Structural Analysis Report FBD Vs PBD 1628845299

Structural Analysis Report
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT

5th STORY FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
CAMPUS SCHOOL BUILDING
CONTENTS
CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................. i
LIST OF CHART .................................................................................................................................... iii
LIST OF DRAWING............................................................................................................................... iv
LIST OF TABLE ...................................................................................................................................... v
I. GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................... 1
II. ANALYSIS METHOD .................................................................................................................... 1
III. REFERENCE ................................................................................................................................. 1
IV. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................... 2
V. LOAD SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................... 2
VI. LOAD COMBINATIONS ............................................................................................................... 4
VII. CALCULATING METHOD ............................................................................................................. 5
VIII. PRELIMINARY DESIGN................................................................................................................ 6
IX. ANALYSIS OF THE BUILDING PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN (PBD)........................................ 6
1. MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE BUILDING ............................................................... 6
2. MASS OF THE STRUCTURE BUILDING ......................................................................... 7
3. STRUCTURE ARRANGEMENT ..................................................................................... 8
4. YIELD DRIFT STRUCTURE ........................................................................................... 8
5. EFFECTIVE PERIOD .................................................................................................. 10
6. EFFECTIVE STIFFNESS .............................................................................................. 11
7. EARTHQUAKE FORCE DESIGN .................................................................................. 11
X. ANALYSIS OF THE BUILDING PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN (FBD) ...................................... 12
1. STATIC EARTHQUAKE ARRANGEMENT .................................................................... 12
2. DYNAMIC EARTHQUAKE ARRANGEMENT ................................................................ 13
XI. CONTROL DESIGN PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN (PBD) ...................................................... 14
1. MODAL LOAD PARTICIPATION RATIOS .................................................................... 14
2. MODAL PARTICIPATING MASS RATIOS .................................................................... 14
3. HORIZONTAL IRREGULARITY ................................................................................... 15
A. Torsional & Extreme Torsional Irregularity (1a & 1b) ...................................... 15
B. Reentrant Corner Irregularity ......................................................................... 15
i
C. Diaphragm Discontinuity Irregularity.............................................................. 16

D. Out-of-Plane Offset Irregularity...................................................................... 16
E. Non Parallel System Irregularity ..................................................................... 16
4. VERTICAL IRREGULARITY ......................................................................................... 16
A. Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity ........................................................... 16
B. Weight (Mass) Irregularity ............................................................................. 17
C. Vertical Geometric Irregularity ....................................................................... 18
D. In-Plane Discontinuity in Vertical Lateral Force ............................................... 18
E. Discontinuity in Lateral Strength .................................................................... 18
5. STORY DRIFT ........................................................................................................... 19
6. P – DELTA EFFECT .................................................................................................... 19
XII. CONTROL DESIGN FORCE BASED DESIGN (PBD) ..................................................................... 21
1. MODAL LOAD PARTICIPATION RATIOS .................................................................... 21
2. MODAL PARTICIPATING MASS RATIOS .................................................................... 21
3. HORIZONTAL IRREGULARITY ................................................................................... 22
A. Torsional & Extreme Torsional Irregularity (1a & 1b) ...................................... 22
B. Reentrant Corner Irregularity ......................................................................... 23
C. Diaphragm Discontinuity Irregularity.............................................................. 23
D. Out-of-Plane Offset Irregularity ...................................................................... 23
E. Non Parallel System Irregularity ..................................................................... 23
4. VERTICAL IRREGULARITY ......................................................................................... 24
A. Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity ........................................................... 24
B. Weight (Mass) Irregularity ............................................................................. 24
C. Vertical Geometric Irregularity ....................................................................... 25
D. In-Plane Discontinuity in Vertical Lateral Force ............................................... 25
E. Discontinuity in Lateral Strength .................................................................... 25
5. STORY DRIFT ........................................................................................................... 26
6. P – DELTA EFFECT .................................................................................................... 27
XIII. STRUCTURE REBAR ANALYSIS PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN (PBD) ................................... 28
XIV. STRUCTURE REBAR ANALYSIS FORCE BASED DESIGN (FBD) .................................................. 30
XV. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS FORCE BASED DESIGN (FBD) ........................................................ 32
XVI. PUSHOVER ANALYSIS PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN (PBD) ................................................ 34
ii
XVII. STRCUTURE PROJECT VALUE ................................................................................................... 36

1. SLAB STRUCTURE .................................................................................................... 36
2. BEAMS STRUCTURE ................................................................................................ 37
3. COLUMNS STRUCTURE ............................................................................................ 37
4. UNIT RATE OF WORKS ............................................................................................ 38
5. PROJECT COST VALUE ............................................................................................. 40
A. Concrete Work Unit Price .............................................................................. 40
B. Rebar Unit Price ............................................................................................ 41
C. Project Recapitulation ................................................................................... 41
iii
LIST OF CHART
Chart 1 Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading ............................................................................. 4

Chart 2 Calculation Method of Force Based Design ................................................................ 5
Chart 3 Calculation Method of Performance Based Design .................................................... 5
Chart 4 ADRS Vs Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading X Direction ......................................... 10
Chart 5 ADRS Vs Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading Y Direction ......................................... 10
Chart 6 Story Drift Curve PBD ................................................................................................ 19
Chart 7 P – Delta Curve PBD ................................................................................................... 20
Chart 8 Story Drift Curve FBD ................................................................................................. 27
Chart 9 P – Delta Curve PBD ................................................................................................... 28
iii
LIST OF DRAWING
Figure 1 Model Design of the Structure Building...................................................................... 6

Figure 2 Envelope Moment A – A PBD .................................................................................... 29
Figure 3 Axial Forces of Building Structure PBD ..................................................................... 29
Figure 4 Concrete Rebar Design Check PBD ............................................................................ 30
Figure 5 Envelope Moment A – A PBD .................................................................................... 31
Figure 6 Axial Forces of Building Structure PBD ..................................................................... 31
Figure 7 Concrete Rebar Design Check PBD ............................................................................ 32
iv
LIST OF DRAWING
Table 1 Super Imposed Dead Load 1st – 4th Floors................................................................... 2

Table 2 Super Imposed Dead Load 5th Floors .......................................................................... 2
Table 3 Manual Mass Calculations Summary .......................................................................... 7
Table 4 ETABS Program Mass Calculations Summary ............................................................. 7
Table 5 Manual Mass Vs ETABS Mass ...................................................................................... 7
Table 6 Parameter of Structure Arrangement ......................................................................... 8
Table 7 Parameter of Yield Drift X Direction ........................................................................... 8
Table 8 Parameter of Yield Drift Y Direction ........................................................................... 9
Table 9 Earthquake Force Design per Level X Direction........................................................ 11
Table 10 Earthquake Force Design per Level Y Direction ........................................................ 12
Table 11 Earthquake Static Earthquake Force Distribution Each Floor .................................. 13
Table 12 Earthquake Dynamic Shear Earthquake Force Distribution Each Floor .................. 13
Table 13 Earthquake Dynamic Earthquake Force Distribution Each Floor ............................. 13
Table 14 Modal Load Participation Ratios PBD ....................................................................... 14
Table 15 Modal Mass Participation Ratios PBD ...................................................................... 14
Table 16 PBD Displacement Maximum / Average Displacement X Direction ........................ 15
Table 17 PBD Displacement Maximum / Average Displacement Y Direction ........................ 15
Table 18 PBD Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity.............................................................. 17
Table 19 PBD Mass Summary of Structure .............................................................................. 17
Table 20 PBD Weight (Mass) Irregularity................................................................................. 17
Table 21 PBD Discontinuity in Lateral Strength – Extreme Weak Story Irregularity ............. 18
Table 22 PBD Story Drift Calculation........................................................................................ 19
Table 23 P – Delta Calculation X Direction PBD ....................................................................... 20
Table 24 P – Delta Calculation Y Direction PBD ....................................................................... 20
Table 25 Modal Load Participation Ratios PBD ....................................................................... 21
Table 26 Modal Mass Participation Ratios PBD ...................................................................... 21
Table 27 Modal Mass Participation Ratios PBD Continue ...................................................... 22
Table 28 FBD Displacement Maximum / Average Displacement X Direction ........................ 22
Table 29 FBD Displacement Maximum / Average Displacement Y Direction ........................ 23
v
Table 30 FBD Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity .............................................................. 24

Table 31 FBD Mass Summary of Structure .............................................................................. 24
Table 32 FBD Weight (Mass) Irregularity ................................................................................. 25
Table 33 FBD Discontinuity in Lateral Strength – Extreme Weak Story Irregularity .............. 25
Table 34 FBD Discontinuity in Lateral Strength – Extreme Weak Story Irregularity Con ...... 26
Table 35 FBD Story Drift Calculation ........................................................................................ 26
Table 36 P – Delta Calculation X Direction FBD ....................................................................... 27
Table 37 P – Delta Calculation Y Direction FBD ....................................................................... 28
Table 38 Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result X Direction FBD...................... 32
Table 39 Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result X Direction FBD Continue ...... 33
Table 40 Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result Y Direction FBD...................... 33
Table 41 Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result X Direction PBD ..................... 34
Table 42 Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result X Direction PBD Continue ..... 35
Table 43 Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result Y Direction PBD ..................... 35
Table 44. Concrete Volume 5th Level ........................................................................................ 36
Table 45. Concrete Volume 4th – 1st Level ................................................................................. 36
Table 46. Bill of Materials Beams Structure ............................................................................. 37
Table 47. Rebar Quantities Concrete Beams ............................................................................ 37
Table 48. Bill of Materials Columns Structure .......................................................................... 37
Table 49. Rebar Quantities Concrete Columns ......................................................................... 37
Table 50. Labors Cost ................................................................................................................. 38
Table 51. Materials Cost ............................................................................................................ 38
Table 52. Reinforcement Using D-13 Rebar per 1 Kg ............................................................... 38
Table 53. Reinforcement Using D-13 Rebar per 1 Kg Continue ............................................... 39
Table 56. Reinforcement Using D-22 Rebar per 1 Kg Continue ............................................... 40
Table 57. Concrete Work Unit Price per m3 .............................................................................. 40
Table 58. Rebar Work Unit Price per Kg.................................................................................... 41
Table 59. Project Recapitulation ............................................................................................... 41
vi
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
General Information of structural design is as follows:

A. Building Purpose : School Building
B. Tall of Building : 20 Meters
C. Number of Floors : 5 Floors
D. Locations : Jakarta
E. Structure System : Special Moment Frame System
F. Floor Thickness :
1. Slab : 150 mm
2. Roof : 120 mm
G. Column Dimension : 550 X 550 mm
H. Beam Dimensions :
1. Primary (B1) : 500 X 700 mm
2. Primary (B1) : 450 X 650 mm
3. Secondary (B3) : 350 X 500 mm
4. Secondary (B4) : 250 X 450 mm
II. ANALYSIS METHOD
Analysis method of the planning is as follows:

A. Finite Element Method (FEM) with three-dimensional frame/portal structure modeling.
B. Earthquake analysis using dynamic response spectra analysis.
C. Earthquake analysis using static non-linier Performance Based Design (PBD) with FEMA
440 & ASCE 41 – 13 Standard.
D. Analysis program using the CSI ETABS & spColumn program.
III. REFERENCE
Reference of the planning is as follows:

A. SNI 1726 – 2019 : Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan
gedung dan non gedung.
B. SNI 1727 – 2013 : Beban minimum untuk perancangan bangunan gedung dan struktur
lain.
C. SNI 2847 – 2019 : Persyaratan beton structural untuk bangunan gedung.
D. FEMA 440 : Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures.
E. ASCE 7 – 10 : Minimum design load and associated criteria for building and other
structures.
F. Computer and Structures, Inc : CSI ETABS, CSI Detail
1
IV. MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS
Materials specifications of the planning is as follows:

A. Material : Reinforced Concrete
B. Concrete Strength :
1. Frame : K400 (f’c = 33,2 MPa)
2. Slab : K300 (f’c = 24,9 MPa)
C. Rebar Strength :
1. Longitudinal : Deformed Bar fy = 420 MPa
2. Stirrup : Plain Bar fy = 240 MPa
V. LOAD SPECIFICATIONS
Load specifications of the planning is as follows:

A. Dead Load (DL)
Dead load of building automatically calculated by ETABS program.
B. Super Imposed Dead Load (SIDL)
Super imposed dead load adapt in ASCE 7 – 10 as follows:
Table 1. Super Imposed Dead Load 1st – 4th Floors
No Description Volume Unit

1 Ceramic 1.1 kN/m2
2 Ducting MEP 0.19 kN/m2
3 Hanger 0.1 kN/m2
4 Plafond 0.05 kN/m2
Total 1.44 kN/m2
Table 2. Super Imposed Dead Load 5th Floors
No Description Volume Unit

1 Waterproofing Layer 0.05 Kg/m2
2 Ducting MEP 0.19 Kg/m2
3 Hanger 0.1 Kg/m2
4 Plafond 0.05 Kg/m2
Total 0.39 Kg/m2
C. Live Load (LL)

Live load adapt in SNI 1723 – 2013, as follows:
1. Slab sections : 4.79 kN/m2.
2. Roof sections : 1 kN/m2.
2
D. Earthquake Load (EQ)

Earthquake load specification is as follows:
1. Location : Kelapa Gading, North Jakarta
2. Type of Soil : Medium Soil
3. Risk Category : IV
4. Site Classification : SD
5. Earthquake Priority Factor (Ie) : 1,5
6. Bedrock Acceleration Period 0.2 s (Ss) : 0,656
7. Bedrock Acceleration Period 0.1 s (S1) : 0,290
8. Site Coefficient Factor Period 0.2 s (Fa) : 1,275
9. Site Coefficient Factor Period 0.1 s (Fv) : 1,820
Parameters summary of earthquake load is as follows:

