Proposed Design For Marine Facilities R1

STAGE-1 BID DOCUMENT
EPC SUMBAWA TERMINAL AND REGAS FACILITY PROJECT

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
PROPOSED DESIGN FOR MARINE FACILITIES
EPC SUMBAWA LNG TERMINAL
& REGAS FACILITY PROJECT
FOR
PT. MEDCO POWER INDONESIA
AT
INDONESIA
January 14th, 2022
Consortium of
PT. Inti Karya Persada Tehnik – PT. Wijaya Karya (Persero) Tbk.
Bidding Page 1 of 29
EPC Sumbawa Terminal and Regas Facility Project
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
TABLES OF CONTENTS
TABLES OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 2

LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. 4
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... 5
ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 6
1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 7
1.1. PROJECT DEFINITION ................................................................................................... 7
1.2. PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................... 7
1.3. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 8
1.3.1. CLIENT DOCUMENTS ....................................................................................... 8
1.3.2. CODES AND STANDARDS ............................................................................... 8
1.4. LANGUANGE, UNITS, AND DIMENSION..................................................................... 10
1.4.1. LANGUAGE ...................................................................................................... 10
1.4.2. UNITS................................................................................................................ 10
1.4.3. DIMENSION ...................................................................................................... 10
2. SITE CONDITION AND DATA ................................................................................. 10

2.1. REFERENCE WATER LEVELS .................................................................................... 10
2.2. COORDINATE SYSTEM ............................................................................................... 10
2.3. BATHYMETRY AND TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................... 11
2.4. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITION...................................................................................... 11
2.5. MARINE GROWTH ........................................................................................................ 11
3. DESIGN CRITERIA................................................................................................... 12
3.1. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY ................................................................................................. 12
3.2. DESIGN LIFE ................................................................................................................. 12
3.3. DESIGN VESSELS ........................................................................................................ 13
3.4. REQUIRED DEPTH AND TOP DECK ELEVATION...................................................... 14
3.5. MATERIAL ..................................................................................................................... 14
3.5.1. CONCRETE ...................................................................................................... 14
3.5.2. CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT ..................................................................... 14
3.5.3. CONCRETE COVER ........................................................................................ 15
3.5.4. STEEL PIPE AND CONCRETE SPUN PILES ................................................. 15
3.5.5. STRUCTURAL STEEL...................................................................................... 16
3.5.6. FIXTURES ........................................................................................................ 16
3.5.7. FENDERS AND FRONTAL PAD ...................................................................... 16
3.6. CORROSION ALLOWANCE AND CORROSION PROTECTION................................. 16
3.6.1. PROTECTIVE COATING .................................................................................. 16
3.6.2. CATHODIC PROTECTION ............................................................................... 17
3.6.3. FIREPROOFING ............................................................................................... 17
3.7. DISPLACEMENT CRITERIA ......................................................................................... 17
3.8. GEOTECHNICAL AND PILE FOUNDATION SAFETY FACTOR ................................. 17
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
3.8.1. PILE FOUNDATION.......................................................................................... 17
3.8.2. TERMINATION OF PILE DRIVING .................................................................. 18
3.8.3. PDA TEST ......................................................................................................... 18
3.8.4. SLOPES AND RETAINING STRUCTURES ..................................................... 18
4. LAYOUT DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 18

4.1. GENERAL ...................................................................................................................... 18
4.2. BERTHING STUDY ....................................................................................................... 19
4.2.1. APPROACH ...................................................................................................... 19
4.2.2. FENDER LAYOUT ............................................................................................ 19
4.2.3. ANGULAR BERTHING ..................................................................................... 20
4.2.4. FENDER VERTICAL ARRANGEMENT............................................................ 20
4.3. MOORING LINE ............................................................................................................. 20
4.3.1. HORIZONTAL MOORING LINE ANGLE .......................................................... 21
4.3.2. VERTICAL MOORING LINE ANGLE................................................................ 21
4.4. TURNING BASIN ........................................................................................................... 21
5. DREDGING ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................... 22

6. OPERABILITY ASSESSMENT ................................................................................ 23
7. DESIGN LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS ...................................................... 23
7.1. DEAD LOAD .................................................................................................................. 23
7.2. LIVE LOAD ..................................................................................................................... 23
7.2.1. DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOAD .............................................................................. 23
7.2.2. PIPING LOAD ................................................................................................... 24
7.2.3. EQUIPMENT LOAD .......................................................................................... 24
7.3. MOORING LOAD ........................................................................................................... 24
7.4. BERTHING LOAD .......................................................................................................... 24
7.5. WIND LOAD ................................................................................................................... 25
7.6. CURRENT LOAD ........................................................................................................... 25
7.7. WAVE LOAD .................................................................................................................. 25
7.8. SEISMIC LOAD .............................................................................................................. 26
7.9. LOAD COMBINATIONS................................................................................................. 27
7.9.1. SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE ...................................................................... 27
7.9.2. ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE.................................................................................. 28
7.9.3. LOAD COMBINATION ...................................................................................... 29
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Convention of conversion (units) .............................................................................. 10

