IMPACT OF RTI ACT ON CORRUPTION

SUMMER INTERNSHIP - 2019

SUBMITTED BY:
BHARAT AGRAWAL
B.A.LL.B (Hons.), 2nd Semester
NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, NAGPUR

SUBMITTED TO:

SHRI PIYUSH AGARWAL

HON’BLE REGISTRAR

1|P a ge
TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 3

INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4

THE ADVENT OF RIGHT TO INFORMATION ................................................................. 7

RTI AS A TOOL TO TACKLE CORRUPTION ................................................................... 9

RTI SUCCESS STORIES ................................................................................................... 11

SHORTCOMINGS OF RTI ACT ....................................................................................... 12

UTILIZING RTI EFFECTIVELY TO COMBAT CORRUPTION- SUGGESTIONS ......... 15

CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 17

2|P a ge
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The author owes deep gratitude to Hon’ble Registrar, Shri Piyush Agarwal, who with his
guidance and support, allowed me to witness the practical application of the RTI Act, 2005
through hearings and enhanced discussions. The author is also extremely grateful to Legal
Consultants and Staff who furthered my understanding of RTI Act and clarified every
important facet of the Act and the procedure hereunder. Each of them not only provided a
thoughtful and insightful working of the commission but also the right ambience to work and
learn. The time spent at CIC as an intern provided a wealth of experience and learning, which
the author feels privileged to have and shall be indebted to all who have helped during the
internship.

3|P a ge
 INTRODUCTION

“Corruption is a tree, whose branches are of an immeasurable length; they spread

everywhere.” – Beaumont and Fletcher.

Corruption is a universal phenomenon faced by people in one or the other forms. In India, it
has become a part of life. It is the greatest foe of good-governance and causing great harm to
society and the nation. The word corruption is derived from the Latin word “corruptus,”
which means “corrupted” and, in legal terms, the abuse of a trusted position in one of the
branches of power (executive, legislative and judicial) or in political or other organizations
with the intention of obtaining material benefit which is not legally justified for itself or for
others.1Corruption was already mentioned as a great sin in the Holy Book Bible: “Do not
accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds those who see and twist the words of the innocent. 2

In our country governance depends on three basic pillars of the constitution namely the
Legislative which makes the laws, Judiciary which interprets the laws and the Executive
which include both the political as well as bureaucracy to implement the laws. Corruption is
the use of Public office for private gains. Public servants, who include both the political
executive and bureaucracy, are in a special position to practice corruption because of the
public office they occupy. India inherited its legacy of corruption from its ancient ruler, who
always expected some gifts in the form Nazarana from their subjects. There is hardly any area
of activity that has remained wholly free from the impact of corruption. In fact, corruption
has now been institutionalized has become a commonly accepted way of life. Eg. – High
donations for admission in schools and colleges, selling state secrets, pay-offs, bribes, under
the table transaction.3

Corruption is not accident by product of the system because of the venality of a few but a
defining element on which the edifice rests.”It is not likely to be fully eliminated, but the
objective is to minimize it so that it becomes an exception and not the rule. Since 1968 many
attempts were made in parliament to pass anti-corruption act in India but it failed to include
the civil society representatives and there after its implementation and enforcement will

1
Stephen Sumah, Corruption, Causes and Consequences, INTECHOPEN.COM (June-06-2019, 02:00PM)
https://www.intechopen.com/books/trade-and-global-market/corruption-causes-and-consequences.
2
https://www.biblehub.com/exodus/23-8.htm, (June-06-2019, 2:30PM).
3
K Madhavi, Right To Information Act: A Tool To Tackle Corruption “Cancer Of Corruption And The
Numbering Millennium”, IOSR-JHSS, Feb. 2016, at 13.

4|P a ge
present further challenges in a country as vast and diverse as India. RTI act is fast emerging
as an effective anti-corruption tool. RTI laws as they are commonly called grant citizens legal
rights to access information held by their governments, bringing much needed transparency
or opaque functioning of government.4