1. Parameters of Acceleration Response at a Period of 2.0 s (Sms) : 0,84 g
2. Parameters of Acceleration Response at a Period of 1.0 s (Sm1) : 0,53 g
3. Acceleration Spectral Parameters at 0 s Period (SDS) : 0,56 g
4. Acceleration Spectral Parameters at 1 s Period (SD1) : 0,35 g
5. Structural Fundamental Vibration Period :
a. T0 : 0,13 s
b. TS : 0,63 s
c. TL : 20 s
Equations standard of earthquake load is as follows:

1. If the conditions T < T0
2. If the conditions T0 < T < TS

𝑆𝑎 = 𝑆𝐷𝑆
3. If the conditions TS < T < TL
4. If the conditions T > TL
3
Earthquake Spectra for Kelapa Gading, North Jakarta shown is as follows:
Chart 1. Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading
Earth Quake Respon Spectrum

0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 5 10 15 20 25
VI. LOAD COMBINATIONS
Load combinations of the planning is as follows:
1. Comb1 : 1,4DL + 1,4 SIDL

2. Comb2 : 1,2DL + 1,2DL + 1,6LL
3. Comb3 : 1,32DL + 1,32 SIDL + 1 LL + 1,3 EQX + 0,39 EQY
4. Comb4 : 1,32DL + 1,32 SIDL + 1 LL + 1,3 EQX – 0,39 EQY
5. Comb5 : 1,32DL + 1,32 SIDL + 1 LL – 1,3 EQX + 0,39 EQY
6. Comb6 : 1,32DL + 1,32 SIDL + 1 LL – 1,3 EQX – 0,39 EQY
7. Comb7 : 1,32DL + 1,32 SIDL + 1 LL + 1,3 EQY + 0,39 EQX
8. Comb8 : 1,32DL + 1,32 SIDL + 1 LL + 1,3 EQY – 0,39 EQX
9. Comb9 : 1,32DL + 1,32 SIDL + 1 LL – 1,3 EQY + 0,39 EQX
10. Comb10 : 1,32DL + 1,32 SIDL + 1 LL – 1,3 EQY – 0,39 EQX
11. Comb11 : 0,78DL + 0,78 SIDL + 1,3 EQX + 0,39 EQY
12. Comb12 : 0,78DL + 0,78 SIDL + 1,3 EQX – 0,39 EQY
13. Comb13 : 0,78DL + 0,78 SIDL – 1,3 EQX + 0,39 EQY
14. Comb14 : 0,78DL + 0,78 SIDL – 1,3 EQX – 0,39 EQY
15. Comb15 : 0,78DL + 0,78 SIDL + 1,3 EQY + 0,39 EQX
16. Comb16 : 0,78DL + 0,78 SIDL + 1,3 EQY – 0,39 EQX
17. Comb17 : 0,78DL + 0,78 SIDL – 1,3 EQY + 0,39 EQX
18. Comb18 : 0,78DL + 0,78 SIDL – 1,3 EQY – 0,39 EQX
4
VII. CALCULATION METHOD
Calculating method of structure is as follows of the chart:
Chart 2. Calculation Method of Force Based Design
Preliminary
Design
Earthquake
Calculation
(FBD)
Control
Design
Structure
Rebar
Analysis
Performance
Analysis
Chart 3. Calculation Method of Performance Based Design
Preliminary
Design
Earthquake
Calculation
(PBD)
Control
Design
Structure
Rebar
Analysis
Pushover
Analysis
5
VIII. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Preliminary design of structure is as follows:

1. Beam
Preliminary of beam section determined by SNI 2847 – 2019 table 7.3.11 that the height
of beam section is under l/20, in this case the beam arrangement using l/12 for primary
beam and l/16 for secondary beam.
2. Slab
Preliminary of slab section determined by SNI 2847 – 2019 table 8.3.1.2 that the
minimum thickness of slab section are 125 mm, which this case the slab arrangement
using 150 mm and 125 mm for the roof
3. Column
Preliminary of column section calculated by using ETABS program, which the column
arrangement based on ETABS calculation is 500 X 500 mm.
IX. ANALYSIS OF THE BUILDING PERFORMACED BASED DESIGN (PBD)
Analysis of the building will be describe as follows:
1. MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE BUILDING

Model of the structure building is planning in ETABS as shown:
Figure 1. Model Design of the Structure Building
6
2. MASS OF THE STRUCTURE BUILDING

Mass of the structure building calculated by two methods, by manual and by ETABS
program as follows:
Table 3. Manual Mass Calculations Summary
DL LL DL + 0.25 LL
Level
(kN) (kN) (kN)
5 10619.52 2700.64 11294.68
4 12766.4 2700.64 13441.56
3 12766.4 2700.64 13441.56
2 12766.4 2700.64 13441.56
1 11726.4 1152 12014.4
Table 4. ETABS Program Mass Calculations Summary
Mass Mass
Level
(kg) (kN)
5 1050345.2 10503.452
4 1650026.84 16500.268
3 1650026.84 16500.268
2 1650026.84 16500.268
1 1650026.84 16500.268
Table 5. Manual Mass Vs ETABS Mass
Mass ETABS Mass Manual Deficit

Level
(kN) (kN) (%)
5 10503.452 11294.68 7%
4 16500.268 13441.56 -23%
3 16500.268 13441.56 -23%
2 16500.268 13441.56 -23%
1 16500.268 12014.4 -37%
Total 76504.526 63633.76 -20%
*ETABS Mass calculations will use as calculations since mass is the bigger
7
3. STRUCTURE ARRANGEMENT
Structure arrangement of the planning calculated by direct displacement based design,
which is as follows by the table as shown:
Table 6. Parameter of Structure Arrangement
Height Mass Δi
Level δi ωθ miΔi miΔi2 miΔiHi
(m) (Ton) (m)
5 20 1050.35 1 1.00 0.32 331.69 104.74 6633.76
4 16 1650.03 0.85 1.00 0.27 444.64 119.82 7114.22
3 12 1650.03 0.68 1.00 0.21 354.32 76.09 4251.86
2 8 1650.03 0.48 1.00 0.15 250.11 37.91 2000.87
1 4 1650.03 0.25 1.00 0.08 132.00 10.56 528.01
0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0
Total 60 7650 1512.76 349.12 20528.72
A. Structure Displacement Arrangement

Displacement arrangement of the structure calculated by equation as follows:
𝑚𝑖 ∆2𝑖
𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐴𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 (∆𝑑 ) = = 0,231 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
𝑚𝑖 ∆𝑖
B. Structure Effective Height
Effective height of the structure calculated by equation as follows:
𝑚𝑖 ∆𝑖 𝐻𝑖
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐻𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 (𝐻𝑒 ) = = 13,57 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
𝑚𝑖 ∆𝑖
C. Structure Effective Mass
Effective Mass of the structure calculated by equation as follows:
𝑚𝑖 ∆𝑖
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 (𝑀𝑒 ) = = 6554,90 𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠
∆𝑑
4. YIELD DRIFT STRUCTURE

Yield drift structure of the planning calculated which is as follows by the table as shown:
Table 7. Parameter of Yield Drift X Direction
Beam Lb Hb θy Σn X θy n
2.9 0.6 0.005075 0.0609 12
B2
4.9 0.6 0.008575 0.2744 32
0.8 0.4 0.0021 0.0252 12
B4
2.15 0.4 0.005644 0.13545 24
Total 0.49595 80
8
A. Structure Yield Displacement

Yield displacement of the structure calculated by equation as follows:
∑ 𝑛 × 𝜃𝑦
𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 (∆𝑦 ) = ( ) × 𝐻𝐸 = 0,0841 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
∑𝑛
B. Structure Ductility
Structure ductility calculated by equation as follows:
∆𝑦
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝐷𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 (𝜇𝐹 ) = = 2,743 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
∆𝑑
C. Effective Damping
Effective damping of the structure calculated by equation as follows:
𝜇𝐹 − 1
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐷𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 (𝜁𝐹 ) = 0,05 + 0,577 ( ) = 0,1668 ≈ 16,68%
𝜇𝐹 𝜋
Table 8. Parameter of Yield Drift Y Direction
Beam Lb Hb θy Σn X θy n
6.9 0.7 0.01035 0.2277 22
B1
2.9 0.7 0.00435 0.0522 12
7.25 0.5 0.015225 0.2436 16
B3 3.25 0.5 0.006825 0.0819 12
3 0.5 0.0063 0.0693 11
Total 0.6747 73
A. Structure Yield Displacement

Yield displacement of the structure calculated by equation as follows:
∑ 𝑛 × 𝜃𝑦
𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 (∆𝑦 ) = ( ) × 𝐻𝐸 = 0,125 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
∑𝑛
B. Structure Ductility
Structure ductility calculated by equation as follows:
∆𝑦
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝐷𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 (𝜇𝐹 ) = = 1,840 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
∆𝑑
C. Effective Damping
Effective damping of the structure calculated by equation as follows:
𝜇𝐹 − 1
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐷𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 (𝜁𝐹 ) = 0,05 + 0,577 ( ) = 0,1339 ≈ 13,39%
𝜇𝐹 𝜋
9
5. EFFECTIVE PERIOD
Effective period of the structure calculated based in spectral displacement (ADRS) as
follows:
Chart 4. ADRS Vs Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading X Direction
Spektral Displacement ADRS

RS Jakut Redaman 5% Redaman 16.68%
1.8
1.6
Spectral Displacement
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Periode
Based on Chart 4, the effective period (Teff) value is 4,31 sec.
Chart 5. ADRS Vs Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading Y Direction
Spektral Displacement ADRS

RS Jakut Redaman 5% Redaman 16.68%
1.8
1.6
Spectral Displacement
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Periode
Based on Chart 5, the effective period (Teff) value is 3,91 sec.
10
6. EFFECTIVE STIFFNESS
 Effective stiffness of the structure x direction calculated by equation as follows:
4 × 𝜋 2 × 𝑚𝑒
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 (𝐾𝑒 ) = = 13916,52 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑒2
 Effective stiffness of the structure y direction calculated by equation as follows:
4 × 𝜋 2 × 𝑚𝑒
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑒 = (𝐾 ) = 16909,54 𝑘𝑁/𝑚
𝑇𝑒2
7. EARTHQUAKE FORCE DESIGN

 X Direction
Earthquake force design on first yield calculated by equation as follows:
𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 (𝑉𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒 ) = 𝐾𝑒 × ∆𝑑 = 3211,70 𝑘𝑁
The distribution of earthquake design for each level of structure calculated by
equation as follows:
𝑚𝑖 ∆ 𝑖
𝐹𝑖 = 𝐹𝑡 + 0,9 𝑉𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒
∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∆ 𝑖
Which:
a. Roof Section
𝐹𝑡 = 0,1𝑉𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒
b. Floor Section
𝐹𝑡 = 0
Table 9. Earthquake Force Design per Level X Direction
Tinggi Mass Δi VBase Fi

Level miΔi
(m) (Ton) (m) (kN) (kN)
5 20 1050.35 0.32 331.69 3211.70 954.95
4 16 1650.03 0.27 444.64 3211.70 849.60
3 12 1650.03 0.21 354.32 3211.70 677.03
2 8 1650.03 0.15 250.11 3211.70 477.90
1 4 1650.03 0.08 132.00 3211.70 252.23
0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3211.70 0
Total 60 7650.45 1512.76 3211.70
 Y Direction
Earthquake force design on first yield calculated by equation as follows:
𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 (𝑉𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒 ) = 𝐾𝑒 × ∆𝑑 = 3902,44 𝑘𝑁
The distribution of earthquake design for each level of structure calculated by
equation as follows:
𝑚𝑖 ∆ 𝑖
𝐹𝑖 = 𝐹𝑡 + 0,9 𝑉𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒
∑ 𝑚𝑖 ∆ 𝑖
11
Which:
c. Roof Section
𝐹𝑡 = 0,1𝑉𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒
d. Floor Section
𝐹𝑡 = 0
Table 10. Earthquake Force Design per Level Y Direction
Tinggi Mass Δi VBase Fi

Level miΔi
(m) (Ton) (m) (kN) (kN)
5 20 1050.35 0.32 331.69 3902.44 1160.33
4 16 1650.03 0.27 444.64 3902.44 1032.32
3 12 1650.03 0.21 354.32 3902.44 822.63
2 8 1650.03 0.15 250.11 3902.44 580.68
1 4 1650.03 0.08 132.00 3902.44 306.47
0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 3902.44 0
Total 60 7650.45 1512.76 3902.44
X. ANALYSIS OF THE BUILDING FORCE BASED DESIGN (FBD)
Analysis of the building will be describe as follows:
1. STATIC EARTHQUAKE ARRANGEMENT

Calculation of static earthquake data are as follows:
a. Scale Factor Respond Spectrum : 1839,375
b. Coefficient R :8
c. Coefficient Ω0 :3
d. Coefficient Cd : 5,5
e. Coefficient Ie : 1,5
f. Coefficient Ct : 0,0466
g. Coefficient Hn x : 0,9
h. Height of Structure (Hsx) : 20 metes
i. Approximate Period Parameter Value : 0,691 (Lower Limit)
j. Coefficient Cu : 1,4
k. Coefficient Ta : 0,691
l. Approximate Period Parameter Value : 0,967 (Upper Limit)
m. Approximate Period Parameter Value : 1,061 (ETABS)
n. Design Period Value : 0,967
o. Calculation of Cs :
 Csmax : 0,105
 Csmin : 0,037
 Cs : 0,068
p. Calculation of K : 1,234
12
q. Weight of Building (Cumulative) : 73587,37 kN

r. Base Shear (V) : 𝑉 = 𝐶𝑠 × 𝑊 = 5020,44 𝑘𝑁
Table 11. Equivalent Static Earthquake Force Distribution Each Floor
Height Mass Wihik Fx = Fy Vx = Vy

