of Indian dental students’ knowl-
fessionals towards old people. J Am Geriatr Soc. edge and perception regarding older adults.
1979;28:186–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415. Gerodontology. 2012;201229:e1215–21. https://doi.
1979.tb06445.x org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00416.x
7. Geiger D. How future professionals view the elderly – a 16. Broder H, Block MJ. Effects of geriatric edu-
comparative analysis of social work, law and medical cation on the knowledge of dental students.
student perceptions. Gerontologist. 1978;18:591–4. Spec Care Dentist . 1986;6:177–9. https://doi.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/18.6.591 org/10.1111/j.1754-4505.1986.tb00990.x
8. Mersel A, Mann J, Malre D, Anaise J. Israeli 17. Friedlander LT, Meldrum AM, Lyons K.
dental students attitudes toward elderly patients. Curriculum development in final year dentistry to
Spec Care Dentist. 1984;4:261–3. https://doi. enhance competency and professionalism for con-
org/10.1111/j.1754-4505.1984.tb00206.x temporary general dental practice. EurJ Dent Educ.
9. Wood GJ, Mulligan R. Cross sectional com- 2019;23(4):498–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12458
parison of dental students’ knowledge and atti- 18. Nochajski TH, Waldrop DP, Davis EL, Fabiano
tudes before geriatric training: 1984-1999. J Dent JA, Goldberg LJ. Factors that influence den-
Educ. 2000;64:763–71. https://doi.org/10.100 tal students’ attitudes about older adults. J Dent
2/j.0022-0337.2000.64.11.tb03380.x Educ. 2009;73:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/
10. Plonczynski Dj, Ehrlich-Jones L, Robertson j.0022-0337.2009.73.1.tb04642.x
JF. Ensuring a knowledgeable and committed 19. Wen A, Wong L, Ma C, Arndt R, Katz AR,
gerontological nursing workforce. Nurse Educ Richardson K, Deutsch M, Masaki K. An inter-
Today. 2007;27:113–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. professional team simulation exercise about a
nedt.2006.04.004 complex geriatric patient. Gerontol Geriatr Educ.

44
2019;40:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2 24. Shah N (2005). Need for gerodontology education

018.1554568 in India. Gerodontology. 2005;22:104–5. https://
20. Scheffler SJ. Do clinical experiences affect nurs- doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2005.00062.x
ing students’ attitudes towards older adults. J Nurs 25. Fedele DJ, Basehore PM, Cavalieri TA,
Educ. 1995;34:312–26. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148- Pomerantz S. Evaluation of a two-hour oral health
4834-19951001-06 education program for medical students. Gerontol
21. Moriello GR, Smey JW, Pescatello LS, Geriatr Educ. 1996;16(3):85–9. https://doi.org/10.10
Murphy MA. Influence of an educational interven- 80/02701960.1996.10697055
tion on preallied health students’ attitudes toward 26. Bonwell PB, Parsons PL, Best AM, Hise S. An
older adults. Gerontol Geriatr Educ.2005;25:1–11. interprofessional educational approach to oral
https://doi.org/10.1300/J021v25n03_01 health care in the geriatric population. Gerontol
22. Baum EE, Nelson KM. The effect of a 12-month Geriatr Educ. 2014; 35(2):182–99. https://doi.org/1
longitudinal long-term care rotation on knowledge 0.1080/02701960.2013.827572
and attitudes of internal medicine residents about 27. Kiyak HA, Brudvik J. Dental students’ self-as-
geriatrics. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005;8:105–9. sessed competence in geriatric dentistry. J Dent
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2006.05.009 Educ. 1992;56(11):728–34. https://doi.org/10.100
23. Lovell M. Caring for the elderly: Changing percep- 2/j.0022-0337.1992.56.11.tb02696.x
tions and attitudes. J Vascu Nurs. 2006;24:22–6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvn.2005.11.001

45

Comprehensive Evaluation of Knowledge and Perceptions Regarding Geriatric Dentistry Among Saudi Arabian Dental Students

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Comprehensive Evaluation of Knowledge and Perceptions Regarding Geriatric Dentistry Among Saudi Arabian Dental Students

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Comprehensive Evaluation of Knowledge and Perceptions Regarding Geriatric Dentistry Among Saudi Arabian Dental Students

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Journal of Population Therapeutics

& Clinical Pharmacology

Comprehensive evaluation of knowledge and perceptions regarding geriatric

Submitted: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 10 April 2021; Published: 2 September 2021

population reaching an advanced age. The develop-

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

Group I (%) Group II (%)

Part II Part III

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

TABLE 1. Comparison of Knowledge Scores among the Geriatric Population.

TABLE 2. Comparison of Knowledge Mean Scores Achieved by Both Groups.

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

TABLE 3. Comparison of Cognitive Scores among the Groups.

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

TABLE 3. Continued

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

2019;40:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2 24. Shah N (2005). Need for gerodontology education

J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol Vol 28:35–45; 2 September 2021

You might also like