KEY FACTORS ENCOURAGING AND PROMOTING CORRUPTION

1. Lack of Transparency: Secrecy and confidentiality is the aspect which is used in

Public offices. It has become a tradition to keep the files confidential. This is the main
reason for corruption which is lack of transparency as files are not publicised and
people are kept in dark, which leads to rising scams in the country.
2. Lack of Accountability: Public officials are able to get away with bribes is that there
is no law, rule or convention, compelling or encouraging public officials to lay open
their income and assets to the people. It is generally found that a very large number of
officials and ministers have unaccounted assets and incomes disproportionate to their
legal sources of income. Many officials and politicians do not file their income-tax
returns, nor are they held accountable, and this helps to get away. If this information
is available to the public, there will be a number of people, who would exposed by
their possession of the illegal assets and income. It would be a very salutary effect on
curbing the menace of corruption in public life.
3. Lack of Institutional Machinery: With the Introduction of a system of Lokpal being
implemented at the Centre level. Victims believe that there is someone to listen to
their grievances. But at the same time there is lack of institution where the complaints
could be lodged about the corrupt and unethical acts of public officials. Even if the
complaints are lodged, there is no one to act upon it as the cases are transferred to
Anti Corruption Bureau, which consists of state police officers and also considered as
the most corrupt office. Subsequently, this means that there is no institution to hear
the complaints of aggrieved people. So, there is a need for an institution which should
be independent of the control of public officials and ministers, so it can work
effectively.
4. Lack of Information: Files are kept confidential in the public offices and the people
are not aware of the deals that is done between Government and Private entities , and
as it is their right to know about the deals which is for their benefit. So deals and their

4
Ibid.

5|P a ge
 terms should be made public which will lead to transparency. Hence, this could be a
way to curb corrupt practices.

KINDS OF CORRUPTION

Anti-corruption campaigners generally fit the multiplicity of types and forms of corruption
into a couple of descriptive boxes– grand corruption, petty or everyday corruption, political
corruption, depending on the amounts of money lost and the sector where it occurs.

 Grand corruption - consists of acts committed at a high level of government that

distort policies or the central functioning of the state, enabling leaders to benefit at the
expense of the public good.

 Petty corruption - refers to everyday abuse of entrusted power by low- and mid-level
public officials in their interactions with ordinary citizens, who often are trying to
access basic goods or services in places like hospitals, schools, police departments
and other agencies.
 Political corruption- is a manipulation of policies, institutions and rules of procedure
in the allocation of resources and financing by political decision makers, who abuse
their position to sustain their power, status and wealth. 5

All the above forms of corruption relate to the misuse of public office for private gain. These
forms do not refer to an important dimension of corruption, the abuse of private office for
private gain and here too the public sector is implicated in the sense that it has been lax in the
regulations that were supposed to restrain the activities of private sectors.6

5
https://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption#define, (June- 09-2019, 12:30PM).
6
Gopika Nambiar, Right To Information As An Anti-Corruption Tool, NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies,
January 2018, at 76.

6|P a ge
 THE ADVENT OF RIGHT TO INFORMATION

An act formulated by the Parliament of India to provide for setting out the practical regime of
right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public
authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every
public authority.7 This act replaces the erstwhile Freedom of Information Act, 2002. Under
the provisions of the act a citizen may seek information from any public authority, and the
public authority has to reply within 30days.

International Right to Know Day which is being celebrated all over the world on 28th
September. This day highlights the critical importance of people’s right to access information
held by their respective governments. In India a nationwide campaign led by the organisation
called Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangthan had played a vital role in the passage of the RTI Act.
Main thrust of RTI law to change the culture of secrecy, red tapism and aloofness that has
plagued India‘s monolithic and opaque bureaucracy. The efforts made by MKSS (Mazdoor
Kisan Shakti Sangthan) to tackle corruption at grass root level. The RTI Act is vast emerging
as an effective anti-corruption tool. RTI laws or ―sunshine laws as they are commonly
called, grant citizens legal rights to access information held by their governments, bringing
much needed transparency or opaque functioning of governments. 8

The government enacted the landmark Right to Information Act on 15 th June 2005 and got
assented to from 12 th October, 2005. The right of access to information is an important
human right, necessary for the enjoyment of other human rights. From then onwards, Citizens
of the country have been effectively using the Act to tackle corruption and also to make a
transparent and accountable government. Every day approx 4,800 applications are filed to
access information from the government across India. The first decadal study conducted after
Right to Information (RTI) Act implemented in October 2005 has revealed that over 1.75
crore applications have been filed with one-fourth being requests to the Centre. 9

7
https://rti.gov.in/webactrti.htm, (June-10-2019, 2:30PM).
8
K Madhavi, Right To Information Act: A Tool To Tackle Corruption “Cancer Of Corruption And The
Numbering Millennium”, IOSR-JHSS, Feb. 2016, at 13.
9
Nidhi Sharma, 1.75 crore RTI applications filed since 2005: Study, ECONOMIC TIMES
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/1-75-crore-rti-applications-filed-since-2005-
study/articleshow/54705694.cms (June-10-2019, 3:00PM).