Table 2. Water levels ............................................................................................................. 10
Table 3. Coordinate reference system ................................................................................... 11
Table 4. Marine growth thickness .......................................................................................... 11
Table 5. Drag and inertia coefficients for circular piles .......................................................... 12
Table 6. Design life of marine facilities ................................................................................... 12
Table 7. Vessel characteristics data ...................................................................................... 13
Table 8. Concrete material ..................................................................................................... 14
Table 9. Concrete crack width criteria .................................................................................... 14
Table 10. Reinforcement bar criteria ...................................................................................... 15
Table 11. Concrete cover ....................................................................................................... 15
Table 12. Typical characteristic of steel pipe piles ................................................................. 15
Table 13. Corrosion rate ........................................................................................................ 16
Table 14. Minimum safety factor for axially loaded piles ........................................................ 18
Table 15. Breasting dolphins spacing .................................................................................... 20
Table 16. Dredging assessment ............................................................................................ 22
Table 17. Typical dead load value ......................................................................................... 23
Table 18. Distributed live load ................................................................................................ 23
Table 19. Minimum breaking load of ropes ............................................................................ 24
Table 20. Berthing parameters ............................................................................................... 25
Table 21. Load combination for serviceability limit state ........................................................ 27
Table 22. Load combination for ultimate limit state ................................................................ 28
Table 23. Summary of load combination ................................................................................ 29
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Project location at the south west side of Sumbawa Island ...................................... 7
Figure 2. Enlarged project location at the entrance of Benete Bay .......................................... 8
Figure 3. Enlarged bathymetry and topography data at site location ..................................... 11
Figure 4. Jetty layout .............................................................................................................. 19
Figure 5. Typical fender spacing for island berth type of jetty ................................................ 19
Figure 6. Typical mooring arrangement ................................................................................. 20
Figure 7. Vertical mooring angle ............................................................................................ 21
Figure 8. Turning basin area .................................................................................................. 22
Figure 9. Respons spectrum design ...................................................................................... 26
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
ABBREVIATIONS
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
1. INTRODUCTION
PT. Medco Power Indonesia (hereinafter referred as Company) is entitled to provide power in
Sumbawa, Nusa Tenggara Barat. In order to provide power as intended, Company will develop
Combined Cycled Power Plant (CCPP) with natural gas used as its feed. Natural gas feed to
CCPP will be supplied by LNG Regasification Terminal.
This study covers Sumbawa LNG Regasification Terminal project which builds the LNG
regasification facility consists of LNG storage hub terminal with associated regasification facility
that will produce natural gas export to CCPP.
The terminal will operate continuously in receiving and store LNG that is uploaded from LNG
Carrier. The LNG terminal will consist of Jetty, LNG Storage Tank, and Regasification plant
with boil-off gas (BOG) recovery to prevent gas venting or flaring during normal operation
complete with its auxiliary utility system as required.
1.1. PROJECT DEFINITION

COMPANY : PT MEDCO POWER INDONESIA, who will be the owner of
all equipment under the project.
CONTRACTOR : CONSORTIUM IKPT – WIJAYA KARYA, A design and/or
construction company acting on behalf of COMPANY.
VENDOR : The supplier (manufacturee or distributor) of equipment
purchased by CONTRACTOR.
OTHERS : The party which have been contracted by COMPANY to
supply equipment, service or material.
1.2. PROJECT LOCATION
Figure 1. Project location at the south west side of Sumbawa Island
Marine facilities will be located in the Sumbawa Island, the second island after Bali, and closer
to Lombok, which is the contact island for air traffic and ferry trips.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Figure 2. Enlarged project location at the entrance of Benete Bay
Jetty structure will be located at about ±350 m to the West Site of the entrance to Benete Bay,
directly connected to the LNG Terminal, which location will be sitting on the seashore beside
the existing coal fired power plant.
1.3. REFERENCES
1.3.1. CLIENT DOCUMENTS

The following client specifications have been regarded and have been incorporated in this
basis of design where relevant:
1) Part C1 – Technical Specification (MFS – Sumbawa LNG Storage and Regasification
Terminal)
2) Part C2 - Requirement Other Than MFS_R1
1.3.2. CODES AND STANDARDS

The design and construction of marine facilities will be conducted in accordance with following
codes and standards:
1) BS 6349-1-1:2013 Maritime works - General: Code of Practice for Planning and
Design for Operations
2) BS 6349-1-2:2016 + A1:2017 Maritime works - General: Code of Practice for
Assessment of Actions
3) BS 6349-2:2019 Maritime works - Code of Practice for The Design of Quay Walls,
Jetties and Dolphins
4) BS 6349-4:2014 Maritime works - Code of Practice for The Design Fendering and
Mooring Systems
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
5) BS 6349-5:1991 Maritime structures - Code of practice for dredging and land
reclamation
6) BS 8004:2015 Code of practice for foundations
7) BS EN ISO 12944 Paint and varnishes - Corrosion protection of steel structures by
protective paint systems
8) BS EN 13174 Cathodic protection for harbour installations
9) BS EN 12696 Cathodic protection of steel in concrete, BSI 2000
10) BS EN 12812 Falsework, Performance requirements and general design, BSI, 2004
11) SNI 1726-2019 Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan
Gedung dan non-Gedung
12) OCIMF Mooring Equipment Guidelines
13) OCIMF Guidelines and Recommendations for the Safe Mooring of Large Ships at
Piers and Sea Islands
14) OCIMF Recommendations for Oil Tanker Manifolds and Associated Equipment
15) PIANC WG33-2002 Guidelines for The Design of Fender Systems
16) PIANC WG121-2014 Harbour Approach Channels Design Guidelines
17) PIANC WG116 Safety aspects affecting the Berthing Operations of Tankers to Oil and
Gas Terminals
18) ISGOTT International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals
19) NFPA 58 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code
20) Recommendations of the Committee for Waterfront Structures Harbours and
Waterways EAU
21) DNV-RP-B401 Cathodic protection design
22) Port Designer’s Handbook, Carl. A. Thoresen
23) Pile Design and Construction Practice, Michael Tomlinson and John Woodward
24) API RP 5LW Recommended Practice for Transportation of Line Pipe on Barges and
Marine Vessels
25) Safety and Health in Ports, ILO Code of Practice, International Labour Organization
26) BS EN 62305 – 2 Protection against lightning, Part 2 – Risk Management
27) ISPS International Ship and Port Facility Security Code
28) Aids to Navigation Guide (Navguide), International Association of Lighthouse
Authorities (IALA)
29) ISO 10474 or EN 10204 Steel and steel products – Inspection documents
30) MARPOL Annexes and their amendments ANNEX I-VI
31) Indonesian National Codes (SNI)
32) OCDI - The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
1.4. LANGUANGE, UNITS, AND DIMENSION
1.4.1. LANGUAGE
English shall be used in the entire document.
1.4.2. UNITS
International system of units (SI) shall be used, except for nominal pipe size may be in inches.
Table 1. Convention of conversion (units)

NO. PARAMETER SI UNIT METER-GRAVITATION YARD-POUND UNIT
1. Mass 1 kg 1 kg 2.20462 lb
1N 1/9.80665 kgf 1/4.44823 lbf
2. Force
1 kN 1/9.80665 tonf 1/4.44823 kips
1 mm 1 mm 1/25.4 in
3. Length
1m 1m 1/0.3048 ft (1 ft = 12 in)
4. Pressure 1 kN/m2 1/9.80665 tonf/m2 1/6.89477 lbf/in2
5. Stress 1 N/mm2 100/9.80665 kgf/cm2 103/6.89477 psi (lbf/in2 = psi)
1.4.3. DIMENSION
All dimensions shall be expressed in millimeters, unless noted otherwise.
2. SITE CONDITION AND DATA
2.1. REFERENCE WATER LEVELS