Level K Cv
(m) (kN) (kN.m) (kN) (kN)
Story10 20 10503.45 422837.5 0.303 1521.799 1521.799
Story8 16 16500.27 504420.1 0.362 1815.416 3337.214
Story6 12 16500.27 1.234 353735.4 0.254 1273.099 4610.313
Story4 8 16500.27 214519.6 0.154 772.059 5382.373
Story2 4 16500.27 91230.85 0.065 328.341 5710.714
Total 76504.5256 1586743 1.137 5710.714 20562.413
2. DYNAMIC EARTHQUAKE ARRANGEMENT

Dynamic earthquake based on ETABS is as follows:
Table 12. Equivalent Dynamic Shear Earthquake Force Distribution Each Floor
Dynamic Shear Force

Elevation
Story X-Dir Y-Dir
m kN kN
Story10 20 908.928 2577.365
Story8 16 1881.452 6058.486
Story6 12 2584.354 8815.490
Story4 8 3116.413 10739.349
Story2 4 3429.144 11665.701
(𝐸𝑞 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐 ×85%)

 Scale Factor X direction = = 1,423
𝐸𝑞 𝐷𝑦𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑐
(𝐸𝑞 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐 ×85%)
 Scale Factor Y direction = = 0,502
𝐸𝑞 𝐷𝑦𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑐
Table 13. Equivalent Dynamic Earthquake Force Distribution Each Floor

Scale Factor Base Shear Force Design
Elevation
Story X-Dir Y-Dir X-Dir Y-Dir
X-Dir Y-Dir
m kN kN kN kN
Story10 20 1293.529 1293.529 1293.529 1293.529
Story8 16 2677.565 3040.635 1384.036 1747.106
Story6 12 1.423 0.502 3677.892 4424.321 1000.327 1383.686
Story4 8 4435.084 5389.867 757.193 965.547
Story2 4 4880.143 5854.786 445.059 464.918
13
XI. CONTROL DESIGN PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN (PBD)

The design control of the structure calculated based on SNI 1926 – 2019, there are 14-control
design in the building planning as follows:
1. MODAL LOAD PARTICIPATION RATIOS

Modal load participation ratios determination should up to 90 % at static & dynamic
directions, the modal load participation ratio of the structure is as follows:
Table 14. Modal Load Participation Ratios PBD
Static Dynamic
Case Item Type Item
% %
Modal Acceleration UX 99.99 99.5
Modal Acceleration UY 99.99 99.51
Modal Acceleration UZ 0 0
This case the structure is eligible and safe.
2. MODAL MASS PARTICIPATING RATIOS

Modal Participating mass ratios determination should up to 50% at mode 1, mode 2 &
mode 3, at mode 1 & mode 2 checked at UX & UY directions and at mode 3 checked at
RZ directions, however Sum UX & Sum UY should up to 90% value, modal participating
mass ratio of the structure is as follows:
Table 15. Modal Mass Participation Ratios
Period Sum Sum Sum Sum Sum

Case Mode UX UY RX RY RZ
sec UX UY RX RY RZ
Modal 1 1.033 0.84 0 0.8354 0 0 0.17 0 0 0.1723 0.0003
Modal 2 1.01 0 0.84 0.8354 0.8366 0.17 0 0 0.1717 0.1723 0.0003
Modal 3 0.932 0 0 0.8357 0.8366 0 0 0.84 0.1717 0.1724 0.8369
Modal 4 0.328 0.1 0 0.9396 0.8366 0 0.66 0 0.1717 0.8323 0.837
Modal 5 0.322 0 0.1 0.9396 0.9413 0.66 0 0 0.8356 0.8323 0.837
Modal 6 0.297 0 0 0.9397 0.9413 0 0 0.1 0.8356 0.8326 0.9411
Modal 7 0.184 0.04 0 0.9779 0.9413 0 0.08 0 0.8356 0.9087 0.9412
Modal 8 0.181 0 0.04 0.9779 0.9785 0.07 0 0 0.9104 0.9087 0.9412
Modal 9 0.167 0 0 0.9779 0.9785 0 0 0.04 0.9104 0.9088 0.9785
Modal 10 0.125 0.02 0 0.995 0.9785 0 0.08 0 0.9104 0.9856 0.9785
Modal 11 0.124 0 0.02 0.995 0.9951 0.08 0 0 0.9858 0.9856 0.9785
Modal 12 0.115 0 0 0.995 0.9951 0 0 0.02 0.9858 0.9857 0.9951
14
3. HORIZONTAL IRREGULARITY
There are 5 type of horizontal irregularity that determined by SNI 1926 – 2019 Table 13,
the structure should be non-irregularity on horizontal & vertical directions since the
structure designed by nonlinear static approach method, control of horizontal
irregularity as follows:
A. Torsional & Extreme Torsional Irregularity (1a & 1b)

Torsional irregularity is defined to exist where the maximum story drift, computed
including accidental torsion with Ax = 1.0, at one end of the structure transverse
to an axis is more than 1,2 & 1,6 times the average of the story drifts at the two
ends of the structure. Torsional irregularity requirements in the reference sections
apply only to structures in which the diaphragms are rigid or semi rigid. Horizontal
irregularity 1a & 1b as follows:
Table 16. PBD Displacement Maximum / Average Displacement X Direction
Load Maximum Average

Story Direction Ratio
Case/Combo mm mm
Story10 EQX PBD X 18.263 17.921 1.019
Story8 EQX PBD X 16.33 16.028 1.019
Story6 EQX PBD X 13.036 12.799 1.019
Story4 EQX PBD X 8.609 8.453 1.018
Story2 EQX PBD X 3.604 3.539 1.018
Table 17. PBD Displacement Maximum / Average Displacement Y Direction

Case/Combo mm mm
Story10 EQY PBD Y 25.232 20.817 1.200
Story8 EQY PBD Y 22.533 18.587 1.200
Story6 EQY PBD Y 17.983 14.831 1.200
Story4 EQY PBD Y 11.906 9.819 1.200
Story2 EQY PBD Y 5.026 4.145 1.200
The table describe that ratio of displacement maximum / average displacement

on two directions are under 1,2 & 1,6 value, in This case the structure is eligible
and safe.
B. Reentrant Corner Irregularity (2)

Reentrant corner irregularity is defined to exist where both plan projections of the
structure beyond a reentrant corner are greater than 15% of the plan dimension
of the structure in the given direction. In this case, the structure does not have
15
reentrant corner, the corner of the building are 90° degree. This case the structure
is eligible and safe.
C. Diaphragm Discontinuity Irregularity (3)

Diaphragm discontinuity irregularity is defined to exist where there is a diaphragm
with an abrupt discontinuity or variation in stiffness, including one having a cutout
or open area greater than 50% of the gross enclosed diaphragm area, or a change
in effective diaphragm stiffness of more than 50% from one story to the next. In
this case, the structure does not have opening section more than 50 %, the
structure building full of slab structure and stairs structure. This case the structure
D. Out-of-Plane Offset Irregularity (4)

Out-of-plane offset irregularity is defined to exist where there is a discontinuity in
a lateral force-resistance path, such as an out-of-plane offset of at least one of the
vertical elements. In this case, the structure element connected to others level of
building. This case the structure is eligible and safe.
E. Non Parallel System Irregularity (5)

Nonparallel system irregularity is defined to exist where vertical lateral force-
resisting elements are not parallel to the major orthogonal axes of the seismic
force-resisting system. In this case, the structure element are parallel. This case
the structure is eligible and safe.
4. VERTICAL IRREGULARITY
There are 5 type of vertical irregularity that determined by SNI 1926 – 2019 Table 14,
A. Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity (1a & 1b)

Stiffness-soft story irregularity is defined to exist where there is a story in which
the lateral stiffness is less than 70% of that in the story above or less than 80% of
the average stiffness of the three stories above (1a), the lateral stiffness is less
than 60% of that in the story above or less than 70% of the average stiffness of the
three stories above (1b). Vertical irregularity 1a & 1b as follows:
16
Table 18. PBD Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity
X Direction Y Direction
Story Stiffness Stiffness
Check Check
kN/m kN/m
Story10 503517.51 519641.58
Story8 512718.37 OK 527734.95 OK
Story6 548372.02 OK 573331.53 OK
Story4 617388.35 OK 647441.96 OK
Story2 907584.85 V.1a 942091.59 V.1a
This case the structure is Soft Irregularity
B. Weight (Mass) Irregularity (2)

Weight (mass) irregularity is defined to exist where the effective mass of any story
is more than 150% of the effective mass of an adjacent story. A roof that is lighter
than the floor below need not be considered. Vertical irregularity 2 as follows:
Table 19. PBD Mass Summary of Structure
UX UY
Story
kg kg
Story10 1066189.15 1066189.2
Story8 1690500.19 1690500.2
Story6 1690500.19 1690500.2
Story4 1690500.19 1690500.2
Story2 1690500.19 1690500.2
Base 71070.14 71070.14
Table 20. Weight (Mass) Irregularity
Massa
Story Cek
kg
Story10 1066189.15 OK
Story8 1690500.19 OK
Story6 1690500.19 OK
Story4 1690500.19 OK
Story2 1690500.19 V.2
Base 71070.14 OK
Since description of exception of roof & base structure need not to considered,
this case the structure is eligible and safe.
17
C. Vertical Geometric Irregularity (3)

Vertical geometric irregularity defined to exist where the horizontal dimension of
the seismic force-resisting system in any story is more than 130% of that in an
adjacent story. In this case, horizontal dimension of structure (column) have a
same dimension. This case the structure is eligible and safe.
D. In-Plane Discontinuity in Vertical Lateral Force-Resisting Element Irregularity (4)

In-plane discontinuity in vertical lateral force-resisting elements irregularity
defined to exist where there is an in-plane offset of a vertical seismic force-
resisting element resulting in overturning demands on a supporting beam,
column, truss, or slab. Structure does not an offset of a vertical element. This case
E. Discontinuity in Lateral Strength–Extreme Weak Story Irregularity (5)

Discontinuity in lateral strength–extreme weak story irregularity defined to exist
where the story lateral strength is less than 65% of that in the story above. The
story strength is the total strength of all seismic-resisting elements sharing the
story shear for the direction under consideration. Vertical irregularity 5 as follows:
Table 21. Discontinuity in Lateral Strength–Extreme Weak Story Irregularity
Lantai Story Force Story Force
Check Check
kN kN
Story10 954.95 1160.33
Story8 1804.55 OK 2192.65 OK
Story7 2481.58 OK 3015.28 OK
Story6 2959.48 OK 3595.96 OK
Story5 3211.71 OK 3902.43 OK
Since description of table 21 are eligible for each stories, this case the structure is
eligible and safe. Based on horizontal & vertical irregularity control, the structure
is a regularity building and the method of earthquake analysis nonlinear static is
eligible.
5. STORY DRIFT
For seismic force-resisting systems comprised solely of moment frames in structures
assigned to Seismic Design Categories D, E, or F, the design story drift (Δ) shall not exceed
Δa/ρ for any story. The allowable story drift based on SNI 1726 – 2019 Table 22 as
follows:
Coefficient of drag for breaking waves (Cd) = 5,5

Earthquake Priority Factor (Ie) = 1,5
18
0,025ℎ𝑠𝑥
𝐴𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝐷𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑡 (∆𝑎 ) = = 40 𝑚𝑚
𝜌
𝐶𝑑 × 𝐼𝑒
𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝐷𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑡 δ𝑖 =
𝜌
Table 22. Story Drift Calculation PBD
Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir δx δy Δx Δy ΔMax

Story
(m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
5 20 17.921 20.817 65.71 76.33 6.97 8.18 40
4 16 16.019 18.587 58.74 68.15 11.83 13.77 40
3 12 12.792 14.831 46.90 54.38 15.93 18.38 40
2 8 8.448 9.819 30.98 36.00 18.01 20.80 40
1 4 3.537 4.145 12.97 15.20 12.97 15.20 40
0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40
Chart 6. Story Drift Curve PBD
Story Drift
Δx Δy Δizin
3
Level
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Displacement
In this case, the structure story drift value is not higher than story drift limit, this
case the structure is eligible and safe.
6. P – DELTA EFFECT
P-delta effects on story shears and moments, the resulting member forces and
moments, and the story drifts induced by these effects are not required to be
considered where the stability coefficient (θ) as determined by the following
equation is equal to or less than 0.10:
19
𝑃𝑥 ∆𝐼𝑒
𝑃 − 𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑡𝑎 (𝜃) =
𝑉𝑥 ℎ𝑠𝑥 𝐶𝑑
0,5
𝑃 − 𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑡𝑎 (𝜃𝑀𝑎𝑥 ) = ≤ 0,25
𝛽𝐶𝑑
P – Delta effect of the structure is as follows:
Table 23. P – Delta Calculation X Direction PBD
Height Δx P Vx
Story θ θmax
(m) (mm) (kN) (kN)
5 20 6.97 9816.528 954.95 0.0049 0.090909
4 16 11.83 26532.77 1804.55 0.0119 0.090909
3 12 15.93 43249.01 2481.58 0.0189 0.090909
2 8 18.01 59965.25 2959.48 0.0249 0.090909
1 4 12.97 76681.49 3211.71 0.0211 0.090909
Table 24. P – Delta Calculation Y Direction PBD
Height Δy P Vy
Story θ θmax
(m) (mm) (kN) (kN)
5 20 8.18 9816.528 1160.33 0.0047 0.090909
4 16 13.77 26532.77 2192.65 0.0114 0.090909
3 12 18.38 43249.01 3015.28 0.0180 0.090909
2 8 20.80 59965.25 3595.96 0.0237 0.090909
1 4 15.20 76681.49 3902.43 0.0204 0.090909
Chart 7. P – Delta Curve PBD
Δy Δx θmax
3
Level
0
0.0000 0.0100 0.0200 0.0300 0.0400 0.0500 0.0600 0.0700 0.0800 0.0900 0.1000
θ
20
P – Delta effect of the structure still controllable by design structure, since the P –
Delta effect of the structure below of the P – Delta maximum. This case the
structure is eligible and safe.
The summary of control design is the structure of building planning is eligible &
safe to continue for planning.
XII. CONTROL DESIGN FORCE BASED DESIGN (FBD)