7|P a ge
A study conducted by Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), exclusively accessed
by Economic Times, reveals that 27.2% (47.66 lakh) of the total RTIs filed between 2005 and
2015 were to the different ministries and departments under the Centre.10 Aruna Roy, a
social activist and founder of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangthan was the main architect
behind the RTI Act 2005 regarded, India‘s RTI Act as the most fundamental law this country
has ever seen as it can be used to access information from the local panchayat to parliament
from a small village to Delhi, from a ration shop to the 2G Scam”. Clearly, the Act has laid
emphasis on good governance, of which the major elements that have been identified are:
informed citizenry for encouraging people’s participation in development process,
transparency, accountability and reduction in corruption. Thus, the major objectives of the
Act are:

1. Greater Transparency in functioning of public authorities;

2. Informed citizenry for promotion of partnership between citizens and the Government
in decision making process;
3. Improvement in accountability and performance of the Government;
4. Reduction in corruption in the Government departments.

All these parameters are critical elements of good governance, which entails full
accountability to stakeholders, who are partners in development process. And, have the
powers to enforce accepted policies, common norms and recognized bench marks. It is
expected, therefore, that the citizens, armed with information obtained through their exercise
of right to know, would be able to protect life and liberty as well as secure equity and justice
before the law. An attempt is therefore made below to examine the extent to which the RTI
has been successful in influencing the above factors in the desirable direction.11

Access to information appears to empower the poor to the point where they receive almost
the same treatment as middle-class –individuals at the hands of civil servant. This is that
payment of a bribe can‘t do. It is a potent weapon to fight against corruption arbitrariness and
misuse of power. It is a vital tool for good governance and this law has been used to tackle a
high profile of corruption. RTI spilt all over the parts of the country and reduced the
corruption.

10
Ibid.
11
M.M Ansari, Right to Information and its Relationship to Good Governance and Development,
SEMANTICSCHOLAR.ORG, (June-11-2019, 11:30AM)
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1a50/bf12f0bf13c121419599c9092308757e926d.pdf.

8|P a ge
 RTI AS A TOOL TO TACKLE CORRUPTION

The political mobilization against corruption started with the RTI. The culture of secrecy, as
known, encourages the government officials to indulge in corrupt practices, which result in
lower investments due to misuse of power and diversion of funds for private purposes. As a
result, the government’s social spending yields no worthwhile benefits, because, for instance,
the teachers do not teach, doctors and nurses do not attend health centres, ration card holders
do not receive subsidized food grains and, thus, livelihood support is denied, and the
promised jobs are not provided to the poor, who are assured of income support. In the
process, it perpetuates poverty and harms the poor. It creates an environment of distrust
between the people and the government, which impinge upon the development and
jeopardize democratic governance. The legislation on RTI can act like an antidote to vested
interests which try to conceal or misinterpret information or which try to manipulate the
media directly or indirectly to plant misinformation. 12
The Right to Information Act 2005 has provided us the right to get information from the
government. Through this we can now expose corruption and also bring to light those duties
that are not being performed by the officials. Also, in some countries RTI has been seen as
part of the anti-corruption or state modernization agendas (for instance Mexico and Chile), in
South Asia, particularly in India. Through all this we can also seek solutions to our problems.
We can ask information about projects and plans. We can inspect files and check for any
misappropriations. The government spends a huge amount of money for development work.
We can ask for information about the work being done in our area. Information relating to
tenders, agreements, payments and estimates of engineering work etc can be obtained with
the help of the Right to information Act. Besides these, information can be sought on the
following-13
(1) You can demand samples of materials used for the construction of roads, drains and
buildings etc.
(2)You can demand an inspection of any social development work, work in progress or
information related to any completed work.
(3)You can demand an inspection of government documents, maps for the construction,
registers and records.

12
Aprajita Bhargava, RTI –A Tool To Fight Against Corruption, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL
DEVELOPMENTS AND ALLIED ISSUES, January 2018, at 7.
13
Ibid.