Reference levels for all marine facilities shall refer to Indian Spring Low Water (ISLW). The
relation between the corresponding (water) levels is presented below:
Table 2. Water levels
NO. DATUM ELEVATION CHART DATUM

1. Recorded Extreme Highest High Water 3.31 m
2. Large Tide Higher High Water 3.07 m
3. Mean Tide Higher High Water 2.60 m
4. Mean Sea Level (MSL), Mean Water Level 1.44 m
5. Mean Tide Lower Low Water 0.50 m
6. Large Tide Lower Low Water 0.20 m
7. Indian Spring Low Water (ISLW) 0.00 m
8. Recorded Extreme Lowest Low Water -0.13 m
2.2. COORDINATE SYSTEM

UTM grid system shall be used throughout the project. The reference coordinates are defined
in the following reference system:
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Table 3. Coordinate reference system
NO. PARAMETERS VALUE

1. Reference coordinate system UTM
2. Spheroid WGS84
3. Zone 50S
4. Unit Metric
2.3. BATHYMETRY AND TOPOGRAPHY

Bathymetry and topography data has been provided by COMPANY and shall be used for
marine facilities design. The LNG terminal will be levelled 10 meter above MSL, thus sloping
causeway shall be built for connecting deck trestle to ground level of LNG terminal. Bathymetry
and topography data are presented as follows:
Figure 3. Enlarged bathymetry and topography data at site location
2.4. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITION

Soil investigations will be conducted by COMPANY and shall be used throughout design
process. By the time of this document issued, soil investigations have not been provided by
COMPANY.
2.5. MARINE GROWTH

Marine growth shall be assumed to be at least as follows:
Table 4. Marine growth thickness
NO. LOCATION VALUE

1. Around splash zone 0.15 m
2. Below ISLW 0.1 m
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Minimum drag and inertia coefficients to be used for circular piles:
Table 5. Drag and inertia coefficients for circular piles

NO. COEFFICIENT TYPE VALUE
1. Drag coefficient (smooth surface) 0.7
2. Drag coefficient (rough surface) 1.16
3. Inertia coefficient 2
3. DESIGN CRITERIA
3.1. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

Marine facilities design shall be in accordance with good engineering practices and in
compliance with the latest editions and revisions (unless noted otherwise) of the Codes,
Standards and Guidelines stated in section 1.3. The design shall take into consideration all the
applicable loads and transfer them into realistic load combinations. Appropriate use of load
factors and material factors is required. Mix of Codes, Standards and Guidelines shall be
avoided, and a single coherent approach shall be followed.
Design shall be done with appropriate software and shall include 3D modelling. Individual items
may be designed as separate units with the provision that interaction between the elements is
properly addressed. Deflections shall be in line with the requirements from the applicable
Codes and Standards as minimum and suitable to accommodate the intended topside pipe
work and equipment. The design shall consider the following Limit State Conditions:
1) Serviceability Limit State (SLS)
2) Ultimate Limit State (ULS)
3.2. DESIGN LIFE

Design life of marine facilities including maintenance schedule and repair/replacement criteria
are summarized in the following table:
Table 6. Design life of marine facilities

DESIGN PERIOD TO ROUTINE UNACCEPTABLE
NO. ELEMENT WORKING FIRST MAINTENANCE REPAIR/
LIFE MAINTENANCE BY OWNER REPLACEMENT
Cutting out/replacement
Marine structure – 40 years 40 years of defective/cracked/
1. None
concrete Jetty works Jetty works spalled concrete and
corroded reinforcement
Marine structure – 40 years 40 years of defective/cracked/
2. None
concrete piling Jetty works Jetty works spalled concrete and
corroded reinforcement
of defective/corroded
Marine Structure – 40 years 40 years steel or its fixing; welding
3. None
steel piling Jetty works Jetty works of steel plates onto
existing steel structures/
elements
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Re-coating of
of defective/corroded
Structural 40 years protective
steel or its fixing; welding
4. steelworks (other 15 years treatment
Jetty works of steel plates onto
than piling) systems every
existing steel structures/
15 years
elements
Periodic, Any removal/
normal, and replacement of any items
To suit routine routine or parts of equipment
maintenance maintenance of and controls, pipes,
program all items of cables, ducts,
5. E&M installations 25 years
following equipment/ components,
manufacturer’s controls accessories, fittings,
requirements following fixings, etc. but excluding
manufacturer’s consumables, e.g.,
manuals filters, lamps, fuses, etc.
Re-coating of
protective
40 years treatment Cutting out/replacement
6. Fender steelworks 20 years systems every of defective/corroded
Jetty works 15 years; steel or its fixing
Annual visual
inspection
To suit routine Any fender replacement
maintenance which is not due to
program damage from an
7. Rubbers 20 years -
following accident while berthing
manufacturer’s or excessively abnormal
requirements loads
Re-coating of
protective Cutting out/replacement
8. Quick release hooks 25 years 15 years treatment of defective/corroded
systems every steel or its fixing
15 years
Repainting
limited (5%) Repainting white lines/
9. Road markings 2 years 2 years sections of worn loss/faintness of
or faint lines/ markings
markings
3.3. DESIGN VESSELS

Marine facilities shall be suitable for receiving and handling of vessels within the range of the
smallest of 20.000 m3 LNG carriers and the largest of 170.000 m3 LNG carriers. Vessel data
are summarized as follows:
Table 7. Vessel characteristics data

CAPACITY LOA BREADTH DRAFT
NO.
(m3) (m) (m) (m)
1. 170.000* 295 47.2 12.8
2. 20.000** 145.7 26.7 6.5
*) preliminary vessel characteristic from BS 6349-1-1:2013
**) taken from LNG carriers designed by Severnoye DB
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
3.4. REQUIRED DEPTH AND TOP DECK ELEVATION
The required depth for the jetty vertical channel and turning basin shall be determined based
on BS 6349 guidelines. Underkeel clearance (UKC) shall be taken as 1.1 time of full loaded
draft of the largest vessel. Therefore, the UKC value is:
𝑈𝐾𝐶 = 1.1 ∗ 12.8
𝑈𝐾𝐶 = 14.08 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
Top deck elevation of the dolphin/platform shall be determined with taking consideration of the
highest top of wave crest and the loaded and ballasted freeboard of the design vessel during
high and low water levels. A nominal air gap of 500mm shall be provided between the soffit of
any structures supporting pipework and maximum wave crest level when measured from the
Mean High-Water Spring (MHWS). In general, the minimum air gap for the soffit of the platform
deck slab structure should be 200-300mm. Top deck elevation is calculated as +6m from ISLW.
3.5. MATERIAL
3.5.1. CONCRETE
Concrete grade shall be minimum grade f’c = 35 MPa (cylinder compressive strength) for all
structural elements according to ACI 318 or equivalent. Details reference for concrete material
are as follow:
Table 8. Concrete material