The design control of the structure calculated based on SNI 1926 – 2019, there are 14-control
design in the building planning as follows:
1. MODAL LOAD PARTICIPATION RATIOS

Modal load participation ratios determination should up to 90 % at static & dynamic
directions, the modal load participation ratio of the structure is as follows:
Table 25. Modal Load Participation Ratios FBD
Static Dynamic
Case Item Type Item
% %
Modal Acceleration UX 99.99 99.42
Modal Acceleration UY 99.99 99.47
Modal Acceleration UZ 0 0
2. MODAL MASS PARTICIPATING RATIOS

Modal Participating mass ratios determination should up to 50% at mode 1, mode 2 &
mode 3, at mode 1 & mode 2 checked at UX & UY directions and at mode 3 checked at
RZ directions, however Sum UX & Sum UY should up to 90% value, modal participating
mass ratio of the structure is as follows:
Table 26. Modal Mass Participation Ratios FBD
Period Sum Sum Sum Sum Sum

Case Mode UX UY RX RY RZ
sec UX UY RX RY RZ
Modal 1 1.061 0.83 0 0.8336 0 0 0.17 0 0 0.1746 0.0002
Modal 2 1.007 0 0.84 0.8336 0.8365 0.17 0 0 0.172 0.1746 0.0002
Modal 3 0.932 0 0 0.8337 0.8365 0 0 0.84 0.172 0.1747 0.8366
Modal 4 0.335 0.1 0 0.9382 0.8365 0 0.65 0 0.172 0.8292 0.8366
21
Table 27. Modal Mass Participation Ratios FBD Continue
Sum Sum Sum Sum Sum

Case Mode Period UX UY RX RY RZ
UX UY RX RY RZ
Modal 5 0.321 0 0.1 0.9382 0.9412 0.66 0 0 0.8355 0.8292 0.8366

Modal 6 0.297 0 0 0.9383 0.9412 0 0 0.1 0.8355 0.8294 0.9409
Modal 7 0.186 0.04 0 0.9772 0.9412 0 0.08 0 0.8355 0.907 0.9409
Modal 8 0.181 0 0.04 0.9772 0.9785 0.07 0 0 0.9103 0.907 0.9409
Modal 9 0.167 0 0 0.9772 0.9785 0 0 0.04 0.9103 0.9071 0.9784
Modal 10 0.126 0.02 0 0.9948 0.9785 0 0.08 0 0.9103 0.9849 0.9784
Modal 11 0.124 0 0.02 0.9948 0.995 0.08 0 0 0.9858 0.9849 0.9784
Modal 12 0.114 0 0 0.9948 0.995 0 0 0.02 0.9858 0.985 0.995
3. HORIZONTAL IRREGULARITY
There are 5 type of horizontal irregularity that determined by SNI 1926 – 2019 Table 13,
A. Torsional & Extreme Torsional Irregularity (1a & 1b)

Torsional irregularity is defined to exist where the maximum story drift, computed
including accidental torsion with Ax = 1.0, at one end of the structure transverse
to an axis is more than 1,2 & 1,6 times the average of the story drifts at the two
ends of the structure. Torsional irregularity requirements in the reference sections
apply only to structures in which the diaphragms are rigid or semi rigid. Horizontal
irregularity 1a & 1b as follows:
Table 28. FBD Displacement Maximum / Average Displacement X Direction

Case/Combo mm mm
Story10 EQX Desain X 28.926 28.418 1.018
22
Table 29. FBD Displacement Maximum / Average Displacement Y Direction

Case/Combo mm mm
Story10 EQY Desain Y 36.548 30.115 1.200
The table describe that ratio of displacement maximum / average displacement

on two directions are under 1,2 & 1,6 value, in This case the structure is eligible
and safe.
B. Reentrant Corner Irregularity (2)

Reentrant corner irregularity is defined to exist where both plan projections of the
structure beyond a reentrant corner are greater than 15% of the plan dimension
of the structure in the given direction. In this case, the structure does not have
reentrant corner, the corner of the building are 90° degree. This case the structure
C. Diaphragm Discontinuity Irregularity (3)

Diaphragm discontinuity irregularity is defined to exist where there is a diaphragm
with an abrupt discontinuity or variation in stiffness, including one having a cutout
or open area greater than 50% of the gross enclosed diaphragm area, or a change
in effective diaphragm stiffness of more than 50% from one story to the next. In
this case, the structure does not have opening section more than 50 %, the
structure building full of slab structure and stairs structure. This case the structure
D. Out-of-Plane Offset Irregularity (4)

Out-of-plane offset irregularity is defined to exist where there is a discontinuity in
a lateral force-resistance path, such as an out-of-plane offset of at least one of the
vertical elements. In this case, the structure element connected to others level of
building. This case the structure is eligible and safe.
E. Non Parallel System Irregularity (5)

Nonparallel system irregularity is defined to exist where vertical lateral force-
resisting elements are not parallel to the major orthogonal axes of the seismic
force-resisting system. In this case, the structure element are parallel. This case
23
4. VERTICAL IRREGULARITY
There are 5 type of vertical irregularity that determined by SNI 1926 – 2019 Table 14,
A. Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity (1a & 1b)

Stiffness-soft story irregularity is defined to exist where there is a story in which
the lateral stiffness is less than 70% of that in the story above or less than 80% of
the average stiffness of the three stories above (1a), the lateral stiffness is less
than 60% of that in the story above or less than 70% of the average stiffness of the
three stories above (1b). Vertical irregularity 1a & 1b as follows:
Table 30. FBD Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity
Story Stiffness Stiffness
Check Check
kN/m kN/m
Story10 446793.82 463338.63
Story8 479827.19 OK 514868.21 OK
Story6 509002.87 OK 568580.85 OK
Story4 577571.08 OK 646837.16 OK
Story2 866539.38 V.1a 939737.49 V.1a
This case the structure is Soft Irregularity
B. Weight (Mass) Irregularity (2)

Weight (mass) irregularity is defined to exist where the effective mass of any story
is more than 150% of the effective mass of an adjacent story. A roof that is lighter
than the floor below need not be considered. Vertical irregularity 2 as follows:
Table 31. FBD Mass Summary of Structure
UX UY
Story
kg kg
Story10 1066189.15 1066189.2
Story8 1690500.19 1690500.2
Story6 1690500.19 1690500.2
Story4 1690500.19 1690500.2
Story2 1690500.19 1690500.2
Base 71070.14 71070.14
24
Table 32. FBD Weight (Mass) Irregularity
Massa
Story Cek
kg
Story10 1066189.15 OK
Story8 1690500.19 OK
Story6 1690500.19 OK
Story4 1690500.19 OK
Story2 1690500.19 V.2
Base 71070.14 OK
Since description of exception of roof & base structure need not to considered,
this case the structure is eligible and safe.
C. Vertical Geometric Irregularity (3)

Vertical geometric irregularity defined to exist where the horizontal dimension of
the seismic force-resisting system in any story is more than 130% of that in an
adjacent story. In this case, horizontal dimension of structure (column) have a
same dimension. This case the structure is eligible and safe.
D. In-Plane Discontinuity in Vertical Lateral Force-Resisting Element Irregularity (4)

In-plane discontinuity in vertical lateral force-resisting elements irregularity
defined to exist where there is an in-plane offset of a vertical seismic force-
resisting element resulting in overturning demands on a supporting beam,
column, truss, or slab. Structure does not an offset of a vertical element. This case
E. Discontinuity in Lateral Strength–Extreme Weak Story Irregularity (5)

Discontinuity in lateral strength–extreme weak story irregularity defined to exist
where the story lateral strength is less than 65% of that in the story above. The
story strength is the total strength of all seismic-resisting elements sharing the
story shear for the direction under consideration. Vertical irregularity 5 as follows:
Table 33. FBD Discontinuity in Lateral Strength–Extreme Weak Story Irregularity
Level Force Force
Check Check
kN kN
Story10 1293.529 1293.529
Story8 2677.565 OK 3040.635 OK
Story7 3677.892 OK 4424.321 OK
Story6 4435.085 OK 5389.868 OK
25
Table 34. FBD Discontinuity in Lateral Strength–Extreme Weak Story Irregularity

Continue
Level Force Force
Check Check
kN kN
Story5 4880.144 OK 5854.786 OK
Since description of table 34 are eligible for each stories, this case the structure is
eligible and safe. Based on horizontal & vertical irregularity control, the structure
is a regularity building and the method of earthquake analysis nonlinear static is
eligible.
5. STORY DRIFT
For seismic force-resisting systems comprised solely of moment frames in structures
assigned to Seismic Design Categories D, E, or F, the design story drift (Δ) shall not exceed
Δa/ρ for any story. The allowable story drift based on SNI 1726 – 2019 Table 35 as
follows:
Coefficient of drag for breaking waves (Cd) = 5,5

Earthquake Priority Factor (Ie) = 1,5
0,025ℎ𝑠𝑥
𝐴𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝐷𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑡 (∆𝑎 ) = = 40 𝑚𝑚
𝜌
𝐶𝑑 × 𝐼𝑒
𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝐷𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑡 δ𝑖 =
𝜌
Table 35. FBD Story Drift Calculation
Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir δx δy Δx Δy ΔMax

Story
(m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
5 20 28.418 30.115 104.20 110.42 10.64 10.22 40
4 16 25.517 27.329 93.56 100.21 18.70 19.19 40
3 12 20.417 22.095 74.86 81.02 25.38 26.98 40
2 8 13.494 14.738 49.48 54.04 28.84 31.18 40
1 4 5.629 6.235 20.64 22.86 20.64 22.86 40
0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40
26
Chart 8. Story Drift Curve FBD
Story Drift
Δx Δy Δizin
3
Level
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Displacement
In this case, the structure story drift value is not higher than story drift limit, this
case the structure is eligible and safe.
6. P – DELTA EFFECT
P-delta effects on story shears and moments, the resulting member forces and
moments, and the story drifts induced by these effects are not required to be
considered where the stability coefficient (θ) as determined by the following
equation is equal to or less than 0.10:
𝑃𝑥 ∆𝐼𝑒
𝑃 − 𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑡𝑎 (𝜃) =
𝑉𝑥 ℎ𝑠𝑥 𝐶𝑑
0,5
𝑃 − 𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑡𝑎 (𝜃𝑀𝑎𝑥 ) = ≤ 0,25
𝛽𝐶𝑑
P – Delta effect of the structure is as follows:
Table 36. P – Delta Calculation X Direction FBD
Height Δx P Vx
Story θ θmax
(m) (mm) (kN) (kN)
5 20 10.64 9661.152 1293.529 0.0054 0.090909
4 16 18.70 26222.02 2677.565 0.0125 0.090909
3 12 25.38 42782.88 3677.892 0.0201 0.090909
2 8 28.84 59343.74 4435.084 0.0263 0.090909
1 4 20.64 75904.61 4880.143 0.0219 0.090909
27
Table 37. P – Delta Calculation Y Direction FBD
Height Δy P Vy
Story θ θmax
(m) (mm) (kN) (kN)
5 20 10.22 9661.152 1293.529 0.0052 0.090909
4 16 19.19 26222.02 3040.635 0.0113 0.090909
3 12 26.98 42782.88 4424.321 0.0178 0.090909
2 8 31.18 59343.74 5389.867 0.0234 0.090909
1 4 22.86 75904.61 5854.786 0.0202 0.090909
Chart 9. P – Delta Curve FBD
Δy Δx θmax
3
Level
0
0.0000 0.0100 0.0200 0.0300 0.0400 0.0500 0.0600 0.0700 0.0800 0.0900 0.1000
θ
P – Delta effect of the structure still controllable by design structure, since the P –
Delta effect of the structure below of the P – Delta maximum. This case the
The summary of control design is the structure of building planning is eligible &
safe to continue for planning.
XIII. STRUCTURE REBAR ANALYSIS PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN (PBD)
Structure rebar analysis will be describe in attachment. However, in this section will describe
the envelope moment, max axial force and structural design based on ETABS. Analyze of Column
section determined by using spColumn program with the load combination as shown in chapter VI.
28
Figure 2. Envelope Moment A – A PBD
Figure 3. Axial Forces of Building Structure PBD
29
Figure 4. Concrete Rebar Design Check PBD
XIV. STRUCTURE REBAR ANALYSIS FORCE BASED DESIGN (FBD)
Structure rebar analysis will be describe in attachment . However, in this section will describe
the envelope moment, max axial force and structural design based on ETABS. Analyze of Column
section determined by using spColumn program with the load combination as shown in chapter VI.
30
Figure 5. Envelope Moment A – A FBD
Figure 6. Axial Forces of Building Structure FBD
31
Figure 7. Concrete Rebar Design Check FBD
XV. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS BUILDING FORCE BASED DESIGN (FBD)
The purpose performance analysis of the structural building is to determine the structure
performance, since the structure is analyzing by force based design method, the performance of
structure building should be check. The structure drift after pushover analysis shown as follows:
Table 38. Monitored Displacement Performance Analysis Result X Direction FBD
Monitored Base
Step Displ Force A-IO IO-LS LS-CP >CP
mm kN
0 0 0 2654 0 0 0
1 33.846 7877.421 2654 0 0 0
2 74.95 16601.969 2654 0 0 0
3 116.975 21713.391 2598 54 2 0
4 141.404 24176.808 2579 64 7 4
5 141.408 24041.196 2578 65 7 4
32
Table 39. Monitored Displacement Performance Analysis Result X Direction FBD Continue
Monitored Base
Step Displ Force A-IO IO-LS LS-CP >CP
mm kN
6 161.23 25791.096 2542 91 11 10
7 161.234 25778.431 2542 91 11 10
8 234.821 32087.436 2397 197 10 50
9 274.821 34608.956 2299 270 24 61
10 294.821 36589.365 2254 284 47 69
11 314.821 36842.515 2233 250 57 114
12 374.821 41828.754 2182 229 83 160
13 400 43706.358 2155 250 61 188
Table 40. Monitored Displacement Performance Analysis Result Y Direction
Monitored Base
Step Displ Force A-IO IO-LS LS-CP >CP Total
mm kN
0 0 0 2654 0 0 0 2654
1 40 9730.922 2654 0 0 0 2654
2 53.372 12983.931 2654 0 0 0 2654
3 83.982 18890.075 2646 2 0 6 2654
4 134.556 23631.919 2564 62 2 26 2654
5 177.199 26759.581 2508 64 41 41 2654
6 177.203 25514.626 2504 60 43 47 2654
7 187.952 26300.627 2485 75 41 53 2654
8 187.956 25692.215 2485 73 40 56 2654
9 202.073 26637.235 2463 95 18 78 2654
10 202.077 25908.645 2461 97 12 84 2654
11 221.689 27088.529 2433 123 4 94 2654
12 221.693 26996.167 2433 123 4 94 2654
13 226.693 27863.877 2427 127 4 96 2654
14 266.693 30859.546 2382 130 30 112 2654
15 306.693 34386.914 2323 156 31 144 2654
16 346.693 37954.115 2271 184 43 156 2654
17 396.693 42883.825 2227 210 43 174 2654
18 400 43647.646 2218 205 48 183 2654
The result of performance design checked by using Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) by FEMA
440 & Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) by ASCE 41 – 13, summary of pushover analysis will
describe in attachment.
 Capacity Spectrum Method
Displacement Performance Point X Direction : 286,333 mm
33
Displacement Performance Point Y Direction : 202,073 mm