9|P a ge
(4)You can demand information related to the progress made on any complaint filed by you
in the recent past.
Experiences suggest that in the states where the Right to Information Act has been
implemented, it has become an important tool of social development and governance.
Tackling pendency at the Information Commission and stringent punishment to guilty
officials as well as massive awareness campaigns among the masses for proper use of RTI
constitutes the key to the success of RTI regime.
Under the RTI regime, there is unprecedented transparency in the working of public
departments. There is thus better understanding of the decision making process and greater
accountability of government. This has led to reduction in corruption in the country as
evident from the following:

i) The Transparency International (TI) had reported that perceived corruption in India has
declined, due mainly to the implementation of the RTI Act. This is evident from corruption
reduction score of 3.4 (out of 10) in 2008, after an initial rise of 3.5 in 2007, compared to
2.99 in 2006, which indicate a decline in corruption to the extent of 15%.14 India has
marginally improved its ranking in the graft watchdog Transparency International's
corruption perception index for 2016 got a score of 40 out of 100
and has improved by two points as in 2015 the country had scored 38.15

ii) The TI-CMS has recently accomplished an all India survey study of the poor below the
poverty line. The views of the poor have been elicited in respect of all the flagship
programmes that have been implemented for alleviation of poverty. At least 40 per cent of the
respondents have reported that corruption has declined.

iii) It has also been observed that wherever NGOs are actively involved in the development
activities, the perceived corruption is abysmally low. 16

14
M.M Ansari, Right to Information and its Relationship to Good Governance and Development,
SEMANTICSCHOLAR.ORG, (June-12-2019, 3:30PM)
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1a50/bf12f0bf13c121419599c9092308757e926d.pdf.
15
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/india-improves-on-transparency-corruption-index-1652768,(June-12-
2019,3:40PM).
16
M.M Ansari, Right to Information and its Relationship to Good Governance and Development,
SEMANTICSCHOLAR.ORG, (June-12-2019, 3:50PM)
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1a50/bf12f0bf13c121419599c9092308757e926d.pdf.

10 | P a g e
 RTI SUCCESS STORIES

1. Adarsh Society Scam: The applications filed by RTI activists like Yogacharya
Anandji and Simpreet Singh in 2008 were instrumental in bringing to light links
between politicians and military officials, among others. The 31-storey building,
which had permission for six floors only, was originally meant to house war widows
and veterans. Instead, the flats went to several politicians, bureaucrats and their
relatives. The scandal has already led to the resignation of Ashok Chavan, the former
chief minister of Maharashtra. Other state officials are also under the scanner.
2. Public Distribution Scam in Assam: In 2007, members of an anti-corruption non-
governmental organization based in Assam, the Krishak Mukti Sangram Samiti, filed
an RTI request that revealed irregularities in the distribution of food meant for people
below the poverty line. The allegations of corruption were probed and several
government officials arrested.
3. Appropriation of Relief Funds: Information obtained through an RTI application by
an NGO based in Punjab, in 2008 revealed that bureaucrats heading local branches of
the Indian Red Cross Society used money intended for victims of the Kargil war and
natural disasters to buy cars, air-conditioners and pay for hotel bills – among other
things. Local courts charged the officials found responsible with fraud and the funds
were transferred to the Prime Minister's Relief Fund.
4. IIM’s Admission Criteria: Vaishnavi Kasturi a visually-impaired student, in 2007
was denied a seat in the Indian Institute of Management in Bangalore, one of the
country's premier management institutes - despite her impressive score at the entrance
examination. Ms. Kasturi wanted to know why, and wondered whether it was because
of her physical disability. She filed an RTI application to request the institute to
disclose their selection process. Although she failed to gain admission to the institute,
her RTI application meant that IIM had to make its admission criteria public 17.

17
Vibhuti Agarwal, A look at some RTI Success Stories, WALL STREET JOURNAL (June-14-2019)
<https://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/10/14/a-look-at-some-rti-success-stories/>.

11 | P a g e
 SHORTCOMINGS OF RTI ACT

Though the RTI Act has played a pivotal role in exposing corruption in various arenas,
yet, the statistics presented above are indicative that the cancerous growth of corruption
has not been brought to a standstill; scams cripple the economy and development of the
country continue to plague the three branches of the state. The following are, seemingly,
some of the shortcomings of the RTI Act.