NO. CONCRETE MATERIAL REFERENCES
1. Cement ASTM C150, Type I (plus silica fume) or V
2. Aggregate ASTM C33
3. Water ASTM C1602
Concrete cover shall not be less than BS 6349 requirements, with the absolute minimum values
are shown in the table below. Crack width in structural elements should be limited to 0.2 mm
at 50mm cover. For prestressed girder design shall be based on a condition that no crack
allowed or a maximum of 0.1mm to occur at serviceability limit state.
Table 9. Concrete crack width criteria

CRACK WIDTH
NO. EXPOSURE CONDITION
(inch/mm)
1. Dry air or protective membrane 0.016/0.41
2. Humidity, moist air, soil 0.012/0.30
3. Deicing chemicals 0.007/0.18
4. Seawater and sweater spray, wetting, and drying 0.006/0.15
5. Water retaining structures 0.004/0.10
3.5.2. CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT

Design and specification of materials for reinforcement steel shall take regard to requirements
to achieve a durable and low maintenance structure in the exposed marine environment at the
site. The following requirements for reinforcement steel are considered:
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Table 10. Reinforcement bar criteria
REINFORCEMENT BAR MIN. YIELD STRENGTH

NO. REFERENCES
TYPE (MPa)
1. Deformed steel bar 390 ASTM A615/A615M Gr.60 or equivalent
2. Plain round steel bar 240 ASTM A615/A615M Gr.60 or equivalent
3.5.3. CONCRETE COVER

In this project, concrete covers are determined according following table:
Table 11. Concrete cover
NOMINAL COVER
NO. ELEMENT SIDE
(mm)
Top 100
1. Pile cap and concrete block Side 100
Bot 100
Top 60
2. Beam Side 60
Bot 80
Top 60
3. Slab and column Side 60
Bot 60
Top 40
4. Infill concrete Side 40
Bot 40
3.5.4. STEEL PIPE AND CONCRETE SPUN PILES

The material of the steel pipe piles shall refer to ASTM A252, Spiral Welded. Following are
typical characteristic of steel pipe piles used in the design process:
Table 12. Typical characteristic of steel pipe piles

DIAMETER THICKNESS
NO. GRADE
(mm) (mm)
1. 711 14 SPP Grade 2 (240 MPa)
2. 812 14 SPP Grade 2 (240 MPa)
3. 914 14 SPP Grade 3 (310 MPa)
4. 1016 19 SPP Grade 3 (310 MPa)
5. 800 120 CSP Class C
6. 400 75 CSP Class B
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
3.5.5. STRUCTURAL STEEL
Structural steel profile shall be in accordance with JIS G3101 or ASTM A36 with minimum yield
strength of 2400 kg/cm2 (fy = 235 MPa).
3.5.6. FIXTURES
All fixtures (bolts, nuts, cast in anchor bolts) shall be hot dip galvanized according to BS 729
(or equivalent) or shall be of stainless steel where appropriate. Where stainless steel bolts or
anchors make contact with other dissimilar metals, they shall be electrically insulated to prevent
bi-metallic corrosion.
3.5.7. FENDERS AND FRONTAL PAD

The rubber fender unit shall be molded from a material which homogeneous and free from any
defects, impurities, pores, cracks or other defects. Plates used at mounting locations shall be
completely embedded in rubber material with no steel exposed. All mounting bolts shall be type
AISI 316 stainless steel.
The Vendor shall confirm the maximum fender reaction for the specified berthing and mooring
loads together with a statement of the percentage shear that the fender system can absorb
due to vessels surge while berthed.
3.6. CORROSION ALLOWANCE AND CORROSION PROTECTION

Corrosion allowances shall be deducted from steel sections before calculating their capacity.
Where different corrosion allowances are applicable at different locations on a single member
then strength and capacity may be considered at each location separately. Following are
typical corrosion rates criteria divided based on zonation:
Table 13. Corrosion rate
CORROSION RATE
NO. CORROSION ZONE
(mm/year/side)
1. Buried zone 0.03
2. Immersion zone 0.20
3. Tidal zone 0.30
4. Splash zone 0.30
5. Atmospheric zone 0.10
In assessing the allowance for loss of steel, the allowance can be reduced to take into account
the life of any protective systems if this can be justified. The assumptions are taken as follows:
1) The corrosion allowance shall be considered over a minimum period of 10 years,
irrespective of any protection system applied.
2) No paint system shall be deemed to protect for a period of greater than 15 years.
3.6.1. PROTECTIVE COATING

Steel members and steel piles shall be coated with a system complying with BS EN ISO 12944
to corrosive class C4 where appropriate, with 15 years to first maintenance. Planned
maintenance recoating shall be assumed as twice during the design life. Recoating shall be
considered impractical below a low water level.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Fixings and fastenings shall be hot-dip galvanized complying with BS EN ISO 1461 with a
minimum average coating weight of 610g/m2.
Small steel components, such as hand railing, etc, shall be galvanized. Safety features shall
be finished in yellow.
3.6.2. CATHODIC PROTECTION

A cathodic protection system could be used in combination with other protective systems
(coatings, sacrificial allowance of steel). A cathodic protection system shall be provided utilizing
a sacrificial anode cathodic protection system. The system shall be designed to be effective
against accelerated low water corrosion.
3.6.3. FIREPROOFING
The minimum fireproofing requirement is for three hours of protection time against a
hydrocarbon-type fire. It is assumed that after this period, structures can be cooled by water,
or operational staff has been evacuated. Where effective water cooling is not feasible (e.g.,
due to the configuration of the structure), the required duration of the fire resistance depends
on the estimated time to burn-out or extinguishment. The protection is necessary for steel
support structures where their sudden collapse due to fire would seriously endanger personnel,
lead to the release of large quantities of flammable products and/or toxic materials, lead to
consequences beyond the property limit (including environmental damage), or endanger major
equipment.
The location and extent of the fireproofing zones shall comprise:
1) Jetty.
2) Any structures designated as part of the emergency access/egress routes.
Fireproofing shall extend down to a low water level.
3.7. DISPLACEMENT CRITERIA