∆ 286,333
Performance Building X Direction :𝜃 = = = 0.014
𝐻𝑠𝑥 20000
∆ 202,073
Performance Building Y Direction :𝜃 = = = 0.010
𝐻𝑠𝑥 20000
Performance building on X direction is Damage Control (DO) & performance building on
Y direction is Immediate Occupancy (IO), Structure performance result have not
reached the new plan performance recommendation (Life Safety), however the design
performance result is higher the new plan performance design. This case the structure
 Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM)

Target Displacement X Direction : 217,63 mm
Target Displacement Y Direction : 206,53 mm
∆ 217,63
𝐻𝑠𝑥 20000
∆ 206,53
𝐻𝑠𝑥 20000
Performance building on X direction is Immediate Occupancy (IO) & performance
building on Y direction is Immediate Occupancy (IO), Structure performance result have
not reached the new plan performance recommendation (Life Safety), however the
design performance result is higher the new plan performance design. This case the
XVI. PUSHOVER ANALYSIS BUILDING PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN (PBD)
The purpose pushover analysis of the structural building is to determine the structure
performance, which the new building should be design at life safety condition with drift (θ) of
building is 0,02. The structure drift after pushover analysis shown as follows:
Table 41. Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result X Direction PBD
Monitored Base
mm kN
0 0 0 2654 0 0 0 2654
1 38.227 8897.022 2653 1 0 0 2654
2 79.298 16183.834 2652 1 0 1 2654
3 120.838 20362.886 2597 55 1 1 2654
4 164.809 23212.387 2514 137 1 2 2654
5 207.874 25785.872 2403 221 27 3 2654
6 248.745 27950.775 2317 284 40 13 2654
7 270.023 29004.827 2311 278 41 24 2654
8 270.023 28939.561 2311 278 41 24 2654
34
Table 42. Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result X Direction Continue
Monitored Base
mm kN
9 310.023 31119.844 2264 297 43 50 2654
10 320.023 31159.658 2261 284 51 58 2654
11 322.523 30100.249 2257 266 66 65 2654
12 362.523 34658.915 2246 256 69 83 2654
13 381.261 37128.681 2226 275 69 84 2654
14 400 38607.124 2200 292 73 89 2654
Table 43. Monitored Displacement Pushover Analysis Result Y Direction
Monitored Base
mm kN
0 0 0 2654 0 0 0 2654
1 36.127 8788.736 2654 0 0 0 2654
2 61.022 13885.729 2647 0 0 7 2654
3 106.379 18858.840 2578 54 0 22 2654
4 146.973 21858.300 2527 89 0 38 2654
5 209.196 25842.712 2462 110 16 66 2654
6 267.907 29046.184 2413 114 43 84 2654
7 307.907 31013.641 2364 145 47 98 2654
8 347.907 33163.253 2328 169 29 128 2654
9 347.911 31158.633 2309 185 27 133 2654
10 355.464 31711.433 2296 198 24 136 2654
The result of performance design checked by using Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) by FEMA
440 & Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) by ASCE 41 – 13, summary of pushover analysis will
describe in attachment.
 Capacity Spectrum Method
Displacement Performance Point X Direction : 252,65 mm
Displacement Performance Point Y Direction : 259,74 mm
∆ 252,65
𝐻𝑠𝑥 20000
∆ 259,74
𝐻𝑠𝑥 20000
Performance building on X direction is Damage Control (DO) & performance building on
Y direction is Damage Control (DO), Structure performance result have not reached the
new plan performance recommendation (Life Safety), however the design performance
result is higher the new plan performance design. This case the structure is eligible and
safe.
35
 Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM)

Target Displacement X Direction : 213,698 mm
Target Displacement Y Direction : 207,682 mm
∆ 213,698
𝐻𝑠𝑥 20000
∆ 207,682
𝐻𝑠𝑥 20000
Performance building on X direction is Immediate Occupancy (IO) & performance
building on Y direction is Immediate Occupancy (IO), Structure performance result have
not reached the new plan performance recommendation (Life Safety), however the
design performance result is higher the new plan performance design. This case the
XVII. STRUCTURE PROJECT VALUE
The structure project value calculated based on guidelines of project value determined by
using Permen PUPR No. 28 – 2016 : Pedoman analisis harga satuan pekerjaan and the cost of
materials determined by using Journal of Building Construction 37th Editions.
1. SLAB STRUCTURE
Slab structure consist of one roof structure and four-slab structure, for 4th – 1st level
structure are typical. The bill of materials and rebar quantities for each level as follows:
Table 44. Concrete Volume 5th Level
No Item Notation Quantity Unit

1 Slab Area A 1200 m2
2 Concrete Volume V 144 m3
3 Average Thickness T 120 mm
Table 45. Concrete Volume 4th – 1sh Level

1 Slab Area A 1152 m2
2 Concrete Volume V 691,2 m3
3 Average Thickness T 150 mm
36
2. BEAMS STRUCTURE
Summary bill of materials concrete beams is as follows:
Table 46. Bill of Materials Beams Structure

1 Total Volume V 943 m3
2 Total Rebar’s Weight W 151515 Kg
3 Rebar Ratio W/V 160,673 Kg/m3
Table 47. Rebar Quantities Concrete Beams
Bar Length Quantity

No
Size (m) (Kg)
1 22 24874 74123
2 16 22193 35065
3 13 40700 42328
3. COLUMNS STRUCTURE
Summary bill of materials concrete column is as follows:
Table 48. Bill of Materials Columns Structure

1 Total Volume V 290,4 m3
2 Total Rebar’s Weight W 55142 Kg
3 Rebar Ratio W/V 189,882 Kg/m3
Table 49. Rebar Quantities Concrete Columns
Bar Length Quantity

No
Size (m) (Kg)
1 13 8426 8763
2 22 15564 46379
37
4. UNIT RATE OF WORKS

Materials & labor cost determines by using Journal of Building Construction 37th Editions
as follows:
Table 50. Labors Cost
Price
No Description Unit
(Rp)
1 Workers OH/8 Hours IDR 135,500
2 Wood Worker OH/8 Hours IDR 155,800
3 Head of Wood Worker OH/8 Hours IDR 170,500
4 Iron Worker OH/8 Hours IDR 170,500
5 Head of Iron Worker OH/8 Hours IDR 170,500
6 Stone Worker OH/8 Hours IDR 155,800
7 Head of Stone Worker OH/8 Hours IDR 170,600
8 Foreman OH/8 Hours IDR 183,200
Table 51. Materials Cost
Price
No Description Unit
(Rp)
1 Ready Mix Concrete K300 OH/8 Hours IDR 1,220,000
2 Ready Mix Concrete K400 OH/8 Hours IDR 1,310,000
3 Long Boom 27 m Incl > 100 m 3 m3 IDR 58,000
4 KS Cilegon SNI 13 mm Rod IDR 118,000
7 Wire Kg IDR 15,000
Permen PUPR No. 28 – 2016 determines unit rate of works as follows:
Table 52. Reinforcement Using D-13 Rebar per 1 Kg
Unit Price Total

No Description Code Unit Coefficient
(Rp) (Rp)
A Labor
1 Workers L.01 OH 0.021 IDR 135,500 IDR 2,846
2 Iron Worker L.02 OH 0.014 IDR 170,500 IDR 2,387
3 Head of Iron Worker L.03 OH 0.0014 IDR 170,500 IDR -
4 Foreman L.04 OH 0.0021 IDR 183,200 IDR 385
Labor Unit Price IDR 5,617
38
Table 53. Reinforcement Using D-13 Rebar per 1 Kg Continue
Unit Price Total

(Rp) (Rp)
B Materials
1 KS Cilegon SNI 13 mm M.55.d Kg 1.05 IDR 9,833 IDR 10,325
Materials Unit Price IDR 10,325
C Tools
Tools Unit Price IDR -
D Total Unit Price IDR 15,942
E Overhead + Profil (15%) IDR 2,391
F Unit Price per m3 IDR 18,334
Unit Price Total

(Rp) (Rp)
A Labor
B Materials
C Tools
Unit Price Total

(Rp) (Rp)
A Labor
39
Table 56. Reinforcement Using D-22 Rebar per 1 Kg Continue
Unit Price Total

(Rp) (Rp)
B Materials
C Tools
5. PROJECT COST VALUE

Project cost value of the structure building is as follows:
A. Concrete Work Unit Price

Concrete Value per each structure show is as follows:
Table 57. Concrete Work Unit Price per m3
Structure Volume 1 Floor Volume Unit Price Total Price

Remarks Amount
Component 3
(m ) 3
(m ) (Rp) (Rp)
Floor Plate Slab 172.8 4 691.2 IDR 1,676,758 IDR 1,158,974,784
Roof Plat Roof 144 1 144 IDR 1,676,758 IDR 241,453,080
B1 84 5 420 IDR 1,782,328 IDR 748,577,550
B2 57.6 5 288 IDR 1,782,328 IDR 513,310,320
Beams
B3 35 5 175 IDR 1,782,328 IDR 311,907,313
B4 12 5 60 IDR 1,782,328 IDR 106,939,650
Column K1 58.08 5 290.4 IDR 1,782,328 IDR 517,587,906
Total K-300 Concrete 835.2 IDR 1,676,758 IDR 1,400,427,864
Total K-400 Concrete 2068.6 IDR 1,782,328 IDR 3,686,922,667
Total Bill of Quantity Concrete Work IDR 5,087,350,531
40
B. Rebar Work Unit Price

Concrete Value per each structure show is as follows:
Table 58. Rebar Work Unit Price per Kg
Rebar Volume per

Qty Per Total Volume
Structure Beam Total Price
Description Floor
Component Ø22 Ø16 Ø13 Ø22 Ø16 Ø13
(m) (m) (m) (Pcs) (m) (m) (m) (Rp)
B1 86 15 82 24 10349 1814 9893
B1' 48 8 35 12 5729 986 4161
B2 42 11 56 32 5040 1334 6686
B2' 31 8 30 12 3756 986 3616
Beam
B3 0 61 67 22 0 7358 8014
B3' 0 35 24 11 0 4154 2889
B4 0 27 26 48 0 3187 3096
B4' 0 20 20 18 0 2371 2344
Total Rebar Volume Beam 24874 22193 40700 IDR 4,638,386,026
Column K1 324 0 176 48 15564 0 8426
Total Rebar Volume Column 15564 0 8426 IDR 2,040,499,595
C. Project Recapitulation
Project cost value recapitulation of the structure building is as follows:
Table 59. Project Recapitulation
Unit Rate Total

No Descriptions Unit Qty
(Rp) (Rp)
1 Total Concrete Work K300 m3 835,2 IDR 1,676,758 IDR 1,400,427,864
2 Total Concrete Work K400 m3 2068.6 IDR 1,782,328 IDR 3,686,922,667
3 Total Rebar Work D-13 Kg 51090 IDR 18,334 IDR 936,666,387
4 Total Rebar Work D-16 Kg 35065 IDR 24,472 IDR 858,090,187
5 Total Rebar Work D-22 Kg 120503 IDR 40,471 IDR 4,876,867,823
Total IDR 11,758,974,928
41
ATTACHMENT 1
FACULTY BUILDING – STRUCTURE
LAYOUT ARRANGEMENT
SHOP DRAWING
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O REMARKS:
2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000
1. MATERIALS QUALITY :
A. CONCRETE
K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1
· SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
6 · COLUMN : F'c = 33,2 MPa
· BEAM : F'c = 33,2 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
4000
· U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22