1. Overlooking the Concept of Grand Corruption: The understanding of the concept

of corruption that most of the common people have is limited in the sense that they
tend to narrow it down to misappropriation of finances and public funds. They tend to
overlook the concept of „grand corruption‟ that sets in when the political class frames
legislation or policies with the sole objective of benefitting a certain class of people
alone. For example, a questionable policy which cripples the economic condition of
the country might be formulated by the government with the sole aim of helping
certain private businessmen, with quid pro quo. This is contrary to the concept of
Good Governance.‟ In Abdul Farook v Municipal Council, Perambalur and Ors”18,
the Apex Court observed that the Doctrine of Good Governance requires the
government to rise above its political interests and act only in public interest and for
the welfare of its people. In the State of Maharashtra and others v Jalgaon Municipal
Corporation19 and others, it was held that one of the principles of good governance in
a democratic society is that private and smaller interests must always give way to
larger public interests in case of a conflict.
2. Infrastructure Problem: One of the major problems faced by the public authorities
that prevent them to disclose the information is infrastructure problems. Many public
authority offices in village and backward areas lack proper infrastructure. In many
offices there is no computer or if there is any computer or laptop then there is either
only one computer in the staff of many people. This is one of the major hindrances in
disclosure of information because they have hardly any resources to publish any
information on the websites because there is hardly any computer or laptop and this is
also a major problems and challenges to RTI Act.

18
2009 (15) SCC 351.
19
2003 (9) SCC 731.

12 | P a g e
 3. Non- Maintenance of Websites: This problem is also a major hindrance in Suo motu
Disclosure and therefore to RTI Act. This includes not publishing obvious and
important items of information on websites, not publishing relevant facts before
taking key policy decisions, poor record management practices and so on. In its
Annual Report (2012-13), the Central Information Commission (CIC) lamented that
despite having good information & communication technology (ICT) infrastructure,
mandatory disclosure norms remain unattended. Only 568 public authorities had so
far reported posting of their Section 4(1) (b) disclosures on their websites 20.
4. One-sided usage of the enactment by the common man: The common man tends to
use RTI for private purposes than to expose corruption. It is primarily the journalists,
NGO members and some well-known anti-corruption crusaders who constantly file
RTI applications when they feel that there is some sort of foul play in the system.
However, government departments are wary of the above-mentioned people,
especially journalists, and so they tend to refuse information or sometimes give
incomplete information.21
5. Lack of Personnel: The government departments recruit fewer employees as
compared to their sanctioned strength. So the PIOs and other staff are already
overburdened and on top of it, when they are asked to do an arduous task with no sort
of incentive, they do not work as effectively to provide information.
6. Lack of Cooperation from the Public Authorities and the Political Class: Many of
the public authorities and the political class have been and are doing their best to keep
the veil of secrecy on their affairs. There is a tendency to give too much of
information, in addition to what is asked, which often confuses and misguides the RTI
applicant. Specific information pertaining to what is asked is not given. Sometimes,
applications are returned with flimsy reasons like citing that there is no proper
signature. Each state government makes its own set of amendments to exempt its
bodies from RTI purview. For example, in Tamil Nadu, the cyber crime cell and the
Home (Police VII) Department is exempted. The Government in Kerala is wary of
making all cabinet decisions within the purview of RTI.22 A wilful delay is seen

20
https://cic.gov.in/sites/default/files/Reports/AR2012-13E_0.pdf (June 15, 2019, 4:10 PM).
21
Gopika Nambiar, Right To Information As An Anti-Corruption Tool, NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies,
January 2018, at 79.
22
Kerala: Pinarayi Vijayan says all Cabinet Decisions won’t fall under RTI, The Indian Express
(Thiruvananthapuram, 20 January 2017)http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/thiruvananthapuram/kerala-
pinarayi-vijayan-says-all-cabinet-decision-wont-fall-under-rti-4483753/.