Maximum lateral displacement of the top of any substructure support shall be limited to lesser
of H/300 with maximum limit is 100 mm. H is the distance from the level of bearing support to
the point of virtual fixity of piles. This limit shall be applicable to the operating SLS condition.
The point of virtual fixity shall be established to suit the ground condition at the site.
Vertical deflection of beams and deck members shall be limited to span/200 for catilevers and
span/180 for others members. Maximum deflection of beams and deck members supporting
loading arms shall not exceed span/1000.
3.8. GEOTECHNICAL AND PILE FOUNDATION SAFETY FACTOR
3.8.1. PILE FOUNDATION

The bearing capacity/foundation design of driven steel piles shall be carried out in accordance
with the recommendations presented in API RP 2A-WSD. For other type of piles such as pre-
cast concrete piles and concrete cast-in-place piles design shall be complied with
recommendation of M. J. Tomlinson, "Pile Design and Construction Practice". The following
table presents an overview of the applicable safety factors for the considered load cases:
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Table 14. Minimum safety factor for axially loaded piles
SAFETY FACTOR SAFETY FACTOR
NO. CONDITION BEARING
IN COMPRESSION IN TENSION
1. Friction bearing 2.5 2.5
Permanent load
2. End bearing 2.5 2.5
Temporary load
PDA test
3.8.2. TERMINATION OF PILE DRIVING

Termination of pile driving shall be developed for pile sizes, pile load, hammer specification
and soil condition used in the design of the piled foundation. Termination criteria shall be
analysed using computer program. A typical of 12.5mm/10blows can be taken into account. All
the piles shall be driven to as depth design and final set.
3.8.3. PDA TEST

PDA Test shall be conducted in order to understand and obtained information in regard to
hammer performance and the result shall be used as pile foundation as built bearing capacity.
3.8.4. SLOPES AND RETAINING STRUCTURES

Minimum safety factors for slope stability are determined by following criteria:
1) Service and Static condition, SF = 1.5
2) Temporary condition, SF = 1.25
3) Seismic Condition, SF = 1.25
4. LAYOUT DEVELOPMENT
4.1. GENERAL
Mooring dolphin spacing – between the outermost dolphins – shall not be less than the vessels
length. Mooring points shall be suitably positioned, and have suitable strength for the
operational conditions. Mooring facilities such as Quick Release Hook (QRH) shall be provided
at all mooring points. Breasting dolphin spacing shall be designed to ensure that the parallel
body of the vessel is properly supported. Fendering for the dolphins, and for the berth face,
shall be to a suitable standard.
Under-keel clearances shall be established in accordance with the sea-bed quality. Turning
areas shall have a minimum diameter of two to three times the vessel’s length using tug boat
and four times without tug boat.
Berthing and mooring structures shall provide safe mooring and berthing for LNG vessels
capacity of 170.000 m3 (import) and 20.000 m3 (export).
Jetty structures shall consist of following arrangement:
1) A minimum four mooring dolphins shall be provided to cater with the breast line and
head stern line.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
2) A minimum four breasting dolphins shall be provided to accommodate LNG vessels
with capacity of 170.000 m3 and 20.000 m3.
Based on vessel data, following are developed jetty layout arrangement:
Figure 4. Jetty layout
4.2. BERTHING STUDY
4.2.1. APPROACH
At ship arrival, the turning, berthing, and mooring manoeuvers will be managed by the Port
Authorities with the assistance of pilots, tug boats, fenders and ship berthing crew Assistance.
Once the ship has been securely moored to the mooring hooks, the ship gangway has been
installed and communications have been established, the liquid unloading and vapor return
arms can be connected and pressure tested and filled up with inert nitrogen. The ship's transfer
piping and the liquid arms will then be cooled-down by means of the ship pumps.
4.2.2. FENDER LAYOUT

BS 6349 requirements are used for verification of the fender layout development. The breasting
dolphin position for the range of vessels in an island berth type of jetty is shown below:
Figure 5. Typical fender spacing for island berth type of jetty
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Table 15. Breasting dolphins spacing
VESSEL MIN. SPACING MAX. SPACING ACTUAL
LOA
NO. CAPACITY LIMIT (0.25LOA) LIMIT (0.4LOA) SPACING REMARKS
(m3) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1. 170.000 295 73.75 118 92.5 OK
2. 20.000 145.7 36.4 58.3 55.5 OK
All breasting dolphins are within the range of 0.25 LOA to 0.4 LOA thus the position of breasting
dolphin is good.
4.2.3. ANGULAR BERTHING

For all vessel range, maximum berthing angle is 6 degrees. The distance from the end of the
vessel to the contact point shall be determined from the fender positions relating to the berthing
target but shall not be less than 35% of the vessel length between perpendiculars (LBP). It
shall be observed that the vessel does not come too close to any other structure during point
of first contact, manoeuvring, and berthing at angle of 6 degrees.
4.2.4. FENDER VERTICAL ARRANGEMENT

The vertical position of the fender shall be arranged in such a way that the smallest and the
largest vessel will have sufficient contact with fenders. In addition, full load vessel in LWS
condition and empty load vessel in HWS condition shall be considered.
4.3. MOORING LINE

Mooring analysis shall be performed to determine the maximum possible loads on the mooring
points. Mooring arrangement shall follow BS 6349 as indicated in the following figure:
Figure 6. Typical mooring arrangement
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
4.3.1. HORIZONTAL MOORING LINE ANGLE
The mooring lines angle of typical island berth is shown in Figure 6. However, slightly larger
angle can be accepted if the mooring line pattern is taken in to consideration in the mooring
analysis to determine line forces and mooring hook capacity.
4.3.2. VERTICAL MOORING LINE ANGLE

The OCIMF guidelines suggest positive upward mooring lines while the tanker in fully loaded
and empty condition as shown in Figure 7. This to avoid negative mooring angles which may
pull the vessel during oscilation due to wave and wind. Hence the deck level shall be sufficiently
low to accommodate this condition.
The variation of vertical mooring angle shall be provided in report. It can be observed that the
vertical mooring angles are less than 25 degree and do not become negative.
Figure 7. Vertical mooring angle
4.4. TURNING BASIN