· U24 (PLAIN) - D13
2. NOTATIONS:
5 · B1 (PRIMARY BEAM) : 500 X 700 mm
· B2 (PRIMARY BEAM) : 450 X 600 mm
· B3 (SECONDARY BEAM) : 350 X 550 mm
4000
3. CONSTRUCTION CALCULATED BASED

K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 ON INDONESIAN STANDARD (SNI)
4
REV DATE AMENDMENTS
4000
K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1
3
4000
2 FOR CONSTRUCTION
4000
PROJECT TITLE:
CAMPUS BUILDING OF
1 CIVIL ENGINEERING FACULTY
K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1
DRAWING TITLE:
STRUCTURE PLAN VIEW 1ST STORY (TYPICAL)
SCALE:200 STRUCTURE OF SCHOOL
BUILDING PLAN VIEW
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
OWNER
2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000
B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2
6
4000
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
ARCHITECT
B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4 B4
WISNU MAULANA
5
B1
JL. Kober No. 35B, RT4/RW4,

Pondok Cina, Beji, Depok
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
4000
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
CONSULTANT
4 WISNU MAULANA
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
4000
B1
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774

B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
CONTRACTOR:
3
4000
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
2
B1
DRAWN BY: DATE:

WISNU MAULANA JULY 14, 2021
4000
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
B3
CONTRACT NO
1
B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2
DRAWING NO 01 - SCH - I - 2021
REVISION:
STRUCTURE PLAN VIEW 1ST STORY (TYPICAL) SCALE: 200
SCALE:200
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:
2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000
+20.00 1. MATERIALS QUALITY :

ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF
+0.12 +0.12 +0.12 +0.12 +0.12 +0.12 +0.12 +0.12 +0.12 +0.12 +0.12 A. CONCRETE
· SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
· COLUMN : F'c = 33,2 MPa
B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2
· BEAM : F'c = 33,2 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 · U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22
· U24 (PLAIN) - D13
+16.00
SLAB SLAB SLAB SLAB SLAB SLAB SLAB SLAB SLAB SLAB SLAB
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 2. NOTATIONS:
B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 · B2 (PRIMARY BEAM) : 450 X 600 mm
K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1
+12.00 3. CONSTRUCTION CALCULATED BASED

+0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 ON INDONESIAN STANDARD (SNI)
B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 REV DATE AMENDMENTS
K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1
+8.00
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15
B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2
K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1
+4.00
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15
FOR CONSTRUCTION
B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2
K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 K1 PROJECT TITLE:
±0.00
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 +0.15 CAMPUS BUILDING OF
CIVIL ENGINEERING FACULTY
DRAWING TITLE:
FRONT STRUCTURE ELEMENT VIEW
SCALE:200
STRUCTURE ELEMENT
BUILDING PERSPECTIVE VIEW
1 2 3 4 5 6 OWNER
4000 4000 4000 4000 4000

+20.00
ROOF ROOF ROOF
+0.12 +0.12 +0.12
ARCHITECT
K1 K1 K1 K1
+16.00
SLAB SLAB SLAB WISNU MAULANA
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
K1 K1 K1 K1
CONSULTANT
+12.00
SLAB SLAB SLAB
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15
WISNU MAULANA
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
K1 K1 K1 K1
+8.00 CONTRACTOR:
SLAB SLAB SLAB
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15
K1 K1 K1 K1
+4.00
SLAB SLAB SLAB
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15 DRAWN BY: DATE:
K1 K1 K1 K1 CONTRACT NO
±0.00
SLAB SLAB SLAB
+0.15 +0.15 +0.15
REVISION:
SIDE STRUCTURE ELEMENT VIEW SCALE: 200

SCALE:200
ATTACHMENT 2
FACULTY BUILDING – ARCHITECTURE
LAYOUT ARRANGEMENT
SHOP DRAWING
2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000
A. CONCRETE
· SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
6 · COLUMN : F'c = 33,2 MPa
· BEAM : F'c = 33,2 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
4000
· U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22

· U24 (PLAIN) - D13
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
2. NOTATIONS:
5 · B1 (PRIMARY BEAM) : 500 X 700 mm
4000

ON INDONESIAN STANDARD (SNI)
4
REV DATE AMENDMENTS
4000
CORRIDOR CORRIDOR
FOR LADIES
TOILET
4000
ADDITIONAL ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
FOR STORAGE
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
FOR GENTLE
TOILET
2 FOR CONSTRUCTION
4000
PROJECT TITLE:
CAMPUS BUILDING OF
1 CIVIL ENGINEERING FACULTY
DRAWING TITLE:
ARCHITECTURE PLAN VIEW 2ND - 5TH STOREY
SCALE:200
ARCHITECTURE OF SCHOOL
BUILDING PLAN VIEW
OWNER
2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000
6
4000
ARCHITECT
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
WISNU MAULANA
5 JL. Kober No. 35B, RT4/RW4,
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
4000
CONSULTANT
4 WISNU MAULANA
4000
CORRIDOR CORRIDOR Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
CONTRACTOR:
3
FOR LADIES
TOILET
4000
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
CLASS ROOM
FOR GENTLE
CORRIDOR
TOILET
2 DRAWN BY: DATE:

4000
CONTRACT NO
1
REVISION:
ARCHITECTURE PLAN VIEW 1ST STORY
SCALE:200 SCALE: 200
SHOP DRAWING
2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000 2000
+20.00 A. CONCRETE
· SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
· BEAM : F'c = 33,2 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
· U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22
· U24 (PLAIN) - D13
+16.00
2. NOTATIONS:

+12.00 ON INDONESIAN STANDARD (SNI)
REV DATE AMENDMENTS
+8.00
+4.00
FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT TITLE:
±0.00
CAMPUS BUILDING OF
DRAWING TITLE:
ARCHITECTURE FRONT VIEW BUILDING
SCALE:200
BUILDING PERSPECTIVE VIEW
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 OWNER
4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000
+20.00 +20.00
ARCHITECT
+16.00 +16.00
WISNU MAULANA
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
+12.00 +12.00 CONSULTANT
WISNU MAULANA
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
+8.00 +8.00
CONTRACTOR:
+4.00 +4.00
DRAWN BY: DATE:

±0.00 ±0.00 CONTRACT NO
REVISION:
ARCHITECTURE LEFT SIDE VIEW ARCHITECTURE RIGHT SIDE VIEW
SCALE: 200
SCALE:200 SCALE:200
ATTACHMENT 3
BEAM B1 DETAILS
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:
COLUMN COLUMN 1. MATERIALS QUALITY :

A. CONCRETE
K1 K1 · SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
HINGES AREA NON HINGES AREA HINGES AREA · BEAM : F'c = 33,2 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
LONGITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT LONGITUDINAL · U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22
150
REINFORCEMENT 5Ø22 REINFORCEMENT · U24 (PLAIN) - D13
7Ø22 7Ø22 2. NOTATIONS:

700
REV DATE AMENDMENTS
HINGES AREA NON HINGES AREA HINGES AREA

TRANSVERSAL TRANSVERSAL REINFORCEMENT TRANSVERSAL
REINFORCEMENT Ø13 - 250 REINFORCEMENT
Ø13 - 140 Ø13 - 140
1120 5210 1120

7450 FOR CONSTRUCTION
8000
PROJECT TITLE:
CAMPUS BUILDING OF
B1 TRANSVERSAL REINFORCEMENT DETAIL CIVIL ENGINEERING FACULTY
SCALE:30
DRAWING TITLE:
BEAM 1 FBD SECTION

REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
OWNER
7Ø22 5Ø22 7Ø22

10
10
10
ARCHITECT
5
5
5
WISNU MAULANA
150
150
150

Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
CONSULTANT
700
700
700
WISNU MAULANA
2Ø16 2Ø16 2Ø16 JL. Kober No. 35B, RT4/RW4,
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
CONTRACTOR:
5Ø22 5Ø22 5Ø22
500 500 500 DRAWN BY:

WISNU MAULANA
DATE:
JULY 14, 2021
LEFT HINGES RINFORCEMENT NON HINGES RINFORCEMENT RIGHT HINGES RINFORCEMENT CONTRACT NO
SCALE:16 SCALE:16 SCALE:16
REVISION:
SCALE: -
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:

A. CONCRETE
K1 K1 · SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
150

700
REV DATE AMENDMENTS

Ø13 - 140 Ø13 - 140
1120 5210 1120

8000
PROJECT TITLE:
CAMPUS BUILDING OF
SCALE:30
DRAWING TITLE:
BEAM 1 PBD SECTION

OWNER
10
10
10
ARCHITECT
7Ø22 4Ø22 7Ø22
5
5
5
WISNU MAULANA
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
150
150
150
CONSULTANT
WISNU MAULANA
700
700
700
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
2Ø22 2Ø22 2Ø22
CONTRACTOR:
5Ø22 4Ø22 5Ø22

DRAWN BY: DATE:
500 500 500

CONTRACT NO
LEFT HINGES RINFORCEMENT NON HINGES RINFORCEMENT RIGHT HINGES RINFORCEMENT

SCALE:16 SCALE:16 SCALE:16 DRAWING NO 11 - SCH - I - 2021
REVISION:
SCALE: -
ATTACHMENT 4
BEAM B2 DETAILS
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:
A. CONCRETE
COLUMN COLUMN · SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
K1 K1 · BEAM : F'c = 33,2 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
HINGES AREA NON HINGES AREA HINGES AREA · U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22
· U24 (PLAIN) - D13
LONGITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT LONGITUDINAL
REINFORCEMENT 3Ø22 REINFORCEMENT
150
2. NOTATIONS:
5Ø22 5Ø22 · B2 (PRIMARY BEAM) : 450 X 600 mm
600
REV DATE AMENDMENTS

Ø13 - 140 Ø13 - 140
1120 3210 1120 FOR CONSTRUCTION

5450
6000 PROJECT TITLE:
CAMPUS BUILDING OF
B2 TRANSVERSAL REINFORCEMENT DETAIL
SCALE:30 DRAWING TITLE:
BEAM 2 FBD SECTION

OWNER
5Ø22 3Ø22 5Ø22
10
10
10
ARCHITECT
5
5
WISNU MAULANA
150
150
150

Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
600
600
600
CONSULTANT
2Ø16 2Ø16 2Ø16 WISNU MAULANA

Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
CONTRACTOR:
3Ø22 3Ø22 3Ø22
450 450 450

DRAWN BY: DATE:

SCALE:16 SCALE:16 SCALE:16 CONTRACT NO
REVISION:
SCALE: -
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:
K1 K1 A. CONCRETE
· SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
LONGITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT LONGITUDINAL B. STEEL REBAR
· U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22
REINFORCEMENT 3Ø22 REINFORCEMENT
150
· U24 (PLAIN) - D13
5Ø22 5Ø22
2. NOTATIONS:
600

HINGES AREA NON HINGES AREA HINGES AREA REV DATE AMENDMENTS

Ø13 - 140 Ø13 - 140
1120 3210 1120

6000
PROJECT TITLE:
B2 TRANSVERSAL REINFORCEMENT DETAIL CAMPUS BUILDING OF

SCALE:30
DRAWING TITLE:
BEAM 2 FBD SECTION

OWNER
10
10
10
ARCHITECT
4Ø22 3Ø22 4Ø22
5
5
WISNU MAULANA
150
150
150
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
CONSULTANT
600
600
600
WISNU MAULANA
2Ø16 2Ø16 2Ø16 Pondok Cina, Beji, Depok
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
CONTRACTOR:
4Ø22 3Ø22 4Ø22
450 450 450 DRAWN BY: DATE:

LEFT HINGES RINFORCEMENT NON HINGES RINFORCEMENT RIGHT HINGES RINFORCEMENT CONTRACT NO
SCALE:16 SCALE:16 SCALE:16

REVISION:
SCALE: -
ATTACHMENT 5
BEAM B3 DETAILS
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:
BEAM BEAM 1. MATERIALS QUALITY :

A. CONCRETE
B2 B2 · SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
150
500
REV DATE AMENDMENTS

Ø13 - 100 Ø13 - 100
1100 5250 1100

8000
PROJECT TITLE:
CAMPUS BUILDING OF
SCALE:30
DRAWING TITLE:
BEAM 3 FBD & PBD SECTION

OWNER
5Ø16 3Ø16 5Ø16

10
10
10
ARCHITECT
5
5
WISNU MAULANA
150
150
150

Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
500
CONSULTANT
500
500
WISNU MAULANA
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
CONTRACTOR:
4Ø16 3Ø16 4Ø16
350 350 350

RIGHT HINGES RINFORCEMENT
LEFT HINGES RINFORCEMENT NON HINGES RINFORCEMENT DRAWN BY: DATE:
SCALE:16
SCALE:16 SCALE:16 WISNU MAULANA JULY 14, 2021
CONTRACT NO
REVISION:
SCALE: -
ATTACHMENT 6
BEAM B4 DETAILS
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:
BEAM BEAM A. CONCRETE
· SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
B1 B3 · COLUMN : F'c = 33,2 MPa
· BEAM : F'c = 33,2 MPa
HINGES AREA NON HINGES HINGES AREA B. STEEL REBAR
· U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22
LONGITUDINAL AREA LONG · U24 (PLAIN) - D13
REINFORCEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINF
150
2. NOTATIONS:
4Ø16 REINFORCEMENT 4Ø16 · B1 (PRIMARY BEAM) : 500 X 700 mm
3Ø16 · B2 (PRIMARY BEAM) : 450 X 600 mm
450
REV DATE AMENDMENTS