13 | P a g e
 sometimes while responding to RTI applications that question any dubious practice in
a department. Then even if the applicant gets a favourable order from the Chief
Information Officer, the public authorities prefer an appeal to the High Court. The
backlog of cases and the years it takes for the adjudication process to be completed is
a boon for them as it helps to cover up their sham.
7. Low Public Awareness: Low awareness level: Section 26 of the Act states that the
appropriate Government may develop and organize educational programmes to
advance the understanding of the public, especially disadvantaged communities,
regarding how to exercise the rights contemplated under the Act. However, as per the
survey it was revealed that only 15% of the respondents were aware of the RTI Act 23.
The Nodal Departments (with specific reference to the State Governments studied)
have not undertaken any substantial steps to promote the RTI Act. It was observed
that the awareness was least among the disadvantageous sections of the community
such as women, rural population and OBC/SC/ST category. During the awareness
survey, it was also observed that the major sources of this awareness were:
• Mass media channels like television channels, newspapers etc.
• Word of mouth.
8. Political Parties not yet within the purview of RTI: Six national parties in India
including the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Indian National Congress have refused to
comply with the Central Information Commission Order of 2013 declaring them as
public authorities. 24The Commission held that that even though political parties are
non-governmental organisations yet they wield and influence the exercise of
governmental power and, thus, it is imperative for political parties to be transparent.

23
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Final Understanding the “Key Issues and Constraints” in implementing the RTI Act
at 37, 38.
24
CIC/AT/A/2007/01029&01263-01270.

14 | P a g e
 UTILIZING RTI EFFECTIVELY TO COMBAT CORRUPTION- SUGGESTIONS

 Imparting proper on-the-job training to PIOs: PIOs should be given proper

training both before and during their tenure so that they can apply their minds
independently and decide whether the information can be given and to what extent.
They must be made to understand the purpose of the legislation and their own
significance in exposing corruption and accelerating the country’s development.
 Changing the Composition of the Committee for the Appointment of PIOs -
Under Sections 12 and 15 of the RTI Act, the Chief Information Commissioners and
Information Commissioners at both Central and State Government are appointed by a
Committee headed by the Prime Minister and the Chief Minister, respectively, and
comprising the opposition leader and a Cabinet Minister to be nominated by the Prime
Minister/Chief Minister. This structure is slightly misbalanced because out of the
three people appointing, two are a part of the ruling government. Therefore, this may
give rise to circumstances wherein the government appoints its own loyalist to the
post to ensure that the whistleblower is kept at bay. In the present scenario, where
PIOs are already reluctant to give information, this could be dangerous. Thus, it is
suggested that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or his/her nominee should also
be a part of the Committee that appoints Information Commissioners. There should
not be any veto power and the decision by the majority should be final. This will
ensure a proper check-and-balance system.
 Prohibiting Disclosure of Applicants’ Details: There have been instances of
government leaking information about the details of the RTI applicants, which has
subjected the latter to blackmailing, threats and even death. Not only should the
Whistleblowers Protection Act be strictly enforced, but also a specific provision
should be imposed in the RTI Act that prohibits disclosure of details of the RTI
applicant and imposing a punishment to those, who act on the contrary.
 Constituting Separate Benches: To reduce the backlog of appeals pertaining to the
RTI Act in the High Courts and the Supreme Court, separate benches may be
constituted both in the High Courts and the Supreme Court to dispose of the matters
quickly. 25

25
Gopika Nambiar, Right To Information As An Anti-Corruption Tool, NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies,
January 2018, at 83, 84.

15 | P a g e
  Adequate Staffing: The recruitment in government departments must match the
vacancies. Overburdening of work on the shoulders of a few is also one of the reasons
for an incessant denial of information.

 Digitising all Records: Compulsory digitisation of records must be done. The

government can make use of the skilled but unemployed youth in the country to do
the same.

 Broadening the Scope of Public Authorities: The definition of “public authorities”

under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act is a bit narrow and should be broadened to include
all bodies and institutions that discharge public functions, though they may not come
within the ambit of State as per Article 12of the Indian Constitution.

 Including political parties under the ambit of RTI: All national and regional
political parties must be subject to RTI.26

26
Ibid.

16 | P a g e
 CONCLUSION

The significance of the RTI Act (2005) in the journey to curb the cancerous growth of
corruption cannot be undermined. Without it, legislation such as the Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988 and even the Lokpal and Lokayukta Acts, 2013 are nothing but toothless tigers.
However, there is a need for changes in both the legislation and the mindsets of the governing
class, who need to realise that transparency and accountability are inseparable parts of a
democracy; the fact that they are not doing a favour to the citizenry by providing information.
All the three wings of the state, including the judiciary has to embrace this ideal. At the same
time, the people ought to realise that this particular piece of legislation is meant for each one
of us to be active participants in ridding the system of this taint and contributing to the
country’s development; it is not a task to be just left to NGOs or certain whistleblowers or
journalists. Effective and full use of the Act by vigilant citizens alone can root out the menace
of corruption from the system.

17 | P a g e