Turning basin should usually be in the central area of the harbour basin. The minimum diameter
where the ship has tugboat assistance, the turning diameter could be up to 2 times of the length
of the ship. Under very good conditions the diameter might be reduced to 1.6 times the length
as a lower limit.
The depth of turning area shall be designed according to the draft of the largest vessel which
value is 12.8 meters with additional clearance of 10%. In addition, turning basin diameter is
taken as 550 meters which is 1.86 times LOA of the largest vessel.
In this project, turning area will be located at the middle entrance of Benete Bay as shown in
the Figure 8. At this location, the seabed elevation varies between -25 to -40 mISLW which
satisfies the depth requirement for corresponding vessel.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Figure 8. Turning basin area
5. DREDGING ASSESSMENT
Dredging assessment shall be performed in order to comply with the required jetty layout
development. Based on summary on the Table 16, it can be observed that existing bathymetry
condition at site location has satisfied the proposed jetty layout development. Thus, there is no
need to perform dredging works.
Table 16. Dredging assessment

EXISTING SEABED MIN. REQUIRED
NO. SITE LOCATION AREA REMARKS
ELEVATION DEPTH
1. Jetty -20 mISLW 14.08 Comply
2. Turning basin -25 to -40 mISLW 14.08 Comply
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
6. OPERABILITY ASSESSMENT
The marine facilities shall have one berthing line which is located in the front of the jetty
platform. The trestle shall be suitable for pipelines access from LNG terminal to jetty platform.
The jetty platform shall be equipped by loading arms and gangway tower for operational
requirement to import/export LNG from the vessels. The jetty platform will not be equipped with
quick release hook thus the structure shall not be designed for mooring line load. This platform
also shall be not provided with fender system. Emergency ladder shall be provided along with
hard rail.
The jetty will be equipped with access facilities or catwalk to connect mooring dolphins and
breasting dolphins. The width of the access or catwalk shall be a minimum of 1.2m
7. DESIGN LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS
7.1. DEAD LOAD

Dead loads are the weight of the structure’s member as shown in Table 17. Bollards, fender,
and other will be considered as superimposed dead load.
Table 17. Typical dead load value
VALUE
NO. DEAD LOAD TYPE
(kg/m3)
1. Reinforced concrete 2400
2. Prestressed concrete 2500
3. Steel selfweight 7850
4. Wearing surface 2000
7.2. LIVE LOAD
7.2.1. DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOAD

Distributed live load on the structures are determined as follows:
Table 18. Distributed live load

VALUE
NO. DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOAD
(kg/m3)
1. Distributed live load on trestle 1000
2. Distributed live load on platform 1500
3. Distributed live load on mooring dolphin 500
4. Distributed live load on breasting dolphin 500
5. Distributed live load on catwalk 250
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
7.2.2. PIPING LOAD
Piping load consist of following load conditions:
1) Empty Loads are only dead load pipe material include accessories and insulation.
2) Operating loads are dead load plus fluid load of piping during normal operation.
3) Test Loads are dead load plus fluid load of piping during test condition.
The pipe load shall include anchoring force from the pipeline stress and shall be supported by
piperack.
7.2.3. EQUIPMENT LOAD

Equipment loads shall be applied on the structures as point/line/distributed load which consist
of following equipment:
1) Marine loading arms.
2) Gangway tower.
7.3. MOORING LOAD

Safe mooring load/force shall be established in accordance with the minimum breaking limits
of the total number of mooring lines to be put out to a mooring or breasthing dolphin or jetty.
The number of mooring lines will depend on the type of vessel and the maximum number of
mooring lines that can be attached to each one breasthing dolphin will depend on the optimum
mooring line pattern that can be achieved.
Mooring line analysis also shall be taken in order to distribute the tractive force on each mooring
point. Mooring shall be by breast line, spring lines and preferable also bow and stern lines. The
design load on one individual mooring on the structure is based on the Minimum Breaking Load
(MBL) of one individual mooring line, where the SWL of the hook shall not be less than the
MBL of the largest rope anticipated.
Table 19. Minimum breaking load of ropes
7.4. BERTHING LOAD

Berthing energy calculation shall follows BS 6349 guidelines which is formulated as follows:
𝐸𝐶 = 0.5 ∗ 𝐶𝑀 ∗ 𝑀𝐷 ∗ 𝑉𝐵2 ∗ 𝐶𝐸 ∗ 𝐶𝑆 ∗ 𝐶𝐶
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Where:
EC = Berthing energy (kN.m)
CM = Hydrodynamic mass coefficient
MD = Displacement of vessel (ton)
VB = Berthing velocities
CE = Eccentricity coefficient
CS = Softness coefficient
CC = Berth configuration coefficient
Table 20 summarizes all parameters used for berthing load calculation:
Table 20. Berthing parameters

NO. PARAMETER VALUE UNIT
1. Berthing condition Difficult berthing, sheltered -
2. Berthing angle 6 Degrees
3. Berthing position Mid-point berthing -
4. Berth configuration All other cases -
5. Berthing energy factor 1.25 – 1.75 -
It is assumed that vessel berth on one point contact to fender which makes a fender fully absorb
the berthing energy.
7.5. WIND LOAD

Wind speed is taken as 35 m/s and act as a line load acting on deck and piles (above water
level).
7.6. CURRENT LOAD

Current velocity is taken as 0.59 m/s and act along piles above seabed. Current load shall
consider marine growth of 100 mm thick. The current induced drag loads on piles are calculated
by the following formula:
1
𝐹𝐷 = ∗ 𝐶 ∗  ∗ 𝑉 2 ∗ 𝐴𝑛
2 𝐷
Where:
FD = Steady drag force (kN)
CD = Drag coefficient (1.0 for tube pile)
 = Density of fluid (1.025 ton/m3 for the sea water)
V = Incident current velocity (m/s)
An = Area normal to flow (m2)
7.7. WAVE LOAD

The magnitude of wave forces depends not only on the wave height and period and the
dimensions of the structure, but also on the resulting hydrodynamic regime. This is controlled
by the relationship between the width or diameter of the submerged part of the structure or
member, Ws, and the wave length, L, as follows:
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
1) For Ws/L > 1, reflection applies, see BS 6349 part 1, item 39.4.2
2) For 0.2 < Ws/L < 1, diffraction theory applies, BS 6349 part 1, see 39.4.3
3) For Ws/L < 0.2, Morison’s equation applies, BS 6349 part 1, see 39.4.4
Morrison’s equation is described as follows:
𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝐹𝐷 + 𝐹𝐼
1 𝑠𝑖𝑛ℎ(2𝑘ℎ) + 2𝑘ℎ 
𝐹𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑔𝐶𝐷 𝐷𝐻 2 + 𝑔𝐶𝐼 𝐷2 𝐻 𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ(𝑘ℎ)
16 𝑠𝑖𝑛ℎ(2𝑘ℎ) 8
7.8. SEISMIC LOAD