HINGES AREA NON HINGES HINGES AREA
TRANSVERSAL AREA TRANS
REINFORCEMENT TRANSVERSAL REINF
Ø13 - 100 REINFORCEMENT Ø13 - 100
Ø13 - 200
1000 875 700

FOR CONSTRUCTION
2575
3000 PROJECT TITLE:
CAMPUS BUILDING OF
SCALE:30
DRAWING TITLE:
BEAM 4 FBD & PBD SECTION

OWNER
3Ø16 2Ø16 3Ø16

10
10
10
ARCHITECT
5
5
WISNU MAULANA
150
150
150

Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
450
450
450
CONSULTANT
WISNU MAULANA
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
2Ø16 2Ø16 2Ø16 CONTRACTOR:
250 250 250

SCALE:16 SCALE:16 SCALE:16 DRAWN BY:
WISNU MAULANA
DATE:
JULY 14, 2021
CONTRACT NO
REVISION:
SCALE: -
ATTACHMENT 7
COLUMN K1 DETAILS
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:
10 A. CONCRETE
· SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
5 90 · COLUMN
· BEAM
: F'c = 33,2 MPa
: F'c = 33,2 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
· U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22
· U24 (PLAIN) - D13
550
16Ø22 2. NOTATIONS:

105
REV DATE AMENDMENTS
550
450 X 600
BEAM 2
600
SECTION A DETAILS
SCALE:16
HINGES AREA
600
LONGITUDINAL C
REINFORCEMENT
FOR CONSTRUCTION
16Ø22
10 PROJECT TITLE:
5 90 CAMPUS BUILDING OF
B
550
NON HINGES AREA 16Ø22
4000
2800
1600
DRAWING TITLE:
LONGITUDINAL
REINFORCEMENT COLUMN K1 FBD SECTION
16Ø22 REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
A OWNER
105
550
HINGES AREA
SECTION A DETAILS
600
LONGITUDINAL
REINFORCEMENT SCALE:16 ARCHITECT
16Ø22
WISNU MAULANA
450 X 600

BEAM 2
10
600
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
5 90 CONSULTANT
WISNU MAULANA
550
16Ø22 Pondok Cina, Beji, Depok
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
CONTRACTOR:
105
COLUMN K1 REINFORCEMENT DETAIL 550
SCALE:30 DRAWN BY: DATE:
SECTION A DETAILS
SCALE:16
CONTRACT NO
REVISION:
SCALE: -
SHOP DRAWING
REMARKS:
10 A. CONCRETE
· SLAB : F'c = 24,9 MPa
5 90 · COLUMN
· BEAM
: F'c = 33,2 MPa
: F'c = 33,2 MPa
B. STEEL REBAR
· U42 (DEFORMED) - D16, D19, D22
· U24 (PLAIN) - D13
2. NOTATIONS:
550
8Ø22 · B2 (PRIMARY BEAM) : 450 X 600 mm

105
REV DATE AMENDMENTS
450 X 600
BEAM 2
550
600
SECTION A DETAILS
SCALE:16
HINGES AREA
600
LONGITUDINAL C
REINFORCEMENT
16Ø22 FOR CONSTRUCTION
10 PROJECT TITLE:
5 90 CAMPUS BUILDING OF
B CIVIL ENGINEERING FACULTY
550
NON HINGES AREA
8Ø22
4000
2800
1600
LONGITUDINAL DRAWING TITLE:

REINFORCEMENT
16Ø22 COLUMN K1 PBD SECTION
A
OWNER
105
550
HINGES AREA
SECTION A DETAILS
600
LONGITUDINAL
REINFORCEMENT SCALE:16
ARCHITECT
16Ø22
WISNU MAULANA
450 X 600
BEAM 2

600
10 Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
5 90 CONSULTANT
WISNU MAULANA
Phone: +62 - 812- 8032 - 3774
550
8Ø22
CONTRACTOR:
COLUMN K1 REINFORCEMENT DETAIL 105

SCALE:30
550 DRAWN BY:
WISNU MAULANA
DATE:
JULY 14, 2021
SECTION A DETAILS
CONTRACT NO
SCALE:16
REVISION:
SCALE: -
ATTACHMENT 8
ANALYSIS OF COLUMN SECTION
spColumn v6.00
Computer program for the Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Sections
Copyright - 1988-2021, STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC.
All rights reserved
y
x
Licensee stated below acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot be responsible for either the accuracy or adequacy of the material
supplied as input for processing by the spColumn computer program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes any warranty expressed nor implied
with respect to the correctness of the output prepared by the spColumn program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to produce spColumn error
free the program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only responsibility for analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's.
Accordingly, STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any analysis, design or engineering documents prepared
in connection with the use of the spColumn program. Licensed to: Wisnu, Sco. License ID: -1EEFB
STRUCTUREPOINT - spColumn v6.00 Page | 2
Licensed to: Wisnu, Sco. License ID: -1EEFB 7/19/2021
untitled.col 6:30 PM
Contents
1. General Information ......................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Material Properties........................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1. Concrete ................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2. Steel ......................................................................................................................................................... 3
3. Section............................................................................................................................................................. 3
3.1. Shape and Properties............................................................................................................................... 3
3.2. Section Figure .......................................................................................................................................... 4
4. Reinforcement ................................................................................................................................................. 4
4.1. Bar Set: ASTM 615M ............................................................................................................................... 4
4.2. Confinement and Factors ......................................................................................................................... 4
4.3. Arrangement............................................................................................................................................. 4
5. Factored Loads and Moments with Corresponding Capacities ....................................................................... 5
List of Figures
Figure 1: Column section..................................................................................................................................... 4
1. General Information
File Name untitled.col
Project 5th Civil Faculty
Column 550 x 550
Engineer Wisnu
Code ACI 318-14
Bar Set ASTM 615M
Units Metric
Run Option Investigation
Run Axis Biaxial
Slenderness Not Considered
Column Type Structural
2. Material Properties
2.1. Concrete
Type Standard
f'c 33.2 MPa
Ec 27081.1 MPa
fc 28.22 MPa
εu 0.003 mm/mm
β1 0.809245
2.2. Steel
Type Standard
fy 420 MPa
Es 200000 MPa
εyt 0.0021 mm/mm
3. Section
3.1. Shape and Properties
Type Rectangular
Width 550 mm
Depth 550 mm
Ag 302500 mm2
Ix 7.62552e+009 mm4
Iy 7.62552e+009 mm4
rx 158.771 mm
ry 158.771 mm
Xo 0 mm
Yo 0 mm
3.2. Section Figure
y
x
Rectangular 550 x 550 mm 2.05% reinf.
Figure 1: Column section
4. Reinforcement
4.1. Bar Set: ASTM 615M
Bar Diameter Area Bar Diameter Area Bar Diameter Area
mm mm2 mm mm2 mm mm2
#10 9.50 71.00 #13 12.70 129.00 #16 15.90 199.00
#19 19.10 284.00 #22 22.20 387.00 #25 25.40 510.00
#29 28.70 645.00 #32 32.30 819.00 #36 35.80 1006.00
#43 43.00 1452.00 #57 57.30 2581.00
4.2. Confinement and Factors

Confinement type Tied
For #32 bars or less #13 ties
For larger bars #13 ties
Capacity Reduction Factors

Axial compression, (a) 0.8
Tension controlled ɸ, (b) 0.9
Compression controlled ɸ, (c) 0.65
4.3. Arrangement
Pattern All sides equal
Bar layout Rectangular
Cover to Transverse bars
Clear cover 40 mm
Bars 16 #22
Total steel area, As 6192 mm2

Rho 2.05 %
Minimum clear spacing 83 mm
5. Factored Loads and Moments with Corresponding Capacities

No Pu Mux Muy ɸMnx ɸMny ɸMn/Mu NA dt Depth εt ɸ
Depth
kN kNm kNm kNm kNm mm mm
1 2869.65 54.23 0.91 580.92 9.75 10.712 330 496 0.00152 0.650
2 3111.40 55.14 1.09 567.69 11.22 10.295 349 498 0.00128 0.650
3 3257.48 68.51 290.94 122.01 518.15 1.781 431 605 0.00121 0.650
4 2898.40 206.04 293.93 291.64 416.05 1.415 458 681 0.00146 0.650
5 3292.72 93.62 296.03 157.50 498.02 1.682 451 631 0.00119 0.650
6 2933.64 180.93 293.03 267.92 433.91 1.481 456 675 0.00144 0.650
7 3688.75 397.61 82.00 504.17 103.98 1.268 458 595 0.00089 0.650
8 2491.80 517.56 91.99 556.20 98.86 1.075 356 580 0.00188 0.650
9 3699.32 405.14 94.09 498.32 115.73 1.230 466 605 0.00089 0.650
10 2502.38 510.03 84.10 559.78 92.30 1.098 354 574 0.00187 0.650
11 1778.15 94.18 291.47 177.74 550.08 1.887 330 626 0.00269 0.701
12 1419.06 180.37 294.47 285.65 466.35 1.584 339 669 0.00292 0.720
13 1813.39 119.28 295.49 209.18 518.19 1.754 347 643 0.00256 0.690
14 1454.31 155.27 292.49 260.35 490.43 1.677 335 661 0.00293 0.721
15 2209.41 423.28 82.54 561.50 109.49 1.327 340 585 0.00218 0.657
16 1012.47 491.90 92.53 635.73 119.59 1.292 221 570 0.00475 0.879
17 2219.99 430.81 93.55 552.69 120.02 1.283 347 594 0.00214 0.654
18 1023.04 484.37 83.56 643.70 111.05 1.329 217 565 0.00481 0.883
spColumn v6.00
Computer program for the Strength Design of Reinforced Concrete Sections
Copyright - 1988-2021, STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC.
All rights reserved
y
x
Licensee stated below acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot be responsible for either the accuracy or adequacy of the material
supplied as input for processing by the spColumn computer program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes any warranty expressed nor implied
with respect to the correctness of the output prepared by the spColumn program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to produce spColumn error
free the program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only responsibility for analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's.
Accordingly, STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any analysis, design or engineering documents prepared
in connection with the use of the spColumn program. Licensed to: Wisnu, Sco. License ID: -1EEFB
Contents
1. General Information .........................................................................................................................................3
2. Material Properties...........................................................................................................................................3
2.1. Concrete...................................................................................................................................................3
2.2. Steel .........................................................................................................................................................3
3. Section.............................................................................................................................................................3
3.1. Shape and Properties...............................................................................................................................3
3.2. Section Figure ..........................................................................................................................................4
4. Reinforcement .................................................................................................................................................4
4.1. Bar Set: ASTM 615M ...............................................................................................................................4
4.2. Confinement and Factors .........................................................................................................................4
4.3. Arrangement.............................................................................................................................................4
5. Factored Loads and Moments with Corresponding Capacities .......................................................................5
List of Figures
Figure 1: Column section.....................................................................................................................................4
1. General Information
File Name untitled.col
Project 5th Civil Fauclty
Column 550x550
Engineer Wisnu
Code ACI 318-14
Bar Set ASTM 615M
Units Metric
Run Option Investigation
Run Axis Biaxial
Slenderness Not Considered
Column Type Architectural
2. Material Properties
2.1. Concrete
Type Standard
f'c 33.2 MPa
Ec 27081.1 MPa
fc 28.22 MPa
εu 0.003 mm/mm
β1 0.809245
2.2. Steel
Type Standard
fy 420 MPa
Es 200000 MPa
εyt 0.0021 mm/mm
3. Section
3.1. Shape and Properties
Type Rectangular
Width 550 mm
Depth 550 mm
Ag 302500 mm2
Ix 7.62552e+009 mm4
Iy 7.62552e+009 mm4
rx 158.771 mm
ry 158.771 mm
Xo 0 mm
Yo 0 mm
3.2. Section Figure
y
x
Rectangular 550 x 550 mm 1.02% reinf.
Figure 1: Column section
4. Reinforcement
4.1. Bar Set: ASTM 615M
Bar Diameter Area Bar Diameter Area Bar Diameter Area
mm mm2 mm mm2 mm mm2
#10 9.50 71.00 #13 12.70 129.00 #16 15.90 199.00
#19 19.10 284.00 #22 22.20 387.00 #25 25.40 510.00
#29 28.70 645.00 #32 32.30 819.00 #36 35.80 1006.00
#43 43.00 1452.00 #57 57.30 2581.00
4.2. Confinement and Factors

Confinement type Tied
For #32 bars or less #13 ties
For larger bars #13 ties
Capacity Reduction Factors

Axial compression, (a) 0.8
Tension controlled ɸ, (b) 0.9
Compression controlled ɸ, (c) 0.65
4.3. Arrangement
Pattern Equal spacing
Bar layout Rectangular
Cover to Transverse bars
Clear cover 40 mm
Bars 8 #22
Total steel area, As 3096 mm2

Rho 1.02 %
Minimum clear spacing 189 mm
5. Factored Loads and Moments with Corresponding Capacities