Seismic design condition is that the structure will have minor damage after earthquake taken
place. This is obtained by limiting the structural deflection due to seismic load. Seismic design
is in accordance with SNI 1726-2019. Response spectrum design for corresponding site
location is presented below:
Figure 9. Respons spectrum design
As geotechnical data are not available by the time of this document issued, site class shall be
taken as SE (soft soil) for preliminary design purposes.
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
7.9. LOAD COMBINATIONS
Load Combination shall refer to BS 6349-2 as described below
7.9.1. SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE
Table 21. Load combination for serviceability limit state
L/C
LOAD COMBINATION REMARKS CASE TYPE
NO.
101 W1 + W2 + W3 + T + WIX+ + CU + WA
102 W1 + W2 + W3 + T + WIX- + CU + WA
S1 Environmental Load
103 W1 + W2 + W3 + T + WIZ+ + CU + WA
104 W1 + W2 + W3 + T + WIZ- + CU + WA
105 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + T + WIX+ + CU + WA
106 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + T + WIX- + CU + WA
S2 Environmental Load with Live Load
107 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + T + WIZ+ + CU + WA
108 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + T + WIZ- + CU + WA
109 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + 1.1BN + WIX+ + CU + WA
110 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + 1.1BN + WIX- + CU + WA
S3
111 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + 1.1BN + WIZ+ + CU + WA
112 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + 1.1BN + WIZ- + CU + WA
Berthing Load
113 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + BE + WIX+ + CU + WA
114 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + BE + WIX- + CU + WA
S4
115 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + BE + WIZ+ + CU + WA
116 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + BE + WIZ- + CU + WA
117 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + 1.1MN + WIX+ + CU + WA
118 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + 1.1MN + WIX- + CU + WA
S5
119 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + 1.1MN + WIZ+ + CU + WA
120 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + 1.1MN + WIZ- + CU + WA
Mooring Load
121 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + ME + WIX+ + CU + WA
122 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + ME + WIX- + CU + WA
S6
123 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + ME + WIZ+ + CU + WA
124 W1 + W2 + W3 + 1.1LL + ME + WIZ- + CU + WA
125 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.7ELX+ + 0.21ELZ+
126 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.7ELX+ + 0.21ELZ-
127 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.7ELX- + 0.21ELZ+
128 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.7ELX- + 0.21ELZ-
S7
129 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.21ELX+ + 0.7ELZ+
130 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.21ELX+ + 0.7ELZ-
131 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.21ELX- + 0.7ELZ+
132 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.21ELX- + 0.7ELZ-
Seismic Load
133 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.75LL + 0.525ELX+ + 0.158ELZ+
134 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.75LL + 0.525ELX+ + 0.158ELZ-
135 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.75LL + 0.525ELX- + 0.158ELZ+
136 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.75LL + 0.525ELX- + 0.158ELZ-
S8
137 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.75LL + 0.158ELX+ + 0.525ELZ+
138 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.75LL + 0.158ELX+ + 0.525ELZ-
139 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.75LL + 0.158ELX- + 0.525ELZ+
140 W1 + W2 + W3 + 0.75LL + 0.158ELX- + 0.525ELZ-
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
141 0.6W1 + 0.6W2 + 0.6W3 + 0.6LL + 0.7ELX+ + 0.21ELZ+
142 0.6W1 + 0.6W2 + 0.6W3 + 0.6LL + 0.7ELX+ + 0.21ELZ-
143 0.6W1 + 0.6W2 + 0.6W3 + 0.6LL + 0.7ELX- + 0.21ELZ+
144 0.6W1 + 0.6W2 + 0.6W3 + 0.6LL + 0.7ELX- + 0.21ELZ-
S9
145 0.6W1 + 0.6W2 + 0.6W3 + 0.6LL + 0.21ELX+ + 0.7ELZ+
146 0.6W1 + 0.6W2 + 0.6W3 + 0.6LL + 0.21ELX+ + 0.7ELZ-
147 0.6W1 + 0.6W2 + 0.6W3 + 0.6LL + 0.21ELX- + 0.7ELZ+
148 0.6W1 + 0.6W2 + 0.6W3 + 0.6LL + 0.21ELX- + 0.7ELZ-
7.9.2. ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
Table 22. Load combination for ultimate limit state
L/C CASE
LOAD COMBINATION REMARKS
NO. TYPE
201 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54T + 1.54WIX+ + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
202 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54T + 1.54WIX- + 1.54CU + 1.54WA Environmental

U1
203 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54T + 1.54WIZ+ + 1.54CU + 1.54WA Load
204 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54T + 1.54WIZ- + 1.54CU + 1.54WA