No Pu Mux Muy ɸMnx ɸMny ɸMn/Mu NA dt Depth εt ɸ
Depth
kN kNm kNm kNm kNm mm mm
1 2869.65 54.23 0.91 485.25 8.11 8.947 341 497 0.00137 0.650
2 3111.40 55.14 1.09 475.09 9.39 8.616 366 499 0.00109 0.650
3 3208.26 26.95 191.49 64.45 457.96 2.392 423 571 0.00105 0.650
4 2958.70 156.13 193.49 272.89 338.18 1.748 479 685 0.00129 0.650
5 3232.42 43.70 195.58 99.05 443.28 2.267 449 605 0.00105 0.650
6 2982.86 139.37 193.58 254.77 353.86 1.828 479 683 0.00128 0.650
7 3507.88 246.40 53.68 431.77 94.06 1.752 473 602 0.00081 0.650
8 2676.00 363.85 60.35 467.37 77.52 1.285 380 581 0.00159 0.650
9 3515.12 251.43 62.44 426.91 106.02 1.698 482 614 0.00082 0.650
10 2683.25 358.82 55.77 469.37 72.95 1.308 378 576 0.00158 0.650
11 1728.93 52.62 192.02 129.24 471.64 2.456 297 611 0.00319 0.744
12 1479.37 130.46 194.02 246.92 367.23 1.893 333 673 0.00306 0.733
13 1753.09 69.37 195.04 158.33 445.17 2.282 322 634 0.00292 0.720
14 1503.52 113.71 193.04 227.99 387.05 2.005 329 667 0.00308 0.735
15 1196.67 338.19 60.88 491.74 88.52 1.454 198 561 0.00550 0.900
16 2028.54 272.07 54.22 480.05 95.67 1.764 317 590 0.00259 0.693
17 2035.79 277.10 61.90 471.27 105.28 1.701 327 600 0.00252 0.686
18 1203.91 333.16 55.24 494.20 81.94 1.483 195 555 0.00561 0.900
ATTACHMENT 9
PUSHOVER ANALYSIS V VS DISPLACEMENT
X DIRECTION CPM PBD
ETABS 17.0.1 License #
Pushover Curve - FEMA 440 Equivalent Linearization

Summary Description
This is the data for a FEMA 440 equivalent linearization pushover analysis.
General Input Data

Name Pushover1
Load Case Push X Plot Type FEMA 440 EL
Demand Spectrum Input Data

Source ASCE 7-10 General Ss 0.656
Site Class D S1 0.29
Tl 8 sec
Effective Period and Effective Damping Parameters
Inherent Damping 0.05
Damping Params Default Value Period Parameters Default Value
A 4.2 G 0.11
B -0.83 H -0.018
C 10 I 0.09
D 1.6 J 0.14
E 22 K 0.77
F 0.4 L 0.05
Pushover Plot
Spectral Acceleration, g
9. Push X PBD Rev.EDB Page 1 of 2 7/23/2021

Plot Items
Demand Spectra Ductility Ratios 1; 1.5; 2; 2.5
Constant Period Lines 0.5; 1; 1.5; 2
Performance Point
Point Found Yes T secant 1.749 sec
Shear 28144.4892 kN T effective 1.879 sec
Displacement 252.655 mm Ductility Ratio 4.264148
Sa 0.226442 Effective Damping 0.2004
Sd 172.135 mm Modification Factor 1.153682
Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Capacity Curve Coordinates
Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 1.102
24.444 0.080989 1.102
51.231 0.138334 1.221
79.737 0.165744 1.392
110.711 0.186932 1.544
141.032 0.206802 1.657
169.433 0.224779 1.742
184.136 0.233829 1.78
211.323 0.249865 1.845
219.599 0.249951 1.881
222.874 0.235938 1.95
249.14 0.272081 1.92
260.963 0.293395 1.892
273.472 0.306677 1.895

ATTACHMENT 10
Y DIRECTION CPM PBD

Summary Description
General Input Data

Name Pushover2
Load Case Push Y Plot Type FEMA 440 EL

Tl 8 sec
A 4.2 G 0.11
B -0.83 H -0.018
C 10 I 0.09
D 1.6 J 0.14
E 22 K 0.77
F 0.4 L 0.05
Pushover Plot
10. Push Y PBD Rev.EDB Page 1 of 2 7/23/2021

Plot Items
Performance Point

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 1.081
23.06 0.07938 1.081
39.283 0.123982 1.129
69.832 0.154381 1.349
98.334 0.176108 1.499
141.838 0.207642 1.658
182.617 0.23351 1.774
209.603 0.249544 1.839
236.09 0.270717 1.874
239.402 0.253319 1.951
244.107 0.258603 1.949

ATTACHMENT 11
X DIRECTION DCM PBD
Pushover Curve - ASCE 41-13 Displacement Modification

Summary Description
This is the data for a ASCE 41-13 displacement modification pushover analysis.
General Input Data
Name Pushover2
Load Case Push X Plot Type ASCE 41-13 NSP
Damping Ratio 0.05 Source ASCE 7-10 General
Include SSI No Accel Ss 0.656
C2 Type Default Value Accel S1 0.29
Cm Type Default Value Site Class D
Tl 8 sec
Pushover Plot
E+3 ASCE 41-13 NSP

40.0
Legend
36.0 Capacity
Bilinear FD
32.0
28.0
Base Shear, kN
24.0
20.0
16.0
12.0
8.0
4.0
0.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400
Displacement, mm
Target Displacement Results
Displacement 213.698 mm Shear 26094.3916 kN

Calculated Parameters
C0 1.473114 Sa 0.471722 g
C1 1 Alpha 0.297282
C2 1 uStrength 4.402119
Ti 1.102 sec Dy 73.21 mm
Te 1.116 sec Vy 16615.5708 kN
Ki 232742.368 kN/m Weight 155056.7639 kN
Ke 226958.016 kN/m Cm 1
Monitored Displ Base Force

mm kN
0 0
38.227 8897.0221
79.298 16183.834
120.838 20362.8864
164.809 23212.3872
207.874 25785.8718
248.745 27950.7746
270.023 29004.8274
270.023 28939.5607
310.023 31119.844
320.023 31159.6583
322.523 30100.2493
362.523 34658.9149
381.261 37128.6807
400 38607.1237

ATTACHMENT 12
Y DIRECTION DCM PBD

Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push Y Plot Type ASCE 41-13 NSP
Tl 20 sec
Pushover Plot
E+3 ASCE 41-13 NSP

40.0
Legend
36.0 Capacity
Bilinear FD
32.0
28.0
Base Shear, kN
24.0
20.0
16.0
12.0
8.0
4.0
0.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400
Displacement, mm

C0 1.475377 Sa 0.486906 g
C1 1 Alpha 0.295615
Ti 1.081 sec Dy 63.085 mm
Te 1.081 sec Vy 15347.0359 kN
Ki 243273.892 kN/m Weight 155056.7639 kN
Ke 243273.892 kN/m Cm 1

mm kN
0 0
36.127 8788.7358
61.022 13885.7294
106.379 18858.8395
146.973 21858.3002
209.196 25842.7117
267.907 29046.1839
307.907 31013.6407
347.907 33163.2529
347.911 31158.6333
355.464 31711.4325

ATTACHMENT 13
X DIRECTION CPM FBD

Summary Description
General Input Data

Name Pushover1
Load Case Push X Plot Type FEMA 440 EL

Tl 8 sec
A 4.2 G 0.11
B -0.83 H -0.018
C 10 I 0.09
D 1.6 J 0.14
E 22 K 0.77
F 0.4 L 0.05
Pushover Plot
7. Push X FBD.EDB Page 1 of 2 7/23/2021

Plot Items
Performance Point

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 1.102
21.642 0.071703 1.102
48.196 0.149557 1.139
76.161 0.182724 1.295
92.74 0.198956 1.37
92.758 0.196974 1.377
106.375 0.209272 1.43
106.392 0.209181 1.431
157.049 0.25662 1.57
184.483 0.275009 1.643
198.321 0.297431 1.638
218.067 0.314405 1.671
258.243 0.364286 1.689
274.405 0.380132 1.705

ATTACHMENT 14
Y DIRECTION CPM FBD

Summary Description
General Input Data

Name Pushover1
Load Case Push Y Plot Type FEMA 440 EL

Tl 20 sec
A 4.2 G 0.11
B -0.83 H -0.018
C 10 I 0.09
D 1.6 J 0.14
E 22 K 0.77
F 0.4 L 0.05
Pushover Plot
8. Push Y PBD.EDB Page 1 of 2 7/23/2021

Plot Items
Performance Point

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 1.081
25.533 0.087887 1.081
34.068 0.117267 1.081
54.057 0.166076 1.145
88.769 0.193899 1.358
118.421 0.216534 1.484
119.006 0.203969 1.533
126.53 0.209596 1.559
126.832 0.204002 1.582
136.682 0.2106 1.616
137.114 0.203853 1.646
151.075 0.212022 1.694
151.404 0.211505 1.698
154.787 0.224625 1.666
186.254 0.256312 1.71
217.223 0.29639 1.718
242.997 0.334108 1.711
272.59 0.385105 1.688
278.736 0.396974 1.681

ATTACHMENT 15
X DIRECTION DCM FBD

Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push X Plot Type ASCE 41-13 NSP
Tl 8 sec
Pushover Plot
E+3 ASCE 41-13 NSP

50.0
Legend
45.0 Capacity
Bilinear FD
40.0
35.0
Base Shear, kN
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400
Displacement, mm

C0 1.499943 Sa 0.471992 g
C1 1 Alpha 0.396921
Ti 1.102 sec Dy 80.163 mm
Te 1.116 sec Vy 18215.2555 kN
Ki 232741.786 kN/m Weight 155056.7639 kN
Ke 227227.057 kN/m Cm 1

mm kN
0 0
33.846 7877.4214
74.95 16601.9699
116.975 21713.3915
141.404 24176.8084
141.408 24041.1967
161.23 25791.0968
161.234 25778.431
234.821 32087.4365
274.821 34608.9565
294.821 36589.3657
314.821 36842.5157
374.821 41828.7546
400 43706.3583

ATTACHMENT 16
Y DIRECTION DCM FBD

Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push Y Plot Type ASCE 41-13 NSP
Tl 20 sec
Pushover Plot
E+3 ASCE 41-13 NSP

50.0
Legend
45.0 Capacity
Bilinear FD
40.0
35.0
Base Shear, kN
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400
Displacement, mm

C0 1.472342 Sa 0.486899 g
C1 1 Alpha 0.17344
Ti 1.081 sec Dy 86.843 mm
Te 1.081 sec Vy 21126.5414 kN
Ki 243273.042 kN/m Weight 155056.7639 kN
Ke 243273.042 kN/m Cm 1

mm kN
0 0
40 9730.9217
53.372 12983.9308
83.982 18890.075
134.556 23631.9188
177.199 26759.5811
177.203 25514.6258
187.952 26300.6273
187.956 25692.2149
202.073 26637.2345
202.077 25908.6448
221.689 27088.5286
221.693 26996.167
226.693 27863.8773
266.693 30859.5464
306.693 34386.9141
346.693 37954.1153
396.693 42883.8245
400 43647.6457

Structural Analysis Report FBD Vs PBD 1628845299

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Analysis Report FBD Vs PBD 1628845299

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Analysis Report FBD Vs PBD 1628845299

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Analysis Report

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT

C. Diaphragm Discontinuity Irregularity.............................................................. 16

XVII. STRCUTURE PROJECT VALUE ................................................................................................... 36

Chart 1 Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading ............................................................................. 4

Figure 1 Model Design of the Structure Building...................................................................... 6

Table 1 Super Imposed Dead Load 1st – 4th Floors................................................................... 2

Table 30 FBD Stiffness – Soft & Extreme Irregularity .............................................................. 24

General Information of structural design is as follows:

II. ANALYSIS METHOD

Analysis method of the planning is as follows:

Reference of the planning is as follows:

IV. MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS

Materials specifications of the planning is as follows:

Load specifications of the planning is as follows:

Table 1. Super Imposed Dead Load 1st – 4th Floors

No Description Volume Unit

Table 2. Super Imposed Dead Load 5th Floors

No Description Volume Unit

C. Live Load (LL)

D. Earthquake Load (EQ)

Parameters summary of earthquake load is as follows:

Equations standard of earthquake load is as follows:

2. If the conditions T0 < T < TS

3. If the conditions TS < T < TL

4. If the conditions T > TL

Earthquake Spectra for Kelapa Gading, North Jakarta shown is as follows:

Chart 1. Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading

Earth Quake Respon Spectrum

VI. LOAD COMBINATIONS

Load combinations of the planning is as follows:

1. Comb1 : 1,4DL + 1,4 SIDL

VII. CALCULATION METHOD

Calculating method of structure is as follows of the chart:

Chart 2. Calculation Method of Force Based Design

Chart 3. Calculation Method of Performance Based Design

VIII. PRELIMINARY DESIGN

Preliminary design of structure is as follows:

IX. ANALYSIS OF THE BUILDING PERFORMACED BASED DESIGN (PBD)

Analysis of the building will be describe as follows:

1. MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE BUILDING

Figure 1. Model Design of the Structure Building

2. MASS OF THE STRUCTURE BUILDING

Table 3. Manual Mass Calculations Summary

Table 4. ETABS Program Mass Calculations Summary

Table 5. Manual Mass Vs ETABS Mass

Mass ETABS Mass Manual Deficit

Table 6. Parameter of Structure Arrangement

A. Structure Displacement Arrangement

4. YIELD DRIFT STRUCTURE

Table 7. Parameter of Yield Drift X Direction

A. Structure Yield Displacement

Table 8. Parameter of Yield Drift Y Direction

A. Structure Yield Displacement

Chart 4. ADRS Vs Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading X Direction

Spektral Displacement ADRS

Based on Chart 4, the effective period (Teff) value is 4,31 sec.

Chart 5. ADRS Vs Earthquake Spectra Kelapa Gading Y Direction

Spektral Displacement ADRS