205 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54T + 1.54WIX+ + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
206 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54T + 1.54WIX- + 1.54CU + 1.54WA Environmental
U2 Load with Live
207 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54T + 1.54WIZ+ + 1.54CU + 1.54WA Load
208 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54T + 1.54WIZ- + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
209 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54BN + 1.54WIX+ + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
210 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54BN + 1.54WIX- + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
U3
211 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54BN + 1.54WIZ+ + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
212 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54BN + 1.54WIZ- + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
Berthing Load
213 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.32LL + 1.32BE + 1.32WIX+ + 1.32CU + 1.32WA
214 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.32LL + 1.32BE + 1.32WIX- + 1.32CU + 1.32WA
U4
215 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.32LL + 1.32BE + 1.32WIZ+ + 1.32CU + 1.32WA
216 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.32LL + 1.32BE + 1.32WIZ- + 1.32CU + 1.32WA
217 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54MN + 1.54WIX+ + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
218 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54MN + 1.54WIX- + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
U5
219 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54MN + 1.54WIZ+ + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
220 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.54LL + 1.54MN + 1.54WIZ- + 1.54CU + 1.54WA
Mooring Load
221 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.32LL + 1.32ME + 1.32WIX+ + 1.32CU + 1.32WA
222 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.32LL + 1.32ME + 1.32WIX- + 1.32CU + 1.32WA
U6
223 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.32LL + 1.32ME + 1.32WIZ+ + 1.32CU + 1.32WA
224 1.265W1 + 1.265W2 + 1.32W3 + 1.32LL + 1.32ME + 1.32WIZ- + 1.32CU + 1.32WA
225 1.2W1 + 1.2W2 + 1.2W3 + LL + ELX+ + 0.3ELZ+
226 1.2W1 + 1.2W2 + 1.2W3 + LL + ELX+ + 0.3ELZ-
227 1.2W1 + 1.2W2 + 1.2W3 + LL + ELX- + 0.3ELZ+
228 1.2W1 + 1.2W2 + 1.2W3 + LL + ELX- + 0.3ELZ-
U7
229 1.2W1 + 1.2W2 + 1.2W3 + LL + 0.3ELX+ + ELZ+
Seismic Load
230 1.2W1 + 1.2W2 + 1.2W3 + LL + 0.3ELX+ + ELZ-
231 1.2W1 + 1.2W2 + 1.2W3 + LL + 0.3ELX- + ELZ+
232 1.2W1 + 1.2W2 + 1.2W3 + LL + 0.3ELX- + ELZ-
233 0.9W1 + 0.9W2 + 0.9W3 + ELX+ + 0.3ELZ+
U8
234 0.9W1 + 0.9W2 + 0.9W3 + ELX+ + 0.3ELZ-
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
235 0.9W1 + 0.9W2 + 0.9W3 + ELX- + 0.3ELZ+
236 0.9W1 + 0.9W2 + 0.9W3 + ELX- + 0.3ELZ-
237 0.9W1 + 0.9W2 + 0.9W3 + 0.3ELX+ + ELZ+
238 0.9W1 + 0.9W2 + 0.9W3 + 0.3ELX+ + ELZ-
239 0.9W1 + 0.9W2 + 0.9W3 + 0.3ELX- + ELZ+
240 0.9W1 + 0.9W2 + 0.9W3 + 0.3ELX- + ELZ-
7.9.3. LOAD COMBINATION
Table 23. Summary of load combination
COMBINATION W1 W2 W3 LL MN ME BN BE T WI CU WA EL
S1 No Vessel (Cond.1) 1 1 1 - - - - - 1 1 1 1 -
S2 No Vessel (Cond.2) 1 1 1 1.1 - - - - 1 1 1 1 -
S3 Berthing (Normal) 1 1 1 1.1 - - 1.1 - - 1 1 1 -
S4 Berthing (Extreme) 1 1 1 1.1 - - - 1 - 1 1 1 -
SLS S5 Mooring (Normal) 1 1 1 1.1 1.1 - - - - 1 1 1 -
S6 Mooring (Extreme) 1 1 1 1.1 - 1 - - - 1 1 1 -
S7 Seismic (Cond. 1) 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - 0.7
S8 Seismic (Cond. 2) 1 1 1 0.75 - - - - - - - - 0.525
S9 Seismic (Cond. 3) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 - - - - - - - - 0.7
U1 No Vessel (Cond.1) 1.265 1.265 1.32 - - - - - 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 -
U2 No Vessel (Cond.2) 1.265 1.265 1.32 1.54 - - - - 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.54 -
U3 Berthing (Normal) 1.265 1.265 1.32 1.54 - - 1.54 - - 1.54 1.54 1.54 -
U4 Berthing (Extreme) 1.265 1.265 1.32 1.32 - - - 1.32 - 1.32 1.32 1.32 -
ULS
U5 Mooring (Normal) 1.265 1.265 1.32 1.54 1.54 - - - - 1.54 1.54 1.54 -
U6 Mooring (Extreme) 1.265 1.265 1.32 1.32 - 1.32 - - - 1.32 1.32 1.32 -
U7 Seismic (Cond. 1) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1 - - - - - - - - 1
U8 Seismic (Cond. 2) 0.9 0.9 0.9 - - - - - - - - - 1
Notes:
1) Load factor in combination U7 & U8 may be taken 0.5 except for garage, meeting room, and all rooms that
has live load more than 500 kg/m2
2) Seismic condition: ± 100%ELX ± 30%ELY
3) Seismic condition: ± 30%ELX ± 100%ELY

Proposed Design For Marine Facilities R1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proposed Design For Marine Facilities R1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proposed Design For Marine Facilities R1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STAGE-1 BID DOCUMENT

EPC SUMBAWA TERMINAL AND REGAS FACILITY PROJECT

PROPOSED DESIGN FOR MARINE FACILITIES

EPC SUMBAWA LNG TERMINAL

& REGAS FACILITY PROJECT

PT. MEDCO POWER INDONESIA

January 14th, 2022

TABLES OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 2

2. SITE CONDITION AND DATA ................................................................................. 10

4. LAYOUT DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 18

5. DREDGING ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................... 22

Table 1. Convention of conversion (units) .............................................................................. 10

1.1. PROJECT DEFINITION

1.2. PROJECT LOCATION

Figure 1. Project location at the south west side of Sumbawa Island

Figure 2. Enlarged project location at the entrance of Benete Bay

1.3.1. CLIENT DOCUMENTS

1.3.2. CODES AND STANDARDS

Table 1. Convention of conversion (units)

2. SITE CONDITION AND DATA

2.1. REFERENCE WATER LEVELS

Table 2. Water levels

NO. DATUM ELEVATION CHART DATUM

2.2. COORDINATE SYSTEM

NO. PARAMETERS VALUE

2.3. BATHYMETRY AND TOPOGRAPHY

Figure 3. Enlarged bathymetry and topography data at site location

2.4. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITION

2.5. MARINE GROWTH

Table 4. Marine growth thickness

NO. LOCATION VALUE

Minimum drag and inertia coefficients to be used for circular piles:

Table 5. Drag and inertia coefficients for circular piles

3.1. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

3.2. DESIGN LIFE

Table 6. Design life of marine facilities

3.3. DESIGN VESSELS

Table 7. Vessel characteristics data

Table 8. Concrete material

Table 9. Concrete crack width criteria

3.5.2. CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT

REINFORCEMENT BAR MIN. YIELD STRENGTH

3.5.3. CONCRETE COVER

Table 11. Concrete cover

3.5.4. STEEL PIPE AND CONCRETE SPUN PILES

Table 12. Typical characteristic of steel pipe piles

3.5.7. FENDERS AND FRONTAL PAD

3.6. CORROSION ALLOWANCE AND CORROSION PROTECTION

Table 13. Corrosion rate

3.6.1. PROTECTIVE COATING

3.6.2. CATHODIC PROTECTION

3.7. DISPLACEMENT CRITERIA

3.8. GEOTECHNICAL AND PILE FOUNDATION SAFETY FACTOR

3.8.1. PILE FOUNDATION

3.8.2. TERMINATION OF PILE DRIVING

3.8.3. PDA TEST

3.8.4. SLOPES AND RETAINING STRUCTURES

Figure 4. Jetty layout

4.2. BERTHING STUDY